RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lumbar spondylolysis is a bone defect in the pars interarticularis of the lumbar vertebral, which is a common cause of low back pain in youth. Although non-surgical treatment is a mainstream option, surgery is necessary for patients with persistent symptoms. Buck technique is widely used as a classical direct repair technique, but it cannot achieve reduction of low-grade spondylolisthesis and reconstruction of lumbosacral sagittal balance. We have described a novel surgical procedure based on Buck technique with temporary intersegmental pedicle screw fixation, and report a series of clinical outcomes in 5 patients to provide a reference for the clinical treatment of young lumbar spondylolysis. METHODS: Five young patients with symptomatic lumbar spondylolysis with a mean age of 19.20 ± 5.41 years underwent surgical treatment after an average of 7.60 ± 1.52 months of failure to respond to conservative treatment, using a new surgical procedure based on Buck technique combined with temporary intersegmental pedicle screw fixation. RESULTS: Five patients were successfully operated without serious complications such as nerve and vascular injury. The average operation time was 109.00 ± 7.42 min, the interpretative average blood loss was 148.00 ± 31.14 ml, and the average fusion time was 11.20 ± 1.64 months. All patients were followed up for 2 years after surgery, and the visual analogue score (VAS) of low back pain and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were significantly improved compared with those before surgery, and the Henderson's evaluation were rated excellent or good. After the removal of the internal fixation, it was observed that temporary intersegmental fixation could repair the isthmus, reduce lumbar spondylolisthesis, and reconstruct the sagittal balance of the lumbosacral vertebrae while preserving lumbar motion and preventing intervertebral disc degeneration. Postoperative MRI indicated the Pfirrmann classification of the affected discs: 1 case from grade III to grade II, 3 cases from grade II to grade I, and 1 case remained grade II. CONCLUSIONS: Buck technique supplemented by temporary intersegmental pedicle screw fixation is a highly applicable and effective method for the treatment of adolescent lumbar spondylolysis. The isthmic fusion is accurate, and temporary intersegmental fixation can effectively prevent disc degeneration and reconstruct the sagittal balance of lumbosacral vertebra.
Assuntos
Vértebras Lombares , Parafusos Pediculares , Espondilólise , Humanos , Espondilólise/cirurgia , Espondilólise/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Adolescente , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Resultado do Tratamento , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Fusão Vertebral/instrumentação , Seguimentos , Dor Lombar/cirurgia , Dor Lombar/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND Cervical spondylolysis with spondylolisthesis is a rare disorder. According to previous reports, the spondylolisthesis is usually Meyerding Grade I, with only a limited number of cases receiving surgical treatment. We hereby report a special case of cervical spondylolysis with Grade-II spondylolisthesis, treated with single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), and present a literature review related to this problem. CASE REPORT Here, we report the case of a 52-year-old man who complained of posterior neck pain and numbness of the bilateral upper limbs. Radiological examination showed bilateral spondylolysis of the C6 and Meyerding Grade-II spondylolisthesis of C6 on C7 with instability. The patient underwent a single-level C6/C7 ACDF surgery. The symptoms of neck pain and bilateral upper-limb numbness were relieved immediately after surgery. The immediate postoperative radiological examination showed successful restoration of sagittal alignment. At 3-month follow-up, the patient had returned to normal life without any symptoms. At 2-year follow-up, computed tomography showed that C6-C7 fusion had been achieved and alignment was maintained. CONCLUSIONS Cervical spondylolysis, as an uncommon spinal disorder, has been regarded as a congenital abnormity, and has unique radiological characteristics. For most of the cases with cervical spondylolysis, even with Grade-II spondylolisthesis, single-level ACDF can achieve good clinical and radiological outcomes.
