Risk Factors for Contrast Media Extravasation in Intravenous Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography: An Observational Cohort Study.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To identify the risk factors for contrast media (CM) extravasation and provide effective guidance for reducing its incidence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We observed adult inpatients (n = 38 281) who underwent intravenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022. Risk factors for CM extravasation were evaluated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Among the 38 281 inpatients who underwent enhanced computed tomography angiography, 3885 received peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) and 34 396 received peripheral short catheters. In 3885 cases of PICCs, no CM extravasation occurred, but in five cases, ordinary PICCs that are unable to withstand high pressure were mistakenly used; three of those patients experienced catheter rupture, and eventually, all five patients underwent unplanned extubation. Among 34 396 cases of peripheral short catheters, 224 (0.65%) had CM extravasation. Female sex (odds ratio [OR]=1.541, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.111-2.137), diabetes (OR=2.265, 95% CI: 1.549-3.314), venous thrombosis (OR=2.157, 95% CI: 1.039-4.478), multi-site angiography (OR=9.757, CI: 6.803-13.994), and injection rate ≥ 3 mL/s (OR=6.073, 95% CI: 4.349-8.481) were independent risk factors for CM extravasation. Due to peripheral vascular protection measures in patients with malignant tumor, there was a low incidence of CM extravasation (OR=0.394, 95% CI: 0.272-0.570). CONCLUSION: Main risk factors for CM extravasation are female, diabetes, venous thrombosis, multi-site angiography, and injection rate ≥ 3 mL/s. However, patients with malignant tumor have a low incidence of CM extravasation. CLINICAL IMPACT: Analysis of these risk factors can help reduce the incidence of CM extravasation.

Intravenous contrast medium extravasation: systematic review and updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee Guidelines.

NEED FOR A REVIEW: Guidelines for management and prevention of contrast media extravasation have not been updated recently. In view of emerging research and changing working practices, this review aims to inform update on the current guidelines. AREAS COVERED: In this paper, we review the literature pertaining to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, risk factors and treatments of contrast media extravasation. A suggested protocol and guidelines are recommended based upon the available literature. KEY POINTS: • Risk of extravasation is dependent on scanning technique and patient risk factors. • Diagnosis is mostly clinical, and outcomes are mostly favourable. • Referral to surgery should be based on clinical severity rather than extravasated volume.

Possibility of Taking an Offensive Stance in Extravasation Injury: Effects of Fat Injection in Vesicant (Doxorubicin) Induced Skin Necrosis Model in Rats.

INTRODUCTION: Extravasation injuries are one of the most feared complications of intravenous drug administration. The most common drugs associated with extravasation injury include chemotherapy agents and contrast media. Natural course of vesicant extravasation is discomfort, pain, swelling, inflammation, and ultimately skin ulceration. While diligence is the principle approach in prevention, immediate bed-side measures are as important in controlling the extent of tissue damage. Various options, either medical or interventional are next steps in treatment of the condition including antidotes, volume dilution, flushing, suction, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 12 male Wistar albino rats were divided into two groups; one group received fat injections following subdermal doxorubicin infiltration in their right thighs, while other group received saline injection following subdermal doxorubicin infiltration in their right thighs for dilution. Left thighs of both groups were left untreated following subdermal doxorubicin infiltration. Total area of necrosis, as well as resultant epidermal thicknesses were assessed. Histological analyses were conducted using modified Verhofstad scoring system for comparison. RESULTS: Mean necrotic area was significantly smaller in the fat injection group compared to other groups. Median Verhofstad score was lesser in the fat injection group as well. Median epidermal thickness, on the other hand, was greater in the fat injection group. CONCLUSION: Injection of fat grafts following vesicant extravasation might be beneficial in preventing the progression of tissue damage, if employed early.

Extravasation (paravasation) of chemotherapy drugs - updated recommendations (2020) for standard care in the Czech Republic from the cooperation of the Supportive Care Group of the Czech Society for Oncology, Czech Society for Hematology, Oncology Section of the Czech Nurses Association and the Society for Ports and Permanent Catheters.

