Role of drain amylase levels assay and routinary postoperative day 3 abdominal CT scan in prevention of complications and management of surgical drains after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

To asses drains amylase (DA) cut-offs for the risk of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and define the optimal timing of drains removal based on daily DA assay and abdominal CT scan finding after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Different algorithms able to identify patients at higher risk of POPF and to assess the optimal time for drains removal after PD have been proposed. The most accurate DA cut-offs in the assessment of the risk of clinically relevant POPF were retrospectively identified. Data from a prospective trial for optimal timing of drains removal were analyzed. Then, to validate the cut-offs identified in the first phase, they were applied to the patients enrolled in the prospective trial. Patients with POD1 DA ≥ 666 U/L were at higher risk of clinically relevant POPF (p 0.0001). POD3 DA value ≥ 252 U/L predicted 88% of clinical relevant fistulas. POD3 DA level ≥ 207 U/L was able to predict 68% of biliary fistulas. Patients with abdominal collection ≥ 5 cm, showed a significantly higher rate (60% vs. 23%, p < 0.001) of biliary fistula. Timing of drains removal did not influence complications. Drains amylase levels predict clinically relevant POPF. Drains should be maintained up to POD3; in case of POD1 DA levels < 666 U/L and POD3 DA levels < 252 U/L drains could be removed. In case of POD3 DA levels, ≥ 207 the routine use of abdominal CT scan in the same day could be justified to detect collections ≥ 5 cm and maintain drains beyond the POD3.

Prevention of biliary fistula after partial hepatectomy by transcystic biliary drainage: randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Biliary fistula is one of the most common complications after hepatectomy. This study evaluated the effect of transcystic biliary drainage during hepatectomy on the occurrence of postoperative biliary fistula. METHODS: This multicentre RCT was carried out from 2009 to 2016 in nine centres. Patients were randomized to transcystic biliary drainage or no transcystic drainage (control). Patients underwent hepatectomy (more than 2 segments) of non-cirrhotic livers. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of biliary fistula after surgery. Secondary endpoints were morbidity, postoperative mortality, duration of hospital stay, reoperation, readmission to hospital, and complications caused by catheters. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 310 patients were randomized. In intention-to-treat analysis, there were 158 patients in the transcystic group and 149 in the control group. Seven patients were removed from the per-protocol analysis owing to protocol deviations. The biliary fistula rate was 5·9 per cent in intention-to-treat and 6·0 per cent in per-protocol analyses. The rate was similar in the transcystic and control groups (5·7 versus 6·0 per cent; P = 1·000). There were no differences in terms of morbidity (49·4 versus 46·3 per cent; P = 0·731), mortality (2·5 versus 4·7 per cent; P = 0·367) and reoperations (4·4 versus 10·1 per cent; P = 1·000). Median duration of hospital stay was longer in the transcystic group (11 versus 10 days; P = 0·042). The biliary fistula risk was associated with the width and length of the hepatic cut surface. CONCLUSION: This randomized trial did not demonstrate superiority of transcystic drainage during hepatectomy in preventing biliary fistula. The use of transcystic drainage during hepatectomy to prevent postoperative biliary fistula is not recommended. Registration number: NCT01469442 ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

ANTECEDENTES: La fístula biliar es una de las complicaciones más comunes después de la hepatectomía. Este estudio evalúa el efecto del drenaje biliar transcístico durante la hepatectomía en la aparición de una fístula biliar postoperatoria. MÉTODOS: Este ensayo prospectivo aleatorizado y multicéntrico (Clinical Trial NCT01469442) con dos grupos de estudio (grupo transcístico versus grupo control) se llevó a cabo de 2009 a 2016 en 9 centros. Los pacientes fueron sometidos a una hepatectomía (≥ 2 segmentos) en hígados no cirróticos. El resultado principal fue la aparición de una fístula biliar después de la cirugía. Los resultados secundarios fueron la morbilidad, la mortalidad postoperatoria, la duración de la estancia hospitalaria, la reintervención, la necesidad de reingreso y las complicaciones causadas por los catéteres. Se realizaron análisis por intención de tratamiento y por protocolo. RESULTADOS: Un total de 310 pacientes fueron randomizados. Por intención de tratamiento, 158 pacientes fueron aleatorizados al grupo transcístico y 149 al grupo control. Siete pacientes fueron excluidos del análisis por protocolo por desviaciones del protocolo. La tasa de fístula biliar fue del 5,9% en el análisis por intención de tratamiento y del 6,0% en el análisis por protocolo. Esta tasa fue similar para el grupo transcístico y para el grupo control: 5,7% versus 6,0% (P = 1). No hubo diferencias en términos de morbilidad (49,4% versus 46,9%, P = 0,731), mortalidad (2,5% versus 4,7%, P = 0,367) y reintervenciones (4,4% versus 10,1%, P = 1). La mediana de la duración de la estancia hospitalaria fue mayor para el grupo transcístico (11 versus 10 días, P = 0,042). El riesgo de fístula biliar se correlacionó con el grosor y la longitud de la transección hepática. CONCLUSIÓN: Este ensayo aleatorizado no demuestra la superioridad del drenaje transcístico durante la hepatectomía para prevenir la fístula biliar. No se recomienda el uso de drenaje transcístico durante la hepatectomía para prevenir la fístula biliar postoperatoria.

