Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 4.411
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 8490, 2024 04 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38605170

RESUMO

Little is known about the therapeutic outcomes of transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) in patients with lumbosacral radicular pain due to lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Using lumbar spine radiographs as input data, we trained a convolutional neural network (CNN) to predict therapeutic outcomes after lumbar TFESI in patients with lumbosacral radicular pain caused by LSS. We retrospectively recruited 193 patients for this study. The lumbar spine radiographs included anteroposterior, lateral, and bilateral (left and right) oblique views. We cut each lumbar spine radiograph image into a square shape that included the vertebra corresponding to the level at which the TFESI was performed and the vertebrae juxta below and above that level. Output data were divided into "favorable outcome" (≥ 50% reduction in the numeric rating scale [NRS] score at 2 months post-TFESI) and "poor outcome" (< 50% reduction in the NRS score at 2 months post-TFESI). Using these input and output data, we developed a CNN model for predicting TFESI outcomes. The area under the curve of our model was 0.920. Its accuracy was 87.2%. Our CNN model has an excellent capacity for predicting therapeutic outcomes after lumbar TFESI in patients with lumbosacral radicular pain induced by LSS.


Assuntos
Radiculopatia , Estenose Espinal , Humanos , Estenose Espinal/complicações , Estenose Espinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose Espinal/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Injeções Epidurais/efeitos adversos , Dor nas Costas/etiologia , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Algoritmos , Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Redes Neurais de Computação , Radiculopatia/etiologia
2.
Eur J Cancer ; 203: 114028, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38652976

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) induce adverse events (irAEs) that do not respond to steroids, i.e. steroid-refractory (sr) irAEs, and irAEs in which steroids cannot be tapered, i.e. steroid-dependent (sd) irAEs, in about 10% of cases. An evidence-based analysis of the effectiveness of second-line immunosuppressive agents with regard to irAE and tumor control is lacking. METHODS: The international web-based Side Effect Registry Immuno-Oncology (SERIO; http://serio-registry.org) is a collaborative initiative with the Paul-Ehrlich-Institute to document rare, severe, complex or therapy-refractory immunotherapy-induced side effects. The registry was queried on August 1, 2023 for cases of irAEs which were treated with second-line therapies. RESULTS: From a total of 1330 cases, 217 patients (16.3%) received 249 second-line therapies. A total of 19 different second-line therapies were employed, including TNF-alpha antagonists (46.5%), intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG; 19.1%), mycophenolate mofetil (15.9%), and methotrexate (3.6%). Therapy choices were determined by the type of irAE. The time to onset of sr-/sd-irAEs after ICI initiation did not consistently differ from steroid-responsive irAEs. While 74.3% of sr-/sd-irAEs resolved and 13.1% had improved, 4.3% persisted, 3.9% resulted in permanent sequelae, and 4.3% in death with ongoing symptoms. Infliximab exhibited potential for earlier symptom improvement compared to mycophenolate mofetil or IVIG. Tumor response in patients with second-line treated sd-/sr-irAE was similar to patients with irAEs treated with steroids only. CONCLUSION: Several second-line therapies are effective against sr-/sd-irAEs, the second-line therapies show no clear negative impact on tumor response, and infliximab shows potential for faster improvement of symptoms. However, prospective comparative data are needed.


Assuntos
Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Neoplasias , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/imunologia , Adulto , Sistema de Registros , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/etiologia
3.
J Immunother Cancer ; 12(4)2024 Apr 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38642938

