Risk factors for periprosthetic femoral fracture risk around a cemented polished taper-slip stem using an osteoporotic composite bone model.

This biomechanical study aimed to determine if variations in stem material, stem geometry, stem offset and cement viscosity affect mechanical resistance to postoperative periprosthetic fracture (PFF) after hip arthroplasty with a commonly used cemented polished taper-slip (PTS) stem (CPT, Zimmer Biomet) in a novel osteoporotic composite femoral bone model. Thirty-six osteoporotic composite femoral models were tested using a standardised in-vitro loading technique to simulate a typical PFF. Outcome measures were torque to failure (N), fracture energy (N/m2) and rotation to failure (°). Comparisons were made by stem material (cobalt chrome vs stainless steel), stem geometry (CPT stem vs Exeter stem), stem offset (standard offset vs extra extended offset) and cement viscosity (high viscosity vs low viscosity). Statistical comparisons were carried out with significance set at p < 0.05. All tested samples produced clinically representative fracture patterns with varying degrees of bone and cement comminution. There was no statistically significant difference in torque to failure, fracture energy or rotation to failure between any of the compared variables (all p > 0.05). This is the first biomechanical study on mechanical resistance to PFF using osteoporotic composite bone models. For the CPT stem, it confirms that stem material, stem offset, stem geometry and cement viscosity do not affect mechanical resistance to PFF in an osteoporotic bone model.

Mean 23-Year Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modular Femoral Stem With Metaphyseal Fixation Sleeve.

BACKGROUND: Although the modular sleeve concept for femoral implants has several advantages, studies reporting on greater than 20-year outcomes are limited. This study aimed to report the mean 23-year results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a modular stem with metaphyseal fixation sleeve. METHODS: This study reviewed primary THAs performed using a modular stem between October 1994 and April 1998. Of the 272 hips (221 patients) identified, 220 hips (177 patients) satisfying the minimum 20-year follow-up were included. The Harris Hip Score was used for clinical evaluation. Final hip radiographs were analyzed to evaluate the implant stability and the extent of femoral osteolysis. The mean follow-up duration was 23 years (range, 20 to 28). RESULTS: The mean Harris Hip Score improved from 38 points (range, 26 to 67) preoperatively to 90 points (range, 71 to 100) at the final follow-up (P < .001). Femoral osteolysis was observed in 146 hips (67.1%), but 145 were located proximal to the osseo-integrated sleeve. Overall, 4 femoral revisions were performed; 2 for chronic infection, one for aseptic loosening, and one for periprosthetic femoral fracture. Of the 19 (8.6%) periprosthetic femoral fractures, the most common type was Vancouver AG (13 hips). One (0.5%) asymptomatic distal stem fracture occurred, while no complications were identified at the stem-sleeve junction. Implant survivorship free of any femoral revision was 98.3% at 23 years. CONCLUSIONS: A THA using a modular stem with metaphyseal fixation sleeve demonstrated 98.3% stem survivorship with excellent clinical outcomes at a mean follow-up of 23 years in non-obese patients.

Operative treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the proximal femur with a contralateral, upside-down LISS plate in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: Increasing expectancy of life and levels of activity in the growing geriatric population lead to a rising number of prosthetic implants of the hip and consequently the incidence of periprosthetic fractures of the femur increase. The fracture pattern and the possible instability of the stem are a challenge to the orthopaedic surgeon. Treatment options are complete replacement of the implant or a solitary osteosynthesis. The goal of this study was to analyse the feasibility of the operative intervention using a contralateral reversed anatomic distal femoral LISS® locking plate and the radiological and functional outcome in a geriatric cohort. METHODS: We included all patients older than 75 years of age with a Vancouver type B fracture, which have been treated by osteosynthesis using a LISS® (contralateral reversed) plate in our institution in an interdisciplinary ortho-geriatric setting between 7/2013 and 12/2021. Perioperative morbidities, clinical and radiological outcome during follow-up were retrospectively analysed. RESULTS: During the observed time period, 83 patients (mean age: 88 years (range: 76-103), male/female: 26/57) were treated. Most fractures were Vancouver type B2 (n = 45, 54%) followed by B1 (n = 20, 24%) and B3 (n = 18, 22%). The most prevalent postoperative surgical complication was anaemia (n = 73, 88%) followed by infections (n = 12, 14%, urinary infections, pneumonia) and cardiovascular decompensation (n = 8, 10%). Clinical and radiological follow up 6-8 weeks postoperative was possible for 59 patients (70%). The majority of them did not describe pain (n = 50, 85%) and had a good or excellent radiological outcome. Three cases needed revision surgery due to infection and another three due to non-union, loosening of the stem or an additional fracture. 1-year mortality was 30%. CONCLUSION: We are convinced that the reversed contralateral LISS-plate is an easy-to-use implant with a small complication rate but a very successful and high healing rate in a geriatric, polymorbid cohort.

