Safety and tolerability of OP-724 in patients with haemophilia and liver cirrhosis due to HIV/HCV coinfection: an investigator-initiated, open-label, non-randomised, single-centre, phase I study.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with haemophilia and HIV who acquire hepatitis C virus (HCV) after receiving contaminated blood products can experience accelerated progression of liver fibrosis and a poor prognosis, making liver disease a prominent cause of mortality among these patients. In the current study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the potential antifibrotic agent OP-724-a CREB-binding protein/ß-catenin inhibitor-in this patient subset. DESIGN: In this single-centre, open-label, non-randomised, phase I trial, we sequentially enrolled patients with cirrhosis following HIV/HCV coinfection classified as Child-Pugh (CP) class A or B. Five patients received an intravenous infusion of OP-724 at doses of 140 or 280 mg/m2 for 4 hours two times weekly over 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs). Secondary endpoints included the incidence of AEs and improved liver stiffness measure (LSM), as determined by vibration-controlled transient elastography. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04688034). RESULTS: Between 9 February 2021 and 5 July 2022, five patients (median age: 51 years) were enrolled. All five patients completed 12 cycles of treatment. SAEs were not observed. The most common AEs were fever (60%) and gastrointestinal symptoms (diarrhoea: 20%, enterocolitis: 20%). Improvements in LSM and serum albumin levels were also observed. CONCLUSION: In this preliminary assessment, intravenous administration of 140 or 280 mg/m2/4 hours OP-724 over 12 weeks was well tolerated by patients with haemophilia combined with cirrhosis due to HIV/HCV coinfection. Hence, the antifibrotic effects of OP-724 warrant further assessment in patients with cirrhosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04688034.

Severe case of postpartum-acquired haemophilia A after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Acquired factor VIII inhibitor, also known as acquired haemophilia A, has been associated with the postpartum state in young females. Treatment of acquired haemophilia A is focused on two goals: control of bleeding and eliminating the factor VIII inhibitor. Management requires successful intervention to accomplish both goals. Here, we describe the presentation and management of a case of acquired haemophilia A resulting in particularly severe and protracted intra-abdominal bleeding after routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a young and otherwise healthy female at 3 months postpartum. Due to diffuse intra-abdominal bleeding, she required return to the operating room on five occasions for intra-abdominal packing, reassessment of bleeding and ultimate fascial closure. Her abdomen was open for 5 days. She was treated with activated recombinant human factor VIIa to bypass inhibited factor VIII, and with immunosuppression using steroids, cyclophosphamide and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab. She achieved remission after 6 weeks of treatment.

Single centre experience of the use of emicizumab in previously untreated and minimally treated patients under 18 months of age.

Emicizumab has revolutionised haemophilia A treatment landscape and significantly reduced treatment burden, particularly in the paediatric population. We conducted a retrospective study, focused on infants aged ≤18 months with severe haemophilia A. The study included 16 patients, with a median age of 8.2 months and median treatment duration of 61.6 weeks. Before commencing emicizumab, six patients were minimally treated with ≤5 exposure days while 10 were previously untreated patients. Notably, all patients had no inhibitors at baseline, and none developed new inhibitors during the study period. Emicizumab was well tolerated, with no observed side effects or major bleeding events.

[Successful immunosuppressive therapy in female hemophilia A developing inhibitor after perioperative administration of factor VIII products].

A 62-year-old woman was diagnosed as a hemophilia A carrier (factor VIII activity 35%) on preoperative examination of an ovarian tumor. A total of 35,600 units of recombinant factor VIII products was administered perioperatively. On postoperative day 95, a subcutaneous hematoma formed and immunosuppressive therapy with prednisolone was started based on an APTT of 66 seconds, factor VIII (FVIII) activity of 3%, and FVIII inhibitor of 1 BU/ml. During this treatment, the patient was hospitalized due to ankle joint bleeds and required hemostatic treatment, but the inhibitor disappeared and FVIII activity recovered to 30% after postoperative day 438 with cyclophosphamide. F8 analysis revealed the patient carried a heterozygosity of p.Arg391Cys, which has previously been categorized as cross-reacting material (CRM)-positive severe hemophilia A. No high-risk mutations for inhibitor development were found. We also report the results of a desmopressin acetate hydrate test administered to the patient to prepare for future treatment in case of hemorrhage, since high-dose FVIII administration may have been a factor in inhibitor development.

