Repair of type II paraesophageal hernia with Nissen fundoplication in a patient with von Willebrand disease and spondylolisthesis - a clinical case report.

Hiatal hernias continue to be fairly common in clinical practice. However, the variety of different symptoms presented by patients may hinder establishing the ultimate diagnosis. Nevertheless, currently, the diagnosis of hiatal hernia can be easily established, based on barium swallow radiography. We would like to present a clinical case report of a patient with complex medical history, including von Willebrand disease, degenerative spinal disease, and chronic sinusitis, who was finally diagnosed with hiatal hernia and treated with a standard laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Our case focuses on the significance of comorbidities on patients' symptoms, which sometimes may mislead the therapeutic process.

Risk factors for early-onset adjacent segment degeneration after one-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) is a major postoperative complication associated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Early-onset ASD may differ pathologically from late-onset ASD. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for early-onset ASD at the cranial segment occurring within 2 years after surgery. A retrospective study was performed for 170 patients with L4 degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent one-segment PLIF. Of these patients, 20.6% had early-onset ASD at L3-4. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, preoperative larger % slip, vertebral bone marrow edema at the cranial segment on preoperative MRI (odds ratio 16.8), and surgical disc space distraction (cut-off 4.0 mm) were significant independent risk factors for early-onset ASD. Patients with preoperative imaging findings of bone marrow edema at the cranial segment had a 57.1% rate of early-onset ASD. A vacuum phenomenon and/or concomitant decompression at the cranial segment, the degree of surgical reduction of slippage, and lumbosacral spinal alignment were not risk factors for early-onset ASD. The need for fusion surgery requires careful consideration if vertebral bone marrow edema at the cranial segment adjacent to the fusion segment is detected on preoperative MRI, due to the negative impact of this edema on the incidence of early-onset ASD.

Lumbosacral transitional vertebra in spondylolisthesis: frequency, demographic findings, and clinical characteristics.

BACKGROUND: The association of LSTV with low back pain has been debated in the literature for nearly a century, but the relationship between LSTV and spondylolisthesis is still under discussion. There is currently no valid information about LSTV's prevalence in Iran. This study investigated the relationship between the presence of LSTV and lumbosacral spondylolisthesis regarding frequency, gender and age variation, grade and level of spondylolisthesis, and clinical signs and symptoms. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included spondylolisthesis patients admitted for surgery between March 2021 to December 2022. All patients underwent CT imaging. After evaluating medical records, the baseline data were collected. Patients were categorized into No LSTV, Sacralization, and Lumbarization groups. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the studied groups were compared using an independent T-test and Chi-Square. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the age and sex variations between groups. RESULTS: 219 patients with a mean age of 57.07 ± 11.04 were included. A significant relationship was observed between the presence of sacralization and gender diversity with female predominance (P = 0.01). The level of spondylolisthesis and the presence of motor deficits (paresis) significantly differed among study groups (P < 0.05). Sacralization group exhibited a greater prevalence of higher grades of listhesis compared to the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: LSTV is frequently seen in spondylolisthesis patients. Sacralization is the common type of LSTV in spondylolisthesis patients, possibly leading to an increased risk for higher grades of vertebral slip and higher rates of motor deficit signs and symptoms. The presence of sacralization results in a significant increase in the incidence of higher levels of spondylolisthesis, especially the L4-L5*(sacralized L5) level. There is no relationship between age and the presence of LSTV in spondylolisthesis.