Body Mass Index and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does Cause for Revision Vary by Underweight or Obese Status?

BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI) impacts risk for revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA), but the relationship between BMI and cause for revision remains unclear. We hypothesized that patients in different BMI classes would have disparate risk for causes of rTKA. METHODS: There were 171,856 patients who underwent rTKA from 2006 to 2020 from a national database. Patients were classified as underweight (BMI < 19), normal-weight, overweight/obese (BMI 25 to 39.9), or morbidly obese (BMI > 40). Multivariable logistic regressions adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, payer status, hospital geographic setting, and comorbidities were used to examine the effect of BMI on risk for different rTKA causes. RESULTS: Compared to normal-weight controls, underweight patients were 62% less likely to undergo revision due to aseptic loosening, 40% less likely due to mechanical complications, 187% more likely due to periprosthetic fracture, 135% more likely due to periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Overweight/obese patients were 25% more likely to undergo revision due to aseptic loosening, 9% more likely due to mechanical complications, 17% less likely due to periprosthetic fracture, and 24% less likely due to PJI. Morbidly obese patients were 20% more likely to undergo revision due to aseptic loosening, 5% more likely due to mechanical complications, and 6% less likely due to PJI. CONCLUSION: Mechanical reasons were more likely to be the cause of rTKA in overweight/obese and morbidly obese patients, compared to underweight patients, for whom revision was more likely to be infection or fracture related. Increased awareness of these differences may promote patient-specific management to reduce complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Incidence of Instability Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Continues to Decline in the Medicare Population.

BACKGROUND: Instability has been the primary cause of failure following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) leading to revision hip surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine if instability rates have further declined following advances in primary THA, including dual mobility articulations, direct anterior approaches, advanced technologies, and improved knowledge of the hip-spine relationships. METHODS: Using the 5% Medicare Part B claims data from 1999 to 2019, we identified 81,573 patients who underwent primary THA for osteoarthritis. Patients who experienced instability at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years were identified. Multivariate cox regression analyses evaluated the effect of patient and procedure characteristics on the risk of instability. RESULTS: Instability at 1 year following primary THA declined from approximately 4% in 2000 to 2.3% in 2010 and 1.6% in 2018. The leading cause of revision surgery was infection (18.6%), followed by periprosthetic fracture (14%), mechanical loosening (11.5%), and instability (9.4%). High-risk groups for instability continue to include increased age, higher Charlson index, obesity, lumbar spine pathology, and neurocognitive disorders. CONCLUSION: Instability is no longer the leading etiology of failure following primary THA with a decline of approximately 40% over the past decade. Infection, periprosthetic fracture, mechanical loosening, and then instability are now the leading causes of failure. Multiple factors may play a role in the decline of instability, including increased use of dual mobility articulations, direct anterior approaches, improved knowledge of the hip-spine relationships, and use of advanced technologies.

The Stability of Fixation of Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: Effect of Implantation Technique.

BACKGROUND: Due to increasing volume of total hip arthroplasties, periprosthetic femoral fractures have become a common complication with increased revision burden and perioperative morbidity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the fixation stability of Vancouver B2 fractures treated with 2 techniques. METHODS: A common B2 fracture was created by reviewing 30 type B2 cases. The fracture was then reproduced in 7 pairs of cadaveric femora. The specimens were divided into 2 groups. In Group I ("reduce-first"), the fragments were reduced first, followed by implantation of a tapered fluted stem. In Group II ("ream-first"), the stem was implanted in the distal femur first, followed by fragment reduction and fixation. Each specimen was loaded in a multiaxial testing frame with 70% of peak load during walking. A motion capture system was used to track the motion of the stem and fragments. RESULTS: The average stem diameter in Group II was 16.1 ± 0.4 mm, versus 15.4 ± 0.5 mm in Group I. The fixation stability was not significantly different in the 2 groups. After the testing, the average stem subsidence was 0.36 ± 0.31 mm and 0.19 ± 0.14 mm (P = .17) and the average rotation was 1.67 ± 1.30° and 0.91 ± 1.11° (P = .16) in Groups I and II, respectively. Compared to the stem, there was less motion of the fragments and there was no difference between the 2 groups (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: When tapered fluted stems were used in combination with cerclage cables for treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures, both the "reduce-first" and "ream-first" techniques showed adequate stem and fracture stability.