Eptacog beta for the management of patients with haemophilia A and B with inhibitors: A European perspective.

Eptacog beta (activated), a recombinant human factor VIIa (rFVIIa), was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2020 (SEVENFACT®, LFB & HEMA Biologics) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2022 (CEVENFACTA®, LFB). In Europe, eptacog beta is indicated for the treatment of bleeds and the prevention of bleeds during surgery or invasive procedures in adults and adolescents (≥12 years old) with congenital haemophilia A or B with high-titre inhibitors (≥5 BU) or with low-titre inhibitors who are expected to have a high anamnestic response to factor VIII or factor IX, or to be refractory to increased dosing of these factors. The efficacy and safety of eptacog beta were evaluated in three Phase III clinical studies, PERSEPT 1, 2 and 3. For the EMA filing dossier, the analysis of data from PERSEPT 1 and 2 differed from the analysis used to support the filing in the US. In this review, we summarise current data regarding the mode of action, clinical efficacy and safety of eptacog beta for the management of haemophilia A and B in patients with inhibitors from a European perspective. In addition to providing a valuable summary of the analyses of the clinical data for eptacog beta conducted for the EMA, our review summarises the potential differentiators for eptacog beta compared with other current bypassing agents.

Recombinant porcine factor VIII in patients with congenital haemophilia A with inhibitors undergoing surgery: Phase 3, single-arm, open-label study.

INTRODUCTION: Recombinant porcine factor VIII (rpFVIII; susoctocog alfa) is predicted to provide functional FVIII activity in patients with congenital haemophilia A with inhibitors (CHAWI). AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rpFVIII in patients with CHAWI undergoing invasive procedures. METHODS: This phase 3, multicentre, single-arm, open-label study (NCT02895945) enrolled males aged 12-75 years with severe/moderately severe CHAWI who required surgical/invasive procedures. Patients received a loading dose of rpFVIII 1-2 h before surgery. The primary outcome was the proportion of all procedures with a 'good' or 'excellent' response (treatment success) on the global haemostatic efficacy assessment score. RESULTS: Of the eight dosed patients, five completed the study. Six of seven surgeries (85.7%; 95% confidence interval, 42.1-99.6) achieved treatment success; five were rated 'excellent', one was rated 'good'. Seven surgery-related bleeding episodes occurred in three patients during the study, with none requiring additional surgical intervention. Overall, six of eight patients experienced 17 treatment-emergent adverse events. Three patients developed de novo inhibitors to rpFVIII. Five patients reported anamnestic reactions, three to both human (h) FVIII (i.e., alloantibodies to exogenous FVIII detected with anti-hFVIII assays) and rpFVIII, and two to hFVIII only. Four serious adverse events were considered related to rpFVIII (three anti-rpFVIII antibody positive; one anamnestic reaction to hFVIII and rpFVIII). CONCLUSION: Good haemostasis was achieved with rpFVIII during the immediate perioperative period. The study was terminated early because the study sponsor and health authorities determined that the risk of anamnestic reactions outweighs the benefits in this study population.

Non-clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B.

