Thyroid Collars in Dental Radiology: 2021 Update.

Background: In 2013, the American Thyroid Association (ATA) issued a "Policy Statement on Thyroid Shielding During Diagnostic Medical and Dental Radiology." The recently updated National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement Radiation Protection in Dentistry and Oral and Maxillofacial Imaging (NCRP Report No. 177) prompts this review of progress related to patient thyroid shielding since the ATA statement was published. Summary: Relevant publications appearing since the ATA statement were identified by querying PubMed for "thyroid and dental and (collar or shielding)" and substituting specific dental radiographic procedures in the search. The search was expanded by reviewing the cited papers in the PubMed-retrieved papers and by use of the Web of Science to retrieve papers citing the PubMed retrieved publications. Although many quantitative studies have appeared reflective of current dental radiographic instrumentation and practice, much more can be done to foster minimizing radiation to the thyroid. Conclusions: We list seven areas that should be pursued. Among them are harmonizing guidelines for the use of thyroid collars based on the recent studies and a comprehensive survey of current dental radiological practice patterns.

Usefulness of an additional lead shielding device in reducing occupational radiation exposure during interventional endoscopic procedures: An observational study.

Adoption of interventional endoscopic procedures is increasing with increasing prevalence of diseases. However, medical radiation exposure is concerning; therefore, radiation protection for medical staff is important. However, there is limited information on the usefulness of an additional lead shielding device during interventional endoscopic procedures. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether an additional lead shielding device protects medical staff from radiation.An X-ray unit (CUREVISTA; Hitachi Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) with an over-couch X-ray system was used. Fluoroscopy-associated scattered radiation was measured using a water phantom placed at the locations of the endoscopist, assistant, nurse, and clinical engineer. For each location, measurements were performed at the gonad and thyroid gland/eye levels. Comparisons were performed between with and without the additional lead shielding device and with and without a gap in the shielding device. Additionally, a clinical study was performed with 27 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures.The scattered radiation dose was lower with than without additional lead shielding at all medical staff locations and decreased by 84.7%, 82.8%, 78.2%, and 83.7%, respectively, at the gonad level and by 89.2%, 86.4%, 91.2%, and 87.0%, respectively, at the thyroid gland/eye level. Additionally, the scattered radiation dose was lower without than with a gap in the shielding device at all locations.An additional lead shielding device could protect medical staff from radiation during interventional endoscopic procedures. However, gaps in protective equipment reduce effectiveness and should be eliminated.

Guidance for otolaryngology health care workers performing aerosol generating medical procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus responsible for Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has a predilection for infecting the mucosa of the upper and lower airways. Otolaryngologists and supporting health care workers (HCWs) are particularly at high risk of becoming infected while treating patients as many in-office procedures and surgeries are Aerosol Generating Medical Procedures (AGMP). Based on a review of the literature and various guidelines, recommendations are made to mitigate the risk to health care workers of becoming infected with SARS-CoV-2 while providing clinical care. RECOMMENDATIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic all elective and non-time sensitive Otolaryngology procedures should be deferred to mitigate the risk of transmission of infection to HCWs. For non-AGMPs in all patients, even COVID-19 positive patients Level 1 PPE (surgical mask, gown, gloves and face shield or goggles) is sufficient. If local prevalence is favourable and patients are asymptomatic and test negative for SARS-CoV-2, Level 1 PPE can be used during short duration AGMPs, with limited risk of infected aerosol spread. For AGMPs in patients who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 a minimum of Level 2 PPE, with adequate protection of mucosal surfaces, is recommended (N95/FFP2 respirator, gown, double gloves, goggles or face shield and head cover). For long duration AGMPs that are deemed high-risk in COVID-19 positive patients, Level 3 PPE can provide a higher level of protection and be more comfortable during long duration surgeries if surgical hoods or PAPRs are used. It is recommended that these procedures are performed in negative pressure rooms, if available. It is essential to follow strict donning and doffing protocols to minimize the risk of contamination. CONCLUSIONS: By following strict infection prevention recommendations, the risk of HCWs becoming infected with SARS-CoV-2 while treating patients can be minimized. As the COVID-19 pandemic evolves rapidly, these recommendations should serve as guidance and need to be interpreted based on local factors and availability of healthcare resources.

