RESUMO
RESUMO Objetivo: analisar o cotidiano de trabalho dos profissionais de saúde de uma Unidade de Pronto Atendimento (UPA), com ênfase nos estressores ocupacionais relacionados à pandemia de COVID-19. Método: estudo de caso qualitativo, fundamentado no referencial teórico-metodológico de Michel de Certeau acerca do cotidiano, realizado em uma UPA porte II do interior de Minas Gerais, Brasil. Foi realizada triangulação de dados, com observações, entrevistas com 31 profissionais e análise documental. Os dados foram organizados no MAXQDA2020® e submetidos à análise de conteúdo de Bardin. Resultados: o cotidiano da UPA foi alterado pela pandemia e a instituição passou por adaptações para atender os casos suspeitos ou confirmados de COVID-19, com novas estratégias de funcionamento e redefinição do mapa da assistência. Os estressores ocupacionais identificados foram falta de clareza nas informações iniciais sobre a doença, medo de se contaminarem ou a familiares, uso de equipamentos de proteção individual (EPIs), testagem, afastamento e sobrecarga de profissionais, risco de falta de medicamentos e estigmatização dos profissionais de saúde. Por outro lado, disponibilidade de EPIs, queda do número de atendimentos, orientações e treinamentos foram fatores protetores contra o estresse. Ademais, alguns profissionais adotaram táticas para amenizar os estressores decorrentes da pandemia. Conclusão: o cotidiano da UPA foi alterado e o estresse ocupacional relacionado à pandemia acomete profissionais de saúde. Medidas de proteção da saúde mental são necessárias para que possam enfrentar a grave crise sanitária, com vistas à prevenção do sofrimento, melhor qualidade de vida no trabalho e melhores condições laborais e de atendimento aos usuários.
RESUMEN Objetivo: analizar el trabajo diario de los profesionales de la salud en una Unidad de Cuidados de Emergencia (UPA), con énfasis en los estresores ocupacionales relacionados con la pandemia de COVID-19. Método: estudio de caso cualitativo, basado en el marco teórico-metodológico de Michel de Certeau sobre la vida cotidiana, realizado en una UPA tamaño II en el interior de Minas Gerais, Brasil. Se realizó triangulación de datos, con observaciones, entrevistas a 31 profesionales y análisis de documentos. Los datos se organizaron en MAXQDA2020® y sometidos al análisis de contenido de Bardin. Resultados: la vida cotidiana de la UPA fue modificada por la pandemia y la institución fue adaptada para atender casos sospechosos o confirmados de COVID-19, con nuevas estrategias operativas y redefinición del mapa de atención. Los estresores ocupacionales identificados fueron falta de claridad en la información inicial sobre la enfermedad, miedo a contaminarse o de familiares, uso de equipo de protección personal (EPI), pruebas, baja y sobrecarga de profesionales, riesgo de falta de medicación y estigmatización de los profesionales de la salud. Por otro lado, la disponibilidad de EPP, la disminución del número de consultas, la orientación y la formación fueron factores protectores frente al estrés. Además, algunos profesionales adoptaron tácticas para aliviar los factores estresantes resultantes de la pandemia. Conclusión: la vida diaria de la UPA cambió y el estrés laboral relacionado con la pandemia afecta a los profesionales de la salud. Las medidas de protección de la salud mental son necesarias para que puedan afrontar la grave crisis sanitaria, con el fin de prevenir el sufrimiento, mejorar la calidad de vida en el trabajo y mejores condiciones de trabajo y servicio para los usuarios.
ABSTRACT Objective: to analyze the daily work of health professionals in an Emergency Care Unit (ECU), with an emphasis on occupational stressors related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: qualitative case study, based on Michel de Certeau's theoretical-methodological framework about everyday life, carried out in a ECU size II in the countryside of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Data triangulation was performed, with observations, interviews with 31 professionals and document analysis. Data were organized in MAXQDA2020® and submitted to Bardin's content analysis. Results: the daily life in the ECU was changed by the pandemic and the institution underwent adaptations to attend to suspected or confirmed cases of COVID-19, with new operating strategies and redefinition of the assistance map. The occupational stressors identified were lack of clarity in the initial information about the disease, fear of contaminating themselves or family members, use of personal protective equipment (PPE), testing, removal and overload of professionals, risk of lack of medication and stigmatization of professionals of health. On the other hand, availability of PPE, drop in the number of visits, guidance and training were protective factors against stress. In addition, some professionals have adopted tactics to alleviate the stressors arising from the pandemic. Conclusion: the routine of the ECU has changed and the occupational stress related to the pandemic affects health professionals. Mental health protection measures are necessary so that they can face the serious health crisis, with a view to preventing suffering, better quality of life at work and better working conditions and service to users.
