Perineal outcomes and its associated variables of water births versus non-water births: a cross-sectional study / Desfechos perineais e as variáveis associadas no parto na água e no parto fora da água: estudo transversal

Abstract Objectives: to describe the perineal outcomes of women who had delivered in water and out of water. Methods: a cross-sectional and quantitative study developed in a public hospital in Setúbal, Portugal. The population was of women who participated in the "Water Birth Project" in the period from 2011 to 2014, which gave birth in water and out of water. 104 women were selected according to established inclusion criteria. The groups were compared according to the following variables: demographics, obstetric information, delivery care and perineal outcomes. The data were analyzed in the Stata(r) software, with descriptive and bivariate statistics (chi-square and Fisher's test). Results: the medical records of 73 women who gave birth in water and 31 women who gave birth out of water were studied. Water deliveries were significantly associated with fewer perineal lacerations, lower rates of episiotomy, and shorter delivery time. Conclusions: the results of the study suggest that childbirth in water has a protective effect against severe third or fourth degree perineal tears, during fetal expulsion in water.

Resumo Objetivos: descrever os resultados perineais de mulheres que tiveram parto na água e fora da água. Métodos: estudo transversal e quantitativo desenvolvido em um hospital público de Setúbal, Portugal. A população foi de mulheres que participaram do "Projeto Parto na Água", no período de 2011 a 2014, que deram à luz na água e fora da água. Foram selecionadas para o estudo 104 mulheres de acordo com os critérios de inclusão estabelecidos. Os grupos foram comparados de acordo com as seguintes variáveis: demografia, informação obstétrica, assistência ao parto e resultados perineais. Os dados foram analisados no software Stata(r), com estatísitica descritiva e bivariada (qui-quadrado e teste de Fisher). Resultados: foram estudados os prontuários de 73 mulheres que deram à luz na água e 31 mulheres que deram à luz fora da água. Os partos na água foram significativamente associados a menos lacerações perineais, menores taxas de episiotomia e menor tempo de parto. Conclusão: os resultados do estudo sugerem que o parto na água tem um efeito protetor contra lacerações perineais severas de terceiro ou de quarto grau durante a expulsão fetal na água.

Long-term effects of episiotomy on urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To focus attention on the long-term effects of episiotomy on urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted including only studies with mean follow-up ≥ 5 years. We searched using combinations of the following keywords and text words: "episiotomy", "perineal laceration", "perineal tear", "perineal damage" and "long term", "long term outcomes", "prolapse", "pelvic organ prolapse", "pelvic floor", "pelvic floor dysfunction", "urinary incontinence", "hysterocele", "cystocele" and "rectocele". RESULTS: The electronic database search provided a total of 6154 results. After exclusions, 24 studies were included yielding the following results: (1) episiotomy might be detrimental with respect to urinary incontinence symptoms; (2) the relationship between episiotomy and anti-incontinence surgery is not clear; (3) episiotomy does not seem to negatively influence genital prolapse development and might even be protective with respect to prolapse severity and prevalence; (4) episiotomy does not seem to affect genital prolapse surgery rate. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find evidence for a long-term beneficial effect of episiotomy in the prevention of urinary incontinence symptoms and anti-incontinence surgery. Episiotomy does not seem to negatively influence genital prolapse development and might even be protective with respect to prolapse severity and prevalence without affecting surgery rates.

Frecuencia de desgarros perineales en pacientes primíparas con y sin episiotomía durante un parto vaginal / Frequency of perineal tears in primiparous patients with and without episiotomy during a vaginal birth

This report details the frequency of perineal tears in primiparous patients with and without episiotomy, curing a vaginal delivery. Episiotomy is the surgical incision on the perineum to enlarge the vaginal opening for obstetrical purposes during the birth process for widening the oulet of the birth canal to facilitate delivery. From the present study it becomes evident that the women submitted to restrictive episiotomy showed less anterior and posterior perineal tears comparing with those without the previous episiotomy. It is considered that the implementation of a restrictive episiotomy is a valid tool that should be used by qualified personal with experience in the technique and the repairment

[Advantage of extralevator abdominoperineal excision comparing to the conventional abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer: a Meta-analysis].