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Colitis caused by checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) is frequent and is treated with empiric steroids, but CPI colitis mechanisms in steroid-experienced or refractory disease are unclear. METHODS: Using colon biopsies and blood from predominantly steroid-experienced CPI colitis patients, we performed multiplexed single-cell transcriptomics and proteomics to nominate contributing populations. RESULTS: CPI colitis biopsies showed enrichment of CD4+resident memory (RM) T cells in addition to CD8+ RM and cytotoxic CD8+ T cells. Matching T cell receptor (TCR) clonotypes suggested that both RMs are progenitors that yield cytotoxic effectors. Activated, CD38+ HLA-DR+ CD4+ RM and cytotoxic CD8+ T cells were enriched in steroid-experienced and a validation data set of steroid-naïve CPI colitis, underscoring their pathogenic potential across steroid exposure. Distinct from ulcerative colitis, CPI colitis exhibited perturbed stromal metabolism (NAD+, tryptophan) impacting epithelial survival and inflammation. Endothelial cells in CPI colitis after anti-TNF and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (anti-CTLA-4) upregulated the integrin α4ß7 ligand molecular vascular addressin cell adhesion molecule 1 (MAdCAM-1), which may preferentially respond to vedolizumab (anti-α4ß7). CONCLUSIONS: These findings nominate CD4+ RM and MAdCAM-1+ endothelial cells for targeting in specific subsets of CPI colitis patients.


Assuntos
Linfócitos T CD8-Positivos , Colite , Humanos , Células Endoteliais , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral , Colite/induzido quimicamente , Colite/tratamento farmacológico , Linfócitos T CD4-Positivos , Esteroides/farmacologia , Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Células Estromais
6.
Int Ophthalmol ; 44(1): 166, 2024 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38557801

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of various treatment modalities in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) who underwent cataract surgery. METHODS: A comprehensive search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CNKI databases up to December 22, 2021. The safety and efficacy of treatment modalities were assessed using the risk ratio (RR) to compare the progression of DR and the mean difference to evaluate the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and macular thickness (MT). RESULTS: The meta-analysis of the RCTs revealed that anti-VEGF (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor) drugs significantly reduced the progression of DR [RR: 0.37 (95%CI 0.19, 0.70), P = 0.002] and improved BCVA [mean difference = - 0.06 (- 0.12, - 0.01), P = 0.03] in patients with pre-existing DR who underwent cataract surgery. Steroid drugs also showed a significant reduction in macular thickness [mean difference = - 55.63 (- 90.73, - 20.53), I2 = 56%, P = 0.002] in DR patients two weeks after cataract surgery compared to the control group. The safety profiles of different management options did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: The present meta-analysis suggests that anti-VEGF drugs can effectively slow down the progression of diabetic retinopathy, improve BCVA, and reduce MT in DR patients who underwent cataract surgery. Steroid drugs also show promise in reducing MT. However, further studies with larger sample sizes are required to compare the efficacy and safety of different management options in a multi-center clinical setting.


Assuntos
Catarata , Diabetes Mellitus , Retinopatia Diabética , Edema Macular , Humanos , Retinopatia Diabética/complicações , Retinopatia Diabética/tratamento farmacológico , Ranibizumab/uso terapêutico , Bevacizumab/uso terapêutico , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular , Edema Macular/tratamento farmacológico , Esteroides/uso terapêutico
7.
World J Gastroenterol ; 30(15): 2091-2095, 2024 Apr 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38681985

RESUMO

In this editorial we comment on the article by Jaber et al. Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) represents a distinct form of pancreatitis, categorized into AIP-1 and AIP-2, characterized by obstructive jaundice, lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate, and fibrosis. AIP-1, associated with elevated immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) levels, exhibits higher relapse rates, affecting older males, while AIP-2 is less common and linked to inflammatory bowel disease. AIP is considered a manifestation of IgG4-related systemic disease, sharing characteristic histological findings. Steroids are the primary treatment, with emerging biomarkers like interferon alpha and interleukin-33. AIP poses an increased risk of various malignancies, and the association with pancreatic cancer is debated. Surgery is reserved for severe cases, necessitating careful evaluation due to diagnostic challenges. AIP patients may have concurrent PanINs but display favorable long-term outcomes compared to pancreatic cancer patients. Thorough diagnostic assessment, including biopsy and steroid response, is crucial for informed surgical decisions in AIP.


