Telemedicine in geriatric oncology - lessons learned from the COVID-19 experience.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Telemedicine quickly became integrated into healthcare caused by the Coronavirus 19 (COVID-19) pandemic. Rapid use of telemedicine into healthcare systems was supported by the World Health Organization and other prominent national organizations to reduce transmission of the virus while continuing to provide access to care. In this review, we explored the effect of this swift change in care and its impact on older adults with cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: Older adults are susceptible to the COVID-19 virus caused by various risk factors, such as comorbidity, frailty, decreased immunity, and cancer increases vulnerability to infection, hospitalization, and mortality. We found three major themes emerged in the literature published in the past 18 months, including access to care, telemedicine modes of communication, and the use of technology by older adults with cancer. These findings have brought insight into issues regarding healthcare disparities. SUMMARY: The utilization of telemedicine by older adults with cancer has potential future benefits with the integration of technology preparation prior to the patient's initial visit and addressing known health disparities. The hybrid model of care provides in-person and or remote access to clinicians which may allow older adults with cancer the flexibility needed to obtain quality cancer care.

[Development of advanced practice nursing in geriatric oncology]. / Développement de la pratique infirmière avancée en oncogériatrie.

The first challenge, after graduating as an advanced practice nurse is to establish a new model of care in one's place of practice. The feedback from the creation of an advanced practice nurse position in oncology in Amiens-Picardie university hospital, using a population-based approach, illustrates the roles and skills required in this new health profession.

August 2020 Interim EuGMS guidance to prepare European Long-Term Care Facilities for COVID-19.

PURPOSE: The European Geriatric Medicine Society (EuGMS) is launching a second interim guidance whose aim is to prevent the entrance and spread of COVID-19 into long-term care facilities (LTCFs). METHODS: The EuGMS gathered experts to propose a guide of measures to prevent COVID-19 outbreaks in LTCFs. It is based on the specific features of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in LTCFs, residents' needs, and on experiences conducted in the field. RESULTS: Asymptomatic COVID-19 residents and staff members contribute substantially to the dissemination of COVID-19 infection in LTCFs. An infection prevention and control focal point should be set up in every LTCF for (1) supervising infection prevention and control measures aimed at keeping COVID-19 out of LTCFs, (2) RT-PCR testing of residents, staff members, and visitors with COVID-19 symptoms, even atypical, and (3) isolating subjects either infected or in contact with infected subjects. When a first LCTF resident or staff member is infected, a facility-wide RT-PCR test-retest strategy should be implemented for detecting all SARS-CoV-2 carriers. Testing should continue until no new COVID-19 cases are identified. The isolation of residents should be limited as much as possible and associated with measures aiming at limiting its negative effects on their mental and somatic health status. CONCLUSIONS: An early recognition of symptoms compatible with COVID-19 may help to diagnose COVID-19 residents and staff more promptly. Subsequently, an earlier testing for SARS-CoV-2 symptomatic and asymptomatic LTCF staff and residents will enable the implementation of appropriate infection prevention and control. The negative effects of social isolation in residents should be limited as much as possible.

[The joint management of Geriatrics-Neurosurgery of patients older than 75 years reduces the average stay, morbidity, hospital readmissions and mortality per year]. / El manejo conjunto Geriatría-Neurocirugía de pacientes mayores de 75 años reduce la estancia media, la morbilidad, los reingresos hospitalarios y la mortalidad al año.

OBJECTIVE: Population ageing is a reality for which national health systems are not adapted. The World Health Organisation has already raised awareness about the implementation of specific measures, from undergraduate training to dedicated elderly care units, to tackle this situation. In this article, the aim is to analyse the potential benefits of geriatric monitoring on elderly neurosurgical patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A descriptive analysis was performed in this medical centre, comparing the information collected from elderly patients (over 75 years of age) admitted into the neurosurgical department during 2periods: June 2015 to February 2017, in which a shared geriatric monitoring was implemented, and between October 2013 and May 2015, equivalent period, in which only the geriatrician performed the evaluation of the patients' general condition, before referring them to other social-healthcare units. A number of factors were considered, including mean age, gender, the neurosurgical condition that led to admission, mean stay, infectious complications, acute confusional syndrome, admission into an intensive care unit, need for support from other medical departments, reoperations, mortality during hospitalisation, referral to social-health units, readmission within a month, and mortality within a year. RESULTS: A total of 173 patients on shared monitoring were compared to 189 patients from the previous period. Both groups had similar demographic characteristics. During the analysis, a significant reduction was observed in shared monitoring as regards, mean hospitalisation, infectious complications, admissions into an intensive care unit, the need for support from other medical departments, readmissions within a month, and mortality within a year. CONCLUSIONS: On patients of over 75 years of age, shared geriatric-neurosurgical monitoring reduces mean hospitalisation, morbidity, the need for support from other medical departments, early readmission, and mortality within a year. This strategy prioritises patient care, reduces costs, and rationalises resources.

