Differences in the Ratios of General and Dental Specialists in Europe.

BACKGROUND: The European Economic Area (EEA) is composed of member states with a multitude of different regions. This study aimed to analyse the ratios of general dentists and dental specialists to the total population and the proportion of dental specialists to general dentists in 24 European countries and to explore specific intranational differences within 2 countries: France and Germany. METHODS: Available official documents and webpages from the United Kingdom and 23 of the 30 countries comprising the EEA were analysed. Data were expressed as absolute values, ratios of general dentists and dental specialists in the total of population, and percentages of dental specialists/dentists. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to clarify the main ratios that distinguish France from Germany, and cluster analysis was employed to determine similar areas. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between countries, with Ireland and Austria having the lowest ratio of dentists and Romania and Greece having the highest. The Czech Republic, the Netherlands, France, and Denmark had the lowest ratios of dental specialists to the total population. Lithuania, Sweden, and Germany had the highest number of dental specialists. Orthodontists were the most numerous specialists (5.0% of dentists), followed by oral surgeons (2.7%). In France, differences between departments were pronounced and associated with the presence of dental schools and per capita income. In Germany, only the correlation between per capita income and the density of oral surgeons was significant. CONCLUSIONS: Diverse ratios of general dentists and dental specialists to the total population and the proportion of dental specialists to general dentists were discovered within the examined countries, and their maximum values were 2.5, 5.7, and 4.1 times the minimum values, respectively. Differences were even found within the same country, as was the case in France and, to a lesser extent, in Germany.

Avaliação da retenção do conhecimento, do grau de confiança e dos erros de compreensão dos acadêmicos de odontologia / Evaluation of knowledge retention, degree of confidence and erros of undertanding of dental students

Objetivo: avaliar a retenção de conhecimento (RC), o grau de confiança (GC) e a identificação dos erros de aprendizado (EA) dos acadêmicos de um curso de Odontologia. Métodos: neste estudo, foram avaliados 39 alunos dos níveis finais de um curso de Odontologia, os quais responderam 40 questões retiradas de provas anteriores do Exame Nacional de Desempenho dos Estudantes (Enade), através de uma plataforma virtual. Es-tas foram divididas em quatro áreas: Formação Geral (FG); Saúde Coletiva (SC); Clínica Odontológica (CO); e Especialidade Odontológica (EO). Resultados: analisando os resultados, observou-se que a área do saber que obteve melhor média de acertos foi a de CO (com 59,4), seguida das questões de FG (com 48,5). A área que obteve menor média de acertos foi a de SC (com 36,4). O GC foi analisado através de um questionário em que o aluno relatava se estava ou não confiante perante a questão respondida. Em relação ao erro, percebeu--se que a única área na qual os alunos erraram as questões, mas estavam confiantes, foi a de SC. Em relação ao acerto, a única área em que os alunos acertaram as questões, mas não se demonstraram confiantes para acertar, foi a de FG.Conclusão: percebe-se que, dentre as áreas avaliadas, a SC foi a que apresentou pior média de acertos. (AU)

Objective: the present study evaluated the knowledge retention, degree of confidence and identification of learning errors of dental students. Methods: 39 senior dental students (last year) responded 40 questions from previous exam from the ENADE (National Student Performance Exam) using a virtual platform. Questions were divided into four areas: General Formation (GF); Collective Health (CH); Dental Clinic (DC) and Dental Specialty (DE). Results: it was observed that the area of knowledge that obtained the best average was DC, with 59.4, following by GF questions, with 48.5. The area with the lowest average was that of CH, with 36.4. The degree of confidence was analyzed through a questionnaire, where the student reported whether or not she/he was confident about the answers. Regarding the error, it was noticed that the only area where the students answered the questions but were confident was that of CH. Regarding the hit, the only area where students got the questions right but were not confident to get it right was that of GF. Conclusion: among the evaluated areas, CH was the one with the worst average of correct answers.(AU)

Investigation of Turkish dentists clinical attitudes and behaviors towards the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey study