Assuntos
Pancreatite Autoimune , Imunoglobulina G , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Pancreatite Autoimune/diagnóstico , Pancreatite Autoimune/imunologia , Pancreatite Autoimune/terapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/imunologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Imunoglobulina G/imunologia , Pâncreas/patologia , Pâncreas/imunologia , Pâncreas/cirurgia , Biomarcadores/sangue , Biópsia , Masculino , Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 74(3): 524-527, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38591291

RESUMO

Objective: To determine the clinico-pathological features and long-term outcome of secondary steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome treated with steroids and calcineurin inhibitors. METHODS: The retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplant, Karachi, in June and July 2023, and comprised data from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2020, of children aged 1-18 years who developed steroid resistance after initial sensitivity to steroids with at least 1-year of follow-up. Demographics as well as time taken to secondary steroid response were documented. Renal biopsy of all patients with secondary steroid resistance had been performed. Eventual outcomes after treatment with calcineurin inhibitors based on the degree of proteinuria and serum albumin levels were used to categorise complete remission, partial remission and no response. Kidney function, as determined by estimated glomerular filtration rate, was recorded. Data was analysed using SPSS 22. RESULTS: Of the 1,000 patients who underwent renal biopsy for steroid resistance, 48(4.8%) had idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome; 32(66.7%) males, 16(33.3%) females and median age of 5 years (interquartile range: 4-7.3 years). Median age at diagnosis of nephrotic syndrome was 5 years (interquartile range: 3.6-7.3 years). The median time from nephrotic syndrome to secondary steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome was 23 months (interquartile range: 8.75-44.5 months). Biopsy results at diagnosis showed that 27(56.3%) had minimal change disease. The mean follow-up time was 6.1±3.2 years. Of the 43(89.5%) patients who received cyclosporin for 1 year, 29(67%) obtained complete remission, 5(12%) attained partial remission and no response was seen in 9(21%) patients. Conclusion: Majority of the children had minimal change disease at the time of diagnosis of secondary steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. The long-term response with calcineurin inhibitors was favourable at 1 year.


Assuntos
Nefrose Lipoide , Síndrome Nefrótica , Criança , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Pré-Escolar , Síndrome Nefrótica/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome Nefrótica/complicações , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inibidores de Calcineurina/uso terapêutico , Nefrose Lipoide/complicações , Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 28(4): 501-506, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38583902

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become the gold standard in restorative proctocolectomy, surgical techniques have experienced minimal changes. In contrast, substantial shifts in perioperative care, marked by the enhanced recovery program (ERP), modifications in steroid use, and a shift to a 3-staged approach, have taken center stage. METHODS: Data extracted from our prospective IPAA database focused on the first 100 laparoscopic IPAA cases (historic group) and the latest 100 cases (modern group), aiming to measure the effect of these evolutions on postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: The historic IPAA group had more 2-staged procedures (92% proctocolectomy), whereas the modern group had a higher number of 3-staged procedures (86% proctectomy) (P < .001). Compared with patients in the modern group, patients in the historic group were more likely to be on steroids (5% vs 67%, respectively; P < .001) or immunomodulators (0% vs 31%, respectively; P < .001) at surgery. Compared with the historic group, the modern group had a shorter operative time (335.5 ± 78.4 vs 233.8 ± 81.6, respectively; P < .001) and length of stay (LOS; 5.4 ± 3.1 vs 4.2 ± 1.6 days, respectively; P < .001). Compared with the modern group, the historic group exhibited a higher 30-day morbidity rate (20% vs 33%, respectively; P = .04) and an elevated 30-day readmission rate (9% vs 21%, respectively; P = .02). Preoperative steroids use increased complications (odds ratio [OR], 3.4; P = .01), whereas 3-staged IPAA reduced complications (OR, 0.3; P = .03). ERP was identified as a factor that predicted shorter stays. CONCLUSION: Although ERP effectively reduced the LOS in IPAA surgery, it failed to reduce complications. Conversely, adopting a 3-staged IPAA approach proved beneficial in reducing morbidity, whereas preoperative steroid use increased complications.


Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa , Bolsas Cólicas , Laparoscopia , Proctocolectomia Restauradora , Humanos , Proctocolectomia Restauradora/efeitos adversos , Proctocolectomia Restauradora/métodos , Colite Ulcerativa/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos
11.
Cancer Med ; 13(7): e7142, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38545845

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate the use of steroids as antiemetics in clinical trials involving immune checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy. METHODS: Focusing on phase III trials registered before August 2023, it evaluated the consistency of steroid use guidelines. RESULTS: Out of 3452 trials screened, 44 were selected for in-depth review. The findings indicate a considerable variation: 13 trials did not specify the use of antiemetics, while 31 provided criteria for antiemetics, with 13 conforming to local standards, six to international guidelines, and five allowing either. Seven trials recommended effective antiemetics without detailed criteria. This inconsistency led to a range of steroid dosages, with only 11 trials advocating for minimizing or avoiding steroids for antiemetic purposes. CONCLUSION: The research highlights the lack of uniformity in antiemetic steroid use in trials, reflecting diverse clinical practices and underscoring the need for further research to understand the implications on treatment outcomes.


Assuntos
Antieméticos , Humanos , Antieméticos/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Vômito/induzido quimicamente , Vômito/tratamento farmacológico , Vômito/prevenção & controle
12.
Pain Res Manag ; 2024: 1824269, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38528984

RESUMO

Background: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) causes low back pain, leg pain, numbness in the leg, and neurogenic intermittent claudication. Epidural steroid injection (ESI) has been used for treating spinal stenosis symptoms. We hypothesized that dural pulsation was variable for lumbar spinal stenosis. In cases of the presence of dural pulsation, the pain relief after the ESI was better than in the absence of dural pulsation. This study aimed at investigating the relationships between the presence or absence of spinal dural pulsations and the efficacy of ESI. Methods: A total of 71 patients were enrolled in this prospective study. Prior to the ESI, the dural pulsation was measured using a 5-1 MHz array ultrasound transducer. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score was measured pre-ESI and 2 weeks post-ESI and 4 weeks post-ESI. At 4 weeks post-ESI, dural pulsation was rechecked. Results: The VAS scores improved after the ESI procedure regardless of the presence or absence of dural pulsation. There was a correlation between the pulsation of the dura and post-ESI VAS scores. However, VAS was not significantly different for different grades of stenosis. Conclusion: The ESI was effective in patients with spinal stenosis in short-term follow-up. Dural pulsation of the spinal cord was a positive predictive factor for the ESI effect, but the grade of spinal stenosis severity had no effect on the effectiveness of ESI.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica , Dor Lombar , Estenose Espinal , Humanos , Estenose Espinal/complicações , Estenose Espinal/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Prospectivos , Dor nas Costas , Dor Lombar/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Lombar/etiologia , Dor Lombar/diagnóstico , Dor Crônica/complicações , Injeções Epidurais/efeitos adversos , Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
HNO ; 72(4): 231-241, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38472346

