Feasibility and safety report on robotic assistance for cervical pedicle screw fixation: a cadaveric study.

This cadaveric study aimed to evaluate the safety and usability of a novel robotic system for posterior cervical pedicle screw fixation. Three human cadaveric specimens and C2-T3 were included. Freshly frozen human cadaver specimens were prepared and subjected to robot-assisted posterior cervical pedicle screw fixation using the robotic system. The accuracy of screw placement, breach rate, and critical structure violations were evaluated. The results were statistically compared with those of previous studies that used different robotic systems for cervical pedicle screw fixation. The robotic system demonstrated a high accuracy rate in screw placement. A significant number of screws were placed within predetermined safe zones. The total entry offset was 1.08 ± 0.83 mm, the target offset was 1.86 ± 0.50 mm, and the angle offset was 2.14 ± 0.77°. Accuracy rates comparable with those of previous studies using different robotic systems were achieved. The system was also feasible, allowing precise navigation and real-time feedback during the procedure. This cadaveric study validated the safety and usability of the novel robotic system for posterior cervical pedicle screw fixation. The system exhibited high precision in screw placement, and the results support the extension of the indications for robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation from the lumbar spine to the cervical spine.

Enhancing spinal bone anchor pull-out resistance with an L-shaped anchor.

The success rate of spinal fusion surgery is mainly determined by the fixation strength of the spinal bone anchors. This study explores the use of an L-shaped spinal bone anchor that is intended to establish a macro-shape lock with the posterior cortical layer of the vertebral body, thereby increasing the pull-out resistance of the anchor. The performance of this L-shaped anchor was evaluated in lumbar vertebra phantoms (L1-L5) across four distinct perpendicular orientations (lateral, medial, superior, and inferior). During the pull-out experiments, the pull-out force, and the displacement of the anchor with respect to the vertebra was measured which allowed the determination of the maximal pull-out force (mean: 123 N ± 25 N) and the initial pull-out force, the initial force required to start motion of the anchor (mean: 23 N ± 16 N). Notably, the maximum pull-out force was observed when the anchor engaged the cortical bone layer. The results demonstrate the potential benefits of utilising a spinal bone anchor featuring a macro-shape lock with the cortical bone layer to increase the pull-out force. Combining the macro shape-lock fixation method with the conventional pedicle screw shows the potential to significantly enhance the fixation strength of spinal bone anchors.

Comparison of No Tap (two-step) and tapping robotic assisted cortical bone trajectory screw insertion.

Workflow for cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws includes tapping line-to-line or under tapping by 1 mm. We describe a non-tapping, two-step workflow for CBT screw placement, and compare the safety profile and time savings to the Tap (three-step) workflow. Patients undergoing robotic assisted 1-3 level posterior fusion with CBT screws for degenerative conditions were identified and separated into either a No-Tap or Tap workflow. Number of total screws, screw-related complications, estimated blood loss, operative time, robotic time, and return to the operating room were collected and analyzed. There were 91 cases (458 screws) in the No-Tap and 88 cases (466 screws) in the Tap groups, with no difference in demographics, revision status, ASA grade, approach, number of levels fused or diagnosis between cohorts. Total robotic time was lower in the No-Tap (26.7 min) versus the Tap group (30.3 min, p = 0.053). There was no difference in the number of malpositioned screws identified intraoperatively (10 vs 6, p = 0.427), screws converted to freehand (3 vs 3, p = 0.699), or screws abandoned (3 vs 2, p = 1.000). No pedicle/pars fracture or fixation failure was seen in the No-Tap cohort and one in the Tap cohort (p = 1.00). No patients in either cohort were returned to OR for malpositioned screws. This study showed that the No-Tap screw insertion workflow for robot-assisted CBT reduces robotic time without increasing complications.

[Comparison of Clinical Effects of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screws and Traditional Pedicle Screws in Posterior Lumbar Fusion]. / è °æ¤ŽåŽè·¯èžåˆæœ¯ä¸­çš®è´¨éª¨è½¨è¿¹èžºé’‰å’Œä¼ ç»Ÿæ¤Žå¼“æ ¹èžºé’‰çš„ä¸´åºŠæ•ˆæžœæ¯”è¾ƒ.

