Enthesitis indices identify different patients with this characteristic in axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis and also in psoriatic arthritis: ASAS-PerSpA data.

BACKGROUND: In axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), peripheral SpA (pSpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), enthesitis is a hallmark clinical feature that can be assessed by the SPARCC index, LEI, MASES and MEI. These indices evaluate different locations, which may identify different numbers of patients with enthesitis among SpA subtypes. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate whether the proportion of patients with at least one enthesitis across these three most prevalent SpA subtypes differs according to the index used and to evaluate the level of agreement among indices in detecting patients with enthesitis. METHODS: A total of 4185 patients (2719 axSpA, 433 pSpA and 1033 PsA) from the international and cross-sectional ASAS-PerSpA study were included. The proportion of patients with enthesitis identified by the indices was evaluated across the three diseases. Pairwise agreement between indices was computed using Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: The prevalence rates of patients with at least one enthesitis according to the MEI, MASES, SPARCC index and LEI were 17.2%, 13.5%, 10.7%, and 8.3%, respectively. In axSpA, the indices that identified the most patients with enthesitis were the MEI and MASES (98.7% and 82.4%, respectively); in pSpA and PsA, the indices that identified the most patients with enthesitis were the MEI and SPARCC index (MEI: 100% and SPARCC: 84.6%; MEI: 97.3% and SPARCC: 77%, respectively). In the total population, the MASES vs. MEI showed the strongest agreement (absolute agreement 96.3%; kappa: 0.86); similar results were obtained in axSpA patients (97.3%; 0.90). In pSpA and PsA patients, the SPARCC vs. MEI (97.2%; 0.90 and 95.4%; 0.83, respectively) showed the strongest agreement. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the prevalence of patients with enthesitis across SpA subtypes differs depending on the disease and the index used. The MEI and MASES appeared best for assessing enthesis in SpA and axSpA, while the MEI and SPARCC index appeared best for assessing enthesitis in pSpA and PsA.

Ultrasound Enthesitis in Psoriasis Patients with or without Psoriatic Arthritis, a Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Background and objectives: The main objective of the current study was to describe the prevalence of enthesitis at different sites in a group of patients with psoriasis with or without psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Materials and Methods: The study included adult patients with psoriasis who underwent clinical examination, laboratory tests and ultrasound examination of the entheses. The enthesitis ultrasound scores (BUSES, MASEI, GUESS) were evaluated; the presence of OMERACT-defined enthesitis was also recorded for each scan site. Results: The study included 16 (57.1%) patients with PsA and 12 (42.9%) patients with psoriasis, with an increased average body mass index (29.3 kg/m2). Compared to psoriasis patients, PsA patients had a higher prevalence of nail psoriasis (68.8% compared to 33.3%; p = 0.063). There were no significant differences regarding the clinical examination of entheses between patients with psoriasis and patients with PsA (p = 0.459). Ultrasound scores, BUSES, GUESS and MASEI proved to have statistically significant higher median values in PsA patients compared to psoriasis patients. Compared to psoriasis patients, PsA patients had a significantly higher prevalence of OMERACT-defined enthesitis of the quadriceps tendon and inferior patellar ligament (both 81.3% compared to 25.0%, p = 0.003). Clinical examination of the lateral epicondyle and of the superior patellar ligament was consistent with their ultrasound examination (κ = 0.357, p = 0.043, respectively, κ = 0.404, p = 0.008). Conclusions: Clinical enthesitis scores do not differ between psoriasis and PsA patients. All analyzed ultrasound scores are significantly higher in patients with PsA. OMERACT-defined enthesitis has the ability to discriminate sonographic enthesitis between the two subgroups for bilateral quadriceps and inferior patellar tendon enthesitis. Bilateral ultrasound damage of entheses can suggest a PsA diagnosis.

