Vagus nerve stimulation alleviates cardiac dysfunction and inflammatory markers during heart failure in rats.

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is under clinical investigation as a therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This study aimed to investigate its therapeutic effects on three main components of heart failure: cardiac function, cardiac remodeling and central neuroinflammation using a pressure overload (PO) rat model. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into four groups: PO, PO + VNS, PO + VNS sham, and controls. All rats, except controls, underwent a PO surgery to constrict the thoracic aorta (~50 %) to induce HFrEF. Open loop VNS therapy was continuously administered to PO + VNS rats at 20 Hz, 1.0 mA for 60 days. Evaluation of cardiac function and structure via echocardiograms showed decreases in stroke volume and relative ejection fraction and increases in the internal diameter of the left ventricle during systole and diastole in PO rats (p < 0.05). However, these PO-induced adverse changes were alleviated with VNS therapy. Additionally, PO rats exhibited significant increases in myocyte cross sectional areas indicating hypertrophy, along with significant increases in myocardial fibrosis and apoptosis, all of which were reversed by VNS therapy (p < 0.05). Furthermore, VNS mitigated microglial activation in two central autonomic nuclei: the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus and locus coeruleus. These findings demonstrate that when VNS therapy is initiated at an early stage of HFrEF progression (<10 % reduction in relative ejection fraction), the supplementation of vagal activity is effective in restoring multi organ homeostasis in a PO model.

Implantation Surgery for Abdominal Vagus Nerve Stimulation and Recording Studies in Awake Rats.

Abdominal vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) can be applied to the subdiaphragmatic branch of the vagus nerve of rats. Due to its anatomical location, it does not have any respiratory and cardiac off-target effects commonly associated with cervical VNS. The lack of respiratory and cardiac off-target effects means that the intensity of stimulation does not need to be lowered to reduce side effects commonly experienced during cervical VNS. Few recent studies demonstrate the anti-inflammatory effects of abdominal VNS in rat models of inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and glycemia reduction in a rat model of type 2 diabetes. Rat is a great model to explore the potential of this technology because of the well-established anatomy of the vagus nerve, the large size of the nerve that allows easy handling, and the availability of many disease models. Here, we describe the methods for cleaning and sterilizing the abdominal VNS electrode array and surgical protocol in rats. We also describe the technology required for confirmation of suprathreshold stimulation by recording evoked compound action potentials. Abdominal VNS has the potential to offer selective, effective treatment for a variety of conditions, including inflammatory diseases, and the application is expected to expand similarly to cervical VNS.

No consistent evidence for the anti-inflammatory effect of vagus nerve stimulation in humans: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been identified as an innovative immunosuppressive treatment strategy in rodent studies. However, its' clinical potential is still unclear. Therefore, we aimed to assess whether VNS can reduce inflammatory proteins and/or immune cells in humans, through a pre-registered systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA guidelines. The databases Cochrane, Pubmed and World of Knowledge were searched in duplicate up to the 3rd of March 2022 and publications from identified clinical trial registrations were identified until 20th of August 2023. Studies were included if they provided peer-reviewed data for humans who received VNS as short-term (<=1 day) or long-term (>=2 days-365 days) stimulation and reported at least one cytokine or immune cell after treatment.Screening of title, abstract, full text, and data extraction was performed in duplicate by two independent reviewers. Data were pooled using a random-effects model and meta-regression was performed for moderating factors. Reporting bias was assessed. The standardized mean difference (Hedge's g) was used to indicate overall differences of cytokine data (mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range at the study level) to test our a-priori hypothesis. The systematic review of 36 studies with 1135 participants (355 receiving a control/sham condition and 780 receiving VNS) revealed anti-inflammatory effects of VNS for cytokines in several reports, albeit often in subgroup analyses, but our meta-analyses of 26 studies did not confirm these findings. Although most cytokines were numerically reduced, the reduction did not reach statistical significance after VNS: not in the between-group comparisons (short-term: TNF-α: g = -0.21, p = 0.359; IL-6: g = -0.94, p = 0.112; long-term: TNF-α: g = -0.13, p = 0.196; IL-6: g = -0.67, p = 0.306); nor in the within-study designs (short-term: TNF-α: g = -0.45, p = 0.630; IL-6: g = 0.28, p = 0.840; TNF-α: g = -0.53, p = 0.297; IL-6:g = -0.02, p = 0.954). Only the subgroup analysis of 4 long-term studies with acute inflammation was significant: VNS decreased CRP significantly more than sham stimulation. Additional subgroup analyses including stimulation duration, stimulation method (invasive/non-invasive), immune stimulation, and study quality did not alter results. However, heterogeneity was high, and most studies had poor to fair quality. Given the low number of studies for each disease, a disease-specific analysis was not possible. In conclusion, while numeric effects were reported in individual studies, the current evidence does not substantiate the claim that VNS impacts inflammatory cytokines in humans. However, it may be beneficial during acute inflammatory events. To assess its full potential, high-quality studies and technological advances are required.