OBJECTIVE: Whether extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) improves survival and safety remains controversial. Systematic review of all comparative studies to define the superiority of ELAPE to conventional abdominoperineal excision (APE).
 Methods: Corresponding data, with case-control studies or cohorts regarding intraoperative perforation rate, the local recurrence rate and postoperative complications in the ELAPE group and the APE group, were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Literature (CMB), VIP, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Database. Meta-analysis was performed by using RenMan 5.2.
 Results: A total of 10 articles were included. Intraperative perforation rate (MD=0.54, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.39, P=0.03), local recurrence rate (MD=0.30, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.42, P<0.001) in the ELAPE group was significantly lower than that in the APE group. The difference in positive margin rate between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (P=0.07).
 Conclusion: Through gap repair of episiotomy and individualized therapy can improve ELAPE postoperative quality of life. ELAPE shows certain advantages in treating lower rectal cancer comparing to APE, but it should pay attention to individualized treatment. More studies through large sample multi-center, medium and long term randomized design are necessary to determine the effect of surgery on tumor.

To cut or not to cut, that is the question: A review of the anatomy, the technique, risks, and benefits of an episiotomy.

Childbirth can be a traumatic experience on the female body. Some techniques may be implemented to make the process smoother and decrease the potential lacerations that can occur. Episiotomies have been used by obstetricians and midwives to help make the fetal decent down the vaginal canal less turbulent. A physician must use his best judgment on when it is necessary to make this incision and what form of incision to make. Before making an incision one must understand the female external and internal anatomy and thoroughly comprehend the stages of birth to understand how and what complications can occur. Even though an episiotomy is a minor incision, it is still a surgical incision nonetheless and as with any form of surgery there are both risks and benefits that are to be considered. Nevertheless, episiotomies have proven to help ease births that are complicated by shoulder dystocia, prevent severe lacerations, and decrease the second stage of labor. The following comprehensive review provides a description of the female anatomy, as well as an extensive description of why, when, and how an episiotomy is done. Clin. Anat. 30:362-372, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Selective Episiotomy: Indications, Techinique, and Association with Severe Perineal Lacerations / Episiotomia seletiva nos dias atuais: indicações, técnica e associação com lacerações perineais graves

Abstract Introduction Episiotomy is a controversial procedure, especially because the discussion that surrounds it has gone beyond the field of scientific debate, being adopted as an indicator of the "humanization of childbirth". The scientific literature indicates that episiotomy should not be performed routinely, but selectively. Objectives To review the literature in order to assess whether the implementation of selective episiotomy protects against severe perineal lacerations, the indications for the procedure, and the best technique to perform it. Methods A literature search was performed in PubMed using the terms episiotomy or perineal lacerations, and the filter clinical trial. The articles concerning the risk of severe perineal lacerations with or without episiotomy, perineal protection, or episiotomy techniques were selected. Results A total of 141 articles were identified, and 24 of them were included in the review. Out of the 13 studies that evaluated the risk of severe lacerations with and without episiotomy, 5 demonstrated a protective role of selective episiotomy, and 4 showed no significant differences between the groups. Three small studies confirmed the finding that episiotomy should be performed selectively and not routinely, and one study showed that midline episiotomy increased the risk of severe lacerations. The most cited indications were primiparity, fetal weight greater than 4 kg, prolonged second stage, operative delivery, and shoulder dystocia. As for the surgical technique, episiotomies performed with wider angles (> 40°) and earlier in the second stage (before "crowning ") appeared to be more protective. Conclusions Selective episiotomy decreases the risk of severe lacerations when compared with the non-performance or the performance of routine episiotomy. The use of a proper surgical technique is fundamental to obtain better results, especially in relation to the angle of incision, the distance from the vaginal introitus, and the correct timing for performing the procedure. Not performing the episiotomy when indicated or not applying the correct technique may increase the risk of severe perineal lacerations.

