The use of denosumab in osteoporosis - an update on efficacy and drug safety.

INTRODUCTION: Denosumab (Prolia) is a fully human monoclonal antibody against the receptor activator of the nuclear factor kappaB ligand. It is a potent antiresorptive agent that reduces osteoclastogenesis. AREAS COVERED: Denosumab has been shown to improve bone mineral density and reduce the incidence of new fractures in postmenopausal women and men. It is also used in the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, as well as for the prevention of bone loss and reduction of fracture risk in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for non-metastatic prostate cancer and women receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer. Initial safety concerns included infections, cancer, skin reactions, cardiovascular disease, hypocalcemia, osteonecrosis of the jaw, and atypical femur fractures; however, further study and experience provide reassurance on these issues. Anecdotal reports have raised concerns about an increased risk of multiple vertebral fractures following discontinuation of denosumab. EXPERT OPINION: Although bisphosphonates are often selected as initial therapy for osteoporosis, denosumab may be an appropriate initial therapy in patients at high risk for fracture, including older patients who have difficulty with the dosing requirements of oral bisphosphonates, as well as patients who are intolerant of, unresponsive to, or have contraindications to other therapies. Additional data is needed to address questions regarding treatment duration and discontinuation.

Polypharmacy and risk of fractures in older adults: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Fractures have serious health consequences in older adults. While some medications are individually associated with increased risk of falls and fractures, it is not clear if this holds true for the use of many medications (polypharmacy). We aimed to identify what is known about the association between polypharmacy and the risk of fractures in adults aged ≥65 and to examine the methods used to study this association. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review with narrative synthesis of studies published up to October 2023 in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and the grey literature. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts, then performed data extraction and quality assessment. RESULTS: Among the 31 studies included, 11 different definitions of polypharmacy were used and were based on three medication counting methods (concurrent use 15/31, cumulative use over a period 6/31, daily average 3/31, and indeterminate 7/31). Overall, polypharmacy was frequent and associated with higher fracture risk. A dose-response relationship between increasing number of medications and increased risk of fractures was observed. However, only seven studies adjusted for major confounders (age, sex, and chronic disease). The quality of the studies ranged from poor to high. CONCLUSIONS: Polypharmacy appears to be a relevant modifiable risk factor for fractures in older individuals that can easily be used to identify those at risk. The diversity of medication calculation methods and definitions of polypharmacy highlights the importance of a detailed methodology to understand and compare results.

Risk of Fractures and Falls in Men with Advanced or Metastatic Prostate Cancer Receiving Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Treated with Novel Androgen Receptor Signalling Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

CONTEXT: The addition of androgen receptor signalling inhibitors (ARSIs) to standard androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has improved survival outcomes in patients with advanced prostate cancer (PCa). Advanced PCa patients have a higher incidence of osteoporosis, compounded by rapid bone density loss upon commencement of ADT resulting in an increased fracture risk. The effect of treatment intensification with ARSIs on fall and fracture risk is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of falls and fractures in men with PCa treated with ARSIs. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review of EMBASE, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, and The Health Technology Assessment Database for randomised control trials between 1990 and June 2023 was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses guidance. Risk ratios were estimated for the incidence of fracture and fall events. Subgroup analyses by grade of event and disease state were conducted. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Twenty-three studies were eligible for inclusion. Fracture outcomes were reported in 17 studies (N = 18 811) and fall outcomes in 16 studies (N = 16 537). A pooled analysis demonstrated that ARSIs increased the risk of fractures (relative risk [RR] 2.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.00-2.71; p < 0.01) and falls (RR 2.22, 95% CI 1.81-2.72; p < 0.01) compared with control. A subgroup analysis demonstrated an increased risk of both fractures (RR 2.13, 95% CI 1.70-2.67; p < 0.01) and falls (RR 2.19, 95% CI 1.53-3.12; p < 0.0001) in metastatic hormone-sensitive PCa patients, and an increased risk of fractures in the nonmetastatic (RR 2.27, 95% CI 1.60-3.20; p < 0.00001) and metastatic castrate-resistant (RR 2.85, 95% CI 2.16-3.76; p < 0.00001) settings. The key limitations include an inability to distinguish fragility from pathological fractures and potential for a competing risk bias. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of an ARSI to standard ADT significantly increases the risk of fractures and falls in men with prostate cancer. PATIENT SUMMARY: We found a significantly increased risk of both fractures and falls with a combination of novel androgen signalling inhibitors and traditional forms of hormone therapy.