Abstract Currently, the whole world is under the threat of the COVID-19 pandemic, and dentists are at high risk. The aim of this study was to investigate what kind of precautions Turkish dentists take in dental clinics during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study population consisted of dentists in Turkey. An online questionnaire (23 questions-57 items) was sent to a sample of Turkish dentists from March 16 to March 20, 2020. The questionnaire comprised a series of questions about dentists' demographic characteristics, their concerns, and the measures taken in dental clinics against COVID-19. This study included a total of 1,958 Turkish dentists. A total of 1,274 (65.1%) were general dentists, and 684 (34.9%) were specialists. Five hundred twenty-two (26.7%) dentists attended an informational meeting on COVID-19. Of these dentists, 69.8% were aware of COVID-19 according to their self-assessed knowledge scores. More than 90% of the dentists were concerned about themselves and their families. Only 12% of the dentists wore an N95 mask. Although Turkish dentists took some precautionary measures, they did not take enough precautions to protect themselves, the dental staff, and other patients from COVID-19. As the number of COVID-19 cases increased, the measures taken slightly increased in dental clinics as well. Dentists are strongly recommended to take maximum precautions in the clinical setting. The guidelines about the COVID-19 pandemic should be sent to all dentists by the regional and national dental associations.

Analysis of the supply of specialized oral health care services in the Brazilian National Health System: Brazil, 2014. / Análise da oferta de serviços na atenção especializada em saúde bucal no Sistema Único de Saúde, Brasil, 2014.

OBJECTIVE: to analyze the availability of public specialized dental care services at Dental Specialties Centers (CEO) in Brazil in 2014. METHODS: secondary data on the CEO ratio and dental surgeon ratio were analyzed by population as well as the adequacy of the quantity of complete dental consulting rooms per CEO type, the adequacy of the ratio between the working hours of dental auxiliaries /technicians and those of dental surgeons and the adequacy of the availability of recommended minimum specialties. Possible statistical differences between macro-regions were verified. RESULTS: we found a ratio of one CEO per 217,797 inhabitants and one dental surgeon per 26,811 inhabitants; 97% of CEOs had the recommended number of dental consulting rooms; 26% had equivalent working hours between dental auxiliaries /technicians and dental surgeons; 60% offered the recommended minimum specialties. CONCLUSION: there were limitations in the provision of National Health System specialized oral health care services as well as regional differences.

Produção especializada no SUS em capitais brasileiras com centros de especialidades odontológicas: uma análise descritiva / Specialized production in the unified health system in Brazilian capitals with dental specialty centers: a descriptive analysis

Centros de especialidades odontológicos (CEOs) são estabelecimentos de saúde de âmbito especializado que devem realizar uma quantidade mínima de procedimentos. Objetivos: descrever a produção odontológica especializada e reportar o cumprimento das metas nas capitais brasileiras com CEOs. Materiais e método: foi conduzido um estudo do tipo longitudinal retrospectivo, sendo realizada uma busca por CEOs cadastrados no Cadastro Nacional de Estabelecimentos de Saúde (CNES). A produção odontológica foi pesquisada no Sistema de Informações Ambulatoriais do Sistema Único de Saúde (SIASUS), de maio de 2015 a abril de 2016. Resultados: foram encontrados e considerados elegíveis para o presente estudo 59 CEOs, localizados em 19 capitais brasileiras e no Distrito Federal, sendo 48% CEOs tipo II. Cerca de 730 mil procedimentos especializados foram realizados durante os 12 meses avaliados. Uma taxa de 86% das metas foi cumprida, sendo que cirurgia foi à área com maior cumprimento (92%), seguida de periodontia (89%) e endodontia (76%). Uma das capitais apresentou apenas 33% das metas cumpridas. Três capitais não atingiram nenhuma das metas estabelecidas em procedimentos de endodontia. Conclusão: foi observada uma grande variação no cumprimento das metas entre as capitais com CEOs. Enquanto algumas capitais apresentaram elevado cumprimento das metas, outras exibiram dados preocupantes, principalmente nos procedimentos de endodontia. (AU)