Resumo Introdução A episiotomia é um procedimento controverso, devido, em parte, à discussão sobre sua realização ter ultrapassado o campo do debate cientifico, sendo adotada como indicador associado com a "humanização do parto." A literatura mostra que a episiotomia não deve ser realizada rotineiramente, mas de forma seletiva. Questões relativas à sua indicação, técnica de realização e associação com lacerações perineais graves são objeto de amplo debate e pesquisa. Objetivos Revisar a literatura para avaliar se a realização da episiotomia seletiva protege contra lacerações perineais graves, quais são suas indicações, e qual a melhor técnica para realizar este procedimento. Método Foi realizada busca no PubMed com os termos episiotomy ou perineal lacerations utilizando o filtro clinical trial. Foram selecionados os artigos que tratavam do risco de lacerações perineais graves com e sem episiotomia, ou de técnicas de proteção perineal ou de episiotomia. Resultados Foram identificados 141 artigos, dos quais 24 foram incluídos na revisão. Dos 13 estudos que avaliaram o risco de lacerações graves com e sem episiotomia, 5 demonstraram o papel protetor da episiotomia seletiva, e 4 não mostraram diferenças significativas entre os grupos. Três pequenos estudos confirmaram o achado de que a episiotomia deve ser realizada seletiva e não rotineiramente, e um estudo mostrou que a episiotomia mediana aumenta o risco de lacerações graves. Quanto às indicações, as mais citadas foram a primiparidade, peso fetal maior do que 4kg, período expulsivo prolongado, parto operatório e distocia de ombro. Quanto à técnica, episiotomias realizadas com ângulos mais abertos (> 40°) e mais precocemente no período expulsivo (antes do "coroamento") parecem ser mais protetoras. Conclusões Episiotomias seletivas reduzem o risco de lacerações graves comparativamente à não realização de episiotomia ou à realização de episiotomia rotineira. Para esse resultado, é fundamental a utilização de técnica operatória correta, principalmente em relação ao ângulo de inclinação e distância da fúrcula vaginal, além do momento de sua realização. Deixar de realizar a episiotomia, com a técnica correta e quando bem indicada, pode aumentar o risco de lacerações perineais graves.

Evaluation of in vivo properties of Velosorb™ fast versus Vicryl™ rapide in a functional rabbit model of intradermic suture and episiotomy.

OBJECTIVE: Fast-absorbing polyglactin 910 is commonly used to suture skin and vaginal incisions. In vitro studies have shown similar tensile strength properties between Velosorb™ Fast and Vicryl™ Rapide (Al-Qattan MM. J Hand Surg Br Eur. 2005;30(1):90-91). This randomized study compared Velosorb™ Fast (Covidien) with Vicryl™ Rapide (Ethicon) in a rabbit model of intradermic suture and episiotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized prospective study was performed on 20 New Zealand rabbits, in which we realized a mediolateral perineo-vaginal incision and two vertical skin incisions of about 8 cm on the abdominal wall. The sutures were randomized between Velosorb™ Fast (Covidien) and Vicryl™ Rapide (Ethicon), and each rabbit was treated with the same suture on both vaginal incision and left abdominal incision, while the right abdominal incision was closed with an alternate suture. A macroscopic examination was performed on days 5 and 11. On day 11, animals were sacrificed for histological (Badylak quantitative score) and electron microscopic examinations. Differences were considered significant at p < .05. RESULTS: All of the rabbits survived and were included in the final results. Fifty-one sutures were visible by histologic analysis (27 in the Velosorb™ Fast group and 24 in the Vicryl™ Rapide group). The power of the study was ≥80%. There was no significant difference between the two groups based on the total histologic Badylak score analysis or the Badylak sub-score analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Velosorb™ Fast seems to be as efficient as Vicryl™ Rapide for use in perineal and skin closure.

Parturient perineal distensibility tolerance assessed by EPI-NO: an observational study / Tolerância da parturiente à extensibilidade perineal avaliada pelo EPI-NO: estudo observacional / Tolerância da parturiente à extensibilidade perineal avaliada pelo EPI-NO: estudo observacional

Objective : To determine how parturient women tolerate the use of a perineal distensibility assessment technique using the EPI-NO device. Methods : An observational study with a total of 227 full-term parturient women was performed. During the evaluation with EPI-NO, parturient patients were asked about their sensation of discomfort. The degree of discomfort was measured using the Visual Analogue Scale, with a score from zero to 10. The Mann-Whitney test was applied to assess perineal distensibility measured by EPI-NO and the degree of discomfort caused by the test according to parity. The relation between perineal distensibility and discomfort was analyzed by using the Spearman correlation test (r). Results : The test with EPI-NO caused only slight discomfort (mean Visual Analogue Scale of 3.8), and primiparous women reported significantly greater discomfort (mean Visual Analogue Scale of 4.5) than did multiparous (mean Visual Analogue Scale=3.1), with p<0.001 women. A negative correlation was observed, in other words, the greater the perineal distensibility on the EPI-NO, the lower the pain reported by the patients (r=-0.424; p<0.001). Conclusion : The assessment of perineal distensibility with EPI-NO was well tolerated by the parturient women. .

