Use of Recommended Neurodiagnostic Evaluation Among Patients With Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.

Importance: Interdisciplinary practice parameters recommend that patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) undergo comprehensive neurodiagnostic evaluation, including presurgical assessment. Reporting from specialized centers suggests long delays to referral and underuse of surgery; however, longitudinal data are limited to characterize neurodiagnostic evaluation among patients with DRE in more diverse US settings and populations. Objective: To examine the rate and factors associated with neurodiagnostic studies and comprehensive evaluation among patients with DRE within 3 US cohorts. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model including US multistate Medicaid data, commercial claims data, and Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC) electronic health record data. Patients meeting a validated computable phenotype algorithm for DRE between January 1, 2015, and April 1, 2020, were included. No eligible participants were excluded. Exposure: Demographic and clinical variables were queried. Main Outcomes and Measures: The proportion of patients receiving a composite proxy for comprehensive neurodiagnostic evaluation, including (1) magnetic resonance or other advanced brain imaging, (2) video electroencephalography, and (3) neuropsychological evaluation within 2 years of meeting the inclusion criteria. Results: A total of 33 542 patients with DRE were included in the Medicaid cohort, 22 496 in the commercial insurance cohort, and 2741 in the CUMC database. A total of 31 516 patients (53.6%) were women. The proportion of patients meeting the comprehensive evaluation main outcome in the Medicaid cohort was 4.5% (n = 1520); in the commercial insurance cohort, 8.0% (n = 1796); and in the CUMC cohort, 14.3% (n = 393). Video electroencephalography (24.9% Medicaid, 28.4% commercial, 63.2% CUMC) and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain (35.6% Medicaid, 43.4% commercial, 52.6% CUMC) were performed more regularly than neuropsychological evaluation (13.0% Medicaid, 16.6% commercial, 19.2% CUMC) or advanced imaging (3.2% Medicaid, 5.4% commercial, 13.1% CUMC). Factors independently associated with greater odds of evaluation across all 3 data sets included the number of inpatient and outpatient nonemergency epilepsy visits and focal rather than generalized epilepsy. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest there is a gap in the use of diagnostic studies to evaluate patients with DRE. Care setting, insurance type, frequency of nonemergency visits, and epilepsy type are all associated with evaluation. A common data model can be used to measure adherence with best practices across a variety of observational data sources.

Delays in the diagnosis and surgical treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy: A cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Delay in referral for epilepsy surgery of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) is associated with decreased quality of life, worse surgical outcomes, and increased risk of sudden unexplained death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Understanding the potential causes of delays in referral and treatment is crucial for optimizing the referral and treatment process. We evaluated the treatment intervals, demographics, and clinical characteristics of patients referred for surgical evaluation at our level 4 epilepsy center in the U.S. Intermountain West. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent surgery for DRE between 2012 and 2022. Data collected included patient demographics, DRE diagnosis date, clinical characteristics, insurance status, distance from epilepsy center, date of surgical evaluation, surgical procedure, and intervals between different stages of evaluation. RESULTS: Within our cohort of 185 patients with epilepsy (99 female, 53.5%), the mean ± standard deviation (SD) age at surgery was 38.4 ± 11.9 years. In this cohort, 95.7% of patients had received definitive epilepsy surgery (most frequently neuromodulation procedures) and 4.3% had participated in phase 2 intracranial monitoring but had not yet received definitive surgery. The median (1st-3rd quartile) intervals observed were 10.1 (3.8-21.5) years from epilepsy diagnosis to DRE diagnosis, 16.7 (6.5-28.4) years from epilepsy diagnosis to surgery, and 1.4 (0.6-4.0) years from DRE diagnosis to surgery. We observed significantly shorter median times from epilepsy diagnosis to DRE diagnosis (p < .01) and epilepsy diagnosis to surgery (p < .05) in patients who traveled further for treatment. Patients with public health insurance had a significantly longer time from DRE diagnosis to surgery (p < .001). SIGNIFICANCE: Both shorter distance traveled to our epilepsy center and public health insurance were predictive of delays in diagnosis and treatment intervals. Timely referral of patients with DRE to specialized epilepsy centers for surgery evaluation is crucial, and identifying key factors that may delay referral is paramount to optimizing surgical outcomes.