Efficacy of transauricular vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced painful peripheral neuropathy: a randomized controlled exploratory study.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced painful peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common adverse event in cancer patients, and there is still a lack of effective treatment. Transauricular vagal nerve stimulation (taVNS) is a minimally invasive treatment, but there are few reports regarding its efficacy for CIPN. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and possible mechanism of taVNS in patients with CIPN. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with CIPN were randomly divided into a taVNS group (n = 14) and a sham stimulation (SS) group (n = 13). A numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain, NCICTCAE 4.0 (neurotoxicity classification), quantitative sensory test (QST), Short-Form-Health Survey-12 (SF-12), and Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) were administered before the intervention (D-10) and on the day after the intervention (D0), and the inflammatory cytokines in plasma were also measured. The NRS, NCI-CTCAE 4.0, SF-12, and AIS were administered again at D30 and D90. RESULTS: Compared with the SS group, the NRS and AIS in the taVNS group were significantly lower at D0. The impact lasted until D30. There were no statistically significant differences in the NRS and AIS between the 2 groups at D90. On D30, the mental component score of the SF-12 was significantly higher in the taVNS group than in the SS group. No adverse events were found. There was no significant difference in QST and plasma inflammatory cytokines between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: taVNS can relieve chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain in the short term, can improve sleep status and quality of life, and is expected to become a novel clinical treatment method for CIPN.

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation therapy in patients with cognitively preserved structural focal epilepsy: A case series report.

OBJECTIVE: Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) was performed in two patients suffering structural focal epilepsy with preserved intellectual ability to show the feasibility of taVNS for specific patient groups. CASE PRESENTATIONS: Patient 1 was a 24-year-old woman with frontal lobe epilepsy who had weekly hyperkinetic seizures despite multiple anti-seizure medications. Patient 2 was a 27-year-old woman with parietal lobe epilepsy and focal cortical dysplasia in the vicinity of the lipoma in the corpus callosum. She experienced weekly focal-impaired awareness seizures even with anti-seizure medication. taVNS was applied to the left earlobe of both patients at 1.5 mA, 25 Hz, 250 µs pulse width, and 30 s stimulation with 30 s rest for 4 h per day. Over an 8-week baseline and 20 weeks of stimulation, the rate of reduction in seizure frequency was evaluated, along with quality-of-life using the Short-Form 36-Item Health survey. RESULTS: At baseline, we measured up to 11 and 12 focal seizures per week in Patient 1 and 2, respectively, with both patients achieving seizure freedom after 4 and 20 weeks taVNS, respectively. Patient 1 and 2 were observed for 18 and 14 months, respectively, including the clinical trial and follow-up observation period. Quality-of-life ratings increased in both patients, and no significant adverse events occurred during the study period. During the maintenance period after 20 weeks, seizures remained absent in Patient 1, and seizures remained reduced in Patient 2. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that taVNS may be a promising tool for structural focal epilepsy with preserved cognitive function. A multicenter double-blind clinical trial is needed to confirm the role of taVNS as an anti-seizure tool.

Clinical Perspective: EEG-Based Neuromodulation Technique for Epilepsy.

Epilepsy is the most common brain disorder around the world. The main treatments of epilepsy are through drug treatment or epilepsy surgery. However, examples of EEG-based neuromodulation treatments, such as Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS), and responsive neuro-stimulation (RNS), are also promising therapeutic methods nowadays. The aim of the paper is to recognize the effectiveness and potential risks of the three techniques. By carrying out randomized multicenter double-blind trials, this research studied the effectiveness of VNS, RNS, and DBS by measuring the median seizure reduction rate, rate of the responder, and proportion of seizure-free patients; the sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) of the treated patients; and the possible side effects that each treatment may cause. This review paper discusses the classification of epilepsy, common treatment methods for epilepsy, previous studies related to the three techniques, and data collected from the randomized multicenter double-blind trials. All in all, the result suggested that for short-term treatment, DBS may be the most effective method, but for long-term treatment, RNS may be more recommended. As the SUDEP rates for all three methods are lower than the SUDEP rate for epilepsy surgery, EEG-based neuromodulation techniques may become the main treatment for epilepsy in the future.

