Utilization and safety of off-label prothrombin complex concentrate (four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate) in a surgical population.

The aim of this study is to evaluate and describe the utilization and safety of 4F-PCC in a nonanticoagulated, surgical patient population at an academic, tertiary care center. This retrospective, single-center chart review evaluated nonanticoagulated adult patients at least 18 years of age who had at least one dose of 4F-PCC administered between 1 January 2017 and 30 September 2022 for a surgical or peri-procedural indication. Hemostatic efficacy following 4F-PCC administration was the primary outcome, assessed by subsequent blood product administration and hemoglobin and hematocrit reduction. Secondary outcomes included an assessment of thrombotic events within 30 days post-4F-PCC administration, in-hospital mortality, and the length of hospital stay. A total of 71 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 61 patients receiving 4F-PCC for cardiac surgery and 10 patients for other intraoperative or peri-procedural indications. The mean total 4F-PCC dose was 25.0 U/kg. For the primary outcome of hemostatic efficacy, 81% of patients had excellent hemostasis; however, blood product administration was reported in 95.8% of patients post-4F-PCC. Thromboembolic events occurred in 10 (14.1%) patients and 21.1% of patients expired prior to discharge in the total cohort. Off-label 4F-PCC use in nonanticoagulated patients is reported despite a lack of robust guidance for use. Following 4F-PCC administration, hemostatic efficacy based on hemoglobin and hematocrit changes was observed; however, blood product use was frequent, and 4F-PCC administration was not without risks, including thromboembolic complications such deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism, and stroke. Further studies are needed to validate the off-label administration of 4F-PCC in nonanticoagulated patients.

Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate versus andexanet alfa for direct oral anticoagulant reversal.

BACKGROUND: Optimal reversal agent for direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)-associated major bleeding has not been described. Before the approval of andexanet alfa (AA) in 2018, 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) was recommended by major guidelines. Currently, AA is recommended as the first-line agent by most guidelines. With a paucity of literature comparing the 2 agents, there is clinical value in assessing hemostatic efficacy and safety of the 2 agents. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate hemostatic efficacy and safety of AA and 4F-PCC in all DOAC-associated major bleedings. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective chart review was performed of adult subjects who were admitted for a DOAC-associated major bleeding and received 4F-PCC from February 2018 to May 2019 or AA from May 2019 to September 2021. Some of the exclusion criteria included not receiving a DOAC, receiving multiple reversal agents during the same hospitalization, receiving reversal for any nonmajor bleeding indication, and not receiving the full dose of a reversal agent. The primary outcome was hemostatic efficacy 24 hours after the end of the reversal agent administration. Secondary outcomes included time to administration, hospital mortality, length of stay, need for surgery, and need for additional blood product. Safety outcome was incidence of thrombotic events. RESULTS: There were 99 subjects included in the 4F-PCC group and 84 subjects in the AA group. Hemostatic efficacy was achieved in 69 subjects (69.7%) in the 4F-PCC group and 63 subjects (75%) in the AA group (P = 0.927). In-hospital mortality was seen in 20 subjects (20.2%) in the 4F-PCC group and 10 subjects (11.9%) in the AA group. Thrombotic events were seen in 7 subjects (7.1%) in the 4F-PCC group and 6 subjects (7.1%) in the AA group. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in hemostatic efficacy, in-hospital mortality, and number of thrombotic events between 4F-PCC and AA.