Contemporary Use of Trochanteric Plates in Periprosthetic Femur Fractures: A Displaced Trochanter Will Not Be Tamed.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the reoperation and complication rate following trochanteric plate fixation of greater trochanter (GT) periprosthetic femur fractures associated with total hip arthroplasty and to identify risk factors for subsequent reoperation, nonunion, and hardware failure (plate/cable breakage or migration). METHODS: Between 2010 and 2020, 44 patients who had 44 periprosthetic greater trochanter fractures at mean follow up of 2 years were retrospectively reviewed. Initial injury radiographs as well as immediate and final follow-up radiographs were evaluated. Subsequent reoperations, nonunion, and cases of hardware failure were identified. There were 22 (50%) Vancouver B2 fractures and 22 (50%) Vancouver A fractures. RESULTS: The 2-year cumulative probability of any subsequent reoperation was 20%. There were 9 total subsequent reoperations. The trochanteric fracture went on to nonunion in 14 patients (39%), and hardware failure occurred in 10 (28%) patients. A trochanteric bolt was used in addition to the trochanteric plate in 6 patients (14%), of which 4 (67%) patients had trochanteric plate displacement and 3 (50%) patients had trochanteric nonunion. Displacement of the greater trochanter prior to fixation was a predictor of subsequent nonunion (77% versus 23%, P = .02). CONCLUSION: In this large contemporary series, there was a high incidence of reoperation (20%) with in the first 2-years following plating of periprosthetic GT fractures, as well as a high rate of nonunion (39%), and hardware failure (28%). Displacement of the GT prior to plating predicted nonunion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective observational study.

A comparison of mortality rates following revision hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic fracture, infection or aseptic loosening.

BACKGROUND: Mortality following revision hip surgery for periprosthetic fracture (PPF) is comparable to neck of femur fractures. Our institution provides a regional "PPF Service". The aim of this study was to determine the time to surgery and mortality rate for PPF, compared to revision for infection or aseptic loosening. METHODS: Revision arthroplasty procedures performed for PPF, infection or aseptic loosening between January 2014 and December 2015 were identified. Comparisons were made between the 3 groups for baseline demographics, admission to higher-level care, length of stay, complications and mortality. RESULTS: There were 37 PPF, 71 infected and 221 aseptic revisions. PPF had a higher proportion of females (65% vs. 39% in infection and 53% in aseptic; p = 0.031) and grade 3 and 4 ASA patients (p = 0.006). Median time to surgery for PPF was 8 days (95% CI, 6-16). Single-stage procedures were performed in 84% of PPF, 42% of infections and 99% of aseptic revisions (p < 0.001). 19% of PPF revisions required HDU admission, 1% in the aseptic group and none in the infection group. Median length of stay was significantly different (PPF 10; infection 14; aseptic 8 days (p < 0.001). The 1-year mortality rate for PPF was 0%, 2.8% for infection and 0.9% in the aseptic group (p = 0.342). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the PPF group having higher ASA grades and more HDU admissions, our 1-year mortality rate was 0% and not significantly different to infection or aseptic loosening. Our low complication and 1-year mortality rate is encouraging and supports the safety of a regional "Periprosthetic Fracture Service".

Utility of synovial calprotectin lateral flow test to exclude chronic prosthetic joint infection in periprosthetic fractures: a prospective cohort study.

The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) requires a combination of various clinical, laboratory, microbiological and histopathological parameters. A concomitant periprosthetic fracture (PPF) further complicates the diagnosis as it causes a confounding local inflammatory response. Synovial calprotectin has been demonstrated as a promising biomarker of PJI. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the reliability of synovial calprotectin for the pre- or intraoperative diagnosis of PJI in PFF. 30 patients with PPF and implant loosening were included in this prospective study. Synovial fluid with white blood cells and percentage of polymorphonuclear neutrophils, serum C-reactive protein, and synovial calprotectin using a lateral-flow assay were tested against the EBJIS definition with adjusted thresholds to account for the local inflammation. 14 patients were postoperatively classified as confirmed infections (ten total hip arthroplasties and fourtotal knee arthroplasties). The calprotectin assay yielded a sensitivity of 0.71 [0.48; 0.95], a specificity of 0.69 [0.46; 0.91], a positive predictive value of 0.67 [0.43; 0.91] and a negative predictive value of 0.73 [0.51; 0.96]. Calprotectin is a promising diagnostic parameter for the detection of a PJI in a PPF. The lateral flow assay offers prompt results, which may further assist the surgeon in addition to already existing parameters of PJI diagnostics to diagnose concomitant PJI in PPF during surgery.