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In recent years, significant improvements have been made in the treatment options for uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) refractory to standard medical and surgical therapy. This is the result of a better understanding of the pathophysiology and the resulting development of biologicals for CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). However, biologics are not (yet) available for all patients in Europe. OBJECTIVE: Based on the session "Difficult-to-treat CRS, when biologics are not available" at the 29th Congress of the European Rhinologic Society (ERS) 2023 in Sofia, Bulgaria, the treatment options for uncontrolled CRS with the exclusion of biologics will be discussed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The content of the presentations "Is there a place for antibiotics?" "Indications for revision surgery," "Novel systemic treatment options," "Novel local treatment options," and "Phototherapy for nasal polyps" are outlined and supported by a review of the literature. RESULTS: Various treatment options are available for managing uncontrolled CRS, even if biologic treatments are unavailable. Treatment options for type­2 (T2) CRS include steroid rinses, repeated short-term oral steroids, steroid-eluting stents, and extended sinus surgery. In the case of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD), acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) desensitization can be considered. Non-T2 endotypes or CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP) may benefit from several weeks of macrolides and xylitol rinses. CONCLUSION: To accurately assess the efficacy of second-line therapies for treatment of difficult-to-treat CRS within an endotype-specific framework, additional controlled clinical trials are needed that take into account the heterogeneity of CRS endotypes.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos , Pólipos Nasais , Rinite , Rinossinusite , Sinusite , Humanos , Rinite/diagnóstico , Rinite/terapia , Pólipos Nasais/diagnóstico , Pólipos Nasais/tratamento farmacológico , Sinusite/diagnóstico , Sinusite/tratamento farmacológico , Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Doença Crônica , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico
15.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 26(2): e14260, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38547002

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: As there is no specific antiviral treatment currently available for BK polyomavirus associated nephropathy (BKVAN), its management relies on immunosuppression reduction in kidney transplant patients. Data on efficacy of steroid pulses in this indication are lacking. METHODS: We performed a retrospective monocenter study on 64 patients diagnosed with biopsy-proven BKVAN. Patients within the "pulse group" (n = 37) received IV methylprednisolone 10 mg/kg 3 days consecutively. In the "low dose" steroid group (n = 27), patients were continued oral prednisone 5 mg daily. RESULTS: Mean follow up was 78 months in the steroid pulse group and 56 months in the low dose group (p = 0.15). Mean eGFR values at diagnosis were comparable, as well as other demographic characteristics. Mean BK plasma viral load was higher in "pulse" than in "low dose" steroid group. Pulse group had higher inflammation and tubulitis (p < 0.05). Graft loss reached 57% in the "pulse" group versus 41% in the "low dose" group, p = 0.20. Rejection events were similar. No major adverse event was statistically associated with steroid pulse, including infections, cancer, and de novo diabetes. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were found in the evolution of both groups of patients, despite patients receiving "pulse" steroids were identified as the most severe sharing higher BK viral load and more frequent active lesions on histology.


Assuntos
Vírus BK , Nefropatias , Nefrite Intersticial , Infecções por Polyomavirus , Infecções Tumorais por Vírus , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Nefrite Intersticial/patologia , Aloenxertos/patologia , Inflamação , Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Polyomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções Tumorais por Vírus/diagnóstico , Rejeição de Enxerto/tratamento farmacológico
16.
J Gastroenterol ; 59(5): 389-401, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38492011

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids are recommended only for induction of remission in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). This study aimed to evaluate the change in pharmacologic treatment use, particularly systemic corticosteroids, over approximately 30 years, and the impact of biologics on IBD treatment since their appearance in the 2000s. METHODS: This retrospective study conducted in Japan used data from the Phoenix cohort database (January 1990 to March 2021). Patients with disease onset at age ≥ 10 years who received treatment for UC or CD between January 1990 and March 2021 were included. Outcome measures were change in IBD treatments used, total cumulative corticosteroid doses, initial corticosteroid dose, duration of corticosteroid treatment, and surgery rate. RESULTS: A total of 1066 and 579 patients with UC and CD, respectively, were included. In UC, the rate of corticosteroid use as initial treatment was relatively stable regardless of the year of disease onset; however, in CD, its rate decreased in patients who had disease onset after 2006 (before 2006: 14.3-27.8% vs. after 2006: 6.6-10.5%). Compared with patients with disease onset before biologics became available, cumulative corticosteroid doses in both UC and CD, and the surgery rate in CD only, were lower in those with disease onset after biologics became available. CONCLUSIONS: Since biologics became available, corticosteroid use appears to have decreased, with more appropriate use. Furthermore, use of biologics may reduce surgery rates, particularly in patients with CD. UMIN Clinical Trials Registry; UMIN000035384.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos , Colite Ulcerativa , Doença de Crohn , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Humanos , Criança , Japão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/cirurgia , Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Colite Ulcerativa/cirurgia , Doença de Crohn/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Crohn/cirurgia , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico
17.
Int Immunopharmacol ; 130: 111718, 2024 Mar 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38377859