The Role of Prophylactic Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Prevention of Postoperative Bile Leak in Hydatid Liver Disease: A Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Bile leak is the main cause of morbidity and mortality after surgery for hydatid liver cysts. Aim was to assess the role of prophylactic endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) in reducing postoperative bile leak in patients undergoing partial cystectomy. METHODS: Fifty-four patients with hepatic hydatid cyst met inclusion criteria, 27 were excluded or declined to participate. Twenty-six women and 28 men (mean age 44.6 ± 10.1, range: 22-61 years) were randomly assigned to either group I with ES (n = 27) or group II without ES (n = 27). RESULTS: Demographics and clinical, laboratory, and radiological characteristics of cysts were not statistically different between two groups. Group I had a significant decrease in bile leak rate compared with group II (11.1% versus 40.7%, P = .013), with significantly shorter duration of hospital stay (P < .0001). Biliary fistula in group I had significantly lower daily output (100 mL/day versus 350 mL/day) with gradual reduction till stoppage of leak in 3-4 days without intervention. Biliary fistula in group II had a significantly higher need for biliary intervention through postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with ES compared with biliary fistula in group I (FEP = .002), with significantly longer mean time of fistula closure (P = .011) and longer time to drain removal (P < .0001). Nonbiliary complications were comparable between two groups. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic ES provides significant reduction in postoperative bile leak rate with shorter hospital stay after partial cystectomy of hydatid cyst. Biliary fistula in patients with ES has significantly lower daily output with shorter time of drain removal and shorter time to closure than patients without ES.

Biliary fistula after liver resection: central role of intraoperative perihepatic drain.

BACKGROUNDː Despite notable advances in surgical skills and technology, incidence of biliary fistula after hepatic resection remains an issue. Aim of this study was to assess the role of intraoperative perihepatic drain in diagnosis and treatment of this complication. METHODSː The study included 641 patients who underwent hepatic resection without hepaticojejunostomy between Jan-2003 and Jan-2016. Data were obtained from our single-institution perspective database. RESULTSː Biliary fistula occurred in 3.4% (22/641). Major hepatic resection (P<0.001), S4-involving resection (P=0.006), cholangiocarcinoma (P<0.001) and intraoperative blood losses >375 mL (P<0.001) were associated with biliary fistula. At multivariate analysis, among patients with effective intraoperative perihepatic drain ("D" group) (16/22) onset of biliary fistula (mean, 5.1 vs. 31.5 days, P=0.12) and healing time (mean, 26.5 vs. 82.3 days, P=0.033) were more favorable compared with biloma group (B). Moreover, conservative treatment was more effective in D group (75% of cases). B group developed increased morbidity in terms of jaundice (83.3% vs. 18.7%, P=0.005), abscess (66.7% vs. 6.2%, P=0.003) and a trend of prolonged hospital stay (mean, 25.7 vs. 19.2 days, P=0.51) and mortality (16.7% vs. 6.2%, P=0.449). Difference in biliary fistula severity rate according to ISGLS classification between the two groups was statistically significant (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONSː This study confirms that the wider is the resection the higher the risk for biliary fistula. A correct drainage of bile leakage is the crucial requisite for early healing, providing a milder postoperative course. In our experience, intraoperative perihepatic drain positioning plays a key-role, as well as postoperative patency monitoring.

[Hemihepatectomy]. / Hemihepatektomie.