Successful Plate Fixation with Long Intramedullary Fibula Bone Graft for Periprosthetic Femur Fracture: A Case Report.

Background and objectives: Treatment of a displaced or comminuted periprosthetic distal femur fracture is challenging, especially in patients with osteoporosis. In this case report, we shared our successful surgical experience of using a long intramedullary fibula bone graft in a plate fixation surgery for a periprosthetic distal femur fracture in an extremely elderly patient with osteoporosis. Case report: A 95-year-old woman with severe osteoporosis (bone mineral density level: -3.0) presented with right knee pain and deformity after a fall, and a right periprosthetic distal femur fracture was identified. The patient underwent an open reduction and an internal plate fixation surgery with the application of a long intramedullary fibular bone graft. Due to a solid fixation, immediate weight-bearing was allowed after the surgery. She could walk independently without any valgus or varus malalignment or shortening 3 months after the surgery. A solid union was achieved 4 months postoperatively. Conclusions: We present a case wherein a long intramedullary allogenous fibula strut bone graft was used successfully to treat a right periprosthetic femur fracture in an extremely elderly patient. A long allogenous fibula bone graft can act not only as a firm structure for bridging the bone defect but also as a guide for precise component alignment. We believe this treatment option for periprosthetic fractures is beneficial for achieving biological and mechanical stability and facilitates early mobilization and weight-bearing for the patient.

Modes of failure of hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture.

BACKGROUND: Hemiarthroplasty is a common treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures, but limited Canadian data are available about hemiarthroplasty failure. We evaluated the frequency and predictors of hemiarthroplasty failure in Manitoba. METHODS: In this retrospective multicentre province-wide study, billing and joint registry databases showed 4693 patients who had hemiarthroplasty for treatment of femoral neck fracture in Manitoba over an 11-year period (2005-2015), including 155 hips with subsequent reoperations (open or closed) for treatment of hemiarthroplasty failure. Hospital records were reviewed to identify modes of hemiarthroplasty failure, comorbidities and reoperations. Data were analyzed using χ2 test and Poisson and γ regression models. RESULTS: During our study period, 155 hips (154 patients [3%]) underwent 230 reoperations. Of these, 131 hips (85%) initially had an uncemented unipolar modular implant. Indications for first-time reoperation included periprosthetic femur fracture (49 hips [32%]), dislocation (45 hips [29%]), acetabular wear (28 hips [18%]) and infection (26 hips [17%]). There were 46 hips (30%) that had 2 or more reoperations. Reoperation for dislocation was associated with presence of dementia; acetabular wear was associated with absence of dementia. Time from hemiarthroplasty to reoperation was associated inversely with age at hemiarthroplasty, dislocation and dementia and was directly associated with acetabular wear. The risk of having 2 or more reoperations was associated independently with dislocation, infection, and alcohol abuse. CONCLUSION: Hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture in Manitoba had a low frequency of failure. Risk factors for multiple reoperations included dislocation, infection and alcohol abuse.

Metal and composite bone plates for B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture in healthy and osteoporotic condition: A comparative biomechanical study.

The major concern after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the incidence of periprosthetic fracture in the weaker bone, which can lead to subsequent revision surgery. Achieving the suitable fixation without affecting the stability of the well-fixed prosthesis remains controversial. Most of the studies examined the behavior of the Periprosthetic Fracture (PF) fixation (Vancouver "B1" type) through computational and experimentation on healthy bone condition with metal plates. The aim of the present study is to analyze the influences of the metal and composite bone plate PF fixation on the axial and shear movement at the fracture site. The PF fixation constructs were modeled with medical graded stainless-steel plate (construct A), titanium plate (construct B) and carbon/epoxy composite bone plate (construct C) with 12 holes and a 4 mm fracture gap. Analysis was carried out for all the stages (stage 1-Normal bone, stage 2-THA, stage 3-Immediate Post-Operative (IPO), stage 4-Post-Operative (PO) and, stage 5-Healed Bone (HB)) under various loadings for intact and osteoporosis conditions. The results showed higher stress in cortical bone for stage 3, whereas in all the other stages lower stresses were experienced in the cortical and cancelous bone under peak load in construct C for osteoporosis model compared with other constructs. The present study suggested the construct C may be suitable for osteoporosis bone conditions.

