[Development of a Prognostic Model for Overall Survival Adult Patients with Core Binding Factor Acute Myeloid Leukaemia].

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the factors affecting overall survival (OS) of adult patients with core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) and establish a prediction model. METHODS: A total of 216 newly diagnosed patients with CBF-AML in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from May 2015 to July 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The 216 CBF-AML patients were divided into the training and the validation cohort at 7∶3 ratio. The Cox regression model was used to analyze the clinical factors affecting OS. Stepwise regression was used to establish the optimal model and the nomogram. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the model performance. RESULTS: Age(≥55 years old), peripheral blood blast(≥80%), fusion gene (AML1-ETO), KIT mutations were identified as independent adverse factors for OS. The area under the ROC curve at 3-year was 0.772 and 0.722 in the training cohort and validation cohort, respectively. The predicted value of the calibration curve is in good agreement with the measured value. DCA shows that this model performs better than a single factor. CONCLUSION: This prediction model is simple and feasible, and can effectively predict the OS of CBF-AML, and provide a basis for treatment decision.

Lower relapse incidence with haploidentical versus matched sibling or unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation for core-binding factor AML patients in CR2: A study from the Global Committee and the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is recommended for core-binding factor mutated (CBF) AML patients achieving second complete remission (CR2). However, approximately 20% of patients may relapse after transplant and donor preference remains unclear. We compared in this EBMT global multicenter registry-based analysis the allo-HCT outcomes using either haploidentical (Haplo), matched siblings donors (MSD), or 10/10 matched unrelated donors (MUD). Data from 865 de novo adult CBF AML patients in CR2 receiving allo-HCT in 227 EBMT centers from 2010 to 2022 were analyzed, in which 329 MSD, 374 MUD, and 162 Haplo-HCTs were included. For the entire cohort, 503 (58%) patients were inv(16)/CBFB-MYH11 and 362 patients (42%) were t(8;21)/RUNX1-RUNX1T1 AML. On multivariate analysis, Haplo-HCT was associated with a lower Relapse Incidence (RI) compared to either MSD (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.56, 95% CI 0.32-0.97; p < .05) or MUD (HR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.33-0.99, p < .05). No significant difference was observed among the 3 types of donors on LFS, OS and GRFS. CBF-AML with t(8;21) was associated with both higher RI (HR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.3-2.47; p < .01) and higher NRM (HR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.1-2.27; p < .01) than CBF-AML with inv(16), which led to worse LFS, OS and GRFS. To conclude, for CBF-AML patients in CR2, Haplo-HCTs were associated with a lower RI compared to MSD and MUD allo-HCTs. There was no difference on LFS, OS or GRFS. CBF AML patients with inv(16) had a better progonosis than those with t(8;21) after allo-HCT in CR2.

Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors analysis of core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia in real world.

BACKGROUND: Chromosomal translocations involving core binding factor (CBF) genes account for 15% of adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases in China. Despite being classified as favorable-risk by European Leukemia Net (ELN), CBF-AML patients have a 40% relapse rate. This study aims to analyze clinical characteristics and prognosis of CBF-AML, compare its subtypes (inv(16) and t(8;21)), and validate prognostic factors. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 149 AML patients (75 CBF-AML, 74 non-CBF) at Peking University First Hospital (March 2012-March 2022). RESULTS: CBF-AML patients have significantly lower disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.005) and higher non-relapse mortality (NRM) (p = 0.028) compared to non-CBF AML. inv (16) and t(8;21) show distinct co-occurring gene mutation patterns, with inv(16) being prone to central nervous system (CNS) leukemia. Multivariate analysis identifies age as a risk factor for overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS), kinase mutation as a risk factor for DFS and Recurrence, while WT1 mutation as a risk factor for OS and non relapse mortality (NRM) risk in t(8;21) AML. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) improves prognosis in low-risk t(8;21). CONCLUSION: Prognosis of CBF-AML is poorer than ELN guidelines suggest. inv(16) and (8;21) are separate entities with relatively poor prognoses, requiring rational risk stratification strategies. Allo-HSCT may benefit low-risk t(8;21), but further research is needed for conclusive evidence.