Analysis of Factors Associated with Lumbar Degenerative Disease Complicated by Baastrup's Disease.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the factors associated with the occurrence of Baastrup's disease (BA) in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases (LDDs). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 168 patients with LDDs (including lumbar disc herniation, lumbar spinal stenosis, and lumbar spondylolisthesis) who were treated at our hospital from January 2020 to January 2023, comprising 95 males and 73 females, aged 48-84 years.Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of Baastrup's disease: those with BA (Group A) and those without BA (Group B).Relevant patient factors were extracted, including age, gender, occupation, smoking history, alcohol consumption history, body mass index, bone density, presence of internal diseases (diabetes, hypertension), lumbar lordosis angle, endplate Modic changes, degree of intervertebral disc degeneration, and facet joint degeneration (Weishaupt grading).Statistical analysis was performed using, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 26.0 software to compare the differences in these factors between the two groups, and statistically significant results were included in a multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Univariate analysis indicated that there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of gender, smoking history, alcohol consumption history, bone density, presence of internal diseases (diabetes, hypertension), lumbar lordosis angle, and endplate Modic changes (P>0.05),whereas age, occupation, body mass index, degree of intervertebral disc degeneration, and degree of facet joint degeneration showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.05).Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age, degree of intervertebral disc degeneration, and degree of facet joint degeneration were independent risk factors for the occurrence of BA in patients with LDDs (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: BA is relatively common in patients with LDDs, and advanced age, severe intervertebral disc degeneration, and facet joint degeneration are its independent risk factors.

The clinical and radiographic degenerative spondylolisthesis classification and its predictive value.

INTRODUCTION: The clinical and radiographic degenerative spondylolisthesis (CARDS) classification is a new classification that has been introduced for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). It has four categories. Our study aimed to analyse the functional and radiographic outcome following DS surgery based on the preoperative CARDS classification. METHODS: A retrospective study of the prospectively collected Australian Spine Registry database was performed. Data on demographics, patient reported outcome measures including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and EQ-5D-3 L scores, and changes in radiographic measurements were analysed. Based on the preoperative findings all x-rays were classified applying the CARDS classification. RESULTS: Between 2018 and 2021 a total of 54-patients were identified as having had surgery for DS at L4/5. The mean age was 65.3 ± 11.3years and females were predominantly affected (61%). Most cases were of CARDS type C (46%), followed by type B (29%). CARDS type A and D were observed in 18% and 6% respectively. Preoperatively, the L4/5 lordosis was 19.8 ± 6.3° and lumbar lordosis 43.9 ± 12.8°. Postoperatively the L4/5 lordosis alignment changed significantly to 23.5 ± 8.8° (p < 0.05). Preoperatively, the CARDS classification was 34.8 ± 17.4 (type A), 40.5 ± 11.0 (type B), 43.8 ± 12.9 and 50.0 ± 14.4 for type D (Pearson-coefficient 0.284, p = 0.041). Postoperatively this changed to 22.7 ± 16.1, 28.7 ± 21.2, 12.5 ± 13.1, and 6.5 ± 2.1 respectively. Similar improvements were observed for the EQ-5D-3 L. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the CARDS classification correlates with preoperative functional scores as well as helping to predict response to surgery. CARDS will likely assist in operative planning and prognostication. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, therapeutic and prognostic study.

Comparative Analysis of Three Posterior-Only Surgical Techniques for Isthmic L5-S1 Spondylolisthesis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare adults with isthmic L5-S1 spondylolisthesis who were treated with three different surgical techniques: PS-only, TS, and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion/posterior lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF/PLIF). METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of adults with L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis (grade ≥2) who underwent primary all-posterior operations with pedicle screws. Patients were excluded if they had <1 year follow-up, anterior approaches, and trans-sacral fibular grafts. Patient demographics and surgical, radiographic, and clinical data were compared between groups based on the method of anterior column support: none (PS-only), TS, and TLIF/PLIF. RESULTS: Sixty patients met inclusion criteria (male patients 21, female patients 39, average age 47 ± 15 years, PS-only 16; TS 20; TLIF/PLIF 24). TS patients more commonly had high-grade slips and markedly greater slip percentage, lumbosacral kyphosis, and pelvic incidence. The three groups were similar for smoking status, visual analog scores/Oswestry Disability Index scores (VAS/ODI), surgical data, and average follow-up (40.1 ± 31.2 months). All groups had similarly notable improvements in Meyerding grade and lumbosacral angle. Slip reduction percentage was similar between groups. While there was a markedly higher overall complication rate for PS-only constructs, all groups had similarly notable improvements in ODI and VAS back scores. CONCLUSIONS: All-posterior techniques for L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis resulted in excellent improvement in preoperative symptoms and HRQoL scores and similar radiographic alignment. Trans-sacral screws were more commonly used for high-grade slips. The use of anterior column support resulted in fewer overall complications than posterior-only instrumentation.

