Intestinal-type mucinous adenocarcinoma of the Bartholin gland in a perimenopausal woman. A case report and review of the literature.

We report the case of a 46-year-old woman who presented with a tumor on the left labium majus in the region of the Bartholin gland. Surgical excision revealed a mucinous adenocarcinoma of intestinal-type (CK20+, CDX-2+). Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography of the chest and abdomen and colonoscopy ruled out the presence of other tumors. A second immunohistochemical study showed negative results for GATA-3, mammaglobin and GCDFP-15. Molecular analysis revealed a mutation in exon 2 of the KRAS gene. We discuss its differential diagnosis and the importance of being aware of this unusual variant of a mucinous adenocarcinoma the Bartholin gland.

Prognostic implications of the coexisting precursor lesion types in invasive gallbladder cancer.

Invasive gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is preceded by two main types of precursor lesions: intracholecystic papillary-tubular neoplasms (ICPNs) and biliary intraepithelial neoplasias (BilINs). Invasive GBCs with an ICPN component have more favorable prognoses than those without an ICPN component. Some BilINs show a relatively exophytic papillary pattern but do not meet the ICPN criteria; at our institution, we call these papillary neoplasias. To clarify the clinical significance of papillary neoplasia, we herein examined 80 invasive GBCs and classified them into three groups based on the type of preinvasive lesions: those with ICPN (ICPN group, n = 35), those with papillary neoplasia (pap-neoplasia group, n = 13), and those without ICPN/papillary neoplasia (group without ICPN/pap-neoplasia, n = 32). We then compared the prognostic differences and characterized the tumors of each group by determining the immunohistochemical expressions of various biomarkers. The overall survival periods of the ICPN and pap-neoplasia groups were significantly longer than that of the group without ICPN/pap-neoplasia (P < 0.0001, P = 0.0036, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that lacking ICPN/papillary neoplasia was independently associated with poor prognosis (P = 0.0007), as were poor differentiation (P = 0.0395), presence of preoperative symptoms (P = 0.0488), and advanced stage (P = 0.0234). Invasive components of the ICPN and pap-neoplasia groups were characterized by higher expressions of p16 and p53 compared with those of the group without ICPN/pap-neoplasia. The prognoses of the invasive GBCs with either papillary neoplasia or ICPN were thus more favorable than those of the invasive GBCs without ICPN/pap-neoplasia. Invasive GBCs with exophytic papillary preinvasive lesions (ICPN and papillary neoplasia) may be biologically different from those without such lesions.

An algorithmic approach utilizing CK7, TTF1, beta-catenin, CDX2, and SSTR2A can help differentiate between gastrointestinal and pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas.

Primary gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (GI-NEC) cannot be distinguished morphologically from pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (P-NEC). This can present a significant diagnostic challenge in cases where site of origin cannot be readily determined. To identify immunohistochemical (IHC) markers that can be used to reliably distinguish between GI-NECs and P-NECs, we constructed 3-mm tissue microarrays, one containing 13 GI-NECs and one containing 20 P-NECs. IHC was performed on both microarrays using 21 stains: AE1/AE3, CK7, CK20, synaptophysin, chromogranin, CD56, INSM1, SSTR2A, CDX2, SATB2, TTF1, Napsin A, PR, GATA3, PAX8, ISL1, beta-catenin, AFP, SMAD4, Rb, and p53. For GI-NEC, the most strongly expressed marker was synaptophysin (mean H-score 248), while AE1/AE3 was the most strongly expressed in P-NEC (mean H-score 230), which was stronger than in GI-NEC (p = 0.011). Other markers that were stronger overall in P-NEC than in GI-NEC included CK7 (p < 0.0001) and TTF1 (p < 0.0001). Markers that were stronger overall in GI-NEC than in P-NEC included SSTR2A (p = 0.0021), SATB2 (p = 0.018), CDX2 (p = 0.019), and beta-catenin (nuclear; p = 0.029). SMAD4, Rb, and p53 showed similar rates of abnormal protein expression. Based on these results, a stepwise algorithmic approach utilizing CK7, TTF1, beta-catenin, CDX2, and SSTR2A had a 91% overall accuracy in distinguishing these GI-NEC from P-NEC. This was tested on a second cohort of 10 metastatic GI-NEC and 10 metastatic P-NEC, with an accuracy in this cohort of 85% and an overall accuracy of 89% for the 53 cases tested. Our algorithm reasonably discriminates GI-NEC from P-NEC using currently available IHC stains.