Retrospective Comparison of Recombinant Activated Factor VII Versus 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Cardiac Surgical Patients.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the incidences of postoperative thrombotic complications, transfusion of blood products, and chest tube output in congenital cardiac surgical patients who received either recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) or 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC). DESIGN: We performed a retrospective study. SETTING: Patients who underwent surgery at a tertiary academic hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Pediatric patients who underwent cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data were obtained from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium databases, as well as from manual chart review. Adjusted p values were obtained from multivariate regression using age (days), surgeon (number), cardiopulmonary bypass time (minutes), and need for deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (yes/no). A total of 55 patients were included in the 4F-PCC group, and 89 in the rFVIIa group. The median dose of rFVIIa was 77 mcg/kg (46-88), and the median dose of 4F-PCC was 31 IU/kg (24-43). The incidences of thrombotic complications were 8% in the 4F-PCC group and 30% in the rFVIIa group (adjusted p = 0.023). No difference was reported between the groups regarding chest tube output on days 1 and 2 or transfusion of blood products. Using a sensitivity analysis with propensity matching, the incidence of thrombosis was 10% in the 4F-PCC group (n = 38), and 31% in the rFVIIa group (n = 39) (p = 0.036). No difference was reported in terms of bleeding or transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study suggested that the administration of rFVIIa was associated with a higher risk of thrombotic complications when compared to 4F-PCC, without benefits in terms of bleeding and transfusions.

Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate in adjunct to whole blood in trauma-related hemorrhage: Does whole blood replace the need for factors?

BACKGROUND: The use of whole blood (WB) for the treatment of hemorrhagic shock and coagulopathy is increasing in civilian trauma patients. Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4-PCC) in adjunct to component therapy showed improved outcomes in trauma patients. Our study aims to evaluate the outcomes of trauma patients who received 4-PCC and WB (4-PCC-WB) compared with WB alone. METHODS: We performed a 3-year (2015-2017) analysis of the American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Improvement Program database. All adult (age, ≥18 years) trauma patients who received WB were included. We excluded patients who were on preinjury anticoagulants. Patients were stratified into two groups, 4-PCC-WB versus WB alone, and matched in a 1:2 ratio using propensity score matching. Outcome measures were packed red blood cells, plasma, platelets, and cryoprecipitate transfused, in-hospital complications, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) among survivors, and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 252 patients (4-PCC-WB, 84; WB alone, 168) were matched. The mean ± SD age was 47 ± 21 years, 63% were males, median Injury Severity Score was 30 (21-40), and 87% had blunt injuries. Patients who received 4-PCC-WB had decreased requirement for packed red blood cell (8 U vs. 10 U, p = 0.04) and fresh frozen plasma (6 U vs. 8 U, p = 0.01) transfusion, lower rates of acute kidney injury (p = 0.03), and ICU LOS (5 days vs. 8 days, p = 0.01) compared with WB alone. There was no difference in the platelet transfusion (p = 0.19), cryoprecipitate transfusion (p = 0.37), hospital LOS (p = 0.72), and in-hospital mortality (p = 0.72) between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that the use of 4-PCC as an adjunct to WB is associated with a reduction in transfusion requirements and ICU LOS compared with WB alone in the resuscitation of trauma patients. Further studies are required to evaluate the role of PCC with WB in the resuscitation of trauma patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level III.

Bleeder With a Clot: Thrombosis Following Treatment of Bleeding in a Child With Severe Hemophilia B.

A 16-year-old boy with severe hemophilia B and minimal bleeding manifestations in his early childhood presented with gastrointestinal bleeding at 11 years of age. Following administration of prothrombin complex concentrate, he developed peripheral venous thrombosis and cerebral sinovenous thrombosis, posing a management dilemma. His cerebral sinovenous thrombosis resolved spontaneously, proving watchful waiting to be a useful strategy. He developed spontaneous intracranial bleed at 14 years of age for which he was treated with factor IX concentrate and commenced on prophylaxis. We discuss the factors contributing to genotype-phenotype dissonance in severe hemophilia and considerations before commencing prophylaxis in such cases.

Safety and effectiveness of a four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for vitamin K antagonist reversal following a fixed-dose strategy.