Objective: To compare the clinical effects of cortical bone trajectory screws and traditional pedicle screws in posterior lumbar fusion. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to analyze lumbar degeneration patients who underwent surgical treatment at our hospital between January 2016 and January 2019. A total of 123 patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. The subjects were divided into two groups according to their surgical procedures and the members of the two groups were matched by age, sex, and the number of fusion segments. There were 63 patients in the traditional pedicle screws (PS) group and 60 in the cortical bone trajectory screws (CBTS) group. The outcomes of the two groups were compared. The primary outcome measures were perioperative conditions, including operation duration, estimated intraoperative blood loss (EBL), and length-of-stay (LOS), visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, and interbody fusion rate. The secondary outcome measures were the time to postoperative ambulation and the incidence of complications. VAS scores and ODI scores were assessed before operation, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 12 months after operation, and at the final follow-up. The interbody fusion rate was assessed in 1 year and 2 years after the operation and at the final follow-up. Results: The CBTS group showed a reduction in operation duration ([142.8±13.1] min vs. [174.7±15.4] min, P<0.001), LOS ([9.5±1.5] d vs. [12.0±2.0] d, P<0.001), and EBL ([194.2±38.3] mL vs. [377.5±33.1] mL, P<0.001) in comparison with the PS group. The VAS score for back pain in the CBTS group was lower than that in the PS group at 1 week and 1 month after operation and the ODI score in the CBTS group was lower than that in the PS group at 1 month after operation, with the differences being statistically significant (P<0.05). At each postoperative time point, the VAS score for leg pain and the interbody fusion rate did not show significant difference between the two groups. The VAS score for back and leg pain and the ODI score at each time point after operation in both the CBTS group and the PS group were significantly lower than those before operation (P<0.05). No significant difference was found in the time to postoperative ambulation or the overall complication incidence between the two groups. Conclusion: The CBTS technique could significantly shorten the operation duration and LOS, reduce EBL, and achieve the same effect as the PS technique does in terms of intervertebral fusion rate, pain relief, functional improvement, and complication incidence in patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion.

A novel guide device for pedicle screw insertion using three-dimensional preoperative planning in open lumbar spinal surgery: a comparative retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: Pedicle screw stabilization (PSS) surgeries for spinal instability are still the most effective treatment approach. The use of preoperative planning can minimize the complications related to transpedicular screw (TPS) misplacement. The study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of a guide device developed to improve the accuracy of the free-hand technique using three-dimensional planning in PSS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with degenerative spinal diseases who underwent open PSS between 2019 and 2022 were evaluated retrospectively. FG group included patients who were operated on using the fluoroscopy alone with preoperative two-dimensional planning. AFG group included patients who were operated on using a guide advice-assisted technique with preoperative 3DP. Between-group comparisons were performed. RESULTS: A total of 143 patients with a mean age of 59.6 years were included in the study. 71 patients were assessed in the FG group and 72 patients in the AFG group. Between-group comparisons regarding demographics, etiologies, radiation exposure, and functional improvements showed no significant differences (p > 0.05). Although the accuracy of TPSs positioning was 94.2% and 96.5% in the 2DG and 3DG, the difference between the groups was not statistically significant. The statistically significant differences regarding the upper-level facet joint violation and pedicle breach rates were lower in the AFG group (p < 0.0001; X2 = 19.57) and (p < 0.0001; X2 = 25.3), respectively. CONCLUSION: Using a guide device associated with preoperative 3PD reduced the upper-level facet joint violation and pedicle breach rates in open PSS surgeries performed by free-hand technique for degenerative spinal diseases.

Ultrasonic bone curette-assisted unilateral approach for bilateral decompression with MIS-TLIF for severe lumbar spinal stenosis.

