Sex differences impact ergonomic endoscopic training for gastroenterology fellows.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic-related injuries (ERIs) for gastroenterologists are common and can impact longevity of an endoscopic career. This study examines sex differences in the prevalence of ERIs and ergonomic training during gastroenterology fellowship. METHODS: A 56-item anonymous survey was sent to 709 general and advanced endoscopy gastroenterology fellows at 73 U.S. training programs between May and June 2022. Demographic information was collected along with questions related to endoscopic environment, ergonomic instruction, technique, equipment availability, and ergonomic knowledge. Responses of female and male gastroenterology fellows were compared using χ2 and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: Of the 236 respondents (response rate, 33.9%), 113 (44.5%) were women and 123 (52.1%) were men. Female fellows reported on average smaller hand sizes and shorter heights. More female fellows reported endoscopic equipment was not ergonomically optimized for their use. Additionally, more female fellows voiced preference for same-gender teachers and access to dial extenders and well-fitting lead aprons. High rates of postendoscopy pain were reported by both sexes, with significantly more women experiencing neck and shoulder pain. Trainees of both sexes demonstrated poor ergonomic awareness with an average score of 68% on a 5-point knowledge-based assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Physical differences exist between male and female trainees, and current endoscopic equipment may not be optimized for smaller hand sizes. This study highlights the urgent need for formal ergonomic training for trainees and trainers with consideration of stature and hand size to enhance safety, comfort, and equity in the training and practice of endoscopy.

Visual gaze patterns in trainee endoscopists - a novel assessment tool.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy proficiency is significantly influenced by skills achieved during training. Although assessment scores exist, they do not evaluate the impact of visual search strategies and their use is time and labour intensive. Eye-tracking has shown significant differences in visual gaze patterns (VGPs) between expert endoscopists with varying polyp detection rates, so may provide a means of automated assessment and guidance for trainees. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of eye-tracking as a novel assessment method for trainee endoscopists. METHODS: Eye-tracking glasses were used to record 26 colonoscopies from 12 endoscopy trainees who were assessed with directly observed procedural scores (DOPS), devised by the Joint Advisory Group (JAG) on GI endoscopy, and a visual analogue score of overall competence. A 'total weighted procedure score' (TWPS) was calculated from 1 to 20. Primary outcomes of fixation duration (FixD) and fixation frequency (FixF) were analysed according to areas of interest (AOIs) with the bowel surface and lumen represented by three concentric rings. Correlation was assessed using Pearson's coefficient. Significance was set at p<.050. RESULTS: Trainees displayed a significant positive correlation between TWPS and FixD (R = 0.943, p<.0001) and FixF (R = 0.936, p<.0001) in the anatomical bowel mucosa peripheries. Conversely, they had significant negative correlations between TWPS and the anatomical bowel lumen (FixD: R= -0.546, p=.004; FixF: R= -0.568, p=.002). CONCLUSIONS: Higher objective performance scores were associated with VGPs focussing on bowel mucosa. This is consistent with prior analysis showing peripheral VGPs correspond with higher polyp detection rates. Analysis of VGPs, therefore, has potential for training and assessment in colonoscopy.

Identifying IBD Providers' Knowledge Gaps Using a Prospective Web-based Survey.