Laparoscopic or robotic intraoperative management to minimize aerosol dispersion: Adaptations to the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. / Manejo intraoperatório em cirurgia laparoscópica ou robótica para minimizar a dispersão de aerossóis: Adaptações ao contexto da pandemia por COVID-19.

The coronavirus infection, also known as SARS-COV2, has proven to be potentially fatal, representing a major global health problem. Its spread after its origin in the city of Wuhan, China has resulted in a pandemic with the collapse of the health system in several countries, some with enormous social impact and expressive number of deaths as seen in Italy and Spain. Extreme intra and extra-hospital measures have been implemented to decrease the transmission and dissemination of the COVID-19. Regarding the surgical practice, a huge number of procedures considered non-essential or elective were cancelled and postponed until the pandemic is resolved. However, urgent and oncological procedures have been carried out. In this publication, we highlight and teach adaptations to be made with commonly used materials in laparoscopy to help prevent the spread and contamination of the healthcare team assisting surgical patients.

A infecção pelo coronavírus determinante da doença COVID-19, também conhecida como SARS-COV2 foi classificada nos últimos meses como pandemia. Essa é potencialmente fatal, representando enorme problema de saúde mundial. A disseminação, após provável origem zoonótica na cidade de Wuhan, China, resultou em colapso do sistema de saúde de diversos países, alguns com enorme impacto social e número grande de mortes descritas na Itália e Espanha. Medidas extremas intra e extra-hospitalares têm sido implementadas a fim de conter a transmissão e disseminação da COVID-19. No âmbito cirúrgico, enorme quantidade de procedimentos considerados não essenciais ou eletivos foram prorrogados ou suspensos até resolução da pandemia. No entanto, cirurgias de urgência e oncológicas não permitem que o paciente espere. Nesta publicação, sugerimos e ensinamos adaptação a ser feita com materiais de uso corriqueiro em laparoscopias para evitar a contaminação ou a disseminação entre as equipes assistenciais e os pacientes.

Use of a closed-system drug transfer device reduces contamination with doxorubicin during bolus injection.

BACKGROUND: Administration of doxorubicin via bolus injection may result in environmental contamination and a risk of nurses becoming exposed. Small spills are frequently observed by nurses when syringes are connected to, and disconnected from, infusion lines. AIMS: The effect of a closed-system drug transfer device (CSTD) on the release of doxorubicin was studied during administration via bolus injections. METHODS: 10 administrations with the currently used technique and 10 administrations using the CSTD were compared by analysis of doxorubicin contamination on gauze pads, tissues and gloves. FINDINGS: Using the current technique, contamination was found during nine administrations, which was mainly on the gauze pads and, to a lesser extent, on the tissues and gloves, indicating release of doxorubicin during administration. With use of the CSTD, contamination was found only on one pair of gloves. CONCLUSION: Use of a CSTD significantly decreased the number of spills and level of contamination compared with the currently used technique and, consequently, the use of such devices offers a safer working environment for nurses.

Evaluation of Different Quality-Relevant Aspects of Closed System Transfer Devices (CSTDs).

PURPOSE: Health care professionals can be exposed to hazardous drugs such as cytostatics during preparation of drugs for administration. Closed sytem transfer devices (CSTDs) were introduced to provide protection for healthcare professional against unintended exposure to hazardous drugs. The interest in CSTDs has significantly increased after USP <800> monograph was issued. The majority of the studies published so far on CSTDs have focused on their "containment" function. However, other important attributes for CSTDs with potential importance for product quality impact are not yet fully evaluated. METHODS: In the current study, we evaluated four sytems from different suppliers, in combination with different container closure systems (CCS), using solutions of different viscosity and surface tension. The different CSTD / CCS combinations were tested for (a) containment (integrity) using a highly sensitive helium leak test, (b) the force required for mounting the vial adaptor, (c) contribution to visible and subvisible particles as well as (d) the hold-up volume. RESULTS: Results show that the majority of CSTDs may have leaks varying in size, and that some of them generated visible particles due to stopper coring and subvisible particles, both due to silicon oil and particulate contaminations of the Devices. Finally, the holdup volume was up to 1 mL depending on the CSTD type, vial size and solution viscosity. CONCLUSION: These results show that there is a need to evaluate the compatibility of CSTD systems to select the best system for the intended use and that CSTDs may adversely impact product quality and delivered dose.