Assuntos
Vértebras Cervicais , Discotomia , Fusão Vertebral , Espondilolistese , Espondilólise , Humanos , Masculino , Espondilolistese/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Discotomia/métodos , Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Vértebras Cervicais/diagnóstico por imagem , Espondilólise/cirurgiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the anatomical parameters of the ideal screw trajectory for percutaneous intralaminar screw fixation of a pars defect in lumbar spondylolysis using computed tomography scans. METHODS: Using advanced radiological software, the ideal intralaminar screw trajectory was determined. The anatomical parameters of this trajectory were analyzed using a total of 80 single-level lumbar tomography scans in patients with spondylolysis at the lumbar 4 vertebrae and lumbar 5 vertebrae levels. The ideal intralaminar screw trajectory started from the inferolateral edge of the lamina and was between the intralaminar region, pars defect, and defective pars neck and pedicle. Along this trajectory, the skin-lamina distance, intralaminar screw length, isthmic lamina length and width, defective pars neck width, lateral entry distance of the screw to the center of the spinous process, and sagittal and coronal screw application angles were analyzed. RESULTS: When comparing the lumbar 4 vertebrae and lumbar 5 vertebrae parameters, the mean skin-to-lamina distances were 11-9 cm (P = 0.000), intralaminar screw lengths 3.5-3.6 cm (P = 0.067), isthmic lamina lengths 2-2 cm (P = 0.698), mid-lamina widths 1-1 cm (P = 0.941), defective pars neck widths 1-1 cm (P = 0.674), screw lateral entry distances according to the spinous process 1-1.5 cm (P = 0.000), sagittal screw angles 45°-45° (P = 0.870), and coronal screw angles 10°-20° (P = 0.000), respectively. There were no differences based on age and gender (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous intralaminar rigid screw fixation of a pars defect in spondylolysis provides minimally invasive, low-profile instrumentation. In spondylolysis, a screw length of 3-4 cm and a screw diameter of 4-5 mm may be sufficient for pars fixation with intralaminar screws.
Assuntos
Parafusos Ósseos , Vértebras Lombares , Espondilólise , Humanos , Espondilólise/cirurgia , Espondilólise/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Masculino , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Adulto Jovem , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Fusão Vertebral/instrumentação , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pedicle screw and lamina hook (PSLH) technique is an effective and popular method for direct pars repair of lumbar spondylolysis. There is a lack of studies to explore factors that may influence the healing of spondylolysis after direct pars repair surgery. The present study aimed to investigate the factors associated with non-fusion after direct pars repair of lumbar spondylolysis with PSLH technique. METHODS: A total of 55 subjects (average age 21.1 ± 6.3 years, a total of 120 pars defects) diagnosed with symptomatic spondylolysis and underwent pars repair surgery with PSLH were followed up and their clinical data were analyzed. Subjects were divided into a non-fusion group and fusion group according to whether the pars defect had bony fusion at last follow-up assessed by CT. Radiographic data, data related to spondylolysis and clinical outcomes were collected and compared between groups. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time of the 55 patients was 24.8 ± 12.0 (12-64) months. Among the 120 pars defects, 101 defects were successfully fused and 19 were not fused according to CT. The fusion rate was 84.2%. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed the factors correlated with non-fusion after pars repair surgery: whether the spondylolysis segment was associated with spina bifida occulta (SBO) (P = 0.001), stage of the defect (P = 0.047), width of the defect (P = 0.002), and disc degeneration (P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Direct pars repair by PSHL is a reliable treatment for lumbar spondylolysis with a fusion rate of 84.2%. Association with SBO of the spondylolysis segment, a terminal stage of the defect, a wider defect gap, and grade III disc degeneration may be factors associated with non-fusion after direct pars repair of lumbar spondylolysis with PLSH. Non-fusion patients after pars repair appear to have worse clinical results compared to fusion patients.