Frame-based versus robot-assisted stereo-electro-encephalography for drug-resistant epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is an effective presurgical invasive evaluation for drug-resistant epilepsies. The introduction of robotic devices provides a simplified, accurate, and safe alternative to the conventional SEEG technique. We report our institutional experience with robot-assisted SEEG and compare its in vivo accuracy, operation efficiency, and safety with the more traditional SEEG workflow. METHODS: All patients with medically refractory focal epilepsy who underwent SEEG depth electrode implantation between 2014 and 2022 were included in this study. Technical advancements of the robot-assisted technique are described. Analyses of patient demographics, electrode implantation accuracy, operation time, and procedure-related complications were performed. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-six patients underwent 167 SEEG procedures. The first 141 procedures were performed using a conventional approach involving a Leksell stereotactic system, and the last 26 procedures were robot-assisted. Among the 1726 depth electrodes that were inserted, the median entry point localization error was as follows: conventional (1.0 mm; range, 0.1-33.5 mm) and robot-assisted (1.1 mm; range, 0-4.8 mm) (P = 0.17). The median target point localization error was as follows: conventional (2.8 mm; range, 0.1-49 mm) and robot-assisted (1.8 mm; range, 0-30.3 mm) (P < 0.001). The median operation time was significantly reduced with the robot-assisted workflow (90 min vs. 77.5 min; P < 0.01). Total complication rates were as follows: conventional (17.7%) and robot-assisted (11.5%) (P = 0.57). Major complication rates were 3.5% and 7.7% (P = 0.77), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SEEG is a safe and highly accurate method that provides essential guidance for epilepsy surgery. Implementing SEEG in conjunction with multimodal planning systems and robotic devices can further increase safety margin, surgical efficiency, and accuracy.

Stereoelectroencephalography: a review of complications and outcomes in a new Australian centre.

BACKGROUND: Surgical management of refractory focal epilepsy requires preoperative localisation of the epileptogenic zone (EZ). To augment noninvasive studies, stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is being increasingly adopted as a form of intracranial monitoring. AIMS: This study aimed to determine the rate of complications for patients undergoing SEEG and to report the success of SEEG with regard to EZ detection and seizure outcome following definitive surgery. METHODS: A retrospective cohort design investigated all cases of SEEG at our institution. Surgical, anaesthetic and medical complications with subsequent epilepsy surgery and seizure outcome data were extracted from medical records. Multivariate logistic regression was used to investigate the relationship between both the number of electrodes per patient and the duration of SEEG recording with the rate of complications. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients with 66 implantations were included. Headache was the most common complication (n = 54, 82%). There were no major surgical or medical complications. Two anaesthetic complications occurred. EZ localisation was successful in 63 cases (95%). Curative intent surgery was performed in 39 patients (59%) and 23 patients achieved an Engel class I outcome (59% of those undergoing surgery). The number of electrodes and duration of recording were not associated with complications. CONCLUSIONS: No patients in our series experienced major surgical or medical complications and we have highlighted the challenges associated with neuroanaesthesia in SEEG. Our complication rates and seizure outcomes are equivalent to published literature indicating that this technique can be successfully established in newer centres using careful case selection. Standardised reporting of SEEG complications should be adopted.