BACKGROUND: Management of congenital hemophilia A and B is by prophylactic or on-demand replacement therapy with clotting factor concentrates. The effects of newer non-clotting factor therapies such as emicizumab, concizumab, marstacimab, and fitusiran compared with existing standards of care are yet to be systematically reviewed. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects (clinical, economic, patient-reported, and adverse outcomes) of non-clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeding and bleeding-related complications in people with congenital hemophilia A or B compared with prophylaxis with clotting factor therapies, bypassing agents, placebo, or no prophylaxis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Coagulopathies Trials Register, electronic databases, conference proceedings, and reference lists of relevant articles and reviews. The date of the last search was 16 August 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating people with congenital hemophilia A or B with and without inhibitors, who were treated with non-clotting factor therapies to prevent bleeds. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently reviewed studies for eligibility, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data for the primary outcomes (bleeding rates, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), adverse events) and secondary outcomes (joint health, pain scores, and economic outcomes). We assessed the mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), 95% confidence interval (CI) of effect estimates, and evaluated the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: Six RCTs (including 397 males aged 12 to 75 years) were eligible for inclusion. Prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy in people with inhibitors Four trials (189 participants) compared emicizumab, fitusiran, and concizumab with on-demand therapy in people with inhibitors. Prophylaxis using emicizumab likely reduced annualized bleeding rates (ABR) for all bleeds (MD -22.80, 95% CI -37.39 to -8.21), treated bleeds (MD -20.40, 95% CI -35.19 to -5.61), and annualized spontaneous bleeds (MD -15.50, 95% CI -24.06 to -6.94), but did not significantly reduce annualized joint and target joint bleeding rates (AjBR and AtjBR) (1 trial; 53 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Fitusiran also likely reduced ABR for all bleeds (MD -28.80, 95% CI -40.07 to -17.53), treated bleeds (MD -16.80, 95% CI -25.80 to -7.80), joint bleeds (MD -12.50, 95% CI -19.91 to -5.09), and spontaneous bleeds (MD -14.80, 95% CI -24.90 to -4.71; 1 trial; 57 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). No evidence was available on the effect of bleed prophylaxis using fitusiran versus on-demand therapy on AtjBR. Concizumab may reduce ABR for all bleeds (MD -12.31, 95% CI -19.17 to -5.45), treated bleeds (MD -10.10, 95% CI -17.74 to -2.46), joint bleeds (MD -9.55, 95% CI -13.55 to -5.55), and spontaneous bleeds (MD -11.96, 95% CI -19.89 to -4.03; 2 trials; 78 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but not target joint bleeds (MD -1.00, 95% CI -3.26 to 1.26). Emicizumab prophylaxis resulted in an 11.31-fold increase, fitusiran in a 12.5-fold increase, and concizumab in a 1.59-fold increase in the proportion of participants with no bleeds. HRQoL measured using the Haemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) physical and total health scores was improved with emicizumab, fitusiran, and concizumab prophylaxis (low-certainty evidence). Non-serious adverse events were higher with non-clotting factor therapies versus on-demand therapy, with injection site reactions being the most frequently reported adverse events. Transient antidrug antibodies were reported for fitusiran and concizumab. Prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy in people without inhibitors Two trials (208 participants) compared emicizumab and fitusiran with on-demand therapy in people without inhibitors. One trial assessed two doses of emicizumab (1.5 mg/kg weekly and 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly). Fitusiran 80 mg monthly, emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week, and emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly all likely resulted in a large reduction in ABR for all bleeds, all treated bleeds, and joint bleeds. AtjBR was not reduced with either of the emicizumab dosing regimens. The effect of fitusiran prophylaxis on target joint bleeds was not assessed. Spontaneous bleeds were likely reduced with fitusiran (MD -20.21, 95% CI -32.12 to -8.30) and emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly (MD -15.30, 95% CI -30.46 to -0.14), but not with emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week (MD -14.60, 95% CI -29.78 to 0.58). The percentage of participants with zero bleeds was higher following emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week (50% versus 0%), emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly (40% versus 0%), and fitusiran prophylaxis (40% versus 5%) compared with on-demand therapy. Emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week did not improve Haem-A-QoL physical and total health scores, EQ-5D-5L VAS, or utility index scores (low-certainty evidence) when compared with on-demand therapy at 25 weeks. Emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly may improve HRQoL measured by the Haem-A-QoL physical health score (MD -15.97, 95% CI -29.14 to -2.80) and EQ-5D-5L VAS (MD 9.15, 95% CI 2.05 to 16.25; 1 trial; 43 participants; low-certainty evidence). Fitusiran may result in improved HRQoL shown as a reduction in Haem-A-QoL total score (MD -7.06, 95% CI -11.50 to -2.62) and physical health score (MD -19.75, 95% CI -25.76 to -11.94; 1 trial; 103 participants; low-certainty evidence). The risk of serious adverse events in participants without inhibitors also likely did not differ following prophylaxis with either emicizumab or fitusiran versus on-demand therapy (moderate-certainty evidence). Transient antidrug antibodies were reported in 4% (3/80) participants to fitusiran, with no observed effect on antithrombin lowering. A comparison of the different dosing regimens of emicizumab identified no differences in bleeding, safety, or patient-reported outcomes. No case of treatment-related cancer or mortality was reported in any study group. None of the included studies assessed our secondary outcomes of joint health, clinical joint function, and economic outcomes. None of the included studies evaluated marstacimab. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from RCTs shows that prophylaxis using non-clotting factor therapies compared with on-demand treatment may reduce bleeding events, increase the percentage of individuals with zero bleeds, increase the incidence of non-serious adverse events, and improve HRQoL. Comparative assessments with other prophylaxis regimens, assessment of long-term joint outcomes, and assessment of economic outcomes will improve evidence-based decision-making for the use of these therapies in bleed prevention.