OBJECTIVES: Early reversal of anticoagulation improves outcomes in major bleeding and emergency surgery. To reverse vitamin K antagonists (VKA), vitamin K in addition to prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) is recommended. Dosing recommendations for VKA reversal provided by the manufacturer are 25-50 IU/kg depending on the baseline international normalised ratio (INR). Nevertheless, we recommend an initial fixed dose of 1000 IU, and additional 500 IU doses evaluated on a case-by-case basis. As there is a paucity of clinical data demonstrating the efficacy and safety of this strategy, we designed this study to assess the effectiveness and safety of a four-factor (4F)-PCC for VKA reversal following a fixed-dose strategy. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of adult patients who received 4F-PCC for VKA reversal. The primary outcome was INR correction. INR correction was achieved if the first INR draw after 4F-PCC was ≤1.5. Safety outcome was any confirmed thromboembolic event within 3 months after 4F-PCC. Secondary outcomes included activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) correction, as well as haemostatic effectiveness for bleeding patients. RESULTS: A total of 145 patients were included: 106 (73.1%) in the bleeding group and 39 (26.9%) in the emergency surgery group. The INR target was reached in 102 (70.3%) patients (p<0.0001). In one case, a thromboembolic complication was possibly related to 4F-PCC. The aPTT ratio target was reached in 113 (77.9%) patients (p<0.0001), and 79 of the 106 (74.5%) patients reversed for bleeding achieved haemostatic effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: After 4F-PCC, the majority of patients achieved the target INR, meaning 4F-PCC is a useful modality for rapid INR reduction. The safety profile may be considered acceptable. Fixed-dose 4F-PCC was able to restore haemostasis rapidly while minimising the risk of adverse events and optimising available resources.

Efficacy and safety of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate fixed, weight-based dosing for reversal of warfarin anticoagulation.

BACKGROUND: Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) is widely used for urgent reversal of anticoagulation with warfarin, but the optimal 4F-PCC dosing approach is unknown. Herein, we sought to determine the efficacy of a novel fixed, weight-based dosing nomogram. METHODS: We retrospectively studied consecutive adult patients receiving fixed, weight-based 4F-PCC dosing for warfarin reversal between 30 April 2009 and 31 December 2010. The primary outcome was reversal of warfarin anticoagulation, defined as INR ≤1.5 within 6 h. Secondary outcome was the occurrence of thromboembolic events. RESULTS: A total of 227 patients (56% male), with a median age of 74 years and a median weight of 76kg were evaluated. The most common indications for 4F-PCC were active bleeding (37.4%: 12.7% intracranial, 12.3% gastrointestinal, 4.0% trauma, 8.4% other), reversal for a procedure (22.0%), reversal for surgery (29.5%) or other (11.1%). 66.1% of patients achieved an INR ≤1.5 within 6 h of 4F-PCC administration. 95.0% (57/60) of patients completed a planned procedure and 95.7% (67/70) of patients completed a planned surgery. The median baseline INR was 2.9 (1.5-10) and decreased significantly to a median of 1.3 (1.0-3.7) (p < .001) post-4F-PCC administration. There was no statistically significant difference in response to a fixed, weight-based dose of 4F-PCC based on pre-PCC INR, as long as the pre-treatment INR was ≤ 4.5. Although the majority of patients in our study (99%) received doses over 1000IU, rates of thrombosis were low (1.8%). CONCLUSION: Fixed, weight-based dosing of 4F-PCC is effective for reversing warfarin anticoagulation in patients with a pre-dosing INR ≤ 4.5.

Immune Responses to Plasma-Derived Versus Recombinant FVIII Products.