Hemihepatectomy continues to be a standard procedure for the resection of primary or secondary liver tumours in hepatobiliary surgery. In this tutorial, a case study illustrates the indication for liver resection as well as surgical steps and different techniques. Indications for right or left hemihepatectomy include liver tumours that cause a diffuse or extended infiltration of one half of the liver or tumours extending to the central confluence of liver veins or the liver hilum. Usually, a resection limit is only required in the case of extended hemihepatectomies, where a two-stage resection is needed. In addition to exploration and intraoperative ultrasound, this tutorial presents different entry sites, liver mobilisation, hilum preparation and common techniques of parenchymal dissection. Finally, a number of haemostasis, closure and biliary monitoring techniques are shown. The video tutorial demonstrates all fundamental steps of hemihepatectomy from indication to closure, with a special focus on different approaches.

[Biliary leaks after liver resection. Prevention and treatment]. / Gallenleckage nach Leberresektion. Vermeidung und Behandlung.

The surgical treatment of primary and secondary liver pathologies is nowadays standard practice. Since the first major resections performed by Langenbruch in 1888 there have been significant developments in the surgical technique. In addition to the surgical technique, the diagnostics and patient selection, perioperative care and anesthetic management as well as knowledge of liver anatomy and physiology have also shown significant developments. The proportion of complex operations, even within the framework of multimodal concepts has also increased. Despite this increasing complexity, the morbidity (< 45 %) and mortality (< 5 %) of liver surgery could be clearly reduced; however, the incidence of postoperative biliary leaks in large published series currently lies between 0 % and 30 % and has only shown a minimal reduction in recent years. The management of bile leakage requires an interdisciplinary management involving endoscopic and radiological, interventional or operative therapy. Most leakages (69-94 %) persist under conservative treatment (drainage and if necessary antibiotic therapy). For high volume fistulas and persistent biliary leakage endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) with stent placement represents the therapy of choice. Infections with biliary peritonitis and failure of interventional strategies often require revision surgery, possibly consisting of suturing if a leakage is identifiable, replacement of drainages or application of a bile duct drainage (e.g. T-drain or transhepatic external biliary drainage).

[Liver transection: modern procedure: Technique, results and costs]. / Lebertranssektion: moderne Verfahren : Technik, Ergebnisse und Kosten.

Liver resection has developed into the current standard procedure due to modern resection techniques, profound knowledge of the liver anatomy and optimized surgical and anesthesiological strategies to allow extended resections with both low morbidity and mortality. Initially major blood loss was the biggest concern with liver resection and a Pringle's manoeuvre was necessary. Nowadays, biliary leakage is the major problem after liver surgery. Besides the classical conventional clamp crushing technique for parenchymal transection, various devices including ultrasound, microwaves and staplers have been introduced. Minimally invasive techniques have become increasingly important for liver resection but are still applied in selected patients only. The selection of the resection technique and device mainly depends on the extent of the resection and also on the liver parenchyma, the liver disease, costs, personal experiences and preferences. This article presents a selection of techniques used in modern parenchymal transection during liver resection with special focus on transection time, blood loss, bile leakage and costs.

Pancreaticogastrostomy is superior to pancreaticojejunostomy for prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To review prospective randomized controlled trials to determine whether pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) or pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) is associated with lower risks of mortality and pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). BACKGROUND: Previous studies comparing reconstruction by PG and PJ reported conflicting results regarding the relative risks of mortality and pancreatic fistula after these procedures. METHODS: MEDLINE, the Cochrane Trials Register, and EMBASE were searched for prospective randomized controlled trials comparing PG and PJ after PD, published up to November 2013. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.0. RESULTS: Seven trials were selected, including 562 patients who underwent PG and 559 who underwent PJ. The pancreatic fistula rate was significantly lower in the PG group than in the PJ group (63/562, 11.2% vs 84/559, 18.7%; odds ratio = 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.75; P = 0.0003). The overall mortality rate was 3.7% (18/489) in the PG group and 3.9% (19/487) in the PJ group (P = 0.68). The biliary fistula rate was significantly lower in the PG group than in the PJ group (8/400, 2.0% vs 19/392, 4.8%; odds ratio = 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.93; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In PD, reconstruction by PG is associated with lower postoperative pancreatic and biliary fistula rates.

Rubber transcystic drainage reduces the post-removal biliary complications in liver transplantation: a matched case-control study.