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of bilateral decompression with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) assisted by an ultrasonic bone curette (UBC) for treating severe degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) and traditional tool laminectomy decompression MIS-TLIF for treating severe DLSS. METHODS: The clinical data of 128 patients with single-segment severe DLSS who were admitted between January 2017 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 67 patients were treated with unilateral fenestration and bilateral decompression MIS-TLIF using an ultrasonic bone curette (UBC group), whereas 61 patients were treated with unilateral fenestration and bilateral decompression MIS-TLIF using traditional tools (traditional group, control). A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate back and lower limb pain before the operation,immediate postoperative, and one week, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after the operation. Oswestry disability index (ODI) and Zurich claudication score (ZCQ) were employed to evaluate the improvement in low back and lower limb function. At the last follow-up, the Bridwell bone graft fusion standard was utilized to evaluate bone graft fusion. RESULTS: The decompression time of laminectomy was significantly shorter in the UBC group than in the traditional group (control group), and the intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume were significantly less in those in the control group (P < 0.05). The VAS, ODI, and ZCQ scores of the two groups after the operation were significantly improved compared to those before the operation (P < 0.05). The UBC group had better VAS back scores than the control group immediate postoperative and one week after the operation(P < 0.05). The UBC group had better VAS lower limb scores than the control group immediate postoperative (P < 0.05).The incidence of perioperative complications, hospitalization time, dural sac cross-sectional area (CSA), and dural sac CSA improvement rate did not differ significantly between the two groups (P > 0.05). VAS and ODI scores did not differ significantly between the two groups before,three, six months, one year, and two years after surgery (P > 0.05). The ZCQ scores did not differ significantly between the two groups before the operation at one week, six months, one year, and two years after the operation (P > 0.05). According to the Bridwell bone graft fusion standard, bone graft fusion did not occur significantly between the two groups (P > 0.05) at the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: UBC unilateral fenestration bilateral decompression MIS-TLIF in treating severe DLSS can achieve clinical efficacy as traditional tool unilateral fenestration bilateral decompression MIS-TLIF and reduce intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage. It can also shorten the operation time, effectively reduce the work intensity of the operator, and reduce the degree of low back pain during short-term follow-ups. Therefore, this is a safe and effective surgical method.

S2 alar-iliac screws are superior to traditional iliac screws for spinopelvic fixation in adult spinal deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Spinopelvic fixation (SPF) using traditional iliac screws has provided biomechanical advantages compared to previous constructs, but common complications include screw prominence and wound complications. The newer S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screw may provide a lower profile option with lower rates of complications and revisions for adult spinal deformity (ASD). The purpose of this study was to compare rates of complications and revision following SPF between S2AI and traditional iliac screws in patients with ASD. METHODS: A PRISMA-compliant systematic literature review was conducted using Cochrane, Embase, and PubMed. Included studies reported primary data on adult patients undergoing S2AI screw fixation or traditional IS fixation for ASD. Primary outcomes of interest were rates of revision and complications, which included screw failure (fracture and loosening), symptomatic screw prominence, wound complications (dehiscence and infection), and L5-S1 pseudarthrosis. RESULTS: Fifteen retrospective studies with a total of 1502 patients (iliac screws: 889 [59.2%]; S2AI screws: 613 [40.8%]) were included. Pooled analysis indicated that iliac screws had significantly higher odds of revision (17.1% vs 9.1%, OR = 2.45 [1.25-4.77]), symptomatic screw prominence (9.9% vs 2.2%, OR = 6.26 [2.75-14.27]), and wound complications (20.1% vs 4.4%, OR = 5.94 [1.55-22.79]). S2AI screws also led to a larger preoperative to postoperative decrease in pain (SMD = - 0.26, 95% CI = -0.50, - 0.011). CONCLUSION: The findings from this review demonstrate higher rates of revision, symptomatic screw prominence, and wound complications with traditional iliac screws. Current data supports the use of S2AI screws specifically for ASD. PROSPERO ID: CRD42022336515. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Using Proximal Hooks as a Soft-Landing Strategy to Prevent Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in the Surgical Treatment of Scheuermann's Kyphosis.

