Comparison of Manual Restraint With and Without Sedation on Outcomes for Wild Birds Undergoing Decontamination.

The decontamination process for plumage-contaminated wild birds, such as those affected by oil spills, is lengthy and involves manual restraint and manipulation of all body parts. Birds commonly react to this in ways that suggest they are extremely stressed (eg, struggling, vocalizing). We proposed to reduce stress during the wash process using sedation and hypothesized that the use of sedation would not negatively impact survival. Contaminated birds in need of washing were randomly selected to be either sedated (butorphanol 2 mg/kg IM + midazolam 1 mg/kg IM and flumazenil 0.1 mg/kg IM for reversal) or not sedated at 3 US rehabilitation centers over the course of 1 year. Response to sedation was rated on a scale of 0-4 with 0 as no effect to 4 as excessively sedate. Data such as cloacal temperatures at various time points, lengths of various portions of the wash process, preening behavior in the drying pen, and disposition were collected. No statistical differences were found between sedated and nonsedated birds for any of the data points collected, including survival. There was a significant association between birds with higher cloacal temperatures in the drying pen and with birds held longer in the drying pen with improved survival; however, these findings were unrelated to whether the birds were sedated. Our findings show that sedation with butorphanol 2 mg/ kg IM and midazolam 1 mg/kg IM reversed with flumazenil 0.1 mg/kg IM can be used during the wash process for wild birds without adverse effects. Careful attention must be given to heat support for all birds while drying to prevent hypothermia.

Comparison of Remimazolam Tosilate and Propofol Sedation on the Early Postoperative Quality of Recovery in Patients Undergoing Day Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Purpose: Remimazolam tosilate is a novel ultrafast-acting benzodiazepine that has a rapid emergence even after continuous infusion when using flumazenil. So far, relatively few articles are still focusing on the quality of recovery after general anesthesia with remimazolam, especially in day surgery. This study aimed to compare the early postoperative quality of recovery of remimazolam tosilate with flumazenil and propofol in patients undergoing day surgery. Patients and Methods: 137 patients scheduled for day surgery were randomly divided into the remimazolam tosilate or propofol group. The primary endpoint was the incidence of overall recovery assessed with the early postoperative quality of recovery scale (PostopQRS) on postoperative day 1 (POD 1). The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) scores in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), extubation time, postoperative recovery profiles, and perioperative data were documented. Any adverse events were recorded. Results: The incidence of overall recovery on POD1 was 47.7% in the remimazolam tosilate group and 65.1% in the propofol group (odds ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26 to 1.06; P = 0.072). In general, the overall recovery of the PostopQRS increased over time, and its interaction between time and group was significant (P = 0.003). Among the five dimensions of PostopQRS, there exist statistical differences between groups including emotional state and cognitive recovery. Upon arrival at the PACU, the remimazolam group was more sedated and took longer to recover to a RASS score similar to propofol. The frequency of application of vasoactive drugs during anesthesia was similar in both groups (P = 0.119). Despite rapid emergence with remimazolam after flumazenil reversal, re-sedation (10.8%) or somnolence (60%) in the PACU was observed, and the length of PACU stay in patients treated with remimazolam tosilate was longer than that of the propofol (35 min vs 30 min, P<0.001). Conclusion: General anesthesia with remimazolam tosilate in conjunction with flumazenil reversal permits rapid recovery of consciousness in day surgery, but there was a notable occurrence of re-sedation or somnolence observed in PACU.

The role of hippocampal GABAA receptors on anxiolytic effects of Echium amoenum extract in a mice model of restraint stress.

Echium amoenum (EA), a popular medicinal plant in Persian medicine, has anxiolytic, antioxidant, sedative, and anti-inflammatory effects. This study examined whether GABA-ergic signaling is involved in the anxiolytic effects of EA in mice. Sixty BALB/c mice (25-30 g) were divided into six groups (n = 10) as follows: the (I) control group received 10 ml/kg normal saline (NS). In the stress groups, the animals underwent 14 consecutive days of restraint stress (RS), and received following treatments simultaneously; (II) RS + NS; (III) RS + Diaz (Diazepam); (IV) RS + EA; (V) RS + Flu (Flumazenil) + EA; (VI) RS + Flu + Diaz. Behavioral tests including the open field test (OFT) and elevated plus maze (EPM) were performed to evaluate anxiety-like behaviors and the effects of the regimens. The plasma level of corticosterone and the hippocampal protein expressions of IL-1ß, TNF-α, CREB, and BDNF, as well as p-GABAA/GABAA ratio, were also assessed. The findings revealed that chronic administration of EA alone produced anxiolytic effects in both behavioral tests, while diazepam alone or in combination with Flu failed to decrease the anxiety-like behaviors. Furthermore, the p-GABAA/GABAA and p-CREB/CREB ratios, and protein levels of BDNF were significantly increased in the EA-received group. On the other hand, plasma corticosterone levels and the hippocampal IL-1ß and TNF-α levels were significantly decreased by EA. However, pre-treatment with GABAA receptors (GABAA Rs) antagonist, Flu, reversed the anxiolytic and molecular effects of EA in the RS-subjected animals. Our findings confirmed that alternation of GABAAR is involved in the effects of EA against RS-induced anxiety-like behaviors, HPA axis activation, and neuroinflammation.

