Spinal cord size as promising biomarker of disability outcomes after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Biomarkers predictive of disability outcomes in individual multiple sclerosis (MS) patients undergoing autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) are currently lacking. As correlations between spinal cord atrophy and clinical disability in MS were previously described, in this study spinal cord size was investigated in MS patients treated with AHSCT, exploring whether baseline spinal cord volume may predict disability progression after AHSCT. METHODS: relapsing-remitting (RR-) and secondary-progressive (SP-) MS patients treated with AHSCT (BEAM/ATG regimen) at a single academic centre in Florence, who performed at least two standardized brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs) scans (acquired between one-year pre-AHSCT to 5 years after AHSCT) were included. Cervical spinal cord atrophy was estimated as upper cervical spinal cord cross-sectional area (SCCSA). Brain volume loss (BVL) was analysed at the same timepoints. RESULTS: Eleven (8 RR-; 3 SP-) MS patients were included. Over a median follow-up of 66 (range 37 - 100) months, no relapses nor brain MRI activity were observed; disability progressed in 2 cases (both SP-MS). Baseline SCCSA was associated with EDSS change between pre- and one-year post-AHSCT. Compared to patients who stabilized, patients who progressed after AHSCT tended to have lower SCCSA at C4 level at baseline and year 1 after AHSCT. Longitudinal changes in SCCSA or BVL did not correlate with EDSS change. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline pre-AHSCT SCCSA, but not its longitudinal changes nor BVL, predicted EDSS change within the two years following AHSCT. SCCSA may represent a biomarker of treatment response and a promising screening tool for assessing patient eligibility for high-impact treatments such as AHSCT.

Efficacy of intrathecal mesenchymal stem cell-neural progenitor therapy in progressive MS: results from a phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal stem cell-neural progenitors (MSC-NPs) are a bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-derived ex vivo manipulated cell product with therapeutic potential in multiple sclerosis (MS). The objective of this study was to determine efficacy of intrathecal (IT) MSC-NP treatment in patients with progressive MS. METHODS: The study is a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial with a compassionate crossover design conducted at a single site. Subjects were stratified according to baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) (3.0-6.5) and disease subtype (secondary or primary progressive MS) and randomized into either treatment or placebo group to receive six IT injections of autologous MSC-NPs or saline every two months. The primary outcome was EDSS Plus, defined by improvement in EDSS, timed 25-foot walk (T25FW) or nine-hole peg test. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of EDSS Plus, the six-minute walk test (6MWT), urodynamics testing, and brain atrophy measurement. RESULTS: Subjects were randomized into MSC-NP (n = 27) or saline (n = 27) groups. There was no difference in EDSS Plus improvement between the MSC-NP (33%) and saline (37%) groups. Exploratory subgroup analysis demonstrated that in subjects who require assistance for ambulation (EDSS 6.0-6.5) there was a significantly higher percentage of improvement in T25FW and 6MWT in the MSC-NP group (3.7% ± 23.1% and - 9.2% ± 18.2%) compared to the saline group (-54.4% ± 70.5% and - 32.1% ± 30.0%), (p = 0.030 and p = 0.036, respectively). IT-MSC-NP treatment was also associated with improved bladder function and reduced rate of grey matter atrophy on brain MRI. Biomarker analysis demonstrated increased MMP9 and decreased CCL2 levels in the cerebrospinal fluid following treatment. CONCLUSION: Results from exploratory outcomes suggest that IT-MSC-NP treatment may be associated with a therapeutic response in a subgroup of MS patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03355365, registered November 14, 2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03355365?term=NCT03355365&rank=1 .

Effectiveness of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation versus natalizumab in progressive multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Natalizumab was not shown to modify disability in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). This matched observational study compared the effectiveness of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) with natalizumab in progressive MS. METHODS: Patients with primary/secondary progressive MS from seven AHSCT MS centres and the MSBase registry, treated with AHSCT or natalizumab, were matched on a propensity score derived from sex, age, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), number of relapses 12/24 months before baseline, time from MS onset, the most effective prior therapy and country. The pairwise-censored groups were compared on hazards of 6-month confirmed EDSS worsening and improvement, relapses and annualised relapse rates (ARRs), using Andersen-Gill proportional hazards models and conditional negative binomial model. RESULTS: 39 patients treated with AHSCT (37 with secondary progressive MS, mean age 37 years, EDSS 5.7, 28% with recent disability progression, ARR 0.54 during the preceding year) were matched with 65 patients treated with natalizumab. The study found no evidence for difference in hazards of confirmed EDSS worsening (HR 1.49, 95% CI 0.70 to 3.14) and improvement (HR 1.50, 95% CI 0.22 to 10.29) between AHSCT and natalizumab over up to 4 years. The relapse activity was also similar while treated with AHSCT and natalizumab (ARR: mean±SD 0.08±0.28 vs 0.08±0.25; HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.39 to 2.82). In the AHSCT group, 3 patients experienced febrile neutropenia during mobilisation, 9 patients experienced serum sickness, 6 patients required intensive care unit admission and 36 patients experienced complications after discharge. No treatment-related deaths were reported. CONCLUSION: This study does not support the use of AHSCT to control disability in progressive MS with advanced disability and low relapse activity.