Drivers of deep molecular response and long-term outcomes in patients with core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.

A swimmer plot on clinical course of patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplant for core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.

Core-binding factor abnormalities involving chromosome 16 in acute myeloid leukaemia: prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Core-binding factor (CBF) abnormality-associated myeloid neoplasms incorporate acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) (CBF-AML) with translocation t(8;21)(q22;q22.1) (AML1/ETO fusion) and inv(16)(p13.1q22) or translocation t(16;16)(p13.1;q22) (CBFB/MYH11 fusion) abnormalities which confer a favourable prognosis following cytarabine-based induction chemotherapy. Accumulating evidence from the molecular studies have stratified CBF-AML into favourable and unfavourable subgroups based on the associated cooperating mutations that impact the outcome. We describe a case of acute myelomonocytic leukaemia with abnormal eosinophils (M4Eo) in a woman in her 20s who was found to have CBFß/MYH11 fusion along with mutated c-KIT (exon 17) and KRAS (exon 2) genes by next-generation sequencing. She had an aggressive clinical course following initiation of cytarabine-based induction chemotherapy. The underlying mutational landscape may significantly influence the biological behaviour of otherwise favourable risk of CBF-AML cases.

The core concepts of core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: Current considerations for prognosis and treatment.

Core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF AML), defined by t(8;21) or inv(16), is a subset of favorable risk AML. Despite its association with a high complete remission rate after induction and relatively good prognosis overall compared with other subtypes of AML, relapse risk after induction chemotherapy remains high. Optimizing treatment planning to promote recurrence free survival and increase the likelihood of survival after relapse is imperative to improving outcomes. Recent areas of research have included evaluation of the role of gemtuzumab in induction and consolidation, the relative benefit of increased cycles of high dose cytarabine in consolidation, the utility of hypomethylating agents and kinase inhibitors, and the most appropriate timing of stem cell transplant. Surveillance with measurable residual disease testing is increasingly being utilized for monitoring disease in remission, and ongoing investigation seeks to determine how to use this tool for early identification of patients who would benefit from proceeding to transplant. In this review, we outline the current therapeutic approach from diagnosis to relapse while highlighting the active areas of investigation in each stage of treatment.

Clinical impact of c-KIT and CEBPA mutations in 33 patients with corebinding factor (Non-M3) acute myeloid leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Corebinding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) is the most common cytogenetic subtype of pediatric AML. CBF-AML is associated with a relatively favorable outcome, although the relapse rate of approximately 40% indicates a high degree of clinical heterogeneity. The clinical impact of additional cytogenetic aberrations, including c-KIT and CEBPA mutations, in pediatric CBF-AML has not been well characterized, especially in the multi-ethnic region of Yunnan Province in China. METHODS: In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical features, gene mutations, and prognoses of 72 pediatric patients newly diagnosed with non-M3 AML in Kunming Children's Hospital, China, from January 1, 2015 to May 31, 2020. RESULTS: Of the 72 pediatric patients with AML, 46% (33/72) had CBF-AML. Thirteen patients with CBF-AML (39%) had c-KIT mutations, five (15%) had CEBPA mutations, and eleven (33.3%) had no other cytogenetic aberrations. The c-KIT mutations, resulting from single nucleotide substitutions and small insertions or deletions, occurred in exons 8 and 17. All of the CBF-AML-associated CEBPA mutations were single mutations and occurred in patients with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 fusion. We found no significant differences in the clinical data between CBF-AML patients with c-KIT or CEBPA mutations and CBF-AML patients without other aberrations, and no prognostic significance was established for these mutations. CONCLUSION: Our study is the first to report the clinical impact of c-KIT and CEBPA mutations in pediatric patients with non-M3 CBF-AML from the multi-ethnic Yunnan Province, China. c-KIT and CEBPA mutations occurred at a higher frequency in CBF-AML cases and were associated with unique clinical characteristics; however, no potential molecular prognostic markers were identified.