A modified protein marker panel to identify four consensus molecular subtypes in colorectal cancer using immunohistochemistry.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous disease with different genetic and molecular backgrounds, leading to a diverse patient prognosis and treatment response. Four consensus molecular subtypes (CMS 1-4) have recently been proposed based on transcriptome profiling. A clinically practical immunohistochemistry (IHC) based CMS classifier consisting of the four markers FRMD6, ZEB1, HTR2B, and CDX2 was then demonstrated. However, the IHC-CMS classifier did not distinguish between CMS2 and CMS3 tumours. In this study, we have applied the proposed transcriptome based and IHC-based CMS classifiers in a CRC cohort of 65 patients and found a concordance of 77.5 %. Further, we modified the IHC-CMS classifier by analysing the differentially expressed genes between CMS2 and CMS3 tumours using RNA-sequencing data from the TCGA dataset. The result showed that WNT signalling was among the most upregulated pathways in CMS2 tumours, and the expression level of CTNNB1 (encoding ß-catenin), a WNT pathway hallmark, was significantly upregulated (P = 1.15 × 10-6). We therefore introduced nuclear ß-catenin staining to the IHC-CMS classifier. Using the modified classifier in our cohort, we found a 71.4 % concordance between the IHC and RNA-sequencing based CMS classifiers. Moreover, ß-catenin staining could classify 16 out of the 19 CMS2/3 tumours into CMS2 or CMS3, thereby showing an 84.2 % concordance with the RNA-sequencing-based classifier. In conclusion, we evaluated CMS classifiers based on transcriptome and IHC analysis. We present a modified IHC panel that categorizes CRC tumours into the four CMS groups. To our knowledge, this is the first study using IHC to identify all four CMS groups.

CDX2-positive breast cancer presented with axillary lymph node metastases: A case report.

BACKGROUND: The caudal type homeobox 2 transcription factor (CDX2) is a specific and sensitive marker for intestinal carcinoma, but usually not expressed in breast cancer. In CDX2-positive metastatic cancer of occult primary, the origin is highly suspicious of an enteric carcinoma. CASE PRESENTATION: A 50-year-old woman complained of enlarged lymph nodes (LNs) in the right axilla. Mammography and ultrasonography scans showed no abnormal findings in her breasts. Core needle biopsy (CNB) revealed metastatic adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemical staining was positive for CDX2 intensely. The primary tumor was suspicious of intestinal adenocarcinoma. A dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging scan revealed an accentuated lesion which was detected using a second-look ultrasound, and diagnosed invasive ductal carcinoma by CNB. A partial mastectomy of the right breast with level I and II axillary LN dissection was performed. A few cells of primary cancer were expressed CDX2 and estrogen receptor. The final pathological diagnosis was T1bN3aM0 stage IIIC. The fluorescent double staining showed that CDX2 simultaneously expressed on the Ki67 positive cells of metastatic tumors. The adjuvant treatment included chemotherapy and radiation, followed by tamoxifen administration. The patient survived without any recurrences over the following 36 months. CONCLUSIONS: We report a rare case of CDX2-positive metastatic breast cancer in the axillary LNs. As some literatures reported vitamin D pathways induced cancer cell apoptosis and inhibition, these metastatic cells of our case might play the effort of autoregulation of inhibiting progression.

Mismatch repair phenotype determines the implications of tumor grade and CDX2 expression in stage II-III colon cancer.

Mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency is an indicator of good prognosis in localized colon cancer but also associated with lack of expression of caudal-type homeobox transcription factor 2 (CDX2) and high tumor grade; markers that in isolation indicate a poor prognosis. Our study aims to identify clinically relevant prognostic subgroups by combining information about tumor grade, MMR phenotype, and CDX2 expression. Immunohistochemistry for MMR proteins and CDX2 was performed in 544 patients with colon cancer stage II-III, including a cohort from a randomized trial. In patients with proficient MMR (pMMR) and CDX2 negativity, hazard ratio (HR) for cancer death was 2.93 (95% CI 1.23-6.99, p = 0.015). Cancer-specific survival for pMMR/CDX2-negative cases was 35.8 months (95% CI 23.4-48.3) versus 52.1-53.5 months (95% CI 45.6-58.6, p = 0.001) for the remaining cases (CDX2-positive tumors or deficient MMR (dMMR)/CDX2-negative tumors). In our randomized cohort, high tumor grade was predictive of response to adjuvant fluorouracil-levamisole in pMMR patients, with a significant interaction between tumor grade and treatment (p = 0.036). For pMMR patients, high tumor grade was a significant marker of poor prognosis in the surgery-only group (HR 4.60 (95% CI 1.68-12.61), p = 0.003) but not in the group receiving chemotherapy (HR 0.66 (95% CI 0.15-3.00), p = 0.587). To conclude, patients with pMMR and CDX2 negativity have a very poor prognosis. Patients with pMMR and high-graded tumors have a poor prognosis but respond well to adjuvant chemotherapy. CDX2 expression and tumor grade did not impact prognosis in patients with dMMR.

The transcriptional factors CDX2 and FOXA1 in chordomas.

Chordomas are rare osseous tumors believed to originate from notochordal remnants through brachyury activation. CDX2 and FOXA1 are both induced by brachyury, but their expression has not been studied in chordomas. We retrospectively studied the immunohistochemical expression of these two factors in 57 chordomas, finding that CDX2 is not expressed in these tumors. FOXA1 expression was found in 7 (12.3%) tumors. No association of FOXA1 expression with clinical factors was found. Thus, CDX2 expression is not a feature of chordomas, while a limited expression of FOXA1 is seen.

Cutaneous Adenosquamous Carcinoma of the Scalp With Intestinal Phenotype.

Cutaneous adenosquamous carcinoma is a mixed, squamous and glandular, rare malignant tumor of the skin characterized by a mixed, squamous, and glandular differentiation. Few cases of this tumor have been so far reported, and even fewer have been thoroughly studied by immunohistochemistry. We report here an exceptional case of cutaneous adenosquamous carcinoma which showed immunohistochemically features of intestinal differentiation, namely because of the expression of keratin 20 and CDX2, a marker of gastrointestinal tumors.

CDX2, SATB2, GATA3, TTF1, and PAX8 Immunohistochemistry in Krukenberg Tumors.

Twenty-six Krukenberg tumors (16 lower gastrointestinal, 4 upper gastrointestinal, and 6 of unknown origin) and their primaries when known were stained with CDX2, SATB2, GATA3, TTF1, and PAX8 using a tissue microarray containing predominantly or exclusively signet ring cells. The most common primary was appendiceal mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma. CDX2 and SATB2 were positive in all known lower gastrointestinal primary tumors and negative in nearly all known upper gastrointestinal primary tumors. Primaries showed identical immunophenotypes to their metastases. Among cases of unknown primary origin, 3 were positive and 3 were negative for CDX2 and SATB2. Chest images, upper endoscopies, colonoscopies, appendectomies, and mammogram were performed with negative results in all, 4, 2, 2, and 1 cases, respectively. No cystoscopies were attempted. PAX8, GATA3, and TTF1 were negative in all cases. The literature was reviewed with emphasis on immunohistochemistry of signet ring cell-containing carcinomas from the appendix, colon, stomach, breast, lung, and bladder. Three quarters of gastric primaries stain for CDX2 and only rare examples stain for SATB2. Colorectal primaries (most of them) and appendiceal primaries (all of them) are positive for CDX2 and SATB2. GATA3 stains almost all breast primaries and approximately half of bladder primaries. All pulmonary primaries are positive for TTF1. PAX8 is negative in the gastric, colorectal, and appendiceal primaries reported. This study shows that the panel of immunostains is useful in confirming the site of origin of a metastatic Krukenberg tumor when one is known and has limited diagnostic value for diagnosing metastases of unknown origin.