Repair what is lost: Neuroprotection through neural stem cells in progressive MS.

Genchi et al.1 report the first phase 1 trial of neural stem cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis showing a reduction in gray matter atrophy. Results give hope for a new era of induced neuroprotection, especially in progressive multiple sclerosis.

Evaluation of neurotrophic factor secreting mesenchymal stem cells in progressive multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Autologous mesenchymal stem cell neurotrophic factor-secreting cells (NurOwn®) have the potential to modify underlying disease mechanisms in progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS). OBJECTIVE: This open-label phase II study was conducted to evaluate safety/efficacy of three intrathecal cell treatments. METHODS: Eighteen participants with non-relapsing PMS were treated. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included: cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers; timed 25-foot walk speed, nine-hole peg test (9-HPT), low-contrast letter acuity, symbol digit modalities test, and 12-item multiple sclerosis (MS) walking scale. Seventeen participants received all treatments. RESULTS: No deaths/adverse events related to worsening of MS, clinical/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence of disease activation, and clinically significant changes in safety lab results were reported. Two participants developed symptoms of low back and leg pain, consistent with a diagnosis of arachnoiditis, occurring in one of three intrathecal treatments in both participants. Nineteen percent of treated participants achieved pre-specified ⩾ 25% improvements in timed 25-foot walk speed/nine-HPT at 28 weeks compared to baseline, along with consistent efficacy signals for pre-specified response criteria across other secondary efficacy outcomes. CSF neuroprotective factors increased, and inflammatory biomarkers decreased after treatment, consistent with the proposed mechanism of action. CONCLUSION: Based on these encouraging preliminary findings, further confirmation in a randomized study is warranted.

Multiple transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells in a patient with active progressive multiple sclerosis: Long term therapeutic outcomes.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is one of the most common idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating disease. One of the challenges in the treatment of MS is how to overcome relapses without severe adverse effects. Due to their immunoregulatory properties and safety, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), present a potential alternative for treatment for MS. The efficacy and safety of a long-term MSCs therapy in MS remain to be established. In this communication, we report the clinical condition and disease progression of an MS patient treated for 11 years, with multiple infusions of MSCs derived from either his bone marrow (BM), pooled human umbilical cords (UC), or from his own child umbilical cord. A male patient diagnosed as progressive MS (EDSS score 3) was enrolled into our study and received 1 × 106 cells/kg of MSCs, at least once a year for 9 years. The MSCs treatment was well tolerated with no significant side effects. Following the transplantation of MSCs, the overall EDSS scores of the patient decreased over the 10 years period of observation. MRI investigation did not reveal any new lesions. However, upon the cessation of the MSCs treatment, the EDSS score increased from 1.0 to 3.5, further supporting the notion that in such a patient, the transplantation of MSCs, had a significant beneficial effect. This case study is the first to report on the beneficial effects of multiple infusions of BM-MSC and umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) in a progressive MS patient, over a period of 11 years, in absence of any other treatments. Hence, multiple infusions of MSCs may provide a novel therapeutic avenue for patients with aggressive MS.

Effects of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation on Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Neurofilament light chains (NF-L) were shown to serve as a reliable biomarker of neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis (MS). The chemokine receptor CXCL13 was shown to correlate with CNS inflammatory activity and to predict the future progression of MS. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the levels of NF-L and CXCL13 in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) following treatment with mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) in patients with progressive MS. METHODS: The CSF samples were obtained from 48 patients with progressive MS who participated in a double-blind randomized phase II clinical trial that tested the effects of intrathecal (IT) or intravenous (IV) transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), at baseline (before the first injection of the MSC) and at 6 months following treatment with MSC, or sham treatment. The CSF specimens were tested in a blinded way, using a single-molecule array (SIMOA) technique. FINDINGS: The CSF levels of NF-L were significantly lower at 6 months following treatment with MSC-IT when compared with the baseline, pre-treatment measurements (P = .026, Wilcoxon paired test). Nine out of 15 tested patients in the MSC-IT group had a reduction in NF-L levels of more than 50% (median decrease: -4449 pg/mL) when compared with 5/15 in the MSC-IV group (median decrease: -151 pg/mL) and 1/15 in the placebo group (median increase: +2450 pg/mL) (P = .001 for MSC-IT vs. placebo, chi-square test). CXCL13 levels were also reduced at 6 months following MSC-IT treatment but not to a statistically significant level. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate possible neuroprotective effects of MSC transplantation in patients with MS. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02166021.

Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Active Multiple Sclerosis: A Real-world Case Series.

OBJECTIVE: To examine outcomes in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) treated with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) in a real-world setting. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of PwMS treated with AHSCT at 2 centers in London, UK, consecutively between 2012 and 2019 who had ≥6 months of follow-up or died at any time. Primary outcomes were survival free of multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses, MRI new lesions, and worsening of Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score. Adverse events rates were also examined. RESULTS: The cohort includes 120 PwMS; 52% had progressive MS (primary or secondary) and 48% had relapsing-remitting MS. At baseline, the median EDSS score was 6.0; 90% of the evaluable cases showed MRI activity in the 12 months preceding AHSCT. Median follow-up after AHSCT was 21 months (range 6-85 months). MS relapse-free survival was 93% at 2 years and 87% at 4 years after AHSCT. No new MRI lesions were detected in 90% of participants at 2 years and in 85% at 4 years. EDSS score progression-free survival (PFS) was 75% at 2 years and 65% at 4 years. Epstein-Barr virus reactivation and monoclonal paraproteinemia were associated with worse PFS. There were 3 transplantation-related deaths within 100 days (2.5%), all after fluid overload and cardiac or respiratory failure. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy outcomes of AHSCT in this real-world cohort are similar to those reported in more stringently selected clinical trial populations, although the risks may be higher. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study is rated Class IV because of the uncontrolled, open-label design.

Impact of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation on disability and brain atrophy in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) is a valuable option in aggressive relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), but its efficacy in secondary progressive (SP)-MS is still controversial. OBJECTIVE: Assessing efficacy of aHSCT in SP-MS by clinical-radiological outcomes. METHODS: Open-label monocentric retrospective study enrolling consecutive SP-MS patients treated with BEAM-aHSCT in the period 1999-2016. RESULTS: In total, 26 SP-MS patients with moderate-severe disability were included. Progression-free survival (PFS) at years 5 and 10 after aHSCT were, respectively, 42% and 30%. Out of 16 patients who worsened, only 6 patients (23% overall) maintained continuous disability accrual (CDA), whereas 10 patients stabilized following one single-step Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) worsening. CDA-free survival was 74% at 5-10 years. No relapses or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity were reported, thus no evidence of disease activity (NEDA)-3 corresponded to PFS. Annualized rate of brain atrophy (AR-BVL) normalized after 1 year in 55% of the cases analysed (12/22). CONCLUSION: BEAM-aHSCT halted CDA and normalized AR-BVL in most of the treated patients, inducing long-term remission of inflammatory activity at a median follow-up of 99 months (range 27-222). These data suggest that CDA might still be mainly driven by inflammation in a subgroup of SP-MS and could therefore be reversed by treatments. CDA should be analysed independently from any isolated disability worsening.

Mesenchymal stem cell-derived neural progenitors in progressive MS: Two-year follow-up of a phase I study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term safety and efficacy of repeated intrathecal (IT) administration of autologous mesenchymal stem cell-derived neural progenitors (MSC-NPs) in patients with progressive MS by evaluating subjects 2 years after treatment. METHODS: Twenty subjects were enrolled as part of a phase I, open-label single-arm study of 3 IT injections of MSC-NPs spaced 3 months apart. Subjects were evaluated for adverse events and disability outcomes including the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and the timed 25-foot walk (T25FW). Long-term evaluation was conducted 2 years after the third treatment. CSF was collected before and 3 months after treatment. RESULTS: Eighteen of the 20 study participants completed the full 2-year follow-up protocol. There were no long-term adverse events associated with repeated IT-MSC-NP treatment. Seven subjects showed sustained improvement in EDSS after 2 years, although the degree of improvement was not maintained in 5 of the subjects. Three of the 10 ambulatory subjects showed sustained improvement in the T25FW after 2 years. CSF biomarker analysis revealed a decrease in C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) and an increase in interleukin 8, hepatocyte growth factor, and C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12) after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Safety and efficacy of repeated IT-MSC-NP treatment was sustained for 2 years; however, the degree of disability reversal was not sustained in a subset of patients. CSF biomarkers altered in response to IT-MSC-NP treatment may reflect specific immunoregulatory and trophic mechanisms of therapeutic response in MS. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with progressive MS, IT administration of MSC-NPs is safe and effective. The study is rated Class IV because of the absence of a non-IT-MSC-NP-treated control group. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01933802.