The most severe side effect of hemophilia treatment is the inhibitor development occurring in 30% of patients, during the earliest stages of treatment with factor (F)VIII concentrates. These catastrophic immune responses rapidly inactivate the infused FVIII, rendering the treatment ineffective. This complication is associated with a substantial morbidity and mortality. The risk factors involved in the onset of the inhibitors are both genetic and environmental. The source of FVIII products, i.e. plasma-derived or recombinant FVIII products, is considered one of the most relevant factors for inhibitor development. Numerous studies in the literature report conflicting data on the different immunogenicity of the products. The SIPPET randomized trial showed an increased in the inhibitor rate in patients using recombinant FVIII products than those receiving plasma-derived products in the first exposure days. The SIPPET randomized trial showed an increase in the inhibitor rate in patients using recombinant FVIII products compared to those treated with plasma-derived products in the first days of exposure. The potential increase in the immunogenicity of recombinant products can be attributed to several factors such as: the different post-translational modification in different cell lines, the presence of protein aggregates, and the role played by the chaperon protein of FVIII, the von Willebrand factor, which modulates the uptake of FVIII by antigen presenting cells (APCs). Furthermore, the presence of non-neutralizing antibodies against FVIII has shown to be in increased inhibitor development as demonstrated in a sub-analysis of the SIPPET study. In addition, the presence of the specific subclasses of the immunoglobulins may also be an important biomarker to indicate whether the inhibitor will evolve into a persistent neutralizing antibody or a transient one that would disappear without any specific treatment. Recently, the availability of novel non-replacement therapies as well as emicizumab, administered by weekly subcutaneous infusion, have significantly changed the quality of life of patients with inhibitors showing a considerable reduction of the annual bleeding rate and in most patients the absence of bleeding. Although, these novel drugs improve patients' quality of life, they do not abolish the need to infuse FVIII during acute bleeding or surgery. Therefore, the issue of immunogenicity against FVIII still remains an important side effect of hemophilia treatment.

Prothrombin Complex Concentrate before Urgent Surgery in Patients Treated with Rivaroxaban and Apixaban.

INTRODUCTION: Patients treated with direct Xa inhibitors may require urgent surgery. Administration of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) in this setting is common; however, it is based on limited experience in healthy volunteers. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the population receiving PCC for apixaban/rivaroxaban reversal prior to an urgent surgery and evaluate its efficacy and safety. METHODS: This was a retrospective study in 2 tertiary hospitals. Bleeding was evaluated based on surgical reports, hemoglobin drop, and the use of blood products or additional PCC during 48 h. Safety measures were thrombotic complications and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients aged 80.7 ± 9 years, treated with apixaban (39.63%) or rivaroxaban (23.37%), received PCC before an urgent surgery/procedure. Most underwent abdominal operation (61%), orthopedic surgery (13%), or transhepatic cholecystostomy insertion (10%). Bleeding during surgery was reported in 3 patients (5%), no patient required additional PCC, and 16 patients (26%) received packed cells (median: 1 unit, range: 1-5). The 30-day mortality and thrombosis rates were 21% (n = 13) and 3% (n = 2), respectively. The cause of death was related to the primary disease, most commonly sepsis. No patient died due to bleeding/thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the use of PCC to achieve hemostasis in patients treated with Xa inhibitors prior to an urgent surgery.

A pragmatic pilot phase II randomised controlled trial of prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC) versus fresh frozen plasma (FFP) in adult patients who are undergoing heart surgery (PROPHESY).

BACKGROUND: Fresh frozen plasma (FFP) is the accepted standard treatment for clotting factor replacement in bleeding patients during or immediately after cardiac surgery. In the United Kingdom prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) is not licensed in this setting, although it is being used in Europe because it has a higher concentration of clotting factor levels, and it can be administered rapidly and in small volume, resulting in less volume overload during cardiac surgery. METHODS: PROPHESY is a pragmatic, single-centre, open-label, randomised, controlled pilot trial that will assess whether it is feasible to perform a large trial in the future that will compare PCC versus FFP in patients who are bleeding (not on warfarin) and who require blood transfusion. Over a 15-month period, 50 patients will be randomised to PCC versus FFP if they develop active bleeding within 24 h of cardiac surgery and for whom the clinician has decided to administer FFP for treatment of bleeding. Standard laboratory and point-of-care assessments will be performed as per routine practice, and additional research blood samples will be taken at three time points to assess haemostasis. Subjects will be assessed daily up to hospital discharge or 30 days or death (whichever occurs first) and will be seen in follow-up for 90 days after surgery to assess for thromboembolic complications and hospital re-admission since discharge. Quality-of-life assessment will be performed pre-surgery and at 90 days post-surgery. We will also perform qualitative research with clinical experts and patients to explore the understanding of and experience with the interventions, as well as adherence to study procedures and protocol. DISCUSSION: There have been no randomised controlled trials that have compared the safety and efficacy of FFP versus PCC in cardiac surgery patients who are bleeding. This pilot study will assess if individual components of a large trial are deliverable to assess the safety and efficacy of the two blood products in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT, 2018-003041-41; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03715348. Registered on 29 July 2018.