AIM: To evaluate the occurrence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) as well as both the clinical and radiologic outcomes of patients who underwent surgery for Scheuermann?s Kyphosis (SK) using either exclusively pedicle screws or a combination of proximal hooks and pedicle screws constructs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Surgically treated 37 patients with the diagnosis of SK were evaluated retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups based on the type of instrumentation employed. The first group contained 22 patients with only pedicle screws (PP) while the second group consisted of 15 patients with mixed constructs that were proximal hooks and pedicle screws (HP) at the rest of the levels. The clinical and radiological data were compared in patients who were followed up for a minimum of 2 years. RESULTS: The average duration of follow-up for the PP group was approximately 94.7 ± 53.1 months, whereas the HP group had an average follow-up period of around 103 ± 64.4 months. After conducting the analyses, no statistically significant findings were identified in the measurements taken for the SRS-22 scores in preoperative, postoperative, and the most recent follow-up radiographs (p > 0.05). It is worth noting that among patients who exclusively utilized pedicle screws, both the proximal (p=0.045) and distal (p=0.030) junctional kyphosis angles experienced more pronounced increases compared to hybrid structures. CONCLUSION: While no notable distinction was observed between the two groups, patients with pedicle screws fixation had a higher PJK angle. Conversely, the use of hooks at the upper end seems to be a preventive measure against the development of PJK.

Reduced Bone Density Based on Hounsfield Units After Long-Segment Spinal Fusion with Harrington Rods.

BACKGROUND: Long-segment instrumentation, such as Harrington rods, offloads vertebrae within the construct, which may result in significant stress shielding of the fused segments. The present study aimed to determine the effects of spinal fusion on bone density by measuring Hounsfield units (HUs) throughout the spine in patients with a history of Harrington rod fusion. METHODS: Patients with a history of Harrington rod fusion treated at a single academic institution were identified. Mean HUs were calculated at 5 spinal segments for each patient: cranial adjacent mobile segment, cranial fused segment, midconstruct fused segment, caudal fused segment, and caudal adjacent mobile segment. Mean HUs for each level were compared using a paired-sample t test, with statistical significance defined by P < 0.05. Hierarchic multiple regression, including age, gender, body mass index, and time since original fusion, was used to determine predictors of midfused segment HUs. RESULTS: One hundred patients were included (mean age, 55 ± 12 years; 62% female). Mean HUs for the midconstruct fused segment (110; 95% confidence interval [CI], 100-121) were significantly lower than both the cranial and caudal fused segments (150 and 118, respectively; both P < 0.05), as well as both the cranial and caudal adjacent mobile segments (210 and 130, respectively; both P < 0.001). Multivariable regression showed midconstruct HUs were predicted only by patient age (-2.6 HU/year; 95% CI, -3.4 to -1.9; P < 0.001) and time since original surgery (-1.4 HU/year; 95% CI, -2.6 to -0.2; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: HUs were significantly decreased in the middle of previous long-segment fusion constructs, suggesting that multilevel fusion constructs lead to vertebral bone density loss within the construct, potentially from stress shielding.

The potential of proximal junctional kyphosis prevention using a novel tether pedicle screw construct: an in silico study comparing the influence of standard and dynamic techniques on adjacent-level range of motion and load pattern.

OBJECTIVE: A tether pedicle screw (TPS) enables individual stepless pretensioning and is placed at one or two levels above the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV+1 and UIV+2, respectively). This study aimed to evaluate a novel customized TPS for the prevention of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and to investigate the potential to generate a smoother force transition from cranial to long fusion during trunk flexion, instead of an abrupt change at the UIV, following adult spinal deformity surgery. METHODS: A finite element model was designed based on an adult patient with spinal deformity instrumented from T10 to S1. Five different sagittal balance types and implant configurations were tested. The proximal range of motion (ROM) and intervertebral stress were examined, with a special focus on their respective discontinuities. RESULTS: Tension shielding at UIV/UIV+1 by the TPS was consistent irrespective of sagittal profiles. The use of TPSs at UIV+1 and UIV+2 increased the efficacy in reducing spinal ROM discontinuity at UIV/UIV+1, as compared with the use of TPSs at UIV+1 only. Through the use of two pairs of TPSs cranial to the UIV, the optimal tension configuration could be defined to avoid a reduction effect at UIV+1. Neither the addition of transition rods to the TPSs nor the use of transition rods in combination with standard pedicle screws improved the junctional mechanics when compared with TPSs at UIV+1/UIV+2. CONCLUSIONS: A smoother motion discontinuity at the UIV can be achieved via implementation of a TPS strategy. This new technology shows favorable in silico mechanics for reducing the risk of PJK.

