The Damage Control Surgery in Austere Environments Research Group (DCSAERG): A dynamic program to facilitate real-time telementoring/telediagnosis to address exsanguination in extreme and austere environments.

Hemorrhage is the most preventable cause of posttraumatic death. Many cases are potentially anatomically salvageable, yet remain lethal without logistics or trained personnel to deliver diagnosis or resuscitative surgery in austere environments. Revolutions in technology for remote mentoring of ultrasound and surgery may enhance capabilities to utilize the skill sets of non-physicians. Thus, our research collaborative explored remote mentoring to empower non-physicians to address junctional and torso hemorrhage control in austere environments. Major studies involved using remote-telementored ultrasound (RTMUS) to identify torso and junctional exsanguination, remotely mentoring resuscitative surgery for torso hemorrhage control, understanding and mitigating physiological stress during such tasks, and the technical practicalities of conducting damage control surgery (DCS) in austere environments. Iterative projects involved randomized guiding of firefighters to identify torso (RCT) and junctional (pilot) hemorrhage using RTMUS, randomized remote mentoring of MedTechs conducting resuscitative surgery for torso exsanguination in an anatomically realistic surgical trainer ("Cut Suit") including physiological monitoring, and trained surgeons conducting a comparative randomized study for torso hemorrhage control in normal (1g) versus weightlessness (0g). This work demonstrated that firefighters could be remotely mentored to perform just-in-time torso RTMUS on a simulator. Both firefighters and mentors were confident in their abilities, the ultrasounds being 97% accurate. An ultrasound-naive firefighter in Memphis could also be remotely mentored from Hawaii to identify and subsequently tamponade an arterial junctional hemorrhage using RTMUS in a live tissue model. Thereafter, both mentored and unmentored MedTechs and trained surgeons completed resuscitative surgery for hemorrhage control on the Cut-Suit, demonstrating practicality for all involved. While remote mentoring did not decrease blood loss among MedTechs, it increased procedural confidence and decreased physiologic stress. Therefore, remote mentoring may increase the feasibility of non-physicians conducting a psychologically daunting task. Finally, DCS in weightlessness was feasible without fundamental differences from 1g. Overall, the collective evidence suggests that remote mentoring supports diagnosis, noninvasive therapy, and ultimately resuscitative surgery to potentially rescue those exsanguinating in austere environments and should be more rigorously studied.

In vivo assessment of the Combat Ready Clamp to control junctional hemorrhage in swine.

BACKGROUND: Junctional wounds and associated hemorrhage have become more common and more lethal in the current war. The Combat Ready Clamp (CRoC) has been developed and deployed for treating junctional hemorrhage on the battlefield. This study examined the efficacy of CRoC and its acute effects in an animal model. METHODS: Anesthetized pigs (n = 6) were subjected to laparotomy, splenectomy, and abdominal closure. Next, coagulopathy was induced in animals by hemodilution and hypothermia. The left femoral artery was isolated, punctured (6-mm hole), and allowed to bleed for 15 seconds. The groin wound was packed with gauze, and a CRoC applied and tightened until hemorrhage stopped. It was kept in place for 1 hour (treatment period) and then released for another hour or less (control-period) if animal exsanguinated. Fluid resuscitation was administered, and vascular blood flow was examined by Doppler and CT scans. After death, local tissues were collected for histology. RESULTS: CRoC generated 800 to 900 mm Hg pressure on the wounds, which stopped the hemorrhage and prevented rebleeding during the first hour in all animals. Blood loss was minimal (≤137 mL), and mean arterial pressure remained at or higher than the target level (65 mm Hg) during this period. Removal of the clamp promptly led to rebleeding and exsanguination of five of six pigs during the second hour despite fluid resuscitation. Blood loss, survival, shock indices, and other measures were significantly (p < 0.01) different between the two periods. Doppler tests and CT scans showed no blood flow in the proximal, distal, and collateral arteries of the clamped leg. Minor inflammation was seen on blood vessels (endothelium) and nerves. CONCLUSION: CRoC functioned as an effective hemostatic adjunct for compression and control of groin hemorrhage. Although no acute histological damages were seen in compressed tissues, the short- and long-term effects of CRoC application (e.g., total ischemia) on limb function remain unknown and warrant investigation.