A regular screening for hepatitis delta virus among chronic hepatitis B carriers improves the diagnostic of this infection and of subsequent cirrhosis development.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of Hepatitis Delta Virus (HDV) is underestimated and the assessment of fibrosis is recommended for this infection. We tested the diagnostic impact of an annual screening for HDV serology in Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBs Ag) chronic carriers and followed the progression of fibrosis in these patients. METHODS: Between January 2014 and October 2021, we annually tested all chronic HBs Ag-positive patients for HDV antibody (HDV Ab). Each HDV Ab positive patient underwent annually repeated elastometry. Patients with detectable HDV RNA levels (group 1) were compared to those with undetectable HDV RNA (group 2). RESULTS: We identified 610 chronic HBs Ag-positive patients, and repeated screening for HDV Ab was performed in 534 patients. Sixty (11%) patients were HDV Ab positive at baseline and were considered as "coinfected". Seven cases of HDV superinfection were diagnosed through repeated screening. In co-infected patients, cirrhosis was initially diagnosed in 12/60 patients and developed in six patients during follow-up. HDV RNA PCR was performed in 57/67 patients and 27 had detectable levels (group 1). Cumulative incidence of cirrhosis at 7 years was 13.8% (95% CI 0-30) in group 1 and 0 (95% CI 0-0) in group 2 (p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: A systematic screening for HDV in chronic HB Ag carriers revealed a high prevalence of HDV Ab. Repeated serological screening enables the diagnosis of superinfections in asymptomatic patients. Regular assessment of fibrosis using elastometry leads to the identification of incidental cirrhosis in patients with detectable HDV RNA.

Determinants of worse liver-related outcome according to HDV infection among HBsAg positive persons living with HIV: Data from the ICONA cohort.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to study hepatitis D virus (HDV) prevalence and risk of progression to severe liver-related events (SLRE) in HBsAg positive people living with HIV (PLWH) in Italy; role of HDV-RNA copy levels, HCV coinfection and nadir CD4 counts were also investigated. METHODS: People living with HIV (PLWH) from Italian Foundation cohort Naïve antiretrovirals (ICONA) with available HBsAg and HDV Ab were enrolled. HBsAg, HDV Ab, HDV-RNA and HDV genotypes were tested. PRIMARY END-POINT: time from first HDV screening to Severe Liver Related Events (SLRE: decompensated cirrhosis, liver transplantation, HCC). Fine-grey regression models were used to evaluate the association of HDV Ab, HDV-RNA, HDV/HCV coinfection, CD4 nadir and outcome. Secondary end-points: time to SLRE or death; HDV Ab and HDV-RNA prevalence. RESULTS: A total of 152/809 (18.8%) HBsAg positive PLWH showed HDV Ab reactivity; 63/93 (67.7%) were HDV-RNA positive. Being male, persons who inject drugs (PWID), HCV Ab positive, with FIB-4 > 3.25 were independent factors of HDV Ab positivity. In a median follow-up of 5 years, 37 PLWH (4.1% at 5-year) developed SLRE and 97 (12.0%) reached the SLRE or death end-point. HDV-RNA positive (independently from HDV-RNA copy level) PLWH had a 4.6-fold (95%CI 2.0-10.5) higher risk of SLRE than HDV negatives. PLWH positive for both HCV Ab and HDV Ab showed the highest independent risk of SLRE (ASHR: 11.9, 95%CI: 4.6-30.9 vs. HCV neg/HDV neg). Nadir CD4 < 200/mL was associated with SLRE (ASHR: 3.9, 95% 1.0-14.5). CONCLUSIONS: One-fifth of the HBsAg positive PLWH harbour HDV infection, and are at high risk of progression to advanced liver disease. HCV contributes to worse outcomes. This population needs urgently effective treatments.

Prevalence of hepatitis D virus infection among patients with chronic hepatitis B infection in a tertiary care centre in Thailand.

Knowledge about the epidemiology of hepatitis D virus (HDV) is essential for effective screening and management. Our study aimed to update the prevalence of HDV infection among patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection at hepatology clinics in Thailand. We enrolled HBV-infected patients from hepatology clinics at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand, between June 2022 and November 2023. Demographic, biochemical characteristics, and liver-related complications (LRC), including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, were reviewed. The competitive enzyme and chemiluminescence immunoassays were used to detect anti-HDV antibodies. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to test for HDV RNA in anti-HDV-positive patients. The HDV genotype was identified in detectable HDV RNA samples. Of the 702 enrolled patients, four (0.6%) had positive and equivocal for both anti-HDV tests. Two (50.0%) of the four patients tested positive for HDV RNA and genotype 1 was identified; one had multiple risk factors. Anti-HDV seroprevalence was not significantly different between patients with and without LRC. In conclusion, HDV co-infection is less common in Thailand than globally. Additionally, our study identified genotype 1, the predominant HDV genotype worldwide, and observed co-infection even without LRC.