BACKGROUNDS: Extravasation (paravasation) of chemotherapy drugs is a very significant complication. Preventive and therapeutic interventions reduce the risk of the complication or the extent of its consequences. A working group of authors from expert groups prepared recommendations for standard care. PURPOSE: A basic summary of recommended interventions for daily practice, defined on the basis of knowledge from long-term, proven, evidence-based practice or on the consensus opinions of the expert groups representatives. RESULTS: Preventive measures are essential and include early consideration of long-term venous access devices indications, choice of injection site, venous line control before each chemotherapy drug application, and patient education. The intervention in case of extravasation mainly involves the application of antidotes (DMSO, hyaluronidase, dexrazoxane) and the application of dry cold or heat according to the type of cytostatic drug. Subcutaneous corticosteroids, moist heat or cooling and compression are not recommended. CONCLUSION: The recommended procedures contribute to reducing the risk and consequences of extravasation. The range of recommended interventions can be expanded individually depending on individual clinical site policy and needs.

Study on preventing adverse events in neonates (SEPREVEN): A stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial to reduce adverse event rates in the NICU.

INTRODUCTION: Adverse events (AE) in care are recognized as a leading cause of mortality and injury in patients. Improving patients' safety is difficult to achieve. Therefore, innovative research strategies are needed to identify errors in subgroups of patients and related severity of outcomes as well as reliably measured efficiency of reproducible strategies to improve safety. This trial aims to evaluate the impact of a combined multiprofessional education program on the rate of AE in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial with 3 clusters each containing 4 units. The study time period will be 20 months. The education program will be implemented within each cluster following a random sequence with a control period, a 4-month transition period and a post-educational intervention period. Eligibility criteria: for clusters: 6 NICUs from Ile-de-France and 6 NICUs from different regions in France; for patients: in-hospital during the study period (November 23, 2015 and November 2, 2017 [inclusion start dates varying by unit]) in one of the 12 NICUs; corrected gestational age ≤42 weeks upon admission; hospitalization period >2 days; and parents informed and not opposed to the use of their newborn's data. A routine occurrence reporting of medical errors and their consequence will take place during the entire study period. The intervention will combine an education to implement a standardized root cause analysis method, creation of bundles (insertion, daily goals, maintenance bundles) to prevent catheter-associated blood-stream infection and a poster to prevent extravasation injuries. OUTCOME: We hypothesize a reduction from 60 (control) to 50 (intervention) AE/1000 patient-days. The primary outcome will be the rate of AE/1000 patient-days in the NICU. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02598609, trial registered November 6, 2015. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02598609. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Study approved by the regional ethic committee CPP Ile-de-France III (no 2014-A01751-46). The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

Preventing skin staining: an effective iron infusion protocol.

PURPOSE: To implement a safe and effective intravenous iron infusion protocol to prevent skin staining. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Mixed methods approach was utilised including education, auditing, self-reported survey, patient information leaflet and patient feedback. In total 25 healthcare professionals completed the survey and 15 patients provided feedback. FINDINGS: No skin staining or severe adverse reactions were observed over eight weeks. Audit results found 53 per cent of staff were compliant with the recommended IV iron infusion protocol and 46 per cent informed patients of skin staining risk. Self-report surveys indicated 92 per cent flushed the cannula with sodium chloride before starting the infusion, 88 per cent flushed the cannula after the infusion and 76 per cent informed patients of skin staining risk. Patient feedback was largely positive and constructive. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS: Limitations include self-reported bias, short audit time interval, missing data and discrepancy between audit and survey results. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This quality improvement project was developed following two skin staining incidences at our maternity hospital. Although rare, skin staining after intravenous iron infusion is potentially permanent and may be distressing for some patients. Intravenous iron is considered safe and effective to treat anaemia during pregnancy and is often prescribed for this patient cohort. To avoid medicolegal action and patient dissatisfaction, it is essential that patients are informed of potential skin staining and an evidence-based administration protocol is utilised.