Assuntos
Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral , Parafusos Pediculares , Fusão Vertebral , Espondilólise , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Espondilólise/diagnóstico por imagem , Espondilólise/cirurgia , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lumbar spondylolysis involves a bony defect in the vertebral pars interarticularis, predominantly affecting the lower lumbar spine. This condition is a significant etiological factor in lumbar instability and recurrent lower back pain, particularly in young individuals. While conservative treatments are the primary intervention, they often fail to provide relief, necessitating surgical approaches. Notwithstanding, executing bone grafting and fixation in the pars interarticularis defect simultaneously through minimally invasive surgery remains challenging. METHOD: This study elucidates the biportal endoscopic spinal surgery (BESS) technique, innovatively applied for bone graft repair and percutaneous cannulated screw fixation in a patient with lumbar spondylolysis. We offer a detailed walkthrough of the technical procedures supplemented with follow-up radiographic evidence. RESULTS: The BESS technique facilitated meticulous clearance of the defect site, coupled with bone grafting and cannulated screw fixation, effectively addressing lumbar spondylolysis through a minimally invasive approach. This method holds promise for achieving substantial osseous fusion at the vertebral pars interarticularis defect site. CONCLUSION: The BESS procedure for lumbar spondylolysis ensures a clean and prepared defect site for grafting and encourages successful osseous fusion, spotlighting its potential as a viable surgical strategy in managing this condition.
Assuntos
Fusão Vertebral , Espondilólise , Humanos , Transplante Ósseo/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Espondilólise/diagnóstico por imagem , Espondilólise/cirurgia , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Parafusos Ósseos , Fusão Vertebral/métodosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of a new direct lysis repair technique using internal fixation with rod, screws, and Songer cable in symptomatic lumbar spondylolysis. METHODS: Between December 2015 and January 2020, patients who were diagnosed with symptomatic lumbar spondylolysis and surgically treated with a rod-screw-cable system were recruited. Pedicle screwing by the Magerl technique was performed in all included patients, followed by direct lysis repair with bone allograft and demineralized bone matrix by stabilizing the posterior lamina and spinous process using a rod-screw-cable system. Clinical outcome was measured using the visual analog scale and Oswestry disability index preoperatively and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were included in this study-11 men and 5 women (mean age: 47 years; range, 26-67 years). The lytic defects were at L4 and L5 in 6 and 10 patients, respectively. The mean follow-up period was 41 months (24-62 months). The visual analog scale values were 7.3, 6.1, 4.3, 3.3, 2.1, and 1.9 preoperatively and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively, respectively. The Oswestry disability index values were 59.8%, 55.4%, 41.7%, 32.4%, 21.1%, and 16.9% for the same periods, respectively. No patient had an increase in the slip after surgery. There were no significant complications such as implant failure. CONCLUSIONS: Our technique provides rigid intra-segmental repair of spondylolysis without intersegmental motion interference, even if the patient is older or has disc degeneration.
Assuntos
Fusão Vertebral , Espondilólise , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fixadores Internos , Parafusos Ósseos , Resultado do Tratamento , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Espondilólise/diagnóstico por imagem , Espondilólise/cirurgia , Espondilólise/complicaçõesRESUMO
Lumbar spondylolysis is one of the most common causes of low back pain and primarily affects children and adolescents. Traditional posterior lumbar fixation and interbody fusion surgery has always been the most effective method to treat spondylolysis. However, traditional surgical management has limitations of large trauma, complex operation, high cost, postoperative biomechanical deterioration, and resulting complications. In order to avoid the trauma and complications of surgical treatment, and reduce the cost of treatment. Based on the successful clinical experience of using staphylococcal enterotoxin C (SEC) to treat nonunion after a limb fracture, we identified a minimally invasive method to effectively treat lumbar spondylolysis. A novel minimally invasive therapeutic approach is presented herein of an SEC injection guided by C-arm fluoroscopy to treat lumbar spondylolysis. We describe a novel technique applied in a patient with lumbar spondylolysis, who showed significantly improved low back pain symptoms and a computed tomography scan, including osseous fusion of the bilateral isthmus at L4 after SEC therapy. This is the first reported case description of using an SEC injection to treat lumbar spondylolysis with a successful clinical outcome.