Efecto antagonista del flumazenil sobre el isoflurano en la emersión de la anestesia general / Antagonist effect of flumazenil on isofluran in reversion of general anesthesia

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Isoflurane, an inhalational general anesthetic widely used in medical practice, belonging to the group of volatile liquids together with desflurane and sevoflurane, with various properties including sedation, hypnosis and anesthesia of patients undergoing treatment. surgical acts. Volatile inhalational anesthetics (halogenated) as mechanism of action, has the property of increasing inhibitory synaptic transmission at postsynaptic level by potentiating ion channels regulated by ligand activated by alpha-aminobutyric acid (GABA). Flumazenil is a benzodiazepine antagonist belonging to the group of imidazobenzodiazepine. It is currently known that there is no specific drug capable of antagonizing the effects of halogenates that allow the rapid and complete recovery of general anesthesia, for this reason this work focuses its efforts on demonstrating whether flumazenil has the ability to reverse the actions of the patient. isoflurane and allow an early restoration of the level of consciousness. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study to be performed is a clinical type of longitudinal, prospective, unicentric and double blind. The sample will be formed by patients who are going to be subjected to a balanced general anesthesia. The sample will be divided into 2 large groups: group C (control) and group F (Flumazenil). At the end of the surgery, the mixture will be administered according to the selected group in a random manner (Flumazenil 0.25 mg or 0.9% solution in a 20 cc syringe) and the time of extubation, recovery time of the level of consciousness, time of discharge UCPA and hemodynamic state (FC, TAM and SO2). RESULTS: The flumazenil group showed a significantly shorter time from injection to extubation than the placebo group (p = 0.007). Differences in terms of shorter times needed to achieve Aldrete of 9 points in the flumazenil group (P = 0.04) were observed as were shorter anesthetic arousal times represented by a Ramsey 2. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure and saturation they had similar values between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: The study showed that a single dose of 0.25 mg of flumazenil administered at the end of the surgical act, just after completing all surgical stimulation was beneficial (P = 0.007) in the context of extubation times and shorter anesthetic arousal times.

INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: El isoflurano un anestésico general inhalatorio usado ampliamente en la práctica médica, perteneciente al grupo de los líquidos volátiles junto con el desflurano y sevoflurano, con variadas propiedades entre las que se encuentran la sedación, hipnosis y anestesia de los pacientes sometidos a actos quirúrgicos. Los anestésicos inhalatorios volátiles (halogenados) como mecanismo de acción, tiene la propiedad de aumentar la transmisión sináptica inhibidora a nivel postsináptico potenciando los canales iónicos regulados por ligando activados por ácido alfa-aminobutírico (GABA). El flumazenil es un antagonista benzodiazepínico perteneciente al grupo de los imidazobenzodiazepina. Se conoce actualmente que no existe un fármaco específico capaz de antagonizar los efectos de los halogenados que permitan la recuperación rápida y completa de la anestesia general, por tal motivo este trabajo centra sus esfuerzos en demostrar si el flumazenil tiene la capacidad para revertir las acciones del isoflurane y permitir un restablecimiento temprano del nivel de conciencia. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: El estudio a realizar es de tipo clínico de corte longitudinal, prospectivo, unicéntrico y doble ciego. La muestra se conformará por pacientes que vayan a ser sometidos a anestesia general balanceada. Se procederá a dividir la muestra en 2 grandes grupos: grupo C (control) y grupo F (flumazenil). Al final de la cirugía se administrará la mezcla según grupo seleccionado de manera al azar (flumazenil 0,25 mg o solución 0,9% en una jeringa de 20 cc) y se valorará el tiempo de extubación, tiempo de recuperación del nivel de conciencia, tiempo de alta de la UCPA y estado hemodinámico (FC, TAM y SO2). RESULTADOS: El grupo de flumazenil presentó un tiempo desde la inyección hasta la extubación significativamente más bajo que el grupo placebo (p = 0,007). Se observaron diferencias en términos de tiempos más bajos necesario para alcanzar Aldrete de 9 puntos en el grupo flumazenil (P = 0,04) al igual que tiempos de despertar anestésico más cortos representados por un Ramsey 2. La frecuencia cardíaca, presión arterial media y la saturación tuvieron valores similares entre los 2 grupos. CONCLUSIÓN: El estudio demostró que una única dosis de 0,25 mg de flumazenil administrado al final del acto quirúrgico, justo después de culminar toda estimulación quirúrgica fue beneficiosa (P = 0,007) en el contexto de tiempos de extubación y tiempos de despertar anestésico más cortos.