Is it necessary to extend fusion to L4 when correcting pediatric L5-S1 spondylolisthesis?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate whether extending fusion to L4 is imperative in the surgical treatment of pediatric L5-S1 spondylolisthesis. METHODS: This retrospective analysis encompassed 68 pediatric cases of dysplastic L5-S1 spondylolisthesis who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery at two hospitals. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the upper instrumented vertebra (group L4 and group L5). Data were collected from medical records and radiological images obtained preoperatively and at last follow-up. Radiographic parameters including slip percentage (SP), lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence (PI), Spinal Deformity Study Group dysplastic lumbosacral angle (SDSG-LSA), pelvic tilt (PT), Dubousset's lumbosacral angle (Dub-LSA), sacral slope (SS), and severity index (SI) were measured. Surgery-related data and complication data were also collected. The incidence rates of complications were compared, including those of neurological deficit, adjacent-segment instability (ASI), and other complications. ASI was defined as progression of slippage > 3 mm or posterior opening > 5° in the adjacent segment. Clinical outcomes were assessed with the numeric rating scale (NRS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. The follow-up period for all patients lasted a minimum of 2 years. RESULTS: Among all 68 patients, group L4 consisted of 15 patients and group L5 comprised 53 patients. The patients included in both groups had comparable baseline demographic characteristics and radiographic parameters. Postoperative SP and SDSG-LSA were significantly lower in group L5 (p < 0.05). No other postoperative radiographic differences were observed between groups. One patient in group L4 and 3 patients in group L5 experienced transient neurological deficits (p > 0.05). There were 13 cases of ASI in group L5 compared with none in group L4 (24.5% vs 0%, p > 0.05). Of the 13 patients with ASI, 4 underwent revision surgery due to L4-5 level instability and clinical symptoms. The remaining individuals exhibited no symptoms, and regular annual follow-up assessments are being conducted for all patients. The NRS and ODI scores at final follow-up did not exhibit any significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Fusion to L5 could achieve comparable satisfactory results to fixation to L4, albeit with increased likelihood of ASI. Extension of fusion to L4 may not be necessary for most patients with pediatric L5-S1 spondylolisthesis.

Short-term and mid-term evaluation of three types of minimally invasive lumbar fusion surgery for treatment of L4/L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis.

This was a single-centre retrospective study. Minimally invasive techniques for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF), oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF), and percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF) have been extensively used for lumbar degenerative diseases. The present study analyses the short-term and mid-term clinical effects of the above three minimally invasive techniques on L4/L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis. In this retrospective study, 98 patients with L4/L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis received MIS-TLIF, 107 received OLIF, and 114 received Endo-TLIF. All patients were followed up for at least one year. We compared patient data, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), Oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analogue scale of low back pain (VAS-B), visual analogue scale of leg pain (VAS-L), surgical time, blood loss, drainage volume, hospital stay, complications, and neurological status. Moreover, we performed imaging evaluations, including lumbar lordosis angle (LLA), disc height (DH) and intervertebral fusion status. No significant differences were noted in age, sex, BMI, preoperative ODI, preoperative VAS-B, preoperative VAS-L, preoperative LLA, or preoperative DH. Patients who underwent OLIF had significantly decreased blood loss, a lower drainage volume, and a shorter hospital stay than those who underwent MIS-TLIF or Endo-TLIF (P < 0.05). The VAS-B in the OLIF group significantly decreased compared with in the MIS-TLIF and Endo-TLIF groups at 6 and 12 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). The VAS-L in the Endo-TLIF group significantly decreased compared with that in the MIS-TLIF and OLIF groups at 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). The ODI in the OLIF group was significantly better than that in the MIS-TLIF and Endo-TLIF groups at 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences in the incidence of complications and healthcare cost were found among the three groups. Follow-up LLA and DH changes were significantly lower in the OLIF group than in the other groups (P < 0.05). The intervertebral fusion rate was significantly higher in the OLIF group than in the other groups at 6 and 12 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). In conclusion, while MIS-TLIF, OLIF, and Endo-TLIF techniques can effectively treat patients with L4/5 degenerative spondylolisthesis, OLIF has more benefits, including less operative blood loss, a shorter hospital stay, a smaller drainage volume, efficacy for back pain, effective maintenance of lumbar lordosis angle and disc height, and a higher fusion rate. OLIF should be the preferred surgical treatment for patients with L4/5 degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Biportal endoscopic-assisted cortical bone trajectory screw placement and lumbar interbody fusion.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopically assisted screw fixation with lumbar interbody fusion is rarely performed. We succeeded in implanting the cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws under the guidance of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE). METHOD: We attempted endoscopically assisted screw fixation in a patient with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Through a third portal, ipsilateral CBT screws were implanted without complications. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully performed unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) with CBT and reversed CBT screws. Compared with percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) placement, this procedure is a minimally invasive, endoscopic alternative that allows precise screw placement.