Challenges of Using Closed System Transfer Devices With Biological Drug Products: An Industry Perspective.

Hazardous drug is a common term used by the National Institute of Occupational Health and Safety (NIOSH) to classify medications that may induce adverse mutagenic and reproductive responses in health care personnel. NIOSH publishes a list of drugs it defines as hazardous where it may be appropriate for health care workers to take protective measures to reduce the potential for occupational exposure. Recent updates and proposed updates to this list have included large molecule biological products with oncology indications. Both NIOSH and USP <800> recommend the use of closed system transfer devices (CSTDs) during compounding. CSTDs are required for administration of prepared solution in NIOSH. However, USP has suggested that the principles of <800> are broadly applicable to hazardous drug handling activities across all facility types. USP encourages the widespread adoption and use of <800> across all health care settings, which many health care workers have interpreted beyond compounding to include administration and preparation of conventionally manufactured sterile products per approved labeling. Although the use of CSTDs may reduce exposure of health care personnel to chemotherapy agents in health care setting, the impact of CSTDs on quality of biologic drug products, including monoclonal antibodies and other proteins, is not fully understood. To complicate this issue further, there are several commercially available CSTDs in the market which have different fluid paths and material of construction that comes in contact with the drug. Testing every combination of CSTD and drug product for potential incompatibilities can be a labor intensive and impractical approach and cause delay in getting essential drugs to patients. A panel discussion was held at a recent American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists 2018 PharmSci 360 conference to discuss the impact of CSTDs on biologics. Impact on subvisible and visible particulates and impact to other product quality attributes such as high molecular weight species formation upon contact with CSTDs were reported in American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists meeting. Impact to deliverable dose, holdup volumes of various CSTDs, and stopper coring were also reported that has significant impact to patient safety. Given the fact that USP chapter <800> will be implemented in December 2019, feedback from health authorities regarding the use of CSTDs for biological drug products is needed to provide an appropriate risk/benefit balance to ensure patient safety and quality of the biologic drug product while also protecting the health care worker and the environment. The purpose of this commentary is to provide an industry perspective on the challenges during the use of CSTDs for biologic drug products and is intended to raise caution and awareness on the benefits and shortcomings of these devices.

Manejo intraoperatório em cirurgia laparoscópica ou robótica para minimizar a dispersão de aerossóis: Adaptações ao contexto da pandemia por COVID-19 / Laparoscopic or robotic intraoperative management to minimize aerosol dispersion: Adaptations to the context of the COVID-19 pandemic

RESUMO A infecção pelo coronavírus determinante da doença COVID-19, também conhecida como SARS-COV2 foi classificada nos últimos meses como pandemia. Essa é potencialmente fatal, representando enorme problema de saúde mundial. A disseminação, após provável origem zoonótica na cidade de Wuhan, China, resultou em colapso do sistema de saúde de diversos países, alguns com enorme impacto social e número grande de mortes descritas na Itália e Espanha. Medidas extremas intra e extra-hospitalares têm sido implementadas a fim de conter a transmissão e disseminação da COVID-19. No âmbito cirúrgico, enorme quantidade de procedimentos considerados não essenciais ou eletivos foram prorrogados ou suspensos até resolução da pandemia. No entanto, cirurgias de urgência e oncológicas não permitem que o paciente espere. Nesta publicação, sugerimos e ensinamos adaptação a ser feita com materiais de uso corriqueiro em laparoscopias para evitar a contaminação ou a disseminação entre as equipes assistenciais e os pacientes.