Total Hip Arthroplasties for Hartofilakidis Type C1 and C2 High Hip Dislocations Demonstrate Similar Survivorship and Clinical Function at Minimum 10-year Follow-up With Cementless Implants.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the differences in survivorship, clinical function, and complications among patients who have Hartofilakidis Type C1 or C2 developmental dysplasia of the hips and underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) with cementless implants. METHODS: This retrospective study identified 84 Hartofilakidis Type C hips that underwent THA between 2002 and 2011 with a minimum 10-year follow-up (mean, 13 years, range, 10 to 19 years). Survivorship, latest Harris Hip Scores and satisfaction levels, radiographic outcomes (eg, implant stability, rate and length of subtrochanteric shortening transverse osteotomy, leg-length discrepancy, cup position, and orientation), as well as complications (eg, dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, periprosthetic joint infection) were compared to analyze the differences between Hartofilakidis C1 and C2 hips. RESULTS: Between C1 and C2 hips, no difference existed in the 15-year cumulative Kaplan-Meier survivorship, with the endpoint defined as any reoperation (93.1 versus 90.8%), aseptic loosening combined with periprosthetic joint infection (93.1 versus 96.2%), or aseptic loosening (94.8 versus 96.2%), latest Harris Hip Score (87.1 versus 86.1%), vertical (6.1 versus 6.0 mm) and horizontal (11.5 versus 10.3 mm) distance to the anatomic center of rotation, postoperative leg length discrepancy (11.2 versus 15.5 mm), dislocation (5.2 versus 11.5%), stem aseptic loosening (6.9 versus 7.7%), periprosthetic fracture (3.4 versus 7.7%), and intraoperative femoral fracture (32.8 versus 23.1%). However, Type C2 hips demonstrated more severe preoperative leg length discrepancy (66.9 versus 42.5 mm) and required a higher percentage of subtrochanteric shortening transverse osteotomies (84.6 versus 36.2%) that were longer (33.7 versus 26.47 mm) than the Type C1 hips. CONCLUSION: With cementless cups positioned near the anatomic acetabular center and cementless stems combined with subtrochanteric shortening transverse osteotomies, THAs for the Hartofilakidis Type C1 and C2 hips demonstrated similar survivorship, clinical function, and complications.

Clinical Outcomes Following Distal Femur Replacement for Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Management of periprosthetic distal femur fractures (PDFFs) is often complicated by poor bone quality and limited bone stock making fixation attempts challenging and prone to failure. Distal femoral replacement (DFR) is being used to treat such injuries although outcome data are mostly from small case series. We sought to systematically review the literature on DFR for PDFF to summarize their outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE (EBSCO), and Cochrane Central Database were searched to identify reports of PDFFs treated with DFR. Articles reporting on 5 or more knees were systematically reviewed for clinical function, complications, and mortality. Random effects meta-analysis was used to create summary estimates and publication bias also assessed. RESULTS: Of 287 identified and screened articles, 15 were included, 14 retrospective, reporting on 352 knees. Following DFR, 87% (95% confidence interval [CI] 71-95) of patients were able to ambulate. The mean postoperative Knee Society Score was 80 (95% CI 77-84). The risk of periprosthetic joint infection was 4.3% (95% CI 2.2-8.2). One-year postoperative mortality rate was 10% (95% CI 6-18). There was some evidence of publication bias with a trend toward smaller studies reporting lower infection risk and mortality. CONCLUSION: DFR for PDFFs is associated with high functional outcomes and a relatively modest risk of infection. The periprosthetic joint infection and 1-year mortality rates reported here should be considered lower bounds estimates due to publication bias and loss to follow-up. Further investigation of long-term outcomes following DFR for PDFFs is warranted though short-term functional outcomes are promising.

Use of a monoblock dual-mobility acetabular component in primary total hip arthroplasty in patients at high risk of dislocation.