Dental Specialty Centers (Centros de Especialidades Odontológicas ­ CEOs) are specialized health facilities that should perform a minimum number of procedures. Objectives: this study aimed to describe the specialized dental production and report the achievement of goals in Brazilian capitals with CEOs. Materials and method: a retrospective longitudinal study was performed with a search for the CEOs listed in the National Registry of Health Establishments. The dental production was searched in the Outpatient Information System of the Brazilian Unified Health System for the period from May 2015 to April 2016. Results: fifty-nine CEOs were found and considered eligible for the present study. They were located in 19 Brazilian capitals and in the Federal District, whereas 48% were CEOs Type II. Approximately 730 thousand specialized procedures were performed during the 12 months evaluated. A rate of 86% of goals was met and surgery presented the highest achievement (92%), followed by periodontics (89%) and endodontics (76%). One of the capitals achieved only 33% of the goals. Three capitals did not achieve any of the goals set for endodontic procedures. Conclusion: there was a great variation in the achievement of goals among capitals with CEOs. While some capitals showed high achievement of goals, others presented concerning data, especially for endodontic procedures. (AU)

Long-term Evaluation of Treatment Planning Decisions for Nonhealing Endodontic Cases by Different Groups of Practitioners.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate changes in treatment planning decisions among different practitioner groups over 7 years for teeth with apical periodontitis and a history of endodontic treatment. METHODS: A Web-based survey was sent to dentists in Pennsylvania in 2009 consisting of 14 cases with nonhealing periapical lesions and intact restorations without evidence of recurrent caries. Participants selected among 5 treatment options: wait and observe, nonsurgical retreatment (NSRTX), surgical retreatment (SRTX), extraction and fixed partial denture, or extraction and implant (EXIMP). In 2016, the identical survey was resent to the original 2009 participants. RESULTS: In 2009, 262 dentists participated in the survey. Two hundred one participants were general practitioners (GPs: 76.7%), 26 endodontists (ENDOs: 9.9%), and 35 other specialists (prosthodontics, periodontics, and oral surgery [SPECs]: 13.4%) (n = 262). EXIMP, NSRTX, and SRTX were fairly equally selected but with great variation between practitioner groups (χ2 = 173.49, P < .05). A subset group of 104 participants (SUB) (39.7% of the original participants) retook the survey in 2016 (69 GPs [66.3%], 15 ENDOs [14.0%], and 20 SPECs [19.7%]). Comparisons among practitioner groups were significantly different in SUB (n = 104) for 2009 (χ2 = 95.536, P < .05) and 2016 (χ2 = 109.8889, P < .05). Intragroup reliability between 2009 and 2016 revealed no significant differences between the overall treatment planning choices for all practitioners (GPs, ENDOs, or SPECs). Intrapractitioner reliability showed many treatment planning decision changes on an individual level. Chances that individuals changed their original decision were 47.8% (95% confidence interval, 45.2%-50.4%) and were significantly different among the 3 practitioner groups (GPs > SPECs > ENDOs [χ2 = 11.2792, P < .05]). No significant changes were observed in the decision for tooth saving versus replacement treatment options (P = .520). CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were noted between current and past treatment planning decisions in regard to tooth preservation by endodontic retreatment versus tooth extraction and replacement. However, individual practitioners lacked consistency in their decision making over time.

Implementation of dental specialty centers: a descriptive analysis of the current status in the Brazilian territory

ABSTRACT This study aimed to assess the current implementation status of Dental Specialty Centers (Centros de Especialidades Odontológicas - CEO) in Brazil. The sample included CEOs implemented up to November 2015 in the 27 Brazilian federative units. Data were obtained directly from the database of the Informatics Department of the Brazilian Unified Health System, according to the National Registry of Health Facilities (NRHF) of Dental Specialty Centers of all Brazilian regions. Primary care data were also collected from the cities with implemented CEOs, including coverage status of the Family Health Strategy (FHS) and number of Oral Health Teams (OHT) I and II, at 2 collection periods (January 2006 and November 2015). There were 1019 CEOs implemented in Brazil, which were unequally distributed among the Brazilian states, with prevalence of implementation of CEOs type II (n=503, 49.4%). The statistical analysis showed significant difference between the three types of CEO (I, II, and III) and the variables of coverage rate (FHS) and number of teams (OHT I, OHT II) at both data collection periods. Although presenting an evolutionary aspect in the implementation of CEOs, the implementation of medium-complexity care in Brazil is disorganized.