Assuntos
Dor Lombar , Fusão Vertebral , Espondilólise , Criança , Humanos , Adolescente , Dor Lombar/etiologia , Dor Lombar/complicações , Resultado do Tratamento , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Espondilólise/cirurgiaRESUMO
The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical effect of direct isthmus repair via Wiltse approach and classical approach in the treatment of simple lumbar spondylolysis in young patients. Thirty-three patients with simple lumbar spondylolysis underwent direct isthmic repair via the Wiltse approach (n = 17) or the classical approach (n = 16). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, hospital stay, fusion rate, visual analogue scale (VAS), and the Oswestry disability index were evaluated and compared between the 2 groups. The amount of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, and the duration of hospital stay in the Wiltse group were lower than those in the classical group (P < .05). There was no significant difference in Oswestry disability index score between the Wiltse group and the classical group at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after operation, but the visual analogue scale score in the Wiltse group was lower than that in the classical group at 6 months after surgery (P < .05). The Wiltse approach was comparable to the classical approach in terms of bone graft fusion time and fusion rate. The Wiltse approach for isthmus repair can achieve the same or even better clinical effect than the classical approach, and the Wiltse approach is more minimally invasive. Pedicle screw-hook internal fixation system combined with autogenous iliac bone graft via Wiltse approach is a feasible, safe, and effective minimally invasive surgical method for the repair of isthmic spondylolysis in young patients.
Assuntos
Parafusos Pediculares , Espondilólise , Humanos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Artrodese , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Espondilólise/cirurgia , Hemorragia Pós-OperatóriaRESUMO
Minimally invasive repair of pars defects can be achieved via means of cannulation followed by tubular decortication. Given these injuries typically occur in pediatric and adolescent patients, minimal disruption to surrounding tissue during the repair is ideal. The use of an endoscopic approach to assist with repair and fusion across the pars defect is a novel consideration in the pediatric demographic, and in this case report we highlight our experience and rationale for this in treating a 14-year-old male athlete with lumbar 5 pars fracture. Radiographic evidence of bony fusion was seen by the third postoperative month. In this case report we demonstrate the invasive nature of this repair can be minimized further than current convention with successful radiographic and clinical outcomes.
Assuntos
Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral , Fusão Vertebral , Espondilólise , Masculino , Humanos , Adolescente , Criança , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Espondilólise/cirurgia , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Endoscopia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Although direct isthmic repair, such as PSVPH, did not affect the mobility of the fixed segment and adjacent segment, it has a relatively low rate of isthmic fusion compared with conventional fusion. The Isobar TTL dynamic internal fixation system has been widely used in clinical practice and has achieved satisfactory clinical results. However, the use of the Isobar TTL system in combination with direct isthmic repair for lumbar spondylolysis has rarely been reported. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes between patients who underwent Isobar TTL system and PSVPH with direct repair of defect for lumbar spondylolysis. METHODS: Stepwise propensity score matching (PSM) for age and sex were performed to keep comparable clinical data between groups in this retrospective and matched-pair case control study. A total of 50 patients diagnosed with lumbar spondylolysis underwent surgical implantation of the Isobar TTL group (n = 25) or PSVPH group (n = 25) from June 2009 to June 2016. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Oswestry disability index (ODI), and visual analog score (VAS). Radiographic evaluations included range of motion (ROM) and the disc heights of stabilized segment and adjacent segment, adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) and bony fusion. Three-dimensional reconstruction of lumbar CT scan was obtained to evaluate bone fusion of the isthmic at final follow-up. The independent Student's t test and chi-square test were applied to compare the differences between groups. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients from TTL group were matched to 25 patients in PSVPH group for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), defect side, spondylolisthesis meyerding, and follow-up duration. The intervertebral space height (IH) of stabilized segment at postoperative 1 week and final follow-up in the TTL group was higher than those in the PSVPH group, respectively (P = 0.030; P = 0.013). The ROM of stabilized segment at final follow-up in the TTL group was significantly lower than that in the PSVPH group (P < 0.001). The bony fusion rate at the final follow-up was 88.0% (22/25 cages) in the TTL group and 80.0% (20/25 cages) in the PSVPH group. The ODI score at final follow-up in the TTL group was significantly lower than that in the PSVPH group (P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Overall, our data suggest that the Isobar TTL system outcomes are comparable to those in the PSVPH, with a similar high bony fusion rate as PSVPH, especially its wider indications as a new surgery.