Prevención y tratamiento de la extravasación de quimioterapia intravenosa / Prevention and Treatment of Extravasation of Intravenous Chemotherapy

RESUMEN Introducción: La extravasación endovenosa de citostáticos es una grave complicación del tratamiento en el paciente con cáncer, que puede provocar graves daños tisulares. Objetivo: Sistematizar las medidas de prevención y tratamiento a tomar por los profesionales de enfermería en la extravasación de quimioterapia intravenosa. Métodos: Revisión bibliográfica sistemática con análisis de contenido de documentos originales y de revisión publicados en español e inglés desde 2009 a 2016, con las siguientes palabras clave: "extravasación", "quimioterapia", "medidas de prevención", "tratamiento de extravasación" en SciELO. Se identificaron y revisaron artículos que fueron útiles para el desarrollo de la revisión, así como monografías de varias revistas y tesis doctorales actualizadas que permitieron el análisis histórico lógico de los criterios que sustentan medidas de prevención y tratamiento en la extravasación de quimioterapia intravenosa. Conclusiones: La prevención de esta complicación ha demostrado ser la mejor medida para evitar el daño a los tejidos, sin embrago existen tratamientos alternativos que el personal de enfermería debe conocer y aplicar con rapidez y eficiencia(AU)

ABSTRACT Introduction: Intravenous cytostatic extravasation is a serious complication of treatment in cancer patients, which can cause serious tissue damage. Objective: To systematize the prevention and treatment measures to be taken by nursing professionals in case of extravasation of intravenous chemotherapy. Methods: Systematic bibliographic review with content analysis of original and review documents published in Spanish and English in SciELO from 2009 to 2016, with the following keywords: extravasación [extravasation], quimioterapia [chemotherapy], medidas de prevención[prevention measures], tratamiento de extravasación[treatment of extravasation]. Articles that were useful for the development of the review were identified and consulted, as well as monographs of several updated journals and doctoral theses, which allowed the logical-historical analysis of the criteria that support prevention and treatment measures in the extravasation of intravenous chemotherapy. Conclusions: The prevention of this complication has proven to be the best measure to avoid tissue damage; however, there are alternative treatments that nurses should know and apply quickly and efficiently(AU)

Pharmacological management of anticancer agent extravasation: A single institutional guideline.

Although the risk of extravasation of a chemotherapy (anticancer) medication is low, the complications associated with these events can have a significant impact on morbidity and health care costs. Institutions that administer anticancer agents should ideally have a current guideline on the proper management of the inadvertent administration of these toxic medications into tissues surrounding blood vessels. It is imperative that the health care team involved in administering drugs used to treat cancer be educated on the risk factors, preventative strategies and treatment of anticancer extravasations, as well as practice safe and proper administration techniques. Anticancer agents are generally divided into classes based on their ability to cause tissue damage. The review of current published guidelines and available literature reveals a lack of consensus on how these medications should be classified. In addition, many recently approved drugs for the treatment of cancer may lack data to support their classification and management of extravasation events. The treatment of the majority of extravasations of anticancer agents involves nonpharmacological measures, potentially in the ambulatory care setting. Antidotes are available for the extravasation of a minority of vesicant agents in order to mitigate tissue damage. Due to the limited data and lack of consensus in published guidelines, a working group was established to put forth an institutional guideline on the management of anticancer extravasations.

Emergência oncológica: atuação dos enfermeiros no extravasamento de drogas quimioterápicas antineoplásicas / Oncological emergency: the work of nurses in the extravasation of antineoplastic chemotherapeutic drugs

Objetivo: Investigar a atuação dos enfermeiros no extravasamento de quimioterápicos antineoplásicos. Métodos: Estudo transversal, com abordagem quantitativa, realizado em um hospital de referência em oncologia, com uma amostra de 21 enfermeiros. Os dados foram coletados por meio da aplicação de questionário semiestruturado, nos meses de outubro e novembro de 2015, analisados por meio da frequência simples e percentual. Resultados: Os enfermeiros evidenciaram conhecimento suficiente quanto aos fatores de risco, prevenção e reconhecimento de sinais e sintomas da ocorrência de extravasamento por quimioterápicos. No entanto, o mesmo não foi verificado quanto às questões relacionadas a: classificação das drogas antineoplásicas e intervenções voltadas à ocorrência do agravo. Conclusão: Os resultados encontrados são importantes, vez que apontam para questões que devem ser refletidas por gestores hospitalares e de instituições formadoras, assim como profissionais preocupados com a melhoria da assistência à população acometida por essa patologia.

[Extravasation of Cytostatic Drugs - Prevention and Best Practices]. / Extravazace cytostatik -  prevence a doporucené postupy.

