RESUMO
We used a rapid antigen test for the detection of carbapenemases directly from positive blood culture bottles of pediatric hemato-oncologic patients, known carriers of carbapenemase-producing enterobacteriaceae. Resistance mechanism was detected within 15 minutes of observing Gram-negative bacilli from a positive bottle, leading to treatment modification. This simple-to-use, inexpensive assay shortens the interval between empiric to tailored antimicrobial therapy.
Assuntos
Antígenos de Bactérias/sangue , Proteínas de Bactérias/biossíntese , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos/enzimologia , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos/isolamento & purificação , Cromatografia de Afinidade/métodos , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiologia , beta-Lactamases/biossíntese , Adolescente , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Proteínas de Bactérias/análise , Hemocultura/economia , Hemocultura/métodos , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos/classificação , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos/efeitos dos fármacos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Cromatografia de Afinidade/economia , Cromatografia de Afinidade/instrumentação , Cromatografia de Afinidade/normas , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , beta-Lactamases/análiseRESUMO
Background: Currently, one of the most pressing problems in the field of orthopedic surgery is peri-prosthetic joint infection [PJI]. While there are numerous ways to detect PJI, current clinical detection methods differ across institutions and have varying criteria and protocols. Some of these methods include the Modified Musculoskeletal Infection Society system, culturing, polymerase chain reaction, the determination of the presence of certain biomarkers, testing for the presence of alpha defensin peptides, and leukocyte level testing. Methods: This review summarizes the most recent publications in the field of PJI detection to highlight current strengths as well as provide future directions to find the system for the quickest, cost-effective, and most accurate way to diagnose these types of infections. Results: The results of this literature review suggest that, while each method of diagnosis has its advantages, each has various drawbacks as well. Current methods can be expensive, take days to weeks to complete, be prone to contamination, and can produce ambiguous results. Conclusions: The findings in this review emphasize the need for a more comprehensive and accurate system for diagnosing PJI. In addition, the specific comparison of advantages and drawbacks can be useful for researchers and clinicians with goals of creating new diagnostic tests for PJIs, as well as in clinical scenarios to determine the correct treatment for patients.
Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores , Hemocultura/economia , Hemocultura/métodos , Humanos , Contagem de Leucócitos/economia , Contagem de Leucócitos/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/economia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , alfa-Defensinas/sangueAssuntos
Hemocultura/estatística & dados numéricos , Celulite (Flegmão)/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemocultura/economia , Celulite (Flegmão)/sangue , Celulite (Flegmão)/economia , Diagnóstico por Imagem/economia , Diagnóstico por Imagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos DesnecessáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bacterially contaminated platelets (PLTs) remain a serious risk. The Food and Drug Administration has issued draft guidance recommending hospitals implement secondary testing or transfuse PLTs that have been treated with pathogen reduction technology (PRT). The cost implications of these approaches are not well understood. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We modeled incurred costs when hospitals acquire, process, and transfuse PLTs that are PRT treated with INTERCEPT (Cerus Corp.) or secondary tested with the PLT PGD Test (Verax Biomedical). RESULTS: Hospitals will spend $221.27 (30.0%) more per PRT-treated apheresis PLT unit administered compared to a Zika-tested apheresis PLT unit that is irradiated and PGD tested in hospital. This difference is reflected in PRT PLT units having: 1) a higher hospital purchase price ($100.00 additional charge compared to an untreated PLT); 2) lower therapeutic effectiveness than untreated PLTs among hematologic-oncologic patients, which contributes to additional transfusions ($96.05); or 3) fewer PLT storage days, which contributes to higher outdating cost from expired PLTs ($67.87). Only a small portion of the incremental costs for PRT-treated PLTs are offset by costs that may be avoided, including primary bacterial culture, secondary bacterial testing ($26.65), hospital irradiation ($8.50), Zika testing ($4.47), and other costs ($3.03). CONCLUSION: The significantly higher cost of PRT-treated PLTs over PGD-tested PLTs should interest stakeholders. For hospitals that outdate PLTs, savings associated with expiration extension to 7 days by adding PGD testing will likely be substantially greater than the cost of implementing PGD-testing. Our findings might usefully inform a hospital's decision to select a particular blood safety approach.
Assuntos
Plaquetas/microbiologia , Transfusão de Plaquetas/efeitos adversos , Hemocultura/economia , Preservação de Sangue/economia , Desinfecção/economia , Humanos , Transfusão de Plaquetas/economia , Risco , Esterilização/economiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: It is unclear when routine workup of postoperative pyrexia (POP) following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) should be performed. METHODS: A retrospective electronic database search was conducted on 25,558 consecutive patients undergoing primary or revision TJA between June 2001 and June 2013. We identified patient demographics, procedure type, characteristics of feverish patients, and febrile complications. The estimated costs for chest x-ray (CXR), urinalysis, urine culture, and blood culture were investigated. RESULTS: POP occurred in 46% of TJAs. A total of 11,589 separate workups were performed in 90.5% of POP patients, of which 2.4% were positive. Urinalysis, urine culture, blood culture, and CXR were positive in 38.7%, 9.5%, 7.0%, and 0.2%, respectively. Febrile complications occurred in 4.5% and the infectious complications rate was 2.0%. The positive rate of fever workups was significantly higher in patients with the first POP occurring after postoperative day 3, POP > 102°F, multiple fever spikes, and patients undergoing revision TJA. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that the time of first POP, the maximum temperature, multiple fever spikes, and revision TJA were independent predictors of febrile complications. The estimated cost for 11,319 negative workups in patients with POP was $4,636,976.80, with CXR costing $4,613,182.00. CONCLUSION: Selective workup of POP following TJA should be performed in patients with higher temperatures, fever occurring after postoperative day 3, those with multiple fever spikes, and those undergoing revision TJA. CXR with an extremely low positive rate should not routinely be ordered.