Identification and in silico analysis of noval alteration Arg420Gly in KIT proto oncogene among acute myeloid leukemia patients.

A number of studies have reported frequent incidence of c-kit gene mutations in association with core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML). These genetic changes have become important prognostic predictors in patients with abnormal karyotype. Aim of this study was the detection of nucleotide alterations in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia patients for three exons of c-kit gene, including cytogenetically normal patients. Thirty-one de novo AML patients were screened for any possible variations in exon 8, 11 and 17 sequences of c-kit proto-oncogene leading to amino acid substitutions or frame shift. Sanger sequencing method was employed followed by sequence analysis. Mutation data was then correlated with clinical and hematological parameters of patients and prognostic significance of genetic changes was assessed as well. The computational tools were then used to further understand the extent of damage caused by these mutations to c-kit protein. Fifteen (48.4%) mutant patients were observed with single, double or multiple mutations in one, two or all three exons studied. The analysis revealed eight new alterations which were not reported previously. Significant variation among mutant and non-mutant group of patients was observed with respect to FAB subtypes (x2 = 12.524, p = 0.029), Spleen size (x2 = 4.288, p = 0.038) and Red blood cell count (x2 = 8.447, p = 0.007). The survival analysis indicates poor overall and event free survival outcomes in mutant individuals. Furthermore, the in silico analysis suggests that changes in nucleotide sequences can possibly damage the protein structure and effect it's function. This study emphasizes the need to consider screening of c-kit gene alterations not only in CBF-AML but in cytogenetically normal AML patients as well. In current investigation the effect of mutation Arg420Gly on structure and function of c-kit protein was investigated, as this was the most observed substitution in present cohort. Various bioinformatics tools and techniques were employed, which determined that Arg420Gly is possibly non-pathogenic mutation.

Retrospective comparison of survival and responses to Fludarabine, Cytarabine, GCSF (FLAG) in combination with gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) or Idarubicin (IDA) in patients with newly diagnosed core binding factor (CBF) acute myelogenous leukemia: MD Anderson experience in 174 patients.

Fludarabine, cytarabine, GCSF (FLAG)-based induction/consolidation results in high remission rates in core binding factor (CBF) acute myelogenous leukemia. We treated 174 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed CBF-AML in a prospective clinical trial of FLAG-based induction/consolidation in combination with gemtuzumab ozogamicin (FLAG-GO; N = 65) or in combination with idarubicin (FLAG-IDA; N = 109). The 5 year RFS in the FLAG-GO cohort was significantly better than the FLAG-IDA cohort, 78% versus 59%, respectively (p-value = .02). In multivariate analysis for RFS, age (p = .0001), FLAG-GO regimen (p = .04), 4 log reduction in CBF-related fusion transcript by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in bone marrow samples at end of consolidation therapy (p = .03), and additional cytogenetic abnormalities (p = .03) were significant variables. Lower age (p = .0001) and 3 log or more transcript reduction at end of induction (p = .04) were significant variables predicting for better overall survival (OS), while there was strong trend for better OS with FLAG-GO (p = .06) regimen. FLAG-GO regimen was superior in optimal disease specific fusion transcript reduction at end of induction (p = .002), mid-consolidation (p < .01), and end of consolidation (p < .001) therapy. Induction/consolidation with FLAG-GO regimen results in better clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed patients with CBF-AML compared to FLAG-IDA and achieves deeper molecular clearance by qPCR assessment of the fusion transcripts.

Combination of KIT and FLT3-ITD mutation status with minimal residual disease levels guides treatment strategy for adult patients with inv(16) acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission.

