Direct Repair of Symptomatic Lumbar Spondylolysis Using Rod-Screw-Cable System.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of a new direct lysis repair technique using internal fixation with rod, screws, and Songer cable in symptomatic lumbar spondylolysis. METHODS: Between December 2015 and January 2020, patients who were diagnosed with symptomatic lumbar spondylolysis and surgically treated with a rod-screw-cable system were recruited. Pedicle screwing by the Magerl technique was performed in all included patients, followed by direct lysis repair with bone allograft and demineralized bone matrix by stabilizing the posterior lamina and spinous process using a rod-screw-cable system. Clinical outcome was measured using the visual analog scale and Oswestry disability index preoperatively and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were included in this study-11 men and 5 women (mean age: 47 years; range, 26-67 years). The lytic defects were at L4 and L5 in 6 and 10 patients, respectively. The mean follow-up period was 41 months (24-62 months). The visual analog scale values were 7.3, 6.1, 4.3, 3.3, 2.1, and 1.9 preoperatively and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively, respectively. The Oswestry disability index values were 59.8%, 55.4%, 41.7%, 32.4%, 21.1%, and 16.9% for the same periods, respectively. No patient had an increase in the slip after surgery. There were no significant complications such as implant failure. CONCLUSIONS: Our technique provides rigid intra-segmental repair of spondylolysis without intersegmental motion interference, even if the patient is older or has disc degeneration.

Main and contralateral side stages of lesion affected bone union in the conservative treatment of adolescent lumbar spondylolysis: a multivariable analysis of 217 patients and 298 lesions in a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Factors affecting bone union in the conservative treatment of adolescent lumbar spondylolysis remain controversial. We aimed to examine these factors along with advances in diagnostic imaging using multivariable analysis of a sufficient number of patients and lesions. METHODS: In this retrospective study, high-school-aged patients or younger (n = 514) who were diagnosed with lumbar spondylolysis from 2014 to 2021 were investigated. We included patients with acute fractures who showed signal changes around the pedicle on magnetic resonance imaging and who completed conservative treatment. The following factors were investigated at the initial visit: age, sex, level of lesion, main side stage, presence and stage of contralateral side lesion, and presence of spina bifida occulta. The association of each factor with bone union was evaluated through a multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Altogether, 298 lesions in 217 patients (174 boys and 43 girls; mean age: 14.3 years) were included in this study. Multivariable logistic regression analysis of all factors showed that the main side progressive stage was more likely associated with nonunion as compared to the pre-lysis (OR: 5.86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.00-18.8; p = 0.0011) and early stages (OR: 3.77; 95% CI: 1.72-8.46; p = 0.0009). Regarding the contralateral side stage, the terminal stage was more likely to be associated with nonunion. CONCLUSION: In the conservative treatment of lumbar spondylolysis, the factors affecting bone union were the main and contralateral side stages. Sex, age, level of lesion, or spina bifida occulta had no significant effects on bone union. The main, progressive, and contralateral side terminal stages were negative predictors of bone union. Trial registration This study was retrospectively registered.

Clinical Results of Restoration of Pars Interarticularis Defect in Adults with Percutaneous Intralaminar Screw Fixation.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to report the clinical outcomes associated with the percutaneous intralaminar screw repair performed for pars defects in adults. METHODS: Adult patients who got their lumbar L5 spondylolysis repaired via modified Buck's procedure between 2017 and 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. The preoperative and postoperative clinical outcomes at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were evaluated for patients with and without fusion using the visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and the Short-Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36). At 12 months, the fusion status of all the patients was assessed using bilateral direct X-rays. RESULTS: Thirty patients with spondylolysis were identified (11 men and 19 women). All patients had bilateral L5 pars defects, and at 12 months, the fusion rate was 60% (18/30). There was no difference between the fusion and nonfusion groups in terms of their visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and SF-36 physical component summary and SF-36 mental component summary scores (P > 0.05). Within-group comparisons of the 2 groups revealed significant changes at follow-up (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive repair of lumbar spondylolysis with percutaneous intralaminar screw fixation restores the motion segment and can provide early resumption of physical activity with minimal muscle damage, smaller skin incision, and less soft tissue dissection.