BACKGROUND: As treatments, management strategies, and the role of advanced practice providers (APPs) have evolved in recent years, the Crohn's & Colitis Foundation sought to understand the educational and resource needs of clinicians caring for patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). The aim of this study was to describe the self-identified IBD knowledge and resource gaps of clinicians to inform the development of future programming. METHODS: A survey containing 19 questions created by the foundation's Professional Education Committee, a subset of its National Scientific Advisory Committee, was conducted from September 7, 2018 to October 15, 2018. Responses were included from providers if they were currently seeing any IBD patients in a clinical setting. The foundation distributed the survey by email and various social media channels to encourage a diverse response. The survey included questions on comfort levels around diagnosis, treatment, and management of patients with IBD, in addition to preferences and utilization of educational resources. The × 2 test was used to evaluate significant differences among respondents in the various domains surveyed. RESULTS: There were 197 eligible responses, of which 75% were from MD/Dos, followed by 25% APN/PA/RN/MSN/PhD/other; and 70% of respondents provide care for adult patients. The amount of time in practice was divided evenly among respondents. Fifty-seven percent of respondents practice in an academic/university setting, and approximately 75% indicated that ≥21% of their practice consisted of patients with IBD. Forty-four percent and 46% of respondents reported access to IBD based mental health providers and social workers in their practice, respectively. Seventy-two percent reported access to radiologists, 69% had access to dietitians, and 62% had access to advance practice providers. The areas of greatest educational need were prescribing medical cannabis (if approved locally) for pain management (62%); caring for patients with prior malignancy (35%); caring for pregnant patients and family planning (33%); caring for elderly patients (30%); and therapy decisions, including use of JAK inhibitors (29%), drug holidays (25%), and use of biosimilars (24%). More than 50% of respondents stated they do not participate in shared decision-making, citing time as the most common limiting factor. The majority of providers cited live education as their preferred learning format, and they wish to earn continuing medical education (CME) hours. CONCLUSION: This survey helped identify current IBD educational needs in our professional community. With a rapidly changing treatment landscape and an increase in the diversity of providers delivering care, additional opportunities to keep abreast of practice changes are critical to providing comprehensive, quality care in IBD. Our survey demonstrated that shared decision-making is underutilized in practice due to a need for resources that aid in its efficient integration into practice. Based on our results, a focus on creating live learning opportunities that offer CME are needed in the areas of therapeutic decision-making and treating IBD in special subsets (eg, prior malignancy, pregnancy, elderly).

Learning Effect of Diagnosing Depth of Invasion Using Non-Extension Sign in Early Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Determining the depth of invasion is important when considering therapeutic strategies for early gastric cancer (EGC). We determined the effects of learning the non-extension sign, that is, an index of T1b2 in EGC, on identifying its depth of invasion. METHODS: Endoscopic images of 40 EGC cases (20 showing positive non-extension sign on endoscopy as T1b2 and 20 showing negative non-extension sign on endoscopy as T1a-T1b1) were randomly displayed on PowerPoint. Participants read endoscopy findings (pretest) and attended a 60-min lecture on how to read the non-extension sign. Then, they read the same images using the non-extension sign as the marker (posttest). The primary endpoint was a change in accuracy rate for determining the depth of invasion before and after attending the lecture, for nonexperts (< 80%). RESULTS: Among 35 endoscopists, 12 were nonexperts; their test results were used for analyses. Accuracy rates for pretest and posttest among nonexperts were 75.2 and 82.5%, respectively, showing a significant increase in the accuracy rate after learning to read the non-extension sign (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Nonexperts' diagnostic ability to determine the depth of invasion of EGC improved by learning to read the non-extension sign. Thus, the non-extension sign is considered a simple and useful diagnostic marker.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal motility disorders.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal motility disorders which include achalasia, esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJ outflow obstruction), jackhammer esophagus (JE), distal esophageal spasm (DES), etc. are rare disease of unknown causes. The diagnosis is based on endoscopy, barium meal, and high-resolution manometry (HRM). With the development of endoscopy, peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has emerged as a standard method for the treatment of achalasia. PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to enable gastroenterologists to have a more comprehensive understanding of the application status, technical characteristics, clinical efficacy and future prospect of POEM in the treatment of esophageal motility disorders. METHODS: Through a large number of reading literature, combined with clinical practice, summary and analysis of the indications, procedure, efficacy, complications, and controversies of POEM in the treatment of esophageal motility disorders, as well as the current and future perspectives of POEM were studied. RESULTS: POEM is safe and effective in the treatment of esophageal motility disorders, but the GERD reflux rate is higher. CONCLUSIONS: POEM can be a new option for the treatment of esophageal movement disorders, but large sample, multi-center, long-term study reports are needed, and it promotes the development of NOTES technology.

Stricter national standards are required for credentialing of endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography in the United States.

Endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is now a vital modality with primarily therapeutic and occasionally solely diagnostic utility for numerous biliary/pancreatic disorders. It has a significantly steeper learning curve than that for other standard gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopies, such as esophagogastroduodenoscopy or colonoscopy, due to greater technical difficulty and higher risk of complications. Yet, GI fellows have limited exposure to ERCP during standard-three-year-GI-fellowships because ERCP is much less frequently performed than esophagogastroduodenoscopy/colonoscopy. This led to adding an optional year of training in therapeutic endoscopy. Yet many graduates from standard three-year-fellowships without advanced training intensely pursue independent/unsupervised ERCP privileges despite inadequate numbers of performed ERCPs and unacceptably low rates of successful selective cannulation of desired (biliary or pancreatic) duct. Hospital credentialing committees have traditionally performed ERCP credentialing, but this practice has led to widespread flouting of recommended guidelines (e.g., planned privileging of applicant with 20% successful cannulation rate, or after performing only 7 ERCPs); and intense politicking of committee members by applicants, their practice groups, and potential competitors. Consequently, some gastroenterologists upon completing standard fellowships train and learn ERCP "on the job" during independent/unsupervised practice, which can result in bad outcomes: high rates of failed bile duct cannulation. This severe clinical problem is indicated by publication of ≥ 12 ERCP competency studies/guidelines during last 5 years. However, lack of mandatory, quantitative, ERCP credentialing criteria has permitted neglect of recommended guidelines. This work comprehensively reviews literature on ERCP credentialing; reviews rationales for proposed guidelines; reports problems with current system; and proposes novel criteria for competency. This work advocates for mandatory, national, written, minimum, quantitative, standards, including cognitive skills (possibly assessed by a nationwide examination), and technical skills, assessed by number performed (≥ 200-250 ERCPs), types of ERCPs, success rate (approximately ≥ 90% cannulation of desired duct), and letters of recommendation by program director/ERCP mentor. Mandatory criteria should ideally not be monitored by a hospital committee subjected to intense politicking by applicants, their employers, and sometimes even competitors, but an independent national entity, like the National Board of Medical Examiners/American Board of Internal Medicine.

Analysis of factors related to poor outcome after e-learning training in endoscopic diagnosis of early gastric cancer using magnifying narrow-band imaging.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: An e-learning system teaching endoscopic diagnostic process for early gastric cancer using magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (M-NBI) was established, and its efficacy in improving the diagnostic performance for early gastric cancer was proven in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. The aim of this study was to clarify the difference in learning effect in each lesion characteristic. METHODS: Three hundred sixty-five participants diagnosed 40 gastric lesions based on M-NBI findings using the vessel-plus-surface classification system. The diagnosis data collected from each participant were assessed in this study. The accuracy of NBI cancer diagnosis was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC/ROC) analysis. AUC/ROCs were separately calculated in each lesion characteristic (shape and size), and the data were compared between tests 1 and 3. RESULTS: Continuous net reclassification improvement (cNRI) analysis of all lesions revealed significant improvement in reclassification when participants underwent e-learning (cNRI, 1.17; P < .01). The integrated discrimination improvement analysis demonstrated that the e-learning system improved diagnostic ability (.19; P < .01). According to the analysis depending on the lesion's characteristics, high AUC/ROCs were demonstrated in depressed and small lesions (<10 mm; .90 and .93, respectively). The cNRI analysis showed remarkable e-learning improvement in both depressed (cNRI, 1.33; P < .01) and small lesions (cNRI, 1.46; P < .01). However, no significant e-learning improvement was observed in elevated or flat lesions. CONCLUSIONS: In M-NBI education for endoscopists, a good learning outcome was obtained in depressed and small lesions, but a poor learning outcome was demonstrated in elevated and flat lesions. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000008569.).

Transjugular aspiration liver biopsy performed by hepatologists trained in HVPG measurements is safe and provides important diagnostic information.

BACKGROUND: Transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) represents an alternative to percutaneous liver biopsy especially in patients with impaired coagulation and ascites. AIMS: To describe safety and diagnostic yield of aspiration TJLB performed by hepatologists experienced in hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurements. METHODS: 445 TJLB of 399 patients between 01/2007-12/2016 were retrospectively assessed. RESULTS: Histological diagnosis was obtained in 423 (95.1%) biopsies - including 11 (100%) patients with acute liver failure and 34 (97.1%) patients after liver transplantation. A median number of 5 portal tracts (interquartile range:2-9) was obtained. HVPG negatively correlated with sample length (Spearman ρ = -0.310; p < 0.001) and number of portal tracts (ρ = -0.212; p < 0.001). Among n = 151 patients with unknown etiology of liver disease, etiology was successfully identified on liver histology in 126 patients (83.4%). Complications occurred in 28 biopsies (6.3%) including 25 (5.6%) minor and 3 (0.7%) major complications. No deaths due to TJLB were observed. Neither the presence of ascites (6.6% complications) nor of coagulopathy (platelets<50G/L and/or prothrombin time<50%; 4.8% complications) increased the risk for complications. CONCLUSIONS: TJLB performed by hepatologists experienced in HVPG measurements is safe - even in patients with ascites or coagulopathy. TJLB has good diagnostic value for histological evaluation of liver disease and acute liver failure.