Outcome of CARE: a 6-year national registry of acquired haemophilia A in China.

Acquired haemophilia A (AHA) is a rare haemorrhagic disorder caused by autoantibodies directed against the functional epitopes of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). Its management relies on prompt diagnosis, control of bleeding and eradication of the inhibitor by immunosuppression. China Acquired Hemophilia Registry (CARE), a nationwide multicentre registry, was intended to survey the status of AHA and standardize its diagnosis and therapy in China. One hundred and eighty-seven registered patients had an average age of 52 years. Diagnosis was delayed in 46·5% patients. There was a significant delay from diagnosis to immunosuppressive therapy in 68·3% patients. Bleeding control was significantly higher in patients treated with prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) versus FVIII replacement therapy (84·6% vs. 34·4%; P < 0·001). Inhibitor eradication with a combination of steroids and cyclophosphamide showed a higher partial remission (PR) rate (92·2% vs. 70·3%) and stable complete remission (CR) rate (82·8% vs. 48·6%) than with steroids alone. Logistic regression model showed age and malignancy were significantly related to survival at final follow-up. The mean age for the survivors [51 years (IQR, 35-65 years)] was significantly lower than that of the non-survivors [79 years (IQR, 67-86 years)] (P < 0·001). Overall survival was higher in non-malignancy group than malignancy group (94·9% vs. 70%) (OR = 1·313; 95% CI, 0·913-1·889, P = 0·015).

Comparative Analysis of Prothrombin Complex Concentrate and Fresh Frozen Plasma in Coronary Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggested that prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) might be more effective than fresh frozen plasma (FFP) to reduce red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirement after cardiac surgery. METHODS: This is a comparative analysis of 416 patients who received FFP postoperatively and 119 patients who received PCC with or without FFP after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). RESULTS: Mixed-effects regression analyses adjusted for multiple covariates and participating centres showed that PCC significantly decreased RBC transfusion (67.2% vs. 87.5%, adjusted OR 0.319, 95%CI 0.136-0.752) and platelet transfusion requirements (11.8% vs. 45.2%, adjusted OR 0.238, 95%CI 0.097-0.566) compared with FFP. The PCC cohort received a mean of 2.7±3.7 (median, 2.0, IQR 4) units of RBC and the FFP cohort received a mean of 4.9±6.3 (median, 3.0, IQR 4) units of RBC (adjusted coefficient, -1.926, 95%CI -3.357-0.494). The use of PCC increased the risk of KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) acute kidney injury (41.4% vs. 28.2%, adjusted OR 2.300, 1.203-4.400), but not of KDIGO acute kidney injury stage 3 (6.0% vs. 8.0%, OR 0.850, 95%CI 0.258-2.796) when compared with the FFP cohort. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the use of PCC compared with FFP may reduce the need of blood transfusion after CABG.

Effectiveness and Safety of 4-factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate (4PCC) in Neonates With Intractable Bleeding or Severe Coagulation Disturbances: A Retrospective Study of 37 Cases.