NLP-based tools for localization of the epileptogenic zone in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

Epilepsy surgery is an option for people with focal onset drug-resistant (DR) seizures but a delayed or incorrect diagnosis of epileptogenic zone (EZ) location limits its efficacy. Seizure semiological manifestations and their chronological appearance contain valuable information on the putative EZ location but their interpretation relies on extensive experience. The aim of our work is to support the localization of EZ in DR patients automatically analyzing the semiological description of seizures contained in video-EEG reports. Our sample is composed of 536 descriptions of seizures extracted from Electronic Medical Records of 122 patients. We devised numerical representations of anamnestic records and seizures descriptions, exploiting Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques, and used them to feed Machine Learning (ML) models. We performed three binary classification tasks: localizing the EZ in the right or left hemisphere, temporal or extra-temporal, and frontal or posterior regions. Our computational pipeline reached performances above 70% in all tasks. These results show that NLP-based numerical representation combined with ML-based classification models may help in localizing the origin of the seizures relying only on seizures-related semiological text data alone. Accurate early recognition of EZ could enable a more appropriate patient management and a faster access to epilepsy surgery to potential candidates.

Identifying epilepsy surgery referral candidates with natural language processing in an Australian context.

OBJECTIVE: Epilepsy surgery is known to be underutilized. Machine learning-natural language processing (ML-NLP) may be able to assist with identifying patients suitable for referral for epilepsy surgery evaluation. METHODS: Data were collected from two tertiary hospitals for patients seen in neurology outpatients for whom the diagnosis of "epilepsy" was mentioned. Individual case note review was undertaken to characterize the nature of the diagnoses discussed in these notes, and whether those with epilepsy fulfilled prespecified criteria for epilepsy surgery workup (namely focal drug refractory epilepsy without contraindications). ML-NLP algorithms were then developed using fivefold cross-validation on the first free-text clinic note for each patient to identify these criteria. RESULTS: There were 457 notes included in the study, of which 250 patients had epilepsy. There were 37 (14.8%) individuals who fulfilled the prespecified criteria for epilepsy surgery referral without described contraindications, 32 (12.8%) of whom were not referred for epilepsy surgical evaluation in the given clinic visit. In the prediction of suitability for epilepsy surgery workup using the prespecified criteria, the tested models performed similarly. For example, the random forest model returned an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.97 (95% confidence interval 0.93-1.0) for this task, sensitivity of 1.0, and specificity of 0.93. SIGNIFICANCE: This study has shown that there are patients in tertiary hospitals in South Australia who fulfill prespecified criteria for epilepsy surgery evaluation who may not have been referred for such evaluation. ML-NLP may assist with the identification of patients suitable for such referral. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Epilepsy surgery is a beneficial treatment for selected individuals with drug-resistant epilepsy. However, it is vastly underutilized. One reason for this underutilization is a lack of prompt referral of possible epilepsy surgery candidates to comprehensive epilepsy centers. Natural language processing, coupled with machine learning, may be able to identify possible epilepsy surgery candidates through the analysis of unstructured clinic notes. This study, conducted in two tertiary hospitals in South Australia, demonstrated that there are individuals who fulfill criteria for epilepsy surgery evaluation referral but have not yet been referred. Machine learning-natural language processing demonstrates promising results in assisting with the identification of such suitable candidates in Australia.

The value of additional electrodes when stereo-electroencephalography is inconclusive.

OBJECTIVE: Stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) is the preferred method for intracranial localization of the seizure-onset zone (SOZ) in drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Occasionally SEEG evaluation fails to confirm the pre-implantation hypothesis. This leads to a decision tree regarding whether the addition of SEEG electrodes (two-step SEEG - 2sSEEG) or placement of subdural electrodes (SDEs) after SEEG (SEEG2SDE) would help. There is a dearth of literature encompassing this scenario, and here we aimed to characterize outcomes following unplanned two-step intracranial EEG (iEEG). METHODS: All 225 adult SEEG cases over 8 years at our institution were reviewed to extract patient data and outcomes following a two-step evaluation. Three raters independently quantified benefits of additional intracranial electrodes. The relationship between two-step iEEG benefit and clinical outcome was then analyzed. RESULTS: Fourteen patients underwent 2sSEEG and nine underwent SEEG2SDE. In the former cohort, the second SEEG procedure was performed for these reasons-precise localization of the SOZ (36%); defining margins of eloquent cortex (21%); and broadening coverage in the setting of non-localizable seizure onsets (43% of cases). Sixty-four percent of 2sSEEG cases were consistently deemed beneficial (Light's κ = 0.80). 2sSEEG performed for the first two indications was much more beneficial than when onsets were not localizable (100% vs 17%, p = .02). In the SEEG2SDE cohort, SDEs identified the SOZ and enabled delineation of margins relative to eloquent cortex in all cases. SIGNIFICANCE: The two-step iEEG is useful if the initial evaluation is broadly concordant with the original electroclinical hypothesis, where it can clarify onset zones or delineate safe surgical margins; however, it provides minimal benefit when the implantation hypothesis is erroneous, and we recommend that 2sSEEG not be generally utilized in such cases. SDE implantation after SEEG minimizes the need for SDEs and is helpful in delineating surgical boundaries relative to ictal-onset zones and eloquent cortex.

