Severe Anemia from Multiple Gastric Hyperplastic Polyps in a Hemodialysis Patient after Long-term Use of a Proton-pump Inhibitor.

A 90-year-old man on maintenance hemodialysis was admitted due to severe symptomatic anemia. Biopsies under esophagogastroduodenoscopy demonstrated that the cause of anemia was intermittent blood oozing from multiple gastric hyperplastic polyps. Even after successful eradication of Helicobacter pylori, he showed hypergastrinemia (480 pg/mL) owing to esomeprazole (proton-pump inhibitor) therapy for the past 4.5 years to treat reflux esophagitis. Seven months after we switched esomeprazole to famotidine (H2-receptor antagonist), those gastric polyps and anemia were remarkably ameliorated with lowered gastrin levels. This case indicates that long-term use of a proton-pump inhibitor triggers chronic hypergastrinemia, leading to gastric hyperplastic polyps and subsequent severe anemia.

Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fexuprazan compared with esomeprazole in erosive esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Fexuprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, reversibly suppresses the K+/H+-ATPase enzyme in proton pumps within gastric parietal cells. Fexuprazan's suppression of gastric acid was maintained in healthy individuals for 24 h in a dose-dependent manner. AIM: To compare fexuprazan to esomeprazole and establish its efficacy and safety in patients with erosive esophagitis (EE). METHODS: Korean adult patients with endoscopically confirmed EE were randomized 1:1 to receive fexuprazan 40 mg or esomeprazole 40 mg once daily for eight weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with healed EE confirmed by endoscopy at week 8. The secondary endpoints included the healing rate of EE at week 4, symptom response, and quality of life assessment. Safety profiles and serum gastrin levels were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Of the 263 randomized, 218 completed the study per protocol (fexuprazan 40 mg, n = 107; esomeprazole 40 mg, n = 111). Fexuprazan was non-inferior to esomeprazole regarding the healing rate at week 8 [99.1% (106/107) vs 99.1% (110/111)]. There were no between-group differences in the EE healing rate at week 4 [90.3% (93/103) vs 88.5% (92/104)], symptom responses, and quality of life assessments. Additionally, serum gastrin levels at weeks 4 and 8 and drug-related side effects did not significantly differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: Fexuprazan 40 mg is non-inferior to esomeprazole 40 mg in EE healing at week 8. We suggest that fexuprazan is an alternative promising treatment option to PPIs for patients with EE.

Suppression of vacuolar-type ATPase and induction of endoplasmic reticulum stress by proton pump inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), such as esomeprazole, pantoprazole, dexlansoprazole, and rabeprazole, are one of the most commonly prescribed medications. Several studies have linked the long-term use of PPIs to a potentially increased risk of gastric cancer. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the underlying mechanism of PPI-mediated gastric cancer. METHODS: Lysosomes were isolated using immunoprecipitation. The inhibition of vacuolar-type ATPase (V-ATPase) by PPIs was assayed using a PiColorLock Gold Phosphate Detection System. PPI-induced lysosomal stress was analyzed using transcription factor EB (TFEB) nuclear translocation. PPI-induced endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress was analyzed using the expression of protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), inositol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1), and activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6). Finally, reactive oxygen species (ROS) removal was determined using the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD). RESULTS: PPIs caused a 70% inhibition of V-ATPase activity at 20 µM, leading to lysosomal stress through TFEB nuclear translocation; ER stress by inducing the expression of PERK, IRE1, and ATF6; and enhanced SOD activity for ROS removal. CONCLUSION: The long-term use of PPIs inhibits lysosomal V-ATPase, leading to ER stress and ROS accumulation, which may result in an increased risk of gastric cancer. Because lysosomes and the ER are common organelles in cells, physicians prescribing PPIs for gastroesophageal reflux and peptic ulcer diseases should pay more attention to the general effects of these agents on the human body.

Randomised clinical trial: comparison of efficacy and adverse effects of a standard triple clarithromycin-containing regimen with high-dose amoxicillin and bismuth therapy in Helicobacter pylori eradication.

