Trans-ulnar fracture dislocations of the elbow: a systematic review and clarification of classification systems.

BACKGROUND: Complex elbow dislocations in which the dorsal cortex of the ulna is fractured can be difficult to classify and therefore treat. These have variably been described as either Monteggia variant injuries or trans-olecranon fracture dislocations. Additionally, O'Driscoll et al classified coronoid fractures that exit the dorsal cortex of the ulna as "basal coronoid, subtype 2" fractures. The Mayo classification of trans-ulnar fracture dislocations categorizes these injuries in 3 types according to what the coronoid remains attached to: trans-olecranon fracture dislocations, Monteggia variant fracture dislocations, and trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture dislocations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of these injury patterns as reported in the literature. Our hypothesis was that trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture dislocations would have a worse prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to identify studies with trans-ulnar fracture dislocations that had documentation of associated coronoid injuries. A literature search identified 16 qualifying studies with 296 fractures. Elbows presenting with basal subtype 2 or Regan/Morrey III coronoid fractures and Jupiter IIA and IID injuries were classified as trans-ulnar basal coronoid fractures. Patients with trans-olecranon or Monteggia fractures were classified as such if the coronoid was not fractured or an associated coronoid fracture had been classified as O'Driscoll tip, anteromedial facet, basal subtype I, or Regan Morrey I/II. RESULTS: The 296 fractures reviewed were classified as trans-olecranon in 44 elbows, Monteggia variant in 82 elbows, and trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture dislocations in 170 elbows. Higher rates of complications and reoperations were reported for trans-ulnar basal coronoid injuries (40%, 25%) compared to trans-olecranon (11%, 18%) and Monteggia variant injuries (25%, 13%). The mean flexion-extension arc for basal coronoid fractures was 106° compared to 117° for Monteggia (P < .01) and 121° for trans-olecranon injuries (P = .02). The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 84 points for trans-ulnar basal coronoid, 91 for Monteggia (P < .01), and 93 for trans-olecranon fracture dislocations (P < .05). Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores were 22 and 80 for trans-ulnar basal coronoid, respectively, compared to 23 and 89 for trans-olecranon fractures. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons was not available for any Monteggia injuries, but the mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand was 13. DISCUSSION: Trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture dislocations are associated with inferior patient reported outcome measures, decreased range of motion, and increased complication rates compared to trans-olecranon or Monteggia variant fracture dislocations. Further research is needed to determine the most appropriate treatment for this difficult injury pattern.

Ultrasound, a new adjuvant method for treating acute Monteggia fracture in children.

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of using ultrasound-guided Kirschner wire or elastic intramedullary nail for fixation in the treatment of acute Monteggia fracture in children. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 31 cases of acute Monteggia fracture in children treated with ultrasound-guided Kirschner wire or elastic intramedullary nail fixation between April 2020 and December 2022, including 14 cases of Kirschner wire fixation and 17 cases of elastic intramedullary nail fixation. During the operation, soft tissue compression and nerve and vascular injuries were explored, fracture reduction was performed under ultrasound guidance, and operation time was recorded. After the operation, X-ray examination was conducted to assess the quality of fracture reduction. At the last follow-up, the flexion, extension, pronation, and supination angles of both affected and unaffected elbow joints were measured, and the Mayo score was used to evaluate elbow joint function. RESULTS: The average duration of surgery was 50.16 ± 19.21 min (ranging from 20 to 100 min). Based on the evaluation criteria for assessing reduction quality, 28 cases were deemed excellent, while 3 cases were considered good. After immobilization with long-arm cast for 4-6 weeks postoperatively, elbow and forearm rotation exercises were performed. Kirschner wires were removed after an average of 6.64 ± 0.93 weeks (ranging from 6 to 9 weeks) postoperatively, and elastic intramedullary nails were removed after an average of 5.12 ± 1.54 months (ranging from 4 to 10 months) postoperatively. The average follow-up time was 19.13 ± 11.22 months (ranging from 4 to 36 months). During the final follow-up, the affected limb's range of motion in flexion, extension, pronation, and supination was (141.16 ± 4.24)°, (4.61 ± 2.81)°, (84.52 ± 3.74)°, and (84.23 ± 3.69)°, respectively. There was no notable variance when compared to the healthy limb, which had a range of motion of (141.81 ± 2.99)°, (4.81 ± 2.50)°, (85.61 ± 3.12)°, and (85.03 ± 2.73)° (P > 0.05). The Mayo Elbow Performance index classified 29 cases as excellent and 2 cases as good. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided Kirschner wire or elastic intramedullary nail fixation can be used for the treatment of acute Monteggia fracture in children, which can explore the surrounding nerves, blood vessels, and soft tissue compression, reduce the difficulty of reduction, and cause minimal trauma. It can greatly reduce the risk of radiation exposure and complications such as vascular and nerve injury during the operation.