Assuntos
Parafusos Pediculares , Fusão Vertebral , Espondilólise , Humanos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transplante Ósseo , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Espondilólise/diagnóstico por imagem , Espondilólise/cirurgiaRESUMO
The smiley-face rod method has been reported to be a successful technique for reducing slippage and repairing pars defects in lumbar spondylolisthesis. However, we encountered a patient who developed right L5 radiculopathy with muscle weakness after use of the smiley-face rod method. The patient was a 19-year-old female judo player who had undergone direct repair surgery using the smiley-face rod method for terminal-stage lumbar spondylolysis. Postoperatively, she developed paresthesia on the lateral side of the right thigh with weakness of the right tibialis anterior and extensor hallucis longus. Computed tomography showed right foraminal stenosis at L5 with the floating lamina shifted ventrally and apophyseal ring fracture. In this case, the spondylolysis fracture angle differed between the left and right sides, with the fracture line on the right side running more sagittally. As a result, the floating lamina was shifted ventrally on the right side by compression and the right L5 intervertebral foraminal space was narrowed due to the ventral shift in the floating lamina and the apophyseal ring bone fragment. The shape of the fracture line should be examined carefully before surgery to avoid this technical pitfall. J. Med. Invest. 69 : 308-311, August, 2022.
Assuntos
Radiculopatia , Espondilolistese , Espondilólise , Adulto , Descompressão , Feminino , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Espondilolistese/cirurgia , Espondilólise/cirurgia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
¼: Spondylolysis is defined as a defect of the pars interarticularis, and spondylolisthesis is defined as a slippage of a vertebra relative to the immediately caudal vertebra. ¼: Most cases of spondylolysis and low-grade spondylolisthesis can be treated nonoperatively. Depending on a patient's age, nonoperative treatment may include a thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO), physical therapy, and activity modification. Bracing and physical therapy have been found to be more effective than activity modification alone. ¼: Patients with dysplastic spondylolisthesis are at higher risk for progression and should be monitored with serial radiographs every 6 to 9 months. ¼: Operative management is recommended for symptomatic patients with failure of at least 6 months of nonoperative management or patients with high-grade spondylolisthesis. ¼: Surgical techniques include pars defect repair, reduction, and fusion, which may include posterior-only, anterior-only, or circumferential fusion.
Assuntos
Espondilolistese , Espondilólise , Braquetes , Criança , Humanos , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Radiografia , Espondilolistese/diagnóstico por imagem , Espondilolistese/cirurgia , Espondilólise/diagnóstico por imagem , Espondilólise/cirurgiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to report the clinical outcomes associated with the percutaneous intralaminar screw repair performed for pars defects in adults. METHODS: Adult patients who got their lumbar L5 spondylolysis repaired via modified Buck's procedure between 2017 and 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. The preoperative and postoperative clinical outcomes at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were evaluated for patients with and without fusion using the visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and the Short-Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36). At 12 months, the fusion status of all the patients was assessed using bilateral direct X-rays. RESULTS: Thirty patients with spondylolysis were identified (11 men and 19 women). All patients had bilateral L5 pars defects, and at 12 months, the fusion rate was 60% (18/30). There was no difference between the fusion and nonfusion groups in terms of their visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and SF-36 physical component summary and SF-36 mental component summary scores (P > 0.05). Within-group comparisons of the 2 groups revealed significant changes at follow-up (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive repair of lumbar spondylolysis with percutaneous intralaminar screw fixation restores the motion segment and can provide early resumption of physical activity with minimal muscle damage, smaller skin incision, and less soft tissue dissection.