BACKGROUND: The clarithromycin-based triple therapy is the most prescribed Helicobacter pylori eradication regimen in Europe; it causes adverse effects in a significant proportion of subjects, leading to discontinuation. Alternative therapies are required because of increasing clarithromycin resistance or to decrease the adverse effects. AIMS: We compared the efficacy and spectrum of adverse effects of clarithromycin-based triple therapy with the high-dose amoxicillin/bismuth regimen. METHODS: A randomised clinical trial enrolled healthy individuals aged 40-64 years. H. pylori was assessed with a 13C-urea breath test. In total 579 H. pylori-positive subjects were randomly allocated in two groups: group 1: clarithromycin 500 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, esomeprazole 40 mg, all twice daily; group 2: bismuth subcitrate 240 mg twice daily, amoxicillin 1000 mg three times daily, esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily. Regimens were administered for 14 days.Information on treatment completion and adverse effects were collected via a telephone interview at 21-28 days after medication delivery. The efficacy was assessed by UBT 6 months after the treatment. RESULTS: We analysed 483 subjects for adverse effects (248 vs. 235 respectively). Furthermore, 316 subjects were analysed for efficacy. In per-protocol analysis, a higher efficacy was seen in group 1 (88.4 vs. 77.0%; P < 0.001); no difference was observed in compliance (90.3 and 91.2%). Therapy-related adverse effects were more common in group 1 (56.9 vs. 40.0%; P < 0.01). In intention-to-treat analysis no statistical difference in efficacy was revealed. CONCLUSIONS: Bismuth-based high-dose amoxicillin therapy showed a lower efficacy but was less frequently associated with adverse effects. Further research is required to examine the high-dose amoxicillin and bismuth-containing regimens in various populations to maximise eradication efficacy.

Administering esomeprazole subcutaneously via a syringe driver in the palliative demographic: A case series.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Proton pump inhibitors are potent suppressors of gastric acid secretion, and are commonly prescribed in palliative medicine. Despite multiple relevant indications in patients at the end-of-life, their use is often precluded as oral and intravenous administration is frequently inappropriate or not possible. Limited anecdotal evidence suggests proton pump inhibitors may be administered subcutaneously. Our objective was to investigate the tolerability and effectiveness of the administration of esomeprazole as a continuous subcutaneous infusion over 24 h via a syringe driver. METHODS: Case series (n = 7) design assessing sequential patients admitted to a specialist inpatient centre for palliative care, who required parenteral proton pump inhibitor therapy. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Four patients reported complete resolution of dyspeptic and reflux symptoms post commencement of esomeprazole. Two patients developed upper gastrointestinal bleeding, which via observation of vomitus and stools, resolved with the initiation of esomeprazole. A single patient, deemed high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, was commenced on esomeprazole and no bleeding events occurred. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Esomeprazole when administered via a syringe driver over 24 h appears well tolerated and effective for the symptomatic management of dyspepsia and treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding. Overall, this series adds to the limited evidence base for using subcutaneous proton pump inhibitors in the palliative demographic.

Effect of the Proton Pump Inhibitor Esomeprazole on the Systemic Exposure of Capecitabine: Results of A Randomized Crossover Trial.

Retrospective data suggest that gastric acid reduction by proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) impairs the dissolution and subsequent absorption of capecitabine, and thus potentially reduces the capecitabine exposure. Therefore, we examined prospectively the effect of esomeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of capecitabine. In this randomized crossover study, patients with cancer were assigned to 2 sequence groups, each consisting of 3 phases: capecitabine with esomeprazole administration 3 hours before (phase A), capecitabine alone (phase B), and capecitabine concomitant with cola and esomeprazole co-administration 3 hours before (phase C). The primary end point was the relative difference (RD) in exposure to capecitabine assessed by the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-inf ) and analyzed by a linear mixed effect model. Twenty-two evaluable patients were included in the analysis. After esomeprazole, there was a 18.9% increase in AUC0-inf of capecitabine (95% confidence interval (CI) -10.0% to 57.0%, P = 0.36). In addition, capecitabine half-life was significantly longer after esomeprazole (median 0.63 hours vs. 0.46 hours, P = 0.005). Concomitant cola did not completely reverse the effects observed after esomeprazole (RD 3.3% (95% CI -16.3 to 27.4%, P = 1.00). Capecitabine exposure is not negatively influenced by esomeprazole cotreatment. Therefore, altered capecitabine pharmacokinetics do not explain the assumed worse clinical outcome of PPI-cotreated patients with cancer.