Vertebral Body Reshaping after Fractures: An Important Index of Recovery in Glucocorticoid-Treated Children.

PURPOSE: In this 6-year study we identified factors associated with spontaneous vertebral body reshaping in glucocorticoid (GC)-treated children with leukemia, rheumatic disorders, and nephrotic syndrome. METHODS: Subjects were 79 children (mean age 7.4 years) who had vertebral fracture (VF) evaluation on lateral spine radiographs at least 1 year after VF detection. VF were graded using the modified Genant semiquantitative method and fracture burden for individuals was quantified using the spinal deformity index (SDI; sum of grades from T4 to L4). RESULTS: Sixty-five children (82.3%) underwent complete vertebral body reshaping (median time from VF detection to complete reshaping 1.3 years by Cox proportional hazard modeling). Of 237 VF, the majority (83.1%) ultimately reshaped, with 87.2% reshaping in the thoracic region vs 70.7% in the lumbar region (P = .004). Cox models showed that (1) every g/m2 increase in GC exposure in the first year after VF detection was associated with a 19% decline in the probability of reshaping; (2) each unit increase in the SDI at the time of VF detection was associated with a 19% decline in the probability of reshaping [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.71, 0.92; P = .001]; (3) each additional VF present at the time of VF detection reduced reshaping by 25% (HR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.62, 0.90; P = .002); and (4) each higher grade of VF severity decreased reshaping by 65% (HR = 0.35; 95% CI = 0.21, 0.57; P < .001). CONCLUSION: After experiencing a VF, children with higher GC exposure, higher SDI, more severe fractures, or lumbar VF were at increased risk for persistent vertebral deformity.

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors vs Incretin-Based Drugs and Risk of Fractures for Type 2 Diabetes.

Importance: Postmenopausal individuals with type 2 diabetes are susceptible to fractures due to the interaction of elevated blood glucose levels and a deficiency of the hormone estrogen. Despite continued concerns of fracture risks associated with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), existing evidence in this high-risk population is lacking. Objective: To assess the risk of fractures associated with SGLT2i vs incretin-based drugs of dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA), separately, in postmenopausal individuals with type 2 diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This active-comparator, new-user cohort study used nationwide claims data of Korea and took place from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2020. Postmenopausal individuals (aged ≥45 years) with type 2 diabetes were included. Exposures: New users of SGLT2i or comparator drugs. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was overall fractures, comprising vertebral, hip, humerus, and distal radius fractures. Patients were followed up from the day after drug initiation until the earliest of outcome occurrence, drug discontinuation (90-day grace period) or switch, death, or end of the study period. After propensity score fine stratification, hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were estimated using weighted Cox models. Results: Among 37 530 (mean [SD] age, 60.6 [9.7] years) and 332 004 (mean [SD] age, 60.6 [9.9] years) new users of SGLT2i and DPP4i, respectively, a lower rate of incident overall fractures was presented with SGLT2i vs DPP4i (weighted HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72-0.84). Among 111 835 (mean [SD] age, 61.4 [9.8] years) and 8177 (mean [SD] age, 61.1 [10.3] years) new users of SGLT2i and GLP1RA, respectively, no association with an increased risk of overall fractures was presented with SGLT2i vs GLP1RA (weighted HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.68-1.24). Results from several subgroup and sensitivity analyses presented consistent results from main analysis. Conclusions and relevance: This population-based cohort study suggests that SGLT2i was not associated with an increased rate of incident fractures compared with DPP4i and GLP1RA, separately, among postmenopausal individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Romosozumab is associated with greater trabecular bone score improvement compared to denosumab in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