Assuntos
Fusão Vertebral , Espondilólise , Adulto , Parafusos Ósseos , Feminino , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Lombares/fisiologia , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Espondilólise/complicações , Espondilólise/diagnóstico por imagem , Espondilólise/cirurgia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Lumbar spondylolysis occurs in 5%-8% of adults. This study aimed to report clinical and radiographic outcomes of direct pars repair in adults with lumbar spondylolysis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients treated for lumbar spondylolysis via open fracture reduction and direct pars repair with cannulated screws using a lag technique. Demographics, clinical presentation, perioperative and intraoperative imaging, and postoperative data were collected. We subsequently performed a systematic review to describe radiographic and clinical outcomes following direct pars repair. RESULTS: Three patients were identified (mean age 40.3 years; range, 21-72 years; 2 male). All patients had bilateral L5 pars fractures treated via open, direct repair with cannulated screws. There were no intraoperative complications. Length of stay was <24 hours for each patient. All patients reported back/radicular symptom relief and returned to full-time manual labor by latest follow-up. Noncontrast lumbar computed tomography performed 14-20 months postoperatively confirmed that all patients had good bilateral screw placement without fracture. Two patients (21 and 28 years old at surgery) had evidence of fusion across fracture sites, while 1 patient exhibited radiolucency around the screws and no progression of spondylolisthesis. Additionally, we reviewed 8210 articles and included 15 in a systematic review of direct pars repair. Fusion rates were 67%-100%, with improved average Oswestry Disability Index and visual analog scale back pain scores by latest follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar spondylolysis treatment with open fracture reduction and direct pars repair with cannulated screws in adults is safe and may result in mechanical back/radicular pain relief, even in the absence of radiographic fusion.
Assuntos
Fusão Vertebral , Espondilolistese , Espondilólise , Adulto , Parafusos Ósseos , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Região Lombossacral , Masculino , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Espondilolistese/cirurgia , Espondilólise/diagnóstico por imagem , Espondilólise/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients who do not respond to conservative treatment of the isthmus are often treated with surgery. We used direct repair plus intersegment pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of lumbar spondylolysis. The aim of this observational study was to assess the effects of this technique and evaluate various risk factors potentially predicting the probability of disc and facet joint degeneration after instrumentation. METHODS: The study included 54 male L5 spondylolysis patients who underwent pars repair and intersegment fixation using pedicle screws. Bony union was evaluated using reconstruction images of computed tomography. Radiographic changes, including disc height, vertebral slip, facet joint and disc degeneration in the grade of adjacent and fixed segments, were determined from before to final follow-up. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with the incidence of disc and facet joint degeneration. RESULTS: Bony union was achieved in all cases. Logistic regression analysis revealed that instrumentation durations of greater than 15.5 months and 21.0 months were significant risk factors for the incidence of L4/5 and L5S1 facet degeneration, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Intersegmental pedicle screw fixation provides good surgical outcomes and good isthmic bony union rates in patients with lumbar spondylolysis. The duration of fixation was confirmed as a risk factor for facet joint degeneration. Once bony union is achieved, instrument removal should be recommended.
Assuntos
Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral , Parafusos Pediculares , Fusão Vertebral , Espondilólise , Articulação Zigapofisária , Análise Fatorial , Feminino , Humanos , Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral/etiologia , Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral/cirurgia , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Masculino , Parafusos Pediculares/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Espondilólise/diagnóstico por imagem , Espondilólise/etiologia , Espondilólise/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Articulação Zigapofisária/diagnóstico por imagem , Articulação Zigapofisária/cirurgiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and practicality of pedicle screw fixation via the Quadrant retractor and Buck's technique in the treatment of adolescent spondylolysis. METHODS: A total of 31 patients who underwent pedicle screw fixation or Buck's technique at our hospital from 2012 to 2017 were selected for this retrospective study. The patients were divided into a pedicle screw group (16 patients) and a Buck's technique group (15 patients) according to surgical procedure. Age, sex, disease duration, involved segments, preoperative Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for low back pain (LBP), intraoperative blood loss, incision length, operative time and length of hospital stay were documented. ODI scores, VAS scores for LBP and fusion rates at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year and 3 years postoperatively were used to evaluate surgical outcomes. RESULTS: The average follow-up period was 32.75 ± 11.99 months in the pedicle screw group and 31.02 ± 9.64 months in the Buck's technique group. No significant differences in demographic data and perioperative data were found between the two groups (P > 0.05). The ODI scores and VAS scores for LBP in both groups were significantly improved at 3 years postoperatively compared with the values before surgery (ODI%: 45.74 ± 2.47 vs 10.99 ± 3.00; 45.29 ± 6.94 vs 15.73 ± 6.89. VAS: 5.94 ± 0.68 vs 1.50 ± 0.52; 6.13 ± 0.74 vs 2.13 ± 0.92, P < 0.05). The ODI scores of the patients in the pedicle screw group at 1 month to 3 years postoperatively were lower than those of the patients in the Buck's technique group (P < 0.05). Moreover, the VAS scores for LBP of the patients in the pedicle screw group at 6 months and 3 years postoperatively were lower than those of the patients in the Buck's technique group (P < 0.05). No significant difference in the VAS scores for LBP was found between the two groups at 1 month postoperatively (3.88 ± 0.50 vs 4.20 ± 0.56, P = 0.10). Three years postoperatively, good fusion of the pars interarticularis was achieved in all patients in the pedicle screw group, but four patients in the Buck's technique group did not achieve good fusion (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Both pedicle screw fixation and Buck's technique can achieve good outcomes in the treatment of adolescent spondylolysis. Pedicle screw fixation via the Quadrant retractor for the treatment of spondylolysis is associated with more satisfactory effects in terms of LBP relief and fusion results.