Objetivo : Determinar como a mulher parturiente tolera o uso de uma nova técnica de extensibilidade perineal, por meio do aparelho EPI-NO. Métodos : Estudo observacional com um total de 227 gestantes a termo. Durante a avaliação pelo EPI-NO, as parturientes foram perguntadas sobre a sensação de desconforto. O grau de desconforto foi medido usando a Escala Visual Analógica, com escore entre zero a 10. O teste de Mann-Whitney foi usado para avaliar a extensibilidade perineal avaliada pelo EPI-NO e o grau de desconforto causado pelo teste de acordo com a paridade. A relação entre extensibilidade perineal e desconforto foi avaliada pelo teste de correlação de Spearman (r). Resultados : O teste com EPI-NO causou apenas leve desconforto (média da Escala Visual Analógica de 3,8), sendo que as primíparas reportaram mais desconforto de modo significativo (média da Escala Visual Analógica de 4,5) que as multíparas (média da Escala Visual Analógica de 3,1), com p<0,001. Observou-se correlação negativa, ou seja, a maior extensibilidade no EPI-NO foi acompanhada de menor dor referida pelas pacientes (r=-0,424; p<0,001). Conclusão : A avaliação da extensibilidade perineal com EPI-NO foi bem tolerada pelas parturientes. .

Clinical evaluation of peripartum outcomes of mediolateral versus lateral episiotomy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence and extent of vaginal and perineal trauma among primiparous women after mediolateral and lateral episiotomy. METHODS: In a prospective randomized study at University Hospital Pilsen, Czech Republic, 790 consecutive primiparous women were enrolled between April 2010 and April 2012. Mediolateral episiotomy (MLE) followed an angle of at least 60° from the midline. Lateral episiotomy (LE) started 1-2 cm laterally from the midline and was directed toward the ischial tuberosity. A rectal examination was performed before episiotomy repair. RESULTS: MLE was performed for 390 women, and LE for 400. The groups did not differ in maternal or neonatal characteristics. No difference was found in incidence or extent of vaginal and perineal trauma; or in additional perineal (1.8% vs 1.5%, P=0.6) or vaginal (8.5% vs 10.6%, P=0.2) trauma continuing along the episiotomy incision. The incidence of anal sphincter injury did not differ between MLE and LE (1.5% vs 1.3%, P=0.7). MLE was associated with shorter repair times (P<0.05), less suturing material (P<0.05), and shorter distances from the anus (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Risk of additional vaginal and perineal trauma, and anal sphincter injury after adequately performed mediolateral episiotomy is relatively low and corresponds to that of lateral episiotomy.

Giant recurrent perineal endometriosis in an episiotomy scar--a case report.

The occurrence of perineal endometriotic lesions can be explained by mechanical dissemination and transplantation of endometrial cells. Viable decidual endometrial cells are likely to be transplanted into the episiotomy wounds or perineal tears during normal vaginal delivery and subsequent growth may occur A case of a 33-year old woman with a medical history of recurrent perineal endometriosis was described. An endometriotic giant mass (8 centimeter in diameter) was wide-excised, together with the episiotomy scar. The recovery was uneventful. Three years after the surgery, the patient is symptom-free and with no signs of recurrence or discomfort. According to the literature and our own experience, a complete excision of endometriotic tissue is the treatment of choice. We can conclude that a wide excision is mandatory as it is the only way to prevent tumor recurrence.

Critical obstetric and gynecologic procedures in the emergency department.

Obstetric and gynecologic emergencies are common reasons for emergency department visits. Therefore, emergency physicians must be proficient in the management and treatment of these emergencies. This article reviews critical procedures and provides an overview of each procedure and the indications, contraindications, technique, and potential complications.

Hysteroscopy and episiotomy in a rescued, cold-stressed Florida manatee (Trichechus manatus latirostris) for diagnosis and treatment of a retained fetal skeleton.

A rescued female manatee was observed expelling a fetal bone from the vulva. The manatee was anesthetized and diagnosed with uterine retention of a fetal skeleton by ultrasound and hysteroscopy. Episiotomy was performed to gain manual access to the vagina and uterus for removal of the skeleton. Second intention healing of the episiotomy site produced excellent results. Rescued female manatees should receive a thorough reproductive tract evaluation since presence of retained fetal tissues might not be evident in blood or hormone analyses. Retention of a whole or partial dead fetus can be life-threatening to manatees, and retained tissues should be removed as early as possible.

Obstetric trauma, pelvic floor injury and fecal incontinence: a population-based case-control study.