Although several studies have investigated the benefits of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for patients with inv (16) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1) individually stratified by KIT or FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutation status or minimal residual disease (MRD) levels, evaluation based on the combination of mutation status and MRD levels remains absent. This study included 157 adult patients with inv (16) AML who were consecutively diagnosed and receiving treatment at our center. A total of 50 (31.6%) patients had KIT mutations (KITMU ), and the risk of relapse was significantly higher in patients with KITMU than in patients with KITWT (p < 0.001). A total of 12 patients (7.6%) had FLT3-ITD, and FLT3-ITD+ tended to be related to a higher risk of relapse (p = 0.14). KITMU , FLT3-ITD and MRD3-H (beta subunit of core binding factor-myosin heavy chain 11 levels >0.2% after course 2 of consolidation therapy) were independent adverse prognostic factors for relapse with patients who received allo-HSCT at CR1 were censored at the time of transplantation. After combination, patients were categorized into molecularly defined high-risk (M-HR; KITMU or FLT3-ITD+ with MRD3-H; n = 30), low-risk (M-LR; KITWT and FLT3-ITD- with MRD3-L; n = 45) and intermediate-risk (M-IR; others; n = 70) groups. For the M-HR group, allo-HSCT significantly improved both cumulative incidence of relapse cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and overall survival (OS) (11.1% vs. 92.6%, p < 0.001; 90.0% vs. 34.1%, p = 0.019). For the M-IR group, allo-HSCT significantly improved CIR but did not affect OS (14.1% vs. 62.2%, p = 0.0004; 73.3% vs. 68.3%, p = 0.43). For the M-LR group, allo-HSCT had no significant effect on both CIR and OS (0% vs. 35.1%, p = 0.31; 100% vs. 78.8%, p = 0.22). Therefore, the combination of KIT and FLT3-ITD mutation status with MRD levels may identify inv (16) AML patients with high-risk who can benefit from allo-HSCT in CR1.

Activity of decitabine as maintenance therapy in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Posttherapy measurable residual disease (MRD) positivity in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) is associated with shorter relapse-free survival (RFS). Elimination of MRD measured via quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRTPCR) for disease specific transcripts can potentially lead to better outcomes in CBF-AML. METHODS: We prospectively monitored the MRD using qRTPCR and flow cytometry on bone marrow samples in patients with newly diagnosed CBF-AML who received decitabine (DAC) maintenance therapy after fludarabine/cytarabine/G-CSF (FLAG)-based induction/consolidation regimen. Negative qRTPCR (CMR) was defined as fusion transcript <0.01%. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients with CBF-AML including 14 with t(8;21) and 17 with inv(16) received parenteral DAC as maintenance therapy. Fifteen patients (48.3%) had completed FLAG-based induction/consolidation but with positive MRD (0.35%, range = 0.01%-0.91%) (Group 1). Sixteen patients (51.7%) could not complete recommended consolidations with FLAG-based regimen (due to older age or complications) and were switched to DAC maintenance (Group 2). In Group 2, eight patients (50%) had undetectable MRD (Group 2A) (all had qRTPCR ≤ 0.01%) and the other eight patients (50%) had residual fusion product by qRTPCR (0.1%, range = 0.02%-0.36%) (Group 2B) prior to starting DAC. Amongst the 23 patients who had a PCR ≥ 0.01% before maintenance therapy (Groups 1 and 2B), 12 patients (52%) attained a CMR as their best response (responders). The median pre-DAC qRTPCR amongst responders were 0.03% compared to 0.14% in nonresponders (p = .002). The median estimated molecular RFS amongst responders were 93.9 months. At a median follow-up of 59.3 months (13.2-106 months) from DAC initiation, 16 patients (51.6%) had to be initiated on a second line of therapy (40%, 25%, and 100% patients, respectively, in Groups1, 2A, and 2B). The median estimated time to new treatment between responders was 112.4 versus 5.8 months in nonresponders (hazard ratio = 0.16, 95% confidence interval = 0.04-0.54); however, there were no difference in overall survival between these groups (p = .37). CONCLUSION: DAC is an effective maintenance therapy for CBF-AML patients with persistent fusion transcript at a low level after FLAG-based regimen. Attainment of CMR with DAC maintenance can lead to long-term remission in patients who have persistent MRD positive after FLAG-based regimen or are unable to receive the full course of consolidation therapy.