The use of flumazenil for benzodiazepine associated respiratory depression in postanesthesia recovery: risks and outcomes / O uso de flumazenil para depressão respiratória associada ao benzodiazepínico na recuperação pós-anestésica: riscos e resultados

Abstract Background and objectives The primary aim was to determine risk factors for flumazenil administration during postanesthesia recovery. A secondary aim was to describe outcomes among patients who received flumazenil. Methods Patients admitted to the postanesthesia recovery room at a large, academic, tertiary care facility after surgery under general anesthesia from January 1, 2010, to April 30, 2015, were identified and matched to 2 controls each, by age, sex, and surgical procedure. Flumazenil was administered in the recovery phase immediately after general anesthesia, according to the clinical judgment of the anesthesiologist. Demographic, procedural, and outcome data were extracted from the electronic health record. Conditional logistic regression, accounting for the 1:2 matched-set case-control study designs, was used to assess characteristics associated with flumazenil use. Results The incidence of flumazenil administration in the postanesthesia care unit was 9.9 per 10,000 (95% CI, 8.4-11.6) general anesthetics. History of obstructive sleep apnea (Odds Ratio [OR] = 2.27; 95% CI 1.02-5.09), longer anesthesia (OR = 1.13; 95% CI 1.03-1.24 per 30 minutes), use of total intravenous anesthesia (OR = 6.09; 95% CI 2.60-14.25), and use of benzodiazepines (OR = 8.17; 95% CI 3.71-17.99) were associated with risk for flumazenil administration. Among patients who received midazolam, cases treated with flumazenil received a higher median (interquartile range) dose than controls: 3.5 mg (2.0-4.0 mg) vs. 2.0 mg (2.0-2.0 mg), respectively (p < 0.001). Flumazenil use was correlated with a higher rate of unanticipated noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, longer postanesthesia care unit stay, and increased rate of intensive care unit admissions. Conclusions Patients who required flumazenil postoperatively had received a higher dosage of benzodiazepines and utilized more postoperative health care resources. More conservative perioperative use of benzodiazepines may improve postoperative recovery and use of health care resources.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivos Determinar os fatores de risco da administração de flumazenil durante a recuperação pós-anestésica e descrever os desfechos entre os pacientes que receberam flumazenil. Métodos Os pacientes admitidos em sala de recuperação pós-anestésica de um grande centro universitário em setor terciário de cuidados pós-cirurgia sob anestesia geral entre 1° de janeiro de 2010 e 30 de abril de 2015 foram identificados e pareados com dois controles cada por idade, sexo e procedimento cirúrgico. Flumazenil foi administrado na fase de recuperação imediatamente após a anestesia geral, de acordo com a avaliação clínica do anestesiologista. Os dados demográficos, dos procedimentos e dos desfechos foram extraídos do registro eletrônico de saúde. A regressão logística condicional para os desenhos do estudo de caso-controle pareado em 1:2 foi usada para avaliar as características associadas ao uso de flumazenil. Resultados A incidência da administração de flumazenil em sala de recuperação pós-anestésica foi de 9,9 por 10.000 (95% IC: 8,4-1,6) anestesias gerais. História da apneia obstrutiva do sono (razão de chances [OR] = 2,27; IC 95%: 1,02-5,09), anestesia de longa duração (OR = 1,13; IC 95%: 1,03-1,24 por 30 minutos), uso de anestesia intravenosa total (OR = 6,09; IC de 95%: 2,60-14,25) e uso de benzodiazepínicos (OR = 8,17; IC 95%: 3,71-17,99) foram associados a risco para a administração de flumazenil. Entre os pacientes que receberam midazolam, os casos tratados com flumazenil receberam uma dose mediana mais alta (intervalo interquartil) do que os controles: 3,5 mg (2,0-4,0 mg) vs. 2,0 mg (2,0-2,0 mg), respectivamente (p < 0,001). O uso de flumazenil foi correlacionado com uma taxa maior não prevista de ventilação não invasiva com pressão positiva, permanência mais longa em sala de recuperação pós-anestésica e aumento da taxa de admissões em unidade de terapia intensiva. Conclusão Os pacientes que precisaram de flumazenil no pós-operatório receberam uma dose maior de benzodiazepínicos e usaram mais recursos de cuidados da saúde no pós-operatório. O uso mais conservador de benzodiazepínicos no período perioperatório pode melhorar a recuperação e o uso de recursos de cuidados da saúde no pós-operatório.

Flumazenil reduces respiratory complications during anesthesia emergence in children with preoperative upper respiratory tract infections.

Despite its benignity, upper respiratory infections (URIs) 1 increase the risk of postoperative respiratory complications during the perioperative and postoperative periods. Flumazenil could improve the symptoms of respiratory obstruction.To evaluate the effect of flumazenil on the occurrence of respiratory complications during anesthesia emergence of children with preoperative URI.This was a prospective study of 164 consecutive pediatric patients who underwent strabismus surgery under general anesthesia at the Tianjin Eye Hospital between August 2016 and April 2017. The patients were grouped as: normal airway (N), recent mild URI (I), normal airway and flumazenil (NF), and recent mild URI and flumazenil (group IF) (n = 41/group). An initial dose of flumazenil (0.1 mg) was administrated intravenously to groups IF and NF. The intraoperative and postoperative respiratory complications were recorded by one anesthesiologist unaware of the grouping.All patients underwent surgery uneventfully. The incidence of postoperative respiratory complications in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) was higher in group I compared with the other 3 groups (IF: 17%; I: 41%; NF: 5%; N: 10%; P = .0147). During the PACU period, significant differences among groups were seen for cough (IF: 15%; I: 20%; NF: 2%; N: 0%; P = .004), secretion (IF: 17%; I: 29%; NF: 5%; N: 7%; P = .007), low oxygen saturation (IF: 12%; I: 32%; NF: 2%; N: 7%; P = .001), and glossocoma (IF: 15%; I: 34%; NF: 10%; N: 32%; P = .015).Respiratory complications during anesthesia emergence were higher in patients with recent preoperative URI compared to patients with healthy airways. Postoperative flumazenil could reduce the incidence of glossocoma.