INTRODUCTION: Dislocation is amongst the most common complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Dual-mobility bearings have been suggested as one way to reduce the risk of dislocation, particularly among patients at increased risk. The purpose of this study was to determine the outcomes of a monoblock dual-mobility shell for patients at high risk for dislocation following primary THA. METHODS: A total of 155 primary THAs with a monoblock, cementless dual-mobility acetabular component were performed in patients at high risk for dislocation. Two patients died prior to their two-year follow-up. The remaining 153 THAs were followed for a mean of 5.1 years (range: 2.1 to 9.3). RESULTS: There were no dislocations; however, four patients underwent revision surgery: one for an early periprosthetic acetabular fracture, one for an early periprosthetic femoral fracture, one for a late periprosthetic femoral fracture, and one for leg-length discrepancy. Intraoperative complications included one periprosthetic acetabular fracture treated with protected weight-bearing and one intraoperative proximal femoral fracture treated with cerclage wiring. Harris Hip Scores improved from a mean of 42.4 points preoperatively to a mean of 82.4 points postoperatively (p < 0.001). No cups were radiographically loose. At a mean follow-up of 5.1 years, survivorship of the acetabular component was 99.3% (95% CI, 98.1-100%) and survivorship without any reoperation was 97.4% (95% CI, 95.9-100%). DISCUSSION: Although there were no dislocations in this high-risk population, periprosthetic fractures of the femur and acetabulum were common with the implants utilised.

Atypical periprosthetic femoral fractures after arthroplasty for fracture are at high risk of complications.

It is difficult to investigate clinical features in a single-center study because atypical periprosthetic femoral fracture (APFF) is rare. This study aims to perform a nationwide survey of APFF to investigate the characteristics of this fracture and compare the clinical outcome with that of typical periprosthetic femoral fracture (typical PFF). A nationwide survey was performed asking for cooperation from 183 councilors of the Japanese Society for Fracture Repair. The subjects were patients with APFF injured between 2008 and 2017. The control group was comprised of patients with typical PFF of our facility injured in the same period. A total of 43 patients met the APFF definition. The control group was comprised of 75 patients with typical PFF. The rate of bisphosphonate use was significantly higher in the APFFs group than in the typical PFF group (62.8% and 32%, p < 0.02). The rate of cemented stem was significantly higher in the APFFs group than in the typical PFF group (30.2% and 6.7%, p < 0.001). In the patients with arthroplasty for hip fracture, multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that APFF was an independent risk factor of complications following the initial management (Odds ratio 11.1, 95% confidence interval 1.05-117.2, p = 0.045). However, no significant association between PFF and APFF was observed in the patients with arthroplasty for other hip diseases. The risk of complications was higher in the APFF group than in the typical PFF group in the patients with arthroplasty for fracture. When AFPP after arthroplasty for the fracture is suspected, it may be necessary to add not only internal fixation with a normal plate but also some additional treatment.