A coronoid-centric classification system of proximal trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations has almost perfect intraobserver and interobserver agreement.

BACKGROUND: Fracture-dislocations of the elbow, particularly those that involve a fracture through the proximal ulna, are complex and can be difficult to manage. Moreover, current classification systems often cannot discriminate between Monteggia-variant injury patterns and trans-olecranon fracture-dislocations, particularly when the fracture involves the coronoid. The Mayo classification of proximal trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations categorizes these fractures into 3 types according to what the coronoid is still attached to: trans-olecranon fracture-dislocations (the coronoid is still attached to the ulnar metaphysis); Monteggia-variant fracture-dislocations (the coronoid is still attached to the olecranon); and ulnar basal coronoid fracture-dislocations (the coronoid is not attached to either the olecranon or the ulnar metaphysis). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver agreement of the Mayo classification system when assessing elbow fracture-dislocations involving the proximal ulna based on radiographs and computed tomography scans. METHODS: Three fellowship-trained shoulder and elbow surgeons and 2 fellowship-trained orthopedic trauma surgeons blindly and independently evaluated the radiographs and computed tomography scans of 90 consecutive proximal trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations treated at a level I trauma center. The inclusion criteria included subluxation or dislocation of the elbow and/or radioulnar joint with a complete fracture through the proximal ulna. Each surgeon classified all fractures according to the Mayo classification, which is based on what the coronoid remains attached to (ulnar metaphysis, olecranon, or neither). Intraobserver reliability was determined by scrambling the order of the fractures and having each observer classify all the fractures again after a washout period ≥ 6 weeks. Interobserver reliability was obtained to assess the overall agreement between observers. κ Values were calculated for both intraobserver reliability and interobserver reliability. RESULTS: The average intraobserver agreement was 0.87 (almost perfect agreement; range, 0.76-0.91). Interobserver agreement was 0.80 (substantial agreement; range, 0.70-0.90) for the first reading session and 0.89 (almost perfect agreement; range, 0.85-0.93) for the second reading session. The overall average interobserver agreement was 0.85 (almost perfect agreement; range, 0.79-0.91). CONCLUSION: Classifying proximal trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations based on what the coronoid remains attached to (olecranon, ulnar metaphysis, or neither) was associated with almost perfect intraobserver and interobserver agreement, regardless of trauma vs. shoulder and elbow fellowship training. Further research is needed to determine whether the use of this classification system leads to the application of principles specific to the management of these injuries and translates into better outcomes.

Functional outcomes of pediatric true and equivalent Monteggia fractures - Review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to describe the functional outcome of true and equivalent Monteggia fracture-dislocations in the pediatric population. We also provided a review of the literature about the treatment options. METHODS: Five surgically and three conservatively treated patients were identified who were treated in 2009-2021. The study pop-ulation consisted of six female and two male patients. The mean age at the time of treatment was 7. The mean follow-up time was 55 months (range, 12-128). The Mayo Elbow Performance Score and the Oxford Elbow Score were used for outcome evaluation. Range of motion and grip strengths were also evaluated. RESULTS: There were two Bado type 1 and six Monteggia equivalent injuries. Closed reduction and casting were utilized for the two Bado type 1 injuries as the initial treatment. However, one had a radial head re-dislocation and had to be treated operatively. This patient had a radial head re-dislocation after the surgery and was followed up conservatively. Three Monteggia equivalent injuries were treated with closed reduction and casting, with no complications. One patient had a radial head anterior dislocation with plastic deformation of the ulna, and this patient was managed with CORA-based corrective ulnar osteotomy. For Monteggia injuries, the main treatment objective is to restore the ulnar length. Bilateral computed tomography imaging with 3D reconstruction can be utilized in preoperative planning of Monteggia fracture-dislocations to customize the treatment. Close observation is essential to detect radial head subluxation, which needs early intervention before irreversible changes occur. CONCLUSION: The true/equivalent Monteggia fractures' main treatment goal is to restore the ulnar length. Conservative treatment, with a close follow-up, is the first option if closed reduction can be achieved. If closed reduction is not possible, careful preop-erative planning and early rehabilitation are key to success for management of Monteggia fractures.