Views of medical practitioners about deprescribing in older adults: Findings from an Italian qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Even though increasing attention is given to deprescribing owing to the risks related to polypharmacy in older adults, deprescribing is not yet part of clinical culture. METHODS: We conducted three focus groups with 25 internists, geriatricians and general practitioners to explore the factors influencing the implementation of deprescribing in the Italian context, and more specifically: i. to investigate the barriers to deprescribing; ii. to define strategies and actions to address these barriers; and iii. to identify skills and tools that may assist in implementing deprescribing in clinical practice. Thematic analysis was used. RESULTS: Six themes were identified: Good reasons for deprescribing, Difficulties and doubts about deprescribing, System factors affecting polypharmacy and deprescribing, Perspectives on how to practically approach polypharmacy, Need for effective communication with patients and caregivers, Taking responsibility and starting action. Participants reported a willingness to challenge themselves by addressing the barriers to deprescribing through regular review of prescriptions and collaboration with colleagues and patients. CONCLUSIONS: Italian internists, geriatricians and general practitioners reported many system-level barriers to deprescribing as well as some doubts about its necessity. Strategies to address the barriers to deprescribing include regular medication review and enhancing collaboration with colleagues and patients. Additionally, participants were willing to challenge themselves and use uncertainty as an impetus for deprescribing.

Fractura de cadera y geriatría: una unión necesaria / Hip fracture and geriatrics: a necessary union

Las personas mayores con fractura de cadera tienen un aumento del riesgo de mortalidad de 5 a 8 veces por todas las causas, y un riesgo mucho mayor de institucionalización por pérdida funcional, ya que solo el 50% de los pacientes que sobreviven, recuperan la actividad de la vida diaria previa a la fractura. Las intervenciones para prevenir dichos resultados, incluyendo una segunda fractura, se transforma en el objetivo principal en estos pacientes. El modelo de atención de ortogeriatría es un enfoque de atención multidimensional para los pacientes que sufren una fractura de cadera, que por lo general, es secundario a una caída desde su propia altura, conocida como fractura por fragilidad. Este modelo de atención desarrollado por geriatras y traumatólogos con la asistencia de un equipo multidisciplinario, incluye una evaluación integral perioperatoria y un equipo de enfermería centrada en la función premórbida del paciente, la cognición, las comorbilidades, que permite crear un plan individualizado, para ser monitorizado y asegurar su cumplimiento, los primeros dos años después de la fractura. Este esquema de trabajo ha demostrado mejorar el retorno a la función previa y la disminución de la mortalidad, con un costo reducido o un aumento de utilidad expresada en calidad de vida, por lo que es la atención más rentable para los pacientes que sufren una fractura de cadera.

Older people with hip fracture have an increased risk of mortality 5 to 8 times, for all causes and a much higher risk of institutionalization due to functional loss, because only 50% of patients who survive, recover the activity of daily life before the fracture. Interventions to prevent such results, including a second fracture, become the principal objective in these patients. The orthogeriatric care model, is a multidimensional approach for patients who suffer a hip fracture, which is usually secondary to a fall from their own height, known as a fragility fracture. This model of care developed by geriatricians and traumatologists with help of a multidisciplinary team, includes a comprehensive perioperative assessment and a nursing team focused on the premorbid patient state, cognition, comorbidities, which allows creating an individualized plan, to be monitored and ensure compliance, the first 2 years. This work scheme has been shown to improve the return of the function and the reduction of mortality at a reduced cost or an expressed utility in quality of life, making it the most cost-effective care for patients suffering from a hip fracture.

[Cross-speciality geriatrics: A health-care challenge for the 21st century]. / Geriatría transversal. Un reto asistencial para el siglo xxi.

Increasing numbers of older persons are being treated by specialties other than Geriatric Medicine. Specialists turn to Geriatric Teams when they need to accurately stratify their patients' risk and prognosis, predict the potential impact of their, often, invasive interventions, optimise their clinical status, and contribute to discharge planning. Oncology and Haematology, Cardiology, General Surgery, and other surgical departments are examples where such collaborative working is already established, to a varying extent. The use of the term "Cross-speciality Geriatrics" is suggested when geriatric care is provided in clinical areas traditionally outside the reach of Geriatric Teams. The core principles of Geriatric Medicine (comprehensive geriatric assessment, patient-centred multidisciplinary targeted interventions, and input at point-of-care) are adapted to the specifics of each specialty and applied to frail older patients in order to deliver a holistic assessment/treatment, better patient/carer experience, and improved clinical outcomes. Using Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment methodology and Frailty scoring in such patients provides invaluable prognostic information, helps in decision making, and enables personalised treatment strategies. There is evidence that such an approach improves the efficiency of health care systems and patient outcomes. This article includes a review of these concepts, describes existing models of care, presents the most commonly used clinical tools, and offers examples of excellence in this new era of geriatric care. In an ever ageing population it is likely that teams will be asked to provide Cross-specialty Geriatrics across different Health Care systems. The fundamentals for its implementation are in place, but further evidence is required to guide future development and consolidation, making it one of the most important challenges for Geriatrics in the coming years.