Assuntos
Humanos , Estresse Ocupacional , COVID-19 , Medidas de Segurança/normas , Centros de Saúde , Saúde Ocupacional , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Pandemias , Fatores de Proteção , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/provisão & distribuiçãoRESUMO
Blood-borne viruses, includingthe human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B virus, have certain common epidemiological characteristics and these viruses infect millions of people worldwide. This study aimed to determine the job satisfaction and the level of knowledge and practices regarding infectious diseases of employees working as hairdressers and barbers.This descriptive and cross-sectional study comprised 1200 hairdressers and barbers. The study sample comprised 628 people who consented to participate in the study. The mean age of the participants who participated in the study was 28, 13 ± 6. 9 years. The mean job satisfaction score of the participants was 3.85 ± 0.58. The job satisfaction score was found to be higher among those with sufficient knowledge of hepatitis B (p < 0.005). Employees should be provided performance trainings to achieve job satisfaction. It is recommended that employees be encouraged to wear gloves and gowns to protect their health and prevent contamination.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Barbearia/instrumentação , HIV , Conhecimento , Centros de Embelezamento e Estética , Hepatite B/epidemiologia , Hepatite B/virologia , Vírus da Hepatite B , Doenças Transmissíveis/transmissão , Doenças Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Saúde Ocupacional/etnologia , Síndrome da Imunodeficiência Adquirida/epidemiologia , Síndrome da Imunodeficiência Adquirida/virologia , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/provisão & distribuição , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/virologia , Satisfação no Emprego , Categorias de TrabalhadoresRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The increased susceptibility of cancer patients to coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) infections and complications calls for special precautions while treating cancer patients during COVID-19 pandemics. Thus, oncology departments have had to implement a wide array of prevention measures. OBJECTIVES: To address issues associated with cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic and to assess the implementation of measures aimed at containment of COVID-19 diffusion while allowing continuation of quality cancer care. METHODS: A national survey among oncology departments in Israel was conducted between 12 April 2020 and 14 April 2020. Eighteen heads of hospital-based oncology departments completed a self-report questionnaire regarding their institute's preparedness for treatment of cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: In this national survey, prevention measures against COVID-19 spread were taken prior to patients' arrival and at arrival or while staying in the departments. Most participants (78-89%) reported using a quick triage of patients and caregivers prior to their entrance to the oncology units, limiting the entrance of caregivers, and reducing unnecessary visits to the clinic. Switching to oral therapies rather than intravenous ones when possible was considered by 82% and shortage in personal protective equipment was reported by five (28%) heads of oncology departments. Some differences between large and small/medium sized medical centers were observed regarding issues related to COVID-19 containment measures and changes in treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Oncology departments in Israel were able to prepare and adapt their services to guidelines and requirements related to the COVID-19 pandemic with little harm to their treatment capacity.
Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/terapia , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/provisão & distribuição , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Israel , Triagem/métodosRESUMO
Endoscopists are at high risk of exposure and nosocomial transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 virus) when performing endoscopic procedures due to the highly aerosol generating nature of these procedures. At present, there is still no consensus among endoscopists with regards to the type of protective equipment to be worn by healthcare workers, when performing endoscopy during the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This review encompasses a summary of currently published guidelines related to the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) when performing endoscopic procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. With increasing calls to rationalize the use of PPE due to shortages in global supply chains, the review offers a concise summary on the most appropriate and adequate use of PPE when performing endoscopy during the pandemic. It is expected that these adaptations in the use of PPE during the pandemic will help to improve standards of care and safety of healthcare workers.
Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Paciente para o Profissional/prevenção & controle , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/provisão & distribuição , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/normas , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
The surgical theatre is associated with the highest mortality rates since the onslaught of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, Operating Department Practitioners (ODPs) are neglected human resources for health in regards to both professional development and research for patient safety; even though they are key practitioners with respect to infection control during surgeries. Therefore, this study aims to describe challenges faced by ODPs during the pandemic. The secondary aim is to use empirical evidence to inform the public health sector management about both ODP professional development and improvement in surgical procedures, with a specific focus on pandemics. A qualitative study has been conducted. Data collection was based on an interview guide with open-ended questions. Interviews with 39 ODPs in public sector teaching hospitals of Pakistan who have been working during the COVID-19 pandemic were part of the analysis. Content analysis was used to generate themes. Ten themes related to challenges faced by ODPs in delivering services during the pandemic for securing patient safety were identified: (i) Disparity in training for prevention of COVID-19; (ii) Shortcomings in COVID-19 testing; (iii) Supply shortages of personal protective equipment; (iv) Challenges in maintaining physical distance and prevention protocols; (v) Human resource shortages and role burden; (vi) Problems with hospital administration; (vii) Exclusion and hierarchy; (viii) Teamwork limitations and other communication issues; (ix) Error Management; and (x) Anxiety and fear. The public health sector, in Pakistan and other developing regions, needs to invest in the professional development of ODPs and improve resources and structures for surgical procedures, during pandemics and otherwise.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Pandemias , Cirurgiões/organização & administração , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/organização & administração , Adulto , Ansiedade/psicologia , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/psicologia , Teste para COVID-19 , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Paquistão/epidemiologia , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/ética , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/provisão & distribuição , Saúde Pública , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidade , Cirurgiões/psicologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Recursos Humanos/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
COVID-19 is a worldwide pandemic, with frontlines that look drastically different than in past conflicts: that is, women now make up a sizeable majority of the health care workforce. American women have a long history of helping in times of hardship, filling positions on the home front vacated by men who enlisted as soldiers during World War I and similarly serving in crucial roles on U.S. military bases, on farms, and in factories during World War II. The COVID-19 pandemic has represented a novel battleground, as the first in which women have taken center stage, not only in their roles as physicians, respiratory therapists, nurses, and the like, but also by serving in leadership positions and facilitating innovations in science, technology, and policy. Yet, the pandemic has exacerbated multiple pain points that have disproportionally impacted women in health care, including shortages in correctly sized personal protective equipment and uniforms, inadequate support for pregnant and breastfeeding providers, and challenges associated with work-life balance and obtaining childcare. While the pandemic has facilitated several positive advancements in addressing these challenges, there is still much work to be done for women to achieve equity and optimal support in their roles on the frontlines.
Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Mão de Obra em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Mulheres Trabalhadoras/história , Recursos Humanos/estatística & dados numéricos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/virologia , Empoderamento , Feminino , Equidade de Gênero , Pessoal de Saúde/tendências , História do Século XX , Humanos , Liderança , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/provisão & distribuição , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Mulheres Trabalhadoras/estatística & dados numéricos , I Guerra Mundial , II Guerra MundialRESUMO
BACKGROUND: As the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic accelerates, the supply of personal protective equipment remains under strain. To combat shortages, re-use of surgical masks and filtering facepiece respirators has been recommended. Prior decontamination is paramount to the re-use of these typically single-use only items and, without compromising their integrity, must guarantee inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 and other contaminating pathogens. AIM: We provide information on the effect of time-dependent passive decontamination (infectivity loss over time during room temperature storage in a breathable bag) and evaluate inactivation of a SARS-CoV-2 surrogate and a non-enveloped model virus as well as mask and respirator integrity following active multiple-cycle vaporised hydrogen peroxide (VHP), ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI), and dry heat (DH) decontamination. METHODS: Masks and respirators, inoculated with infectious porcine respiratory coronavirus or murine norovirus, were submitted to passive decontamination or single or multiple active decontamination cycles; viruses were recovered from sample materials and viral titres were measured via TCID50 assay. In parallel, filtration efficiency tests and breathability tests were performed according to EN standard 14683 and NIOSH regulations. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Infectious porcine respiratory coronavirus and murine norovirus remained detectable on masks and respirators up to five and seven days of passive decontamination. Single and multiple cycles of VHP-, UVGI-, and DH were shown to not adversely affect bacterial filtration efficiency of masks. Single- and multiple UVGI did not adversely affect respirator filtration efficiency, while VHP and DH induced a decrease in filtration efficiency after one or three decontamination cycles. Multiple cycles of VHP-, UVGI-, and DH slightly decreased airflow resistance of masks but did not adversely affect respirator breathability. VHP and UVGI efficiently inactivated both viruses after five, DH after three, decontamination cycles, permitting demonstration of a loss of infectivity by more than three orders of magnitude. This multi-disciplinal approach provides important information on how often a given PPE item may be safely reused.