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rituximab (RTX) has become the first-line treatment for idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN). Compared with conventional therapy, rituximab therapy has a more favorable safety profile. However, the recommended RTX dose as a flux may have its limitations. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of three regimens, including a cyclic corticosteroid-cyclophosphamide regimen and two different doses of RTX regimens, for the treatment of IMN. METHODS: We recruited 58 patients with IMN confirmed by renal biopsy. 20 patients were treated with a cycle regimen, 22 patients were received RTX with 500 mg per week, totaling a dose of 2000 mg (optimized RTX group), and 16 patients received RTX with 1000 mg at day 1 and day 15 (recommended RTX group). Treatment responses, including complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR), and outcome adverse events such as steroid diabetes, infections and a drop in white blood cell count, were compared among the three groups after 9 months of follow-up. RESULTS: At 9-month follow-up, the composite remission rates (CR + PR) were 90 %, 72.7 %, and 75 % for the cycle regimen group, optimized RTX group, and recommended RTX group, respectively, with CR of 35 %, 22.7 %, and 25 %, respectively. There was no statistical difference between the three groups on CR and composite remission. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses showed no significant differences in cumulative CR rates and cumulative composite remission rates among the three groups (P = 0.632, P = 0.258). The cycle regimen group had a higher risk of steroid diabetes (35 %). Compared with the recommended RTX regimen, the optimized regimen reduced the incidence of adverse events of infection (9.1 % vs. 37.5 %, P = 0.049), especially in patients older than 60 years of age (P = 0.026). A lower anti-PLA2R at baseline may be associated with a higher risk of infection (P = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: The efficiency of low-dose and long-course of RTX regiment is not inferior to the recommended treatment regimen, and this regimen can effectively reduce the incidence of infection in patients with IMN. Moreover, we recommend a low-dose, long course of RTX treatment for the elderly.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Glomerulonefrite Membranosa , Humanos , Idoso , Rituximab/efeitos adversos , Glomerulonefrite Membranosa/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamento farmacológico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico
18.
Ann Hematol ; 103(4): 1363-1372, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38393656

RESUMO

Haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) using glucocorticoids for acute graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis (GC-haplo) may become a curative treatment option for nonremission acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This retrospective study aimed to identify pre-HCT predictors of survival in a cohort of 97 nonremission AML treated with GC-haplo in Hyogo Medical University Hospital between 2010 and 2020. Relapse and primary induction failure included in 70 (72%) and 27 (28%) patients, respectively. Sixty-one patients (63%) had undergone previous HCT. Multivariate analysis revealed that ≤ 6 months' duration between first complete remission (CR1) and first relapse (Rel1) (CR1-Rel1 interval) (hazard ratio 2.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-3.89, P = 0.016) and serum albumin before starting the conditioning treatment of ≤ 3.5 g/dL (hazard ratio 1.80, 95%CI 1.09-2.96, P = 0.022) as risk factors for overall survival. Among three groups categorized according to serum albumin and CR1-Rel1 interval, the best 3-year overall survival was observed in patients with albumin > 3.5 g/dL and CR1-Rel1 interval > 6 months or primary induction failure (50.2%, 95%CI 28.9%-68.3%, P < 0.001), revealing that survival could be predicted using albumin and past CR duration in patients with very high-risk AML not in remission before GC-haplo.