Streamlining an existing hip fracture patient pathway in an acute tertiary adult Irish hospital to improve patient experience and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To improve access for hip fracture patients to surgery within 48 h of presentation to the Emergency Department, and to increase the number of patients receiving pre-operative orthogeriatric review, through streamlining an existing hip fracture patient pathway. DESIGN: A pre-post design involving a multi-disciplinary team use of the Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve and Control framework integral to Lean Six Sigma (LSS) methodology, to assess and adapt the existing hip fracture pathway from presentation to Emergency Department to the initiation of surgery. SETTING: A 600-bed teaching hospital in Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: Nursing, medical, administrative and physiotherapy staff working across Emergency Medicine, Orthogeriatrics and Orthopaedic Specialities and Project management. INTERVENTIONS: LSS methodology was used to redesign an existing pathway, improving patient access to ortho-geriatrician assessment, pain relief and surgery in line with the Irish Hip Fracture Data Base Key performance indicators. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Access to pain relief, access to surgery and volume of patients receiving ortho-geriatric assessment. RESULTS: The percentage of patients undergoing surgery within 48 h of presentation to Emergency Department increased from 55% to 79% at 3 months, and to 85% at 6 months. Improvements were also achieved in the secondary performance metrics relevant to quality of patient care. All care pathway changes were cost neutral. CONCLUSIONS: Hip fracture surgery within 48 h of presentation to hospital is a recognized standard of hip fracture care associated with decreased length of stay and decreased mortality. With respect to this performance metric, this intervention has contributed to improved patient outcomes.

[Advances made for the comfort of elderly patients with cancer]. / Progrès réalisés pour le confort des patients âgés atteints de cancer.

The ageing of the French population and the high occurrence of cancers in the population of patients aged over 75 has resulted in the convergence of the competences of two specialties, oncology and geriatrics, in order to optimise the quality of the care provided. Geriatric oncology care must be adapted to the medical, psychological and social situation of each patient.

Geriatric oncology: assessing the needs of older people with cancer.

A majority of cancer cases now occur among older people, but this group is less likely to receive treatment and outcomes are poorer than in younger people. Age by itself can be a poor predictor of who will benefit from treatment with surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Comprehensive geriatric assessment is a multidisciplinary, multidomain process that helps to identify frailty, which is associated with increased mortality. Comprehensive geriatric assessment highlights areas that should be optimized before treatment and helps support a shared decision-making approach. Geriatricians, oncologists and surgeons now work together to help assess and support older people with cancer.

[The disclosure in geriatric oncology, the benefit of the nurse-doctor partnership]. / L'annonce en oncogériatrie, l'efficience du binôme infirmier-médecin.

From the disclosure of a diagnosis to the withdrawal of treatments, an elderly patient with cancer is confronted with numerous disclosures along the care pathway. These become mixed up with the care and support actions. Collaboration and procedures shared between doctors and nurses are essential for the optimised care of the elderly patient and his or her helpers.

Understanding and improving multidisciplinary team working in geriatric medicine.

Geriatric medicine is a speciality that has historically relied on team working to best serve patients. The nature of frailty in older people means that people present with numerous comorbidities, which in turn require a team-based approach to be managed, including allied health professionals, social work and nursing alongside medicine. The 'engine room' of the speciality has thus for many years been the multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting-something other specialities have discovered only recently. Yet, rather paradoxically, the speciality has been slow compared to others (e.g. trauma, surgery, cancer) to reflect more formally on how team working can be enhanced, trained and supported in geriatric teams. This paper is a reflective review, grounded on our respective expertise in geriatric medicine and improvement science, on practice and its changing patterns within geriatric medicine, and the role of MDTs within it (Part 1). It offers a perspective from behavioural safety science, which has been studying team-working in healthcare for the last 20 years (Part 2) and concludes with practical suggestions, based on evidence, on how to integrate evidence and best practice into modern geriatric medicine-to address current and future challenges (Part 3).

[Adapting the care pathway]. / Adapter le parcours de soins.

The implementation of cross-functional measures along the care pathway of cancer patients in France is globally lower in the elderly. However, age is not a criterion for excluding curative treatment, and the evaluation of physical, psychological and social resources and comorbidities is particularly significant in this population. Identifying needs in terms of support care which influences the patient's quality of life as well as the efficacy of treatments is also essential. The objective of geriatric oncology coordination is to offer elderly cancer patients global treatment, curative or otherwise, through the putting in place of a personalised care programme.

[Risk assessment in medical geriatric oncology]. / Évaluation des risques en oncogériatrie médicale.

The assessment of risks in medical geriatric oncology requires close collaboration between oncologists and geriatricians. Vulnerability, death and severe chemotoxicity during cancer treatment represent the main risks to be assessed before making a decision regarding treatment in elderly patients with cancer. A comprehensive geriatric assessment and predictive scores enable a multidimensional assessment of the elderly cancer patient to be carried out.