ABSTRACT The coronavirus infection, also known as SARS-COV2, has proven to be potentially fatal, representing a major global health problem. Its spread after its origin in the city of Wuhan, China has resulted in a pandemic with the collapse of the health system in several countries, some with enormous social impact and expressive number of deaths as seen in Italy and Spain. Extreme intra and extra-hospital measures have been implemented to decrease the transmission and dissemination of the COVID-19. Regarding the surgical practice, a huge number of procedures considered non-essential or elective were cancelled and postponed until the pandemic is resolved. However, urgent and oncological procedures have been carried out. In this publication, we highlight and teach adaptations to be made with commonly used materials in laparoscopy to help prevent the spread and contamination of the healthcare team assisting surgical patients.

COVID-19: Cuidados de Enfermagem em Unidade de Terapia Intensiva / COVID-19: Nursing Care in an Intensive Care Unit

A doença causada pelo novo coronavírus (COVID-19), foi identificada em dezembro de 2019, na China. Por ter uma disseminação extremamente rápida, de pessoa por pessoa, em janeiro de 2020 foi declarada uma urgência em saúde pública internacional e, em março, a COVID-19 foi declarada como uma pandemia. Os profissionais de saúde têm grande probabilidade de contrair ou transmitir essa doença, decorrente de sua alta exposição ao vírus. Com essa preocupação, o presente estudo fez uma revisão bibliográfica para descrever as rotinas e protocolos relacionados às melhores práticas para assistência de enfermagem aos pacientes com a COVID-19. No momento crítico como esse, cabe ao enfermeiro montar estratégias para qualificar a assistência e, ao mesmo tempo, promover a segurança dos profissionais que atuam diretamente no cuidado aos pacientes com a COVID-19.

The disease caused by the new coronavirus (COVID-19) was identified in December 2019, in China. By an extremely rapid dissemination of one person per person, in January 2020, COVID-19 was declared an international public health emergency, and, in March, it was declared as a pandemic. Health professionals are very likely to contract or transmit this disease, due to their high exposure to the virus. With this concern, the present study makes a bibliographic review to describe the routines and protocols related to the best nursing care practices for patients with a COVID-19. In the critical moment like this, the nurse is the responsible to develop strategies to qualify assistance and, at the same time, promote the safety of professionals who work directly in the patients care with a COVID-19.

OCCUPATIONAL DOSE AND RADIATION PROTECTION PRACTICE IN UAE: A RETROSPECTIVE CROSS-SECTIONAL COHORT STUDY (2002-2016).

A two-phased retrospective cross-sectional study analysed the occupational dose and radiation protection practice among medical workers in two hospitals in the UAE. Phase 1 evaluated radiation protection practice using a questionnaire, whereas phase 2 assessed the occupational dose. Readings of 952 thermoluminescence dosimeters were analyzed. The result showed 52% of medical workers have a good level of radiation protection practice. Readings of 952 thermoluminescence dosimeters were analyzedAverage annual effective dose per worker ranged from 0.39 to 0.83 mSv. Cardiologists and nurses displayed a higher average of occupational radiation dose compared to other workers. There were no significant correlations between radiation protection practice and hospital, occupation or department. Finally, the occupational dose was within the international and national limits, but the reduction of radiation dose to cardiologist and nurses is essential. Moreover, training is essential to promote radiation safe practice among medical workers.

RADIATION DOSES TO ANAESTHETISTS DURING PROSTATIC ARTERY EMBOLIZATION INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURES.

The objective of this study was to assess the radiation doses received by anaesthetists from prostatic artery embolization (PAE) procedures. Ten PAE procedures conducted in a reference hospital in the city of Recife, Brazil were investigated. Occupational dosimetry was performed using thermoluminescent dosemeters which were located next to the eyes, close to the thyroid (over the shielding), on the thorax (under the apron), on the wrist and on the feet of the physician's body. The results showed that the anaesthetist's feet received the highest doses followed by the eyes and the hands. In some complex PAE procedures the doses received by anaesthetists on the lens of the eyes and the effective dose were higher than those received by the main operator due to the anaesthetist's close position to the patient's table and the use of oblique projections. The personal dose equivalent Hp(3) per procedure for the anaesthetist's right eyebrow ranged from 20.2 µSv to 568.3 µSv. This result shows that anaesthetists assisting PAE procedures can exceeds the annual eye lens dose limit of 20 mSv recommended by the ICRP with only one procedure per week if radiation protection measures are not implemented during procedures.