Learn how to interpret and use intracranial EEG findings.

Epilepsy surgery is the therapy of choice for many patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Recognizing and describing ictal and interictal patterns with intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) recordings is important in order to most efficiently leverage advantages of this technique to accurately delineate the seizure-onset zone before undergoing surgery. In this seminar in epileptology, we address learning objective "1.4.11 Recognize and describe ictal and interictal patterns with intracranial recordings" of the International League against Epilepsy curriculum for epileptologists. We will review principal considerations of the implantation planning, summarize the literature for the most relevant ictal and interictal EEG patterns within and beyond the Berger frequency spectrum, review invasive stimulation for seizure and functional mapping, discuss caveats in the interpretation of intracranial EEG findings, provide an overview on special considerations in children and in subdural grids/strips, and review available quantitative/signal analysis approaches. To be as practically oriented as possible, we will provide a mini atlas of the most frequent EEG patterns, highlight pearls for its not infrequently challenging interpretation, and conclude with two illustrative case examples. This article shall serve as a useful learning resource for trainees in clinical neurophysiology/epileptology by providing a basic understanding on the concepts of invasive intracranial EEG.

Evaluation of connectivity measures to identify Seizure Onset and Propagation Zones in Refractory Epilepsy: A Case study with two different Post- Surgical Outcomes.

High Frequency Oscillations (HFO) have been found very useful in refractory epilepsy. They have been used to identify the epileptogenic zone and as a promising clinical biomarker for presurgical evaluation in childhood epilepsy. There is controversy about whether there is a spread of HFOs and their propagation. Some researchers reinforce the idea of dealing with epilepsy as a network disorder, so the fact of propagation can promote this research. The hypothesis of this study is that connectivity methods can be useful to detect the seizure onset and propagation zones. Methodology has been applied to two cases where the clinical outcomes after surgery were free of seizures and not free. Promising results were obtained to understand both situations. A future study with more cases is necessary to obtain strong conclusions.Clinical Relevance- This exploratory study shows the relationship between connectivity measures and the propagation of HFOs and this can be useful to know the epileptogenic function of these waves that, nowadays, are unknown. Connectivity features in conjunction with other multivariate estimators can be a tool to help in identifying the regions of interest in refractory epilepsy.

Lack of spontaneous typical seizures during intracranial monitoring with stereo-electroencephalography.

OBJECTIVE: In the presurgical evaluation of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), occasionally, patients do not experience spontaneous typical seizures (STS) during a stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) study, which limits its effectiveness. We sought to identify risk factors for patients who did not have STS during SEEG and to analyze the clinical outcomes for this particular set of patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients with DRE who underwent depth electrode implantation and SEEG recordings between January 2013 and December 2018. RESULTS: SEEG was performed in 155 cases during this period. 11 (7.2%) did not experience any clinical seizures (non-STS group), while 143 experienced at least one patient-typical seizure during admission (STS group). No significant differences were found between STS and non-STS groups in terms of patient demographics, lesional/non-lesional epilepsy ratio, pre-SEEG seizure frequency, number of ASMs used, electrographic seizures or postoperative seizure outcome in those who underwent resective surgery. Statistically significant differences were found in the average number of electrodes implanted (7.0 in the non-STS group vs. 10.2 in STS), days in Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (21.8 vs. 12.8 days) and the number of cases that underwent resective surgery following SEEG (27.3% vs. 60.8%), respectively. The three non-STS patients (30%) who underwent surgery, all had their typical seizures triggered during ECS studies. Three cases were found to have psychogenic non-epileptic seizures. None of the patients in the non-STS group were offered neurostimulation devices. Five of the non-STS patients experienced transient seizure improvement following SEEG. SIGNIFICANCE: We were unable to identify any factors that predicted lack of seizures during SEEG recordings. Resective surgery was only offered in cases where ECS studies replicated patient-typical seizures. Larger datasets are required to be able to identify factors that predict which patients will fail to develop seizures during SEEG.