SATB2 and CDX2 are prognostic biomarkers in DNA mismatch repair protein deficient colon cancer.

DNA mismatch repair protein deficient colon cancer frequently displays reduced CDX2 expression, and recent literature has suggested that negative CDX2 expression is a poor prognostic biomarker in colon cancer. We have recently demonstrated that SATB2 is an immunohistochemical marker that is complementary to CDX2. Using a tissue microarray approach, we evaluated SATB2 and CDX2 immunohistochemical expression in 514 patients with colonic adenocarcinoma including 146 with mismatch repair protein deficient tumors and correlated expression with histopathologic variables, molecular alterations, and survival. Overall, SATB2-negative and/or CDX2-negative expression was identified in 33% of mismatch repair protein deficient tumors compared with only 15% of mismatch repair protein proficient tumors (p < 0.001) and in 36% of BRAF V600E mutated compared with only 13% of BRAF wild-type tumors (p < 0.001). Both SATB2-negative and CDX2-negative colonic adenocarcinomas more often displayed lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, and perineural invasion (all with p < 0.05). SATB2-negative expression was also more frequently identified in tumors with mucinous or signet ring cell differentiation (p < 0.01 for both). In a multivariable analysis of survival in patients with mismatch repair protein deficient tumors (n = 131), only tumor stage (p = 0.01) and SATB2-negative and/or CDX2-negative expression (p = 0.009) independently predicted disease-specific survival. Of the 99 patients with stage II or III mismatch repair protein deficient tumors, death from disease only occurred in patients with either SATB2-negative or CDX2-negative tumors, and no patients with SATB2-positive/CDX2-positive tumors developed recurrence or died of disease. SATB2 and CDX2 expression had no effect on patient survival in mismatch repair protein proficient, BRAF-mutated, or KRAS-mutated tumors. In summary, our results suggest that SATB2 and CDX2 are prognostic biomarkers in patients with mismatch repair protein deficient colon cancer and that inclusion of SATB2 and CDX2 immunohistochemistry may be helpful as part of a comprehensive pathologic risk assessment in mismatch repair protein deficient colon cancer.

SATB2 Versus CDX2: A Battle Royale for Diagnostic Supremacy in Mucinous Tumors.

CONTEXT.­: Metastatic mucinous tumors present a diagnostic challenge for pathologists as tumor histomorphology is often nonspecific and optimal immunoprofiles are still under investigation. OBJECTIVE.­: To present a head-to-head comparison of special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 (SATB2) and caudal type homeobox 2 (CDX2) expression in a diverse array of primary mucinous tumors. DESIGN.­: SATB2 and CDX2 immunohistochemical stains were performed on whole sections from 44 mucinous colorectal carcinomas and 175 noncolorectal mucinous tumors. A nuclear scoring system measuring intensity (0-3+) and percentage staining (0 = <5%, 1 = 5%-49%, 2 = ≥50%) was implemented, producing an additive histologic score (H-score). RESULTS.­: SATB2 demonstrated acceptable accuracy at low to moderate expression levels (H-scores of 1-4). With these H-score cutoffs, overall accuracy was greater than 90%. In contrast, CDX2's accuracy rivaled that of SATB2 only at an H-score of 5 (89.0%), as its specificity suffered at lower expression levels (<70.0% at H-scores of 1-4). Using a moderate H-score cutoff of 3 or higher, significant differences for both sensitivity and specificity were identified between SATB2 and CDX2 (P = .01 for sensitivity and P < .001 for specificity), though these stains were near equivalent when each was interpreted as positive at its respective optimal H-score (SATB2 ≥ 3 and CDX2 = 5). CONCLUSIONS.­: SATB2 is a more accurate marker of colorectal origin across a variety of expression levels compared with CDX2 when applied to mucinous tumors from a host of primary sites. However, these stains are near equivalent when each is interpreted at its optimal expression level.

[Combined application of immunohistochemical markers to identify pathologic subtypes of ampullary carcinoma and its clinical significance].