Beneficial effects of autologous mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in active progressive multiple sclerosis.

In this study (trial registration: NCT02166021), we aimed to evaluate the optimal way of administration, the safety and the clinical efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transplantation in patients with active and progressive multiple sclerosis. Forty-eight patients (28 males and 20 females) with progressive multiple sclerosis (Expanded Disability Status Scale: 3.0-6.5, mean : 5.6 ± 0.8, mean age: 47.5 ± 12.3) and evidence of either clinical worsening or activity during the previous year, were enrolled (between 2015 and 2018). Patients were randomized into three groups and treated intrathecally (IT) or intravenously (IV) with autologous MSCs (1 × 106/kg) or sham injections. After 6 months, half of the patients from the MSC-IT and MSC-IV groups were retreated with MSCs, and the other half with sham injections. Patients initially assigned to sham treatment were divided into two subgroups and treated with either MSC-IT or MSC-IV. The study duration was 14 months. No serious treatment-related safety issues were detected. Significantly fewer patients experienced treatment failure in the MSC-IT and MSC-IV groups compared with those in the sham-treated group (6.7%, 9.7%, and 41.9%, respectively, P = 0.0003 and P = 0.0008). During the 1-year follow-up, 58.6% and 40.6% of patients treated with MSC-IT and MSC-IV, respectively, exhibited no evidence of disease activity compared with 9.7% in the sham-treated group (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0048, respectively). MSC-IT transplantation induced additional benefits on the relapse rate, on the monthly changes of the T2 lesion load on MRI, and on the timed 25-foot walking test, 9-hole peg test, optical coherence tomography, functional MRI and cognitive tests. Treatment with MSCs was well-tolerated in progressive multiple sclerosis and induced short-term beneficial effects regarding the primary end points, especially in the patients with active disease. The intrathecal administration was more efficacious than the intravenous in several parameters of the disease. A phase III trial is warranted to confirm these findings.

Promises and Limitations of Neural Stem Cell Therapies for Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.

Multiple disease-modifying medications with regulatory approval to treat multiple sclerosis (MS) are unable to prevent inflammatory tissue damage in the central nervous system (CNS), and none directly promote repair. Thus, there is an unmet clinical need for therapies that can arrest and reverse the persistent accumulation of disabilities associated with progressive forms of MS (P-MS). Preclinical research has revealed an unexpected ability of neural stem cell (NSC) therapies to provide neurotrophic support and inhibit detrimental host immune responses in vivo following transplantation into the chronically inflamed CNS. We discuss NSC transplantation as a promising therapy for P-MS, elaborate on the necessities of clinical trial validation and formalized usage guidelines, and caution about unscrupulous 'clinics' marketing unproven therapies to patients.

Autologous stem cell transplant in adult multiple sclerosis patients: A study from North India.

INTRODUCTION: Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) provides long periods of progression-free-survival in multiple sclerosis (MS). This is an observational study to demonstrate the safety of ASCT in MS patients at a transplant center in North India using a lymphoablative regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MS patients > 18 years referred by a neurologist or who came of their own volition were evaluated. Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score was calculated and those with a score of >7 were excluded. Informed written consent was taken. Mobilization was done with G-CSF with prednisolone to prevent disease flare-up. A minimum of 2 × 106 CD34 cells/kg was collected. Conditioning regimen consisted of rabbit ATG and cyclophosphamide. Rituximab 375 mg/m2 was given to prevent EBV reactivation and disease relapse. Antibiotic prophylaxis was given with levofloxacin, fluconazole, and valacyclovir. Any persistent change in EDSS scores ≥0.5 was considered significant. RESULTS: Twenty patients were included. Seven patients had positive urine cultures prior to transplant and were treated before starting any chemotherapy. Majority patients were women (13/20). All patients developed febrile neutropenia, which was managed as per department policy. There was no mortality. Subjective symptoms improved in all patients. EDSS score improved in 6/19 patients (5/6 with RRMS) with no disease progression in any patient at a median follow-up duration of 242 days. CONCLUSION: ASCT can be done safely for patients with relatively high EDSS scores with additional precautions for screening for infections. RRMS patients with the active disease show most improvement. SPMS patients may not show significant improvement in the short term.

Percutaneous Venous Angioplasty in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency: A Randomized Wait List Control Study.