Marked reduction in the number of white globe appearance lesions in the noncancerous stomach after exchanging vonoprazan for esomeprazole treatment: a follow-up case report.

Recently, an association has been suggested between development of white globe appearance lesions in the noncancerous stomach and treatment with a potassium-competitive acid blocker or a proton pump inhibitor. We previously reported two cases with development of white globe appearance lesions after vonoprazan treatment, suggesting a similar association. Here, we present the follow-up report of one of those two cases, concerning a 68-year-old woman who developed multiple white globe appearance lesions 1 year after starting vonoprazan treatment for severe gastroesophageal reflux disease leading to esophageal stricture. The patient refused to continue vonoprazan treatment after the lesions developed, and esomeprazole was initiated instead. Three months later, most of the white globe appearance lesions had disappeared, without worsening of her gastroesophageal reflux disease. Histologically, mucosal structural changes induced by vonoprazan, such as parietal cell protrusion with oxyntic gland dilatation, remained unchanged, whereas the gastric glands became less packed and a small calcification in the concentrated eosinophilic material was observed in a remaining white globe appearance cyst after esomeprazole treatment. Here, we discuss possible pathogenic mechanisms of these dramatic gastric mucosal changes observed in the present case, based on our endoscopic and histological findings.

Low-dose PPI to prevent bleeding after ESD: A multicenter randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Although proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used in the prevention of gastric bleeding caused by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), there is no consensus on the optimal regimen for these patients. Therefore, we aim to investigate whether intermittent use of low-dose PPI is sufficient to prevent post-ESD bleeding. METHODS: This multicenter, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial was conducted at 9 hospitals in China. Consecutive eligible patients with a diagnosis of gastric mucosal lesions after ESD treatment were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either intermittent low-dose or continuous high-dose PPIs treatment. After three days, all patients administered orally esomeprazole 40 mg once a day for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was post-ESD bleeding within 7 days. Analysis was done according to the intention-to-treat principle with the non-inferiority margin (Δ) of 5%. RESULTS: 526 consecutive patients were assessed for eligibility from 30 September 2017 to 30 July 2019, of whom 414 were randomly assigned to low-dose (n = 209) or high-dose (n = 205) esomeprazole treatment group without dropouts within7 days. The total post-ESD bleeding is occurred in 13 (6.2 %, 95 % CI 3.3-9.6) of 209 within 7 days in the intermittent low-dose group, and 12 (5.9 %, 95 % CI 2.9-9.3) of 205 in the continuous high-dose group. The absolute risk reduction (ARR) was 0.4 % (-4.2, 4.9). One month after ESD, There are 44 patients (21.1 %, 95 % CI 15.8, 26.8) and 39 patients (19.0 % 95 % CI 13.7, 24.4) in scar stage respectively in low-dose group and high-dose group (P = 0.875).The hospital costs in the low-dose PPI group was lower than high -dose group (P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The intermittent use of low-dose PPIs is sufficient to prevent post-ESD bleeding. It might be applied in clinical practice to prevent post-ESD bleeding and reduce the costs related to PPIs.

Efficacy of modified esomeprazole-amoxicillin dual therapies for Helicobacter pylori infection: an open-label, randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori resistance to amoxicillin was less than 5% in most countries. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-amoxicillin dual therapy dosing four times daily (q.i.d.) for 14 days could achieve an eradication rate of more than 85%. It is unclear whether dual therapy with shorter treatment duration or lower dosing frequency could also attain a satisfactory cure rate. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of two modified esomeprazole-amoxicillin dual therapies, 10-day q.i.d. and 14-day three times daily (t.i.d.) dual therapy, and investigate the factors that might affect the eradication rates. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A total of 253 patients were screened for eligibility and 208 patients were randomly assigned to 10-day dual therapy (esomeprazole 20 mg and amoxicillin 750 mg, all given four times daily) or 14-day dual therapy (esomeprazole 20 mg and amoxicillin 1000 mg, all given three times daily). RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, the eradication rates for 10-day and 14-day groups were 79.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 70.2-87.4%] and 83.5% (95% CI: 74.3-90.5%) as first-line therapies; and 80% (95% CI: 44.4-97.5%) and 76.9% (95% CI: 46.2-95.0%) as rescue therapies. The adverse event rates were 5.9% and 5.0% for 10-day and 14-day groups, respectively. Smoking and compliance significantly affected the efficacy of PPI-amoxicillin dual therapies. CONCLUSION: The eradication rate of 10-day q.i.d. dual therapy was unacceptable, while that of the 14-day t.i.d. dual therapy was borderline acceptable for first-line therapy. The two dual therapies were well tolerated with few adverse effects.

Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of ilaprazole infusion in healthy subjects and patients with esomeprazole as positive control.

AIMS: The objectives were to investigate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of ilaprazole infusion in healthy subjects and patients with esomeprazole as positive control, and then recommend the dosage regimen for Phase 2b/3 studies. METHODS: Three clinical studies were performed. First, 16 healthy subjects received infusion of ilaprazole 30 mg or esomeprazole 80 mg. Second, 12 healthy subjects received ilaprazole 20 mg followed by 10 mg once daily for 2 days. Finally, 20 patients with duodenal ulcers received ilaprazole 20 mg followed by 10 mg for 2 days or esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily for 3 days. Serial blood samples were collected and intragastric pH was recorded. RESULTS: The mean percentages time of intragastric pH >6 was 63.6 and 51.7% for healthy subjects after receiving ilaprazole 30 mg and esomeprazole 80 mg. Linear pharmacokinetics was observed when the dose was increased to 30 mg but the effect was saturated. Ilaprazole 20 mg followed by 10 mg for 2 days provided higher plasma exposure in healthy subjects than patients, but the effect was comparable. After multiple administrations, ilaprazole provided similar effect to esomeprazole. Ilaprazole infusion was safe and well tolerated without serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Ilaprazole provided comparable effect of pH control to esomeprazole, with lower dose and fewer times of administration. There was no significant difference of ilaprazole between healthy subjects and patients regarding intragastric acid inhibition. A loading dose of ilaprazole 20 mg followed by 10 mg once daily for 2 days was recommended for Phase 2b/3 studies.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of ilaprazole and esomeprazole both in initial treatment regimen and retreatment regimen of Helicobacter pylori infection in chronic gastritis.

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ilaprazole and esomeprazole both in initial treatment regimen and retreatment regimen of H. pylori infection in chronic gastritis and to explore risk factors for eradication failure. A total of 330 patients with chronic gastritis who were confirmed of H. pylori infection were enrolled in this study. 290 of them were initially treated patients and the 40 remained were patients with retreatment. Eradication assessment was performed at least four weeks after the completion of eradication therapy. Results showed that the eradication rates of the ilaprazole group and esomeprazole group were 91.4 % and 88.4 % for per-protocol (PP) analysis (p=0.41) and 89.0 % and 86.2 % for intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis (p=0.48) in initially treated patients. Meanwhile, they were 75.0 % and 72.2 % for PP analysis (p=0.85) and 75.0 % and 70.0 % for ITT analysis (p=0.72) in patients with retreatment. The differences were not statistically significant. There was also no significant difference in safety between the two drugs. A multiple logistic regression analysis showed that demographic factors such as age, gender, alcohol, smoking, coronary heart disease (CHD), hypertension (HTN) and diabetes mellitus (DM) did not affect eradication rates. However, patients with higher DOB values and patients with atrophic gastritis had significantly lower eradication rates than patients with lower DOB values and with non-atrophic gastritis whether the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) in eradication regimens was ilaprazole or esomeprazole. In conclusion, our findings suggest that the efficacy and safety of ilaprazole and esomeprazole were not significantly different both in initial treatment regimen and retreatment regimen of H. pylori infection in chronic gastritis and DOB values and type of chronic gastritis were to be independent risk factors for eradication failure. In addition, we discovered that a new quadruple regimen containing furazolidone and minocycline which achieved good efficacy and safety can be a promising option for retreatment of H. pylori infection.

Oral esomeprazole in Japanese pediatric patients with gastric acid-related disease: Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics.