Assuntos
COVID-19/metabolismo , Descontaminação/métodos , Peróxido de Hidrogênio/farmacologia , Norovirus/efeitos dos fármacos , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/provisão & distribuição , SARS-CoV-2/efeitos dos fármacos , Anti-Infecciosos/farmacologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/virologia , Reutilização de Equipamento , Temperatura Alta , Humanos , Máscaras/microbiologia , Norovirus/isolamento & purificação , Pandemias , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/microbiologia , Dispositivos de Proteção Respiratória/microbiologia , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Raios Ultravioleta , Terapia Ultravioleta , Ventiladores Mecânicos/microbiologia , VolatilizaçãoRESUMO
This short communication described the actions taken in ophthalmic practice in Kabul, Afghanistan during the COVID-19 pandemic to effectively protect both patients and staff. By following World Health Organisation (WHO), international and local guidelines it has been possible to continue treating ophthalmic outpatients with minimum risk to both patients and staff. The changes which have been implemented may allow better overall infection control in the hospital which will continue to have benefits post-pandemic.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Oftalmopatias/terapia , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Oftalmologia/métodos , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/provisão & distribuição , Afeganistão/epidemiologia , COVID-19/transmissão , COVID-19/virologia , Oftalmopatias/virologia , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/estatística & dados numéricos , Oftalmologia/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificaçãoRESUMO
As the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) spreads globally, hospital departments will need take steps to manage their treatment procedures and wards. The preparations of high-risk departments (infection, respiratory, emergency, and intensive care unit) were relatively well within this pandemic, while low-risk departments may be unprepared. The spine surgery department in The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University in Hefei, China, was used as an example in this study. The spine surgery department took measures to manage the patients, medical staff and wards to avoid the cross-infection within hospital. During the outbreak, no patients or healthcare workers were infected, and no treatment was delayed due to these measures. The prevention and control measures effectively reduced the risk of nosocomial transmission between health workers and patients while providing optimum care. It was a feasible management approach that was applicable to most low-risk and even high-risk departments.
Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Pandemias , Isolamento de Pacientes/organização & administração , Isoladores de Pacientes/provisão & distribuição , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidade , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/transmissão , China/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Desinfecção/métodos , Desinfecção/organização & administração , Pessoal de Saúde/educação , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Monitorização Fisiológica/instrumentação , Monitorização Fisiológica/métodos , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/instrumentação , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/métodos , Isolamento de Pacientes/métodos , Quartos de Pacientes/organização & administração , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/provisão & distribuição , Coluna Vertebral/cirurgiaRESUMO
The Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic had a huge impact on all sectors around the world. In particular, the healthcare system has been subject to an enormous pressure that has surpassed its ability in many instances. Additionally, the pandemic has called for a review of our daily medical practices, including our approach to colorectal cancer management where treatment puts patients at high risk of virus exposure. Given their higher median age, patients are at an increased risk for severe symptoms and complications in cases of infection, especially in the setting of immunosuppression. Therefore, a review of the routine colorectal cancer practices is needed to minimize risk of exposure. Oncologists should weigh risk of exposure versus the patient's oncologic benefits when approaching management. In addition, treatment protocols should be modified to minimize hospital visits and admissions while maintaining the same treatment efficacy. In this review, we will focus on challenges that colorectal cancer patients face during the pandemic, while highlighting the priority in each case. We will also discuss the evidence for potential modifications to existing treatment plans that could reduce infectious exposure without compromising care. Finally, we will discuss the impact of the socio-economic difficulties faced by Lebanese patients due to a poor economy toppled by an unexpected pandemic.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidade , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/transmissão , Gerenciamento Clínico , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Líbano/epidemiologia , Monitorização Fisiológica/métodos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias/patologia , Compostos Organoplatínicos/uso terapêutico , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/provisão & distribuição , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Telemedicina/métodosRESUMO