BACKGROUND: To date, clinical experience with prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) in the neonatal population has been limited. AIM: The objective of this study was to describe our experience regarding the effectiveness and safety of PCC administration in newborns with severe bleeding or coagulopathy resistant to conventional therapy. METHODOLOGY: We retrospectively analyzed data from 37 neonates with intractable bleeding or severe coagulation disturbances. All patients received intravenous bolus administration of 20 or 30 u/kg of PCC per dose, as a rescue procedure. RESULTS: Hemostasis was achieved in the majority of neonates and we observed statistically significant improvement in prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, and activated partial thromboplastin time (P<0.001, P=0.044, P<0.001, respectively). Thirteen neonates survived, whereas 24 did not survive. In those who survived, PCC had been administered earlier (<24 h) in the disease process compared with those who died (P=0.043). Neither acute adverse events nor thromboembolic complications were observed in all neonates. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, PCC seemed to be a safe and effective intervention for hemostasis and early intervention was more effective as a rescue therapy, without any adverse event. Further prospective controlled trials are required to determine optimal dose and timing of PCC administration in neonates.

Results of Octaplex for reversal of warfarin anticoagulation in patients with hip fracture.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hip fracture who present anticoagulated with warfarin often require reversal of anticoagulation for safe hip fracture surgery. Vitamin K is typically administered for this, but requires 24-48 hours for maximal effect. These patients have an increased delay to surgery and increased mortality. Octaplex is a prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) that reverses warfarin anticoagulation in less than an hour. This study assesses the effectiveness and safety of Octaplex for reversal of warfarin anticoagulation for hip fracture surgery. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of all patients with hip fracture in Calgary who received Octaplex between 2009 and 2015. Timing of admission, Octaplex administration and hip fracture surgery were recorded. Mortality and cardiac, thrombotic and orthopedic complications were assessed. RESULTS: Median time from Octaplex administration to an international normalized ratio of 1.4 or lower was 1.1 hours. The median time from admission to surgery was 22 hours. Thirty-day mortality was 15.2%, with 4 cases of cardiac arrest and 1 respiratory arrest. Patients who received both Octaplex and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) had a lower rate of 30-day survival than those who received only Octaplex (95.7% v. 60.0%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: There were significant rates of cardiac events and 30-day mortality among patients who received Octaplex, but this is unsurprising in this population with multiple medical comorbidities. We caution against administrering both FFP and a PCC in patients for warfarin reversal. Octaplex is effective for rapidly reversing warfarin anticoagulation and reducing delays to hip fracture surgery. Further study comparing Octaplex to reversal using only vitamin K is required.

CONTEXTE: Les patients avec fracture de la hanche qui sont sous anticoagulothérapie par warfarine au moment de consulter ont souvent besoin qu'on inverse leur anticoagulation pour être opérés sans danger. La vitamine K est généralement administrée à cette fin, mais il lui faut de 24 à 48 heures pour exercer son plein effet. Chez ces patients, le délai est plus long avant la chirurgie et la mortalité est plus élevée. Octaplex est un concentré de complexe prothrombique (CCP) qui inverse l'anticoagulation due à la warfarine en moins d'une heure. Cette étude évalue l'efficacité et l'innocuité d'Octaplex pour l'inversion de l'anticoagulation due à la warfarine lors d'une chirurgie pour fracture de la hanche. MÉTHODES: Nous avons passé en revue les dossiers médicaux de tous les patients avec fracture de la hanche à Calgary qui ont reçu Octaplex entre 2009 et 2015. Nous avons enregistré le moment de l'admission, de l'administration d'Octaplex et de la chirurgie pour fracture de la hanche. Nous avons évalué la mortalité et les complications cardiaques, thrombotiques et orthopédiques. RÉSULTATS: L'intervalle médian entre l'administration d'Octaplex et l'obtention d'un ratio international normalisé de 1,4 ou moins a été de 1,1 heure. L'intervalle médian entre l'admission et la chirurgie a été de 22 heures. La mortalité à 30 jours a été de 15,2 %, incluant 4 arrêts cardiaques et 1 arrêt respiratoire. Les patients qui ont reçu Octaplex et du plasma frais congelé (PFC) ont eu un taux de survie à 30 jours moins élevé que ceux qui ont reçu Octaplex seulement (95,7 % c. 60,0 %, p = 0,002). CONCLUSION: On a observé des taux significatifs d'événements cardiaques et de mortalité à 30 jours chez les patients traités par Octaplex, mais cela est peu surprenant dans cette population présentant plusieurs comorbidités médicales. Nous formulons une mise en garde contre l'utilisation de PFC et d'un CCP chez les patients soumis à une inversion de l'effet de la warfarine. Octaplex est efficace pour inverser rapidement l'anticoagulation due à la warfarine et accélérer l'accès à la chirurgie pour fracture de la hanche. Il faudra approfondir la recherche et comparer l'inversion par Octaplex plutôt que par la vitamine K seulement.