In this study, romosozumab demonstrated significantly greater improvement in trabecular bone score compared to denosumab therapy in postmenopausal women previously treated with antiresorptive agents. Notably, in patients previously treated with anti-resorptive agents, treatment with romosozumab resulted in similar increases in trabecular bone score compared to that of drug-naïve patients. PURPOSE: Romosozumab significantly increases bone mineral density (BMD) and rapidly reduces fracture risk. Whether romosozumab can improve the spinal trabecular bone score (TBS) as a bone quality indicator merits further investigation. METHODS: Data for postmenopausal women starting romosozumab or denosumab treatment at Severance Hospital, Korea, were analyzed. Romosozumab and denosumab groups were 1:1 matched using propensity scores, considering relevant covariates. Good responders were defined as those with TBS improvement of 5.8% or greater. RESULTS: Overall, 174 patients (romosozumab, n = 87; denosumab, n = 87) were analyzed. Matched groups did not differ in age (64 years), weight, height, previous fracture (38%), lumbar spine or femoral neck BMD (T-score, -3.4 and -2.6, respectively), or prior bisphosphonate or selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) exposure (50%). The romosozumab group exhibited a greater increase in lumbar spine BMD (15.2% vs. 6.9%, p < 0.001) and TBS (3.7% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.013) than the denosumab group. In patients transitioning from bisphosphonate or SERM, romosozumab users showed greater improvement in TBS compared to denosumab users (3.9% versus 0.8%, P = 0.006); the drug-naive group showed no significant difference (3.6% versus 2.7%, P = 0.472). The romosozumab group had a higher proportion of good responders than the denosumab group (33.3% vs. 18.4%, p = 0.024). Romosozumab therapy for 12 months resulted in 3.8-fold higher odds of a good response in TBS than denosumab after covariate adjustment (adjusted odds ratio 3.85, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Romosozumab could improve bone mass and bone quality, measured by TBS, in postmenopausal osteoporosis, particularly as a subsequent regimen in patients previously taking anti-resorptive agents.

Efficacy and safety of different antimicrobial DURATions for the treatment of Infections associated with Osteosynthesis Material implanted after long bone fractures (DURATIOM): Protocol for a randomized, pragmatic trial.

BACKGROUND: Infection associated with osteosynthesis material (IOM) is one of the most feared and challenging complications of trauma surgery and can cause significant functional loss, requiring multiple interventions and excessive consumption of antimicrobials. Evidence is needed about the best surgical procedure and the duration of antibiotic treatment according to the age of the implant or onset of infection symptoms, as it considers the biofilm formation and the state of fracture healing. There were not clinical trials evaluating the optimal duration of antibiotic therapy in IOM when implant is retained. Because there are antibiotics that have proven to be effective for the treatment of infection associated to implant, mainly in PJI, these antibiotics could be used in these infections. Investigating whether shorter duration of treatment is a priority in infectious diseases, as a way to reduce the exposure to antibiotics and help in controlling antimicrobial resistance and avoiding unnecessary adverse events and cost. We aim to describe the hypothesis, objectives, design, variables and procedures for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial comparing different durations of antibiotic treatment in IOM after long bone fractures treated with debridement and implant retention. METHODS AND DESIGN: This is a multicenter, open-label, non-inferiority, randomized, controlled, pragmatic phase 3 trial, comparing different durations of antibiotic treatment in IOM after long bone fractures treated with debridement and implant retention. Patients with microbiologically confirmed IOM will be included. Eligible patients are those older than 14 years, with early IOM (up to 2 weeks after the implant surgery) and delayed IOM (between 3 and 10 weeks after the implant surgery) with stabilized fracture and absence of bone exposure who sign the informed consent. Randomization will be 1:1 to receive a short-term antibiotic treatment (8 weeks in early IOM and 12 weeks in delayed IOM) or a long-term antibiotic treatment (12 weeks in early IOM or until fracture healing or implant removal in delayed IOM). The antibiotic treatment will be that used in routine practice by the specialist in infectious diseases. The primary outcome is the composited variable "cure" that includes clinical cure, radiological healing, and definitive soft tissue coverage, which will be evaluated in the test of cure at 12 months after the end of antibiotic therapy. Adverse events, resistance development during therapy and functional status will be collected. A total of 364 patients are needed to show a 10% non-inferiority margin, with 80% power and 5% one-sided significance level. DISCUSSION: If the hypothesis of non-inferiority of short vs. long antibiotic treatments is demonstrated, and the efficacy of antibiotics with less ecological impact in long treatments, the impact on reduction of bacterial resistance, toxicity and health costs will be observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05294796) on Jan 26th 2022 and at the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials (EUDRACT) (2021-003914-38) on Jul 16th 2021. The Sponsor Study Code is DURATIOM.