Genetic testing in children enrolled in epilepsy surgery program. A real-life study.

OBJECTIVE: Although genetic causes of drug-resistant focal epilepsy and selected focal malformations of cortical development (MCD) have been described, a limited number of studies comprehensively analysed genetic diagnoses in patients undergoing pre-surgical evaluation, their outcomes and the effect of genetic diagnosis on surgical strategy. METHODS: We analysed a prospective cohort of children enrolled in epilepsy surgery program over January 2018-July 2022. The majority of patients underwent germline and/or somatic genetic testing. We searched for predictors of surgical outcome and positive result of germline genetic testing. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were enrolled in epilepsy surgery program and 64 underwent resective epilepsy surgery. We ascertained germline genetic diagnosis in 13/74 patients having underwent germline gene testing (pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in CHRNA4, NPRL3, DEPDC5, FGF12, GRIA2, SZT2, STXBP1) and identified three copy number variants. Thirty-five patients underwent somatic gene testing; we detected 10 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in genes SLC35A2, PTEN, MTOR, DEPDC5, NPRL3. Germline genetic diagnosis was significantly associated with the diagnosis of focal epilepsy with unknown seizure onset. SIGNIFICANCE: Germline and somatic gene testing can ascertain a definite genetic diagnosis in a significant subgroup of patients in epilepsy surgery programs. Diagnosis of focal genetic epilepsy may tip the scales against the decision to proceed with invasive EEG study or surgical resection; however, selected patients with genetic focal epilepsies associated with MCD may benefit from resective epilepsy surgery and therefore, a genetic diagnosis does not disqualify patients from presurgical evaluation and epilepsy surgery.

Experiences of adults living with refractory epilepsy and their views and expectations on receiving results from whole genome sequencing.

INTRODUCTION: Researchers, clinicians and patients are turning to new innovations in research and clinical practice to further their knowledge in the genetic domain and improve diagnostics or treatment. However, with increased knowledge in genetics, societal issues may arise. Being conscious of these issues is crucial in order to implement standardized and efficient testing on a wider scale that is accessible to a greater number of individuals while simultaneously returning test results, including incidental findings, in a timely manner. METHODS: Within the framework of a genomics research project, we invited 20 participants who suffer from refractory epilepsy to provide insight on their personal experiences with epilepsy, as well as their thoughts on receiving Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) results and with whom they would feel comfortable sharing these results with. RESULTS: All participants had their own unique experience with epilepsy, such as how they handled their diagnosis, their struggles following the diagnosis, the healthcare services they received, how they shared their diagnosis with others, and how they managed stigmatization from others. Most participants would be eager to know their WGS results, whether the results be related to epilepsy (n = 19), response to pharmaceutical drugs including AEDs (n = 16), comorbidities (n = 19) and incidental findings (n = 15). CONCLUSION: Our findings reinforce the need to improve access to genetic testing for epilepsy patients in clinical settings. Furthermore, while acquiring more genetic knowledge (i.e. WGS) about epilepsy can provide answers for the affected population, it also requires the simultaneous involvement of several medical disciplines, with greater emphasis on genetic and psychological counseling.