Training and assessment in flexible sigmoidoscopy: using a novel direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) assessment tool.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Data supporting milestone development during flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) training are lacking. We aimed to present validity evidence for our formative direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) assessment in FS, and use DOPS to establish competency benchmarks and define learning curves for a national training cohort. METHODS: This prospective UK-wide (211 centres) study included all FS formative DOPS assessments submitted to the national e-portfolio. Reliability was estimated from generalisability theory analysis. Item and global DOPS scores were correlated with lifetime procedure count to study learning curves, with competency benchmarks defined using contrasting groups analysis. Multivariable binary logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of DOPS competence. RESULTS: This analysis included 3,616 DOPS submitted for 468 trainees. From generalisability analysis, sources of overall competency score variance included: trainee ability (27%), assessor stringency (15%), assessor subjectivity attributable to the trainee (18%) and case-to-case variation (40%), which enabled the modelling of reliability estimates. The competency benchmark (mean DOPS score: 3.84) was achieved after 150-174 procedures. Across the cohort, competency development occurred in the order of: pre-procedural (50-74), non-technical (75-149), technical (125-174) and post-procedural (175-199) skills. Lifetime procedural count (p<0.001), case difficulty (p<0.001), and lifetime formative DOPS count (p=0.001) were independently associated with DOPS competence, but not trainee or assessor specialty. CONCLUSION: Sigmoidoscopy DOPS can provide valid and reliable assessments of competency during training and can be used to chart competency development. Contrary to earlier studies, based on destination-orientated endpoints, overall competency in sigmoidoscopy was attained after 150 lifetime procedures.

Musculoskeletal Injuries Are Commonly Reported Among Gastroenterology Trainees: Results of a National Survey.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopy-related musculoskeletal injuries are increasingly recognized among gastroenterologists. While injury rates and risk factors have been studied among practicing gastroenterologists, little is known about rates among trainees during fellowship. AIMS: This study analyzes the prevalence of endoscopy-related overuse injuries and risk factors for injuries among a national sample of gastroenterology (GI) fellows. We also surveyed GI fellowship program directors and fellows about perceptions of overuse injuries during GI training. METHODS: We distributed a 29-item electronic survey to GI fellows at accredited programs in the USA in April 2016. Survey items included demographic information, questions pertaining to injuries, and level of agreement on the importance of ergonomics training in GI fellowship. Additionally, we distributed a 7-item electronic survey to fellowship program directors evaluating perception of overuse injuries and prevention during fellowship training. Fisher's exact test determined factors associated with sustaining an injury. RESULTS: An estimated 1509 fellows received the survey. Eleven percent (n = 165) of gastroenterology fellows completed the survey. Twenty percent reported having a musculoskeletal injury. Female gender was the only factor associated with a higher rate of reported injury (p < 0.01). The most common injuries reported were thumb and other hand-related pain (n = 28 [64%]). CONCLUSIONS: Musculoskeletal injuries may affect up to 20% of GI fellows. Female fellows more frequently report injuries and may be at particularly high risk which has not been found in previously reported surveys of practicing gastroenterologists. Standardized curricula on ergonomic considerations and injury prevention are needed to enhance GI fellowship training and reduce injury rates.

How Do Hepatologists Gain Access to Liver Transplant Units?

Liver transplantation has evolved from an experimental treatment to be considered as the most effective therapy for end-stage liver disease and selected cases of hepatocellular carcinoma. Transplant hepatologists must have specific knowledge and abilities to treat those patients who receive a liver transplant. In Spain, approximately 1100 liver transplants are performed each year, and most centers assume both postoperative care and long-term follow-up, which has led to a significant work load in liver transplant units. Despite previous attempts to establish an official training program in hepatology, the Spanish health system does not presently have a specific liver transplant training program to guarantee that future needs of physicians are covered. Collaboration between health authorities and scientific societies is required to guarantee adequate assistance to liver transplant recipients in the future.

Effectiveness and safety of gastrointestinal endoscopy during a specific sedation training program for non-anesthesiologists.

INTRODUCTION: sedation is a key component for the improvement of sedation quality. A correct administration requires appropriate training. We performed a study to compare sedation effectiveness, safety and patient satisfaction when administered by gastroenterologists, with and without specific training. METHODS: a training program enrolled a group of gastroenterologists (trained group, n = 4) and their results were compared to those from a non-trained group (n = 3). ASA 1-3 patients who had undergone sedation by a gastroenterologist using midazolam and fentanyl were included over a period of 30 months. Safety was assessed in terms of the complication rate, effectiveness was assessed via the rate of completed endoscopic procedures and patient satisfaction was evaluated via a phone interview the day after the procedure. RESULTS: a total of 3,475 patients were sedated by gastroenterologists during the study period. Significant differences were found that favored the trained group for completed procedures (5.6% vs 8.9%). A lower rate of excessive sedation (1.3% vs 8.61%), hypoxemia (0.72% vs 2.49%) and post-procedural pain (1.8% vs 4.3%) were also achieved. Patient satisfaction surpassed 99.5% and there were no significant differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: our sedation training program improved the effectiveness and safety outcomes when compared to sedation administered by gastroenterologists without this specific training.

Sistema de Superación en Manometría Esofágica para residentes y especialistas de Gastroenterología / Self-Improvement Systems about Esophageal Manometry for Gastroenterology Residents and Specialists

Introducción: La superación profesional, contribuye a la educación permanente del profesional para lograr su actualización, dirigido a la superación profesional de gastroenterólogos especialistas y residentes del Servicio de Gastroenterología Hospital Clínico Quirúrgico "Hermanos Ameijeiras" sobre la técnica de Manometría Esofágica. Objetivos: Diseñar un curso de superación para mejorar el conocimiento e interpretación de la Manometría Esofágica. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio de enfoque mixto, educativo, de desarrollo que culmina con el diseño del curso en Manometría Esofágica dirigido a residentes y especialistas en gastroenterología del Servicio de Gastroenterología del Hospital Hermanos Ameijeiras, para lo cual se trabajó con los diez residentes y siete especialistas del servicio, además de tres profesores consultantes de gran experiencia, considerados expertos. Se utilizó la encuesta para residentes y especialistas y entrevista en profundidad con los profesores consultantes. El método estadístico permitió presentación y análisis de los datos cuantitativos y el análisis de contenido para las entrevistas a los expertos. Se consideraron los aspectos éticos requeridos para la investigación, de la institución y los involucrados en el estudio. Resultados: El 100 por ciento de participantes, carecen de conocimientos y habilidades en el uso de la Manometría Esofágica. Se diseñó un curso básico- teórico que contribuirá a prepararlos para hacer diagnóstico, pronóstico y tratamiento en la Enfermedad por Reflujo Gastroesofágico, la Acalasia y otros trastornos motores del esófago. Conclusiones: Las necesidades de aprendizaje, de residentes y especialistas, justificaron el diseño del curso, contribuirá a superar a gastroenterólogos en el manejo de las afecciones mencionadas(AU)

Introduction: Professional improvement contributes to permanent professional education to achieve updated levels, aimed at the professional improvement of gastroenterologists, both residents and specialists, of the Gastroenterology Service of Hermanos Ameijeiras Clinical-Surgical Hospital regarding the technique of esophageal manometry. Objectives: To design an updating course for improving the knowledge and interpretation of esophageal manometry. Methods: A mixed, educational, and developmental study was carried out, which culminated in the design of the course in Esophageal Manometry for residents and specialists in gastroenterology of the Gastroenterology Service of Hermanos Ameijeiras Hospital, for which work was done with the ten residents and seven specialists of the service, as well as three experienced consultant professors, considered experts. We used the survey for residents and specialists and the in-depth interview with the consulting professors. The statistical method allowed the presentation and analysis of the quantitative data and the content analysis for the interviews with the experts. The ethical aspects required for the investigation were considered, from the institution and those involved in the study. Results: 100 percent of participants lacked knowledge and skills in the use of esophageal manometry. A basic theoretical course was designed to help prepare them for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment regarding gastroesophageal reflux disease, achalasia, and other motor disorders of the esophagus. Conclusions: The learning needs of residents and specialists justified the course design, and will help overcome gastroenterologists in the management of the aforementioned conditions(AU)