Exposed Intramedullary Fixation Produces Similar Outcomes to Buried Fixation for Acute Pediatric Monteggia Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of acute pediatric Monteggia fractures requires ulnar length stability to maintain reduction of the radiocapitellar joint. When operative care is indicated, intramedullary ulna fixation can be buried or left temporarily exposed through the skin while under a cast. The authors hypothesized that treatment with exposed fixation yields equivalent results to buried fixation for Monteggia fractures while avoiding secondary surgery for hardware removal. METHODS: A retrospective review of children with acute Monteggia fractures at our Level 1 pediatric trauma center was performed. Patient charts and radiographs were evaluated for age, fracture type, fracture location, Bado classification, type of treatment, complications, cast duration, time to fracture union, time to hardware removal, and range of motion. RESULTS: Out of 59 acute Monteggia fractures surgically treated (average age 6 y, range 2 to 14), 15 (25%) patients were fixed with buried intramedullary fixation and 44 (75%) with exposed intramedullary fixation under a cast. There were no significant differences between buried and exposed intramedullary fixation in cast time after surgery (39 vs. 37 d; P =0.55), time to fracture union (37 vs. 35 d; P =0.67), pronation/supination (137 vs. 134 degrees; P =0.68) or flexion/extension (115 vs. 114 degrees; P =0.81) range of motion. The exposed fixation had a return to OR of 4.5% (2 out of 44), and the buried fixation returned to the OR for removal on all patients. CONCLUSION: Exposed intramedullary fixation yielded equivalent clinical outcomes to buried devices in the treatment of acute pediatric Monteggia fractures while eliminating the need for a second surgery to remove hardware, reducing the associated risks and costs of surgery and anesthesia, but had a higher complication rate. Open Monteggia fractures or patterns with a known risk of delayed union may benefit from buried instead of exposed intramedullary fixation for earlier mobilization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Ulnar osteotomy and monolateral external fixator for the treatment of chronic Monteggia fractures in children: comparison between gradual and acute radial head reduction.

This study evaluated the outcomes of chronic Monteggia fractures (CMFs) treated by ulnar osteotomy and monolateral external fixator (MEF), and compare the outcome of gradual versus acute radial head reduction. Two groups of patients were identified. Group 1: gradual reduction of the radial head ( n = 13); group 2: acute reduction ( n = 6). Clinical outcome was evaluated by Kim Elbow Score, whereas radiographic outcome was assessed on plain radiographs. The effect of age, side, time from initial trauma to surgery, rate of unplanned surgery, amount of angulation and lengthening, and final outcome were evaluated. Univariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with good radiographic outcome. Thirteen patients underwent gradual correction of the ulna. The mean duration of correction was 43.4 days (range, 21-82); the mean angulation and lengthening of the ulna were 22.8° (range, 0°-35°) and 22.2 mm (range, 12.2-40.9), respectively. Six patients underwent acute reduction intraoperatively, the mean angulation and lengthening of the ulna were 17.2° (range, 4°-33.9°) and 5.2 mm (range, 2.5-12.2), respectively. CMF treated by ulnar osteotomy and gradual distraction had better radiological outcome (Group 1; 92.3% 12/13) than those treated by acute reduction of the radial head (Group 2; 3/6, 50%) ( P = 0.071). Reoperation rate was found to be significantly correlated with a fair or poor radiographic results ( P = 0.016). Good clinical and radiological outcomes should be expected in CMF patients treated by gradual lengthening and angulation of the ulna with a MEF.

Radial head distalisation with an external ring fixator as a therapy option in children with chronic posttraumatic radiocapitellar dislocations.