Implementation of dental specialty centers: a descriptive analysis of the current status in the Brazilian territory.

This study aimed to assess the current implementation status of Dental Specialty Centers (Centros de Especialidades Odontológicas - CEO) in Brazil. The sample included CEOs implemented up to November 2015 in the 27 Brazilian federative units. Data were obtained directly from the database of the Informatics Department of the Brazilian Unified Health System, according to the National Registry of Health Facilities (NRHF) of Dental Specialty Centers of all Brazilian regions. Primary care data were also collected from the cities with implemented CEOs, including coverage status of the Family Health Strategy (FHS) and number of Oral Health Teams (OHT) I and II, at 2 collection periods (January 2006 and November 2015). There were 1019 CEOs implemented in Brazil, which were unequally distributed among the Brazilian states, with prevalence of implementation of CEOs type II (n=503, 49.4%). The statistical analysis showed significant difference between the three types of CEO (I, II, and III) and the variables of coverage rate (FHS) and number of teams (OHT I, OHT II) at both data collection periods. Although presenting an evolutionary aspect in the implementation of CEOs, the implementation of medium-complexity care in Brazil is disorganized.

Current Status of Postdoctoral and Graduate Programs in Dentistry.

Advanced dental education has evolved in the context of societal needs and economic trends to its current status. Graduate programs have positioned their role in the context of health systems and health science education trends in hospitals, interprofessional clinical care teams, and dental schools and oral health care systems. Graduate dental education has been a critical factor in developing teams in trauma care, craniofacial disorders, pediatric and adult medicine, and oncology. The misalignment of the mission of graduate dental programs and the demands of private practice has posed a challenge in the evolution of programs as educational programs have been directed towards tertiary and indigent care while the practice community focuses on largely healthy affluent patients for complex clinical interventions. Those seeking graduate dental education today are smaller in number and include more international dental graduates than in the past. Graduate dental education in general dentistry and in the nine recognized dental specialties now includes Commission on Dental Accreditation (CODA) recognition of training standards as part of its accreditation process and a CODA accreditation process for areas of clinical education not recognized as specialties by the American Dental Association. Current types of programs include fellowship training for students in recognized specialties. This article was written as part of the project "Advancing Dental Education in the 21st Century."

[Evaluating productivity targets achievement in Dental Specialty Centers from Maranhão State, Brazil, 2011]. / Avaliação do cumprimento das metas de produtividade em Centros de Especialidades Odontológicas no Maranhão, 2011.

OBJECTIVE: to evaluate productivity targets achievement (PTA) in Dental Specialty Centers (DSCs) from Maranhão State, Brazil. METHODS: this was an ecologic study using secondary data; an indicator for PTA was created for each subgroup of procedures. RESULTS: 25 DSCs were evaluated; the PTA was higher for basic procedures (n=19), followed by endodontics (n=11), oral surgery (n=9) and periodontics (n=8); the best results were obtained at DSCs type II; higher PTA was associated with financial anticipation (basic procedures) and higher Human Development Index, life expectancy and social exclusion rate (endodontics); lower PTA was associated with larger population (endodontics/oral surgery), adherence to the Pact for Health (periodontics/endodontics), larger number of specialties (periodontics) and bigger DSC (oral surgery). CONCLUSION: most DSCs did not achieve productivity targets, except for basic procedures; socioeconomic and health management characteristics of the municipalities were associated with the PTA; the DSCs characteristics explained little about the PTA.

Civil liability: characterization of the demand for lawsuits against dentists.