Efficacy and safety of flumazenil injection for the reversal of midazolam sedation after elective outpatient endoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: Midazolam sedation during elective endoscopy is widely performed and flumazenil is frequently administered after endoscopy to reverse sedation in clinical practice. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of flumazenil injections after elective endoscopy under midazolam sedation. METHODS: Participants who underwent an upper endoscopy under midazolam sedation were randomly divided into two groups. In group I, flumazenil was administered i.v. 10 min after the patient's transfer to the recovery room, and no antidote was injected in group II. The time of stay in the recovery room and adverse events were reviewed through the nursing records. We asked the patients about their pain and degree of satisfaction according to a visual analogue scale (VAS), their memory of the procedure, mental status and the presence of uncomfortable symptoms on the day of the procedure and the day afterwards. RESULTS: The length of stay in recovery was significantly shorter in group I than in group II. No significant differences were found in the number of patients with pain (VAS ≥1), adverse events and discomfort between the two groups. Additionally, there were no differences in the patients' memory of the procedure, satisfaction with sedation, willingness to repeat the endoscopy and mental status. CONCLUSIONS: The time in the recovery room after flumazenil administration was significantly shortened, and the use of the drug did not increase the risk of adverse events or discomfort. The use of flumazenil for reversing midazolam sedation seems to be safe and effective.

Inhalation of 50% Oxygen Does Not Impair Respiratory Depression During Midazolam Sedation.

PURPOSE: To investigate how inhalation of 50% oxygen during intravenous midazolam sedation affects respiratory variables and thus the availability of oxygen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study subjects were 21 healthy adult volunteers (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I). They were allocated to undergo midazolam sedation during high-concentration oxygen inhalation (group H) or during normal air inhalation (group N) in a single-blinded randomized crossover design, with an interval of at least 3 days between the 2 sedation sessions. In each experiment, midazolam 0.05 mg/kg was administered, after which the following variables were measured for 40 minutes: oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2), end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure (ETCO2), respiration rate (RR), tidal volume (VT), and minute volume (MV). Subsequently, flumazenil 0.5 mg was administered, and the same variables were measured for 10 minutes. RESULTS: SpO2 decreased after midazolam administration in the 2 groups. SpO2 in group H was higher than that in group N at all time points. RR increased and VT decreased after midazolam administration in the 2 groups; however, in contrast to SpO2, the levels of these parameters did not meaningfully differ between groups at any time point. MV remained unchanged in the 2 groups. ETCO2 decreased similarly after midazolam administration in the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Inhalation of 50% oxygen during midazolam sedation did not enhance respiratory depression by midazolam. This suggests that high-concentration oxygen inhalation during midazolam sedation could prevent hypoxia.

Risk Factors and Outcomes of Reversal Agent Use in Moderate Sedation During Endoscopy and Colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Moderate sedation has been standard for noninvasive gastrointestinal procedures for decades yet there are limited data on reversal agent use and outcomes associated with need for reversal of sedation. AIM: To determine prevalence and clinical significance of reversal agent use during endoscopies and colonoscopies. METHODS: Individuals with adverse events requiring naloxone and/or flumazenil during endoscopy or colonoscopy from 2008 to 2013 were identified. A control group was obtained by random selection of patients matched by procedure type and date. Prevalence of reversal agent use and statistical comparison of patient demographics and risk factors against controls were determined. RESULTS: Prevalence of reversal agent use was 0.03% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.02-0.04]. Events triggering reversal use were oxygen desaturation (64.4%), respiration changes (24.4%), hypotension (8.9%), and bradycardia (6.7%). Two patients required escalation of care and the majority of patients were stabilized and discharged home. Compared with the control group, the reversal group was older (61±1.8 vs. 55±1.6, P=0.01), mostly female (82% vs. 50%, P<0.01), and had lower body mass index (24±0.8 vs. 27±0.7, P=0.03) but received similar dosages of sedation. When adjusted for age, race, sex, and body mass index, the odds of reversal agent patients having a higher ASA score than controls was 4.7 (95% CI, 1.7-13.1), and the odds of having a higher Mallampati score than controls was 5.0 (95% CI, 2.1-11.7) with P<0.01. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of reversal agent use during moderate sedation is low and outcomes are generally good. Several clinically relevant risk factors for reversal agent use were found suggesting that certain groups may benefit from closer monitoring.