Objective: To investigate the expression of immunomarkers CK7, CK20, CK17, CDX2, MUC1 and MUC2 in primary adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater, to explore the role of these markers in the histopathologic subclassification of ampullary carcinoma; and to provide biologic basis for precision treatment of patients with different types of ampullary carcinoma. Methods: Forty-two cases of primary ampullary carcinoma were collected at Peking University People's Hospital, from 2012 to 2018 year. There were 22 males and 20 females. Aged range 42 to 88 years old, with mean aged (62±11) years. Among the patients, 6 was high differentiation, 19 median differentiation, and 17 low differentiation. Immunohistochemical studies on the expression of CK7, CK20, CK17, CDX2, MUC1 and MUC2 were performed in 42 cases of primary ampullary carcinoma. The relationship between different ampullary carcinoma subtypes and clinicopathologic survival data was analyzed using SPSS 16.0 statistical software. Results: Three histopathologic subtypes were observed. Among 42 cases, 8(19.0%)were classified as intestinal subtype, which showed a positive expression rate of 8/8 for both CK20 and CDX2, and 5/8 for MUC2. Both CK7 and CK17 were weakly expressed in one case (1/8). No expression was observed for MUC1 in this subtype. Twenty-two (52.4%,22/42) cases were classified as pancreaticobiliary subtype, which showed a positive expression rate of 100.0%(22/22) for both CK7 and MUC1, and 90.9% (20/22) for CK17. No expression was observed for CK20, CDX2 and MUC2.The remaining 12 (28.6%) cases were classified as mixed subtype, which showed variable expression patterns. The expression frequencies of these 6 immunomarkers in different subtypes of ampullary carcinoma did not correlate with various clinicopathologic factors such as patient gender and age, tumor size, histologic differentiation, pancreatic and bile duct invasion, or the depth of duodenal invasion. However, stage Ⅲ+Ⅳ diseases were more commonly seen in pancreaticobiliary type (63.6%,14/22) than intestinal type (2/8) and mixed type (3/9; χ(2)=6.508, P=0.039). Follow-up data showed a trend of better survival rate for patients with intestinal subtype than those with mixed and pancreaticobiliary subtypes. Conclusions: Ampullary carcinoma can be subclassified into three different subtypes using a panel of six immunomarkers, especially for the identification of subtypes of poorly differentiated carcinoma. CK7, CK17 and MUC1 are major markers of pancreaticobiliary subtype, whereas CK20, CDX2 and MUC2 are useful markers for intestinal subtype. The mixed subtype variably expresses these markers. The prognosis of patients with intestinal subtype appears better than that of pancreaticobiliary and mixed subtypes. Accurate subtyping of ampullary carcinoma is clinically important to patient management and prognosis assessment.

SATB2 Is Superior to CDX2 in Distinguishing Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract and Lower Gastrointestinal Tract.

Signet ring cell carcinomas of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract are clinically aggressive neoplasms with frequent intra-abdominal metastases at initial presentation. Currently available immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers cannot distinguish signet ring cell carcinomas of the lower GI tract and upper GI tract, suggesting the need for more specific diagnostic markers. SATB2 is a novel, sensitive marker for colorectal carcinoma. We hypothesized that SATB2 IHC can reliably identify primary and metastatic signet ring cell carcinomas of lower GI tract origin. SATB2 and CDX2 IHC was performed on 159 primary (n=93) and metastatic (n=66) signet ring cell carcinomas of GI tract origin and 13 metastatic breast carcinomas with signet ring cell features. Positive SATB2 expression (SATB2) was identified in 82% (27/33) of appendiceal, 88% (43/49) of colorectal, 13% (7/54) of gastric, and 35% (8/23) of esophageal/esophagogastric junction signet ring cell carcinomas. Primary and metastatic signet ring cell carcinomas of lower GI tract origin were more frequently SATB2 than those from upper GI tract (70/82, 85% vs. 15/77, 19%, P<0.01). Compared with CDX2, SATB2 and dual-positive staining for SATB2 and CDX2 both had higher specificities for signet ring cell carcinomas from the lower GI tract (81% vs. 49% and 86% vs. 49%, respectively, P<0.01 for both). Two (15%) metastatic breast carcinoma were SATB2, but all 13 demonstrated negative CDX2 staining. In summary, our results show SATB2 is a relatively specific immunohistochemistry marker for both metastatic and primary signet ring cell carcinomas of lower GI tract origin.