Review of bone health in women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer receiving endocrine therapy.

In estrogen-receptor-positive tumors, adjuvant endocrine therapy has been shown to be highly beneficial for both overall and disease-free survival. Estradiol is key in regulating bone and mineral physiology, and several studies found a strong correlation between these therapies and the risk of fractures. Since these therapies are often given for 5 through 10 years, the timing for bisphosphonates or denosumab initiation seems essential to managing bone metabolism. However, gray zones and discrepancies between guidelines remain as to the best threshold when to start antiresorptive treatment, or whether antiresorptive treatment should be administered to every woman undergoing adjuvant endocrine therapy, independent of their risk factors for fractures. Treatment options and strategies should be discussed at the start of hormone adjuvant therapy to come to a shared decision with the patient, with the final aim of reducing the risk of future fractures as much as possible. This review will cover present guidelines and literature on antiresorptive treatment in this setting, to provide clinicians with useful clues for managing these patients.

Real World Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic, Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated With Radium-223 in Routine Clinical Practice in Sweden.

AIM: Estimate the effect of Radium-223 (Ra-223) on the incidence of bone fractures, prostate cancer death, and all-cause death compared with other standard treatments for metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). METHODS: Using a cohort design, we estimated the effect of Ra-223 on the risk of bone fractures, all-cause and prostate cancer-specific mortality across different lines of treatment for mCRPC using Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden (2013-2018). The comparator group comprised other standard treatments for mCRPC. We used 36-month risk differences and hazard ratios (HRs) as effect estimates. RESULTS: The number of eligible individuals was 635, 453, 262, and 84 for the first-, second-, third-, and fourth-line cohorts, respectively. When compared Ra-223 to other standard treatments, the difference in the 36-month risk of fracture was 6% (95% confidence interval [CI], -7% to 18%) in the first-line cohort (n = 635) and 8% (95% CI, -7% to 18%) in the second-line cohort (n = 453). The number of fractures in the third-/fourth-line cohorts was too small for an adjusted comparison. The difference in 36-month mortality was higher in the first-line cohort 13% (95% CI, -3% to 31%), but lower in the second- and third-/fourth-line cohorts-8% (95% CI, -23% to 7%) and -14% (95% CI, -21% to 16%) respectively. Most deaths were due to prostate cancer. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that the difference in the risk of fractures is small, if any. A difference in the risk of mortality may be present in first-line treatment, but a decreased risk of mortality was observed in second and later lines of treatment. The results on mortality need to be considered in the context of potential unmeasured or residual confounding.

[Retrospective practice-related care research study on therapy of mCPRC with radium-223 dichloride]. / Retrospektive Versorgungsstudie von d-uo zur Therapie des mCRPC mit Radium-223-dichlorid.