Optimizing detection and deep learning-based classification of pathological high-frequency oscillations in epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore sensitive detection methods for pathological high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) to improve seizure outcomes in epilepsy surgery. METHODS: We analyzed interictal HFOs (80-500 Hz) in 15 children with medication-resistant focal epilepsy who underwent chronic intracranial electroencephalogram via subdural grids. The HFOs were assessed using the short-term energy (STE) and Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) detectors and examined for spike association and time-frequency plot characteristics. A deep learning (DL)-based classification was applied to purify pathological HFOs. Postoperative seizure outcomes were correlated with HFO-resection ratios to determine the optimal HFO detection method. RESULTS: The MNI detector identified a higher percentage of pathological HFOs than the STE detector, but some pathological HFOs were detected only by the STE detector. HFOs detected by both detectors had the highest spike association rate. The Union detector, which detects HFOs identified by either the MNI or STE detector, outperformed other detectors in predicting postoperative seizure outcomes using HFO-resection ratios before and after DL-based purification. CONCLUSIONS: HFOs detected by standard automated detectors displayed different signal and morphological characteristics. DL-based classification effectively purified pathological HFOs. SIGNIFICANCE: Enhancing the detection and classification methods of HFOs will improve their utility in predicting postoperative seizure outcomes.

Adult epilepsy.

Epilepsy is a common medical condition that affects people of all ages, races, social classes, and geographical regions. Diagnosis of epilepsy remains clinical, and ancillary investigations (electroencephalography, imaging, etc) are of aid to determine the type, cause, and prognosis. Antiseizure medications represent the mainstay of epilepsy treatment: they aim to suppress seizures without adverse events, but they do not affect the underlying predisposition to generate seizures. Currently available antiseizure medications are effective in around two-thirds of patients with epilepsy. Neurosurgical resection is an effective strategy to reach seizure control in selected individuals with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Non-pharmacological treatments such as palliative surgery (eg, corpus callosotomy), neuromodulation techniques (eg, vagus nerve stimulation), and dietary interventions represent therapeutic options for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who are not suitable for resective brain surgery.

Predictors of referral for long-term EEG monitoring for Medicare beneficiaries with drug-resistant epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: For people with drug-resistant epilepsy, the use of epilepsy surgery is low despite favorable odds of seizure freedom. To better understand surgery utilization, we explored factors associated with inpatient long-term EEG monitoring (LTM), the first step of the presurgical pathway. METHODS: Using 2001-2018 Medicare files, we identified patients with incident drug-resistant epilepsy using validated criteria of ≥2 distinct antiseizure medication (ASM) prescriptions and ≥1 drug-resistant epilepsy encounter among patients with ≥2 years pre- and ≥1 year post-diagnosis Medicare enrollment. We used multilevel logistic regression to evaluate associations between LTM and patient, provider, and geographic factors. We then analyzed neurologist-diagnosed patients to further evaluate provider/environmental characteristics. RESULTS: Of 12 044 patients with incident drug-resistant epilepsy diagnosis identified, 2% underwent surgery. Most (68%) were diagnosed by a neurologist. In total, 19% underwent LTM near/after drug-resistant epilepsy diagnosis; another 4% only underwent LTM much prior to diagnosis. Patient factors most strongly predicting LTM were age <65 (adjusted odds ratio 1.5 [95% confidence interval 1.3-1.8]), focal epilepsy (1.6 [1.4-1.9]), psychogenic non-epileptic spells diagnosis (1.6 [1.1-2.5]) prior hospitalization (1.7, [1.5-2]), and epilepsy center proximity (1.6 [1.3-1.9]). Additional predictors included female gender, Medicare/Medicaid non-dual eligibility, certain comorbidities, physician specialties, regional neurologist density, and prior LTM. Among neurologist-diagnosed patients, neurologist <10 years from graduation, near an epilepsy center, or epilepsy-specialized increased LTM likelihood (1.5 [1.3-1.9], 2.1 [1.8-2.5], 2.6 [2.1-3.1], respectively). In this model, 37% of variation in LTM completion near/after diagnosis was explained by individual neurologist practice and/or environment rather than measurable patient factors (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.37). SIGNIFICANCE: A small proportion of Medicare beneficiaries with drug-resistant epilepsy completed LTM, a proxy for epilepsy surgery referral. While some patient factors and access measures predicted LTM, non-patient factors explained a sizable proportion of variance in LTM completion. To increase surgery utilization, these data suggest initiatives targeting better support of neurologist referral.