Recapitulating the immune system of hemophilia A patients with inhibitors using immunodeficient mice.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Treating hemophilia A patients who develop inhibitors remains a clinical challenge. A mouse model of hemophilia A can be used to test the efficacy of strategies for inhibitor suppression, but the differences in the immune systems of mice and humans limit its utility. To address this shortcoming, we established a humanized NOD/SCID-IL2rγnull hemophilia A (hu-NSG-HA) mouse model with a severely deficient mouse immune system presenting a patient's adapted immune cells. METHODS AND RESULTS: Through intrasplenic injection with patient inhibitor-positive peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), utilizing an adeno-associated viral delivery system expressing human BLyS, and regular FVIII challenge, human C19+ B cells were expanded in vivo to secrete anti-FVIII antibodies. Both the inhibitor and the human anti-FVIII IgG, including the predominant subclasses (IgG1 and IgG4) present in the majority of inhibitor patients, were detected in the mouse model. We further segregated and expanded the different clones of human anti-FVIII-secreting cells through subsequent transplantation of splenocytes derived from hu-NSG-HA mice into another NSG-HA mouse. By transplanting a patient's PBMCs into the NSG-HA mouse model, we demonstrated the success of reintroducing a strong anti-FVIII immune response for a short period in mice with the immune systems of inhibitor-positive patients. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate a potential tool for directly obtaining functional human-derived antigen-specific antibodies and antibody-secreting cells, which may have therapeutic value for testing patient-specific immune responses to treatment options to assist in clinical decisions.

Barriers to gene therapy, understanding the concerns people with haemophilia have: an exigency sub-study.

BACKGROUND: Gene therapy has the potential to offer people with haemophilia (PwH) a life free from bleeding and the burden posed by current treatment regimens. To date, gene therapy has only been available in clinical trial settings, to PwH without pre-existing or historical factor inhibitors, significant concomitant liver damage or pre-existing neutralising antibodies to the adeno-associated viruses used to deliver the therapy. Thus, most PwH treated at centres not currently involved in gene therapy trials, either as a referral/follow-up centre or as a dosing centre, have been unable to access the therapy. This Exigency sub-study aims to gain a greater understanding of the opinions of PwH in the United Kingdom who have not had access to gene therapy: asking what they understand, what concerns they have, and whether they perceive any barriers preventing their access to gene therapy. RESULTS: Twenty-three PwH were approached; 14 consented, and one withdrew prior to interview. The mean age of the participants was 35.7 years (range 25-74 years). Eleven had haemophilia A and two haemophilia B. Two were treated with standard half-life factor products, five with extended half-life products, five with a FVIII mimetic and one with a clinical trial product. One family member (a participant's partner) was also interviewed. The participants identified four barriers to gene therapy: concerns about the process of gene therapy (Expectations), uncertainty about the results (outcomes), (Access) to treatment, and a lack of understanding about gene therapy (education). CONCLUSIONS: This Exigency study subgroup sees gene therapy as a positive treatment development that promises an improved quality of life. For this participant group, four issues impact their decision to undergo gene therapy. If the promise of gene therapy is to be realised, these barriers need to be acknowledged and addressed by healthcare professionals, patient organisations, and gene therapy providers.