The Prognostic Significance of c-KIT Mutations in Core Binding Factor Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Many recurrent mutations are encountered in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) which may affect the prognosis. Approximately 20 to 45% of CBF-AML patients have KIT mutations which are having poor prognosis and high incidence of relapse. There is still insufficient data to categorize the patients with c-kit mutation into which risk group and there is a debate around whether Tyrosine kinase inhibitors can decrease the relapse risk and improve the prognosis of those patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was conducted throughout a period of 3 years, where 102 CBF-AML were enrolled in our study. We analyzed the incidence of c-KIT exon 8 and 17 D816V mutations in CBF-AML patients and studied the prognosis. RESULTS: The prevalence of CBF-AML was 102 of 989 (10.3%), 13.7% and 8.7% in pediatrics and adults' groups respectively. c-KIT fragment mutation analysis revealed a mutant form in 27 of 102 (26.5%) patients. Exon 8 mutation was found in 4 of 40 pediatric and 2 of 62 adult patients, while exon 17 mutation was found in 9 of 40 pediatric and 12 of 62 adult patients. The c-KIT mutations was more common in t(8;21). There was no significant relationship between c-kit mutation and CR rates, while there was a significant inferior overall, disease free as well as progression free survival in the c-KIT mutant patients as compared to the wild group (P value .045, .036 and .024 respectively) in the pediatric group, however, this significance was not evident in the adults' group. CONCLUSION: According to our study, the results may suggest c-KIT mutation as a poor risk factor in pediatric CBF-AML.

Characteristics and outcome of patients with core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia and FLT3-ITD: results from an international collaborative study.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of FLT3-ITD in core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBFAML) in an international, multicenter survey of 97 patients of whom 52% had t(8;21)(q22;q22) and 48% had inv(16)(p13q22)/t(16;16)(p13;q22). The median age of the patients was 53 years (range, 19-81). Complete remission after anthracycline-based induction (n=86) and non-intensive therapy (n=11) was achieved in 97% and 36% of the patients, respectively. The median follow-up was 4.43 years (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 3.35-7.39 years). The median survival after intensive and non-intensive treatment was not reached and 0.96 years, respectively. Among intensively treated patients, inv(16) with trisomy 22 (n=11) was associated with a favorable 4-year relapse-free survival rate of 80% (95% CI: 59-100%) as compared to 38% (95% CI: 27-54%; P=0.02) in all other patients with CBFAML/ FLT3-ITD (n=75). Overall, 24 patients underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), 12 in first complete remission and 12 after relapse. Allogeneic HCT in first complete remission was not beneficial (P=0.60); however, allogeneic HCT seemed to improve median survival in relapsed patients compared to that of patients treated with chemotherapy (not reached vs. 0.6 years, respectively; P=0.002). Excluding patients with inv(16) with trisomy 22, our data indicate that compathe outcome of CBF-AML patients with FLT3-ITD may be inferior to that of patients without FLT3-ITD (based on previously published data), suggesting that prognostically CBF-AML patients with FLT3-ITD should not be classified as favorable-risk. FLT3-inhibitors may improve the outcome of these patients.