Large Lumbar Lordosis and Coronal Deformity Angular Ratio Are Risk Factors for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis in Patients With Lumbar Spondylolysis.

BACKGROUND: The features of lumbar curves in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis (LS) are unclear. The aim of this retrospective study was to present the clinical and radiologic characteristics of scoliosis due to LS and LS concurrent with main thoracolumbar/lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). METHODS: This study was conducted as a single-center retrospective comparative study on 56 pediatric spondylolisthesis patients with main thoracolumbar/lumbar curves. Cases were divided into 2 groups according to the course of scoliosis after spinal surgery of LS. Sagittal spinopelvic parameters and scoliotic characteristics were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The prevalence of scoliosis was 15.3% in pediatric LS patients in our study population. Lumbar lordosis (LL), Cobb angle, apical rotation, and coronal deformity angular ratio (C-DAR) were higher in the LS concurrent with AIS group than in the LS with functional scoliosis group (P < 0.05), while curve span, apical vertebral translation, and central sacral vertical line to C7 plumb line were lower (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analyses and receiver operating characteristic curves showed that LL and C-DAR were significant risk factors of unresolved lumbar curves after spinal surgery for LS, with a cutoff value of 51.5°and 3.5, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar scoliosis may develop due to LS, or a concurrent condition to LS. LL and C-DAR are the features that differentiate AIS from functional scoliosis in patients with LS.

Association of spinal anomalies with spondylolysis and spina bifida occulta.

PURPOSE: To investigate the association of spinal anomalies with lumbar spondylolysis and spina bifida occulta (SBO). METHODS: A total of 1190 patients with thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic computed tomography scans available were categorized according to the number of presacral (thoracic and lumbar) mobile vertebrae and the presence or absence of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV). The prevalence of spondylolysis and SBO and the association of spinal anomalies with these disorders were evaluated. RESULTS: Normal morphology (17 mobile vertebra with no LSTV) was found in 607 men (86.5%) and 419 women (85.9%) and about 14% of patients had anomalies. Spondylolysis was found in 74 patients (6.2%), comprising 54 men (7.7%) and 20 women (4.1%). SBO involving the lumbar spine was found in 9 men (1.3%) and 2 women (0.4%). Spondylolysis was significantly more common in men with 18 vertebrae without LSTV (21.1%) than in those with 17 vertebrae without LSTV (7.2%) (p = 0.002). The prevalence of spinal anomalies was 55.6% in men and 50.0% in women with SBO that included a lumbar level was significantly higher than in both men (13.5%, p < 0.001) and women (4.8%, p = 0.003) without SBO. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that there is a relationship between spinal anomalies and both spondylolysis and SBO, which may lead to elucidation of the mechanism of onset of spondylolysis and improve its treatment and prognosis. Awareness that patients with SBO involving the lumbar spine have an increased likelihood of a spinal anomaly may help to prevent level errors during spinal surgery.

Symptomatic Unilateral Pediculolysis Associated with Contralateral Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis in Adults-Case Report and Review of Literature.

BACKGROUND: The term "pediculolysis" encompasses rare, chronic pedicular changes characterized by pedicle hypertrophy, sclerosis, and pseudoarthrosis, which develop secondary to recurrent microfractures from repeated stress injuries. These stress injuries to pedicles can be insufficiency fractures, commonly reported in elderly patients with associated osteoporosis, or fatigue fractures, which occur in young adolescents involved in heavy sports. These pedicular lesions have been reported in association with defects in other components of the neural arch, including the pars interarticularis and lamina. CASE DESCRIPTION: We have described a rare case of grade 1 spondylolisthesis with left-sided pediculolysis and contralateral pars lysis in a middle-age female patient without associated osteoporosis or comorbidities. She underwent L5-S1 transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion after initial conservative measures had failed. However, her symptoms persisted even after the surgery and necessitated revision surgery, including left L5 medial pediculectomy, neurolysis of the left L5 nerve root, and extension of instrumentation to L4 bilaterally and L4-L5 posterolateral fusion. CONCLUSION: We have reported the present case to bring awareness to spine surgeons regarding the existence of this rare entity even in middle-age individuals. From our experience with the present patient, we believe that for patients with L5 pediculolysis and spondylolisthesis, the option of L5 medial pediculectomy and extension of instrumentation to L4 level should be considered.

