Application of enamel matrix derivative and deproteinized bovine bone for the treatment of peri-implantitis after decontamination with an ultrasonic scaler: A case report.

RATIONALE: The purpose of this report is to present a case of peri-implantitis with successful regeneration. The surface of the affected dental implant was decontaminated with an ultrasonic scaler and treated with bovine-derived hydroxyapatite and enamel matrix derivative. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 52-year-old male was referred for evaluation of a dental implant placed in the mandibular right second premolar area. DIAGNOSIS: The radiographic evaluation showed the loss of supporting bone around the dental implant. Bleeding upon probing and suppuration were observed, with the deepest probing depth at 6 mm. INTERVENTIONS: The area was firstly treated with a nonsurgical approach. After re-evaluation, a full-thickness flap was elevated. The area was well debrided using various instruments, including curettes and an ultrasonic scaler. The defect area was grafted with bovine-derived hydroxyapatite and enamel matrix derivative. OUTCOMES: Histopathologic evaluation revealed chronic inflammation with fibrosis and calcification. The evaluation at 2 years and 3 months after surgery showed that the prosthesis was functioning well. Bleeding upon probing and suppuration was not noted, and reduction of probing depth was seen, with the deepest depth at 4 mm. The area showed maintenance of graft material with increased radiopacity around the dental implant. LESSONS: In conclusion, a case of peri-implantitis can be successfully treated with bovine-derived hydroxyapatite and enamel matrix derivative after surface decontamination with an ultrasonic scaler.

Xenogenous Collagen Matrix and/or Enamel Matrix Derivative for Treatment of Localized Gingival Recessions: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Part II: Patient-Reported Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Gingival recession (GR) might be associated with patient discomfort due to cervical dentin hypersensitivity (CDH) and esthetic dissatisfaction. The aim is to evaluate the effect of root coverage procedure with a xenogenous collagen matrix (CM) and/or enamel matrix derivative (EMD) in combination with a coronally advanced flap (CAF) on CDH, esthetics, and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of patients with GR. METHODS: Sixty-eight participants with single Miller Class I/II GRs were treated with CAF (n = 17), CAF + CM (n = 17), CAF + EMD (n = 17), and CAF + CM + EMD (n = 17). CDH was assessed by evaporative stimuli using a visual analog scale (VAS) and a Schiff scale. Esthetics outcome was assessed with VAS and the Questionnaire of Oral Esthetic Satisfaction. Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) questionnaire was used to assess OHRQoL. All parameters were evaluated at baseline and after 6 months. RESULTS: Intragroup analysis showed statistically significant reduction in CDH and esthetic dissatisfaction with no intergroup significant differences (P >0.05). The impact of oral health on QoL after 6 months was significant for CAF + CM, CAF + EMD, and CAF + CM + EMD (P <0.05). Total OHIP-14 score and psychologic discomfort, psychologic disability, social disability, and handicap dimensions showed negative correlation with esthetics. OHIP-14 physical pain dimension had positive correlation with CDH (P <0.05). OHIP-14 showed no correlation with percentage of root coverage, keratinized tissue width, or keratinized tissue thickness (P >0.05). CONCLUSION: Root coverage procedures improve patient OHRQoL by impacting on a wide range of dimensions, perceived after reduction of CDH and esthetic dissatisfaction of patients with GRs treated with CAF + CM, CAF + EMD, and CAF + CM + EMD.

Xenogenous Collagen Matrix and/or Enamel Matrix Derivative for Treatment of Localized Gingival Recessions: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Part I: Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Considering xenogeneic collagen matrix (CM) and enamel matrix derivative (EMD) characteristics, it is suggested that their combination could promote superior clinical outcomes in root coverage procedures. Thus, the aim of this parallel, double-masked, dual-center, randomized clinical trial is to evaluate clinical outcomes after treatment of localized gingival recession (GR) by a coronally advanced flap (CAF) combined with CM and/or EMD. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients presenting one Miller Class I or II GRs were randomly assigned to receive either CAF (n = 17); CAF + CM (n = 17); CAF + EMD (n = 17), or CAF + CM + EMD (n = 17). Recession height, probing depth, clinical attachment level, and keratinized tissue width and thickness were measured at baseline and 90 days and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: The obtained root coverage was 68.04% ± 24.11% for CAF; 87.20% ± 15.01% for CAF + CM; 88.77% ± 20.66% for CAF + EMD; and 91.59% ± 11.08% for CAF + CM + EMD after 6 months. Groups that received biomaterials showed greater values (P <0.05). Complete root coverage (CRC) for CAF + EMD was 70.59%, significantly superior to CAF alone (23.53%); CAF + CM (52.94%), and CAF + CM + EMD (51.47%) (P <0.05). Keratinized tissue thickness gain was significant only in CM-treated groups (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The three approaches are superior to CAF alone for root coverage. EMD provides highest levels of CRC; however, the addition of CM increases gingival thickness. The combination approach does not seem justified.