Assuntos
Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Parafusos Pediculares , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Espondilólise/cirurgia , Adolescente , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medição da Dor , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fusão Vertebral/instrumentaçãoRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in pars repair of lumbar spondylolysis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: BMP-2 is a growth factor that plays a role in the formation of bone and promotes bone healing. However, few studies of using rhBMP-2 in pars repair have been reported. METHODS: Direct pars repair and pedicle screw fixation was performed, which were added with 1 mg of rhBMP-2 and iliac crest bone graft in the study group (rhBMP-2 group, n=32) and iliac crest bone graft alone in the autograft group (n=36). Patients completed the visual analog scale and the Oswestry Disability Index preoperation, 3, 6, and 12 months after the operation. Computed tomography scans with axial and sagittal reconstructions were performed at 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Baseline demographic data showed no significant difference between 2 groups. There were significant differences for the Oswestry Disability Index score at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, which were higher in the autograft group. There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to the overall union status. As for union speed, the trabecular bone appeared earlier and union rates were higher in rhBMP-2 group than in the autograft group at 9, and 12 months postoperatively. No complications were identified in either group. One case in the rhBMP-2 group and 2 cases in the autograft group underwent revision surgery. CONCLUSION: Compared with iliac crest bone graft alone, the use of rhBMP-2 can accelerate fusion in pars repair for young patients with spondylolysis. The union rates were significantly different at 9 and 12 months after surgery. This study showed no clinical difference when adding rhBMP-2 compared with iliac crest bone graft alone.
Assuntos
Fusão Vertebral , Espondilólise , Proteína Morfogenética Óssea 2/farmacologia , Proteína Morfogenética Óssea 2/uso terapêutico , Proteínas Morfogenéticas Ósseas/farmacologia , Transplante Ósseo/métodos , Humanos , Ílio/transplante , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Proteínas Recombinantes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Espondilólise/diagnóstico por imagem , Espondilólise/cirurgia , Fator de Crescimento Transformador beta , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, single-center, observational study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and the characteristics of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients with concomitant lumbar spondylolysis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The prevalence and features of lumbar spondylolysis in patients with AIS are unclear. METHODS: We included 357 patients with AIS who underwent correction and fusion surgery. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) images were used to assess the existence of lumbar spondylolysis. Cobb angles of the curves, parameters of spinal alignment, Lenke classification, and the presence of low back pain were compared between patients with and without spondylolysis. RESULTS: Of the patients included in the study, 6.1% had lumbar spondylolysis. They had significantly greater lumbar lordosis (LL) and sacral slope (SS) than those without lumbar spondylolysis. Logistic regression analyses and receiver-operating characteristic curves showed that LL was a significant risk factor (odds ratio: 1.059; 95% confidence interval: 1.018-1.103; Pâ=â0.005) of associating lumbar spondylolysis with a cut off value of 56.5 degrees (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.689; sensitivityâ=â63.6%, specificityâ=â71.0%). CONCLUSION: We should be vigilant for lumbar spondylolysis in AIS patients whose LL and SS are large, especially with LL larger than 56.5°.Level of Evidence: 3.