In light of the fact that dentists may be held civilly liable for their practice, it is important to understand the current situation of lawsuits filed against these professionals by studying current legal decisions and the literature. The objective of this study was to analyze the case law of the Court of Justice of São Paulo, Brazil, relative to the profile of patients and professionals, the most commonly involved specialties, the amounts litigated and the court decisions pertaining to civil liability lawsuits against dentists. In an inductive approach, a single researcher screened and collected civil liability rulings by accessing the Court's website, and following a statistical-descriptive procedure and an indirect observation technique. The most frequently involved specialty was prosthodontics. However, oral and maxillofacial surgery was related to a higher incidence of damages awarded to settle claims and to higher damage amounts. The dentist was found guilty in 44.32% of the cases researched. Pecuniary damages ranged between R$ 485.50 and R$ 12,530.00, and non-pecuniary damages ranged between R$ 2,500.00 and R$ 70,000.00. Most lawsuits were filed by women against male dentists. An increase in the relative number of lawsuits against companies versus individuals was observed.

[Reimbursement of public dental care in Germany, the United Kingdom, Hungary and Poland]. / A fogászati ellátás finanszírozása Németországban, az Egyesült Királyságban, Magyarországon és Lengyelországban.

INTRODUCTION: Dental treatments have the highest rate among medical interventions and their reimbursement is also significant. AIM: The aim of the study was to compare the outcome of the reformed healthcare system process on public dental services in four European countries. METHOD: Assessment base for the comparison of reimbursement of dental treatments and dental fee schedules provided by the health insurance funds were used. The following indicators were examined: the ratio of public dental services and the main oral health indicators. Among dental fee schedules, reimbursement of general dental activity, prevention, operative dentistry, endodontic and oral surgery were selected. RESULTS: The lowest value of population to active dentist ratio was found in Germany (population to active dentist ratio: 1247) and the highest in Hungary (population to active dentist ratio: 2020). Oral health indicators showed significant differences between the West-European and East-European countries. On the other hand, the ratio of completely edentulous people at the age of 65yrs did not show great variations. Reimbursement of public dental treatments indicated significantly higher value in Germany and the United Kingdom compared to the other countries. CONCLUSIONS: Reimbursement of public dental services varies considerably in the selected European countries.

Civil liability: characterization of the demand for lawsuits against dentists

Abstract In light of the fact that dentists may be held civilly liable for their practice, it is important to understand the current situation of lawsuits filed against these professionals by studying current legal decisions and the literature. The objective of this study was to analyze the case law of the Court of Justice of São Paulo, Brazil, relative to the profile of patients and professionals, the most commonly involved specialties, the amounts litigated and the court decisions pertaining to civil liability lawsuits against dentists. In an inductive approach, a single researcher screened and collected civil liability rulings by accessing the Court's website, and following a statistical-descriptive procedure and an indirect observation technique. The most frequently involved specialty was prosthodontics. However, oral and maxillofacial surgery was related to a higher incidence of damages awarded to settle claims and to higher damage amounts. The dentist was found guilty in 44.32% of the cases researched. Pecuniary damages ranged between R$ 485.50 and R$ 12,530.00, and non-pecuniary damages ranged between R$ 2,500.00 and R$ 70,000.00. Most lawsuits were filed by women against male dentists. An increase in the relative number of lawsuits against companies versus individuals was observed.

Provision of specific dental procedures by general dentists in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network: questionnaire findings.

BACKGROUND: Objectives were to: (1) determine whether and how often general dentists (GDs) provide specific dental procedures; and (2) test the hypothesis that provision is associated with key dentist, practice, and patient characteristics. METHODS: GDs (n = 2,367) in the United States National Dental Practice-Based Research Network completed an Enrollment Questionnaire that included: (1) dentist; (2) practice; and (3) patient characteristics, and how commonly they provide each of 10 dental procedures. We determined how commonly procedures were provided and tested the hypothesis that provision was substantively related to the three sets of characteristics. RESULTS: Two procedure categories were classified as "uncommon" (orthodontics, periodontal surgery), three were "common" (molar endodontics; implants; non-surgical periodontics), and five were "very common" (restorative; esthetic procedures; extractions; removable prosthetics; non-molar endodontics). Dentist, practice, and patient characteristics were substantively related to procedure provision; several characteristics seemed to have pervasive effects, such as dentist gender, training after dental school, full-time/part-time status, private practice vs. institutional practice, presence of a specialist in the same practice, and insurance status of patients. CONCLUSIONS: As a group, GDs provide a comprehensive range of procedures. However, provision by individual dentists is substantively related to certain dentist, practice, and patient characteristics. A large number and broad range of factors seem to influence which procedures GDs provide. This may have implications for how GDs respond to the ever-changing landscape of dental care utilization, patient population demography, scope of practice, delivery models and GDs' evolving role in primary care.