During phase III study ERA-223, patients under combination therapy with radium-223 and abiraterone showed an increased risk of bone fractures and a possible higher risk of death. This observation led to a change in the German therapeutic guidelines in 2018. Radium-223 is now only allowed as a third-line monotherapy (besides ADT) in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with symptomatic bone lesions without known visceral metastases or for patients with mCRPC, for whom no other available systematic therapy is suitable. Since almost no data on practice-related care research on the use of radium-223 exist, we consulted members of d-uo (German Uro-Oncologists) over their therapy algorithms. This study analysed data of patients treated with radium-223 between 2014 and 2019. It could be shown that 50% of mCRPC-patients had received radium-223 in the past as third-line therapy. Half of these were treated in combination with new androgen receptor targeted therapies (ARTA) and no increase in bone fractures was observed. This was most likely due to the additional use of bone protecting agents. Despite the late cancer stage, treatment response was seen in almost half of the patients.

The impact of acute fracture on interpretation of bone turnover marker measurements for patients starting anti-resorptive therapies.

INTRODUCTION: Bone turnover markers (BTM) are used in evaluating patients' response to anti-resorptive agents (ARA). Fracture and its healing process, however, can influence the measurements, which might make their interpretation difficult in patients with a recent fracture. We aimed to evaluate the effect of oral ARA on changes in BTM levels in patients with a recent distal radius fracture (DRF). METHODS: In 143 women who had a new DRF and then received oral ARA including selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM, n = 101), and bisphosphonate (n = 42), we measured serum cross-linked C-telopeptides of type I collagen (CTXI) and osteocalcin, at baseline and six months, as well as lumbar and total hip bone mineral density (BMD) at baseline and one year after fracture. We determined the predictive value of BTM at six months in determining one-year responses in BMD. RESULTS: Both BTM levels decreased significantly at six months, with the average decrease of 27 ± 63% for CTX-I and 11% ± 37% for osteocalcin. The percent changes of BTM at six months were independent predictors of the BMD change. Cutoff points of 50.0% CTX-I decrease and 23.5% for osteocalcin decrease had the highest sensitivities and specificities for detecting BMD responders for bisphosphonate users, but cutoffs could not be found for SERM users. CONCLUSION: Although a fresh fracture can influence BTM, ARA therapy significantly reduced their levels and their percent change at six months could predict BMD improvement at one year. However, adjusted cutoff points can be necessary to increase sensitivity for detecting patients responsive to ARA treatment after a new DRF.

Therapeutic Options for the Management of Aromatase Inhibitor- Associated Bone Loss.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most commonly occurring cancer in women worldwide. Early breast cancer is a kind of invasive neoplasm that has not proliferated beyond the breast or the axillary lymph nodes. Current therapeutic strategies for breast cancer mainly include local therapies such as surgery or radiotherapy and systemic therapies like chemotherapy, endocrine, and targeted therapy. Nowadays, the adjuvant treatment for hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer in postmenopausal women remains the main effective systemic therapy which can improve disease- free survival and overall survival; it involves several endocrine treatment regimens, including Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs), Aromatase Inhibitors (AIs), or a combination of them. AIs have been shown to be more effective in preventing recurrence in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer when compared with tamoxifen, thus representing the standard of care for adjuvant endocrine therapy. Although AIs are usually well-tolerated, they can have some side effects. Apart from the appearance of arthralgias or myalgias and cardiovascular events, AI therapies, reducing already low endogenous postmenopausal estradiol levels, cause increased bone loss and increase fracture risk in postmenopausal women. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review is to evaluate the therapeutic options in the management of Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Bone Loss (AIBL). METHODS: We reviewed the current literature dealing with different therapeutic options in the treatment of AIBL. RESULTS: Clinical practice guidelines recommend a careful evaluation of skeletal health in all women with breast cancer before AI therapy initiation. Adequate calcium and vitamin D intake have also been suggested. Pharmacological attempts to minimize AI-related bone loss have focused on the use of antiresorptive agents, such as bisphosphonates and denosumab to protect bone integrity and reduce the risk of fractures. Furthermore, clinical trials have shown that by making the bone microenvironment less susceptible to breast cancer metastasis, these drugs are able to increase disease- free survival. CONCLUSIONS: AI, that are the pillar of the systemic treatment for patients with hormone receptorpositive breast cancer, are associated with different side effects, and in particular, osteoporosis and fractures. Both bisphosphonates and denosumab are able to prevent this negative effect.