Tolerability and effectiveness of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) for warfarin and non-warfarin reversals.

PURPOSE: Current guidelines favor 4F-PCC over plasma for warfarin reversal. Uncertainty remains on its thrombotic risk and hemostatic effectiveness when used for direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs), transplants, massive transfusion protocols (MTP), and non-anticoagulated patients. This study sought to evaluate the tolerability and effectiveness of 4F-PCC in a real-world setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of adults who received 4F-PCC from March 2014 to December 2015. The primary outcome was thromboembolic events within 14 days. The secondary outcome was hemostatic effectiveness within 24 h. RESULTS: The final analysis included 212 patients. Primary reversal indication was major bleed in 165 patients (77.8%) and emergent surgery in 47 patients (22.2%). Thromboembolism occurred in 22 patients (10.4%), more in emergent surgery than major bleed reversals (17% and 8.5%, respectively). MTP and heart transplant patients had the highest thromboembolic event rates (44.4% and 28.6%, respectively). Hemostatic effectiveness was 65.8% (68% in major bleed and 58.1% in emergent surgery). DOAC patients achieved hemostasis most often (78.9%). Administration of any reversal agent, major surgery within 14 days, and MTP activation were significant predictors of thromboembolism. CONCLUSIONS: Use of 4F-PCC in this real-world setting was associated with variable thromboembolic and hemostatic effectiveness rates based on the indication for reversal.

The role of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate in coagulopathy of trauma: A propensity matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Coagulopathy is a common complication after severe trauma. The efficacy of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4-PCC) as an adjunct to fresh frozen plasma (FFP) in reversal of coagulopathy of trauma (COT) has not been studied. The aim of our study is to compare 4-PCC + FFP versus FFP alone for the treatment of COT. METHODS: We reviewed all trauma patients older than 18 years who received PCC + FFP or FFP alone at our Level I trauma center from 2015 to 2016. We excluded patients on preinjury oral anticoagulants. Patients were divided into two groups (4-PCC + FFP: FFP alone) and were matched in a 1:2 ratio using propensity score matching for demographics, vital and injury parameters, and initial international normalized ratio (INR). COT was defined as admission INR > 1.5. Corrected INR was defined as an INR of 1.5 or less. Outcome measures were time to correction of INR, packed red blood cells units transfused, thromboembolic complications, and mortality. RESULTS: We analyzed 516 trauma patients, of which 120 patients (4-PCC + FFP: 40, FFP: 80) were matched. Mean age was 58 ± 20 years; 60% were male, median Injury Severity Score was 29 (14-38). Mechanism of injury was blunt in 87% patients. 4-PCC + FFP was associated with an accelerated correction of INR (373 minutes vs. 955 minutes; p = 0.001), a decrease in packed red blood cells units (7 units vs. 9 units; p = 0.04), and FFP units (5 units vs. 7 units; p = 0.03) transfused compared to FFP alone. 4-PCC + FFP was associated with a lower mortality (25% vs. 33% p = 0.04) compared with FFP alone; however, there was no difference in the thromboembolic complications (2.5% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.5) between the two groups. Administration of PCC + FFP led to an earlier correction of the INR compared with FFP alone. CONCLUSION: Results of our study demonstrated that the use of 4-PCC in conjunction with FFP is associated with the rapid reversal of INR and reduction in transfusion requirements as compared with FFP alone. Four-factor PCC as a component therapy along with FFP is superior to FFP alone for the reversal of COT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic studies, level IV.