Estudo da atual utilização da TCFC pelos Cirurgiões-Dentistas nas diversas especialidades / Study of current use of Cone-Beam CT by dental surgeons in the various specialties

Objetivo: Determinar, dentre os profissionais de Odontologia, o grau de formação e informação quanto ao uso da tomografia computadorizada tipo cone-beam, assim como quantificar e discriminar o uso desta ferramenta diagnóstica no cotidiano das especialidades. Materiais e métodos: Profissionais cursando algum tipo de especialização tiveram que responder a um questionário de respostas certo/errado, que continha parâmetros sobre as indicações do uso da tomografia computadorizada na Odontologia, assim como perguntas que permitiram o levantamento de informações acerca desta ferramenta diagnóstica no tocante a influência do custo do procedimento, necessidade de treinamento específico para interpretação e necessidade de investimento por parte do profissional clínico. Resultados: Pudemos observar que a indicação da técnica não está totalmente esclarecida para muitos Cirurgiões-Dentistas. A porcentagem de desconhecimento foi significativa (27%), por se tratar de radiação ionizante, que pode causar riscos estocásticos e deletérios. Pudemos observar em nossos resultados que existe um embasamento geral da técnica, pois à medida que especialistas de uma certa área acertaram questões correspondentes a outras especialidades, notamos a ocorrência de equívocos de conceitos quando eram questionados sobre o protocolo de uso em sua própria área de conhecimento. Conclusão: A divulgação dos dados obtidos será de grande valia para o clínico geral, bem como para os especialistas, no intuito de reduzir a dose de exposição desnecessária quando da indicação da técnica. A necessidade de aprimorar o conhecimento será sempre necessária, para que não tenhamos apenas o conhecimento geral, mas o específico para a área de atuação de cada um.

Objective: To determine, among dental professionals, the degree of training and information regarding the use of CBCT, as well as to quantify and discriminate the use of this diagnostic tool in specialties daily basis. Materials and methods: Professionals attending specialization courses had to answer a right/wrong answers questionnaire containing parameters of indications for the use of computed tomography in dentistry. Beyond that, they had to answer questions that allowed the collection of information about this diagnostic tool regarding the influence of the cost of the procedure, the need for specific training in the interpretation and need for investment by the clinical professional. Results: We observed that the technique is not entirely clear for many dentists. The percentage of unawareness was significant (27%) considering it is about an ionizing radiation, which can cause deleterious and stochastic risks. We observed in our results that there is a general grounding of the technique, because on the one hand experts of a determined area showed a certain knowledge of other specialties, on the other hand we verified there were misunderstandings of concepts when questioned about the protocol used in their own area of knowledge. Conclusion: The release of the data obtained will be of great value to the general practitioner as well as to specialists in order to reduce the amount of unnecessary exposure in the indication of the technique. Improve knowledge will always be necessary so we will not only have general knowledge, but the specific one to the area of each dentistry professional.

High and specialty-related musculoskeletal disorders afflict dental professionals even since early training years.