PURPOSE: Missed monteggia-type injuries in children can result in chronic radial head dislocation with anatomic changes and osteoarticular remodeling of the radial head. In later stages, joint reconstruction is impossible and a functional radial head distalization can be a therapy option in symptomatic patients. METHODS: From 2010 to 2018, 46 patients (18 female and 28 male, mean age 11.8 (4-20)) with chronic radius head dislocation treated in our institution were retrospectively analyzed. A radial head distalization was performed in symptomatic patients at the time of ulna lengthening and angulation by use of an external ring fixator. We analyzed the surgical and radiographic data as well as the clinical outcome of the patients measured by DASH and Mayo Elbow score. RESULTS: 16 patients (6 female, 10 male) fulfilled the criteria for functional radial head distalization. Main reason was Monteggia injury in 11 cases, and radial head fracture in 5 cases. Average follow-up was 5.1 years (range 1-9, SD 2.1). Mean time from injury was 4.14 years (range: 4 months to 12 years, SD 3.5 years). Mean duration of external fixation was 106 days (range 56-182, SD 31.2), lengthening was 21.3 mm (range 12-42, SD 8.8). Average degree of sagittal angulation 14.8° (0-32°, SD 10.7°), coronal angulation 4.4° (0-25°, SD 7.3°). DASH score showed a good result with 2.4, and the MAYO Elbow Score was excellent (95/100). No secondary luxation of the radius head was detected. CONCLUSION: Radial head distalization with external ring fixator can be a therapy option for chronic radius head dislocations in symptomatic patients without losing stability of the elbow joint in contrast to radial head resection.

Monteggia fractures and Monteggia-like-lesions: a systematic review.

Monteggia injuries are rare, but severe injuries of the elbow including various injury patterns. Treatment of these injuries is still topic of debate and strategies differ widely. In this systematic review on Monteggia injuries in adults, we aimed to clarify the incidence of different injury patterns within Monteggia injuries, investigate the main reasons leading to revision surgery and explore which surgical treatments should be favored to achieve satisfactory clinical results.We initially identified 182 publications and ultimately included 17 retrospective studies comprising 651 cases. All patients were classified using the Bado classification, leading to 30.5% Bado type I fractures, 60.4% type II fractures, 5.1% type III and 3.1% type IV fractures. Mean revision rate was 23%. Ulna non-union (28%) and limited range-of-motion (22%) are the main reasons for revision surgery. Meta-analysis shows a trend toward the use of locking plates for ulna fixation which may lead to less revision surgery and fewer ulna non-unions. Further biomechanical and clinical research is necessary to clarify the role of radial head surgery.

To Angulate or Not to Angulate the Ulna during the Progressive Distraction Period Performed with a Monolateral External Fixator in Paediatric Patients with a Chronic Monteggia Fracture?

Background and Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic evolution of chronic Monteggia fractures (CMFs) treated by ulnar osteotomy and monolateral external fixators (MEFs) with or without angulation of the ulna during the distraction period. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study evaluated 20 children (14 boys and 6 girls) with CMFs. According to the strategy of ulnar lengthening, two groups of patients were identified: patients undergoing gradual lengthening with (Group A, n = 11) or without ulna angulation (Group B, n = 9). The mean age at the time of surgery was 7.7 years old (range, 5.4−12.9). The mean time from initial trauma to surgery was 26.3 months (range, 1−96), and the mean follow-up was 24.6 months (range, 5.5−45.4). Clinical outcomes were evaluated by Kim et al.'s Elbow Performance Score, while radiographic outcomes were assessed on plain radiographs. Results: Age at surgery, sex, laterality, time between trauma and surgery, and time of follow up in the two groups of patients showed no significant differences. The radial head was successfully reduced in 9 of 9 and 10 of 11 patients in Groups B and A, respectively (p = 1.00). The mean time to achieve radial head reduction was shorter in Group B (18.1 ± 5.3 days) than in Group A (39.2 ± 18.7 days; p = 0.004). The mean angulation of the ulna at the end of treatment was significantly lower in Group B (0.6° ± 1.1°) than in Group A (25.9° ± 6.3°; p < 0.0001). The average ulnar lengthening at the end of treatment in Group B (14.1 ± 5.8 mm) was, on average, 7.7 mm less than that in Group A (21.8 ± 9.7 mm; p = 0.05). The Kim et al. Elbow Performance Score at the last follow-up visit was comparable between the two groups of patients (p = 1.00). Conclusions: A shorter time to achieve radial head reduction and less deformity of the ulna can be expected in paediatric patients with CMFs undergoing intraoperative restoration of ulnar alignment and gradual lengthening without angulation postoperatively.