OBJECTIVES: Current concepts based on referral center data suggest that pelvic floor injury from obstetric trauma is a major risk factor for fecal incontinence (FI) in women. In contrast, a majority of community women only develop FI decades after vaginal delivery, and obstetric events are not independent risk factors for FI. However, obstetric events are imperfect surrogates for anal and pelvic floor injury, which is often clinically occult. Hence, the objectives of this study were to evaluate the relationship between prior obstetric events, pelvic floor injury, and FI among community women. METHODS: In this nested case-control study of 68 women with FI (cases; mean age 57 years) and 68 age-matched controls from a population-based cohort in Olmsted County, MN, pelvic floor anatomy and motion during voluntary contraction and defecation were assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Obstetric events and bowel habits were recorded. RESULTS: By multivariable analysis, internal sphincter injury (cases-28%, controls-6%; odds ratio (OR): 8.8; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.3-34) and reduced perineal descent during defecation (cases-2.6 ± 0.2 cm, controls-3.1 ± 0.2 cm; OR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.2-2.4) increased FI risk, but external sphincter injury (cases-25%, controls-4%; P<0.005) was not independently predictive. Puborectalis injury was associated (P<0.05) with impaired anorectal motion during squeeze, but was not independently associated with FI. Grades 3-4 episiotomy (OR: 3.9; 95% CI: 1.4-11) but not other obstetric events increased the risk for pelvic floor injury. Heavy smoking (≥ 20 pack-years) was associated (P=0.052) with external sphincter atrophy. CONCLUSIONS: State-of-the-art imaging techniques reveal pelvic floor injury or abnormal anorectal motion in a minority of community women with FI. Internal sphincter injury and reduced perineal descent during defecation are independent risk factors for FI. In addition to grades 3-4 episiotomy, smoking may be a potentially preventable, risk factor for pelvic floor injury.

Importancia del ángulo de la episiotomía / Significance of the angle of episiotomy

La metodología de los estudios que evalúan el papel de la episiotomía mediolateral carece de la calidad necesaria y no puede extraerse actualmente de ellos conclusión alguna acerca del traumatismo perineal grave y la incontinencia anal. Se identificaron cuatro problemas: la definición y la ejecución práctica de la episiotomía mediolateral, y el diagnóstico y clasificación del traumatismo perineal. La definición y ejecución de la episiotomía mediolateral difieren ampliamente entre las distintas instituciones y los distintos individuos. El problema principal es la precisión de la dirección elegida. Se introdujeron tres términos: ángulo de incisión, de sutura y de cicatrización de episiotomía. Anteriormente, la episiotomía mediolateral se definía por un ángulo de incisión mínimo de 40°. Sin embargo,cuando se incide a 40°, el ángulo mediano luego de la reparación era de 20°, mientras que el ángulo de cicatrización era de 30° en los casos de desgarros de tercer grado frente a 38° en los controles. Al usar un ángulo de incisión de 60°, el ángulo mediano de sutura fue de 45° y el de cicatrización de 48°. Actualmente se propone que la episiotomía mediolateral se defina como “una incisión en el perineo durante la última parte de la segunda etapa del trabajo de parto, que comienza en el perineo medial pero se dirige lateralmente en un ángulo de al menos 60° en dirección de la tuberosidad isquial”. Se requieren más investigaciones para evaluar la seguridad de este ángulo de incisión.

Giant primary vaginal calculus secondary to vesicovaginal fistula with partial vaginal outlet obstruction in a 12-year-old girl.

A vesicovaginal fistula with vagina obstruction associated with vaginal calculi is an extremely rare medical condition. We report a giant primary vaginal calculus resulting from vesicovaginal fistula with partial vaginal outlet obstruction secondary to perineum trauma and surgery in a 12-year-old girl. Episiotomy was performed and the adhesive labia minora was split. After the removal of a giant calculus in the vagina, approximately 8 cm in diameter, the fistula tract was completely excised, followed by the repair of the vesicovagina fistula and the vagina. The patient was symptom-free at 6-month follow-up examination.

Surgeons should not hesitate to perform episioproctotomy for rectovaginal fistula secondary to cryptoglandular or obstetrical origin.