Sagittal Alignment in the Degenerative Lumbar Spine: Surgical Planning.

➤ Sagittal alignment of the spine has gained attention in the field of spinal deformity surgery for decades. However, emerging data support the importance of restoring segmental lumbar lordosis and lumbar spinal shape according to the pelvic morphology when surgically addressing degenerative lumbar pathologies such as degenerative disc disease and spondylolisthesis.➤ The distribution of caudal lordosis (L4-S1) and cranial lordosis (L1-L4) as a percentage of global lordosis varies by pelvic incidence (PI), with cephalad lordosis increasing its contribution to total lordosis as PI increases.➤ Spinal fusion may lead to iatrogenic deformity if performed without attention to lordosis magnitude and location in the lumbar spine.➤ A solid foundation of knowledge with regard to optimal spinal sagittal alignment is beneficial when performing lumbar spinal surgery, and thoughtful planning and execution of lumbar fusions with a focus on alignment may improve patient outcomes.

How Does the Slump Sitting Radiograph Increase Proportion of Segmental Instability and Kyphotic Alignment of Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis?

OBJECTIVE: Clinical and radiographic degenerative spondylolisthesis (CARDS) classification was proposed to differentiate homogenous lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS) subgroups. The sitting radiograph exhibited lumbar malalignment with maximum lumbar kyphosis, intervertebral kyphosis, and spondylolisthesis.This study aimed to assess the sitting radiograph for distribution of clinical and radiographic degenerative spondylolisthesis classification, and to elucidate its significance for exhibiting kyphotic alignment (CARDS type D) and segmental instability. METHODS: A cohort of 101 patients with symptomatic lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS) between September 2018 and December 2020 were recruited. The distribution and relibility of CARDS classification with or without sitting radiograph was assessed. The translational and angular range of motion and segmental instability was also evaluated. Univariate analysis of variance was used for multiple groups, and the least significant difference for two groups. Kappa consistency test of intrarater and interrater was evaluated for CARDS classification with or without sitting radiograph. Chi-square test was used to compare paried categorical data. RESULTS: Utility of sitting radiographs for CARDS classification revealed higher percentage of type D than that without the sitting radiograph (p < 0.001). The sitting radiograph revealed a larger slip distance than the flexion radiograph (p = 0.003), as well as a lower slip angle than flexion radiograph (p < 0.001). The sitting-supine modality demonstrated the largest translational range of motion compared to the sitting-extension (p < 0.001) and flexion-extension modalities (p < 0.001). The sitting-supine modality showed larger angular range of motion than the flexion-extension modality (p < 0.001). The percentage of flexion, extension, upright, supine, and sitting radiograph to identify translational instability was higher than that without sitting radiograph (p < 0.001), as well as taking angular motion ≥10° as an additional criterion for segmental instability (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The CARDS classification was reliable for LDS. The sitting radiograph showed maximal slip distance and kyphotic slip angle. Application of the sitting radiograph was necessary for evaluating segmental instability and kyphotic alignment of LDS.

Evolution of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with key radiographic features.