Pedicle screw accuracy placed with assistance of machine vision technology in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis.

INTRODUCTION: Pedicle screws are the primary method of vertebral fixation in scoliosis surgery, but there are lingering concerns over potential malposition. The rates of pedicle screw malposition in pediatric spine surgery vary from 10% to 21%. Malpositioned screws can lead to potentially catastrophic neurological, vascular, and visceral complications. Pedicle screw positioning in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis is challenging due to a combination of large curves, complex pelvic anatomy, and osteopenia. This study aimed to determine the rate of pedicle screw malposition, associated complications, and subsequent revision from screws placed with the assistance of machine vision navigation technology in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis undergoing posterior instrumentation and fusion. METHOD: A retrospective analysis of the records of patients with neuromuscular scoliosis who underwent thoracolumbar pedicle screw insertion with the assistance of machine-vision image guidance navigation was performed. Screws were inserted by either a staff surgeon, orthopaedic fellow, or orthopaedic resident. Post-operative ultra-low dose CT scans were used to assess pedicle screw accuracy. The Gertzbein classification was used to grade any pedicle breaches (grade 0, no breach; grade 1, <2 mm; grade 2, 2-4 mm; grade 3, >4 mm). A screw was deemed accurate if no breach was identified (grade 0). RESULTS: 25 patients were included in the analysis, with a mean age of 13.6 years (range 11 to 18 years; 13/25 (52.0%) were female. The average pre-operative supine Cobb angle was 90.0 degrees (48-120 degrees). A total of 687 screws from 25 patients were analyzed (402 thoracic, 241 lumbosacral, 44 S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screws). Surgical trainees (fellows and orthopaedic residents) inserted 46.6% (320/687) of screws with 98.8% (4/320) accuracy. The overall accuracy of pedicle screw insertion was 98.0% (Grade 0, no breach). All 13 breaches that occurred in the thoracic and lumbar screws were Grade 1. Of the 44 S2AI screws placed, one screw had a Grade 3 breach (2.3%) noted on intra-operative radiographs following rod placement and correction. This screw was subsequently revised. None of the breaches resulted in neuromonitoring changes, vessel, or visceral injuries. CONCLUSION: Machine vision navigation technology combined with careful free-hand pedicle screw insertion techniques demonstrated high levels of pedicle screw insertion accuracy, even in patients with challenging anatomy.

Navigated Simultaneous Lateral Minimally Invasive Tubular and Posterior Mini-Open Access for Removal and Revision of Triangular Sacroiliac Joint Implants: A Technical Note.

BACKGROUND: Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusion, to treat back pain caused by SIJ dysfunction, can employ open or minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques and either cylindrical (screw-shaped) or triangular (wedge-shaped) implants. Fusion nonunion sometimes explains recurrent SIJ pain following fusion and occasionally requires hardware revision. MIS revision minimizes patient pain, infection, and disability, but due to the triangular implant size and form factor, implant removal can present challenges for MIS access during the explantation and achieving good bony purchase for reinstrumentation. Here, we report a prone single-position lateral MIS/posterior mini-open procedure for triangular-implant SIJ fusion revision. METHODS: The patient is a 72-year-old female who underwent right SIJ fusion for lower back and leg pain sustained after a fall 2 years prior but experienced recurrent pain over the subsequent 2 years, with imaging findings of right SIJ peri-hardware lucencies and diagnostic injections confirming persistent right-sided sacroiliitis. RESULTS: The patient underwent hardware removal using the lateral MIS incision with table-mounted tubular access and image-guided navigation to maintain exposure, plus simultaneous reinstrumentation using a navigated S2-alar-iliac screw and iliac bolt construct with connecting rod through the posterior mini-open incision made for the navigation reference frame spinous process clamp. CONCLUSIONS: The use of navigation and MIS access can significantly decrease the complexity of lateral hardware removal, and mini-open navigated screw-and-rod constructs offer reinstrumentation options accessible to surgeons unfamiliar with specialized posterior SIJ systems.

Two-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Performed Using a Three-Dimensional Exoscope.