Assuntos
Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Humanos , Transplante Haploidêntico/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Indução de Remissão , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/etiologia , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/prevenção & controle , Recidiva , Albumina Sérica , Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante
19.
Expert Rev Clin Immunol ; 20(4): 339-348, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38379258

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal Photopheresis (ECP) may be considered the unique large-scale cell therapy currently available. It is currently employed mainly as second-line treatment, especially in steroid-resistant or steroid-dependent Graft versus Host Disease (GvHD) with good results and very few limitations. AREAS COVERED: Many points need to be clarified regarding the ECP mechanism of action, that conditions the lack of uniqueness among the different centers, essentially cycle frequency, treatment duration, and the number of cells to be treated to obtain a response, according to the organs involved. Moreover, reliable biomarkers for prediction of response are lacking, as well as the best pharmacological combination. We will focus on the recent advances concerning ECP for GvHD treatment. We performed a systematic literature research in Pubmed and Embase as of September 2023. EXPERT OPINION: The recent studies on ECP mechanism of action along with the promising biomarkers of response, and the synergistic benefit of ECP in association with the new drugs render this therapy an important weapon for GvHD resistant to conventional treatment and can be proposed as a valid first-line therapy option with promising results. We believe that it should be used early in all categories of patients, considering its high safety profile.


Assuntos
Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Fotoferese , Humanos , Fotoferese/métodos , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/tratamento farmacológico , Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores
20.
BMC Med ; 22(1): 85, 2024 Feb 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38413930

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: For patients with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGVHD), effective second-line regimens are urgently needed. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have been used as salvage regimens for SR-aGVHD in the past. However, clinical trials and an overall understanding of the molecular mechanisms of MSCs combined with basiliximab for SR-aGVHD are limited, especially in haploidentical haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HID HSCT). METHODS: The primary endpoint of this multicentre, randomized, controlled trial was the 4-week complete response (CR) rate of SR-aGVHD. A total of 130 patients with SR-aGVHD were assigned in a 1:1 randomization schedule to the MSC group (receiving basiliximab plus MSCs) or control group (receiving basiliximab alone) (NCT04738981). RESULTS: Most enrolled patients (96.2%) received HID HSCT. The 4-week CR rate of SR-aGVHD in the MSC group was obviously better than that in the control group (83.1% vs. 55.4%, P = 0.001). However, for the overall response rates at week 4, the two groups were comparable. More patients in the control group used ≥ 6 doses of basiliximab (4.6% vs. 20%, P = 0.008). We collected blood samples from 19 consecutive patients and evaluated MSC-derived immunosuppressive cytokines, including HO1, GAL1, GAL9, TNFIA6, PGE2, PDL1, TGF-ß and HGF. Compared to the levels before MSC infusion, the HO1 (P = 0.0072) and TGF-ß (P = 0.0243) levels increased significantly 1 day after MSC infusion. At 7 days after MSC infusion, the levels of HO1, GAL1, TNFIA6 and TGF-ß tended to increase; however, the differences were not statistically significant. Although the 52-week cumulative incidence of cGVHD in the MSC group was comparable to that in the control group, fewer patients in the MSC group developed cGVHD involving ≥3 organs (14.3% vs. 43.6%, P = 0.006). MSCs were well tolerated, no infusion-related adverse events (AEs) occurred and other AEs were also comparable between the two groups. However, patients with malignant haematological diseases in the MSC group had a higher 52-week disease-free survival rate than those in the control group (84.8% vs. 65.9%, P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: For SR-aGVHD after allo-HSCT, especially HID HSCT, the combination of MSCs and basiliximab as the second-line therapy led to significantly better 4-week CR rates than basiliximab alone. The addition of MSCs not only did not increase toxicity but also provided a survival benefit.


Assuntos
Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Transplante de Células-Tronco Mesenquimais , Células-Tronco Mesenquimais , Humanos , Basiliximab/uso terapêutico , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/tratamento farmacológico , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Fator de Crescimento Transformador beta/uso terapêutico , Doença Aguda , Transplante de Células-Tronco Mesenquimais/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA