¿Cuál es el efecto en salud en las personas expuestas a gases lacrimógenos?: síntesis rápida de evidencia / What is the health effect on people exposed to tear gases?: rapid evidence synthesis

ANTECEDENTES Y OBJETIVO Desde el 18 de octubre de 2019, Chile se encuentra en una crisis social relacionada a demandas de la ciudadanía para mejorar la calidad de vida. Frente a esto es que Chile lleva más de 5 meses de manifestaciones y concentraciones masivas y en las cuales Carabineros de Chile ha utilizado gases lacrimógenos como medida de control de masas. En este contexto el Instituto Nacional de Derechos Humanos (INDH) ha solicitado al Ministerio de Salud, el desarrollo de una síntesis de evidencia con el objetivo de informar sobre los riesgos para la salud como consecuencia del uso de gases lacrimógenos, así informando a la toma de decisiones. METODOLOGÍA Se utilizaron estrategias de búsqueda en las bases de datos Health Systems Evidence, Epistemonikos, EMBASE, y PUBMED, con el objetivo de identificar revisiones sistemáticas que abordaran la pregunta formulada. Como las revisiones sistemáticas no siempre reportaron adecuadamente los resultados presentados, se extrajeron los datos de los estudios primarios contemplados en estas revisiones. Se incluyeron revisiones sistemáticas que evaluaran el efecto del gas CS o combinados de gas CS con otro tipo de sustancias sobre la salud de la población. Se excluyeron estudios que evaluaran los efectos de gases lacrimógenos diferentes a CS, como gas pimienta o cloroacetopheno. RESULTADOS -Los efectos en salud inmediatos reportados son la irritación de mucosas, a mediano y largo plazo son asma, disnea, estrés postraumático, depresión, alteración funcional, estado vegetativo y muerte como consecuencia de impactos de dispositivos lacrimógenos.

Direct head injury caused by a tear gas cartridge. Questions on safety: A case report from Iraq and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: Primary injuries from tear gas weapons include injuries to the visual and respiratory systems and skin. However, few studies have reported direct mechanical brain injuries from tear gas weapons. CASE REPORT: A 27-year-old male presented to the emergency department of a neurosurgery teaching hospital in Baghdad, Iraq, with a penetrating head injury of unknown source. DISCUSSION: Tear gas weapons are considered safe, but tear gas exposure causes severe complications. Traumatic brain injuries as a direct effect of tear gas bombs are rarely reported in the literature. Tear gas cartridge injuries should be managed in the same manner as any penetrating brain injury, with appropriate neuromonitoring. This monitoring is crucial for the detection and prevention of secondary brain insults. CONCLUSION: Emergency medicine specialists and neurosurgeons should be aware that tear gas weapons are not always safe, and they should anticipate chemical, thermal and mechanical side effects of tear gas weapons. The literature and our results suggest that these weapons should not be considered civil and harmless.

Baby Shampoo to Relieve the Discomfort of Tear Gas and Pepper Spray Exposure: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Oleoresin capsicum (OC) or pepper spray, and tear gas (CS) are used by police and the military and produce severe discomfort. Some have proposed that washing with baby shampoo helps reduce this discomfort. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled study to determine if baby shampoo is effective in reducing the severity and duration of these effects. Study subjects included volunteers undergoing OC or CS exposure as part of their police or military training. After standardized exposure to OC or CS all subjects were allowed to irrigate their eyes and skin ad lib with water. Those randomized to the intervention group were provided with baby shampoo for application to their head, neck, and face. Participants rated their subjective discomfort in two domains on a scale of 0-10 at 0, 3, 5, 10, and 15 minutes. We performed statistical analysis using a two-tailed Mann-Whitney Test. RESULTS: There were 58 participants. Of 40 subjects in the OC arm of the study, there were no significant differences in the ocular or respiratory discomfort at any of the time points between control (n=19) and intervention (n=21) groups. Of 18 subjects in the CS arm, there were no significant differences in the ocular or skin discomfort at any of the time points between control (n=8) and intervention (n=10) groups. CONCLUSION: Irrigation with water and baby shampoo provides no better relief from OC- or CS-induced discomfort than irrigation with water alone.

Rare and Severe Maxillofacial Injury Due to Tear Gas Capsules: Report of Three Cases.

Tear gases are used by police or armed forces for control of riots or social events or by the general population for private self-defense. These agents are used widely throughout the world, but some harmful effects have reported. In addition, despite well-defined chemical side effects documented in the literature, data are insufficient regarding mechanical injury due to tear gas capsules. We report three cases of severe maxillofacial injury in patients who had these capsules fired from tear gas guns directly to their faces. The capsules penetrated the patients' faces, causing potentially fatal injuries. To our knowledge, reports of this kind of injury related to tear gas capsules are very rare in the literature. In conclusion, tear gas guns may be very dangerous in terms of human health and they may cause severe injuries, especially when they are not used according to strict guidelines.

Exposición a gas CS: a propósito de un caso peculiar / Exposure to CS gas: Case study

El gas CS (o-clorobenzolideno malononitrilo) se incluye dentro del grupo de los gases lacrimógenos. La exposición a dicho gas ocurre durante su empleo como gas de defensa o antidisturbios, así como durante el entrenamiento rutinario de las fuerzas de choque especializadas. Su acción tóxica es ejercida a través de un efecto irritante sobre piel y mucosas, así como por mecanismos inmunoalérgicos. Presentamos el caso de un paciente de 24 años, perteneciente a una fuerza de choque, que consultó por lesiones cutáneas luego de una exposición a humo y dispersión de polvo de una granada de gas CS durante ejercicios de entrenamiento. Clínicamente se presentó características peculiares, referidas a sus manifestaciones cutáneas, localización y severidad de las mismas. Se analiza la etiopatogenia de las lesiones y los posibles mecanismos involucrados, diagnósticos diferenciales, así como los pilares del tratamiento frente a una exposición a gas CS...

Usos y abusos de los gases lacrimógenos y la salud: prevención y manejo / Uses and abuses of teargas and health: prevention and management

Los gases lacrimógenos (GL) son métodos de control de manifestaciones públicas por los órganos represivos, muy utilizados y efectivos globalmente. El objetivo de esta revisión es actualizar información técnica sobre los gases lacrimógenos, añadiendo aspectos más recientes legales, éticos, médicos y preventivos del uso y abuso de estos agentes químicos durante las acciones de las fuerzas policiales y represivas. Las fuentes de información secundarias seleccionadas son portales generales con el buscador Google, académicos (Google académico), PubMed y de las organizaciones gubernamentales y no gubernamentales, también se incluyen hemerotecas de artículos periodísticos sobre su uso desde 2000 hasta 2014. La exposición aguda a (GL) se expresa con manifestaciones clínicas de afección respiratoria, irritación de los ojos y de la piel, requiriendo en la mayoría de los casos medidas generales de atención fuera del hospital. Sin embargo, en casos de personas con co-morbilidades respiratorias, alérgicas, glaucoma y del corazón, acarrean mayores consecuencias que requieren atención médica y hospitalaria. Se han reportado fatalidades relacionadas al uso y abuso de los agentes químicos. Desde el punto de vista de salud pública existe controversia sobre su uso, y definitivamente causan consternación en los afectados y los abusos de su utilización en manifestaciones pacíficas. Se hace un listado de recomendaciones ante exposiciones durante manifestaciones, como prevenir intoxicaciones severas y dar los primeros auxilios...

Tear gases (TG) are methods for public control used by police forces. The objective of this review is to update technical information about tear gas, adding more recent legal, ethical, medical and preventive aspects of the use and abuse of these chemicals during the actions of the police and repressive forces. Selected secondary sources of information are Google, Academic Google, PubMed and of governmental and non-governmental organizations, also included are newspaper archives about its use from 2000 to 2014. Acute exposure to (GL) is expressed with clinical manifestations of respiratory conditions, irritation of the eyes and skin, requiring in most cases general ambulatory measures of care. However, in persons with respiratory, allergic, glaucoma and heart comorbidities, they carry greater consequences requiring hospital care. Fatalities have been reported related to the use and abuse of chemical agents. From the viewpoint of public health there is a controversy about its use, and definitely cause consternation in the affected in peaceful demonstrations. A list of recommendations is made about how to prevent severe intoxications and give first aid...

Accidental tear gas injuries in security agents.

BACKGROUND: Tear gas is a noxious vapour used in quelling civil disturbances. The law enforcement agents who usually handle this are well trained and rarely injured by the use of this weapon especially during peace times. METHODS: We report injuries sustained by two policemen handling tear gas as a result of accidents. Case notes of the patients were the source of information. RESULTS: Two policemen were injured while handling tear gas. The equipment accidentally dropped and exploded on attempting to pick them. The mechanisms of injuries and parts of the body injured were similar ie the hands and face with traumatic cataract of an eye in one patient. CONCLUSION: We conclude that proper training of the law enforcement agents will go a long way in reducing these types of morbidity from tear gas use.

Head injury caused by tear gas cartridge in teenage population.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the head injury in children caused by an unusual projectile, a tear gas cartridge. The study is the only one on this subject which has been done in a teenage population. METHOD: This was a prospective study conducted over a period of 4 years in which all the patients aged less than or equal to 18 years and who had a head injury due to a tear gas cartridge were included. RESULTS: We had 5 patients in our study group. All the patients were males. Commonest CT scan finding was brain contusion with skull fracture. One of our patients died. One patient continues to be in vegetative state whereas 3 had a good outcome. CONCLUSION: Tear gas cartridge, though considered as one of the benign modalities of controlling agitated crowds, is not really benign. It can cause serious injuries and mortality. The personnel using them might be trained in a better way so that the people do not receive direct hits. In addition some changes in the design of tear gas cartridge can be done to decrease the impact to the skull.

Medical hazards of the tear gas CS. A case of persistent, multisystem, hypersensitivity reaction and review of the literature.

A 30-year-old incarcerated man was sprayed with the "tear gas" ortho-chlorobenzylidene malononitrile (CS). He was hospitalized 8 days later with erythroderma, wheezing, pneumonitis with hypoxemia, hepatitis with jaundice, and hypereosinophilia. During the subsequent months he continued to suffer from generalized dermatitis, recurrent cough and wheezing consistent with reactive airways dysfunction syndrome, and eosinophilia. These abnormalities responded to brief courses of systemic corticosteroid but recurred off therapy. The dermatitis resolved gradually over 6-7 months, but the patient still had asthma-like symptoms a year following exposure. Patch testing confirmed sensitization to CS. The mechanism of the patient's prolonged reaction is unknown but may involve cell-mediated hypersensitivity, perhaps to adducts of CS (or a metabolite) and tissue proteins. This is the first documented case in which CS apparently caused a severe, multisystem illness by hypersensitivity rather than direct tissue toxicity. Both the ethics and safety of CS use remain controversial, in part because of the difficulty documenting sporadic injuries received in the field, and also because the charged circumstances surrounding CS use may lead to both underreporting and exaggerated claims of medical harm. The medical literature on CS focuses mainly on its immediate irritant effects and on transient dermal and ocular injuries, with only 2 prior case reports of acute lung injury related to CS exposure. Given the paucity of documented lasting effects despite its widespread use for more than 3 decades, CS appears to be safe when deployed (outdoors) in a controlled manner, but it can cause important injuries if misused or if applied to a sensitized individual.

[Occupational asthma in a teacher after repeated exposure to tear gas]. / Asthme professionnel chez une enseignante après inhalation répétée de gaz lacrymogènes.

Acute exposure to tear gas causes generally reversible cutaneous and mucosal irritations. Lasting respiratory manifestations after exposure are exceptional. We report the case of a 26-year-old female teacher with no history of respiratory disease who developed asthma after repeated exposure to tear gas discharged in her class room. The disorders occurring during these repeated exposures to the irritating gas were consistent with the recently described low level reactive airway dysfunction syndrome (low level RADS).

Occupational contact dermatitis due to 2-chloracetophenone tear gas.

2-Chloracetophenone (CN) is widely used as tear gas by police and civilians for self-defence. It may affect the eyes, respiratory system and skin, sometimes causing serious injuries. Both irritative and allergic contact dermatitis have been described. We report three police officers who experienced accidental escape of CN from their professional tear gas canisters. All of them showed localized dermatitis at the site of contact to CN, while widespread lesions appeared after 4 days in one case. Patch tests with the original involved tear gas dissolved in acetone (at 0.1-0.0001%) indicated an allergic reaction in two patients and an irritative reaction in the third. Occupational contact dermatitis due to CN seems to occur among police officers more often than is generally known. Infrequently, extensive health problems may be caused by CN when lesions spread over the integument. Therefore, an improvement of safety measures in occupational CN gas use is needed, especially aiming at avoidance of accidental leakage of canisters.