Tender to touch-Prevalence and impact of concomitant fibromyalgia and enthesitis in spondyloarthritis: An ancillary analysis of the ASAS PerSpA study.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to evaluate the co-existence of fibromyalgia (FM) & enthesitis in individuals with spondyloarthritis (SpA). Secondary objectives were to identify clinical features associated with the presence of FM in enthesitis and analyse sex-specific differences. METHODS: This was an ancillary analysis of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society Peripheral Involvement in SpA (PerSpA) study. Enthesitis was defined as the presence of enthesitis ever. Clinical FM was defined as the rheumatologist's confirmation of the presence of FM. A score of≥5/6 on the Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Test (FiRST) defined a positive screening test for FM. RESULTS: Enthesitis ever and FM (EFM) co-existed in 10.3% (n=425) of the cohort using FiRST criteria and 5.3% using clinical diagnosis of FM. More individuals with FM by clinical diagnosis had imaging-confirmed enthesitis ever than by FiRST criteria. More females had EFM than males, defined clinically (76.9% vs 23.1%) or by FiRST criteria (62.6% vs 37.4%). Individuals with EFM had more severe disease across all measures compared to those with enthesitis only, with no significant difference between sexes. EFM was significantly associated with age, female sex, BMI, BASDAI and region. CONCLUSION: FM is an important comorbidity in the setting of enthesitis in SpA. While EFM is more common in females, it is not a rare condition in males. EFM is associated with worse disease severity measures in SpA in both males and females. Recognition of FM in the setting of enthesitis is essential to prevent overtreatment and optimise patient outcomes.

Prevalence of peripheral spondyloarthritis among patients with ultrasound-confirmed enthesitis: Single-center cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: The primary goal of this study was to determine the prevalence of peripheral spondyloarthritis (pSpA) in patients with ultrasonography (USG)-confirmed enthesitis. The secondary aim of the study was to reveal the demographic, clinical, and ultrasonographic differences of patients diagnosed with pSpA. METHODS: Fifty-nine patients with USG-confirmed enthesitis were evaluated by a rheumatologist to evaluate if they met the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria for pSpA. Elementary lesions assessed by USG were based on the definition of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology in Clinical Trials group which included hypoechogenicity, thickening, Doppler signal within 2 mm of bone, enthesophytes, bone erosions, and calcifications. For all patients, clinical and demographic data included: age, gender, smoking habits, body mass index, comorbid diseases, symptom duration, enthesitis region, the presence of bilateral enthesitis, entheseal pain visual analog scale (0-10), standardized enthesitis count following Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) and SPondyloArthritis Research Consortium Canada (SPARCC) enthesitis index. RESULTS: Eight (13.6%, 95% CI 6.0% to 25.0%) of 59 patients were diagnosed with pSpA according to the ASAS classification criteria. Participants diagnosed with pSpA had a longer duration of symptoms (54 vs 12 months), were more likely to present bilateral enthesitis (87.5% vs 49%) with higher SPARCC (11 vs 3) and MASES (6.5 vs 2) scores and higher C-reactive protein (7 vs 3.2 mg/L) concentrations. Entheseal Doppler signal and hypoechogenicity were also more frequently observed (50% vs 0% and 100% vs 49% respectively). CONCLUSION: Peripheral SpA is not uncommon among patients presenting with enthesitis and more likely in cases with prolonged, extensive, and bilateral enthesitis with entheseal hypoechogenicity and Doppler signal. Musculoskeletal ultrasonography can facilitate the diagnosis of pSpA in patients presenting with enthesitis.

Enthesitis in patients with psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis - data from the Danish nationwide DANBIO registry.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the registration, pattern and burden of clinical enthesitis among routine-care patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in the Danish nationwide DANBIO registry. METHODS: In patients with PsA and axSpA in DANBIO, prospectively registered data from 2010 to 2020 on clinical entheseal assessment using SPARCC score were compared with demographic, clinical and patient-reported-outcome (PRO) data. RESULTS: 6582 PsA and 5547 axSpA patients had their first registration in DANBIO in 2010 or later ("incident cohort"). At these registrations, 1037 (16%) PsA and 1188 (21%) axSpA patients had entheseal assessments, with ≥1 enthesitis being found in 66% and 39%, respectively. Mean enthesitis scores were 2.5 (PsA) and 1.3 (axSpA). Most common sites were: Achilles tendon (right/left/symmetrical: PsA:24.4%/23.3%/17.1%; axSpA:10.4%/10.6%/8.0%), lateral epicondyle (PsA:22.2%/20.1%/16.2%; axSpA:.4%/9.7%/7.6%), plantar fascia (PsA:17.1%/17.0%/12.6%; axSpA:10.4%/10.6%/8.0%), greater trochanter (PsA:14.2%/15.4%/11.7%; axSpA:9.9%/11.2%/8.2%). Enthesitis was more frequent in women (PsA/axSpA 61%/62%) than men (39%/37%). Patients with vs without enthesitis had higher overall burden (higher physician global, swollen/tender joint counts, pain, fatigue, patient global; fewer in patient-acceptable-symptom-state (PASS)) (all p < 0.05). Comparable demographic, clinical and PRO-results in patients with missing entheseal assessments, support the data being representative. In an "overall" cohort of all patients with ≥1 entheseal assessments after 2010, results on enthesitis were comparable. CONCLUSION: Entheseal assessments were only performed at a minority of clinical visits. Clinical enthesitis was frequent, particularly in women, often symmetrical and associated with a higher physician- and patient-reported disease burden in patients with PsA and axSpA treated in routine practice, emphasizing the need for systematic assessment in routine care.