Hepatitis D: A Review.

Importance: Hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection occurs in association with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and affects approximately 12 million to 72 million people worldwide. HDV causes more rapid progression to cirrhosis and higher rates of hepatocellular carcinoma than HBV alone or hepatitis C virus. Observations: HDV requires HBV to enter hepatocytes and to assemble and secrete new virions. Acute HDV-HBV coinfection is followed by clearance of both viruses in approximately 95% of people, whereas HDV superinfection in an HBV-infected person results in chronic HDV-HBV infection in more than 90% of infected patients. Chronic hepatitis D causes more rapidly progressive liver disease than HBV alone. Approximately 30% to 70% of patients with chronic hepatitis D have cirrhosis at diagnosis and more than 50% die of liver disease within 10 years of diagnosis. However, recent studies suggested that progression is variable and that more than 50% of people may have an indolent course. Only approximately 20% to 50% of people infected by hepatitis D have been diagnosed due to lack of awareness and limited access to reliable diagnostic tests for the HDV antibody and HDV RNA. The HBV vaccine prevents HDV infection by preventing HBV infection, but no vaccines are available to protect those with established HBV infection against HDV. Interferon alfa inhibits HDV replication and reduces the incidence of liver-related events such as liver decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplant, or mortality from 8.5% per year to 3.3% per year. Adverse effects from interferon alfa such as fatigue, depression, and bone marrow suppression are common. HBV nucleos(t)ide analogues, such as entecavir or tenofovir, are ineffective against HDV. Phase 3 randomized clinical trials of bulevirtide, which blocks entry of HDV into hepatocytes, and lonafarnib, which interferes with HDV assembly, showed that compared with placebo or observation, these therapies attained virological and biochemical response in up to 56% of patients after 96 weeks of bulevirtide monotherapy and 19% after 48 weeks of lonafarnib, ritonavir, and pegylated interferon alfa treatment. Conclusions and Relevance: HDV infection affects approximately 12 million to 72 million people worldwide and is associated with more rapid progression to cirrhosis and liver failure and higher rates of hepatocellular carcinoma than infection with HBV alone. Bulevirtide was recently approved for HDV in Europe, whereas pegylated interferon alfa is the only treatment available in most countries.

Impact of hepatitis D reflex testing on the future disease burden: A modelling analysis.

Chronic hepatitis D (CHD) is a severe form of viral hepatitis that leads to liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. CHD is underdiagnosed, and this study aimed to assess the impact of hepatitis D reflex testing in HBsAg-positive individuals in Spain over the next 8 years. Two scenarios were compared: the current situation (7.6% of HBsAg-positive patients tested for anti-HDV) and reflex testing for all positive samples. A decision tree model was designed to simulate the CHD care cascade. Implementing reflex testing would increase anti-HDV detection to 5498 cases and HDV-RNA to 3225 cases. Additionally, 2128 more patients would receive treatment, with 213 achieving undetectable HDV-RNA levels. The cost per anti-HDV case detected would be €132. In the median time of the analysis, liver complications (decompensated cirrhosis, HCC and liver-related deaths) would be reduced by 35%-38%, implying an estimated cost savings of 36 million euros associated with the management of such complications. By 2030, implementing anti-HDV reflex testing would reduce the clinical and economic burden of CHD by 35%-38%.

