Low Rate of AVN and Complications in Unstable SCFE With Epiphyseal-metaphyseal Discontinuity After Treatment With a Modified Dunn Procedure.

BACKGROUND: The risk of developing avascular necrosis (AVN) in the setting of an unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) that is undergoing treatment with the modified Dunn procedure is not well understood. In addition, since the Loder classification of unstable is reportedly different than actual intraoperatively observed instability (that is, discontinuity between the femoral head epiphysis and proximal femoral metaphysis), the overall risk of developing AVN, as well as the potential complications of treatment of these patients with the modified Dunn procedure, are unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: To evaluate the modified Dunn procedure for the treatment of patients with epiphyseal-metaphyseal discontinuity, we asked: (1) What was the survivorship free from AVN at 10 years? (2) What was the survivorship free from subsequent surgery and/or complications at 10 years? (3) What were the clinical and patient-reported outcome scores? METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, we identified 159 patients (159 hips) treated with a modified Dunn procedure for SCFE between 1998 and 2020, of whom 97% (155 of 159) had documentation about intraoperatively observed epiphyseal-metaphyseal stability. Of those, 37% (58 of 155) of patients were documented to have intraoperatively observed epiphyseal-metaphyseal discontinuity and were considered eligible for inclusion, whereas 63% (97 of 155) had documented epiphyseal-metaphyseal stability and were excluded. No patients were lost to follow-up before the 2-year minimum. All patients were assessed for survival, but 7% (4 of 58) did not fill out our outcomes score questionnaire. This resulted in 93% (54 of 58) of patients who were available for outcome score assessment. Additionally, 50% (29 of 58) of patients had not been seen within the last 5 years; they are included, but we note that there is uncertainty about their status. The median (range) age at surgery was 13 years (10 to 16), and the sex ratio was 60% (35 of 58) male and 40% (23 of 58) female patients. Sixty-four percent (37 of 58) of patients were classified as acute-on-chronic, and 17% (10 of 58) of patients were classified as acute. Forty-seven percent (27 of 58) of patients presented with severe slips and 43% (25 of 58) of patients with moderate slips based on radiographic classification. All patients underwent surgical hip dislocation with the modified Dunn procedure to correct the slip deformity and provide stabilization. Complications and reoperations were assessed from a review of electronic medical records, and a Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to estimate survivorship free from complications and reoperations at 10 years. Clinical examination results and questionnaire responses were evaluated at minimum 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier survivorship free from AVN was 93% (95% CI 87% to 100%) at 10 years. Survivorship free from any reoperation was 75% (95% CI 64% to 88%) at 10 years. In addition, survivorship free from complications, defined as development of AVN, reoperation, or a Sink Grade II complication or higher, was 57% (95% CI 45% to 73%) at 10 years. The median (range) Merle D'Aubigne Postel score was 18 (14 to 18) for the patients who did not develop AVN, and 12 (6 to 16) for the four patients who developed AVN (p < 0.001). The median modified Harris hip score was 100 (74 to 100) in the non-AVN cohort and 65 (37 to 82) in the AVN cohort (p = 0.001). Median HOOS total score was 95 (50 to 100) in the non-AVN cohort and 53 (40 to 82) in the AVN cohort (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Although the modified Dunn procedure is technically challenging, this study shows that in experienced hands, patients with who have demonstrated epiphyseal-metaphyseal discontinuity can be treated with a low risk of AVN and subsequent surgery. Referral of these patients to specialists who have substantial expertise in this procedure is recommended to improve patient outcomes. Prospective, long-term observational studies will help us identify these high-risk patients preoperatively and determine the long-term success of this procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