BACKGROUND: Closure of rectoanovaginal fistula from a cryptoglandular or obstetrical origin can be difficult. Multiple techniques exist and none are perfect. Although episioproctotomy offers the advantage of a simultaneous repair of the sphincter complex, it is a more extensive procedure. A rectal-advancement flap appears less traumatic and divides no perineal tissue or sphincter. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of episioproctotomy and rectal-advancement flap on healing, postoperative continence, and sexual function. METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected regarding 87 women with cryptoglandular or obstetrical rectoanovaginal fistula treated from June 1997 to 2009, who underwent episioproctotomy or rectal-advancement flap at the discretion of the treating surgeon. Healing, use of seton or stoma, number of previous procedures, smoking, age, body mass index, dyspareunia, SF-12 health survey, the IBD Quality of Life, and the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life, and the Female Sexual Function Index were obtained from our database and via telephone interviews. The Fisher exact probability and χ tests were used. RESULTS: The mean age of these 87 women was 42.8 ± 10.5 years. Mean follow-up was 49.2 ± 39.2 months. Fifty (57.5%) patients underwent episioproctotomy and 37 (42.5%) underwent rectal-advancement flap. Thirty-nine (78%) patients healed after episioproctotomy vs 23 (62.2%) patients after rectal-advancement flap (P = .1). Episioproctotomy was associated with significantly better fecal (P < .001) and sexual (P = .04) function. There was no significant difference in other studied variables between the 2 techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Despite episioproctotomy being a more extensive procedure, healing rates were comparable between episioproctotomy and rectal-advancement flaps. In this select population, episioproctotomy may provide better continence and may confer better sexual function compared with rectal-advancement flap. In appropriate patients surgeons should not hesitate to perform episioproctotomy on cryptoglandular or obstetrical-associated rectoanovaginal fistula.

[Management of postpartum vaginal haematomas by embolisation: two cases]. / L'embolisation radiologique dans le traitement du thrombus vaginal (à propos de deux observations).

Postpartum vaginal haematomas are a rare complication of delivery. The incidence of large haematomas is estimated at 1/4000 deliveries, and this complication can be life-threatening. We report two such cases. The diagnosis is suggested by shooting perineal pain with urinary tenesmus and vulvovaginal swelling or an unexplained haemorrhagic syndrome in the postpartum period. Rapid management is essential. Embolisation by interventional radiology is preferred to surgery. In the first case, arterial embolisation was performed after bilateral ligation of the hypogastric arteries failed. Arterial embolisation was the first-line treatment for the second patient. It was successful for both women.

Episiotomia seletiva: avanços baseados em evidências / Selective episiotomy: advances based on evidence

A realização de episiotomia de forma rotineira foi, durante muitos anos, um grande exemplo de prática médica adotada sem base em estudos clínicos bem conduzidos. Permanece como o segundo procedimento mais comum em obstetrícia, tendo como objetivos prevenir severos danos perineais nas mulheres submetidas ao parto normal, assim como reduzir o período expulsivo. Contudo, vários ensaios clínicos randomizados bem controlados foram publicados contestando essas verdades, além de fornecer evidências de nível I. Assim, foi realizada uma revisão da literatura de forma sistematizada, a qual incluiu estudos comparando a realização da episiotomia rotineira à seletiva. Observou-se que a realização da episiotomia rotineira não protege o assoalho pélvico, sendo causa de maior dor, sangramento e complicações intra e pós-operatórias. Baseando-se nesses resultados, não há justificativa para a manutenção da realização de episiotomia de forma rotineira. Porém, sua frequência continua sendo elevada no Brasil. Sua realização seletiva representa uma excelente oportunidade para testar a força da educação médica continuada, cientificamente embasada, e para mudar dogmas do passado. A difusão dessa prática e sua adoção nos manuais de conduta nos diferentes serviços e diretrizes das sociedades médicas é um marcador de qualidade da atenção e humanização do parto.

To perform the episiotomy as a routine way was, for many years, a medical procedure used without base in any reliable clinical trials. It remains as the second most performed procedure in obstetrics, having as goal to prevent severe damage in the perineal muscle during natural childbirth and to reduce the delivery length. However, several well-controlled randomized clinical trials has been released to refute those beliefs in addition to provide level I evidence. Therefore, a systematic literature review was made including studies that compare the routine episiotomy to the selective episiotomy. The results showed that routine episiotomy does not protect the pelvic floor causing more pain, bleeding and surgical and post-surgical complications. Based in those results, there is no reason for the use of routine episiotomy. However, its use is still common in Brazil. The selective episiotomy use is an excellent form to analyze the continuous medical education based in scientific facts and change ancients beliefs. The propagation of this practice and its presence in routine manuals are indicative of attention quality and delivery humanization.