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common neurosurgical procedure. Portions of the procedure, such as the discectomy, foraminotomy, graft placement, and plate placement, are often performed using operating microscopes to maximize visualization and minimize neurovascular injury. Although standard operating microscopes offer superb visualization, they lack ergonomic and educational utility. With modern advancements in digital imaging and stereopsis, there has been a surge of interest in evaluating modern exoscopes for their utility in cranial and spinal neurosurgery.1-3 In Video 1, we demonstrate the use of a commercial three-dimensional exoscope from skin incision through completion of a two-level ACDF. Both the lead surgeon and the assistant surgeon were able to maintain a neutral, ergonomic, and comfortable position throughout the surgery. Furthermore, we tested the utility of this technique in 15 patients undergoing ACDF (2 one-level, 9 two-level, 3 three-level, and 1 four-level). Mean (SD) overall operative time was 118 (34) minutes (2-level ACDF, 110 [12] minutes), and mean (SD) blood loss was 23 (8.0) mL. The Neck Disability Index score and visual analog scale score for neck pain improved significantly at 6 weeks postoperatively (from 59.6 [1.3] to 27.9 [3.0] and from 6.3 [1.0] to 2.5 [0.92], respectively; P < 0.001 for both). Thus, excellent clinical outcomes can be achieved using three-dimensional exoscopes with comparable operative time and blood loss compared with conventional surgical microscopes or loupes. Given the improved ergonomic and teaching potential of exoscopes, the use of three-dimensional exoscopes for neurosurgical and spine surgeries warrants further investigation.

Patient-specific rods in adult spinal deformity: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of patient-specific rods for adult spinal deformity. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed through an electronic search of the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Human studies between 2012 and 2023 were included. Sample size, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), pelvic tilt (PT), operation time, blood loss, follow-up duration, and complications were recorded for each study when available. RESULTS: Seven studies with a total of 304 adult spinal deformity patients of various etiologies were included. All studies reported SVA, and PT; two studies did not report PI-LL. Four studies reported planned radiographic outcomes. Two found a significant association between preoperative plan and postoperative outcome in all three outcomes. One found a significant association for PI-LL alone. The fourth found no significant associations. SVA improved in six of seven studies, PI-LL improved in all five, and three of seven studies found improved postoperative PT. Significance of these results varied greatly by study. CONCLUSION: Preliminary evidence suggests potential benefits of PSRs in achieving optimal spino-pelvic parameters in ASD surgery. Nevertheless, conclusions regarding the superiority of PSRs over traditional rods must be judiciously drawn, given the heterogeneity of patients and study methodologies, potential confounding variables, and the absence of robust randomized controlled trials. Future investigations should concentrate on enhancing preoperative planning, standardizing surgical methodologies, isolating specific patient subgroups, and head-to-head comparisons with traditional rods to fully elucidate the impact of PSRs in ASD surgery.

Ex vivo comparison of pin placement with patient-specific drill guides or freehand technique in canine cadaveric spines.

OBJECTIVE: To compare vertebral implant placement in the canine thoracolumbar spine between 3D-printed patient-specific drill guides (3DPG) and the conventional freehand technique (FH). STUDY DESIGN: Ex vivo study. ANIMALS: Cadaveric canine spines (n = 24). METHODS: Implant trajectories were established for the left and right sides of the T10 through L6 vertebrae based on computed tomography (CT) imaging. Customized drill guides were created for each vertebra of interest. Each cadaver was randomly assigned to one of six veterinarians with varying levels of experience placing vertebral implants. Vertebrae were randomly assigned a surgical order and technique (3DPG or FH) for both sides. Postoperative CT images were acquired. A single, blinded observer assessed pin placement using a modified Zdichavsky classification. RESULTS: A total of 480 implants were placed in 240 vertebrae. Three sites were excluded from the analysis; therefore, a total of 238 implants were evaluated using the FH technique and 239 implants using 3DPG. When evaluating implant placement, 152/239 (63.6%) of 3DPG implants were considered to have an acceptable placement in comparison with 115/248 (48.32%) with FH. Overall, pin placement using 3DPG was more likely to provide acceptable pin placement (p < .001) in comparison with the FH technique for surgeons at all levels of experience. CONCLUSION: The use of 3DPG was shown to be better than the conventional freehand technique regarding acceptable placement of implants in the thoracolumbar spine of canine cadavers. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Utilizing 3DPG can be considered better than the traditional FH technique when placing implants in the canine thoracolumbar spine.