Polypharmacy and bone fracture risk in patients with type 2 diabetes: The Fukuoka Diabetes Registry.

AIMS: To prospectively investigate the association between the number of prescribed drugs and the fracture risk in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Japanese participants with type 2 diabetes (n = 4,706; 2,755 men, 1,951 postmenopausal women; mean age, 66 years) were followed for a median of 5.3 years and grouped on the basis of the number of prescribed drugs at baseline. The main outcomes were fractures at any anatomic site and fragility fractures (fractures at hip and spine sites). RESULTS: During follow-up, any fracture occurred in 662 participants. The overall age- and sex-adjusted fracture incidence rates per 1,000 person-years were 21.2 (0-2 drugs), 28.1 (3-5 drugs), 37.7 (6-8 drugs), and 44.0 (≥9 drugs) (p for trend < 0.001). Compared with 0-2 drugs, the multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for fractures were 1.34 (1.07-1.68) for 3-5 drugs, 1.76 (1.37-2.26) for 6-8 drugs, and 1.71 (1.27-2.31) in ≥ 9 drugs. The multivariate-adjusted HR (95% CI) per increment in drugs was 1.05 (1.02-1.08) (p < 0.001). Similar tendencies were observed for fragility fractures. CONCLUSIONS: A greater number of prescribed drugs is associated with an increased bone fracture risk in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Polyvinylpyrrolidone deposition disease in patients with intravenous opioid use: a case series.

The polymer polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) is an excipient widely used in prescription drugs. Depending on the molecular weight (MW), parenterally administered PVP may accumulate in various tissues. Consequently, moderate and high MW PVP have only been used in oral preparations since the late 1970s. Surprisingly, starting in 2009, pathology departments in Norway received biopsies revealing PVP deposition, all from patients with a history of intravenous drug use. We identified 13 patients with PVP deposition and re-evaluated 31 biopsies and two autopsies. Common indications for biopsy were renal insufficiency, anemia, pathological fractures, and abdominal complaints. We observed PVP deposits in all biopsies (kidney, hematopoietic bone marrow, bone, gastrointestinal tract, lymph node, and skin) and all sampled tissue from the autopsies. Overall, the clinical findings could be related to PVP deposits in the biopsies. In the most seriously affected patients, PVP deposition caused severe organ dysfunction and contributed to the fatal outcomes of two patients. All patients except for one were prescribed opioid substitution drugs (OSDs), and most of the patients admitted to having injected such medications. Several OSDs contain PVP. One methadone formulation that was marketed in Norway from 2007 to 2014 contained large amounts of very high MW PVP, making it the most likely source of PVP deposition. Although the presumed source of PVP in these patients has now been withdrawn from the market, pathologists should be aware of PVP deposits when evaluating biopsies from this patient group.