Introduction. An on-going coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a challenge all over the world. Since an endoscopy unit and its staff are at potentially high risk for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, we conducted a survey for the management of the gastrointestinal endoscopic practice, personal protective equipment (PPE), and risk assessment for COVID-19 during the pandemic at multiple facilities.Methods. The 11-item survey questionnaire was sent to representative respondent of Department of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Hospital, and its 19 related facilities.Results. A total of 18 facilities submitted valid responses and a total of 373 health care professionals (HCPs) participated. All facilities (18/18: 100%) were screening patients at risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection before endoscopy. During the pandemic, we found that the total volume of endoscopic procedures decreased by 44%. Eleven facilities (11/18: 61%) followed recommendations of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society (JGES); consequently, about 35%-50% of esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy were canceled. Mask (surgical mask or N95 mask), face shield/goggle, gloves (one or two sets), and gown (with long or short sleeves) were being used by endoscopists, nurses, endoscopy technicians, and endoscope cleaning staff in all the facilities (18/18: 100%). SARS-CoV-2 infection risk assessment of HCPs was conducted daily in all the facilities (18/18: 100%), resulting in no subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection in HCPs.Conclusion. COVID-19 has had a dramatic impact on the gastrointestinal endoscopic practice. The recommendations of the JGES were appropriate as preventive measures for the SARSCoV-2 infection in the endoscopy unit and its staff.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Controle de Infecções , Exposição Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Medição de Risco , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/transmissão , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/métodos , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/normas , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/instrumentação , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Paciente para o Profissional/prevenção & controle , Japão/epidemiologia , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/classificação , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/normas , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/provisão & distribuição , SARS-CoV-2 , Gestão da Segurança/tendênciasRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The present study was aimed to assess the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and associated factors among HCWs in endoscopy centers in Italy. METHODS: All members of the Italian Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SIED) were invited to participate to a questionnaire-based survey during the first months of the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy. RESULTS: 314/1306 (24%) SIED members accounting for 201/502 (40%) endoscopic centers completed the survey. Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) were available in most centers, but filtering face-piece masks (FFP2 or FFP3) and negative pressure room were not in 10.9 and 75.1%. Training courses on PPE use were provided in 57.2% of centers only; there was at least one positive HCW in 17.4% of centers globally, 107/3308 (3.2%) HCWs were diagnosed with COVID-19 with similar rates of physicians (2.9%), nurses (3.5%) and other health operators (3.5%). Involvement in a COVID-19 care team (OR: 4.96) and the lack of training courses for PPE, (OR: 2.65) were associated with increased risk. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of COVID-19 among endoscopy HCWs was not negligible and was associated with work in a COVID-19 care team and lack of education on proper PPE use. These data deserve attention during the subsequent waves.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Controle de Infecções , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Paciente para o Profissional/prevenção & controle , Exposição Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/transmissão , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/instrumentação , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Controle de Infecções/normas , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação das Necessidades , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/provisão & distribuição , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Desenvolvimento de Pessoal/provisão & distribuiçãoRESUMO
The article aims to discuss the care provided by female healthcare workers in Brazil during the Covid-19 pandemic, based on a sociological analysis by authors who discuss such care as devalued and poorly paid work performed to a large extent by low-income women. The work involves social constructions of emotions and has used the body as a work instrument in care for others. In addition, the increasingly precarious nature of health work in Brazilian society, aggravated in recent decades, with an increase in temporary contracts, loss of labor rights, overload of tasks, and adverse work conditions, among others, adds to the increase in medical and hospital care in the Covid-19 pandemic. In this context, female healthcare workers experience lack of personal protective equipment, fear of coronavirus infection, concerns with their children and other family members, and illness and death of coworkers and themselves. The article highlights the need for government attention and management of healthcare work and professional societies, analyzing the work conditions female healthcare workers are experiencing in confronting the pandemic.