Functional connectivity discriminates epileptogenic states and predicts surgical outcome in children with drug resistant epilepsy.

Normal brain functioning emerges from a complex interplay among regions forming networks. In epilepsy, these networks are disrupted causing seizures. Highly connected nodes in these networks are epilepsy surgery targets. Here, we assess whether functional connectivity (FC) using intracranial electroencephalography can quantify brain regions epileptogenicity and predict surgical outcome in children with drug resistant epilepsy (DRE). We computed FC between electrodes on different states (i.e. interictal without spikes, interictal with spikes, pre-ictal, ictal, and post-ictal) and frequency bands. We then estimated the electrodes' nodal strength. We compared nodal strength between states, inside and outside resection for good- (n = 22, Engel I) and poor-outcome (n = 9, Engel II-IV) patients, respectively, and tested their utility to predict the epileptogenic zone and outcome. We observed a hierarchical epileptogenic organization among states for nodal strength: lower FC during interictal and pre-ictal states followed by higher FC during ictal and post-ictal states (p < 0.05). We further observed higher FC inside resection (p < 0.05) for good-outcome patients on different states and bands, and no differences for poor-outcome patients. Resection of nodes with high FC was predictive of outcome (positive and negative predictive values: 47-100%). Our findings suggest that FC can discriminate epileptogenic states and predict outcome in patients with DRE.

Pediatric epilepsy surgery from 2000 to 2018: Changes in referral and surgical volumes, patient characteristics, genetic testing, and postsurgical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Neurosurgery is a safe and effective form of treatment for select children with drug-resistant epilepsy. Still, there is concern that it remains underutilized, and that seizure freedom rates have not improved over time. We investigated referral and surgical practices, patient characteristics, and postoperative outcomes over the past two decades. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of children referred for epilepsy surgery at a tertiary center between 2000 and 2018. We extracted information from medical records and analyzed temporal trends using regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 1443 children were evaluated for surgery. Of these, 859 (402 females) underwent surgical resection or disconnection at a median age of 8.5 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 4.6-13.4). Excluding palliative procedures, 67% of patients were seizure-free and 15% were on no antiseizure medication (ASM) at 1-year follow-up. There was an annual increase in the number of referrals (7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.3-8.6; p < .001) and surgeries (4% [95% CI = 2.9-5.6], p < .001) over time. Duration of epilepsy and total number of different ASMs trialed from epilepsy onset to surgery were, however, unchanged, and continued to exceed guidelines. Seizure freedom rates were also unchanged overall but showed improvement (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% CI = 1.01-1.18; p = .027) after adjustment for an observed increase in complex cases. Children who underwent surgery more recently were more likely to be off ASMs postoperatively (OR 1.04, 95% CI = 1.01-1.08; p = .013). There was a 17% annual increase (95% CI = 8.4-28.4, p < .001) in children identified to have a genetic cause of epilepsy, which was associated with poor outcome. SIGNIFICANCE: Children with drug-resistant epilepsy continue to be put forward for surgery late, despite national and international guidelines urging prompt referral. Seizure freedom rates have improved over the past decades, but only after adjustment for a concurrent increase in complex cases. Finally, genetic testing in epilepsy surgery patients has expanded considerably over time and shows promise in identifying patients in whom surgery is less likely to be successful.