Survey of guidelines and current practices for safe handling of antineoplastic and other hazardous drugs used in 24 countries.

PURPOSE: A survey of guidelines and current practices was conducted to examine the safe handling procedures for antineoplastic and other hazardous drugs that are used in 24 countries including the Americas, Europe, the Mideast, Far East, and Australia. METHODS: Subject experts were asked to complete a brief survey regarding safe handling guidelines and practices for hazardous drugs in their countries. Questions addressed practices for handling monoclonal antibodies, the use of closed-system transfer devices, medical surveillance practices, and measurements of compliance with existing guidelines. RESULTS: Responses from 37 subject experts representing 24 countries revealed considerable variation in the content and scope of safe handling guidelines and pharmacy practices among the participating countries. Guidelines in the majority of countries used the term "cytotoxics," while others referred to "hazardous" or "antineoplastic" drugs. The International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practice standard was cited by six countries, and five cited the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Alert. Others cited international guidelines other than International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, or they have created their own guidelines. Approximately half reported that their guidelines were mandatory under federal, state, or provincial legislation. Only 11 countries reported that monoclonal antibodies were covered in their guidelines. Closed-system drug-transfer devices are widely used, but were not specifically recommended in four countries, while one country required their use. Medical surveillance programs are in place in 20 countries, but only in The Netherlands is surveillance mandatory. Nine countries reported that they have completed recent updates or revisions of guidelines, and the measures for their adoption have been initiated. CONCLUSIONS: Although the overall goals in the participating countries were similar, the approaches taken to assure safe handling of hazardous drugs varied considerably in some cases.

Standard precautions questionnaire: adaptação cultural e validação semântica para profissionais de saúde no brasil / Standard precautions questionnaire: adaptación cultural y validación semántica para profesionales de salud de brasil / Standard precautions questionnaire: cultural adaptation and semantic validation for health professionals in brazil

RESUMO Objetivo: realizar a adaptação cultural e a validação semântica do Standard Precautions Questionnaire para profissionais de saúde brasileiros. Métodos: estudo desenvolvido entre 2017 e 2018 no Rio de Janeiro. A adaptação cultural incluiu a tradução, o consenso sobre a versão em português, a avaliação por especialistas, a retrotradução, o consenso e a comparação com a versão original, a avaliação semântica e a validação semântica. Todos os aspectos éticos foram respeitados. Resultados: na validação de conteúdo, as pontuações variaram de 0.60 a 1.00 e a pontuação foi igual a 0.96, indicando que os itens são muito representativos. Na avaliação semântica, 22 (80%) itens foram considerados relevantes e 24 (100%) itens foram considerados claros e compreensíveis por todos os profissionais. Conclusão: os itens da versão brasileira do instrumento foram representativos e relevantes para a prática clínica de profissionais de saúde na avaliação dos obstáculos para aderir a precauções padrão. Estudos são necessários para avaliar as propriedades psicométricas do instrumento.

RESUMEN: Objetivo: Efectuar la adaptación cultural y la validación semántica del Standard Precautions Questionnaire para profesionales de salud brasileños. Método: Estudio desarrollado entre 2017 y 2018, en Río de Janeiro. La adaptación cultural comprendió: traducción, consenso sobre la versión en portugués, evaluación de expertos, retrotraducción, consenso y comparación con la versión original, evaluación semántica y validación semántica. Se respetaron todos los aspectos éticos. Resultados: Para la validación de contenido, las puntuaciones oscilaron entre 0,60 y 1,00 y el puntaje fue de 0,96, indicando que los ítems son muy representativos. En la evaluación semántica, 22 (80%) ítems fueron considerados relevantes y 24 (100%) ítems fueron considerados claros y comprensibles por todos los profesionales. Conclusión: Los ítems de la versión brasileña del instrumento fueron representativos, relevantes en la práctica clínica del profesional de salud para evaluar los obstáculos de adhesión a las precauciones estándar. Serán necesarios estudios evaluando las propiedades psicométricas del instrumento.