Este texto tem como finalidade discutir o cuidado de trabalhadoras da área da saúde em face da Covid-19, sob a análise sociológica de autoras que o vêm discutindo enquanto um trabalho que é desempenhado, na sua maioria, pelas mulheres das classes populares, é desvalorizado e sofre baixa remuneração. É uma atividade que envolve as construções sociais das emoções e tem utilizado o corpo como um instrumento de trabalho no cuidado com o outro. Além disso, a precarização do trabalho em saúde na sociedade brasileira acirrada nas últimas décadas, como o aumento de contratos temporários, perdas de direitos trabalhistas, a sobrecarga das atividades, condições de trabalho precárias, dentre outros, soma-se com o aumento dos atendimentos médico-hospitalares diante da pandemia da Covid-19. Neste contexto, as trabalhadoras em saúde vivenciam as ausências de equipamentos de proteção individual, medo de contaminação pelo vírus, preocupações com filhos e familiares, vivências diante da morte e do adoecimento de si e de colegas de profissão. Este texto aponta para a necessidade de atenção governamental, bem como para a gestão do trabalho em saúde e dos órgãos de classe profissional, analisando as condições de trabalho que as trabalhadoras em saúde estão vivendo no enfrentamento da pandemia.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Atenção à Saúde , Pessoal de Saúde , Pandemias , Atitude Frente a Morte , Brasil/epidemiologia , COVID-19/psicologia , COVID-19/transmissão , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Atenção à Saúde/tendências , Família , Medo , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde/economia , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Humanos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/provisão & distribuição , Salários e Benefícios/tendências , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores Sociológicos , Local de Trabalho/psicologia , Local de Trabalho/normasRESUMO
Resumo Este texto tem como finalidade discutir o cuidado de trabalhadoras da área da saúde em face da Covid-19, sob a análise sociológica de autoras que o vêm discutindo enquanto um trabalho que é desempenhado, na sua maioria, pelas mulheres das classes populares, é desvalorizado e sofre baixa remuneração. É uma atividade que envolve as construções sociais das emoções e tem utilizado o corpo como um instrumento de trabalho no cuidado com o outro. Além disso, a precarização do trabalho em saúde na sociedade brasileira acirrada nas últimas décadas, como o aumento de contratos temporários, perdas de direitos trabalhistas, a sobrecarga das atividades, condições de trabalho precárias, dentre outros, soma-se com o aumento dos atendimentos médico-hospitalares diante da pandemia da Covid-19. Neste contexto, as trabalhadoras em saúde vivenciam as ausências de equipamentos de proteção individual, medo de contaminação pelo vírus, preocupações com filhos e familiares, vivências diante da morte e do adoecimento de si e de colegas de profissão. Este texto aponta para a necessidade de atenção governamental, bem como para a gestão do trabalho em saúde e dos órgãos de classe profissional, analisando as condições de trabalho que as trabalhadoras em saúde estão vivendo no enfrentamento da pandemia.
Abstract The article aims to discuss the care provided by female healthcare workers in Brazil during the Covid-19 pandemic, based on a sociological analysis by authors who discuss such care as devalued and poorly paid work performed to a large extent by low-income women. The work involves social constructions of emotions and has used the body as a work instrument in care for others. In addition, the increasingly precarious nature of health work in Brazilian society, aggravated in recent decades, with an increase in temporary contracts, loss of labor rights, overload of tasks, and adverse work conditions, among others, adds to the increase in medical and hospital care in the Covid-19 pandemic. In this context, female healthcare workers experience lack of personal protective equipment, fear of coronavirus infection, concerns with their children and other family members, and illness and death of coworkers and themselves. The article highlights the need for government attention and management of healthcare work and professional societies, analyzing the work conditions female healthcare workers are experiencing in confronting the pandemic.