BACKGROUND: Venous percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (vPTA) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) have shown contradictory results. The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of the procedure in a randomized wait list control study. METHODS: 66 adults with neurologist-confirmed diagnosis of MS and sonographic diagnosis of CCSVI were allocated into vPTA-yes group (n = 31) or vPTA-not group (n = 35, control group). vPTA was performed immediately 15 days after randomization in the PTA-yes group and 6 months later in the control group. Evoked potentials (EPs), clinical-functional measures (CFMs), and upper limb kinematic measures (ULKMs) were measured at baseline (T0) and six months after in both groups, just before the venous angioplasty in the vPTA-not group (T1). RESULTS: Comparing the vPTA-yes and vPTA-not group, the CFM-derived composite functional outcome showed 11 (37%) versus 7 (20%) improved, 1 (3%) versus 3 (8%) stable, 0 versus 7 (20%) worsened, and 19 (61%) versus 18 (51%) mixed patients (χ2 = 8.71, df = 3, P = 0.03). Unadjusted and adjusted (for baseline confounding variables) odds ratio at 95% confidence interval were, respectively, 1.93 (1.3-2.8), P value 0.0007, and 1.85 (1.2-1.7), P value 0.002. EP- and ULKM-derived composite functional outcome showed no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Venous angioplasty can positively impact a few CFMs especially for the quality of life but achieving disability improvement is unlikely.

Plasma cell and B cell-targeted treatments for use in advanced multiple sclerosis.

There is increasing evidence that agents that target peripheral B cells and in some instances plasma cells can exhibit marked effects on relapsing multiple sclerosis. In addition, B cells, including plasma cells, within the central nervous system compartment are likely to play an important role in disease progression in both relapsing and progressive MS. However, current B cell-targeting antibodies may not inhibit these, because of poor penetration into the central nervous system and often oligoclonal bands of immunoglobulin persist within the cerebrospinal fluid despite immunotherapy. Through targeting B cells and plasma cells in the CNS, it may be possible to obtain additional benefit above simple peripheral depletion of B cells. As such there are a number of inhibitors of B cell function and B cell depleting agents that have been developed for myeloma and B cell leukaemia and lymphoma, which could potentially be used off-label or as an experimental treatment for advanced (progressive) MS.

Modulation of host immune responses following non-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Translational implications in progressive multiple sclerosis.

There exists an urgent need for effective treatments for those patients suffering from chronic/progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). Accordingly, it has become readily apparent that different classes of stem cell-based therapies must be explored at both the basic science and clinical levels. Herein, we provide an overview of the basic mechanisms underlying the pre-clinical benefits of exogenously delivered non-hematopoietic stem cells (nHSCs) in animal models of MS. Further, we highlight a number of early clinical trials in which nHSCs have been used to treat MS. Finally, we identify a series of challenges that must be met and ultimately overcome if such promising therapeutics are to be advanced from the bench to the bedside.

Prospective phase II clinical trial of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplant for treatment refractory multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) has been explored as a therapeutic intervention in multiple sclerosis (MS) over the last two decades; however, prospective clinical trials of the most common myeloablative conditioning regimen, BEAM, are limited. Furthermore, patient selection, optimal chemotherapeutic regimen and immunological changes associated with disease response require ongoing exploration. We present the outcomes, safety and immune reconstitution (IR) of patients with active, treatment refractory MS. METHODS: This study was a single-centre, phase II clinical trial of AHSCT for patients with active relapsing remitting (RRMS) and secondary progressive MS (SPMS). Patients underwent AHSCT using BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan)+antithymocyte globulin chemotherapeutic regimen. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was event-free survival (EFS); defined as no clinical or radiological relapses and no disability progression. Multiparameter flow cytometry was performed for evaluation of post-transplant IR in both MS and lymphoma patients receiving the same chemotherapy regimen. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (20 RRMS, 15 SPMS) completed AHSCT, with a median follow-up of 36 months (range 12-66). The median Expanded Disability Status Scores (EDSS) was 6 (2-7) and patients had failed a median of 4 (2-7) disease modifying therapies. 66% failed treatment with natalizumab. EFS at 3 years was 60%, (70% RRMS). Sustained improvement in EDSS was seen in 15 (44%) of patients. There was no treatment-related mortality. A sustained rise in CD39+ T regulatory cells, immunosuppressive CD56hi natural killer cells and ablation of proinflammatory mucosal-associated invariant T cells was seen for 12 months following AHSCT in patients with MS. These changes did not occur in patients with lymphoma receiving the same chemotherapy for AHSCT. CONCLUSIONS: The EFS in our MS cohort is significantly greater than other high-efficacy immunosuppressive therapies and similar to other AHSCT studies despite a more heavily pretreated cohort. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12613000339752.