The prognostic impact of CDX2 correlates with the underlying mismatch repair status and BRAF mutational status but not with distant metastasis in colorectal cancer.

Loss of CDX2 expression has been proposed to be a prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer (CRC) correlating with shorter overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Since metastatic disease, mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency, and the mutational status of BRAF are considered to be important prognostic determinants in CRC, the present study aimed to analyze CDX2 expression in correlation with these parameters. Immunohistochemistry for CDX2, hMLH1, and hMSH2 was applied to a study cohort of 503 CRC specimens (FIRE-3) and a matched case-control collection of 50 right-sided CRC specimens with synchronous distant metastases and 50 right-sided CRCs without distant metastases. Furthermore, the mutational status of BRAF gene was analyzed utilizing pyrosequencing. CDX2 expression significantly correlates with reduced OS (p = 0.008) within the study population. In both cohorts, a significant correlation of CDX2 expression and MMR deficiency as well as the presence of a BRAF mutation (each p > 0.001) was observed, whereas no correlation of CDX2 expression and synchronous metastasis could be obtained. In the case-control study, only patients with proficient MMR status showed a correlation of CDX2 loss and synchronous metastasis, whereas in patients with deficient MMR status and CDX2 loss, no distant metastases at the time of diagnosis were found (p = 0.003). We could demonstrate that the reduced OS of CDX2-negative CRC patients is not caused by higher rates of distant metastases. Furthermore, our data indicate that the prognostic impact of CDX2 depends on the MMR status and the BRAF mutational status of the tumors. Thus, it could be concluded that CDX2 is not an independent prognostic biomarker in CRC.

[Value of immunocytochemistry in differential diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma, reactive mesothelial cells and malignant epithelial mesothelioma in metastatic effusion fluid].

Objective: To investigate the diagnostic value of some antibodies in peritoneal fluid of patients with gastric cancer and malignant epithelioid mesothelioma in serous effusion. Methods: One hundred and eighty-two cases of serous effusion were collected at Jilin Cancer Hospital, from July 2012 to July 2016. The expression of GLUT1, CDX2, Villin, calretinin and WT1 was evaluated using SP immunocytochemical technique in peritoneal fluid samples collected from 98 patients with gastric cancer and 74 patients with reactive mesothelial cells. The expression of GLUT1, calretinin and WT1 was also evaluated in serous effusion from 10 patients with mesothelioma. Results: The sensitivity of GLUT1, CDX2 and Villin in adenocarcinoma cells was 91.8%(90/98), 68.4% (67/98) and 88.8%(87/98), respectively. The specificity was 95.9% (71/74), 100.0%(74/74) and 100.0% (74/74), respectively. The sensitivity of calretinin and WT1 for reactive mesothelium was 93.2% (69/74) and 79.7% (59/74), respectively. The specificity was 96.9% (95/98) and 100.0% (98/98), respectively. The sensitivity of GLUT1, calretinin and WT1 for mesothelioma was 9/10, 9/10 and 7/10. The reactivity of GLUT1, CDX2, Villin, calretinin and WT1 showed a significant difference (P<0.01) between adenocarcinoma cells and reactive mesothelium. The reactivity of GLUT1 showed a significant difference (P<0.01) between mesothelioma and reactive mesothelium. Conclusions: The optimal combination is a panel of GLUT1, CDX2, Villin, calretinin and WT1 for differential diagnosis between adenocarcinoma cells and reactive mesothelium in peritoneal fluid of patients with gastric cancer. Whereas GLUT1, calretinin and WT1 is the best for differential diagnosis between reactive mesothelium and mesothelioma in serous effusions.