Prevalence and Clinical Outcome of FMS-Like Tyrosine Kinase Mutations Among Patients With Core Binding Factor-Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) belongs to favorable risk group in AML. However, approximately 50% of patients with CBF-AML remain incurable and their outcomes are also determined by the various co-occurring mutations. Though, FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3(FLT3) mutation in AML is associated with poor survival, the prevalence and prognostic significance of FLT3 mutations among CBF-AML is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the prevalence of FLT3 mutations (ITD and TKD) among patients with CBF-AML. The pooled prevalence of FLT3 mutations was estimated for patients with CBF-AML, t(8;21) and Inv(16). Pooled odds ratio was calculated to compare the prevalence of various FLT3 mutations within the 2 subsets of CBF-AML. A random effects model was adopted for analysis when heterogenicity existed (Pheterogenicity< 0.05 or I2 > 50%). Otherwise, a fixed effects model was used. RESULTS: The pooled prevalence of any FLT3 mutations among patients with CBF-AML was available from 18 studies and was 13% (95% CI: 10%-16%; I2 = 79%). Comparison of prevalence of FLT3 mutations between the 2 subgroups of CBF-AML showed that patients with t(8;21) had a higher prevalence of FLT3-ITD [pooled odds ratio(OR): 2.23 (95% CI:1.41-3.53, P < .01)] and lower prevalence of FLT3-TKD [pooled OR: 0.29 (95% CI:0.19-0.44; P < .01)] compared to patients with Inv(16). Additionally, we have discussed the prognostic significance of FLT3 mutations in CBF-AML patients. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of FLT3-TKD mutation was commoner among Inv(16) AML while FLT3-ITD mutation was commoner among t(8;21) AML. Uniform reporting of outcomes is essential to understand the prognostic significance of FLT3 mutations among CBF-AML.

Prognostic of Core Binding Factor (CBF) Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Complex Karyotype.

BACKGROUND: Core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF AML) with recurrent genetic abnormalities inv(16)(p13.1q22) or t(16;16)(p13.1;q22)/ CBFB-MYH11 are usually prognostically favorable but heterogeneous group and additional abnormalities change their prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To evaluate the impact of a complex karyotype on CBF AML prognosis, we included 24 patients with a median age of 56.4 years (23.2-83.3) and a median number of abnormalities of 5 (4-13). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 110.4 months. Among patients with a primary clone, complete remission (CR) was reached in 66.7% of patients. 31.3% of patients experienced AML relapse with a median of 8.5 months. Median OS for transplanted patients was 80.7 versus 40.5 months for non-transplanted patients, excluding the 4 patients with early death. Among patients harboring AML with clonal evolution, CR was reached in 62.5% of patients. 50% of patients underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). In these, median RFS was 19.3 versus 0 months in non-transplanted patients. Median OS seemed also longer in transplanted patients with 23.5 versus 2.95 months in non-transplanted. CONCLUSION: Use of new treatment and tailored strategy based on measurable residual disease monitoring may now improve these results. However, these data allow us to reconsider the good prognosis historically associated with CBF patients despite of karyotype and the place of ASCT in the strategy.

Core binding factor acute myelogenous leukemia-2021 treatment algorithm.

Core binding factor acute myelogenous leukemia (CBF-AML), characterized by the presence of either t(8;21) (q22;q22) or inv(16) (p13q22)/t(16;16), is considered good-risk AML in the context of cytarabine based intensive chemotherapy. Still, outcome can be improved significantly through the effective implementation of available therapeutic measures and appropriate disease monitoring. The incorporation of gemtuzumab ozogamicin into frontline therapy should be standard. Cytarabine based induction/consolidation regimen may be combined with anthracycline (3 + 7 standard) or antimetabolite, fludarabine. Serial quantitative polymerase chain reaction (QPCR) monitoring of unique fusion transcripts allows monitoring for measurable residual disease clearance; this allows for better prognostication and well as treatment modifications.

Co-occurrence of KIT and NRAS mutations defines an adverse prognostic core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.