OBJECTIVE: To determine how early musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) develop in dental professionals and to explore the potential differences among distinct dental specialties. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 271 dental postgraduates majoring in five dental specialties were recruited, i.e., orthodontics, prosthodontics, endodontics, periodontics and alveolar surgery. 254 age-matched non-dental postgraduates served as the control. The standardized Nordic questionnaire on MSDs and a self-report questionnaire regarding correlative factors (only for dental postgraduates) were answered through emails. Reliability of responses was assessed applying test-retest method. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient of participants' answers ranged from 0.89 to 0.96. Dental postgraduates had significantly higher prevalence of MSDs than the control group, especially at neck, upper back and lower back. In all dental specialties included, high prevalence of MSDs was reported at neck (47.5%-69.8%), shoulders (50.8%-65.1%), lower back (27.1%-51.2%) and upper back (25.6%-46.5%), with lower prevalence at elbows (5.1%-18.6%), hips (3.4%-16.3%) and ankles (5.1%-11.6%). Periodontics students reported the worst MSDs in most body regions except wrists and knees, which were more prevalent for prosthodontic and alveolar surgery students, respectively. Furthermore, year of clinical work, clinical hours per week and desk hours per week were found as risk factors for MSDs, whereas physical exercise and rest between patients as protective factors. CONCLUSIONS: High and specialty-related MSDs afflict dental professionals even since very early stage of careers. Prevention aimed at the specialty-related characteristics and the risk/protective factors revealed in this study should be introduced to dental personnel as early as possible.

High and specialty-related musculoskeletal disorders afflict dental professionals even since early training years

OBJECTIVE: To determine how early musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) develop in dental professionals and to explore the potential differences among distinct dental specialties. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 271 dental postgraduates majoring in five dental specialties were recruited, i.e., orthodontics, prosthodontics, endodontics, periodontics and alveolar surgery. 254 age-matched non-dental postgraduates served as the control. The standardized Nordic questionnaire on MSDs and a self-report questionnaire regarding correlative factors (only for dental postgraduates) were answered through emails. Reliability of responses was assessed applying test-retest method. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient of participants' answers ranged from 0.89 to 0.96. Dental postgraduates had significantly higher prevalence of MSDs than the control group, especially at neck, upper back and lower back. In all dental specialties included, high prevalence of MSDs was reported at neck (47.5%-69.8%), shoulders (50.8%-65.1%), lower back (27.1%-51.2%) and upper back (25.6%-46.5%), with lower prevalence at elbows (5.1%-18.6%), hips (3.4%-16.3%) and ankles (5.1%-11.6%). Periodontics students reported the worst MSDs in most body regions except wrists and knees, which were more prevalent for prosthodontic and alveolar surgery students, respectively. Furthermore, year of clinical work, clinical hours per week and desk hours per week were found as risk factors for MSDs, whereas physical exercise and rest between patients as protective factors. CONCLUSIONS: High and specialty-related MSDs afflict dental professionals even since very early stage of careers. Prevention aimed at the specialty-related characteristics and the risk/protective factors revealed in this study should be introduced to dental personnel as early as possible. .

A five-year evaluation of an NHS dental practice-based specialist minor oral surgery service.

OBJECTIVE: To report the findings of an evaluation of an NHS dental practice-based minor oral surgery service. BASIC RESEARCH DESIGN: Service evaluation. CLINICAL SETTING: NHS specialist practice in England. PARTICIPANTS: Patients and referring practitioners. INTERVENTIONS: analysis of activity, patient and referring practitioner satisfaction data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Numbers and case-mix treated; non-attendance; antibiotic prescribing; complication rates; patients and referring practitioner satisfaction. RESULTS: 5,796 treatment appointments were arranged, with a median waiting time from receipt of referral to treatment of 35 days. Treatment provided included: surgical removal of third molars and non-third molars, surgical endodontics and other surgical and oral medicine cases (28.3%, 53.3%, 3.5%, and 15.0% of cases, respectively). Antibiotics were prescribed at 13.1% of all treatment appointments and 2.5% required appointments for post-operativecomplications. All but one patient reported overall satisfaction and over 98% strongly agreed/agreed with positive attitudinal statements about the oral surgeon's communication/information giving, technical competence and understanding/acceptance. 70.1% of patients were seen on time and under 1% were seen more than 15 minutes late. Some 83.1% felt the standard of service was better than expected from a hospital and none felt it was worse. More than 85% of referring practitioners agreed that: waiting times were shorter than at the hospital; urgent problems were seen quickly; and, the referral process was easy and understandable. Over 98% either strongly agreed or agreed that they were happy with the service provided. CONCLUSIONS: A range of minor oral surgery procedures can be provided with low complication rates, short waiting times, acceptable accessibility and high levels of patient and referring practitioner satisfaction from a specialist NHS dental practice-based service.