Classification of Colorectal Cancer in Molecular Subtypes by Immunohistochemistry.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous disease, which can be categorized into distinct consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs). These subtypes differ in both clinical as well as biological properties. The gold-standard classification strategy relies on genome-wide expression data, which hampers widespread implementation. Here we describe an immunohistochemical (IHC) Mini Classifier, a practical tool that, in combination with microsatellite instability testing, delivers objective and accurate scoring to classify CRC patients into the main molecular disease subtypes. It is a robust immunohistochemical-based assay containing four specific stainings (FRMD6, ZEB1, HTR2B, and CDX2) in combination with cytokeratin. We also describe an online tool for classification of individual samples based on scoring parameters of these stainings.

Seromucinous component in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma as a histological predictor of prognosis.

OBJECTIVE: In 2014 World Health Organization criteria, seromucinous carcinoma was defined as a new histological subtype in ovarian carcinomas, but "seromucinous carcinoma" was not defined in endometrial carcinomas. The aim of this study was to identify seromucinous carcinoma resembling ovarian seromucinous carcinoma in endometrial carcinomas, and to evaluate the clinical significance for prognoses of the patients. METHODS: Central pathological review was conducted for patients with endometrioid carcinoma of the endometrium treated by primary surgery at our hospital between 1990 and 2013. RESULTS: Among 340 cases included in the study, no case had all tumor cells resembling ovarian seromucinous carcinoma in all specimens, and 31 cases (9.1%) had seromucinous component in combination with endometrioid carcinomas. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed seromucinous component had positive reactivity for cytokeratin (CK) 7, and negative reactivity for CK20 and caudal type homeobox 2 (CDX2) in all cases. Seromucinous component showed lower immunoreactivity of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor, compared with endometrioid carcinoma component. Progression-free survival of the cases with seromucinous component was better than those without seromucinous component (p=0.049). CONCLUSION: Seromucinous component was identified in approximately 10% of endometrioid carcinoma, and could be a histological predictor for prognosis.

CDX2 and LEF-1 expression in pilomatrical tumors and their utility in the diagnosis of pilomatrical carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The Wnt signaling pathway has been implicated in the pathogenesis of pilomatrical tumors. Lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF-1) is a downstream component of this pathway, and Caudal-related homeobox transcription factor 2 (CDX2) has been postulated to regulate it, but little is known about expression of these transcription factors in pilomatrical tumors. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry for CDX2, ß-catenin, LEF-1, CK19, CK5, Special AT-rich sequence- binding protein 2 (SATB2), cadherin 17 and androgen receptor was performed on pilomatricomas (PMs) (N = 12), pilomatrical carcinomas (PMCAs) (N = 12) and non-pilomatrical cutaneous tumors (N = 18). RESULTS: PMs and PMCAs were positive for CDX2 (9/12 PMs, sensitivity = 75%, specificity = 100%; 11/12 PMCAs, sensitivity = 92%, specificity = 100%; P < 0.01), ß-catenin (12/12 PMs, sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 94%; 10/12 PMCAs, sensitivity = 83%, specificity = 94%; P < 0.01) and LEF-1 (12/12 PMs, sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 56%; 12/12 PMCAs, sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 56%; P < 0.01). CDX2 expression was commonly focal, within a discrete subpopulation of squamoid cells. The LEF-1 expression pattern was different and discernable between pilomatrical tumors (strong, diffuse) and non-pilomatrical tumors (weak, patchy). CONCLUSION: This study reaffirms the importance of the Wnt signaling pathway in the tumorigenesis of pilomatrical tumors, and this introduces CDX2 as a possible regulator and marker of pilomatrical tumorigenesis. LEF-1 and CDX2 performed at least as well as ß-catenin, if not better when taking into account expression pattern, as a diagnostic marker for PMCA, and should be considered in the workup of ambiguous primitive-appearing cutaneous tumors.

Diagnostic Utility of SATB2 in Metastatic Krukenberg Tumors of the Ovary: An Immunohistochemical Study of 70 Cases With Comparison to CDX2, CK7, CK20, Chromogranin, and Synaptophysin.