Prevalence of Enthesopathies in Adults With X-linked Hypophosphatemia: Analysis of Risk Factors.

CONTEXT: Enthesopathies are the determinant of a poor quality of life in adults with X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH). OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence of patients with enthesopathies and to identify the risk factors of having enthesopathies. METHODS: Retrospective study in the French Reference Center for Rare Diseases of the Calcium and Phosphate Metabolism between June 2011 and December 2020. Adult XLH patients with full body X-rays performed using the EOS® low-dose radiation system and clinical data collected from medical records. The main outcome measures were demographics, PHEX mutation, conventional treatment, and dental disease with the presence of enthesopathies. RESULTS: Of the 114 patients included (68% women, mean age 42.2 ± 14.3 years), PHEX mutation was found in 105 patients (94.6%), 86 (77.5%) had been treated during childhood. Enthesopathies (spine and/or pelvis) were present in 67% of the patients (n = 76). Patients with enthesopathies were significantly older (P = .001) and more frequently reported dental disease collected from medical records (P = .03). There was no correlation between the PHEX mutations and the presence of enthesopathies. Sixty-two patients had a radiographic dental examination in a reference center. Severe dental disease (number of missing teeth, number of teeth endodontically treated, alveolar bone loss, and proportion of patients with 5 abscesses or more) was significantly higher in patients with enthesopathies. CONCLUSION: Adult XLH patients have a high prevalence of enthesopathies in symptomatic adults patients with XLH seen in a reference center. Age and severe dental disease were significantly associated with the presence of enthesopathies.

Subclinical enthesopathy of the midfoot: could it be a peculiar feature in early psoriatic arthritis?

OBJECTIVES: Bone scintigraphy (BS) is a sensitive tool that provides functional imaging to evaluate bone abnormalities in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Our aims were to analyse the prevalence of increased BS uptake in the midfoot of PsA patients and to evaluate whether BS midfoot abnormalities could herald ultrasonography (US) and x-ray lesions in the same site. METHODS: Out of 88 consecutive BS performed in patients with early musculoskeletal symptoms (January-December 2010) and retrospectively analysed, 32 exams were carried out on subjects 3 months after being diagnosed with PsA. These patients were included in a retrospective study and analysed for BS feet uptake. Their baseline x-rays of the feet were also retrieved. Five years after BS (January-December 2015) all 32 PsA patients underwent clinical evaluation, x-rays and US of the feet. Frequency and percentage of each imaging abnormality of the midfoot were analysed. Clinical, functional and laboratory indexes were collected and correlations between clinical and imaging parameters were studied. RESULTS: Of all 32 PsA patients, 21 (65.6%) had an increased BS uptake in the midfoot, without any baseline x-ray abnormalities. After 5 years, the x-rays and US were able to detect ≥1 lesion in the midfoot of 14/32 (43.8%) and 28/32 (87.5%) patients, respectively. A high prevalence of enthesophytes in all 64 midfeet was shown by both x-rays (40.6%) and US (81.6%). We found a higher prevalence of structural lesions in the subgroup with BS positive midfoot compared with BS negative patients: x-rays [10/21 (47.6%) vs. 4/11 (36.4%); p=0.04] and US [19/21 (90.5%) vs. 8/11 (72.7%); p=0.04]. CONCLUSIONS: Midfoot involvement is frequent in PsA. BS increased uptake in the midfoot seems to be an early sign of the disease.