Evaluating low back pain in adolescents.

Low back pain in adolescents is a common complaint in primary care. With an average prevalence rate of 40%, adolescent low back pain correlates with greater healthcare use, higher incidences of adult back pain, and negative effects on overall well-being. A thorough history and physical examination can increase early detection and accurate diagnosis while ensuring the judicious use of diagnostic modalities. Although underlying serious pathology is rare in adolescents with low back pain, clinicians should recognize specific signs and symptoms that necessitate urgent evaluation and intervention. This article emphasizes the value of using a thorough history and physical examination to guide the initial diagnostic workup and to enhance the early detection and accurate diagnosis of adolescents who present with low back pain.

Chronic low back pain: Relevance of a new classification based on the injury pattern.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to define the role for surgery in the treatment of chronic low back pain (cLBP) and to develop a new classification of cLBP based on the pattern of injury. HYPOTHESIS: Surgery may benefit patients with cLBP, and a new classification based on the injury pattern may be of interest. METHOD: A systematic literature review was performed by searching Medline, the Cochrane Library, the French public health database (Banque de Données en Santé Publique), Science Direct, and the National Guideline Clearinghouse. The main search terms were "back pain" OR "lumbar" OR "intervertebral disc replacement" OR "vertebrae" OR "spinal" AND "surgery" OR "surgical" OR "fusion" OR "laminectomy" OR "discectomy". RESULTS: Surgical techniques available for treating cLBP consist of fusion, disc replacement, dynamic stabilisation, and inter-spinous posterior devices. Compared to non-operative management including intensive rehabilitation therapy and cognitive behavioural therapy, fusion is not better in terms of either function (evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]) or pain (level 2). Fusion is better than non-operative management without intensive rehabilitation therapy (level 2). There is no evidence to date that one fusion technique is superior over the others regarding the clinical outcomes (assessed using the ODI). Compared to fusion or multidisciplinary rehabilitation therapy, disc replacement can produce better function and less pain, although the differences are not clinically significant (level 2). The available evidence does not support the use of dynamic stabilisation or interspinous posterior devices to treat cLBP due to degenerative disease (professional consensus within the French Society for Spinal Surgery). The following recommendations can be made: non-operative treatment must be provided for at least 1 year before considering surgery in patients with cLBP due to degenerative disease; patients must be fully informed about alternative treatment options and the risks associated with surgery; standing radiographs must be obtained to assess sagittal spinal alignment and a magnetic resonance imaging scan to determine the mechanism of injury; and, if fusion is performed, the lumbar lordotic curvature must be restored. DISCUSSION: This work establishes the need for a new classification of cLBP based on the presumptive mechanism responsible for the pain. Three categories should be distinguished: non-degenerative cLBP (previously known as symptomatic cLBP), in which the cause of pain is a trauma, spondylolysis, a tumour, an infection, or an inflammatory process; degenerative cLBP (previously known as non-specific cLBP) characterised by variable combinations of degenerative alterations in one or more discs, facet joints, and/or ligaments, with or without regional and/or global alterations in spinal alignment (which must be assessed using specific parameters); and cLBP of unknown mechanism, in which the pain seems to bear no relation to the anatomical abnormalities (and the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale may be helpful in this situation). This classification should prove useful in the future for constituting well-defined patient groups, thereby improving the assessment of treatment options. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, systematic review of level II studies.