Benefits of vagus nerve stimulation on psychomotor functions in patients with severe drug-resistant epilepsy.

PURPOSE: Patients with severe drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) experience psychomotor disorders. Our study aimed to assess the psychomotor outcomes after vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in this population. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated psychomotor function in 17 adult patients with severe DRE who were referred for VNS. Psychomotor functions were examined, in the preoperative period and at 18 months post-surgery, by a psychomotor therapist using a full set of the following specific tests: the Rey-Osterrieth complex figure (ROCF) test, the Zazzo's cancelation task (ZCT), the Piaget-Head test and the paired images test. RESULTS: At 18 months post-VNS surgery, the Piaget-head scores increased by 3 points (p = 0.008) compared to baseline. Performances were also improved for ROCF test both in copy (+2.4 points, p = 0.001) and recall (+2.0 points, p = 0.008) tasks and for the paired images test (accuracy index: +28.6 %, p = 0.03). Regarding the ZCT findings, the efficiency index increased in both single (+16 %, p = 0.005) and dual (+17.1 %, p < 0.001) tasks. QoL improved in 88.2 % of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe DRE treated with VNS experienced improved performance in terms of global psychomotor functions. Perceptual organization, visuospatial memory, laterality awareness, sustained attention, concentration, visual scanning, and inhibition were significantly improved.

Aesthetic transaxillary subpectoral placement of vagus nerve stimulator in children and young adults: A technical note.

INTRODUCTION: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a neuromodulation therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), refractory status epilepticus, and treatment-resistant depression. The lead is tunneled into the subcutaneous space and connected to the generator, which is usually implanted in a subcutaneous pocket below the clavicle. Surgical complications in the chest region include skin breakdown or infection. An alternative approach is to perform a subclavear subpectoral implantation. In our surgical series, we report a new aesthetic implantation method for VNS generators in children and young patients: the transaxillary subpectoral placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From May 2021 to May 2023, 10 vagus nerve stimulation generators were placed subpectorally with a transaxillary approach by the authors. We considered operative time, surgical complications such as blood loss, infections, device migration, pain, and adverse events at follow-up. RESULTS: In this surgical series, we reviewed all cases of subpectoral implantation of VNS generators in children and young adults at our institution in the last 2 years. All patients were treated with subpectoral Sentiva 1000 (Livanova PLC) insertion with axillary access by a neurosurgeon and a pediatric surgeon. The operative time was slightly longer compared to the traditional subcutaneous implant. All generators reported impedances within the optimal range. Blood loss was not significant and no other perioperative complications were reported. Patients and families were highly satisfied with the outcomes in terms of comfort and aesthetic results after surgery and at the last follow-up. No cases of infection occurred, and no malfunctions or displacements of the generator were registered at clinical follow-up. CONCLUSION: The transaxillary subpectoral placement of theVNS generator is an aesthetic and anatomic approach, which provides several benefits to children and young adults.

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation as a potential novel treatment for polycystic ovary syndrome.

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine disorder in women of childbearing age. The etiology of PCOS is multifactorial, and current treatments for PCOS are far from satisfactory. Recently, an imbalanced autonomic nervous system (ANS) with sympathetic hyperactivity and reduced parasympathetic nerve activity (vagal tone) has aroused increasing attention in the pathogenesis of PCOS. In this paper, we review an innovative therapy for the treatment of PCOS and related co-morbidities by targeting parasympathetic modulation based on non-invasive transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation (ta-VNS). In this work, we present the role of the ANS in the development of PCOS and describe a large number of experimental and clinical reports that support the favorable effects of VNS/ta-VNS in treating a variety of symptoms, including obesity, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes mellitus, inflammation, microbiome dysregulation, cardiovascular disease, and depression, all of which are also commonly present in PCOS patients. We propose a model focusing on ta-VNS that may treat PCOS by (1) regulating energy metabolism via bidirectional vagal signaling; (2) reversing insulin resistance via its antidiabetic effect; (3) activating anti-inflammatory pathways; (4) restoring homeostasis of the microbiota-gut-brain axis; (5) restoring the sympatho-vagal balance to improve CVD outcomes; (6) and modulating mental disorders. ta-VNS is a safe clinical procedure and it might be a promising new treatment approach for PCOS, or at least a supplementary treatment for current therapeutics.

Single-center long-term results of vagus nerve stimulation for pediatric epilepsy: a 10-17-year follow-up study.