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are widely used for the treatment of gastric acid-related disease, but they are not approved for use in children in Japan. To assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy (gastrointestinal symptom improvement) of PPI in Japanese pediatric patients with gastric acid-related disease, we conducted an 8 week, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter, phase I/III study of once-daily oral esomeprazole use. METHODS: Japanese children, aged 1-14 years with gastric acid-related disease, were stratified by weight and age into five groups (10 patients/group) to receive esomeprazole as granules for suspension (10 mg) or capsules (10 mg or 20 mg) once daily. RESULTS: Esomeprazole was absorbed and eliminated rapidly in all groups, with a median time to reach maximum plasma concentration of 1.47-1.75 h, an arithmetic mean terminal elimination half-life of 0.80-1.37 h, and a weight-correlated apparent total body clearance of 0.216-0.343 L/h/kg. Area under the plasma concentration-time curve during a dosage interval and maximum plasma drug concentration were generally higher in groups given a higher dose (20 mg) or with a lower age/weight, but also in patients identified as poor metabolizers on cytochrome P450 2C19 genotype. Most patients who had any upper gastrointestinal symptoms at baseline were asymptomatic at the end of the study. Thirty-three patients (66%) reported ≥1 adverse events, including three patients who reported serious adverse events not judged to be causally related to esomeprazole. CONCLUSIONS: Oral esomeprazole, at 10 mg or 20 mg once daily, had a similar safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic profile in Japanese pediatric patients to that previously seen in adults and Caucasian children.

Safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of DWP14012, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, in healthy male subjects.

BACKGROUND: A novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, DWP14012, is in clinical development as a potential alternative to proton pump inhibitors for the treatment of acid-related diseases. AIMS: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of DWP14012 in humans. METHODS: A randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo- and active-controlled, single- and multiple-ascending dose (SAD and MAD, respectively) study was conducted in healthy male subjects without Helicobacter pylori infection. Subjects randomly received a single oral dose of 10-320 mg DWP14012, esomeprazole (active comparator) or placebo in the SAD study (n = 72) and once daily doses of 20-160 mg DWP14012, esomeprazole or placebo for 7 days in the MAD study (n = 48; 8:2:2). Tolerability was evaluated using a microRNA-122 assay. Pharmacodynamics were evaluated through 24-hour gastric pH monitoring, and pharmacokinetics were evaluated plasma and urine DWP14012 concentrations. RESULTS: DWP14012 was generally well tolerated. The liver toxicity of DWP14012 was not higher than that of placebo after multiple oral administrations. DWP14012 showed rapid and sustained suppression of gastric acid secretion for 24 hours after dosing. Clear dose-response and exposure-response relationships were observed. Plasma concentrations of DWP14012 increased in a dose-proportional manner in the MAD study, whereas in the SAD study, DWP14012 did not significantly accumulate in the plasma. CONCLUSIONS: DWP14012 was well tolerated, and showed a rapid and long-lasting gastric acid suppression effect in healthy subjects. These results justify further investigation of DWP14012 in patients with acid-related disorders.

A randomized, double blind, controlled, multi center study of Ilaparazole in the treatment of reflux esophagitis-Phase III clinical trial.

AIM AND BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the main drugs for the treatment of reflux esophagitis. Phase II clinical trials showed that, compared with Esomeprazole, the new PPI Ilaparazole is great in terms of efficacy for reflux symptoms relief and curling for esophagitis. The aim of this study was to confirm suitable dose of Ilaparazole in the treatment of reflux esophagitis. METHODS: This study used a randomized, double-blind, parallel positive drug control, multi-center design. A total of 537patients diagnosed as reflux esophagitis by gastroscopy were randomly divided into Ilaparazole group (n = 322, Ilaparazole 10 mg QD) and esomeprazole group (n = 215, Esomeprazole 40 mg QD). The patients in the two groups were treated for 8 weeks. Heartburn and reflux symptoms prior to treatment, and 2, 4 and 8 weeks after the treatment were assessed. Gastroscopy was performed after 4 weeks of treatment. Unhealed patients within 4 weeks underwent gastroscopy again at the end of 8 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 471 cases completed the treatment. In Esomeprazole and Ilaparazole groups. After 8 weeks treatment, the healing rate in Esomeprazole group and Ilaparazole group were 82.79% (94.94%) and 83.54% (92.50%), respectively. The corresponding rate difference [Ilaparazole-esomeprazole] was 0.75% (-2.44%) and the two-sided 95% CI was -5.72 to 7.22 (-6.90 to 2.01). The symptom disappearance rates for FAS (PPS) were 75.81% (82.02%) and 76.71% (80.36%) P = 0.8223 (0.7742). Adverse reactions related to the drugs were: 10.70% and 11.80%, (P = 0.7817). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety of Ilaparazole (10 mg/day) in treating reflux esophagitis was similar to esomeprazole (40 mg/day). Ilaparazole (10 mg/day) can be used in the treatment of esophagitis. The clinical trial registration number of the study is NCT 02860624.