Conscious Sedation Using Midazolam and Sequential Flumazenil in Cirrhotic Patients for Prophylactic Endoscopic Variceal Ligation.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study investigated the safety of endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) under conscious sedation with midazolam and sequential flumazenil after procedure in these patients. METHODS: A total of 279 patients who underwent secondary prophylactic EVL at our institution between April 2012 and June 2014, were enrolled. Conscious sedation was achieved using intravenous midazolam, and flumazenil was routinely used as an antidote immediately after EVL. Patients with sleep (n = 165) and non-sleep (n = 55) endoscopy were matched using propensity score analysis (3:1). Frequencies of overt hepatic encephalopathy (HEP) and patient' satisfactions with EVL were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Of the 279 patients, 155 (55.6%) were of Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) class, B or C, and 224 (80.3%) patients underwent sleep endoscopy. After propensity score analysis, overt HEP was observed in 1 (0.4%) of the 165 patients in the sedated group, but not found in any in the non-sedated group. Patient' satisfaction with EVL was better in the sedated group (p < 0.001). Twenty-nine (65.9%) of the 44 patients with CTP class C underwent sleep endoscopy, and only one (3.4%) experienced overt HEP. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic EVL under conscious sedation using midazolam and flumazenil is probably safe in cirrhotic patients without experience of HEP, even in those of CTP class C.

Effects in cats of atipamezole, flumazenil and 4-aminopyridine on stress-related neurohormonal and metabolic responses induced by medetomidine, midazolam and ketamine.

This study aimed to investigate the antagonistic effects of a fixed dose of atipamezole (ATI), flumazenil (FLU) and 4-aminopyridine (4AP), both alone and in various combinations, on key stress-related neurohormonal and metabolic changes induced by medetomidine (MED), midazolam (MID) and ketamine (KET) in healthy cats. Seven cats were used consistently in eight investigation groups. Cats were administered a mixture of 0.05 mg/kg MED and 0.5 mg/kg MID followed 10 mins later by 10 mg/kg KET intramuscularly. Twenty minutes after KET injection, the cats were intravenously injected with either a physiological saline solution at 0.1 ml/kg (control) or one of the seven variations of experimental drugs, alone or in combination: ATI, FLU, 4AP, ATI + FLU, FLU + 4AP, ATI + 4AP and ATI + FLU + 4AP. Blood samples were collected 10 times during the 24 h test period. Plasma glucose, insulin, cortisol, epinephrine, norepinephrine and non-esterified fatty acid levels were measured. The administration of MED + MID + KET resulted in hyperglycaemia and decreases in epinephrine, norepinephrine, cortisol and non-esterified fatty acid levels. FLU or 4AP alone or FLU + 4AP did not effectively antagonise the effects induced by MED + MID + KET but enhanced the hyperglycaemia. ATI alone was effective in antagonising these effects. Compared with non-ATI regimens, combinations with ATI were more effective in antagonising the effects induced by MED + MID + KET; however, ATI + FLU + 4AP caused large increases in cortisol, epinephrine and norepinephrine concentrations. ATI, both alone and in combination, is effective in antagonising the neurohormonal and metabolic effects of MED + MID + KET in cats. However, ATI + FLU + 4AP is not suitable because of large stress-related hormonal responses.

Significant and safe shortening of the recovery time after flumazenil-reversed midazolam sedation.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopy under midazolam sedation requires a 2-h recovery facility. AIM: To study the potential of shortening patients' stay without jeopardizing patients' safety by the use of the benzodiazepine-antagonist flumazenil in the everyday practice and to investigate the feasibility of a study comparing midazolam with recovery with midazolam-flumazenil and immediate discharge. METHODS: Consecutive ambulatory patients referred for endoscopy under midazolam sedation with ASA I or II, escorted by a person, were eligible. Flumazenil was given on arrival in the recovery room. Patients were discharged when adequate Aldrete scores and physical mobility were present. The next day, they were contacted by telephone. RESULTS: A total of 1,506 patients participated. They received 5 mg midazolam, while 887 patients also received 50 mcg fentanyl. The median dose of flumazenil was 0.2 mg. Oxygen desaturation (sO2 <92%) occurred in 15% during the procedure without an effect on recovery and discharge times. Patients left the department 65 min after the last midazolam administration. The majority (82.7%) were fully alert during their journey home. At home, 2.7% went to bed, 45.2% took a nap, and 40% undertook activities. Almost every patient (98.8%) liked the shortened recovery time. Three patients had an incident (fainting, fall, and near-fall) without consequences. Based on this low incidence, a non-inferiority comparison of midazolam-flumazenil with midazolam-recovery would require a total of 32,650 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of flumazenil resulted in a safe shortening of the recovery period and offers the possibility for substantial savings in time, space, and nurse resources. A non-inferiority comparison will not be practicable.

Delayed flumazenil injection after endoscopic sedation increases patient satisfaction compared with immediate flumazenil injection.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Flumazenil was administered after the completion of endoscopy under sedation to reduce recovery time and increase patient safety. We evaluated patient satisfaction after endoscopy under sedation according to the timing of a postprocedural flumazenil injection. METHODS: In total, 200 subjects undergoing concurrent colonoscopy and upper endoscopy while sedated with midazolam and meperidine were enrolled in our investigation. We randomly administered 0.3 mg of flumazenil either immediately or 15 minutes after the endoscopic procedure. A postprocedural questionnaire and next day telephone interview were conducted to assess patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Flumazenil injection timing did not affect the time spent in the recovery room when comparing the two groups of patients. However, the subjects in the 15 minutes injection group were more satisfied with undergoing endoscopy under sedation than the patients in the immediate injection group according to the postprocedural survey (p=0.019). However, no difference in overall satisfaction, memory, or willingness to undergo a future endoscopy was observed between the two groups when the telephone survey was conducted on the following day. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that a delayed flumazenil injection after endoscopic sedation increased patient satisfaction without prolonging recovery time, even though the benefit of the delayed flumazenil injection did not persist into the following day.