Rates of venous thromboembolism and use of thromboprophylaxis after major orthopedic surgery in patients with congenital hemophilia A or B: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-recognized complication after total joint replacement (TJR). Persons with hemophilia A or B are considered at low postoperative VTE risk due to their coagulation factor deficiencies, and administering pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis is often considered contraindicated. However, using factor replacement therapy could increase the postoperative VTE risk. OBJECTIVES: To analyze best available evidences of VTE rates in persons with hemophilia A or B undergoing lower limb TJR and the use of postoperative pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis. METHODS: We systematically screened 4 online biomedical databases to identify studies reporting VTE rates in patients with hemophilia after TJR. Case reports and case series with less than 10 patients were excluded. RESULTS: Twenty-six observational studies were included in this systematic review, reporting 1181 TJRs in patients with hemophilia A or B. Eight studies had VTE rates as the primary outcome. Five studies reported screen-detected VTE, while 21 reported symptomatic VTE events. Overall, 17 VTE events were reported (1.4%; 95% CI, 0.9%-2.3%), including 10 (6.6%) after 151 surgeries with postoperative VTE screening and 7 (0.7%) after 1080 surgeries without postoperative screening. Thromboprophylaxis protocols were specified in 21 studies; postoperative thromboprophylaxis was used in 15 (1.3%) surgeries. This information was not available for 29.0% of the analyzed population. CONCLUSION: Despite the low thromboprophylaxis use in patients with hemophilia, rates of symptomatic VTE after TJR appeared to be low. We also highlighted the need to better report the thrombotic outcome in persons with hemophilia to face the ongoing changes in the hemophilia landscape.

Emicizumab Prophylaxis in Patients with Severe Hemophilia A: Insights from A Resource Limited Country.

METHODS: In this prospective study, severe HA patients were recruited from January 2022 to June 2023. Inhibitor positive and inhibitor negative patients with annual bleeding rate (ABR) 8 or greater and past histories of bleeding like intra-cranial, intra-abdominal, and pseudo-tumors were included. Emicizumab loading dose was 3 mg/kg in the first 4 weeks, and the maintenance dose was started at week 5 at 6 mg/kg/month. Patients' detailed bleeding history and demographics were recorded. The five-level EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) was used to evaluate patients' HRQoL. Furthermore, Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) and Functional Independence score in Hemophilia (FISH) were applied for the assessment of joints at different time points. Results were analyzed by SPSS version 21. RESULTS: A total of 36 HA male patients with the mean age of 19.7 ± 14.42 years were recruited in the study; among them, 19 patients were inhibitor positive, while 17 were negative. Patients clinically presented with bleeding symptoms which included: hemarthrosis 95%, GI bleeding 13.8%, and bruises and gums bleeding 13.8%. Significant reduction was observed in the bleeding episodes after the therapeutic intervention, and joints assessment and Euro-Quality-of-life Visual Analog Scale showed a significant improvement in health after treatment. Similarly, there was a remarkable reduction in bleeding episodes and improved quality of life among HA patients. The ABR decreased from 53.6% episodes per year prior to treatment to 2.4% during Emicizumab therapy. Prior to initiating Emicizumab therapy, participants exhibited an average FISH score of 16 and HJHS score of 10, indicating moderate limitations due to joint-related issues. After treatment, the mean FISH score improved to 9 and HJHS score to 4 reflecting a substantial enhancement in participants' ability to perform daily activities (P < 0.057). CONCLUSION: Our results showed that HA patients on prophylactic treatment with Emicizumab were less restricted and had improved quality of life due to marked decrease in bleeding episodes which resulted in improved health and social lives. In addition, it was well tolerated, and no participant discontinued treatment because of adverse events.