PURPOSE: A retrospective study, based on a prospectively built database, presents the results of long-term follow-up care of pediatric vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) patients in terms of seizure outcome, surgical aspects, the potential impact of maturation, and medication changes. METHODS: From a prospectively built database, 16 VNS patients (median age 12.0 years, range 6.0 to 16.0 years; median seizure duration 6.5 years, range 2.0 to 15.5 years) followed for at least 10 years were graded as non-responder - NR (seizure frequency reduction < 50%), responder - R (reduction ≥ 50% and < 80%), and 80% responder - 80R (reduction ≥ 80%). Data about surgical aspects (battery replacement, system complications), seizure dynamics, and medication changes were taken from the database. RESULTS: The early percentages of good results (80R + R) were 43.8% (year 1), 50.0% (year 2), and 43.8% (year 3). These percentages remained stable between years 10 and 12 (50% year 10; 46.7% year 11; 50% year 12) and increased in years 16 (60%) and 17 (75%). Depleted batteries were replaced in ten patients, six of whom were either R or 80R. In the four NR, the indication for replacement was improved quality of life. Three patients had VNS explanted or switched off-one had repeated asystolia and two were NR. The effect of hormonal changes in menarche on seizure was not proven. During the study, antiseizure medication was changed in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: The study proved the efficacy and safety of VNS in pediatric patients over an exceptionally long follow-up period. The demand for battery replacements indicates a positive treatment effect.

Neuro-stimulation in focal epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Different neurostimulation modalities are available to treat drug-resistant focal epilepsy when surgery is not an option including vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), and deep brain stimulation (DBS). Head-to-head comparisons of efficacy do not exist between them nor are likely to be available in the future. We performed a meta-analysis on VNS, RNS, and DBS outcomes to compare seizure reduction efficacy for focal epilepsy. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the literature for reported seizure outcomes following implantation with VNS, RNS, and DBS in focal-onset seizures and performed a meta-analysis. Prospective or retrospective clinical studies were included. RESULTS: Sufficient data were available at years one (n = 642, two (n = 480), and three (n = 385) for comparing the three modalities with each other. Seizure reduction for the devices at years one, two, and three respectively were: RNS: 66.3%, 56.0%, 68.4%; DBS- 58.4%, 57.5%, 63.8%; VNS 32.9%, 44.4%, 53.5%. Seizure reduction at year one was greater for RNS (p < 0.01) and DBS (p < 0.01) compared to VNS. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate the seizure reduction efficacy of RNS is similar to DBS, and both had greater seizure reductions compared to VNS in the first-year post-implantation, with the differences diminishing with longer-term follow-up. SIGNIFICANCE: The results help guide neuromodulation treatment in eligible patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

Training and teaching of vagus nerve stimulation surgery: Worldwide survey and future perspectives.

OBJECTIVE: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy has been used for more than two decades to treat drug resistant epilepsy and depression and most recently received FDA approval for stroke rehabilitation. Expanding indications will renew the interest in the technique and increase the number of surgeons to be trained. The aim of this study was to survey surgeons with substantial expertise on optimal teaching and training approaches. METHODS: Anonymous forms comprising 16 questions were sent by e-mail to surgeons with substantial expertise. Statistical analyses were used to compare the answers of the most experienced surgeons (>5 years) with the less experienced ones (<5 years). RESULTS: Fully-completed forms were collected from 57 experts from 20 countries. The placement of the helical coils was deemed to be the most difficult step by 36 (63.2%) experts, and the use of optical magnification during this step was deemed necessary by 39 (68.4%) experts. Vocal cord palsy should be largely avoidable with proper surgical technique according to 44 (77.2%) experts. The teaching tool considered the most useful was mentoring (38, 66.7%). The future of VNS surgery teaching was deemed to be in anatomical workshops (29, 50.9%) and surgical simulation (26, 45.6%). Overall, answers did not vary significantly according to experience. CONCLUSIONS: VNS surgery should be mastered by actively participating in dedicated practical training courses and by individual mentoring during actual surgery, which is still the best way to learn. This study highlights the need for a formal training course and possible specific accreditation.

Anti-inflammatory effects of vagus nerve stimulation in pediatric patients with epilepsy.