Sedation and physiologic response to manual restraint after intranasal administration of midazolam in Hispaniolan Amazon parrots (Amazona ventralis).

Administration of intranasal midazolam (2 mg/kg) was evaluated for sedation and effects on cloacal temperature, respiratory rate, and heart rate in manually restrained Hispaniolan Amazon parrots (Amazona ventralis). Adult parrots (n=9) were administered either midazolam (2 mg/kg) or an equal volume of saline solution intranasally before a 15-minute manual restraint in a complete crossover study. Respiratory rate and sedation scores were recorded before and during capture and during and after 15 minutes of manual restraint. Heart rate and cloacal temperature were recorded during manual restraint. After restraint, the parrots received intranasal flumazenil (0.05 mg/kg) or an equal volume of saline solution, and the recovery time was recorded. In those birds that received midazolam, sedation was observed within 3 minutes of administration, and vocalization, flight, and defense responses were significantly reduced during capture. During manual restraint, the mean rate of cloacal temperature increase was significantly slower and remained significantly lower in birds that received midazolam compared with controls. Mean respiratory rates were significantly lower for up to 12 minutes in parrots that received midazolam compared with those receiving saline solution. Flumazenil antagonized the effects of midazolam within 10 minutes. No overt clinical adverse effects to intranasal midazolam and flumazenil administration were observed. Further studies on the safety of intranasal midazolam and flumazenil in this species are warranted.

Rapid and reliable sedation induced by diazepam and antagonized by flumazenil in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).

Songbirds have emerged as attractive model systems in many areas of biological research. Notably, songbirds are used in studies of the neurobiological and neuroendocrine mechanisms that shape vocal communication, and zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) are the most commonly studied species. In these studies, some form of chemical restraint is often needed to facilitate procedures and to minimize the risk of injury during handling. To determine the minimum dose of the benzodiazepine diazepam that is adequate to achieve deep sedation across individual birds, a low dose (5 mg/kg) and a high dose (10 mg/kg) was administered intramuscularly to 20 zebra finches. Results showed that a 10 mg/kg dose of diazepam resulted in deep sedation, defined by dorsal recumbency, which was achieved in minutes and lasted for several hours. Sedation was induced without complication, because no birds displayed signs of distress during sedation or lethargy after recovery, and was adequate to permit minimally invasive surgical procedures. In addition, the duration of sedation was dose dependent, which provides additional information for researchers who seek to match the depth of sedation to their experimental requirements. Finally, complete recovery from the deeply sedated state was induced by a 0.3 mg/kg dose of the antagonist flumazenil, which enabled birds to more rapidly resume homeostatic behaviors to promote well-being and survival. Together, these results indicate that diazepam is a safe and reliable sedative for use in zebra finches and support specific recommendations to achieve rapid and reliable sedation and recovery.

Midazolam increases bite force during intravenous sedation.

PURPOSE: Although there have been many reports on the effects of midazolam on vital function and the recovery profile, little is known about muscle power during sedation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of midazolam on muscle power during moderate sedation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The subjects were 20 male volunteers classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I. Each subject underwent 2 experiments in a randomized crossover manner (midazolam and control groups). After baseline data were obtained, midazolam (0.05 mg/kg) was administered. Thirty minutes after midazolam administration, flumazenil (0.5 mg) was administered to antagonize the sedative effects of midazolam in the midazolam group. Heart rate, noninvasive blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, and the bispectral index value were monitored. The Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale and the correct-answer rate of the Stroop color word test were assessed. To evaluate muscle power, grip strength and bite force were measured. After baseline measurement, all variables were measured 2, 5, 10, 20, and 30 minutes after midazolam administration and 5, 10, and 20 minutes after flumazenil administration. For statistical comparisons, repeated measures analysis of variance, the Friedman χ(2) test, and the Student t test for paired samples were used. RESULTS: No significant changes were observed for any variable in the control group. In the midazolam group, the bispectral index value and the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale decreased during midazolam sedation. The correct-answer rate of the Stroop color word test decreased 5 and 10 minutes after midazolam administration. Grip strength decreased during midazolam sedation. Bite force increased immediately after midazolam administration and remained increased even after flumazenil administration. CONCLUSIONS: Although the detailed mechanisms are unknown, bite force increases despite the muscle-relaxant action of midazolam during sedation and persists even with flumazenil reversal.

Prospective comparative assessment of buprenorphine overdose with heroin and methadone: clinical characteristics and response to antidotal treatment.