Spondylolysis 2019 update.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Provide a comprehensive overview of lumbar spondylolysis, a frequent cause of lower back pain in children and adolescents, from evaluation to management. RECENT FINDINGS: With the surge of structured sports participation in the pediatric population, spondylolysis is a common ailment that afflicts many young athletes due to rigorous competition that taxes the growing spine with repetitive extension and rotation. SUMMARY: Spondylolysis is a fracture through the pars interarticularis. When a child presents with lower back pain, spondylolysis should be at the top of the differential. A thorough history and physical examination are essential. In addition, radiographs of the lumbar spine, anterior posterior and lateral views, MRI and, selectively, computed tomography are useful adjuncts to uncover a pars injury. Timely diagnosis facilitates early treatment which includes rest, optimizing bone health, brace treatment, and physical therapy. If delayed or untreated, spondylolysis may result in nonunion or pars defect. If symptomatic, patients may need surgery to fuse the lumbar facet joints or repair the par interarticularis.

"Temporary" Short Segment Fixation in Treating Adolescent Lumbar Spondylolysis.

BACKGROUND: We have introduced a new operation for isthmic spondylolysis in adolescents and evaluated its clinical efficacy. METHODS: A total of 30 adolescent patients with isthmic spondylolysis and chronic low back pain underwent "temporary" short-segmental pedicle screw combined with transverse device fixation and isthmic bone graft repair treatment. Radiograph and computed tomography images were evaluated during regular follow-up examinations to confirm successful bone graft fusion, after which the fixation was removed. Lumbar magnetic resonance imaging was performed before and 1 year after fixation surgery and 1 year after fixation removal. Modic and Pfirrmann grading standards were used to observe the effect of "temporary" fixation on the corresponding vertebral endplate and intervertebral disc. RESULTS: All 30 patients had complete follow-up data available at 2 years postoperatively. The low back pain symptoms had disappeared completely, and radiographs and computed tomography showed that the isthmus in all patients had achieved bony fusion. With removal of the internal fixation, motion of the fixed segment recovered. "Temporary" rigid internal fixation did not increase the corresponding vertebral endplate or intervertebral disc degeneration. CONCLUSIONS: "Temporary" short-segmental pedicle screw combined with transverse device fixation is a simple and effective method for adolescent isthmic spondylolysis with rigid internal fixation and accelerated bone graft fusion.

Radiographic analysis of the listhesis associated with lumbar isthmic spondylolysis.

BACKGROUND: In cases of spondylolysis, hypoplasia of L5 mimicking spondylolisthesis has been described, mainly based on MRI; however, the treatment implications have not been analyzed specifically. OBJECTIVE: Assess the impact of hypoplasia of the L5 vertebral body in the constitution of the spondylolisthesis associated with isthmic spondylolysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective radiographic study in the standing position was performed with 104 patients with L5 isthmic spondylolysis and 24 control subjects. RESULTS: Measurements of vertebral endplate length showed that the standard apparent posterior listhesis (APL) is made up of true listhesis (TL) and false listhesis (FL). FL is induced by hypoplasia of the L5 vertebral body relative to the S1 endplate. TL results from disk failure and leads to anterior listhesis (AL), which alters the balance of spinal curvatures. CONCLUSIONS: By integrating the potential for false listhesis into the classification systems for spondylolisthesis, we can adapt the treatment algorithms. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective radiography study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV Retrospective review of cases.

Double-level lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar spondylolysis and isthmic spondylolisthesis are common conditions. However, double-level lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis are rare. We report 24 cases of it along with a review of literature and a briefly description of the clinical and radiological features and integrated management of patients with this condition. METHODS: Of 1700 inpatients diagnosed with lumbar spondylolisthesis at our hospital between January 2008 and September 2015, we selected those with a diagnosis of double-level spondylolisthesis who underwent surgery. We analyzed the data regarding age, sex, and heavy physical labour. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were used to evaluate preoperative and postoperative neurological function and back pain. All patients underwent decompression, reduction, and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with autogenous bone chips from posterior decompression or with a cage. After the operation, we were followed up for more than 2 years to observe the effect of the operation. In the meantime, the height of the intervertebral discs was measured at follow-up, and all data are analyzed in SPSS stastic. RESULTS: Double-level spondylolisthesis occurred at the L2/L3 and L3/L4 levels in one patient, L3/4 and L4/L5 levels in 11 patients, and L4/L5 and L5/S1 levels in 12 patients. Nine patients also had spondylolysis. Twenty patients underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion and internal fixation with autologous bone chip, and 4 of them underwent cage and autogenous bone graft fixation. Postoperatively, the major symptoms (neurological dysfunction and low-back pain) improved significantly. Comparison of JOA and VAS scores indicated effective recovery of neurological function (p < 0.05). Postoperative follow-up demonstrated satisfactory interbody fusion and pars interarticularis healing. CONCLUSIONS: Double-level lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis occurred more often in women. Most common site of double lumbar spondylolisthesis was L3-L5. The treatment principle was the same as that for single-level spondylolisthesis, but the reset order is questionable. Both, posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with autogenous bone chips from posterior decompression or with cage can relieve discomfort in most patients. In our follow-up, we found that there was a high degree of loss in disk height when autogenous bone was used. Therefore, we suggest the use of a cage.

Headless compression screw in the neuronavigation-guided and microscope-assisted treatment of spondylolysis.

Since 1968, many surgical techniques used in repairing the pars defect of the vertebra have been reported. Technological advances are giving rise to new ways of obtaining the best outcome using less invasive methods, which are more accurate, simple and effective. To treat cases of spondylolysis such as pseudarthrosis, we used neuro-navigation and microscopy through a 2.5-cm skin incision to approach the pars defect, freshen the fracture and place a type of screw that, until now, has never been used for this purpose. This is a novel technique, which guarantees prolonged compression and sufficient stability to facilitate the prompt healing of the vertebra. We present 2 cases of L5 spondylolysis treated with our technique, a modification of Buck's technique. A detailed description of the screw selection, surgical technical details, follow-up and outcome are discussed.

Lumbar spondylolysis: A report of four cases from two generations of a family.

Spondylolysis is a major cause of back pain in children and adolescents. The prevalence of spondylolysis depends on the sex, race, and congenital abnormality. These biases suggest hereditary predisposition as an etiology of spondylolysis. However, no conclusive evidence still exists regarding the inheritance for spondylolysis. Herein, we report rare cases with familial occurrence of lumbar spondylolysis. In two generations of a Japanese family, three brothers including identical twins complained of back pain related to sports activities. Clinical, radiographic, and computed tomographic examinations identified spondylolysis at L4 and L5 in all these boys. The father experienced long-term back pain and had spondylolisthesis at L4-L5 and healed spondylolysis at L5. The daughter and mother did not show any lumbar spondylolysis. The frequent development of spondylolysis at L4, a rarely affected segment, in four of six family members (66.7%) support that lumbar spondylolysis has an underlying genetic etiology, primarily autosomal dominant inheritance.

A rare case of non-traumatic, multi-level, bilateral pedicle fractures of the lumbar spine in a 60-year-old patient.