Clinical long-term outcome of hepatitis D compared to hepatitis B monoinfection.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection causes the most severe form of chronic viral hepatitis. However, it is still unclear to what extent the underlying cirrhosis may contribute to disease progression. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcome of HDV infection with HBV monoinfection in a single-center cohort of both non-cirrhotic and cirrhotic patients. METHOD: We retrospectively studied 175 patients with chronic hepatitis D (CHD) who were followed for at least 6 months (median of 6.3 (0.6-23.6) years). In addition, we selected 175 patients with HBV monoinfection (CHB) who were matched for gender, age, region of origin, HBeAg status, and bilirubin. Liver-related clinical end points were defined as hepatic decompensation (ascites, encephalopathy, variceal bleeding), liver transplantation, HCC, or liver-related death. RESULTS: Clinical complications developed earlier (4.6 vs. 6.2 years) and more frequently (35.4% vs. 12.6%, p < 0.01) in CHD patients. In a multivariate Cox regression, HDV infection was independently associated with the development of end points (p < 0.01; HR: 3.0; 95% CI 1.4-6.4). However, in cirrhotic patients there were no significant differences between HBV and HDV in the development of end points. Besides, CHB patients with cirrhosis developed more frequently HCC (35.5%) than CHD patients with cirrhosis (18.5%). CONCLUSION: Our results confirmed that HDV leads to a faster progression to cirrhosis compared to HBV. However, once cirrhosis is present, not HDV but the underlying cirrhosis is the dominate intrinsic risk factor for the development of liver-related end points and for the progression to HCC.

Management of hepatitis D in general practice.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis D virus (HDV) requires the presence of hepatitis B virus for replication and infection, and is associated with accelerated progression to cirrhosis and an increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Approximately 4% of Australians living with hepatitis B are infected with HDV, although it is likely that HDV remains underdiagnosed. OBJECTIVE: This paper highlights the importance of screening for HDV in patients living with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and provides an overview of diagnosis and treatment approaches for general practitioners (GPs), with the hope of reducing preventable liver-related morbidity and mortality in people living with CHB and HDV coinfection. DISCUSSION: The diversity of risk factors and geographical origins of patients in the multicultural Australian populace highlights the need for routine testing for HDV in patients diagnosed with CHB. GPs have a pivotal role in the diagnosis of HDV and should, if possible, promptly refer patients to non-GP specialist physicians to consider HDV therapy.

Hepatitis Delta Infection: A Clinical Review.

First discovered over 40 years ago, the hepatitis delta virus (HDV) is a unique RNA virus, requiring hepatitis B virus (HBV) antigens for its assembly, replication, and transmission. HBV and HDV can be acquired at the same time (coinfection) or HDV infection can occur in persons with chronic HBV (superinfection). Screening guidelines for HDV are inconsistent. While some guidelines recommend universal screening for all people with HBV, others recommend risk-based screening. Estimates of the global HDV prevalence range from 4.5 to 14.6% among persons with HBV; thus, there may be up to 72 million individuals with HDV worldwide. HDV is the most severe form of viral hepatitis. Compared to HBV monoinfection, HDV coinfection increases the risk of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic decompensation, mortality, and necessity for liver transplant. Despite the severity of HDV, there are few treatment options. Pegylated interferon (off-label use) has long been the only available treatment, although bulevirtide is conditionally approved in some European countries. There are many potential treatments in development, but as yet, there are few effective and safe therapies for HDV infection. In conclusion, given the severity of HDV disease and the paucity of treatments, there is a great unmet need for HDV therapies.

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on hepatitis delta virus.

Hepatitis D virus (HDV) is a defective virus that requires the hepatitis B virus to complete its life cycle and cause liver damage in humans. HDV is responsible for rare acute and chronic liver diseases and is considered the most aggressive hepatitis virus. Acute infection can cause acute liver failure, while persistent infection typically causes a severe form of chronic hepatitis which is associated with rapid and frequent progression to cirrhosis and its end-stage complications, hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma. Major diagnostic and therapeutic innovations prompted the EASL Governing Board to commission specific Clinical Practice Guidelines on the identification, virologic and clinical characterisation, prognostic assessment, and appropriate clinical and therapeutic management of HDV-infected individuals.