Molecular abnormalities are frequent in core-binding factor (CBF) AMLs, but their prognostic relevance is controversial. Sixty-two patients were retrospectively analyzed and 47 harbored at least one gene mutation with a next-generation-sequencing assay. The most common molecular mutation was KIT mutation (30.6%), followed by NRAS (24.2%) and ASXL1 (14.5%) mutations, which was associated with a higher number of bone marrow blasts (p = .049) and older age (p = .027). The survival analysis showed KIT mutation adversely affected the overall survival (OS) (p = .046). NRAS mutation was associated with inferior OS (p = .016) and RFS (p = .039). Eight patients carried co-mutations of KIT and NRAS and had worse OS (p = .012) and RFS (p = .034). The multivariate analysis showed age ≥60 years and additional chromosomal abnormalities were significant adverse factors for OS. Thus, co-mutations of KIT and NRAS were significantly associated with a poor prognosis and should be taken into account when assessing for prognostic stratification in patients with CBF-AML.

Secondary cytogenetic abnormalities in core-binding factor AML harboring inv(16) vs t(8;21).

Patients with core-binding factor (CBF) acute myeloid leukemia (AML), caused by either t(8;21)(q22;q22) or inv(16)(p13q22)/t(16;16)(p13;q22), have higher complete remission rates and longer survival than patients with other subtypes of AML. However, ∼40% of patients relapse, and the literature suggests that patients with inv(16) fare differently from those with t(8;21). We retrospectively analyzed 537 patients with CBF-AML, focusing on additional cytogenetic aberrations to examine their impact on clinical outcomes. Trisomies of chromosomes 8, 21, or 22 were significantly more common in patients with inv(16)/t(16;16): 16% vs 7%, 6% vs 0%, and 17% vs 0%, respectively. In contrast, del(9q) and loss of a sex chromosome were more frequent in patients with t(8;21): 15% vs 0.4% for del(9q), 37% vs 0% for loss of X in females, and 44% vs 5% for loss of Y in males. Hyperdiploidy was more frequent in patients with inv(16) (25% vs 9%, whereas hypodiploidy was more frequent in patients with t(8;21) (37% vs 3%. In multivariable analyses (adjusted for age, white blood counts at diagnosis, and KIT mutation status), trisomy 8 was associated with improved overall survival (OS) in inv(16), whereas the presence of other chromosomal abnormalities (not trisomy 8) was associated with decreased OS. In patients with t(8;21), hypodiploidy was associated with improved disease-free survival; hyperdiploidy and del(9q) were associated with improved OS. KIT mutation (either positive or not tested, compared with negative) conferred poor prognoses in univariate analysis only in patients with t(8;21).

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Improved Survival for Adult Core Binding Factor Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Patients with Intermediate- and Adverse-Risk Genetics in the 2017 European LeukemiaNet.

The use of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for consolidation therapy in patients with core binding factor (CBF) acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) with intermediate- and adverse-risk genetics remains controversial. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of 286 CBF-AML patients with intermediate- and adverse-risk genetics in first complete remission following consolidation with chemotherapy (n = 122), auto-HSCT (n = 27), or allo-HSCT (n = 137) between January 2009 and December 2018 at our center. Patients with allo-HSCT showed superior 5-year overall survival (OS; 74% versus 38% or 49%; P < .001) and progression-free survival (PFS; 74% versus 26% or 49%; P < .001) and lower cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR; 9% versus 69% or 31%; P < .001) compared with chemotherapy alone or auto-HSCT. In the allo-HSCT group, minimal residual disease (MRD) at the second and third months after allo-HSCT could predict relapse in t(8;21) patients (2 months: PCIR = .002; 3 months: PCIR < .001) but not in inv(16) patients. Moreover, positive MRD after 2 courses of consolidation chemotherapy before allo-HSCT was an independent risk factor for survival in CBF-AML patients with intermediate- and adverse-risk genetics, whereas haploidentical donor (haplo-) HSCT could overcome the adverse prognosis (5-year OS, 87%; 5-year PFS, 81%; 5-year CIR, 7%). Allo-HSCT could be the optimal first-line consolidation therapy for patients with intermediate- and adverse-risk genetics, and haplo-HSCT could improve survival for patients with positive MRD after 2 courses of consolidation chemotherapy.