Is There an Association Between Bone Microarchitecture and Fracture in Patients who were Treated for High-grade Osteosarcoma? A Controlled Study at Long-term Follow-up Using High-resolution Peripheral Quantitative CT.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with primary osteosarcoma improves survival rates, but it also causes side effects in various organs including bone. Low bone mineral density (BMD) can occur owing partly to chemotherapy or limited mobility. This can cause a higher risk of fractures compared with those who do not receive such treatment. Changes in BMD alone cannot explain the propensity of fractures. Studying microarchitectural changes of bone might help to understand the effect. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Do patients who were treated for osteosarcoma (more than 20 years previously) have low BMD? (2) Do these patients experience more fractures than controls who do not have osteosarcoma? (3) What differences in bone microarchitecture are present between patients treated for high-grade osteosarcoma and individuals who have never had osteosarcoma? METHODS: We contacted 48 patients who were treated for osteosarcoma and who participated in an earlier study. These patients underwent multimodal treatment including chemotherapy more than 20 years ago. Of the original patient group, 60% (29 of 48) were missing, leaving 40% (19 of 48) available for inclusion in this study; all 19 agreed to participate. There were nine men and 10 women with a mean age of 46 ± 4 years and a mean time from surgery to examination of 28 ± 3 years. BMD was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, and any fracture history was assessed using a questionnaire. Additionally, high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT was performed to compare the groups in terms of microarchitectural changes, such as cortical and trabecular area, cortical and trabecular thickness, cortical porosity, and endocortical perimeter. Participants in the control group were selected from a cohort consisting of a population-based random sample of 499 healthy adult women and men. Osteoporosis or low BMD was not an exclusion criterion for entering this study; however, the patients in the control group were selected based on a normal BMD (that is, T score > -1.0 at both the spine and hip). Also, the participants were matched based on age and sex. Differences between patients and controls were assessed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and a chi-square test for categorical variables. A multiple regression analysis was performed. Model assumptions were checked using histograms and quantile-quantile plots of residuals. RESULTS: Twelve of 19 patients who were treated for osteosarcoma had either osteopenia (eight patients) or osteoporosis (four patients). More patients with osteosarcoma reported sustaining fractures (11 of 19 patients) than did control patients (2 of 19 controls; p < 0.001). Among all microarchitectural parameters, only the endocortical perimeter was increased in patients compared with the control group (75 ± 15 mm versus 62 ± 18 mm; p = 0.04); we found no differences between the groups in terms of cortical and trabecular area, cortical and trabecular thickness, or cortical porosity. CONCLUSION: Although patients who were treated for osteosarcoma had osteopenic or osteoporotic BMD and a higher proportion of patients experienced fractures than did patients in the control group, we could not confirm differences in microarchitectural parameters using high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT. Therefore, it seems that bone geometry and microstructural parameters are not likely the cause of the increased proportion of fractures observed in our patients who were treated for osteosarcoma. Until we learn more about the bone changes associated with chemotherapy in patients with osteosarcoma, we recommend that patients undergo regular BMD testing, and we recommend that physicians consider osteoporosis treatment in patients with low BMD. These data might provide the impetus for future multicenter prospective studies examining the association between chemotherapy and bone microarchitecture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Androgen-deprivation therapy and the risk of newly developed fractures in patients with prostate cancer: a nationwide cohort study in Korea.

We evaluated the risk of osteoporosis and fractures associated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) use and duration in men with prostate cancer. From the nationwide claims database in South Korea, a total of 218,203 men with prostate cancer were identified between 2008 and 2017. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 144,670 patients were included in the analysis. To adjust for comorbidities between cohorts, 1:1 propensity score matching was used. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of events associated with ADT, after controlling for potential confounding factors. In the matched cohort, there were differences in the incidence of newly developed osteoporosis (8.79% in the ADT group vs. 7.08% in the non-ADT group, p < 0.0001) and fractures (8.12% in the ADT group vs. 5.04% in the non-ADT group, p < 0.0001). Age-adjusted Cox regression analysis revealed that the ADT group had a significantly higher risk of osteoporosis (HR, 1.381; 95% CI, 1.305-1.461; p < 0.0001) and fractures (HR, 1.815; 95% CI, 1.703-1.935; p < 0.0001) compared to the non-ADT group. Furthermore, the risk of osteoporosis and fractures increased as the duration of ADT increased. The ADT was associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis and fractures in prostate cancer patients. Clinicians who administer ADT for patients with prostate cancer should always be mindful of the risk of osteoporosis and fracture, avoid unnecessary ADT, and perform regular bone health check-ups.