[Distribution of patients' complaints presented to the law court of the Israel Dental Association according to themes, dental area profession and the results].

The purpose of this study was to review the distribution of patients' complains presented to the law court of the Israel Dental Association in Tel Aviv district, according to their topics, dental areas and results. 260 complaint cases filed between 2000 and July 2008 were reviewed. only 186 cases, to which an arbitration proceeding conducted full appeal only, were taken into account . Dentists, who encountered many complaints, were classified according to their country of graduation, as specialists or general dentists. The complaints were classified according to their specific dental field, year of complaint, to the number of arbitrations each year, to the number of appeals each year, to the entity who submitted the appeal, to the difference between the verdict in the District compared to the national ruling, to the distribution of complaints by gender and to the frequency of complaints by anonymous doctors. The distribution of complaints in accordance with topics was as follows: 30% in oral rehabilitation 13.5% in Dental prosthesis, 12.4% in implants, in endodontics 5.3%, 3.7% in maxillofacial surgery, 3.2% on ethics, 2.7% in orthodontics, 1.1% in periodontology 0.5 % in pedodontics and 28% in combined dental domains. 92.5% of complaints filed against dentists who were not experts. 7.5% of the complaints were filed against s specialists. Specialists in the field of oral rehabilitation encountered the largest number of complaints, i.c. 30%. Approximately 35.2% of complaints filed against dentists who have completed their studies in Eastern European countries and 24.9% against the Israeli graduates. 63% of referrals to the Court from Tel Aviv district for which a full arbitration procedure / appeals were presented by women whereas only 37% were presented by men. An analysis of the findings in the difference between the verdicts in the District compared to the national ruling it showed a tendency to aggravation of punishment. (P = 0.003) The Greatest number of appeals was filed in 2001, mostly by patients. In 2004, the greatest number of appeals were filed mostly by dentists. Most appeals have been filed over the years by patients. Against a small number of doctors several complaints were filed. The majority of complaints that were filed in a specific period against one doctor was 6.

Trends and attitudes regarding head and neck oncologic surgery: a survey of United States oral and maxillofacial surgery programs.

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to: 1) estimate the prevalence and trends of American oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) programs in recruiting head and neck oncologic surgery (HNOS) -trained faculty, performing HNOS oncologic procedures and microvascular reconstruction, and presenting HNOS research at academic meetings; 2) estimate whether HNOS and microvascular reconstruction involvement varies among programs with or without a program director or chair trained in HNOS; 3) estimate whether HNOS involvement varies among those OMS programs that regularly attend and do not attend tumor board; 4) estimate whether HNOS involvement varies among those programs that have and have not presented HNOS research at an academic meeting; 5) estimate whether HNOS involvement varies among doctor of medicine-integrated and 4-year OMS programs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Investigators developed and distributed a survey to all US OMS program directors and/or chair composed of questions regarding faculty prevalence and recruitment, frequency and trends in cases, and the priority of applicants for residency with regard to HNOS. There were 18 close-ended questions, and one open-ended question. Responses were recorded in categorical, Likert, ordinal, and numerical format. Bivariate associations were calculated using Fisher exact test and logistic regression. RESULTS: Sixty-three of 101 surveys were returned (62.3%). Ten program directors or chair completed a fellowship in HNOS (15.9%). Programs with an HNOS-trained program director or chair were more likely to have another HNOS-trained faculty member (P = .01), performed more malignant tumor resections (P < .001), neck dissections (P < .001), and microvascular free-flap reconstructions (P = .02) than programs without program directors or chair trained in HNOS. Programs that regularly attended tumor board performed an increasing number of malignant tumor resections (P = .008); and neck dissections (P = .003) than programs that did not regularly attend their institution's tumor board. Presentations of HNOS-related research at national meetings did not differ between doctor of medicine-integrated and 4-year OMS programs (P = .7). There was no difference in the prevalence of HNOS-trained program directors and chair between doctor of medicine-integrated and 4-year programs (P = .7). CONCLUSIONS: This study's data and comments suggest that programs involved in HNOS have a strong involvement in expanded scope OMS and related academic activities.