The Paddington International Virtual Chromoendoscopy Score in ulcerative colitis exhibits very good inter-rater agreement after computerized module training: a multicenter study across academic and community practice (with video).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Electronic virtual chromoendoscopy (EVC) can demonstrate ongoing disease activity in ulcerative colitis (UC), even when Mayo subscores suggest healing. However, applicability of EVC technology outside the expert setting has yet to be determined. METHODS: Fifteen participants across 5 centers reviewed a computerized training module outlining high-definition and EVC (iScan) colonoscopy modes. Interobserver agreement was then tested (Mayo score, Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity [UCEIS], and the Paddington International Virtual Chromoendoscopy Score [PICaSSO] for UC), using a colonoscopy video library (30 cases reviewed pretraining and 30 post-training). Knowledge sustainability was retested in a second round (42 cases; 9/15 participants), 6 months after training provision. RESULTS: Pretraining intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were good for the Mayo endoscopic subscore (ICC, .775), UCEIS scoring erosions/ulcers (ICC, .770), and UCEIS overall (ICC, .786) and for mucosal (ICC, .754) and vascular components of PICaSSO (ICC, .622). For the vascular components of UCEIS, agreement was only moderate (ICC, .429) and did not enhance post-training (ICC, .417); conversely, use of PICaSSO improved post-training (mucosal ICC, .848; vascular, .746). Histologic correlation using the New York Mt. Sinai System was strong for both PICaSSO components (Spearman's ρ for mucosal: .925; vascular, .873; P < .001 for both). Moreover, accuracy in specifically discriminating quiescent from mild histologic strata was strongest for PICaSSO (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] for mucosal, .781; vascular, .715) compared with Mayo (AUROC, .708) and UCEIS (AUROC for UCEIS overall, .705; vascular, .562; bleeding, .645; erosions/ulcers, .696). Inter-rater reliability for PICaSSO was sustained by round 2 participants (round 1 and 2 ICC for mucosal, .873 and .869, respectively; vascular, .715 and .783, respectively), together with histologic correlation (ρ mucosal, .934; vascular, .938; P < .001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: PICaSSO demonstrates good interobserver agreement across all levels of experience, providing excellent correlation with histology. Given the ability to discriminate subtle endoscopic features, PICaSSO may be applied to refine stratified treatment paradigms for UC patients.

Fellows' perspective of HPB training programs in North America: results of a survey.

BACKGROUND: Sixteen hepatopancreatobiliary fellowship programs in North America are accredited by the Fellowship Council. This study aims to assess fellows' perceptions of their training program. METHODS: A multiple-choice questionnaire was sent to 35 fellows to assess how they perceived their training: academics, research, operative experiences, autonomy, mentorship, program quality and weaknesses. The survey was developed using the SurveyMonkey® tool. RESULTS: Twenty-four of 35 fellows completed the survey. Sixteen fellows reported structured didactics; 10 reported mandatory research. As to operative experiences; 9 fellows reported exposure to minimally-invasive liver surgery; 5 reported exposure to robotics. Fourteen fellows reported using ablation; 5 reported using ablation laparoscopically; 8 reported using mostly radiofrequency ablation; 1 reported using irreversible electroporation. Eighteen fellows reported excellent training; 20 reported mentorship; 19 reported operative autonomy. Limited exposure to medical oncology/multidisciplinary care, portal hypertension surgery, and robotics surgery were perceived as program weaknesses by 7, 9, and 7 fellows, respectively. CONCLUSION: Most fellows ranked their program quality and academic content as excellent, but they perceived a need for more exposure to medical oncology, portal hypertension surgery, and minimally-invasive surgery, with an emphasis on robotics. Fellowship training may need to integrate fellows' desires for enhanced proficiency in these clinical areas.