SATB2 is a sensitive marker for colorectal adenocarcinomas. No study has investigated its diagnostic utility in metastatic Krukenberg tumors (MKTs) of the ovary. Here we performed immunohistochemical staining SATB2 in 70 MKTs of various origins (stomach 27, colorectum 13, appendix 20 including 19 metastatic adenocarcinomas ex goblet cell carcinoids [AdexGCC] and 1 conventional poorly differentiated carcinoma with signet ring cells, breast 5, bladder 3, lung 2) to assess its diagnostic utility. We also compared SATB2 with CDX2, CK7, CK20, chromogranin, and synaptophysin in MKTs of gastric origin (MKTs-stomach), those of colorectal origin (MKTs-colorectum) and those due to appendiceal AdexGCCs (MKT-AdexGCCs) for their sensitivity and specificity to distinguish these tumors. SATB2 staining was seen in 1/27 (4%) MKTs-stomach (40% cells), 7/13 (54%) MKTs-colorectum (mean: 17% cells, median: 7%, range: 2% to 60%), and 19/19 (100%) of MKT-AdexGCCs (mean: 97% cells, median: 100%, range: 80% to 100%) (P<0.01 between any two). SATB2 staining was seen in 1/1 metastatic appendiceal poorly differentiated carcinoma with signet ring cells (5% cells), 1/3 MKTs of bladder origin (60% cells), 0/2 MKTs of pulmonary origin, and 1/5 MKTs of breast origin (10% cells). SATB2 staining was diffuse strong in MKT-AdexGCCs whereas in other MKTs it was focal and weak in the signet ring and nonsignet ring nonglandular cells and from focal weak to diffuse strong in well-formed glands. MKTs-stomach, MKTs-colorectum, and MKT-AdexGCCs showed no significant staining difference in CDX2 (100%, 100%, 100% cases, respectively; P=1.0), CK20 (96%, 100%, 100%, respectively; P=1.0), chromogranin (59%, 31%, 63%, respectively; P>0.05) or synaptophysin (59%, 63%, 84%, respectively; P>0.05) but they had significant difference in CK7 staining (93%, 8%, 42%, respectively; P<0.05). Among these 6 markers, SATB2 is the best one to distinguish MKT-AdexGCCs from MKTs-stomach (100% sensitivity, 96% specificity) and MKTs-colorectum (100% sensitivity and 100% specificity if staining more than 75% tumor cells as the cutoff). In distinguishing MKTs-stomach from MKTs-colorectum, SATB2 is not as good as CK7 which is the best marker. Our results indicate that SATB2 is a highly sensitive marker (100% sensitivity) for metastatic MKT-AdexGCCs with high specificity (100% specificity when showing strong staining in at least 75% cells) among MKTs. SATB2 is a useful marker for determining the primary sites of MKTs of the ovary.

Prognostic significance of CDX2 immunoexpression in poorly differentiated clusters of colorectal carcinoma.

CDX2 is a transcription factor that acts as a tumor suppressor in colorectal cancer (CRC). Its loss triggers metastatic process and tumor progression; however, its prognostic role in patients with CRC is still controversial. Poorly differentiated clusters (PDCs) are aggregates of neoplastic cells which likely have high metastatic potential in CRC. In this study, we analyzed and compared CDX2 expression in PDC (CDX2-PDC) and corresponding main tumor (CDX2 main tumor) in 42 CRCs showing at least 10 PDC (PDC G3). Five of 42 CRCs (12%) were classified as CDX2 main tumor negative (4/5 were also PDC-CDX2 negative); all had tumor recurrence and died of CRC. Twenty nine of 42 cases were CDX2-PDC negative. Among CRC CDX2 main tumor positive, 15 had recurrences and 13 died from CRC; 13 and 11 of them, respectively, were CDX2-PDC negative. By assigning one point to CDX2 main tumor or CDX2-PDC positivity, we assessed CDX2-staining score for each case. Twelve cases had CDX2-staining score 2 (CDX2 positive in main tumor and PDC); 26 had score 1 (CDX2 positive in main tumor or PDC), and 4 had CDX2 score 0 (CDX2 negative in main tumor and PDC). In our patients, CDX2-staining score had higher prognostic value compared to CDX2 main tumor or CDX2-PDC alone. In addition, it represented a significant and independent prognostic variable for disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Our findings suggest that, although loss of CDX2 in the main tumor identifies high-risk patients with high specificity, CDX2-PDC should also be considered in CDX2 main tumor positive cases to predict prognosis.