Comparison of the midterm result between locking plate and elastic intramedullary nail treating oblique ulnar fracture Bado type I acute monteggia fracture in pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND: Acute Monteggia fracture (AMF) is defined as a fracture of the proximal ulna combined with a dislocation of the radial head, with less than 1 percent prevalence in pediatric patients with an elbow injury. This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy of two treatment methods for oblique ulnar fracture AMF Bado type I in children. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 28 children with oblique ulnar fracture acute Monteggia injury Bado I were included. Patients was divided into two groups: In the EIN group 16 patients were fixed with elastic intramedullary nail after reduction, and in the LCP group 12 patients were fixed with locking compression plate after reduction. Operation time and blood loss were recorded and the patients were assessed clinically by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), range of movement(ROM) and range of rotation(ROR). RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were accessible for durable follow-up, with a mean age of 7.7 ± 1.3 years, follow up by 33.7 ± 5.1 months. The average operation time was 48.1 ± 9.2 min for the EIN group and 67.1 ± 7.2 min for the LCP group. The average blood loss was 8.2 ± 2.3 ml for the EIN group and 18.8 ± 3.8 ml for the LCP group. The average operation time and average blood loss in the EIN group are significant less than the LCP group. Mean MEPS, ROM, ROR in both group improved significantly before sugery to three months after surgery, and maintained very good results at last follow up. There is no significant difference between the EIN group and the LCP group in MEPS, ROM and ROR. CONCLUSIONS: Oblique ulnar fracture Bado type I acute monteggia fracture in pediatric patients fixed by EIN and LCP can both get good mid-term results measured by MEPS, ROM and ROR, Fixed by EIN have shorter operation time and less blood loss than fixed by LCP.

Novel use of close-wedge osteotomy and monorail external fixator in the treatment of chronic Monteggia fracture.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of close-wedge osteotomy and monorail external fixator in the treatment of chronic Monteggia fracture. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2014 and December 2021, data of a total of 22 patients (14 males, 8 females; mean age: 15.6±5.1 years; range, 6 to 25 years) who suffered from chronic Monteggia fractures were retrospectively reviewed. All the patients were treated for acute angulation of the ulna after osteotomy and gradual angulation for radial head reduction. Range of motion of the elbow and forearm, the angle between the longitudinal axis of proximal radius and the hypothesized Storen's line (RSA), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), as well as Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score were recorded preoperatively and at the final follow-up. RESULTS: Objective parameters were all significantly improved in the aspects of range of motions of the elbow and forearm, and RSA (21.4±4.5° preoperatively and 2.0±1.4° at the final follow-up, t=18.20, p<0.05). The level of pain due to the chronic injury was eliminated, as the mean VAS was significantly lower at the final follow-up compared to preoperative scoring (2.8±2.0 preoperatively and 0.5±0.9 at the final follow-up, t=4.86, p<0.05). The function of the elbow and upper limb was restored, which was indicated by improved MEPS (73.2±12.5 preoperatively and 96.6±6.4 at the final follow-up, t=7.70, p<0.05) and DASH (28.3±6.0 preoperatively and 4.1±2.0 at the final follow-up, t=19.35, p<0.05). No complication was observed. CONCLUSION: Close-wedge osteotomy and gradual lengthening with monorail external fixator in the treatment of chronic Monteggia fracture showed great efficacy. We also provided a specified osteotomy site aiming at PRUJ reconstruction.

Reoperations and Radiographic Outcomes of Monteggia Variant Facture Repair Through a Trans-Olecranon Approach.

BACKGROUND: Adult Monteggia fracture variants are rare but potentially devastating injuries to the elbow generally requiring surgical treatment. Monteggia injuries with co- existing fractures of the radial head and coronoid present a surgical challenge due to the need to adequately expose all components of the injury for internal fixation or arthroplasty. In this study, we evaluated the clinical outcomes following surgical treatment of adult Monteggia fracture variants in which a coexisting radial head or coronoid fracture was ad- dressed through a single extensile posterior trans-olecranon approach. METHODS: A retrospective review of all adult patients who underwent fixation of Monteggia variant fractures with coexisting radial head and coronoid fractures through a trans-olecranon approach by a single surgeon from January 1, 2012, to January 1, 2021, was performed. Patient records were reviewed for demographic information, radiographic outcomes, and postoperative complications leading to re- operation. RESULTS: A total of 13 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study, three males and 10 females. The average age of the patients was 64 years old, and patients were followed for an average of 9.9 months postoperatively. Six patients underwent re-operation: one for flap coverage due to wound necrosis, two for revision fixation due to early loss of fixation, two for removal of painful hardware, and one for arthroscopic capsulectomy to treat a flexion contracture. Twelve patients achieved radiographic union and one patient had not achieved union by 1.3 months postoperatively and thereafter did not undergo further radiographic follow-up. No cases of heterotopic ossification, capitellar erosions, overstuffing of a radial head implant, or residual elbow subluxation were seen. There were two cases of lucency around a prosthetic radial head implant stem but without migration of the implant.