[Esomeprazol-induced cutaneous lupus erythematosus]. / Esomeprazol-induzierter kutaner Lupus erythematodes.

Proton pump inhibitors are among the most commonly used drugs worldwide. They are considered to be largely safe and cause little side-effects. We report a 69-year-old woman who suffered from erythematous plaques 2 months after initiating therapy with esomeprazole. The diagnosis of subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus was based on the clinical picture together with characteristic histological features of a skin biopsy specimen and the detection of anti-Ro/SSA antibodies. In particular, the temporal relationship with the onset of proton pump inhibitor therapy led to the high-level suspicion of a drug-induced pathogenesis. Strengthening the initially suspected diagnosis, the characteristic skin lesions resolved almost completely without specific therapy after discontinuation of the medication. If typical skin lesions occur in light-exposed areas in connection with the administration of PPI, the possibility of a drug-induced cutaneous lupus erythematosus should always be considered. Due to the frequent recurrence rate after renewed exposure, a new therapy with PPI should be avoided.

Endoscopic ultrasonography features of gastric mucosal cobblestone-like changes from a proton-pump inhibitor.

A 68-year-old man with no symptoms presented to Hokkaido University Hospital for esophagogastroduodenoscopy screening. He had a history of Helicobacter pylori eradication. Initial esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed no gastric cobblestone-like mucosa or gastric cracked mucosa. After 1 year, he received esomeprazole (20 mg) once daily for heartburn at another hospital. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed after 2 years of esomeprazole administration. Endoscopic findings showed that after H. pylori eradication, according to the Kyoto classification, gastric cobblestone-like mucosa presented in the gastric body area. Dilation of the oval crypt opening and intervening part in the gastric cobblestone-like mucosa was detected by endoscopy with narrow band imaging. Endoscopic ultrasonography revealed a thick gastric second layer and sporadic small a-echoic lesions in the low-echoic thickened second layer in the gastric cobblestone-like mucosa. The gastric cobblestone-like mucosa biopsy specimen showed parietal cell protrusions and oxyntic gland dilatations. Recently, we reported that gastric mucosal changes such as gastric cracked mucosa and gastric cobblestone-like mucosa were caused by proton-pump inhibitors; however, the gastric cobblestone-like mucosa was not examined by endoscopic ultrasonography. In this case, endoscopic ultrasonography findings suggested that oxyntic gland dilatations caused the elevated gastric mucosa, such as gastric cobblestone-like mucosa, from the use of proton-pump inhibitors.

Association Between Proton Pump Inhibitors and Microscopic Colitis.

OBJECTIVE: Microscopic colitis (MC) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the colon that is characterized by chronic, watery, nonbloody diarrhea. Concern regarding a potential association between proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) and MC has recently emerged. We sought to systematically review and summarize the evidence for the potential association between PPIs and MC. DATA SOURCES: We systematically searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and Google Scholar using the terms proton-pump inhibitors (omeprazole, lansoprazole, dexlansoprazole, rabeprazole, pantoprazole, or esomeprazole), microscopic colitis, collagenous colitis, and lymphocytic colitis. STUDY SELECTION: Full-text, English-language reports of case reports/series, observational studies, experimental studies, and systematic reviews/meta-analyses published between January 2000 to August 2016 were included. Bibliographies from pertinent publications were reviewed for additional references. Outcome was defined as the development of biopsy-confirmed MC. DATA EXTRACTION/SYNTHESIS: A total of 19 publications were identified: 5 case control studies and 14 case reports/series (encompassing a total of 32 cases). All studies were limited by small sample sizes. Risk of MC by dose or specific PPI agent was not investigated in any of the studies. A review of the current body of evidence reveals a possible association between PPIs and MC. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for large observational studies of high quality to examine the differential effect of specific PPIs and whether the magnitude of association is dose dependent. Given their widespread use, clinicians should routinely question whether patients are receiving unnecessary treatment with PPIs and discontinue therapy where appropriate.