Single-dose rituximab plus glucocorticoid versus cyclophosphamide plus glucocorticoid in patients with newly diagnosed acquired hemophilia A: A multicenter, open-label, randomized noninferiority trial.

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare but serious bleeding disorder. Randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the efficacy of immunosuppression therapy for AHA lacks. We conducted the first multicenter RCT aiming to establish whether the single-dose rituximab combination regimen was noninferior to the cyclophosphamide combination regimen. From 2017 to 2022, 63 patients with newly diagnosed AHA from five centers were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive glucocorticoid (methylprednisolone 0.8 mg/kg per day for the first 3 weeks and then tapered) plus single-dose rituximab (375 mg/m2 ; n = 31) or plus cyclophosphamide (2 mg/kg per day until inhibitor becomes negative, for a maximum of 5 weeks; n = 32). The primary outcome was complete remission (CR, defined as FVIII activity ≥50 IU/dL, FVIII inhibitor undetectable, immunosuppression tapered and no bleeding for 24 h without bypassing agents) rate measured within 8 weeks. The noninferiority margin was an absolute difference of 20%. Twenty-four (77.4%) patients in the rituximab group and 22 (68.8%) patients in the cyclophosphamide group achieved CR, which showed the noninferiority of the single-dose rituximab-based regimen (absolute difference = -8.67%, lower limit of the 95% confidence interval = -13.11%; Pnoninferiority = 0.005). No difference was found in the incidence of treatment-related adverse events. Single-dose rituximab plus glucocorticoid regimen showed similar efficacy and safety, without a reported risk of secondary malignancies or reproductive toxicity seen in cyclophosphamide, it might be recommended as a first-line therapy for AHA, especially in China where there is a young age trend in AHA patients. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03384277.

COVID-19 outcomes in persons with hemophilia: results from a US-based national COVID-19 surveillance registry.

BACKGROUND: Hypercoagulable state contributing to thrombotic complications worsens COVID-19 severity and outcomes, whereas anticoagulation improves outcomes by alleviating hypercoagulability. OBJECTIVES: To examine whether hemophilia, an inherent hypocoagulable condition, offers protection against COVID-19 severity and reduces venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk in persons with hemophilia (PwH). METHODS: A 1:3 propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study used national COVID-19 registry data (January 2020 through January 2022) to compare outcomes between 300 male PwH and 900 matched controls without hemophilia. RESULTS: Analyses of PwH demonstrated that known risk factors (older age, heart failure, hypertension, cancer/malignancy, dementia, and renal and liver disease) contributed to severe COVID-19 and/or 30-day all-cause mortality. Non-central nervous system bleeding was an additional risk factor for poor outcomes in PwH. Odds of developing VTE with COVID-19 in PwH were associated with pre-COVID VTE diagnosis (odds ratio [OR], 51.9; 95% CI, 12.8-266; p < .001), anticoagulation therapy (OR, 12.7; 95% CI, 3.01-48.6; p < .001), and pulmonary disease (OR, 16.1; 95% CI, 10.4-25.4; p < .001). Thirty-day all-cause mortality (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.75-2.11; p = .3) and VTE events (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.64-2.73; p = .4) were not significantly different between the matched cohorts; however, hospitalizations (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.20-2.10; p = .001) and non-central nervous system bleeding events (OR, 4.78; 95% CI, 2.98-7.48; p < .001) were increased in PwH. In multivariate analyses, hemophilia did not reduce adverse outcomes (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.74-2.31; p = .2) or VTE (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.44-2.67; p = .8) but increased bleeding risk (OR, 4.70; 95% CI, 2.98-7.48; p < .001). CONCLUSION: After adjusting for patient characteristics/comorbidities, hemophilia increased bleeding risk with COVID-19 but did not protect against severe disease and VTE.