INTRODUCTION: We report a 60-year-old patient who sustained non-traumatic, multi-level, bilateral lumbar pedicle fractures in the setting of unilateral lumbar spondylolysis. A possible fracture mechanism is evaluated and a review of the literature is presented. Whereas contralateral pedicle fractures of lumbar vertebrae with unilateral spondylosis are well described in young athletes, there is only one case report of multi-level, bilateral pedicle fractures of the lumbar spine in a young patient who sustained a high-impact motorcycle accident. To our knowledge, this is the first report of multi-level, bilateral pedicular fractures of the lumbar spine without a history of trauma. METHODS: The clinical case of a 60-year-old patient with lumbar pain radiating in both legs without antecedent trauma is presented. Besides an idiopathic primary adrenal failure, no further co-morbidities existed. Radiologic investigations showed acute bilateral pedicles' fractures of the lumbar vertebrae two to four (L2-4) and a unilateral spondylolysis L4-5. Dorsoventral instrumentation from L1 to L5 was performed in two steps. RESULTS: The patient had no neurological deficits at discharge. Perioperative cortisol substitution was arranged and continued in the course. At final follow-up after 6 years the patient was pain-free and radiographs confirmed complete fusion of L1-5 with mild degeneration of the adjacent segments. CONCLUSION: The presented fracture pattern has not been described to date. Because of multi-level involvement, instability requiring operative stabilisation was presumed and confirmed during surgery.

Etiology of Adult-onset Stress Fracture in the Lumbar Spine.

STUDY DESIGN: This study was a case series. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this paper was to present a case series of fresh stress fractures (spondylolysis) in the lumbar spines of adult athletes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lumbar spondylolysis is a stress fracture of the pars interarticularis, which is generally considered a disease of children or adolescence. There is only 1 case series written in English reporting on adult-onset fresh spondylolysis. METHODS: Eleven patients aged 20-27 years are included in this case series. A retrospective analysis was made of events that may cause stress fracture such as traumatic episodes or sports activities, spinal level, radiologic findings, stage of spondylolysis, treatment, and prognosis. RESULTS: Among the 11 patients, two had bilateral early-stage spondylolysis, 7 had unilateral early-stage spondylolysis and 2 had unilateral progressive-stage spondylolysis. Three occurred subsequent to a preexisting terminal-stage spondylolysis in the contralateral side, 1 occurred subsequent to a terminal-stage spondylolysis at the adjacent spinal level, and 1 occurred subsequent to a terminal-stage spondylolysis at a distant level. Thirteen pedicles adjacent to the pars interarticularis in the 11 patients showed bone marrow edema-like signal on magnetic resonance imaging. Six spondylolyses were found at L5, 2 each at L3 and L4, and 1 spondylolysis at L2. The 11 patients were divided into 4 groups according to suspected pathogenic mechanism: preexistent spondylolysis in the contralateral side, alteration of the athletic event, apparent traumatic episode, and others. Conservative treatment was prescribed for return to sports in all cases. Although 1 patient retired because of persistent low back pain, the remaining 10 patients returned to competition. CONCLUSIONS: Although lumbar spondylolysis is generally recognized to occur in childhood or adolescence, fresh lumbar spondylolysis should be included in the differential diagnosis of adult low back pain when patients are high-level athletes. Conservative treatment should be attempted for adult patients.

Benign Natural History of Spondylolysis in Adolescence With Midterm Follow-Up.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. OBJECTIVES: To use the Micheli Functional Scale to assess adolescent patients with spondylolysis treated conservatively at midterm follow-up. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND: Spondylolysis is a common source of back pain for adolescents and is generally managed with bracing and physical therapy. There is little data regarding the results of conservative management of spondylolysis over time. METHODS: Four major academic pediatric institutions performed a retrospective chart review of patients from 5 to 21 years of age with the initial diagnosis of spondylolysis. Inclusion criteria were patients who initially underwent conservative management and had a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. The patients were contacted and asked to complete the Micheli Functional Scale Survey. RESULTS: A total of 295 patients with the diagnosis of spondylolysis were identified and contacted. Sixty-one subjects with spondylolysis completed the follow-up survey. Sixty of 61 respondents (98%) answered questions regarding their current pain level. Thirty-five of 60 (58.3%) reported no pain (0/10) and 47/60 (78%) rated their pain at 3 or less, whereas 22% (13/60) rated their pain as 4 or higher. There was no correlation with pain ratings on the follow-up survey and radiographic healing at initial management. Of the 61 patients, 50 returned to sports (82%), 8 did not return (13%), and 5 returned to most but not all of their sports (8%). No correlation was observed between radiographic healing and return to sports (p = .4885). CONCLUSION: Using a validated functional scale, this study demonstrated that with conservative management of spondylolysis a majority of patients at an average of 8 years out self-report a return to sports (90%), though many reported continued pain (42%) and interference with activities (67%). There was no correlation observed between radiographic evidence of healing and pain or return to sports with a mean follow-up of 8 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Multicenter retrospective case series.