Do standards of care and early outcomes of periprosthetic fractures change during the COVID-19 pandemic? A multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) are a growing matter for orthopaedic surgeons, and patients with PPFs may represent a frail target in the case of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether hospital reorganisations during the most severe phase of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic affected standards of care and early outcomes of patients treated for PPFs in Northern Italy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were retrieved from a multicentre retrospective orthopaedics and traumatology database, including 14 hospitals. The following parameters were studied: demographics, results of nasopharyngeal swabs, prevalence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), comorbidities, general health status (EQ-5D-5L Score), frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale, CFS), pain (visual analogue scale, VAS), anaesthesiologic risk (American Society of Anaesthesiology Score, ASA Score), classification (unified classification system, UCS), type of operation and anaesthesia, in-hospital and early complications (Clavien-Dindo Classification, CDC), and length of stay (LOS). Data were analysed by means of descriptive statistics. Out of 1390 patients treated for any reason, 38 PPFs were included. RESULTS: Median age was 81 years (range 70-96 years). Twenty-three patients (60.5%) were swabbed on admission, and two of them (5.3%) tested positive; in three patients (7.9%), the diagnosis of COVID-19 was established on a clinical and radiological basis. Two more patients tested positive post-operatively, and one of them died due to COVID-19. Thirty-three patients (86.8%) presented a proximal femoral PPF. Median ASA Score was 3 (range, 1-4), median VAS score on admission was 3 (range, 0-6), median CFS was 4 (range, 1-8), median EQ-5D-5L Score was 3 in each one of the categories (range, 1-5). Twenty-three patients (60.5%) developed post-operative complications, and median CDC grade was 3 (range, 1-5). The median LOS was 12.8 days (range 2-36 days), and 21 patients (55.3%) were discharged home. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of PPFs did not seem to change during the lockdown. Patients were mainly elderly with comorbidities, and complications were frequently recorded post-operatively. Despite the difficult period for the healthcare system, hospitals were able to provide effective conventional surgical treatments for PPFs, which were not negatively influenced by the reorganisation. Continued efforts are required to optimise the treatment of these frail patients in the period of the pandemic, minimising the risk of contamination, and to limit the incidence of PPFs in the future. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Multivariate analysis of risk factors for re-dislocation after revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The treatment for recurrent dislocation of a total hip arthroplasty is surgical using varied techniques and technologies to reduce the chances of re-dislocation and re-revision. The goal of this study is to compare operative techniques to reduce re-dislocation and re-revision in revision hip arthroplasty due to recurrent dislocations. METHODS: A retrospective study of revision hip arthroplasties done due to recurrent dislocation prior to 01 January 2014. Electronic physician and provincial health records were used to collect patients' initial and follow-up data. Treatment failure was defined as either aseptic re-revision or re-dislocation without revision. Time to event was considered as the re-revision date or the date of second dislocation when the latter endpoint was used. RESULTS: Of 379 operations, 88 (23.2%) had aseptic repeat revision or recurrent dislocation. Of these: 66 (75.0%) due to dislocation with re-revision; 10 (11.4%) due to dislocation with no re-revision surgery; 5 (5.7%) due to aseptic loosening of components; 3 (3.4%) due to osteolysis; 3 (3.4%) due to pseudotumour; and 1 (1.1%) due to periprosthetic fracture. The following factors increase risk of failure: the use of augmented-liners (lipped, oblique and high-offset liners; HR = 1.68, 95% CI, 1.05-2.69), periprosthetic femur fracture (HR = 2.80, 95% CI, 1.39-8.21) and pelvic discontinuity (HR = 3.69, 95% CI, 1.66-8.21). Femur head sizes 36-40 mm are protective (HR = 0.54, 95% CI, 0.31-0.86). In abductor dysfunction the use of focal constrained liners decreases the risk of failure (HR = 0.13, 95% CI, 0.018-0.973). CONCLUSIONS: Larger head sizes and focal constrained liners (abductors dysfunction) should be used and fully constrained liners and augmented-liners should be avoided in a revision hip arthroplasty due to recurrent dislocations.

Use of Antibiotic Plates and Spacers for Fracture in the Setting of Periprosthetic Infection.

Prosthetic joint infection is a common cause of hip revision surgery, typically managed with a staged protocol and an antibiotic cement spacer. Patients being treated for prosthetic joint infection are at risk of fracture below the level of the spacer. Fracture in the setting of periprosthetic infection is a complex problem that requires the treating surgeon to use multiple techniques to achieve a successful outcome. The purpose of this case report is to highlight surgical strategies to successfully manage periprosthetic fractures complicated by infection.

Effect of Parkinson's Disease on Hemiarthroplasty Outcomes After Femoral Neck Fractures.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes following hemiarthroplasty (HA) for femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) compared with patients without PD. METHODS: This was a retrospective review utilizing the Nationwide Readmissions Database, a national database incorporating inpatient hospitalization information. Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, patients who underwent HA for FNF between 2010-2014 were identified. International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, codes were used to find a subset of patients with PD. Primary outcomes of interest included death, hospital readmission, periprosthetic fracture, postoperative dislocation, any revision surgery, and revision surgery for instability, fracture, or infection. RESULTS: There were a total of 7721 (4%) patients with PD. There was no difference in the risk of death or any postoperative complications during index hospitalization for these patients. However, PD patients had an increased risk of hospital readmission (odds ratio [OR] = 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.26) and postoperative dislocation (OR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.58-2.80) within 90 days of surgery. PD patients also had an increased risk of revision surgery for instability (OR = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.48-3.28), despite no difference in the risk of any revision surgery, revision surgery for fracture, or revision surgery for infection. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective cohort study, PD patients who underwent a HA for FNF had a greater risk of postoperative dislocation and revision surgery for instability within 90 days. These findings are not only important to consider when managing these at-risk patients but also stress the need to allocate operative and postoperative resources to prevent and treat instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 (Retrospective cohort study).