ABSTRACT Objective: to accomplish the cultural adaptation and semantic validation of the Standard Precautions Questionnaire for Brazilian health professionals. Method: study developed between 2017 and 2018, in Rio de Janeiro. The cultural adaptation included translation, consensus on the Portuguese version, evaluation by experts, back-translation, consensus and comparison with the original version, semantic evaluation and semantic validation. All ethical aspects were respected. Results: for the content validation, the scores ranged from 0.60 to 1.00 and the score was 0.96, indicating that the items are very representative. In the semantic evaluation, 22 (80%) of the items were considered relevant and 24 (100%) of the items were considered clear and understandable by all professionals. Conclusion: the items of the Brazilian version of the instrument were representative, relevant for the clinical practice of health professionals in assessing the obstacles to adhere to standard precautions. Studies are needed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the instrument.

Needlesticks with safety devices and accident prevention: an integrative review / Agujas con dispositivos de seguridad y prevención de accidentes: revisión integrativa / Agulhas com dispositivos de segurança e a prevenção de acidentes: revisão integrativa

ABSTRACT Objective: To identify in the literature the efficacy of needlesticks with safety devices to reduce the occurrence of occupational accidents with exposure to biological material among health workers. Method: Integrative literature review, structured in the stages: Guiding question, search, categorization of studies, evaluation, discussion and interpretation of results, and synthesis of knowledge. Search for original articles and systematic reviews on the main bases of the Health area, published from 2000 to 2016 in Portuguese, English and Spanish, with descriptors: needlesticks injuries, exposure to biological agents, needles, protective devices, occupational accidents, accident prevention and health personnel. Results: We selected eleven articles, most characterized the passive safety devices as more effective in reducing the occurrence of injuries by needlesticks. Conclusion: The use of needlesticks with safety devices reduces the occurrence of accidents, bringing greater solvency when combined with the training of workers.

RESUMEN Objetivo: Identificar en la literatura la eficacia del uso de agujas con dispositivos de seguridad para reducir la ocurrencia de accidentes del trabajo con exposición a material biológico entre trabajadores de la salud. Método: Revisión integrativa de la literatura, estructurada en las etapas: Cuestión orientadora, búsqueda, categorización de los estudios, evaluación, discusión e interpretación de los resultados, y síntesis del conocimiento. Busca artículos originales y revisiones sistemáticas en las principales bases del área de la salud, publicados desde 2000 hasta 2016 en Portugués, Inglés y Español, con descriptores: lesiones por pinchazo de agujas, exposición a agentes biológicos, agujas, equipos de seguridad, accidentes de trabajo, prevención de accidentes y personal de salud. Resultados: Se han seleccionado once artículos, la mayoría caracterizó los dispositivos de seguridad pasivos como más efectivos en la disminución de la ocurrencia de lesiones por agujas. Conclusión: La utilización de agujas con dispositivos de seguridad reduce la ocurrencia de los accidentes, trayendo mayor resolutividad cuando aliada a la capacitación de los trabajadores.

RESUMO Objetivo: Identificar na literatura a eficácia do uso de agulhas com dispositivos de segurança para reduzir ocorrência de acidentes de trabalho com exposição a material biológico entre trabalhadores de saúde. Método: Revisão integrativa da literatura, estruturada nas etapas: Questão norteadora, busca, categorização dos estudos, avaliação, discussão e interpretação dos resultados, e síntese do conhecimento. Busca a artigos originais e revisões sistemáticas nas principais bases da área da Saúde, publicados de 2000 a 2016 em português, inglês e espanhol, com descritores: ferimentos penetrantes produzidos por agulhas, exposição a agentes biológicos, agulhas, equipamentos de proteção, acidentes de trabalho, prevenção de acidentes e pessoal de saúde. Resultados: Foram selecionados onze artigos, a maioria caracterizou os dispositivos de segurança passivos como mais efetivos na diminuição da ocorrência de lesões por agulhas. Conclusão: A utilização de agulhas com dispositivos de segurança reduz a ocorrência dos acidentes, trazendo maior resolutividade quando aliada à capacitação dos trabalhadores.