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde/economia , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Atenção à Saúde/tendências , Pandemias , Salários e Benefícios/tendências , Brasil/epidemiologia , Atitude Frente a Morte , Família , Fatores Sexuais , Local de Trabalho/normas , Local de Trabalho/psicologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/psicologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/transmissão , Medo , Fatores Sociológicos , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/provisão & distribuição , Programas Nacionais de SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic presented a major medical management challenge to ophthalmology departments throughout Israel. OBJECTIVES: To examine the managerial challenges, actions taken, and insights of directors of ophthalmology departments in Israel during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a cross sectional survey of directors of ophthalmology departments during the COVID-19 pandemic while the Israeli population was quarantined. RESULTS: All 21 directors answered the survey. The majority of the COVID-19 admissions were located in the center of Israel (53%) and Jerusalem (30%). E-communication took a central role in coping with the pandemic with 80% of the directors satisfied with this form of communication; 75% reported a reduction in clinical and surgery volume of at least 25%, and 40% reported reallocations of manpower. Most of the medical staff used gloves, a face shield, disposable robe, and a mask with no uniformity across departments. Cross satisfaction was noted regarding a hospital's ability to equip the departments. Lack of preparation for post-pandemic era was reported by all directors, but one (95%). Directors sought guidelines and uniformity regarding outpatient referral to the hospital (p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines via safe digital platforms aid in management decisions and uniformity across departments. Advanced preparation is needed to prevent adverse clinical outcomes and to maintain treatment continuum. Our results can be used to guide and help improve the preparedness of ophthalmology departments during COVID-19 and for future pandemics.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Departamentos Hospitalares/organização & administração , Oftalmologia/organização & administração , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/estatística & dados numéricos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Adulto , Comunicação , Estudos Transversais , Equipamentos Descartáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Luvas Protetoras/estatística & dados numéricos , Departamentos Hospitalares/normas , Humanos , Israel , Máscaras/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/provisão & distribuição , Quarentena , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Radiographers and radiation therapists are key patient-facing health practitioners supporting the delivery of optimal patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this research was to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on clinical service delivery and well-being of these healthcare professionals in Australia. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey of Australian radiographers and radiation therapists was conducted in June-July 2020. The survey collected data on demographic characteristics, and the impact of COVID-19 on professional practice, infection control and workplace-related stress. RESULTS: A total of 218 responses were received. Changes in work hours (P < 0.001) and workload (P = 0.022) were experienced due to COVID-19. Diagnostic radiographers reported increased procedural pressure on mobile radiography, computed tomography and general radiography. For radiation therapists, most pressure included areas of simulation and linear accelerator. PPE was in short supply at the start of the pandemic, and at the time of the study, shortages were identified for all PPE items. There was no difference in PPE supply reported by diagnostic radiographers and radiation therapists except for hand sanitiser (P = 0.003). Respondents experienced increased personal stress (61.4%) and anxiety (58.2%) at work due to COVID-19. In addition, their work caused increased stress to their family, partners or friends (57.4%). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 has resulted in changes to clinical working patterns and service delivery. PPE shortages, as well as increased workplace-related stress, were identified. Workplaces should seek to mitigate the pandemic impact through the provision of adequate PPE for safe practice as well as implement strategies to support and enhance staff well-being.
Assuntos
COVID-19/psicologia , Radiologistas/psicologia , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Adulto , Austrália , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/provisão & distribuição , Admissão e Escalonamento de Pessoal , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
PURPOSE: We present the strategy of a comprehensive cancer center organized to make operations pandemic proof and achieve continuity of cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Disease Outbreak Response (DORS) measures implemented at our center and its satellite clinics included strict infection prevention, manpower preservation, prudent resource allocation, and adaptation of standard-of-care treatments. Critical day-to-day clinical operations, number of persons screened before entry, staff temperature monitoring, and personal protection equipment stockpile were reviewed as a dashboard at daily DORS taskforce huddles. Polymerase chain reaction swab tests performed for patients and staff who met defined criteria for testing of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection were tracked. Descriptive statistics of outpatient attendances and treatment caseloads from February 3 to May 23, 2020, were compared with the corresponding period in 2019. RESULTS: We performed COVID-19 swabs for 80 patients and 93 staff, detecting three cancer patients with community-acquired COVID-19 infections with no nosocomial transmission. Patients who required chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgery and patients who are on maintenance treatment continued to receive timely treatment without disruption. The number of intravenous chemotherapy treatments was maintained at 97.8% compared with 2019, whereas that of weekly radiotherapy treatments remained stable since December 2019. All cancer-related surgeries proceeded without delay, with a 0.3% increase in workload. Surveillance follow-ups were conducted via teleconsultation, accounting for a 30.7% decrease in total face-to-face clinic consultations. CONCLUSION: Through the coordinated efforts of a DORS taskforce, it is possible to avoid nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 transmissions among patients and staff without compromising on care delivery at a national cancer center.