Low Back Pain in Adolescents: A 1-Year Analysis of Eventual Diagnoses.

BACKGROUND: Back pain in adolescents is very common and often seen in the office for evaluation of potential spinal pathology. Pediatric back pain has often thought to be from serious identifiable causes such as spondylolysis, spondylolisthesis, tumor, or infection. A follow-up analysis of adolescents initially presenting with back pain to their eventual subsequent diagnosis within 1 year has not been reported on a large scale with a national sample. METHODS: A national insurance database (PearlDiver Patient Records Database) was queried for ICD-9 codes to identify patients aged 10 to 19 years with back pain from 2007 to 2010. These patients were tracked for imaging obtained, and eventual development of subsequent associated spinal pathology diagnoses using CPT and ICD-9 codes for up to 1 year after initial presentation. RESULTS: A total of 215,592 adolescents were identified presenting with low back pain (LBP) from 2007 to 2010. Over 80% of adolescents with LBP had no identifiable diagnosis within 1 year. The most common associated subsequent diagnoses were lumbar strain/spasm (8.9%), followed by scoliosis (4.7%), lumbar degenerative disk disease (1.7%), and lumbar disk herniation (1.3%). The rates of all other diagnoses including spondylolysis, spondylolisthesis, infection, tumor, and fracture had <1% association with LBP. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, adolescent LBP is a common diagnosis for which underlying serious pathology is rare. The most common diagnosis aside from strain or muscle spasm associated with LBP are scoliosis and degenerative disk disease. Pediatric orthopaedists often are consulted on patients with LBP and should always have high suspicion for potential serious spinal pathology, but should recognize the most common etiologies of back pain in adolescence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-case series.

Hysterical conversion paralysis in an adolescent boy with lumbar spondylolysis.

We describe a case of recurrent hysterical paralysis triggered by low back pain because of lumbar spondylolysis. A 16-year-old male soccer player was referred to our institution with five previous episodes of acute paralysis triggered by severe low back pain. We performed direct surgical repair of the terminal-stage bilateral spondylolysis at L4 using a hook-rod system. His chronic low back pain was completely resolved, and no further episodes of hysterical paralysis have occurred after surgery. Spine surgeons should be aware of possible hysterical conversion paralysis when there is discrepancy between radiological and neurological findings.

Nonconsecutive Pars Interarticularis Defects.

Lumbar spondylolysis is a well-recognized condition occurring in adolescents because of repetitive overuse in sports. Nonconsecutive spondylolysis involving the lumbar spine is rare. In contrast to single-level pars defects that respond well to conservative treatment, there is no consensus about the management of multiple-level pars fractures; a few reports indicated that conservative management is successful, and the majority acknowledged that surgery is often required. The current study presents a rare case of pars fracture involving nonconsecutive segments and discusses the management options. In this case report, we review the patient's history, clinical examination, radiologic findings, and management, as well as the relevant literature. An 18-year-old man presented to the clinic with worsening lower back pain related to nonconsecutive pars fractures at L2 and L5. After 6 months of conservative management, diagnostic computed tomography-guided pars block was used to localize the symptomatic level at L2, which was treated surgically; the L5 asymptomatic pars fracture did not require surgery. At the last follow-up 2 years after surgery, the patient was playing baseball and basketball, and denied any back pain. This article reports a case of rare nonconsecutive pars fractures. Conservative management for at least 6 months is recommended. Successful management depends on the choice of appropriate treatment for each level. Single-photon emission computed tomography scan, and computed tomography-guided pars block are valuable preoperative tools to identify the symptomatic level in such a case.