Risk factors for redislocation of chronic Monteggia fracture-dislocation in children after reconstruction surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Monteggia fracture-dislocation refers to traumatic ulnar fractures and dislocation of the radial head, which is one of the most frequently missed injuries, especially in children. The most widespread attitude towards chronic Monteggia lesion is the open reduction of the radial head associated with ulnar osteotomy with or without annular ligament reconstruction. Our study aimed to analyze the risk factors for redislocation after surgical management of chronic Monteggia lesion and the benefits of annular ligament reconstruction and radiocapitellar pinning in paediatric. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with reconstruction surgery for chronic Monteggia fracture-dislocation in our department between 2005 and 2017, with a minimum two years' follow-up. The reconstruction surgery included ulnar osteotomy performed in all patients, annular ligament repair or reconstruction or fixation of radiocapitellar joint, or radial osteotomy in some patients. We collected the related clinical data and evaluated the risk factors of redislocation using logistic regression analyses and a two-piecewise linear regression model with a smoothing function, after reconstruction. RESULTS: Throughout a mean six years' follow-up (range, 2-14 years), 62 patients (42 males, 20 females; average age 6.49 years range, 2-13 years) were reviewed. Of the radiocapitellar joints, 16.1% was noted to have redislocation. Univariate risk analysis showed age, time from injury to surgery, and radial osteotomy were risk factors for a recurrent radiocapitellar redislocation. Time from injury to surgery was found to be independent predictor of redislocation in multivariate analysis. However, there were significant nonlinear associations between time from injury to surgery and redislocation in multivariate logistic regression analysis after multivariate adjustment (p for nonlinear = 0.023). Every one month increase was associated with a 1.37-fold increase in redislocation, in participants within one year after injury. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the surgery of chronic Monteggia fracture-dislocation should be done as quickly as possible within one year after injury. Associated annular ligament reconstruction or fixation of radiocapitellar joint does not seem to be helpful.

Monteggia fractures: analysis of patient-reported outcome measurements in correlation with ulnar fracture localization.

BACKGROUND: Monteggia fractures and Monteggia-like lesions result after severe trauma and have high complication rates. Preliminary biomechanical studies suggested a correlation between ulnar fracture localization and clinical result. OBJECTIVES: Key objective was to evaluate whether the site of the ulnar fracture can be correlated to clinical outcome after open reduction and internal stabilization. METHODS: In a retrospective, monocentric study 35 patients who underwent surgical treatment after suffering a Monteggia injury or Monteggia-like lesion were included. Fractures were classified according to Bado and Jupiter, the site of the fracture location at the proximal ulna and regarding the potential accompanying ligamentary injury. In a follow-up examination validated patient-reported outcome measures and functional parameters were evaluated. Furthermore, treatment strategy and complications were analysed. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 51.9 years (± 18.0). 69% were females (n = 24). Follow-up took place after 50.5 months (± 22.1). Fractures were classified according to Bado (I:2, II:27, III:4, IV:2). Bado II-fractures were further classified according to Jupiter (A:7, B:16, C:3, D:1). Cases were divided into subgroups depending upon the distance of the ulnar fracture site in respect to its distal endpoint (A: < 7 cm and B: > 7 cm). Average overall MEPS was 84.1 (± 19.0). Oxford elbow score and DASH were 37.2 (± 10.5) and 20.4 (± 20.5). Average extension capability reached - 7° (± 7.5). Mean flexion was 134.8° (± 19.7). Average pain according to visual analogue scale was 1.6 (± 1.9). We found no differences between the subgroups regarding the PROMs. Subgroup A displayed a worse extension capability (p = 0.027) and patients were significantly older (p < 0.01). Comparing patients with and without fracture of the radial head, we observed no differences. Patients with an accompanying injury of the coronoid process displayed higher pain levels (p = 0.011), a worse functionality (p = 0.027) and overall lower scoring in PROM. CONCLUSION: The presented results suggest that in Monteggia fractures and Monteggia-like lesions, the localization of the ulna fracture can give a hint for its postoperative outcome. However, we could not confirm the hypothesis of an increasing instability in ulnar fractures located further distally (high severity of the potential ligamentous injury). Intraarticular fractures or injuries with a close relation to the joint have a worse prognosis, especially if the coronoid process is injured. Trial registration Registration was done with ClinicalTrials.gov under NCT05325268.