[Mid Term Results of Treatment of Unstable Slips of Proximal Femoral Epiphysis by Closed Reduction]. / Strednedobé výsledky lécení nestabilních skluzu proximální epifýzy femuru zavrenou repozicí.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The study aimed to evaluate the results of closed reduction and epiphyseodesis of unstable slips of the proximal femoral epiphysis. The hypothesis was that the clinical and radiological results of this method and incidence of avascular necrosis are comparable to the results of closed reduction and open reduction using surgical hip dislocation reported by literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the period 2013-2023, 20 patients were treated for unstable slips in one institution. Whereas the boys were older (mean age of 13.4 years) than girls (mean age of 11.6 years), the gender distribution was equal. Acute on chronic slips prevailed over the acute slips (ratio 3:1). The slips were treated using the closed reduction, transphyseal fixation and capsular decompression at 6 to 240 hours after slip (81 hours on average). All patients were treated concurrently on the contralateral side as the prevention of the slip or to treat the grade I slips (two patients). The follow-up ranged from 7 months to 7 years. Clinical results were evaluated according to two scores: 1) own score (Bulovka University Hopspital score) based on the reduction of ROM, shortening of extremity and limitations of activities; 2) D'Aubigne-Postel score. In the radiological evaluation, correction of slip angle, alpha-angle, avascular necrosis (AVN) and the prominence of the anterior margin of the femoral neck on axial radiographs were evaluated. RESULTS: According to the Bulovka University Hospital score, there were 10 excellent results (50%) with no limitation of activity, including sport, in tree cases the results were very good (15%) and in five cases good (25%), respectively, with some limitation of activity, and two results were unsatisfactory (10%) with severe limitation of activity due to the AVN. According to the D'Aubigne-Postel score, there were 14 excellent results (70%), four good results (20%), and two unsatisfactory results (10%). The slip reduction was as follows: under 20 deg. in five patients; under 30 deg. in 10 patients, and over 30 deg. in five patients, respectively. Alfa-angle was greater than 63 degrees (range 45-88 deg.) on average. Prominence of the off-set epiphysis-femoral neck and femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) were observed in six patients. Remodelling of this prominence was seen in one patient four years after surgery. Shortening of the femoral neck over 1 cm was reported in two patients. Complete AVN with severe deformity of the hip was noted in two patients. DISCUSSION: Our hypothesis was confirmed because the results of treatment of the unstable slips by closed reduction are comparable with the published results of the same method and with surgical hip dislocation. The results correspond with those of large published cohorts of patients concerning the correction as well as rate of complications. CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, urgent gentle closed reduction, transphyseal fixation and capsular decompression represent efficient and relatively safe methods of treatment of unstable slips with low incidence of complication. Residual deformity of the off-set epiphysis-femoral neck and FAI represent limitations of this method. KEY WORDS: slipped proximal femoral epiphysis, unstable slips, closed reduction, transphyseal fixation.

Outcomes of the Modified Dunn Procedure Versus Delayed Imhauser Osteotomy for Moderate to Severe Stable Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.

BACKGROUND: Traditional management of moderate to severe stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) has been in situ fixation followed by reconstructive surgery if symptoms arise. This delayed approach may lead to irreversible intra-articular damage of the hip over time. The purpose of this study was to compare radiographic and clinical outcomes of the modified Dunn procedure (MDP) versus in situ fixation followed by delayed Imhauser osteotomy (DIO). METHODS: This was a retrospective study from a single institution between 2001 and 2021. Among 250 patients diagnosed with SCFE, a total of 18 (18 hips) treated with MDP and 16 (18 hips) treated with DIO for moderate to severe stable SCFE were included. Most patients who underwent DIO either had concomitant (11/18 hips) or subsequent (2/18 hips) open osteochondroplasty. Mean follow up was 4.7 years (range: 1 to 12.8 y). Radiographs were reviewed to measure Southwick angle, anteroposterior and lateral alpha (α) angles, and femoral head-neck offset ratio preoperatively and at latest follow up. Charts were reviewed for demographics, subsequent surgeries, complications, and Heyman-Herndon clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The amount of deformity correction was greater in the MDP than DIO group based on anteroposterior α angles (mean: 22.3 vs. 11.9 degrees, P =0.046) and femoral head-neck offset ratios (mean: 0.26 vs. 0.12, P =0.001). There was no significant difference in Heyman-Herndon scores (both 16/18, 88.9% good to excellent outcomes, P >0.999). Less reoperations were performed in the MDP than DIO group (2/18, 11.1% vs. 9/18, 50%; P =0.004). AVN occurred in 2/18 hips (11.1%) in the MDP group with both surgeries performed early in the series and underwent prior in situ screw fixation compared with 0/18 hips (0%) in the DIO group ( P =0.486). One patient in the DIO group was later diagnosed with osteoarthritis. CONCLUSIONS: MDP resulted in more anatomic coronal and sagittal plane deformity correction, less reoperations, and similar Heyman-Herndon clinical outcomes compared with DIO. AVN occurred in the MDP group whereas osteoarthritis occurred in the DIO group. These complications must be weighed against improved long-term clinical results for patients who would otherwise be at risk for premature degenerative joint disease due to residual proximal femoral deformity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Pulmonary Embolism in Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber Syndrome With Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.

CASE: A 12-year-old boy with Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber syndrome underwent surgery for unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis who developed pulmonary embolism postoperatively. CONCLUSION: It is important to be vigilant about pulmonary embolism in children because it is rare but potentially fatal, especially in the presence of risk factors. Early diagnosis and treatment of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis are crucial to minimize immobility. Close monitoring of femoral head osteonecrosis is also necessary.

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis after tumor prosthesis implantation in a patient receiving chemotherapy.

While the usual etiology of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is idiopathic, there are many other factors that increase the predisposition to slippage. Chemotherapy can be one of them. In this article, we report a rare case of acute SCFE after tumor prosthesis implantation in a patient who received chemotherapy. A 10-year-old girl with osteosarcoma of the right distal femur underwent (neo-) adjuvant chemotherapy, wide tumor resection, and reconstruction using a growing tumor prosthesis and a short non-cemented femoral stem. Half a year after implantation, she developed aseptic loosening. Revision surgery was performed using a hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated cementless femoral stem. Postoperative plain radiographs revealed SCFE that was treated by closed reduction and screw fixation. The patient recovered without complications, and unaffected hip showed no radiographic signs of slippage on follow-up. The forces of implanting a tumor prosthesis, particularly with a non-cemented stem, can increase the risk of an acute SCFE. The controversy over prophylactic pinning of the uninvolved hip in chemotherapy-associated SCFE is unresolved. Pinning can be considered only in the presence of abnormal prodromal radiological findings.

Bilateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis in a Young Girl Treated With Chemotherapy: A Case Report.

CASE: A 1-year-old girl was treated with chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation because of CD40 ligand deficiency. Four years later, she presented with pain in her right leg, diagnosed as atypical acute slipped capital femoral epiphysis, without a clear cause, besides chemotherapy possibly. She was treated with fixation of the epiphysis with a cannulated screw. Two years later, the same diagnosis was made for the left hip and the same surgery was applied. After the 2-year follow-up, clinical outcomes were good. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy may be a risk factor for atypical slipped capital femoral epiphysis, even without the combination with radiotherapy.

Medium-long-term follow-up of slipped capital femoral epiphysis treated with in situ fixation and patient-acceptable symptom state evaluation.

This study evaluates the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) treated with in situ fixation, focusing on medium to long-term outcomes and quality of life. Its primary goal is to establish a subjective well-being cutoff, using subjective methods and the iHOT33 scale, for assessing patients in future studies. Additionally, it explores functionality differences between mild and moderate-severe SCFE, case series epidemiology and potential complications. A retrospective analysis of 63 patients (73 hips), treated for SCFE between 2000 and 2017 at our facility using in situ fixation, was conducted. These patients underwent clinical, anamnestic, and radiological assessments, with PASS determined based on iHOT33 questionnaire results and statistical analysis. The mean age at surgery was 12.95 years (±1.64, range 9-17), with an average follow-up of 11 years (±4.60, range 5-20). At follow-up, 87% of patients reported achieving PASS, with higher iHOT33 scores correlating to PASS. A cutoff of >68 on the iHOT33 scale showed strong predictive ability for assessing PASS (area under the curve 0.857, 88.89% sensitivity, 79.69% specificity). The findings indicate that 87% of patients achieved PASS at medium to long-term follow-up, with better clinical function than those who did not report PASS. The iHOT33 scale's effectiveness in predicting PASS, especially with a cutoff of >68, suggests this method's efficacy. Given these positive outcomes, including in moderate-severe cases treated with in situ fixation, this approach is considered a viable therapeutic option.

Is Subcapital Realignment for Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis a Reproducible Technique? Midterm Results.

BACKGROUND: The modified Dunn procedure, which is based on the development of an extended retinacular flap containing the blood supply for the femoral head, allows anatomic reestablishment in patients with moderate to severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Some controversy exists regarding the short-term to midterm risk of avascular necrosis (AVN) and other complications resulting from the surgical technique. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What percentage of patients treated with an extended retinacular flap during the modified Dunn procedure for SCFE with a moderate (slip angle from 30° to 60°) or severe slip (slip angle equal or greater than 60°) develop symptomatic AVN, and what percentage underwent further surgery or had other complications? (2) What femoral head-neck alignment and position parameters relative to the greater trochanter are achieved after surgery? (3) Can we identify radiographic signs of osteoarthritis at a minimum of 4 years after surgery? METHODS: Between January 2006 and December 2018, we treated 61 patients for SCFE. During this time, we generally used the modified Dunn procedure when the slip angle was ≥ 30°. Based on this indication, the modified Dunn procedure was performed in 37 patients (41 hips) during that time period, and those patients were potentially eligible for this retrospective study. Because bilateral hips in the same patient are not statistically independent, for our analyses, we analyzed only the hip with the longer follow-up time. Of those who remained, 11% (4) were lost before the minimum study follow-up of 48 months or had incomplete datasets, leaving 89% (33) for analysis here at a median follow-up of 80 months (range 49 to 208 months). Periacetabular osteotomy or subtrochanteric rotational femoral osteotomy was added under the same anaesthesia time in 33% (11 patients). We added periacetabular osteotomy in 24% (8) when intraoperative anterior instability was present in external rotation. A femoral rotational osteotomy was added in 9% (3) when posterior instability was present in flexion and internal rotation. The mean ± standard deviation age at the time of surgery was 13 ± 1 years, and 33% (11 of 33) of patients were female. The mean slip angle was 51° ± 16º, and 15% (5) of hips had unstable slips, defined as an inability to walk with or without crutches. We documented chronic presentations in 82% (27) of patients, acute and chronic in 12% (4), and acute in 6% (2). The rate of symptomatic AVN was determined by reviewing all radiographs obtained at the latest follow-up interval. Further surgery and other complications were assessed through an electronic medical record review. Radiographic morphologic parameters were measured before surgery and at a minimum follow-up of 4 years by two senior orthopaedic surgeons. Radiographs obtained at the latest follow-up visit were also screened for signs of osteoarthritis by the same surgeons. RESULTS: At the latest follow-up, 3% (1 patient) of patients developed symptomatic AVN and underwent further surgery and 3% (1) underwent revision surgery for screw breakage after a high-energy fall. Postoperatively, the alpha angle was restored to 39º ± 6º, the anterior head-neck offset was restored to 8 ± 3 mm, the neck-shaft angle was 136º ± 6º, and the presence of a positive Klein line decreased from 64% (21 hips) to 0% (0 hips). No patients showed radiographic signs of osteoarthritis at the minimum follow-up of 4 years. CONCLUSION: In this series, the modified Dunn procedure in moderate and severe slips was a reproducible procedure, and few patients developed symptomatic AVN or experienced other complications. Hip morphology was restored, but a longer follow-up duration and a detailed analysis of the results from other centers is warranted to assess the possible long-term risk of progression to AVN or osteoarthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Rate and Risk Factors for Contralateral Slippage in Adolescents Treated for Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: A Comprehensive Analysis of 3,528 Cases.

BACKGROUND: After a unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), the contralateral hip is at risk for a subsequent SCFE. However, further information with regard to risk factors involved in the development of contralateral SCFE must be investigated. The purpose of this study was to report the rate and risk factors for subsequent contralateral SCFE in adolescents treated for unilateral SCFE by exploring a mix of known and potential risk factors. METHODS: A case-control study utilizing aggregated multi-institutional electronic medical record data between January 2003 and March 2023 was conducted. Patients <18 years of age diagnosed with SCFE who underwent surgical management were included. Variables associated with contralateral SCFE were identified using multivariable logistic regression models that adjusted for patient characteristics and time of the surgical procedure, providing adjusted odds ratios (ORs). The false discovery rate was accounted for via the Benjamini-Hochberg method. RESULTS: In this study, 15.3% of patients developed contralateral SCFE at a mean (and standard error) of 296.53 ± 17.23 days and a median of 190 days following the initial SCFE. Increased thyrotropin (OR, 1.43 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04 to 1.97]; p = 0.022), diabetes mellitus (OR, 1.67 [95% CI, 1.22 to 2.49]; p = 0.005), severe obesity (OR, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.56 to 2.57]; p < 0.001), history of human growth hormone use (OR, 1.85 [95% CI, 1.10 to 3.38]; p = 0.032), low vitamin D (OR, 5.75 [95% CI, 2.23 to 13.83]; p < 0.001), younger age in boys (under 12 years of age: OR, 1.85 [95% CI, 1.37 to 2.43]; p < 0.001) and in girls (under 11 years of age: OR, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.05 to 2.02]; p = 0.026), and tobacco exposure (OR, 2.43 [95% CI, 1.49 to 3.87]; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with increased odds of developing contralateral SCFE. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest study on this topic, we identified the rate, odds, and risk factors associated with development of contralateral SCFE. We found younger age, hypothyroidism, severe obesity, low vitamin D, diabetes mellitus, and a history of human growth hormone use to be independent risk factors. Our findings can aid clinical decision-making in at-risk patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

In situ fixation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis carries a greater than 40% risk of later total hip arthroplasty during a long-term follow-up.

Aims: We aimed to assess the cumulative risk of total hip arthroplasty (THA) from in situ fixation for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) after a follow-up of almost 50 years. Methods: In this study, 138 patients with 172 affected hips treated with in situ fixation were evaluated retrospectively. A total of 97 patients (70%) were male and the mean age was 13.6 years (SD 2.1); 35 patients (25%) had a bilateral disease. The median follow-up time was 49 years (interquartile range 43 to 55). Basic demographic, stability, and surgical details were obtained from patient records. Preoperative radiographs (slip angle; SA) were measured, and data on THA was gathered from the Finnish National Arthroplasty Register. Results: The preoperative SA was a mean of 39° (SD 19°). At follow-up, 56 of the patients had undergone THA for a hip previously fixed in situ for SCFE (41%) and 64 of all affected hips had been replaced (37%). Kaplan-Meier analysis gave a median prosthesis-free postoperative survival of 55 years (95% confidence interval (CI) 45 to 64) for the affected hips. In a multivariate analysis, female patients had a two-fold risk for THA (hazard ratio (HR) 2.42 (95% CI 1.16 to 5.07)) and a greater preoperative SA increased the risk of THA (HR 1.03 for every increment of 1° (95% CI 1.01 to 1.05)), while patient age at surgery, slip laterality, stability of slip, or diagnostic delay did not have a statistically significant effect on the risk of THA. Conclusion: SCFE treated primarily with in situ fixation may lead to THA in more than 40% of affected hips at a near 50-year follow-up. This risk is approximately 15-times the reported lifetime risk in the Finnish general population. Female sex and increasing preoperative SA significantly predicted higher risk of THA.