Tooth hard tissue stimulates bone remodeling as a potential motive force during tooth eruption.

Tooth eruption is an orientating action which migrates teeth coronally during life, even in bone or after occlusion contact is lost. The eruption pathway is due to bone resorption near the enamel crown and bone deposition around the cementum-covered roots. Due to their proximity to bone resorption and deposition, we hypothesize that the hard tissues enamel, dentine or cementum are important during eruption. In the present study, extracted human teeth were cut into enamel samples, enamel-dentine samples or dentine-cementum samples, and implanted into bone defects in rabbit tibia. Hematoxylin and eosin, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase activity, tetracycline tracing and scanning electron microscopy were used to investigate bone resorption and deposition 1-8 weeks after surgery. The results showed that resorption lacunae with numerous osteoclasts were observed facing enamel and significant new bone deposition occurred near the cementum surface, compared to other hard tooth surfaces. These findings indicate that the enamel crown may stimulate bone resorption and initiate the eruption pathway, and that the cementum root may stimulate bone deposition. Bone regeneration initiated by tooth hard tissues may be a potential motive force during tooth eruption.

Tissue engineered hybrid tooth-bone constructs.

Proper rehabilitation of craniofacial defects is challenging because of the complexity of the anatomy and the component tissue types. The ability to simultaneously coordinate the regeneration of multiple tissues would make reconstruction more efficient and might reduce morbidity and improve outcomes. The craniofacial complex is unique because of the presence of teeth, in addition to skin, bone, cartilage, muscle, vascular, and neural tissues since teeth naturally grow in coordination with the craniofacial skeleton, our group developed an autologous, tooth-bone hybrid model to facilitate repair of mandibular defects in the Yucatan minipig. The hybrid tooth-bone construct was prepared by combining tooth bud cell-seeded scaffolds with autologous iliac crest bone marrow derived stem cell-seeded scaffolds, which were transplanted back into surgically created mandibular defects in the same minipig. The constructs were harvested after 12 and 20 weeks of growth. The resulting bone/tooth constructs were evaluated by X-ray, ultra high-resolution volume computed tomography (VCT), histological, immunohistochemical analyses, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The observed formation of small tooth-like structures consisting of organized dentin, enamel, pulp, cementum, periodontal ligament, and surrounded by regenerated alveolar bone, suggests the feasibility for regeneration of teeth and associated alveolar bone, in a single procedure. This model provides an accessible method for future clinical applications in humans.

Biological restorations as a treatment option for primary molars with extensive coronal destruction: report of two cases

This article reports the cases of two young children aged 4 and 5 years, in whom biological restorations using tooth fragments were placed in primary molars with severely damaged crowns due to extensive carious lesions. After radiographic and clinical evaluation, tooth fragments obtained from extracted teeth in stock were autoclaved, adjusted to the prepared cavity and bonded to the remaining tooth structure with either adhesive system (Case 1) or dual-cure resin-based cement (Case 2) over a calcium hydroxide layer and a glass ionomer cement base. Occlusal adjustment was performed and topical sodium fluoride was applied to tooth surface. Periodical clinical and radiographic controls were carried out and the restored teeth were followed up for 4 and 3 years, respectively, until exfoliation. In these two reports, the technical aspects are described and the benefits and disadvantages of biological restorations as an alternative treatment for rehabilitation of severely destroyed primary molars are discussed.

Este artigo descreve dois casos clínicos de reconstrução de molares decíduos com extensa destruição coronária por meio de restaurações biológicas, em crianças de 4 e 5 anos. Após avaliação clínica e radiográfica, os fragmentos dentais heterógenos foram submetidos à colagem ao remanescente dental preparado usando sistema adesivo (Caso 1) ou cimento resinoso de presa dual (Caso 2) sobre uma camada de hidróxido de cálcio e uma base de ionômero de vidro. Foi realizado ajuste oclusal e aplicação tópica de flúor sobre a superfície dentária. Controles clínico e radiográfico foram realizados periodicamente e os dentes restaurados foram acompanhados por 4 e 3 anos respectivamente, até a exfoliação. Por meio destes dois relatos, os autores discutem os aspectos técnicos, além das vantagens e desvantagens das restaurações biológicas como tratamento alternativo para restauração de molares decíduos.