Introduction: The neural control of the immune system by the nervous system is critical to maintaining immune homeostasis, whose disruption may be an underlying cause of several diseases, including cancer, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and Alzheimer's disease. Methods: Here we studied the role of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Vagus nerve stimulation is widely used as an alternative treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy. Thus, we studied the impact that VNS treatment has on PBMCs isolated from a cohort of existing patients with medically refractory epilepsy. A comparison of genome-wide changes in gene expression was made between the epilepsy patients treated and non-treated with vagus nerve stimulation. Results: The analysis showed downregulation of genes related to stress, inflammatory response, and immunity, suggesting an anti-inflammatory effect of VNS in epilepsy patients. VNS also resulted in the downregulation of the insulin catabolic process, which may reduce circulating blood glucose. Discussion: These results provide a potential molecular explanation for the beneficial role of the ketogenic diet, which also controls blood glucose, in treating refractory epilepsy. The findings indicate that direct VNS might be a useful therapeutic alternative to treat chronic inflammatory conditions.

Pediatric Vagus Nerve Stimulation: Case Series Outcomes and Future Directions.

BACKGROUND: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a neuromodulatory procedure most extensively studied as an adjunct to medically refractory epilepsy. Despite widespread adoption and decades of clinical experience, clinical predictors of response to VNS remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a retrospective cohort of pediatric patients undergoing VNS at our institution to better understand who may benefit from VNS and identify factors which may predict response to VNS. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study examining pediatric patients undergoing VNS over nearly a 20-year span at a single institution. Presurgical evaluation, including demographics, clinical history, and diagnostic electroencephalogram, and imaging findings were examined. Primary outcomes included VNS response. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-seven subjects were studied. The mean age at surgery was 10.1 (SD = 4.9, range = 0.8-25.3) years; length of follow-up was a mean of 4.6 years (SD = 3.5, median = 3.9 years, range 1 day-16.1 years). There was no association between demographic factors, epilepsy etiology, or genetic basis and VNS outcomes. There was an association between reduction in main seizure type with positive MRI finding. Of all MRI findings analyzed, brain atrophy was significantly associated with worse VNS outcomes, whereas dysplastic hippocampus and chronic periventricular leukomalacia findings were found to be associated with improved outcomes. Increased seizure semiology variability and seizure type were also associated with improved seizure outcomes. CONCLUSION: Predicting response to VNS remains difficult, leading to incompletely realized benefits and suboptimal resource utilization. Specific MRI findings and increased seizure semiology variability and type can help guide clinical decision making and patient counseling.

Laryngology Outcomes Following Implantable Vagus Nerve Stimulation.

Importance: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) devices have gained widespread acceptance for treatment of resistant epilepsy and depression. The increasing number of procedures has resulted in an increasing number of iatrogenic injuries to the vagus nerve, which can have a significant effect on vocalization and quality of life. Objective: To determine the relative frequency of laryngeal adverse effects reported to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) after VNS implantation and to analyze associated VNS device problems. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cross-sectional analysis queried the FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database of adverse events in the US between 1996 and 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the percent of adverse events reported to the FDA that included patients who received VNS with laryngeal adverse effects and the associated proportion of device problems after VNS surgery. Results: A total of 12 725 iatrogenic vagus nerve issues were documented after VNS implantation, with apnea (n = 395; 3.1%) being the most common patient problem. Overall, 187 reports of laryngeal adverse effects associated with VNS devices were identified and represented the eighth most common iatrogenic vagus nerve problem reported to the FDA. Laryngeal adverse effects included 78 reports of voice alteration and 57 reports of paresis/paralysis. The VNS device problems frequently associated with laryngeal adverse effects were high impedance (n = 15, 8.02%), incorrect frequency delivery (n = 10, 5.35%), and battery problems (n = 11, 5.88%). The number of laryngeal adverse effect reports per year peaked in 2012 with 43 cases. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study found that although the literature demonstrates that vocal changes occur with nearly all VNS devices, the FDA receives adverse event reports of voice changes. Our results emphasize a potential need to improve patient counseling prior to VNS surgery to better set patient expectations regarding vocal changes and to prevent unnecessary patient concern. In addition, reports of vocal fold paresis/paralysis potentially suggest that patients may benefit from preoperative laryngeal assessment to differentiate preexisting vocal fold paralysis from that caused by VNS surgery.

Vagus nerve stimulator revision in pediatric epilepsy patients: a technical note and case series.