Interventional IBD: The Role of Endoscopist in the Multidisciplinary Team Management of IBD.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been traditionally managed by IBD medical doctors or IBDologists and colorectal surgeons. Complications related to IBD and IBD surgery, such as stricture, fistula, and abscess, are common. For the past decade, endoscopic therapy has emerged as a valid treatment option for those complications. Endoscopic therapy provides more effective therapy for those structural complications than medical treatment, while being a less invasive approach than surgery. Endoscopic therapy plays a growing role in bridging medical and surgical therapies and is becoming an important component in the multidisciplinary approach to complex IBD. In fact, endoscopic therapy has become the treatment of choice for anastomotic stricture and anastomotic sinus. The role of endoscopic resection of colitis-associated neoplasia is currently being explored. Interventional IBD is intellectually and technically challenging. We are calling for proper teaching and training of our next generation of IBD interventionists.

Knowledge Gaps among Physicians Caring for Multiethnic Populations at Increased Gastric Cancer Risk.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although gastric cancer (GC) prevalence in the United States overall is low, there is significantly elevated risk in certain racial/ethnic groups. Providers caring for high-risk populations may not be fully aware of GC risk factors and may underestimate the potential for selective screening. Our aim was to identify knowledge gaps among healthcare providers with respect to GC. METHODS: An Internet-based survey was distributed to primary care providers (PCPs) and gastroenterologists in New York City, which included questions regarding provider demographics, practice environment, GC risk factors, Helicobacter pylori, and screening practices. Three case vignettes were used to assess clinical management. RESULTS: Of 151 included providers (111 PCPs, 40 gastroenterologists), most reported caring for a racially/ethnically diverse population and 58% recommended GC screening for select populations. Although ＞85% recommended against testing patients from regions where H. pylori, a known carcinogen, is endemic, ＜50% were able to correctly identify non-Asian endemic regions. Minorities of respondents correctly identified Hispanic/Latino (29%), Black (22%), and Eastern European/Russian (19.7%) as additional higher-risk races/ethnicities. Vignette-based questions highlighted variability in the management of potentially higher-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: Despite caring for multiracial/ethnic populations, providers demonstrated deficiencies in identifying and managing patients with elevated GC risk. Focused educational efforts should be considered to address these deficiencies.

Diagnosis and predictors of sessile serrated adenoma after educational training in a large, community-based, integrated healthcare setting.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Sessile serrated adenomas (SSAs) are precursors of 15% to 30% of colorectal cancers but are frequently underdiagnosed. We sought to measure the SSA detection rate (SDR) and predictors of SSA detection after educational training for community gastroenterologists and pathologists. METHODS: Colonoscopy and pathology data (2010-2014) from 3 medical centers at Kaiser Permanente Northern California were accessed electronically. Gastroenterologists and pathologists attended a training session on SSA diagnosis in 2012. Mean SDRs and patient-level predictors of SSA detection post-training (2013-2014) were investigated. RESULTS: Mean SDRs increased from .6% in 2010-2012 to 3.7% in 2013-2014. The increase in the detection of proximal SSAs was accompanied by a decrease in the detection of proximal hyperplastic polyps (HPs). Among 34,161 colonoscopies performed in 2013 to 2014, SDRs for screening, fecal immunochemical test positivity, surveillance, and diagnostic indication were 4.2%, 4.5%, 4.9%, and 3.0%, respectively. SSA detection was lower among Asians (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], .46; 95% confidence interval [CI], .31-.69) and Hispanics (aOR, .59; 95% CI, .36-.95) compared with non-Hispanic whites and higher among patients with synchronous conventional adenoma (aOR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.15-1.86), HP (aOR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.30-2.34), and current smokers (aOR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.17-2.72). SDRs varied widely among experienced gastroenterologists, even after training (1.1%-8.1%). There was a moderately strong correlation between adenoma detection rate (ADR) and SDR for any SSA (r = .64, P = .0003) and for right-sided SSAs (r = .71, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Educational training significantly increased the detection of SSA, but a wide variation in SDR remained across gastroenterologists. SSA detection was inversely associated with Asian and Hispanic race/ethnicity and positively associated with the presence of conventional adenoma, HP, and current smoking. There was a moderately strong correlation between ADR and SDR.