Comparison of three radiographic assessment methods for detecting slipped capital femoral epiphyses in cats: Klein's line, modified Klein's line and the S-sign.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to investigate whether diagnostic assessment methods used on radiographs in humans with slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) can be used in cats. METHODS: The ventrodorsal (VD) extended-leg and VD frog-leg pelvic radiographs of 20 cats with SCFE without fully displaced femoral capital epiphyses (FCE), eight cats with fully displaced FCE and five control cats with normal pelvic anatomy were assessed by five observers on two separate occasions 3 months apart. The Klein's line and modified Klein's line were assessed on each VD extended-leg radiograph, and the S-sign was assessed on each VD extended-leg and VD frog-leg radiograph. RESULTS: Excluding cases of fully displaced FCE, the S-sign on the VD frog-leg radiographs more accurately diagnosed SCFE than the S-sign on the VD extended-leg radiographs and the Klein's line (92.4% vs 88.8% vs 60.6%, respectively), and had the greatest sensitivity (93.9% vs 79.2% vs 30.6%, respectively). The S-sign on the VD extended-leg radiographs had greater specificity than the Klein's line and S-sign on the VD frog-leg radiographs (99.2% vs 97.9% vs 90.9%, respectively). The modified Klein's line detected SCFE in 40.2% of cases that were negative for the Klein's line. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The S-sign in both VD extended-leg and VD frog-leg views successfully detected SCFE in cats and can be used to increase early diagnosis and treatment in cats with SCFE that have only subtle radiographic changes.

[Clinical aspects of imaging the hip in infants, children and adolescents]. / Klinische Aspekte zur Bildgebung der kindlichen und adoleszenten Hüfte.

When a child with a hip problem is clinically evaluated, it is usually possible to make a presumptive diagnosis which is subsequently confirmed. The most important tool for confirmation in pediatric hip disorders is radiological imaging. Vice versa changes on sonogram, native X­ray or magnetic resonance images (MRI) can often only be interpreted when the history and current clinical findings are known. In this constellation, it is desirable that all colleagues who are confronted with a child's hip problem know the most common and important pediatric hip disorders and use the same terminology. The aim of this article is to present a short outline of the pathogenesis and clinical aspects of congenital and neurogenic hip dysplasia, coxitis fugax, septic coxitis, Perthes' disease, infantile and adolescent femoroacetabular impingement, apophysiolyses, and slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Which factor is more reliable considering prophylactic pinning of contralateral hip of unilateral SCFE patients?

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the radiological parameters of developing subsequent contralateral slips in unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) patients at the time of initial presentation. METHODS: The study group included the review of unilateral SCFE patients treated between June 2007 and August 2018. Age, gen-der, side, stability, posterior slope angle, grade of slip, modified Oxford bone age score (mOBAS), the Risser classification, and the ap-pearance of the triradiate cartilage were evaluated retrospectively. Data were analyzed between two groups: subsequent contralateral SCFE (SCFESC) patients that developed contralateral slip during follow-up and unilateral SCFE (SCFEU) patients that did not develop contralateral slip up to skeletal maturity. Descriptive statistics were used to compare risk factors between groups. RESULTS: This study included 48 patients and 6 patients (12.5%) developed a SCFESC. Only mOBAS was significantly different be-tween groups. The mOBAS scores in SCFESC were 18 in 2 patients (33.3%), 19 in 4 patients (66.7%). The mOBAS scores in SCFEU were 18 in 1 patient (2.4%), 19 in 24 patients (57.1%), and >20 in 17 patients (40.5%). In the SCFESC group, all patients had a Risser score of 0 and all had open triradiate cartilage. CONCLUSION: Patients with unilateral SCFE are at risk for SCFESC, and the mOBAS is the best predictor of risk assessment. We agree that mOBAS score of 16,17 or 18 patients' contralateral hips can be prophylactically pinned. We also suggest pinning or close screening of mOBAS 19 patients that some carry relatively high risk of subsequent contralateral slip.

Surgeon Preference for Prophylactic Contralateral Fixation in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis (SCFE) Patients: A Nationwide POSNA Survey Study.

BACKGROUND: It is estimated that 11% to 60% of unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) patients will develop contralateral pathology, usually within 18 months after the first event. Despite this, prophylactic fixation remains controversial, and there is significant variability in surgeon preferences. Thus, this study aimed to determine which factors predict surgeon preferences for prophylactic contralateral pinning in SCFE patients. METHODS: We designed a survey for pediatric orthopedic surgeons to collect data on (1) surgeon and hospital characteristics, (2) individual preference for contralateral SCFE pinning in three disparate hypothetical scenarios, and (3) personal risk-aversion traits. The questionnaire was distributed across the United States by the POSNA Evidence-Based Orthopaedics Committee. All POSNA members were eligible to respond. We performed analyses to evaluate the role of patient risk factors in hypothetical surgical decision-making and to determine if surgical training, hospital characteristics, and geographic region influenced prophylactic pinning in a surgeon's real-life practice. RESULTS: A total of 126 POSNA members responded to the survey. In the last year, a median of 6.5 SCFE patients was seen per surgeon (1243 patients total). A median of 10% of those patients underwent prophylactic contralateral fixation. In multiple analyses, surgeons were influenced by body mass index, open triradiate cartilage, patient race, various endocrine abnormalities, and specific radiographic measurements when deciding to fix the contralateral side prophylactically. Moreover, in multivariate regression, more years in practice and a hospital size of 500+ beds predicted fewer prophylactic fixation procedures (all P <0.05). Surgeons practicing in the South Atlantic, New England, and Mountain regions of the United States estimated the highest rate of contralateral pinning. CONCLUSIONS: This study's findings suggest that multiple factors influence surgeons' decisions to prophylactically fix the contralateral side in SCFE patients. Surgical training, hospital characteristics, and geographical regions played a role in decision-making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Effects of joint loading on the development of capital femoral epiphysis morphology.

INTRODUCTION: The deleterious influence of increased mechanical forces on capital femoral epiphysis development is well established; however, the growth of the physis in the absence of such forces remains unclear. The hips of non-ambulatory cerebral palsy (CP) patients provide a weight-restricted (partial weightbearing) model which can elucidate the influence of decreased mechanical forces on the development of physis morphology, including features related to development of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Here we used 3D image analysis to compare the physis morphology of children with non-ambulatory CP, as a model for abnormal hip loading, with age-matched native hips. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT images of 98 non-ambulatory CP hips (8-15 years) and 80 age-matched native control hips were used to measure height, width, and length of the tubercle, depth, width, and length of the metaphyseal fossa, and cupping height across different epiphyseal regions. The impact of age on morphology was assessed using Pearson correlations. Mixed linear model was used to compare the quantified morphological features between partial weightbearing hips and full weightbearing controls. RESULTS: In partial weightbearing hips, tubercle height and length along with fossa depth and length significantly decreased with age, while peripheral cupping height increased with age (r > 0.2, P < 0.04). Compared to normally loaded (full weightbearing) hips and across all age groups, partially weightbearing hips' epiphyseal tubercle height and length were smaller (P < .05), metaphyseal fossa depth was larger (P < .01), and posterior, inferior, and anterior peripheral cupping heights were smaller (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Smaller epiphyseal tubercle and peripheral cupping with greater metaphyseal fossa size in partial weightbearing hips suggests that the growing capital femoral epiphysis requires mechanical stimulus to adequately develop epiphyseal stabilizers. Deposit low prevalence and relevance of SCFE in CP, these findings highlight both the role of normal joint loading in proper physis development and how chronic abnormal loading may contribute to various pathomorphological changes of the proximal femur (i.e., capital femoral epiphysis).