INTRODUCTION: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an adjunctive treatment in children with intractable epilepsy. When lead replacement becomes necessary, the old leads are often truncated and retained and new leads are implanted at a newly exposed segment of the nerve. Direct lead removal and replacement are infrequently described, with outcomes poorly characterized. We aimed to describe our experience with feasibility of VNS lead removal and replacement in pediatric patients. METHODS: Retrospective review examined 14 patients, at a single, tertiary-care, children's hospital, who underwent surgery to replace VNS leads, with complete removal of the existing lead from the vagus nerve and placement of a new lead on the same segment of the vagus nerve, via blunt and sharp dissection without use of electrocautery. Preoperative characteristics, stimulation parameters, and outcomes were collected. RESULTS: Mean age at initial VNS placement was 7.6 years (SD 3.5, range 4.5-13.4). Most common etiologies of epilepsy were genetic (5, 36%) and cryptogenic (4, 29%). Lead replacement was performed at a mean of 6.0 years (SD 3.8, range 2.1-11.7) following initial VNS placement. Reasons for revision included VNS lead breakage or malfunction. There were no perioperative complications, including surgical site infection, voice changes, dysphagia, or new deficits postoperatively. Stimulation parameters after replacement surgery at last follow-up were similar compared to preoperatively, with final stimulation parameters ranging from 0.25 mA higher to 1.5 mA lower to maintain baseline seizure control. The mean length of follow-up was 7.9 years (SD 3.5, range 3.1-13.7). CONCLUSION: Removal and replacement of VNS leads are feasible and can be safely performed in children. Further characterization of surgical technique, associated risk, impact on stimulation parameters, and long-term outcomes are needed to inform best practices in VNS revision.

Low-intensity transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation reduces postoperative ileus after laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative ileus (POI) is thought to result from a disrupted sympathetic/parasympathetic balance caused by trauma or surgery. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) is a non-invasive technique involving stimulation of the vagal auricular branch, leading to autonomic regulation and reduced inflammation. Here, the effects of low-intensity transcutaneous auricular vagal stimulation on POI after laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer were investigated. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-four patients who received scheduled laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer were randomly allocated to the A and B groups. The A group received low-intensity (25 Hz, 50 mA) transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the right auricular branch for 20 minutes prior to anesthesia while the B group did not. The primary outcome was the incidence of POI. RESULTS: The incidence of POI in the A group was 6.25% and 20% in the B group (P=0.022). Patients in the A group showed more regular bowel sounds after 24, 36, and 48 h than those in the B group (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Low-intensity transcutaneous auricular vagal stimulation reduced POI after laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer.

Vagus Nerve Stimulation: A Personalized Therapeutic Approach for Crohn's and Other Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

Inflammatory bowel diseases, including Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, are incurable autoimmune diseases characterized by chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. There is increasing evidence that inappropriate interaction between the enteric nervous system and central nervous system and/or low activity of the vagus nerve, which connects the enteric and central nervous systems, could play a crucial role in their pathogenesis. Therefore, it has been suggested that appropriate neuroprosthetic stimulation of the vagus nerve could lead to the modulation of the inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract and consequent long-term control of these autoimmune diseases. In the present paper, we provide a comprehensive overview of (1) the cellular and molecular bases of the immune system, (2) the way central and enteric nervous systems interact and contribute to the immune responses, (3) the pathogenesis of the inflammatory bowel disease, and (4) the therapeutic use of vagus nerve stimulation, and in particular, the transcutaneous stimulation of the auricular branch of the vagus nerve. Then, we expose the working hypotheses for the modulation of the molecular processes that are responsible for intestinal inflammation in autoimmune diseases and the way we could develop personalized neuroprosthetic therapeutic devices and procedures in favor of the patients.

PSpice modeling of cervical and site-focused vagus nerve ultrasonic stimulation for reduced tumor necrosis factor-α production.

Clinical ultrasound is widely used as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool. Recently, it has been used to perform neuromodulation to treat diverse effects, including inflammation reduction through the vagus nerve. Although the mechanism by which ultrasound propagates through tissue for diagnostic purposes has been established, there is not a complete understanding of how it interacts with neurons to elicit excitation and inhibit inflammation. This work presents a novel technique based on a well-established electrical engineering tool, PSpice, to model cervical and site-focused vagus nerve ultrasonic stimulation to understand its capability in reducing tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) production in the spleen. Transmission line theory is utilized as the basis for the different tissue layers. The models supported the hypothesis that site-focused stimulation has the advantage to decrease undesired efferent effects that would otherwise occur with cervical stimulation. Two different acoustic pressures, 0.25 and 0.83 MPa, were simulated for theoretical efficacy and safety based on previous experimental work conducted by others. The 0.25 MPa simulation was ideal for neurostimulation and reduction of TNF-α, while 0.83 MPa resulted in much higher intensity levels that will most likely induce additional inflammation.