Spondylolisthesis is a common finding in middle-aged and older adults with back pain. The pathophysiology of degenerative spondylolisthesis is a subject of controversy regarding not only its etiology but also the mechanisms of its progression. It is theorized that degeneration of the facets and discs can lead to segmental instability, leading to displacement over time. Kirkaldy-Willis divided degenerative spondylolisthesis into three phases: dysfunction, instability, and finally, restabilization. There is a paucity of literature on the unification of the radiological hallmarks seen in spondylolisthesis within these phases. The radiographic features include (1) facet morphology/arthropathy, (2) facet effusion, (3) facet vacuum, (4) synovial cyst, (5) interspinous ligament bursitis, and (6) vacuum disc as markers of dysfunction, instability, and/or restabilization. We discuss these features, which can be seen on X-ray, CT, and MRI, with the intention of establishing a timeline upon which they present clinically. Spondylolisthesis is initiated as either degeneration of the intervertebral disc or facet joints. Early degeneration can be seen as facet vacuum without considerable arthropathy. As the vertebral segment becomes increasingly dynamic, fluid accumulates within the facet joint space. Further degeneration will lead to the advancement of facet arthropathy, degenerative disc disease, and posterior ligamentous complex pathology. Facet effusion can eventually be replaced with a vacuum in severe facet osteoarthritis. Intervertebral disc vacuum continues to accumulate with further cleft formation and degeneration. Ultimately, autofusion of the vertebra at the facets and endplates can be observed. With this review, we hope to increase awareness of these radiographical markers and their timeline, thus placing them within the framework of the currently accepted model of degenerative spondylolisthesis, to help guide future research and to help refine management guidelines.

Fusion with and without lever reduction in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The reduction of slipped vertebra is often performed during surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS). This approach, while potentially improving clinical and radiological outcomes, also carries a risk of increased complications due to the reduction process. To address this, we introduced an innovative lever reduction technique for DLS treatment. This study aims to investigate the clinical efficacy, radiological outcomes, and complications of fusion with or without lever reduction. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from a registry of patients who underwent lumbar fusion surgery for DLS, with a follow-up of at least 24 months. Self-reported measures included visual analog scale (VAS) for back or leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Radiological assessments encompassed spondylolisthesis percentage (SP), focal lordosis (FL), and lumbar lordosis (LL). Complications were categorized using the modified Clavien-Dindo classification (MCDC) scheme. Patients were assigned to the reduction group (RG) and non-reduction group (NRG) based on the application of the lever reduction technique. Clinical and radiological outcomes at baseline, immediately after surgery, and at the last follow-up were compared. RESULTS: A total of 281 patients were analyzed (123 NRG, 158 RG). Baseline patient demographics, comorbidities, and surgical characteristics were similarly distributed between groups except for operating time (NRG 129.25 min, RG 138.04 min, P = .009). Both groups exhibited significant clinical improvement after surgery (all, P = .000), with no substantial difference between groups (VAS, ODI, or the ability to reach MCID). Patients in RG showed statistically lower SP and higher FL during follow-up (all, P = .000). LL was comparable at different time points within each group or at the same time point between the two groups (all, P > .050). The overall complication rate (NRG 38.2%, RG 27.2%, P = .050) or specific complication rates per MCDC were similar between groups (all, P > .050). Patients in RG were predisposed to a lower risk of adjacent segment degeneration (ASDeg) (NRG 9.8%, RG 6.3%, P = .035). CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in postoperative measures such as VAS scores for back and leg pain, ODI, the ability to reach MCID, overall complication rate, or specific complication rates per MCDC between surgical approaches. However, fusion with lever reduction demonstrated a notable advantage in restoring segmental spinal sagittal alignment and reducing the occurrence of ASDeg compared to in situ fusion.

L4/5 Disc Herniation: Not Unusually Accompanied with L5/S1 Low-Grade Spondylolytic Spondylolisthesis.