Prevalence of extra-articular manifestations in psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence of extra-articular manifestations-enthesitis, dactylitis, nail disease, uveitis and IBD-in PsA, and their impact on longitudinal disease outcomes. METHODS: We searched Medline, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science using a predefined protocol in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies using imaging to define extra-articular manifestations (EAMs) were excluded. Where possible, we performed meta-analyses of prevalence estimates, reported as percentages (95% CI). Heterogeneity (I2 statistic) was examined according to study characteristics. RESULTS: We identified 65 studies amounting to a total of 163 299 PsA patients. Enthesitis was assessed in 29 studies with an average prevalence of 30% (95% CI: 24%, 38%). Dactylitis was reported in 35 studies with an average prevalence of 25% (95% CI: 20%, 31%). Nail disease was present in 60% (95% CI: 52%, 68%) across 26 studies, but definitions were often unclear. Uveitis (3.2%; 95% CI: 1.9%, 5.3%) and IBD (3.3%; 95% CI: 1.5%, 7.1%) were less common. Heterogeneity was high (>95%) in all meta-analyses, but could not be explained by study characteristics. No studies examined the impact of EAMs on longitudinal disease outcomes, except that dactylitis increases radiographic progression. CONCLUSION: Enthesitis, dactylitis and nail disease are highly prevalent in PsA, but not uveitis and IBD. EAM patterns differ from axial SpA despite their shared disease mechanisms, which may help further understand differences between spondyloarthritides. More studies are needed on the impact of EAMs on disease outcomes such as response to treatment.

Enthesitis and its relationship with disease activity, functional status, and quality of life in psoriatic arthritis: a multi-center study.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory arthritis with distinct phenotypic subtypes. Enthesitis is assigned as a hallmark of the disease, given its significant relations to disease activity and quality of life. Our objective is to evaluate the prevalence of enthesitis and its association with some clinical parameters, particularly quality of life, using data from a national registry. Patients with PsA meeting ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) were enrolled by means of a multi-centre Turkish League Against Rheumatism (TLAR) Network Project. The following information was recorded in web-based case report forms: demographic, clinical and radiographic data; physical examination findings, including tender and swollen joint counts (TJC and SJC); nail and skin involvement; Disease Activity Score-28 for Rheumatoid Arthritis with Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS 28-ESR); Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI); Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES); Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI); Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index for the spine (BASRI-s); Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ); Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI); Health Assessment Questionnaire for the spondyloarthropathies (HAQ-s); Psoriatic arthritis quality of Life scale (PsAQoL); Short Form 36 (SF-36); Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS); Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F); and Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool (FiRST) scores. The patients were divided into two groups, namely with and without enthesitis, based on the triple Likert-type physician-reported statement of 'active enthesitis', 'history of enthesitis' or 'none' in the case report forms. Patients with active enthesitis were compared to others in terms of these clinical parameters. A total of 1130 patients were enrolled in this observational study. Of these patients, 251 (22.2%) had active enthesitis according to the clinical assessment. TJC, HAQ-s, BASDAI, FiRST and PsAQoL were significantly higher whereas the SF-36 scores were lower in patients with enthesitis (p < 0.05). Chronic back pain, dactylitis, and tenosynovitis were more frequent in the enthesopathy group (59.4%/39%, 13.1%/6.5% and 24.7%/3.4%, respectively). Significant positive correlations between the MASES score and the TJC, HAQ, DAS 28-ESR, BASDAI, FiRST and PsAQoL scores, and a negative correlation with the SF-36 score were found. When linear regression analysis was performed, the SF-36 MCS and PCS scores decreased by - 9.740 and - 11.795 units, and the FiRST scores increased by 1.223 units in patients with enthesitis. Enthesitis is an important involvement of PsA with significant relations to quality of life determined with PsAQoL and SF-36 scores. Our study found higher frequency of dactylitis and chronic back pain, and worse quality of life determined with SF-36 and PsAQoL scores in patients with enthesitis.