Extravasation is the leakage of a drug (intended primarily for intravenous administration) into tissues surrounding the vascular system. The damage to surrounding varies depending on the nature and volume of extravasation. Cytostatic extravasation is associated with poor outcomes for patients. This paper summarizes the types of risk associated with cytostatic extravasation, and the preventative measures that can be used when such an event occurs. We also provide information on potential treatments. However, justification for their use has only been substantiated in papers with different levels of significance and these papers are not available in all countries. We summarize current international recommendations for actions to be taken in the event of extravasation.

Prevention of cement leakage into the hip joint by a standard cement plug during PFN-A cement augmentation: a technical note.

Medial penetration of the helical blade into the hip joint after fixation of trochanteric fractures using the proximal femur nail antirotation (PFN-A) is a potential failure mode. In low demand patients a blade exchange with cement augmentation may be an option if conversion to total hip arthroplasty is unfeasible to salvage the cut-through. This article describes a technique to avoid intraarticular cement leakage using a cement plug to close the defect in the femoral head caused by the cut-through.

Extravasation injuries.

It is common for an intravascular catheter to be inserted to administer various types of therapy. Extravasation occurs frequently, and in the most severe cases plastic surgeons are often summoned to assess the extent of the injury and the possibility for reconstruction. The Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery at Oslo University Hospital assesses approximately 15 severe cases of this type each year.

Infusion-related risks associated with chemotherapy.

This article provides a comprehensive overview of the risks associated with the administration of chemotherapy, monoclonal antibodies and targeted or biological therapies in the management of solid tumours. The main physiological actions of these agents are discussed, with reference to the immediate infusion-related side effects and complications that may arise from an extravasation injury. The article focuses on the identification and early recognition of these risk factors to implement preventive measures and appropriate management strategies.

A Simple Diagnostic Test to Confirm Correct Placement of Dysfunctional Central Venous Catheters Before Chemotherapy in Children.

BACKGROUND: In children undergoing intravenous chemotherapy, partial dysfunction of the central venous catheter (CVC) is common. Fluids can be infused into the catheter; however, blood cannot be aspirated. In those situations, chemotherapy is withheld and a catheter investigation is performed. Usually, a radiographic study with contrast media or therapy with thrombolytic drugs followed by rechecking for blood return is undertaken. AIM: To evaluate if a previously described method using dilute sodium bicarbonate injection and the resultant rise in measured end-tidal carbon dioxide tracing can confirm correct intravascular placement of a dysfunctional CVC in children at the bedside. PATIENTS: Cohort group of 22 children scheduled for chemotherapy with partial dysfunction of a CVC in a tertiary hematology-oncology care facility. RESULTS: All children with a partial dysfunctional CVC that was proven to be intravascular after venogram or thrombolytic therapy had a distinct and predictable increase in end-tidal carbon dioxide response to injected bicarbonate. CONCLUSION: Injection of 1 mL/kg (maximum 20 mL) of 4.2% dilute sodium bicarbonate is a quick, simple, bedside test allowing confirmation of intravascular location of dysfunctional CVC.

Eliminating Extravasation Events: A Multidisciplinary Approach.

Administration of chemotherapy agents can give rise to many safety issues. Extravasation of a vesicant agent causes tissue blistering and necrosis. This complication of chemotherapy administration causes additional pain and suffering in patients who are already suffering with a diagnosis of cancer. Nurses hold key responsibilities for educating patients about administration issues and following practice standards to minimize the risk of extravasation. Defining a path of shared responsibilities among team members is a critical step in assuring the safe administration of drugs classified as vesicants. This article describes a clinical practice change that is used at a large midwestern academic medical cancer center. This practice and policy change has resulted in a 90% reduction in the administration of vesicant agents peripherally, with no occurrence of extravasations in the first 6 months of implementation.

Management of High Hepatopulmonary Shunting in Patients Undergoing Hepatic Radioembolization.