OBJECTIVE: Isthmic spondylolisthesis (IS) is distinguished by a congenital defect or acquired fracture of the pars interarticularis. Numerous studies on L5 low-grade IS have been carried out; however, there is a paucity of data regarding the condition of L5 IS concomitant with L4/5 disc herniation. This study aimed to identify the incidence rate and to illustrate the possible risk factors for L4/5 disc herniation in L5 low-grade IS patients. METHODS: A total of 268 consecutive patients diagnosed as L5/S1 low-grade IS between May 2017 and May 2022 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Depending on the presence of L4/5 disc herniation or not, patients were divided into an L4/5 disc herniation group (L4/5 DH) and an L4/5 non-disc herniation group (L4/5 non-DH). Radiographic parameters were measured, and the ratios of L4-S1 segmental lordosis (SL) to lumbar lordosis (LDI), L4 inferior endplate (IEP) to L5 superior endplate (SEP) (L4 IEP/L5 SEP), and L5 IEP to S1 SEP (L5 IEP/S1 SEP) were compared between groups. The Pfirrmann grade of the L4/5 disc and the L5/S1 disc, and Roussouly classifications of each patient were also recorded. Univariate analysis (including independent-samples t-test and χ2 -test) and multiple logistic regression analysis were performed to analyze the data. RESULTS: There were 40 patients (14.9%) in the L4/5 DH group. The Roussouly classification differed significantly between groups. As demonstrated by the Pfirrmann grade, the L4/5 DH group showed more advanced disc degeneration at L4/5 than the L4/5 non-DH group. In contrast to the L4/5 non-DH group, the L4/5 DH group had a significantly larger L4 IEP, L4 IEP/L5 SEP, S1 SEP, and LDI while smaller L4/5 disc angle, L4/5 disc height, slip percentage, lumbar lordosis, and sacral slope. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that higher L4/5 disc Pfirrmann grade (p = 0.004), decreased L4/5 disc height (p < 0.001), and lower L5 slip percentage (p = 0.022) were significantly associated with the occurrence of L4/5 DH. CONCLUSIONS: L4/5 disc herniation is not unusually accompanied by L5/S1 low-grade IS. Advanced L4/5 disc degeneration, decreased L4/5 disc height, and lower L5 slip percentage might be significantly associated with L4/5 disc herniation.

Does vacuum phenomenon at non-fused discs affect the postoperative course after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients showing a positive value of difference in lumbar lordosis?

INTRODUCTION: Preoperative difference in lumbar lordosis (DiLL) was associated with surgical outcomes after single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Patients with DiLL>0 (DiLL (+)) tended to show worse clinical outcomes and postoperative greater restoration of lumbar lordosis (LL). However, some patients with DiLL (+) showed relatively good outcomes and no postoperative LL restration. This study aimed to elucidate whether the lumbar intervertebral disc vacuum phenomenon (VP) influences clinical course after single-level TLIF in patients with DiLL (+) and DiLL (-). METHODS: Patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with single-level TLIF were included. Pre- and postoperative LL were measured, and postoperative LL improvement was calculated. Preoperative DiLL was calculated as preoperative supine LL minus standing LL. Severity of VP at the non-fused discs (SVP (non-FS)) was evaluated using preoperative reconstructed computed tomography imaging. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Oswestry disability index, visual analogue scale (VAS; low back pain (LBP), lower-extremity pain, numbness, and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Patients were stratified by the median preoperative SVP (non-FS) score into severe and mild VP groups in patients with DiLL (+) or DiLL (-), and their surgical outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Overall, 89 patients were included. In patients with DiLL (+) (n = 37), patients with severe VP showed worse clinical outcomes, particulary for LBP and DiLL (+) patients with mild VP showed greater LL improvement (6.5° ± 10.0°). In patients with DiLL(-) (n = 52), patients with severe VP showed worse clinical outcomes, particularly for LBP and no differences in preoperative, postoperative, and improvement of LL were observed between two groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with DiLL (+) and DiLL (-) showed different clinical courses depending on VP severity at the non-fused discs after single-level TLIF.

Surgical Treatment of Developmental Dysplastic Lumbosacral Spondylolisthesis: Additional Help from an Intervertebral Distraction, Correction, and Reduction Device.