Relapse of Acquired Hemophilia A after COVID-19 Infection.

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare disease in which an autoantibody causes bleeding by interacting with and inhibiting the coagulation activity of endogenous factor VIII (FVIII). Most cases of AHA are idiopathic; known causes include autoimmune diseases, malignant tumors, pregnancy, drugs, and viral infections. An 86-year-old man was diagnosed with AHA based on the following results: an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) extension of 130.7 seconds, presence of an inhibitor pattern in a mixing study, an endogenous factor VIII (FVIII) level of <1%, and an FVIII inhibitor titer of >5.1 Bethesda units (BU). The activity of von Willebrand factor (vWF) was diminished (<10%), which was considered a complication of acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS). The patient was started on prednisolone, and the inhibitor level eventually became negative. vWF values also became normal. However, 1 year later, he was hospitalized for treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Blood testing showed an aPTT extension of 110.5 seconds, FVIII level of 4%, and FVIII inhibitor titer of 0.8 BU; thus, a relapse of AHA was diagnosed. After administration of corticosteroid and remdesivir, he recovered from COVID-19 and AHA. The inhibitor level became negative on the 9th day of admission. Several studies have implicated COVID-19 infection and vaccination in AHA. We recommend that aPTT be measured when patients with AHA are infected with SARS-CoV2, to confirm AHA relapse.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of emicizumab prophylaxis in patients with haemophilia A in India.

INTRODUCTION: Emicizumab is the initial subcutaneously administered bispecific antibody approved as a prophylactic treatment for patients with haemophilia A (PwHA). AIM: This study assessed the economic evaluation of emicizumab treatment for non-inhibitor severe haemophilia A (HA) patients in India. METHODS: A Markov model evaluated the cost-effectiveness of emicizumab prophylaxis compared to on-demand therapy (ODT), low-dose prophylaxis (LDP; 1565 IU/kg/year), intermediate-dose prophylaxis (IDP; 3915 IU/kg/year) and high-dose prophylaxis (HDP; 7125 IU/kg/year) for HA patients without factor VIII inhibitors. Inputs from HAVEN-1 and HAVEN-3 trials included transition probabilities of different bleeding types. Costs and benefits were discounted at a 3.5% annual rate. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, emicizumab was cost-effective compared to HDP, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) of Indian rupees (INR) 27,869. Compared to IDP, ODT and LDP, emicizumab prophylaxis could be considered a cost-effective option if the paying threshold is >1 per capita gross domestic product (GDP) with ICER/QALY values of INR 264,592, INR 255,876 and INR 305,398, respectively. One-way sensitivity analysis (OWSA) highlighted emicizumab cost as the parameter with the greatest impact on ICERs. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) indicated that emicizumab had a 94.7% and 49.4% probability of being cost-effective at willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds of three and two-times per capita GDP. CONCLUSION: Emicizumab prophylaxis is cost-effective compared to HDP and provides value for money compared to ODT, IDP, and LDP for severe non-inhibitor PwHA in India. Its long-term humanistic, clinical and economic benefits outweigh alternative options, making it a valuable choice in resource-constrained settings.

Comparison of one-stage and chromogenic factor VIII assays to tailor the dose of recombinant factor VIII-Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc, efmoroctocog alfa) in adult patients with haemophilia A: Single-centre, real-world experience of surgery.