PURPOSE: To review the safety of hepatic radioembolization (RE) in patients with high (≥ 10%) hepatopulmonary shunt fraction (HPSF) using various prophylactic techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review was conducted of 409 patients who underwent technetium 99m-labeled macroaggregated albumin scintigraphy before planned RE. Estimated pulmonary absorbed radiation doses based on scintigraphy and hepatic administered activity were calculated. Outcomes from dose reductions and adjunctive catheter-based prophylactic techniques used to reduce lung exposure were assessed. RESULTS: There were 80 patients with HPSF ≥ 10% who received RE treatment (41 resin microspheres for metastases, 39 glass microspheres for hepatocellular carcinoma). Resin microspheres were used in 17 patients according to consensus guideline-recommended dose reduction; 38 patients received no dose reduction because the expected lung dose was < 30 Gy. Prophylactic techniques were used in 25 patients (with expected lung dose ≤ 74 Gy), including hepatic vein balloon occlusion, variceal embolization, or bland arterial embolization before, during, or after RE delivery. Repeated scintigraphy after prophylactic techniques to reduce HPSF in seven patients demonstrated a median change of -40% (range, +32 to -69%). Delayed pneumonitis developed in two patients, possibly related to radiation recall after chemoembolization. Response was lower in patients treated with resin spheres with dose reduction, with an objective response rate of 13% and disease control rate of 47% compared with 56% and 94%, respectively, without dose reduction (P = .023, P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: Dose reduction recommendations for HPSF may compromise efficacy. Excessive shunting can be reduced by prophylactic catheter-based techniques, which may improve the safety of performing RE in patients with high HPSF.

Minimizing Systemic Leakage of Cisplatin during Percutaneous Isolated Pancreas Perfusion Chemotherapy: A Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of percutaneous isolated pancreas perfusion (PIPP) by using a pig model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All experiments were approved by the institutional Animal Experiment Ethics Committee. Fifteen pigs were assigned to five groups, and PIPP was performed. Angiographic and dye injection studies were performed to confirm the patency of the PIPP system (group 1). Blood that contained cisplatin (1.5 mg per kilogram of body weight) in an extracorporeal circuit was circulated through the pancreas at three infusion rates (40, 60, and 80 mL/min) to determine the optimal infusion rate in terms of safety and pharmacologic effectiveness (groups 2, 3, and 4, respectively). Chronological laboratory data and histologic findings were assessed in group 5, which received the optimal infusion rate. Maximum platinum concentration (Cmax) and area under the platinum concentration-time curve were compared by using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: Angiography and dye injection confirmed the patency of the PIPP system. Histopathologic examinations showed no abnormalities in the pancreas or other organs at a 40 mL/min infusion rate of cisplatin. However, edematous changes in the pancreas were observed at higher infusion rates. The pharmacologic effectiveness did not differ significantly among groups; therefore, the optimal infusion rate of 40 mL/min was selected. The median pancreatic-to-systemic exposure ratios were 71.8 for Cmax and 54.8 for the area under the curve. All laboratory data remained normal or returned to pretreatment levels within 1 week. CONCLUSION: PIPP at a 40 mL/min infusion rate appears to be safe and feasible for perfusion of the pancreas.

Management of the extravasation of anti-neoplastic agents.

BACKGROUND: Extravasation is a potentially severe complication that can occur during the administration of chemotherapy. The scarcity of evidence available makes it difficult to develop an optimal management scheme. The purpose of this guideline is to review the relevant scientific literature on the prevention, management, and treatment of extravasation occurring during the administration of chemotherapy to cancer patients. METHOD: A scientific literature review was conducted using the PubMed search tool. The period covered was from database inception to April 2014, inclusively. Since the literature on extravasation treatment is often empirical, anecdotal, and controversial, the review also identified clinical practice guidelines and expert consensuses published by relevant international organizations and cancer agencies. RESULTS: Identification of potential risk factors and preventive measures can reduce the risk of extravasation. Recognition and management of symptoms are crucial in patients with this complication. Provision of adequate instruction to personnel responsible for administering chemotherapy and to patients on recognizing symptoms, preventing, and managing extravasation is essential. Extravasation can be treated with dry warm or cold compresses and various antidotes such as dimethyl sulfoxide, dexrazoxane, hyaluronidase, or sodium thiosulfate, depending on the agent that has caused extravasation. Patient monitoring to assess the progression or regression of symptoms and to thus take the appropriate measures is necessary. CONCLUSION: Several strategies must be established to ensure that extravasation is recognized and properly managed. Given the evidence available at this time, the Comité de l'évolution des pratiques en oncologie (CEPO) has made recommendations for clinical practice in Quebec.