BACKGROUND: In mid- to high-grade adult dysplastic spondylolisthesis, surgeons are faced with three underlying components: angular, translational, and collapse of the disk. In extremely narrow intervertebral spaces, it is difficult to distract and lift the vertebral bodies by the pedicle screw system alone. In this prospective case control study, we analyzed the efficacy of the latest prototypes (distraction, correction, and reduction [DCR] instrument) with intervertebral application in terms of distraction, correction of segmental kyphosis, and slip reduction. METHODS: Twelve adult patients (5 male and 7 female patients) were enrolled in this study. The average age was 42 years (range: 17-67 years) and in all cases the maneuver was documented during the surgery. The amount of slip reduction, the lumbosacral angle according to the Spinal Deformity Study Group dysplastic angle (dys-SDGG), and the disk height were measured preoperatively, intraoperatively, 3 months after surgery, and during the latest follow-up (range: 3-44 months). The relative height of the lumbosacral disk was determined in relation to the disk height in L3/L4. RESULTS: Slippage ranged from 17 to 67%. Overall, the average slippage was 45% preoperatively and 4.8% after the reduction maneuver. The average ratio of the disk height was 0.3 preoperatively, 1.0 intraoperatively, and 0.9 at the latest follow-up. Two patients showed significant kyphotic changes, and these patients had an 18- and 21-degree lordotic improvement. From those who had a lumbosacral kyphosis >20 degrees, only one patient did not show any lordotic improvement. All other patients had a significant lordotic improvement. In total, the lumbosacral angle changed from 15 to 23 degrees. CONCLUSION: The application of an intervertebral distractor with a mobile thigh has a good clinical and radiologic outcome for mid- to high-grade adult dysplastic spondylolisthesis in terms of distraction, kyphosis correction, and reduction of underlying slippage. The described hardware failures and the complications were not related to the DCR device.

Is unilateral-approach full-endoscopic lumbar fusion effective for single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis with bilateral symptoms? A preliminary report of 43 CT analysis.

PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical results and radiological parameters changes after unilateral-approach endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-LIF) for lumbar spondylolisthesis with bilateral symptoms. METHODS: 43 single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis patients with bilateral lower limb symptoms were included from June 2020 to May 2022. All patients underwent unilateral-approach Endo-LIF and postoperative computed tomography. Radiological parameters including disk height (DH), degree of upper vertebral slip (DUVS), and foramen intervertebral parameters including bilateral foraminal height (FH), contralateral foraminal areas (FA) were evaluated. The clinical outcomes including low back pain and bilateral leg pain were evaluated using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) before and after surgery. RESULTS: All cases were successfully completed surgery and followed for average 15.16 ± 5.2 months. DH (44% ± 11%) and DUVS were significantly improvement postoperatively compared with preoperatively (p < 0.05). Statistically significant increases in bilateral FH (25% ± 11% on the surgical side, 17% ± 8% on the contralateral side) and contralateral FA (26% ± 6%) were observed (p < 0.05). The VAS and the ODI scores were significantly decreased in comparison with the preoperative scores (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Unilateral-approach with contralateral indirect decompression in Endo-LIF can acquire satisfactory clinical outcomes. Therefore, unilateral-approach Endo-LIF may be a promising option for lumbar spondylolisthesis with bilateral symptoms.

Severe Intervertebral Vacuum Phenomenon is Associated With Higher Preoperative Low Back Pain, ODI, and Indication for Fusion in Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study of prospective collected data. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the association between intervertebral vacuum phenomenon (IVP) and clinical parameters in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: IVP is a sign of advanced disc degeneration. The correlation between IVP severity and low back pain in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis has not been previously analyzed. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent surgery. Vacuum phenomenon was measured on computed tomography scan and classified into mild, moderate, and severe. A lumbar vacuum severity (LVS) scale was developed based on vacuum severity. The associations between IVP at L4/5 and the LVS scale, preoperative and postoperative low back pain, as well as the Oswestry Disability Index was assessed. The association of IVP at L4/5 and the LVS scale and surgical decision-making, defined as decompression alone or decompression and fusion, was assessed through univariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 167 patients (52.7% female) were included in the study. The median age was 69 years (interquartile range 62-72). Overall, 100 (59.9%) patients underwent decompression and fusion and 67 (40.1%) underwent decompression alone. The univariable regression demonstrated a significantly increased odds ratio (OR) for back pain in patients with more severe IVP at L4/5 [OR=1.69 (95% CI 1.12-2.60), P =0.01]. The univariable regressions demonstrated a significantly increased OR for increased disability with more severe L4/L5 IVP [OR=1.90 (95% CI 1.04-3.76), P =0.04] and with an increased LVS scale [OR=1.17 (95% CI 1.02-1.35), P =0.02]. IVP severity of the L4/L5 were associated with higher indication for fusion surgery. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis undergoing surgery, the severity of vacuum phenomenon at L4/L5 was associated with greater preoperative back pain and worse Oswestry Disability Index. Patients with severe IVP were more likely to undergo fusion.