Reliability of a consensus-based ultrasound definition and scoring for enthesitis in spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis: an OMERACT US initiative.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reliability of consensus-based ultrasound (US) definitions of elementary components of enthesitis in spondyloarthritis (SpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and to evaluate which of them had the highest contribution to defining and scoring enthesitis. METHODS: Eleven sonographers evaluated 40 entheses from five patients with SpA/PsA at four bilateral sites. Nine US elementary lesions were binary-scored: hypoechogenicity, thickened insertion, enthesophytes, calcifications, erosions, bone irregularities, bursitis and Doppler signal inside and around enthesis. Kappa statistics were used to evaluate reliability. Sonographers were also asked to state which lesions can be considered as inflammatory or structural and should be included in the final definition of enthesitis. Only the lesions, scored as present in at least 75% of the entheses considered as having an enthesitis, were included in the final definition. RESULTS: The prevalence of detected lesions was quite low except for enthesophytes (55%) and bone irregularities (54%). Reliability ranged from poor to good (the lowest for thickened enthesis (kappa 0.1 (95% CI 0 to 0.7)) and the highest for enthesophytes (kappa 0.6 (95% CI 0.5 to 0.7)). When adjusted for low prevalence, kappa values increased for all lesions, with the best result observed for detecting Doppler signal at insertion (0.9) and for bursitis (0.8). The US components included in the final definition were hypoechogenicity, increased thickness at enthesis, erosions and calcifications/enthesophytes and Doppler signal at insertion. CONCLUSION: By using a consensus-based stepwise approach, a final reliable US score and definition of enthesitis in SpA/PsA were produced. Further studies are sought for implementing this score in clinical trials and practice.

Clinical Characteristics, Disease Activity, and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Psoriatic Arthritis Patients With Dactylitis or Enthesitis: Results From the Corrona Psoriatic Arthritis/Spondyloarthritis Registry.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients with dactylitis or enthesitis and evaluate the associations of these manifestations with disease activity and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: Using the Corrona PsA/Spondyloarthritis Registry, patient characteristics, disease activity, and patient-reported outcomes at registry enrollment were assessed for PsA patients ages ≥18 years with or without dactylitis or enthesitis. Regression models were used to evaluate associations of dactylitis and enthesitis with outcomes, including minimal disease activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire scores, patient-reported pain and fatigue, and work productivity (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire). Adjustments were made for age, sex, race, body mass index, disease duration, and history of biologic agent, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, and prednisone use. RESULTS: This analysis included 1,567 PsA patients (420 with enthesitis; 228 with dactylitis). Patients with versus without dactylitis or enthesitis had greater disease activity and were less likely to be in minimal disease activity (P < 0.05). Patients with versus without enthesitis had poorer functional status as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire (adjusted P = 4.15 x 10-5 ), greater patient-reported pain and fatigue (adjusted P < 0.0001), and greater likelihood of any impairment while working (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.57, P = 0.027), overall work impairment (OR 1.85, P = 0.006), and activity impairment (OR 1.77, P = 0.008). Dactylitis was associated with similar numerical trends, but differences versus patients without dactylitis did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Enthesitis and dactylitis are associated with greater overall disease burden of PsA, underscoring the importance of identifying, assessing, and effectively managing these periarticular manifestations.

Clinical Enthesitis in a Prospective Longitudinal Psoriatic Arthritis Cohort: Incidence, Prevalence, Characteristics, and Outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence, prevalence, characteristics, disease associations, risk factors, and outcome of clinical enthesitis in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: The study included patients with PsA followed prospectively. Enthesitis was defined as the presence of at least 1 tender enthesis at 1 of the 18 entheseal sites of the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada enthesitis index. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2014, 281 of 803 patients had enthesitis, providing a prevalence of 35%. A total of 192 patients developed enthesitis during the course of followup, with an annual incidence of 0.9%. Most of the patients had 1 (48.4%) or 2 (32.2%) tender entheseal sites, and the mean ± SD number of sites per visit was 2.03 ± 1.6. The 3 most common sites were at the insertions of the Achilles tendon, plantar fascia on the calcaneus, and the lateral epicondyles (24.2%, 20.8%, and 17.2%, respectively). More active disease (higher actively inflamed joint count, tenosynovitis, and dactylitis), more pain, and less clinical damage were associated with enthesitis. Higher body mass index, more actively inflamed joints, and younger age were risk factors for developing this condition. Enthesitis resolved in most patients without changing treatment. CONCLUSION: Clinical enthesitis is common, with a period prevalence of 35% of PsA patients. It usually involves only 1 or 2 sites simultaneously. The most common tender sites are at the insertions of the Achilles tendon, plantar fascia, and the lateral epicondyles. More active disease and more pain are associated with enthesitis.