BACKGROUND: Efmoroctocog alfa (rFVIIIFc) is an extended half-life FVIII used notably in surgery for patients with haemophilia A. More information is needed of its usage in real-life. METHODS: Adult patients with HA followed at the Lyon Comprehensive Hemophilia Care Center who underwent a surgery with rFVIIIFc were included in this retrospective analysis. The pharmacokinetics of rFVIIIFc was assessed by plasma factor VIII clotting activity (FVIII:C) using both one-stage (OSA) and chromogenic substrate (CSA) assays. RESULTS: A total of 39 major and 31 minor surgeries were performed in 49 patients treated with rFVIIIFc. The median dose of rFVIIIFc infused before major and minor surgeries respectively was 67.5 ((interquartile range [IQR] 52.6-76.9) and 48.0 (38.5-51.8) IU/kg. For major surgeries, during the first postoperative week, the median residual FVIII:C was 78 (64.5-101.5) IU/dL with OSA and 99 (71-118) IU/dL with CSA (p < .0001). After surgery, rFVIIIFc doses were adjusted according to CSA results. This led to a significant decrease of rFVIIIFc consumption compared to what would have been proposed according to the OSA assay, without unusual bleeding or appearance of inhibitor. Considering the high price of the molecule, this was also associated with a significant cost reduction. CONCLUSION: Dose adjustment of rFVIIIFc according to FVIII: C measured by CSA is effective, safe and well tolerated in patients with haemophilia A undergoing invasive surgery.

Efficacy and safety of turoctocog alfa in patients with hemophilia A requiring surgical procedures: A multicentre retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Turoctocog alfa is a recombinant Factor VIII used in patients with hemophilia A. The aim is to assess the real-life evidence of turoctocog alfa in surgery. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Data were extracted from a national database. RESULTS: Turoctocog alfa was used for 86 surgeries (49 major and 37 minor) in 56 patients. The results are expressed as medians (interquartile range). Six (10.7%) patients had severe hemophilia A, four (7.1%) moderate, and 46 (82.2%) mild. For patients who underwent major surgeries, basal plasma FVIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C) levels were 15 IU.dL-1 (8-22). Eight (5-14) infusions were given, at a preoperative loading dose of 40.0 (35.0-45.5) IU.kg-1 and a total dose of 253.3 (125.0-507.0) IU.kg-1 . In patients who underwent minor surgeries, basal FVIII:C levels were 18 IU.dL-1 (9-31). Two (1-3) infusions were required, at a preoperative loading dose of 34.0 (28.8-38.5) IU.kg-1 and a total dose of 73.7 (37.6-122.1) IU.kg-1 . The overall clinical efficacy was judged excellent/good in 77 procedures (89.5%) and fair/poor in nine (10.5%). The fair/poor efficacy concerned seven patients (six mild hemophilia and one severe), for four urological surgeries, two dermatological procedures, one heart surgery, one ear-nose-throat procedure, and one dental avulsion in the patient with severe hemophilia. Three out of those seven patients received antiplatelet therapy. No thromboembolic events, anti-FVIII antibodies, or adverse events were reported. DISCUSSION: The efficacy and safety of turoctocog alfa were confirmed for the management of surgery in patients with hemophilia A. No adverse events were observed and overall efficacy was good.

Targeting von Willebrand disease: the current status and future directions of management therapies.

INTRODUCTION: von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the commonest inherited bleeding disorder, and is typically caused by deficits in the quantity or quality of von Willebrand factor (VWF). AREAS COVERED: This review describes the main clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic aspects of VWD, with particular attention to its management. In addition, standard and avant-garde replacement therapies based on the use of VWF are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: The goal of treatment for VWD is to reverse the double hemostatic defect resulting from the abnormal or reduced expression of VWF and the concomitant factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency. Treatment consists of managing any bleeds and both short-term prophylaxis (i.e. for surgery or invasive procedures) and long-term prophylaxis. While desmopressin is suitable for most patients with type 1 VWD, VWF/FVIII concentrates are the treatment of choice for the other types of VWD. Beside plasma-derived VWF/FVIII concentrates, whose safety and efficacy have been demonstrated by several clinical trials, products containing only VWF, obtained by plasma fractionation and recombinant DNA technology, have become available and marketed more recently. The clinical use of these VWF-only products is particularly attractive in the setting of surgery and long-term prophylaxis, such as the prevention of recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding in cases of angiodysplasia.