Buprenorphine is a partial opioid agonist with a "ceiling effect" for respiratory depression. Despite this, it has been associated with severe overdoses. Conflicting data exist regarding its response in overdose to naloxone. We compared clinical overdose characteristics of buprenorphine with heroin and methadone and assessed responses to naloxone and flumazenil. Patients admitted to two intensive care units with severe opioid overdoses were enrolled into this 4-year prospective study. Urine and blood toxicological screening were performed to identify overdoses involving predominantly buprenorphine, heroin, or methadone. Eighty-four patients with heroin (n = 26), buprenorphine (n = 39), or methadone (n = 19) overdoses were analyzed. In the buprenorphine group, sedative drug coingestions were frequent (95%), whereas in the methadone group, suicide attempts were significantly more often reported (p = .0007). Buprenorphine overdose induced an opioid syndrome not differing significantly from heroin and methadone in mental status (as measured by Glasgow Coma Score) or arterial blood gases. Mental status depression was not reversed in buprenorphine overdoses with naloxone (0.4-0.8 mg) but did improve with flumazenil (0.2-1 mg) if benzodiazepines were coingested. In conclusion, buprenorphine overdose causes an opioid syndrome clinically indistinguishable from heroin and methadone. Although mental status and respiratory depression are often unresponsive to low-dose naloxone, flumazenil may be effective in buprenorphine overdoses involving benzodiazepines.

The stimulatory effects of caffeine with oseltamivir (Tamiflu) on light-dark behavior and open-field behavior in mice.

Abnormal behaviors and death associated with the use of oseltamivir (Tamiflu) have emerged as a major issue in influenza patients taking the drug. Here, we investigated the mechanisms underlying the effects of oseltamivir on the behavior of mice using light-dark and open-field preference tests. Oseltamivir (75 and 150 mg/kg, intraperitoneally (i.p.)) alone affected neither time spent in the open area in the light-dark preference test nor ambulation in the open-field test at 2h post-injection. However, a non-selective adenosine A(1)/A(2) receptor antagonist, caffeine (10mg/kg, i.p.) in combination with oseltamivir (150 mg/kg, i.p.) increased time spent in the open area in the light-dark preference test. This enhancement was not inhibited by a benzodiazepine receptor antagonist, flumazenil (10-20mg/kg, subcutaneously (s.c.)). Enhancement of ambulation in the open-field test was also observed when caffeine (10mg/kg, i.p.) was combined with oseltamivir (150 mg/kg, i.p.). This enhancement was inhibited by a dopamine D(2) receptor antagonist, haloperidol (0.1mg/kg, s.c.). Furthermore, an adenosine A(2) receptor antagonist, SCH58261 (3mg/kg, i.p.) in combination with oseltamivir (150 mg/kg, i.p.) increased ambulation in the open-field test, while an adenosine A(1) receptor antagonist, DPCPX (1-3mg/kg, i.p.) did not. These findings suggest that the actions of oseltamivir may involve the dopamine and adenosine systems. Our findings suggest that due to the interaction between central blockade of adenosine A(2) receptors by caffeine, and oseltamivir-induced behavioral changes, patients being treated with oseltamivir should be closely monitored.

Segurança da ecocardiografia transesofágica em adultos: Estudo em um hospital multidisciplinar / Safety of transesophageal echocardiography in adults: study in a multidisciplinary hospital / Seguridad de la ecocardiografía transesofágica en adultos: Estudio en un hospital multidisciplinario

FUNDAMENTO: A ecocardiografia transesofágica (ETE) é um exame semi-invasivo amplamente utilizado e seu uso associado a sedativos poderá influenciar a segurança do procedimento. OBJETIVO: analisar aspectos da segurança da ETE associada ao uso de midazolam (MZ) e flumazenil (FL) e a influência de variáveis clínicas na taxa de eventos. MÉTODO: estudo prospectivo com 137 pacientes que realizaram ETE com MZ associado à sedação moderada. Analisamos as seguintes ocorrências: complicações com anestesia tópica, ao uso do MZ e complicações relacionadas ao procedimento. Análises uni e multivariada foram usadas para testar a influência das variáveis clínicas: idade, sexo, acidente vascular cerebral (AVC), miocardiopatia (MP), duração do exame, insuficiência mitral (IM) e dose de MZ. RESULTADOS: todos pacientes (65±16 anos; 58 por cento masculino) completaram o exame. As doses médias de MZ e FL foram de 4,3±1,9 mg e 0,28±0,2 mg, respectivamente. A duração do exame e a fração de ejeção (FE) média foram de 16.4±6.1 minutos e 60±9 por cento, respectivamente. O evento mais comum foi a hipóxia leve (SO2<90 por cento), em 11 pacientes; 3 pacientes (2 por cento) apresentaram hipóxia transitória por obstrução da via aérea superior na passagem da sonda, enquanto 8 (5,8 por cento) apresentaram hipóxia devido ao uso do MZ. Hipotensão transitória (PAS<90 mmHg) ocorreu em 1 paciente (0,7 por cento). A análise multivariada mostrou que insuficiência mitral (IM) importante, MP (FE<45 por cento) e altas doses do MZ (>5mg) tiveram associação com tais eventos (p<0,001). A FE no grupo com MP foi de 40 por cento, ao passo que, no grupo com insuficiência mitral (IM), esse percentual foi de 44 por cento, podendo ser este um fator associado a eventos clínicos neste último grupo. CONCLUSÃO: ETE com sedação tem baixas taxas de eventos. Não se observou eventos graves e não houve a necessidade de interrupção dos exames.