Nail involvement can predict enthesopathy in patients with psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Although subclinical enthesopathy is a well-established diagnostic criterion for psoriatic arthritis (PsA), it is frequently overlooked, as many patients are asymptomatic. The possibility of finding a clinical clue predicting enthesopathy would help clinicians establish an early diagnosis of PsA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective single-center study of a total of 90 patients with psoriasis was conducted to assess the presence of entheseal abnormalities as detected by ultrasound, and to determine any correlation with nail involvement. RESULTS: Entheseal abnormalities were found in 23 patients (25.5 %), 19 (82.6 %) of whom showed nail involvement, whereas four (17.4 %) individuals did not. Enthesopathy was present in 31.1 % (19/61) of patients with onychopathy compared to 13.8 % (4/29) of those without nail involvement (p  =  0.07). There was a significant correlation between target NAPSI score and evidence of enthesopathy. In addition, the number of nails affected also showed a significant correlation with the presence of enthesopathy (p  = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical evidence of onychopathy may be the clue to an early diagnosis of enthesopathy in psoriasis patients.

Incidence and risk factors of calcaneal enthesophytes in spondyloarthritis and trauma patients.

OBJECTIVE: Achilles enthesitis and plantar fasciitis are the features of spondyloarthritis (SpA). Enthesophytes may indicate enthesitis, but their incidence is also high in elderly individuals and in athletes. This study aimed to clarify the incidences and risk factors of Achilles enthesophyte (AE) and plantar entesophye (PE) in SpA and trauma patients. METHOD: We retrospectively surveyed radiographs of the feet of SpA and trauma patients in our hospital. The SpA group included 17 patients (33 feet), and the trauma group included 33 patients (37 feet) who had undergone surgery between April 2013 and March 2014. RESULTS: The incidence of AEs was 63.6% (21 feet) in the SpA group and 54.1% (20 feet) in the trauma group (p = 0.45). The incidence of PEs was 48.9% (16 feet) in the SpA group and 16.2% (6 feet) in the trauma group. The SpA group had a higher prevalence of PEs than the trauma group (p < 0.01). The multivariate analysis showed that the risk factors for AEs and PEs were SpA and age. CONCLUSION: The risk factors for AEs and PEs were found to be advanced age and the presence of SpA.

Magnetic resonance imaging features of hip disorders in an Egyptian pediatric population.

Hip disorders in a pediatric population are a diagnostic challenge. The aim of the study is to assess the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of non-traumatic hip disorders in a series of Egyptian patients and to review the literature on the most common hip conditions. Seventy two consecutive patients [40 males (55.6%) and 32 females (44.4)] with acute onset of hip complaints unrelated to trauma or falls were recruited. All patients underwent an initial full clinical assessment and blood tests as well as contrast enhanced MRI of both hips. The most common diagnosis in this group of Egyptian patients was transient synovitis in 29 (40.3%) cases, followed by seronegative enthesopathy and arthropathy syndrome in 8 (11.1%), septic arthritis in 10 (13.9%), tuberculous arthritis in 4 (5.6%), sickle-cell disease in 7 (9.7%), complicated with septic arthritis in 3 (4.2%), transient bone marrow edema (BME) in 3 (4.2%), osteomyelitis in 2 (2.8%), osteosarcoma in 2 (2.8%), sciatic nerve injury in 1 (1.4%), leukemia with BME in 1 (1.4%), coxa vara of both hips and L5/S1 facet joint ankylosis in 1 (1.4%), and a benign bone cyst in 1 (1.4%). MRI studies showed hip effusion in a total of 51 patients (70.8%), joint space narrowing in 9 (12.5%), and BME in 15(20.8%). MRI is a sensitive tool for assessing hip disorders in a pediatric population and can play an important role in both diagnosis and management of different hip disorders, irrespective of the underlying pathology.