Prothrombin complex concentrate and fatal thrombotic adverse events: A complication to keep in mind.

Thromboembolic events such as deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are well-known complications that can occur after prothrombin complex concentrate therapy. However, acute myocardial infarction is a very rare but potentially life-threatening complication that was exclusively described in patients with bleeding disorders who received chronic and recurrent concentrate infusions. We report the case of a 70 year-old male patient with cholangiocarcinoma who was admitted to our hospital with worsening fatigue and weakness. His stay was complicated by uncontrolled bleeding secondary to rivaroxaban use and advanced liver disease. By the end of the prothrombin complex concentrate infusion used to reverse his coagulopathy, patient developed ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock and passed away. This is the first reported case of acute myocardial infarction that occurs in a patient without hemophilia and after the first prothrombin complex concentrate infusion.

Protocolized warfarin reversal with 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate versus 3-factor prothrombin complex concentrate with recombinant factor VIIa.

INTRODUCTION: Life-threatening bleeding can complicate warfarin therapy. Rapid anticoagulant reversal via replacement of vitamin-K dependent clotting factors is essential for hemostasis. We compare two methods of rapid factor replacement for warfarin reversal. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of warfarin-treated patients experiencing life-threatening bleeding who received a reversal protocol comprised of 4F PCC or 3F PCC and rFVIIa was performed. Demographic, clinical and anticoagulant reversal information, and all adverse events attributed to warfarin reversal were recorded. RESULTS: 195 patients were included in final analysis. While baseline demographics were similar between groups, the 3F-PCC group had a longer ICU LOS and higher in-hospital mortality (p < .01, .01). Pre-reversal INR was similar between both groups, but post-reversal INR was significantly lower in the 3F-PCC group, 0.8 versus 1.3 (p < .01). Significantly more patients experienced thromboembolic complications in the 3F-PCC group than the 4F-PCC group (p < .01). Receipt of rFVIIa was significantly associated with thromboembolic complications. DISCUSSION: A 4F PCC reversal strategy is efficacious in INR reversal and provides lower thromboembolic risk as compared to 3F PCC with rFVIIa.

Rivaroxaban reversal with prothrombin complex concentrate or tranexamic acid in healthy volunteers.

Essentials Specific reversal agents for managing severe factor Xa inhibitor-associated bleeding are lacking. We assessed 4-factor-prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) and tranexamic acid (TXA). 4F-PCC, but not TXA, reduced the prothrombin time and increased endogenous thrombin potential. These agents may be viable options for reversal of therapeutic doses of rivaroxaban. SUMMARY: Background Oral activated factor X inhibitors such as rivaroxaban are widely used, but specific reversal agents are lacking. Although four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) and tranexamic acid (TXA) are sometimes used to manage serious bleeding, their efficacy is unknown. Prior studies in healthy subjects taking rivaroxaban revealed that 4F-PCC partially reverses the prolonged prothrombin time (PT), and fully restores the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP). The effect of TXA has not been evaluated. Methods In this double-blind, parallel-group study, 147 healthy volunteers given rivaroxaban 20 mg twice daily for 3 days were randomized after their morning dose on day 4 to receive intravenous 4F-PCC (50 IU kg-1 ), TXA (1.0 g), or saline. Standardized punch biopsies were performed at baseline and after 4F-PCC, TXA or saline administration. Reversal was assessed by measuring bleeding duration and bleeding volume at biopsy sites, and by determining the PT and ETP. Results As compared with saline, 4F-PCC partially reversed the PT and completely reversed the ETP, whereas TXA had no effect. Neither 4F-PCC nor TXA reduced bleeding duration or volume. All treatments were well tolerated, with no recorded adverse events. Conclusions Although 4F-PCC reduced the PT and increased the ETP in volunteers given supratherapeutic doses of rivaroxaban, neither 4F-PCC nor TXA influenced punch biopsy bleeding.