BACKGROUND: TEE is a semi-invasive tool broadly used and its utilization associated to sedatives drugs might to affect the procedure safety. OBJECTIVE: to analyze aspects of TEE safety associated to the use of Midazolan (MZ) and Flumazenil (FL) and the influence of the clinical variables on the event rate. METHOD: prospective study with 137 patients that underwent TEE with MZ associated to moderate sedation. We analyzed the following events: complications related with the topical anesthesia, with MZ use and with the procedure. Uni- and multivariate analyses were used to test the influence of the clinical variables: age, sex, stroke, myocardiopathy (MP), duration of the test, mitral regurgitation (MR) and the MZ dose. RESULTS: All patients (65±16 yrs; 58 percent males) finished the examination. The mean doses of MZ and FL were 4.3±1.9 mg and 0.28±0.2 mg, respectively. The duration of the examination and the mean ejection fraction (EF) were 16.4±6.1 minutes and 60±9 percent, respectively. Mild hypoxia (SO2<90 percent) was the most common event (11 patients); 3 patients (2 percent) presented transient hypoxia due to upper airway obstruction by probe introduction and 8 (5.8 percent) due to hypoxia caused by MZ use. Transient hypotension (SAP<90mmHg) occurred in 1 patient (0.7 percent). The multivariate analysis showed that severe MR, MP (EF<45 percent) and high doses of MZ (>5mg) were associated with events (p<0.001). The EF was 40 percent, in the group with MP and 44 percent in the group with severe MR and it can be a factor associated with clinical events in the last group. CONCLUSION: TEE with sedation presents a low rate of events. There were no severe events and there was no need to interrupt the examinations.

FUNDAMENTO: La ecocardiografía transesofágica (ETE) es un examen semiinvasivo ampliamente utilizado y su uso asociado a sedantes puede influir sobre la seguridad del procedimiento. OBJETIVO: Analizar aspectos de la seguridad de la ETE asociada al uso de midazolam (MZ) y flumazenil (FL) y la influencia de variables clínicas en la tasa de complicaciones. MÉTODO: Estudio prospectivo con 137 pacientes, a quienes se realizó ETE con MZ asociado a la sedación moderada. Analizamos los siguientes eventos: complicaciones con anestesia local, relacionadas al uso de MZ y complicaciones relacionadas con el procedimiento. Se utilizaron análisis uni y multivariados para evaluar la influencia de las variables clínicas: edad, sexo, accidente cerebrovascular (ACV), miocardiopatía (MP), duración del estudio, insuficiencia mitral (IM) y dosis de MZ. RESULTADOS: Todos los pacientes (65±16 años; 58 por ciento masculino) completaron el estudio. Las dosis promedio de MZ y FL fueron de 4,3±1,9 mg y 0,28±0,2 mg, respectivamente. La duración del estudio y la fracción de eyección (FE) promedio fueron de 16.4±6.1 minutos y 60±9 por ciento, respectivamente. El evento más común fue la hipoxia leve (SO2<90 por ciento), en 11 pacientes; 3 pacientes (2 por ciento) presentaron hipoxia transitoria por obstrucción de la vía aérea superior con el pasaje de la sonda, mientras que 8 (5,8 por ciento) presentaron hipoxia debido a la utilización del MZ. Un paciente (0.7 por ciento) padeció hipotensión transitoria (PAS<90 mmHg). El análisis multivariado mostró que IM significativa, MP (FE<45 por ciento) y altas dosis de MZ (>5mg) se asociaron a tales complicaciones (p<0,001). La FE en el grupo con MP fue de 40 por ciento, mientras que, en el grupo con insuficiencia mitral, ese porcentaje fue de 44 por ciento, pudiendo ser éste un factor asociado a complicaciones clínicas en este último grupo. CONCLUSIÓN: ETE con sedación presenta bajas tasas de ...

Effect of flumazenil on disturbance of equilibrium function induced by midazolam.

Benzodiazepines in intravenous sedation are useful, owing to their outstanding amnesic effect when used for oral surgery as well as dental treatments on patients with intellectual disability or dental phobia. However, compared with propofol, the effect of benzodiazepine lasts longer and may impede discharge, especially when it is administered orally because of fear of injections. Although flumazenil antagonizes the effects of benzodiazepine quickly, its effect on the equilibrium function (EF) has never been tested. Since EF is more objective than other tests, the purpose of this study is to assess the sedation level and EF using a computerized static posturographic platform. The collection of control values was followed by the injection of 0.075 mg/kg of midazolam. Thirty minutes later, 0.5 mg or 1.0 mg of flumazenil was administered, and the sedation level and EF were measured until 150 minutes after flumazenil administration. Flumazenil antagonized sedation, and there was no apparent resedation; however, it failed to antagonize the disturbance in EF. This finding may be due to differences in the difficulty of assessing the sedation level and performing the EF test, and a greater amount of flumazenil may effectively antagonize the disturbance in EF.