Assuntos
Comitês Consultivos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Institutos de Câncer/organização & administração , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Assistência Ambulatorial/organização & administração , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/transmissão , Teste de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde , Pessoal de Saúde , Hospitalização , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/provisão & distribuição , SARS-CoV-2 , Singapura/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The institution-wide response of the University of California San Diego Health system to the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic was founded on rapid development of in-house testing capacity, optimization of personal protective equipment usage, expansion of intensive care unit capacity, development of analytic dashboards for monitoring of institutional status, and implementation of an operating room (OR) triage plan that postponed nonessential/elective procedures. We analyzed the impact of this triage plan on the only academic neurosurgery center in San Diego County, California, USA. METHODS: We conducted a de-identified retrospective review of all operative cases and procedures performed by the Department of Neurosurgery from November 24, 2019, through July 6, 2020, a 226-day period. Statistical analysis involved 2-sample z tests assessing daily case totals over the 113-day periods before and after implementation of the OR triage plan on March 16, 2020. RESULTS: The neurosurgical service performed 1429 surgical and interventional radiologic procedures over the study period. There was no statistically significant difference in mean number of daily total cases in the pre-versus post-OR triage plan periods (6.9 vs. 5.8 mean daily cases; 1-tail P = 0.050, 2-tail P = 0.101), a trend reflected by nearly every category of neurosurgical cases. CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the University of California San Diego Department of Neurosurgery maintained an operative volume that was only modestly diminished and continued to meet the essential neurosurgical needs of a large population. Lessons from our experience can guide other departments as they triage neurosurgical cases to meet community needs.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Hospitais Universitários/organização & administração , Neurocirurgia/organização & administração , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/organização & administração , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Teste de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , Teste Sorológico para COVID-19 , California/epidemiologia , Derivações do Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/estatística & dados numéricos , Número de Leitos em Hospital , Departamentos Hospitalares/organização & administração , Humanos , Controle de Infecções , Disseminação de Informação/métodos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Laboratórios Hospitalares , Sistemas Multi-Institucionais , Salas Cirúrgicas , Política Organizacional , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/provisão & distribuição , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , SARS-CoV-2 , Capacidade de Resposta ante Emergências , Triagem , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/estatística & dados numéricos , Ventiladores Mecânicos/provisão & distribuição , Ferimentos e Lesões/cirurgiaRESUMO
Background: COVID-19 is a terrific pandemic and a potential risk for every health care professional (HCP), especially during emergency conditions where the right timing is essential for the correct treatment. During surgery the correct setting of operative room (OR) is mandatory to reduce the risk of contamination. Personal protection equipment (PPE), specific devices, and planned OR setting are essential during surgery in pandemic COVID-19. Methods: Medline, PubMed, Scientific societies recommendations, and guidelines were consulted to identify articles reporting the setup of OR during pandemic COVID-19. Results: OR must have a high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter with negative pressure and a high air exchange cycle rate. Every supply kit should be packed and placed in the OR before patient arrival. A detailed checklist of equipment and devices is necessary. Personal PPE at the highest level should be provided to every HCP (Association of the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation [AAMI]-Level-III surgical gowns; double latex-free gloves with Acceptable Quality Level <1.0; FFP3 or powered air-purifying respirator masks with face shield). Anesthesia should be performed with a rapid sequence intubation. During surgery energy devices should be settled to the lower level in combination with a smoke evacuation switch pen with disposable smoke evacuation HEPA filter to minimize surgical smoke spread. During laparoscopy low pneumoperitoneum pressures and aspiration systems must be provided. Conclusions: Emergency surgery during pandemic COVID-19 increases the risk for every HCP in the OR. A theoretical risk of transmission from the surgical field exists. It is mandatory the adoption of strong strategies to reduce the risk of contamination in the OR.