Fatores relacionados ao uso de equipamentos de proteção individual em agentes comunitários de saúde de um município do litoral norte de São Paulo / Factors associated with use of personal proactive equipment among community health agents in a coastal municipality in northern São Paulo, Brazil

Introdução: O agente comunitário de saúde (ACS) integra uma equipe multiprofissional na Estratégia Saúde da Família (ESF) e tem por função o desenvolvimento de ações individuais e coletivas de promoção, prevenção e recuperação da saúde, incluindo visitas domiciliares. O trabalho do ACS o expõe a riscos presentes no ambiente laboral; nesse contexto, o uso de equipamentos de proteção individual (EPI) é fundamental. Objetivos: Identificar o perfil sociodemográfico e de trabalho de ACS e verificar associações com a utilização de EPI. Métodos: Estudo transversal, quantitativo, realizado com 137 ACS de um município do litoral norte de São Paulo, Brasil, por meio de um questionário contendo dados sociodemográficos e relacionados ao trabalho. A análise foi realizada estabelecendo-se as análises descritivas e inferenciais, considerando estatisticamente significativos os resultados com p=0,05. Resultados: 94,16% dos ACS são mulheres, com idade média de 34,80 anos. O tempo médio de atuação profissional foi de 3,18 anos; o tipo de transporte mais utilizado entre a UBS e a residência e para exercer o trabalho na microárea foi a bicicleta; 94,16% dos ACS referiu utilizar algum tipo de EPI diariamente. Os tipos de EPI relatados foram: protetor solar (88,32%), sapato fechado (53,28%), boné (8,03%), óculos de sol (6,57%) e capa de chuva (3,65%). Verificou-se associação significativa entre utilização de EPI e maior tempo de profissão, entre uso de sapato fechado e maior idade e maior tempo de profissão. Conclusão: Os resultados evidenciam necessidade de intervenções para favorecer o uso desses equipamentos

Background: Community health agents (CHAs) are a part of Family Health Strategy multidisciplinary teams, and their function is to develop individual and collective health promotion, recovery and preventive actions, including household visits. Their work exposes CHAs to hazards in the work environment, therefore, using personal protective equipment (PPE) is essential. Aims: To draw the sociodemographic and occupational profile of CHAs and investigate associations with use of PPE. Methods: Cross-sectional quantitative study performed with 137 CHAs in a coastal municipality in the north of the state of São Paulo, Brazil. We applied a questionnaire for sociodemographic and occupational data. The data were subjected to descriptive and inferential analysis, with significance level of 5%. Results: 94.16% of the participants were female, and their average age 34.80 years old. Their average time in the job was 3.18 years. The means of transport most often used to commute was bicycles. 94.16% of the participants reported daily use of some type of PPE, which included: sunscreen (88.32%), closed footwear (53.28%), hats (8.0%), sunglasses (6.57%) and raincoats (3.65%). We found significant association between use of PPE and longer time in the job, and between wearing closed footwear and older age and longer time in the job. Conclusion: The results point to the need of interventions to promote use of PPE