Influence of ulnar bow sign on surgical treatment of missed Bado type I Monteggia fracture in children.

The present study aimed to explore the influence of ulnar bow on the surgical treatment of Bado type I missed Monteggia fracture in children. A retrospective review of 28 patients was conducted between November 2010 and June 2020. All patients were treated with open reduction of the radial head and ulnar opening wedge osteotomy without annular ligament reconstruction. Four months (range 1-12 months) was the mean interval between injury onset and surgery. The average age of patients at the time of surgery was 6.1 years old (range 2-10 years old). The maximum ulnar bow (MUB) and MUB position (P-MUB) via radiography were evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups according to P-MUB, as follows: middle group (A) included 17 cases, and the MUB was located at 40-60% of the distal ulna; and distal group (B) included 11 cases, and the MUB was located at 20-40% from the distal end of the ulna. The mean follow-up period was 33 months (range 6-102 months). At the last follow-up, all the children showed stable reduction of the radial head, and the flexion function of elbow joint improved after the operation (P < 0.05). Group A presented a larger ratio of maximum ulnar bow (R-MUB) and angle of ulnar osteotomy (OA) than group B (P < 0.05). The osteotomy angle was positively correlated with the R-MUB (R2 = 0.394, P = 0.038). The osteotomy angle was positively correlated with the P-MUB (R2 = 0.683, P = 0.000). The R-MUB was proportional to the P-MUB (R2 = 0.459, P < 0.0001). The regression equation of P-MUB and osteotomy angle was as follows: OA = 32.64* P-MUB + 7.206. If the ulnar bow was positioned at the middle ulna, then a stable reduction of radial head needed to be achieved through a large angle in the ulnar osteotomy. If the position of maximum ulnar bow (P-MUB) was closer to the middle of the ulna, or the ratio of maximum ulnar bow (R-MUB) was larger, then the osteotomy angle was larger.

Pediatric Monteggia Fracture Outcome Assessment - Preliminary Report.

BACKGROUND: The term Monteggia fracture refers to a class of injuries encompassing the fracture of the proximal end of the ulna with subluxation or dislocation of the radial head. These injuries account for 0.4-1% of all forearm fractures in children. Despite its low incidence, Monteggia fractures require particular attention, since as much as 30-50% of the cases may be unrecognized, which subsequently leads to complications. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate treatment outcomes of Monteggia fractures in children. Both conservative treatment and surgery were analyzed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 15 children (7 boys and 8 girls) between the ages of 4-16.3 years (mean age 8.3 years) with Monteggia fractures were hospitalized at our center in the years 2015-2020. Closed reduction and immobilization in a cast were performed in 12 patients, while three children underwent surgical treatment with internal fixation of the ulna. The radial head dislocation was reduced successfully in every patient. RESULTS: Every child from the study group who received conservative treatment regained full elbow mobility as well as normal forearm supination and pronation. Only one of the patients who underwent the surgery demonstrated a 20° deficit in elbow flexion that did not affect limb function. CONCLUSIONS: 1. Our experience shows that closed reduction together with immobilization in a cast is usually a sufficient treatment in Monteggia fractures. 2. However, the dislocated radial head should be properly reduced in all patients. 3. Correct diagnosis and treatment followed by appropriate rehabilitation result in full recovery and no mobility limitations in children and teenagers.

Delayed anterolateral radial head dislocation secondary to radial shaft fracture malunion: A case report.