Dynamic cord compression induced by proximal junctional failure and loose pedicle screws after thoracolumbar fusion surgery: a case report.

BACKGROUND: One of the common mechanical complications following spinal fusion surgery is proximal junctional failure (PJF). The incidence of neurological deficit associated with PJF has been poorly described in the literature. Here, we report a case in which numbness in the lower extremities was recognized as the first symptom, but the discrepancy in the imaging findings made PJF difficult to diagnose. METHODS: A 71-year-old female underwent corrective fusion surgery. Three weeks later, she complained of persistent right leg numbness. Standing X-ray showed the back-out of the pedicle screws (PSs) in the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV), but there was no obvious evidence of cord compression on computed tomography (CT), which caused the delay of diagnosis. Five weeks later, magnetic resonance image (MRI) did not show cord compression on an axial view, but there were signal changes in the spinal cord. RESULTS: The first reason for the delayed diagnosis was the lack of awareness that leg numbness could occur as the first symptom of PJF. The second problem was the lack of evidence for spinal cord compression in various imaging tests. Loosened PSs were dislocated on standing, but were back to their original position on supine position. In our case, these contradictory images led to a delay in diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Loosened PSs caused dynamic cord compression due to repeated deviation and reduction. Supine and standing radiographs may be an important tool in the diagnosis of PJF induced by dynamic cord compression.

Zero-profile anchored spacer versus conventional plate-cage construct in bilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Zero-profile anchored spacers (ZAS) and plate-cage constructs (PCC) are currently employed when performing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Nevertheless, the efficacy and safety of both devices in bilevel ACDF remain controversial. The goal of our meta-analysis is to assess the overall long-term efficacy and security among ZAS and PCC in bilevel ACDF. METHODS: A search of four electronic databases was conducted to identify researches that compared ZAS with PCC for bilevel ACDF. Stata MP 17.0 software was used for this meta-analysis. RESULTS: Nine researches with a total of 580 patients were involved. In comparison to PCC, ZAS significantly reduced intraoperative bleeding and postoperative dysphagia rates. No significant differences were found concerning operation time, JOA score, NDI score, cervical Cobb angle, fusion rates, the incidence of adjacent segmental degeneration (ASD) and implant sinking rates at last follow-up. CONCLUSION: Compared to PCC, ZAS achieved similar efficacy and security in bilevel ACDF with respect to operative time, JOA score, NDI score, cervical Cobb angle, fusion rates, implant sinking rates and ASD rates at final follow-up. It is worth noting that ZAS offered considerable benefits over conventional PCC for the reduction of intraoperative bleeding and postoperative dysphagia. Therefore, for patients requiring bilevel ACDF, ZAS seems superior to PCC. Given the limitations of our study, larger prospective randomised controlled trials are needed to establish reliable proof to consolidate our conclusions.

Complications associated with subaxial placement of pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws in the cervical spine (C2-T1): systematic review and meta-analysis comprising 4,165 patients and 16,669 screws.

Lateral mass screw (LMS) and cervical pedicle screw (CPS) fixation are among the most popular techniques for posterior fusion of the cervical spine. Early research prioritized the LMS approach as the trajectory resulted in fewer neurovascular complications; however, with the incorporation of navigation assistance, the CPS approach should be re-evaluated. Our objective was to report the findings of a meta-analysis focused on comparing the LMS and CPS techniques in terms of rate of various complications with inclusion of all levels from C2 to T1. We conducted a systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE databases with final inclusion criteria focused on identifying studies that reported outcomes and complications for either the CPS or LMS technique. These studies were then pooled, and statistical analyses were performed from the cumulative data. A total of 60 studies comprising 4165 participants and 16,669 screws placed within the C2-T1 levels were identified. Within these studies, the LMS group had a significantly increased odds for lateral mass fractures (odds ratio [OR] = 43.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.62-711.42), additional cervical surgeries (OR = 5.56, 95%CI = 2.95-10.48), and surgical site infections (SSI) (OR = 5.47, 95%CI = 1.65-18.16). No other significant differences between groups in terms of complications were identified. Within the subgroup analysis of navigation versus non-navigation-guided CPS placement, no significant differences were identified for individual complications, although collectively significantly fewer complications occurred with navigation (OR = 5.29, 95%CI = 2.03-13.78). The CPS group had significantly fewer lateral mass fractures, cervical revision surgeries, and SSIs. Furthermore, navigation-assisted CPS placement was associated with a significant reduction in complications overall.