Assuntos
Lordose , Escoliose , Fusão Vertebral , Espondilólise , Adolescente , Humanos , Lordose/diagnóstico por imagem , Lordose/epidemiologia , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Escoliose/diagnóstico por imagem , Escoliose/epidemiologia , Escoliose/cirurgia , Espondilólise/diagnóstico por imagem , Espondilólise/epidemiologia , Espondilólise/cirurgia , Vértebras TorácicasRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The demand for treating degenerative lumbar spinal disease has been increasing, leading to increased utilization of medical resources. Thus, we need to understand how the budget of insurance is currently used. The objective of the present study is to overview the utilization of the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) by providing the direct insured cost between patients receiving surgery and patients receiving nonsurgical treatment for degenerative lumbar disease. METHODS: The NHIS-National Sample Cohort was utilized to select patients with lumbar disc herniation, spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis or spondylolysis. A matched cohort study design was used to show direct medical costs of surgery (n = 2,698) and nonsurgical (n = 2,698) cohorts. Non-surgical treatment included medication, physiotherapy, injection, and chiropractic. The monthly costs of the surgery cohort and nonsurgical cohort were presented at initial treatment, posttreatment 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and yearly thereafter for 10 years. RESULTS: The characteristics and matching factors were well-balanced between the matched cohorts. Overall, surgery cohort spent $50.84/patient/month, while the nonsurgical cohort spent $29.34/patient/month (p<0.01). Initially, surgery treatment led to more charge to NHIS ($2,762) than nonsurgical treatment ($180.4) (p<0.01). Compared with the non-surgical cohort, the surgery cohort charged $33/month more for the first 3 months, charged less at 12 months, and charged approximately the same over the course of 10 years. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment initially led to more government reimbursement than nonsurgical treatment, but the charges during follow-up period were not different. The results of the present study should be interpreted in light of the costs of medical services, indirect costs, societal cost, quality of life and societal willingness to pay in each country. The monetary figures are implied to be actual economic costs but those in the reimbursement system instead reflect reimbursement charges from the government.
Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral/economia , Estenose Espinal/economia , Espondilolistese/economia , Espondilólise/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Analgesia/economia , Analgesia/estatística & dados numéricos , Terapia por Exercício/economia , Terapia por Exercício/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral/cirurgia , Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral/terapia , Região Lombossacral/patologia , Masculino , Manipulação Quiroprática/economia , Manipulação Quiroprática/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/economia , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estenose Espinal/cirurgia , Estenose Espinal/terapia , Espondilolistese/cirurgia , Espondilolistese/terapia , Espondilólise/cirurgia , Espondilólise/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Conservative methods are the traditional options in the management of lumber spondylolysis whereas surgery is indicated for symptomatic patients not responding to medical treatment and cases with a multilevel pars defect. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the clinical, functional, and radiologic results of using bone graft and fixation with pedicular screw-rod-laminar hook construct in treatment of lumber spondylolysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 2017 and January 2020, 20 patients with symptomatic lumbar spondylolysis not responding to conservative treatment for more than 6 months were treated by defect reconstruction fixation using bone block autografting and pedicular screw laminar hook construct. The mean follow-up time was 12.5 ± 03.5 months. All patients were examined pre- and postoperatively and followed up clinically (pain [visual analog scale]), functionally (Oswestry Disability Index, Modified Prolo Functional Economic Scales, and Macnab criteria), and radiologically (pars defect healing). Perioperative outcomes and complications were documented. RESULTS: Clinical, radiologic, and functional outcomes were significantly improved. Bony union was evident in all patients (100%). Blood loss, operative time, and hospital stay increased in cases with a multilevel pars defect and cases with associated injuries. Two cases reported complications in this study as misplaced pedicular screw and superficial wound infection. CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction fixation of pars defect using this construct is an effective, feasible procedure in the treatment of Lumbar spondylolysis regarding the preservation of lumbar motion and avoidance of adjacent-segment problems after fusion.