A Comparison Between 3 Functional Hip Scores for Evaluation of the Pediatric Hip.

BACKGROUND: This investigation aimed to determine the degree of correlation among 3 functional scales for evaluating the hip in pediatric patients and determine the correlation between measures of global function and outcome. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 173 consecutive patients (M age = 13 ± 3 y) being followed for developmental dysplasia of the hip (n = 122, 71%), slipped capital femoral epiphysis (n = 31, 18%), or Legg-Calve-Perthes disease (n = 20, 12%). We evaluated patients clinically, and we compiled scores for the Iowa Hip Score (IHS), Harris Hip Score (HHS), and Children's Hospital Oakland Hip Evaluation Scale (CHOHES). Patients concomitantly completed the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) at the same clinic visit. We assessed Global Functioning Scale the and the Sports and Physical Functioning Core Scale of the PODCI. We determined the degree of correlation between the functional hip scales and between each scale and the PODCI scales using Spearman rank correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The correlations between the IHS, HHS, and CHOHES scores were robust (IHS and HHS ρ = 0.991; IHS and CHOHES ρ = 0.933; HHS and CHOHES ρ = 0.938; all P < 0.001). The correlation between the Global Functioning Scale of the PODCI and the 3 hip scores was ρ = 0.343 for the IHS, ρ = 0.341 for the HHS, and ρ = 0.352 for the CHOHES (all P < 0.001). The correlation between the sports and physical functioning core scale of the PODCI and the 3 hip scores was ρ = 0.324 for the IHS, ρ = 0.329 for the HHS, and ρ = 0.346 for the CHOHES (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a pediatric population with diverse hip pathology, there was a very strong correlation between scores on the IHS, HHS, and CHOHES. However, none of these 3 most commonly used hip scores correlated strongly with the global functioning scale or sports and physical functioning core scale of the PODCI. The most frequently used scores to determine the outcome of pediatric patients with hip pathology correlate strongly with each other but do not necessarily relate to global functional results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

The Free-Gliding screw for slipped capital femoral epiphysis : is it safe, does it glide, and does age matter?

AIMS: Fixation techniques used in the treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) that allow continued growth of the femoral neck, rather than inducing epiphyseal fusion in situ, have the advantage of allowing remodelling of the deformity. The aims of this study were threefold: to assess whether the Free-Gliding (FG) SCFE screw prevents further slip; to establish whether, in practice, it enables lengthening and gliding; and to determine whether the age of the patient influences the extent of glide. METHODS: All patients with SCFE who underwent fixation using FG SCFE screws after its introduction at our institution, with minimum three years' follow-up, were reviewed retrospectively as part of ongoing governance. All pre- and postoperative radiographs were evaluated. The demographics of the patients, the grade of slip, the extent of lengthening of the barrel of the screw and the restoration of Klein's line were recorded. Subanalysis was performed according to sex and age. RESULTS: A total of 19 hips in 13 patients were included. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 11.5 years (9 to 13) and the mean follow-up was 63 months (45 to 83). A total of 13 FG SCFE screws were used for the fixation of mild or moderate SCFE, with six contralateral prophylactic fixations. No hip with SCFE showed a further slip after fixation and there were no complications. Lengthening occurred in 15 hips (79%), with a mean lengthening of the barrel of 6.8 mm (2.5 to 13.6) at final follow-up. Remodelling occurred in all hips with lengthening of the barrel. There was statistically more lengthening in patients who were aged < 12 years, regardless of sex (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The FG SCFE screw is effective in preventing further slip in patients with SCFE. Lengthening of the barrel occurred in most hips, and thus allowed remodelling. This was most marked in younger children, regardless of sex. Based on this study, this device should be considered for use in patients with SCFE aged < 12 years instead of standard pinning in situ.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(2):215-219.