PURPOSE: Bile duct (BD) complications continue to be the "Achilles' heel" of liver transplantation, and the utilization of bile duct drainage is still on debate. We describe the results of a less invasive rubber trancystic biliary drainage (TBD) compared to a standard silicone T-tube (TT). METHODS: The transplanted patients (n = 248), over a period of 5 years with a TBD (n = 20), were matched 1:2 with control patients with a TT (n = 40). Primary end points were the overall incidence of BD complications and graft and patient survival. Secondary end points included the complications after the drainage removal. RESULTS: Although the bile duct leakage rates were not significantly different between both groups, the TT group had a significantly higher rate of overall 1-year BD stenosis (40 versus 10 %) (p = 0.036). Three-year patient/graft survival rates were 83.2/80.1 and 84.4/84.4 % for the TT and TBD groups, respectively. The postoperative BD complications, after drainage removal (peritonitis and stenosis), were significantly reduced (p = 0.011) with the use of a TBD. CONCLUSION: The use of rubber TBD in liver transplant recipients does not increase the number of BD complications compared to the T-tube. Furthermore, less BD anastomotic stenosis and post-removal complications were observed in the TBD group compared to the TT group.

[Hepaticojejunostomy after pancreatic head resection - technical aspects for reconstruction of small and fragile bile ducts with T-tube drainage]. / Die Technik der Hepatikojejunostomie mit T-Drainage bei der Rekonstruktion schmalkalibriger Gallengänge nach Pankreaskopfresektion.

BACKGROUND: After pancreatic head resection the reconstruction of small and fragile bile ducts is technically demanding, resulting in more postoperative bile leaks. One option for the reconstruction is the placement of a T-tube drainage at the site of the anastomosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Standard reconstruction after pancreatic head resection was an end-to-side hepaticojejunostomy with PDS 5.0, 15-25 cm distally from the pancreaticojejunostomy. For patients with a small bile duct diameter (≤ 5 mm) or a fragile bile duct wall the reconstruction was performed with PDS 6.0 and a T-tube drainage at the side of the anastomosis. RESULTS: The reconstruction with a T-tube drainage at the site of the anastomosis is technically easy to perform and offers the opportunity for immediate visualisation of the anastomosis in the postoperative period by application of water soluble contrast medium. If a bile leak occurs, biliary deviation through the T-tube drainage can enable a conservative management without revisional laparotomy in selected patients. Whether or not a conservative management of postoperative bile leaks will lead to more bile duct strictures is a subject for further investigations. CONCLUSION: A T-tube drainage at the site of the anastomosis can probably not prevent postoperative bile leaks from a difficult hepaticojejunostomy, but in selected patients it offers the opportunity for a conservative management resulting in less re-operations. Therefore we recommend the augmentation of a difficult hepaticojejunostomy with a T-tube drainage.

Leakage tests reduce the frequency of biliary fistulas following hydatid liver cyst surgery.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Biliary fistulas are the most common morbidity (8.2-26%) following hydatid liver surgery. The aim of our study was to reduce the incidence of postoperative biliary fistulas after the suturing of cystobiliary communications by applying a bile leakage test. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 133 hydatid liver cysts from 93 patients were divided into two groups, according to whether the test was performed. Tests were performed on 56 cysts from 34 patients, and the remaining 77 cysts from 59 patients were treated without the test. In both groups, all visible biliary orifices in the cysts were suture ligated, and drains were placed in all cysts. The visibility of the biliary orifices and postoperative biliary drainage through the drains were recorded. Patients in both groups were also compared with respect to the number of days living with the drains, the length of the hospital stay, and secondary interventions related to biliary complications. RESULTS: Biliary orifices were more visible in the tested cysts (13% vs. 48%; P <0.001). Fewer biliary complications occurred in the tested patients (8.8% vs. 27.7%, P = 0.033). The mean drain removal time (4.1 ± 3.3 days vs. 6.8 ± 8.9 days, P < 0.05) and the length of the hospital stay (6.7 ± 2.7 days vs. 9.7 ± 6.3 days, P,0.01) were shorter for the tested patients. None of the patients in the test group required postoperative Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) or nasobiliary drainage (0.0% vs. 8.4%, P = 0.09). There were no long-term biliary complications for either group after three years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of biliary orifices with a bile leakage test and the suturing of cystobiliary communications significantly reduced postoperative biliary complications following hydatid liver surgery.