RATIONALE: Traumatic radial head dislocation (RHD) can occur due to hyperpronation injury with sequential disruption of the annular ligament, quadrate ligament, and the interosseous membrane. Although studies have shown that traumatic RHD is generally associated with Monteggia fracture-dislocation, traumatic RHD occurring with ipsilateral radial shaft fractures has rarely been reported. Delayed RHD secondary to the malunion of isolated radial shaft fractures is extremely rare. PATIENT CONCERNS: We report the case of a 12-year-old right-handed boy with progressive pain and limited range of motion in the right elbow. DIAGNOSIS: The patient was diagnosed with delayed RHD associated with radial shaft fracture malunion. INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOMES: A corrective osteotomy was performed at the site of malunion with open reduction of the radial head using an extensile lateral approach. The annular ligament was disrupted. Forearm rotation causes radial head subluxation Therefore, the Bell Tawse procedure was additionally performed to reconstruct the annular ligament by turning down a strip of triceps tendon and anchoring it around the radial neck. LESSONS: Malunion of the radial shaft can cause delayed RHD with a limited elbow range of motion. Annular reconstruction using a strip of the triceps tendon and corrective osteotomy of the radial shaft with an extensile lateral approach may be useful for treating this rare entity or situation.

Monteggia Fracture-Dislocation.

A Monteggia fracture-dislocation involves a proximal one-third of the ulna fracture with a concomitant dislocation of the radial head proximally at the elbow. This fracture and dislocation often results from a fall on the outstretched hand (FOOSH) low-energy mechanism of injury. One must have a high index of suspicion with any ulnar fractures to look for a radial head dislocation so that the dislocation component is not missed. These injuries often require early orthopedic intervention. Any delays in treatment can lead to poor long-term outcomes including chronic valgus instability and radiocapitellar osteoarthrosis.

Use of an external fixator during one-step surgical management of missed chronic Monteggia injuries.

The incidence of untreated Monteggia fracture-dislocations is not insignificant. But there is no consensus as to the surgical indication and best surgical technique to use. Single-stage reduction of the radial head through an elbow arthrotomy and ulnar osteotomy is a complex surgical procedure that requires stabilization of the ulnar segments during every step of the intervention. Here, we describe the possibility of using an external fixator intraoperatively to facilitate the various steps of the procedure: (1) gradual distraction and angulation of the osteotomy site to allow thorough excision of any interposed capsular tissue, (2) stable hold on the ulnar fragments independent of the surgical assistant, which allows the stability of the radial head reduction to be tested in pronation and supination and (3) facilitation of plate fixation at the ulnar osteotomy site. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; case series.

Predictors of ideal outcomes after reconstructive surgery for chronic Monteggia fracture in children.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to analyze surgical outcomes of reconstructive surgery for chronic Monteggia fracture, which is one of the most challenging problems for orthopaedic surgeons. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients were followed during 55.6 ± 32.0 months after open reduction of the radial head combined with ulnar osteotomy and annular ligament reconstruction. The mean interval from trauma was 15.1 ± 19.6 months, and the mean age at the surgery was 9.1 ± 3.5 years. In addition to the chronological age, elbow maturity was assessed using the Sauvegrain score. Surgical outcomes were primarily evaluated using the Kim's score. In addition, we newly defined more successful criteria for the ideal surgical outcomes, equivalent to preinjury status. RESULTS: There were 19 excellent, 3 good, 4 fair, and 2 poor outcomes based on the Kim's scoring system. Among the 19 patients with excellent outcomes, 14 met our criteria for the ideal outcomes. The age (p < 0.001) and the Sauvegrain score (p < 0.001) were lower, and the interval (p = 0.004) was shorter in 14 patients with ideal outcomes. There were 9 patients with preoperative deformation of the radial head, and all of them showed non-ideal outcomes. In regression analyses, lower Sauvegrain score (p = 0.004) and shorter interval (p = 0.012) were associated with higher postoperative Kim's score, and lower Sauvegrain score (p = 0.031) was related to the achievement of the ideal outcomes. With the Sauvegrain score of >21.5, all patients had postoperative re-dislocation or osteoarthritic changes regardless of the interval. With the Sauvegrain score of <21.5 and an interval of ≤7 months, the ideal outcomes were achieved in 85.7%, and no patients had postoperative re-dislocation or osteoarthritic changes. CONCLUSION: Over the skeletal ages of 14 years in boys and 11.5 years in girls, reconstructive surgery must be cautiously indicated. Under these skeletal ages with an interval of ≤7 months and undeformed radial head, it appears to be ideal. STUDY DESIGN: Level III, Retrospective comparative study.