Comparison of Long-Term Efficacy of MIS-TLIF Intraoperative Implants in Patients with Osteoporosis.

Osteoporosis and degenerative spinal disease are still an unsolvable surgical problem. It is still difficult to solve the complications related to postoperative osteoporosis, such as cage subsidence, displacement, and retraction. Expandable interbody cage is a recent innovation and an increasingly popular alternative to standard static cage. However, the clinical efficacy of MIS-TLIF combined with expandable cage for the treatment of osteoporosis has limited reports. The purpose of this paper was to analyze the efficacy of MIS-TLIF with expandable cage in patients with degenerative lumbar disease with osteoporosis. Patients with osteoporosis who received single-level MIS-TLIF and were followed up for at least 1 year were included. The outcome measures are as follows: clinical features, perioperative period, and neurological complications. JOA score and VAS pain score were used to analyze the improvement of patients' function. Imaging analysis included segmental lordosis (SL), lumbar lordosis (LL), intervertebral disc height (DH), and the ratio of cage height to preoperative DH (RCD). The final data analysis included 284 patients with osteoporosis. 178 patients used static cages, and 106 patients used expandable cages. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics, surgical indexes, and JOA and VAS scores between the two groups. There was no difference in SL or LL between static group and expandable group. There was no significant difference in preoperative DH between the two groups. The RCD in the expansion group was significantly lower than that in the static group. The intraoperative and postoperative sedimentation rate in the static group was significantly higher than that in the expandable group. The use of expandable cages in MIS-TLIF has shown good results for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases with osteoporosis. Through appropriate surgical techniques, the expandable cage can reduce the risk of cage sinking.

Posterior minimally invasive scoliosis surgery versus the standard posterior approach for the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an updated meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Surgical management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) can be performed using standard posterior spinal fusion (PSF) or with a posterior minimally invasive approach. Minimally invasive scoliosis surgery (MISS) has several theoretical advantages, such as less tissue dissection, less blood loss, and earlier recovery. However, the difference in safety and effectiveness between MISS and PSF still needs to be clarified. This updated meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of MISS and standard PSF for the management of AIS. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library without time restriction was performed to identify relevant studies. MISS and PSF were compared in terms of radiographic parameters, estimated blood loss (EBL), blood transfusion rate, operative time (ORT), length of hospital stay (LOS), overall Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) score, postoperative pain, and complication rate. RESULTS: A total of seven studies comprising 767 patients (329 MISS and 438 PSF) with AIS were included. MISS and PSF yielded comparable deformity correction at the last follow-up. There were no significant differences in the overall SRS-22 scores or complication rates between the groups. Nevertheless, greater restoration of thoracic kyphosis (WMD, 2.98; 95% CI 0.58 to 5.37, P = 0.015), less EBL (WMD, -218.76; 95% CI -256.41 to -181.11, P < 0.001), a lower blood transfusion rate (RR, 0.31; 95% CI 0.20 to 0.48, P < 0.001), a shorter LOS (WMD, -1.48; 95% CI -2.48 to -0.48, P = 0.004), less postoperative pain (WMD, 0.57; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.98, P = 0.006), and a longer ORT (WMD, 84.85; 95% CI 33.30 to 136.40, P = 0.001) were observed in the MISS group. CONCLUSION: Despite its inherent technical challenges, MISS is a feasible and effective alternative to standard PSF for AIS patients with moderate and flexible curves. MISS was associated with adequate deformity correction, better restoration of sagittal alignment, less EBL, fewer transfusions, shorter LOS, and better pain management compared to PSF. Further research is required to determine the detailed indications for the MISS procedure.