Axial T1-weighted imaging of the lumbar spine: a redundancy or an asset?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic value of axial T1-weighted imaging for patients suffering from lower back pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 100 consecutive lumbar spine MRIs obtained in patients with chronic low back pain were reviewed in two sessions: First, readers viewed core sequences (sagittal T1-weighted, STIR and T2-weighted, and axial T2-weighted) with axial T1-weighted sequences, and second, readers viewed cores sequences alone. Readers recorded the presence of disc degeneration, nerve root compromise, facet joint arthritis, and stenosis at each lumbar spine level as well as the presence of lipoma of filum terminale (LFT), spondylolisthesis, transitional vertebrae, and fractures. The McNemar, Wilcoxon signed-rank, and student T tests were utilized. RESULTS: For 100 studies, 5 spine levels were evaluated (L1-L2 through L5-S1). There were cases of disc disease (444/500 bulges, 56/500 herniations), nerve root compromise (1/500 nerve enlargement, 36/500 contact only, 20/500 displacement or compression), facet arthritis (438/500), stenosis (58/500 central canal, 64/500 lateral recess, 137/500 neuroforaminal), 6/100 LFTs, and other abnormalities (58/500 spondylolisthesis, 10/100 transitional vertebrae, 10/500 fracture/spondylolysis). There was no difference in diagnostic performance between the interpretation sessions (with and without axial T1-weighted imaging) at any level (p > 0.05), although four small additional LFTs were identified with axial T1-weighted imaging availability. CONCLUSION: There was no clinically significant difference in the interpretation of lumbar spine MRI viewed with and without axial T1-weighted imaging, suggesting that the axial T1-weighted sequence does not add diagnostic value to routine lumbar spine MRI.

Forearm bone mineral density predicts screw loosening after lumbar fusion similar to lumbar Hounsfield unit value in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Preoperative bone density assessment is necessary to predict screw loosening. The forearm BMD is a useful predictor of BMD-related complications after lumbar operation. Our results show that the forearm BMD is as effective a predictor of screw loosening as the lumbar average HU value. Measurement of the forearm BMD may be a useful adjunct in predicting screw loosening following lumbar fusion. PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between forearm bone mineral density (BMD) and the risk of pedicle screw loosening in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 270 patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis. The patients were divided into two groups on the basis of the with or without loose screws: the loosening group and the non-loosening group. The patient's gender, age, BMI, smoking and diabetes histories, and the operative segment were recorded as the basic information. The Hounsfield unit (HU) value for the BMD of the L1-4 lumbar was measured using computed tomography. The patient's distal one-third of the length of the radius and ulna of the non-dominant forearm was chosen as the site for dual-energy X-ray (DXA) bone density testing. RESULTS: The rate of screw loosening was 13% at a minimum 12 months follow-up. Average forearm BMD (0.461 ± 0.1 vs 0.577 ± 0.1, p < 0.001) and mean HU value (L1-4) (121.1 ± 27.3 vs 155.6 ± 32.2, p < 0.001) were lower in the screw loosening group than those in the non-loosening group. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the forearm BMD (OR 0.840; 95%CI 0.797-0.886) and HU value (L1-4) (OR 0.952; 95%CI 0.935-0.969) were independent risk factor for screw loosening. The area under the curve (AUC) for the forearm BMD and HU value for prediction of pedicle screw loosening was 0.802 and 0.811. The forearm BMD cut-off for predicting pedicle screw loosening was 0.543 (sensitivity, 0.800; specificity, 0.864). CONCLUSIONS: The forearm BMD was an independent risk factor for loosening of the lumbar pedicle screws. The forearm BMD was a valid predictor of pedicle screw loosening in patients undergoing lumbar fusion, as was the CT HU value.