Influence of stent design and use of protection devices on outcome of carotid artery stenting: a pooled analysis of individual patient data.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Carotid artery stenting is an alternative to endarterectomy for the treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis but was associated with a higher risk of procedural stroke or death in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Technical aspects of treatment may partly explain these results. The purpose of this analysis was to investigate the influence of technical aspects such as stent design or the use of protection devices, as well as clinical variables, on procedural risk. METHODS: We pooled data of 1557 individual patients receiving stent treatment in three large RCTs comparing stenting versus endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. The primary outcome event was any procedural stroke or death occurring within 30 days after stenting. RESULTS: Procedural stroke or death occurred significantly more often with the use of open-cell stents (61/595 patients, 10.3%) than with closed-cell stents (58/962 patients, 6.0%; RR 1.76; 95% CI 1.23 to 2.52; P=0.002). Procedural stroke or death occurred in 76/950 patients (8.0%) treated with protection devices (predominantly distal filters) and in 43/607 (7.1%) treated without protection devices (RR 1.10; 95% CI 0.71 to 1.70; P=0.67). Clinical variables predicting the primary outcome event were age, severity of the qualifying event, history of prior stroke, and level of disability at baseline. The effect of stent design remained similar after adjustment for these variables. CONCLUSIONS: In symptomatic carotid stenosis, the use of stents with a closed-cell design is independently associated with a lower risk of procedural stroke or death compared with open-cell stents. Filter-type protection devices do not appear to reduce procedural risk.

An evaluation of chemotherapy drug preparation process in hospitals in Turkey - A pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the practice differences among chemotherapy units and the opinions of pharmacists on safety precautions for handling antineoplastic drugs in hospitals. METHOD: The survey was administered to hospital pharmacists in Turkey. The pharmacists who work in chemotherapeutic drug preparation units were asked to participate if they are volunteered. The participating pharmacists were asked questions about the type of chemotherapy units, order and verification process of chemotherapy protocols and potential shortcomings of chemotherapy preparation. The questions were initially assessed in a small sample of pharmacists and subsequently revised and refined. The filled and returned questionnaires were accepted as given consent. RESULTS: A total of 97 questionnaires were delivered and 40 (41%) were returned by pharmacists. The median age and practicing years in hospitals of the pharmacists were 38.0 and 6.25 years, respectively. Fully automated chemotherapy units were used by 42.5% of respondents, whereas 30% prepare chemotherapeutics manually; furthermore, 87.5% provide chemotherapeutic drug preparations (admixtures) less than 120 per day. With regard to the drug preparation process, more than half of the respondents 'always' use protective equipment without foot covers (32.3%). Almost 90% of respondents 'always' use a coat, mask and biological safety cabinets; however, 20% of respondents 'often' use closed-system drug transfer sets. More than 50% of pharmacists expressed that they have sufficient knowledge on cytotoxics and the risk of exposure, protective precautions, selection and usage of personal protective equipment and correct storage of cytotoxics. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists acknowledge sufficient understanding of safe preparation and handling of chemotherapeutics, but reported practices by pharmacists in hospitals are not consistent with published recommendations. Providing theoretical and practical educations for pharmacists and developing standard procedures for preparing chemotherapy may be beneficial in improving the preparation and use of antineoplastics in Turkey.

Novel Sternal Protection Device for Cardiac Surgery Via Median Sternotomy Incision.

OBJECTIVE: Sternal bleeding during cardiac surgery is currently controlled using bone wax or other chemical substances that may result in adverse effects and affect wound healing and recovery. The purpose of this study was to identify a safe, cost-effective, and easy-to-use technique to reduce sternal bleeding and sternal trauma during cardiac surgery. METHODS: After sternotomy, a sternal protection device was placed over each hemisternal section before insertion of the retractor and remained in situ until the end of surgery. Sternal bleeding and ease of use were assessed and recorded during surgery. Sternal trauma was assessed and recorded within 5 minutes of removal of the device, and overall satisfaction (Global Impression) and any intraoperative adverse events or device malfunction were reported at surgery completion. Patients were followed up 24 hours and 4 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: Twelve patients completed the study. Adverse events reported were not considered related to the device. No sternal trauma was identified in any patient. In 9 of 11 patients, sternal bleeding was reduced after insertion of the device. The device was generally considered easy to use, although some difficulty was encountered when used with the Internal Mammary Artery retractor. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the device is safe and able to reduce sternal bleeding during surgery using sternal retractors. We recommend further studies in a larger population of patients with a control group to evaluate the device's ability to reduce the morbidity associated with sternal bleeding and sternal trauma.