Protocol of a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial of robot-assisted stereotactic lesioning in the treatment of focal drug-resistant epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: This protocol describes the design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial of robot-assisted stereotactic lesioning versus epileptogenic foci resection. Typical causes of focal epilepsy include hippocampal sclerosis and focal cortical dysplasia. These patients usually present with drug resistance and require surgical treatment. Although epileptogenic foci resection is still the most commonly used treatment for such focal epilepsy, there is increasing evidence that epileptogenic focus resection may lead to neurological impairment. The treatment of epilepsy with a robot-assisted stereotactic lesioning mainly includes two new minimally invasive surgical methods: radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RF-TC) and laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT). Seizure-free is less likely to be achieved by these two procedures, but neurologic preservation is better. In this study, we aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of RF-TC, LITT, and epileptogenic foci resection for focal drug-resistant epilepsy. METHODS: This is a multicenter, three-arm, randomized controlled clinical trial. The study will include patients older than 3 years of age with epilepsy who have had medically refractory seizures for at least 2 years and are eligible for surgical treatment with an epileptogenic focus as determined by multidisciplinary evaluation prior to randomization. The primary outcome measure is seizure outcome (quantified by seizure remission rate) at 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year follow-up after treatment. Postoperative neurologic impairment, spectrum distribution change of video electroencephalogram, quality of life, and medical costs will also be assessed as secondary outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trials Registry ChiCTR2200060974. Registered on June 14, 2022. The status of the trial is recruiting, and the estimated study completion date is December 31, 2024.

Identifying epilepsy surgery candidates with natural language processing: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Epilepsy surgery is an underutilised, efficacious management strategy for selected individuals with drug-resistant epilepsy. Natural language processing (NLP) may aid in the identification of patients who are suitable to undergo evaluation for epilepsy surgery. The feasibility of this approach is yet to be determined. METHOD: In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review of the databases PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library was performed. This systematic review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO. RESULTS: 6 studies fulfilled inclusion criteria. The majority of included studies reported on datasets from only a single centre, with one study utilising data from two centres and one study six centres. The most commonly employed algorithms were support vector machines (5/6), with only one study utilising NLP strategies such as random forest models and gradient boosted machines. However, the results are promising, with all studies demonstrating moderate to high levels of performance in the identification of patients who may be suitable to undergo epilepsy surgery evaluation. Furthermore, multiple studies demonstrated that NLP could identify such patients 1-2 years prior to the treating clinicians instigating referral. However, no studies were identified that have evaluated the influence of implementing such algorithms on healthcare systems or patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: NLP is a promising approach to aid in the identification of patients that may be suitable to undergo epilepsy surgery evaluation. Further studies are required examining diverse datasets with additional analytical methodologies. Studies evaluating the impact of implementation of such algorithms would be beneficial.

Integration of interictal EEG source localization in presurgical epilepsy evaluation - A single-center prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate cost in working hours for initial integration of interictal EEG source localization (ESL) into clinical practice of a tertiary epilepsy center, and to examine concordance of results obtained with three different ESL pipelines. METHODS: This prospective study covered the first year of using ESL in the Epilepsy-Center Berlin-Brandenburg. Patients aged ≥14 years with drug-resistant focal epilepsy referred for noninvasive presurgical evaluation were included. Interictal ESL was based on low-density EEG and individual head models. Source maxima were obtained from two freely available software packages and one commercial provider. One physician and computer scientist documented their working hours for setting up and processing ESL. Additionally, a survey was conducted among epilepsy centers in Germany to assess the current role of ESL in presurgical evaluation. RESULTS: Of 40 patients included, 22 (55%) had enough interictal spikes for ESL. The physician's working times decreased from median 4.7 hours [interquartile range 3.9-6.4] in the first third of cases to 2.0 hours [1.9-2.4] in the remaining two thirds; P < 0.01. In addition, computer scientist and physician spent a total of 35.5 and 33.0 working hours on setting up the digital infrastructure, and on training and testing. Sublobar agreement between all three pipelines was 20%, mean measurement of agreement (kappa) 0.13. Finally, the survey revealed that 53% of epilepsy centers in Germany currently use ESL for presurgical evaluation. SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides information regarding expected effort and costs for integration of ESL into an epilepsy surgery program. Low result agreement across different ESL pipelines calls for further standardization.