Bone fracture as a novel immune-related adverse event with immune checkpoint inhibitors: Case series and large-scale pharmacovigilance analysis.

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are associated with different immune-related adverse events (irAEs), the potential effect on the skeleton is poorly defined albeit biologically plausible and assessable through pharmacovigilance. We described a case series of patients experiencing skeletal fractures while on ICIs at the National Cancer Institute of Milan. To better characterize the clinical features of skeletal irAEs reported with ICIs, we queried the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and performed disproportionality analysis by means of reporting odds ratios (RORs), deemed significant by a lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (LL95% CI) > 1. Bone AEs emerging as significant were scrutinized in terms of demographic and clinical data, including concomitant irAEs or drugs affecting bone resorption or causing bone damage. Four patients with skeletal events while on ICIs were included in our case series, of which three exhibited vertebral fractures. In FAERS, 650 patients with bone and joint injuries and treated with ICIs were retrieved, accounting for 822 drug-event pairs. Statistically significant ROR was found for eight, two and one bone AEs respectively with PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors, being pathological fracture (N = 46; ROR = 3.17; LL95%CI = 2.37), spinal compression fracture (42; 2.51; 1.91), and femoral neck fracture (26; 2.38; 1.62) the most common. Concomitant irAEs or drugs affecting bone metabolism were poorly reported. The increased reporting of serious vertebral fractures in patients without concomitant irAEs and no apparent preexisting risk factors could suggest a possible cause-effect relationship and calls for close clinical monitoring and implementation of dedicated guidelines.

Fracture risk increased by concurrent use of central nervous system agents in older people: Nationwide case-crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Multiple medication use among older patients is reported to increase fracture risk. But this association is unclear in different subgroups and has not been confirmed by a case-crossover study, which can eliminate measurable and unmeasurable time-invariant confounders. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the fragility fracture risk associated with concurrent use of multiple central nervous system (CNS) agents in older patients using a case-crossover design. METHODS: This study targeted almost all patients aged ≥65 years in Japan who incurred fragility fractures from May 2013 to September 2014, based on the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan (NDB Japan). Conditional logistic regression analysis estimated the risk of fragility fracture associated with the daily number of CNS agents, including subgroup analyses stratified by sex, age, and fracture location. RESULTS: For 446,101 patients, the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of fragility fracture increased almost linearly with number of CNS agents; 0, 0-1, 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, 4-5, and >5: OR reference, 1.21 (95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.23), 1.40 (1.35-1.46), 1.58 (1.49-1.67), 1.89 (1.74-2.05), 1.80 (1.60-2.03), and 1.90 (1.61-2.23; trend p < 0.001), respectively. A similar trend was observed for several subgroups, especially in males and those aged ≥85 years, showing marked linearity. CONCLUSIONS: The increased risk of fragility fracture associated with the use of multiple CNS agents was robust in older people in Japan.

Bone fractures in patients using tapentadol or oxycodone: an exploratory US claims database study.

Aim: To explore fracture outcomes with tapentadol or oxycodone, two opioids with differing mechanisms of action. Materials & methods: Retrospective cohort pilot study, using MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental claims databases, on patients with postoperative pain, back pain, or osteoarthritis and ≥1 claim for tapentadol (n = 16,457), oxycodone (n = 1,356,920), or both (n = 15,893) between June 2009 and December 2015. Results: During 266,826 and 9,007,889 days of tapentadol and oxycodone treatment, patients evidenced 1080 and 72,275 fractures, respectively. Fracture rates per treatment-year were 1.512 for tapentadol and 3.013 for oxycodone. Conclusion: Examination of administrative claims has inherent limitations, but this exploratory analysis indicates a lower fracture rate with tapentadol than oxycodone in the analyzed dataset, which needs confirmation by further clinical trials.