Hepatitis delta infection among persons living with HIV in Europe.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A high prevalence of hepatitis delta virus (HDV) infection, the most severe form of viral hepatitis, has been reported among persons living with HIV (PLWH) in Europe. We analysed data from a large HIV cohort collaboration to characterize HDV epidemiological trends across Europe, as well as its impact on clinical outcomes. METHODS: All PLWH with a positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study and EuroSIDA between 1988 and 2019 were tested for anti-HDV antibodies and, if positive, for HDV RNA. Demographic and clinical characteristics at initiation of antiretroviral therapy were compared between HDV-positive and HDV-negative individuals using descriptive statistics. The associations between HDV infection and overall mortality, liver-related mortality as well as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were assessed using cumulative incidence plots and cause-specific multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: Of 2793 HBsAg-positive participants, 1556 (56%) had stored serum available and were included. The prevalence of HDV coinfection was 15.2% (237/1556, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 13.5%-17.1%) and 66% (132/200) of HDV-positive individuals had active HDV replication. Among persons who inject drugs (PWID), the prevalence of HDV coinfection was 50.5% (182/360, 95% CI: 45.3%-55.7%), with similar estimates across Europe, compared to 4.7% (52/1109, 95% CI: 3.5%-5.9%) among other participants. During a median follow-up of 10.8 years (interquartile range 5.6-17.8), 82 (34.6%) HDV-positive and 265 (20.1%) HDV-negative individuals died. 41.5% (34/82) of deaths were liver-related in HDV-positive individuals compared to 17.7% (47/265) in HDV-negative individuals. HDV infection was associated with overall mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.6; 95% CI 1.2-2.1), liver-related death (2.9, 1.6-5.0) and HCC (6.3, 2.5-16.0). CONCLUSION: We found a very high prevalence of hepatitis delta among PWID across Europe. Among PLWH who do not inject drugs, the prevalence was similar to that reported from populations without HIV. HDV coinfection was associated with liver-related mortality and HCC incidence.

Natural history of untreated HDV patients: Always a progressive disease?

A severe course has been described in early studies on chronic hepatitis D (CHD), with faster pace towards liver cirrhosis with subsequent high liver-related morbidity and mortality in the majority of patients. Earlier studies have included risk groups as people using intravenous drugs (PWID) or those with multiple co-morbidities. During the last decade, the epidemiological landscape of CHD has changed with domestic cases decreasing while increasing cases of CHD consisting of younger persons immigrating from endemic regions to low-endemic regions. Recently, further insights into the spectrum of the disease with an indolent disease course in a substantial proportion of persons with CHD have been gained. At diagnosis, ≥30%-50% had already established liver cirrhosis. Older age, liver cirrhosis, co-infection with HIV and lack of interferon (IFN) therapy are the main predictors of worse clinical outcome. The newly introduced and upcoming antivirals against CHD are highly anticipated, considering the historically low virological response rates to antiviral therapy. Further knowledge is needed to fully comprehend the natural course and the spectrum of this severe form of viral hepatitis. This is also to be able to evaluate the long-term effects of the new antivirals on disease progression.

Treatment of hepatitis delta and HIV infection.

Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) is a defective agent that only infects individuals with hepatitis B virus (HBV). Around 5-10% of chronic hepatitis B patients worldwide are superinfected with HDV, which means 15-25 million people. Hepatitis delta is the most severe of all chronic viral hepatitis, leading to cirrhosis, liver cancer and/or transplantation in most patients. Despite it, many HDV patients remain undiagnosed. The only treatment available until recently was peginterferon alfa, with poor results and significant side effects. The recent approval of bulevirtide, a lipopeptide that blocks HBV/HDV entry, has revolutionized the field. Another drug, lonafarnib, already approved to treat progeria, is expected to be available soon as HDV therapy. Since there is no cell reservoir for the HDV RNA genome, hypothetically viral clearance could be achieved if complete blocking of viral replication occurs for a minimum time frame. This is what happens in hepatitis C using direct-acting antivirals, with the achievement of cure in nearly all treated patients. We envision the cure of hepatitis delta using combination antiviral therapy. Given that sexual and parenteral transmission routes are the most frequent for the acquisition of HBV and HDV, shared with HIV infection and HBV/HDV and HIV coinfection. The clinical outcome of hepatitis delta is worst in the HIV setting, with more frequent liver complications. Since most persons infected with HIV are on regular health care follow-up, we propose that HIV-HDV patients should be prioritized for moving forward new and potentially curative treatments for hepatitis delta.

Seroprevalence and clinical outcome of hepatitis D infection in Qatar.

Background: Worldwide, 5-10% of people with chronic hepatitis B virus infection are co-infected with hepatitis D virus. In Qatar, there are no data on hepatitis D virus infection among patients positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Aims: To determine the seroprevalence of hepatitis D virus infection among patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection in Qatar and assess the characteristics of these patients. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of all HBsAg-positive individuals tested for hepatitis D virus between 1 January 2010 and 29 December 2019 within the Hamad Medical Corporation. Data were retrieved from electronic records and included demographic and clinical information of the patients. Results: Of the 2348 HBsAg-positive patients, 125 were positive for hepatitis D virus (seroprevalence 5.3%). The median age of hepatitis D positive patients was significantly higher than for hepatitis D negative patients (P = 0.001). Most of the patients with hepatitis D had a hepatitis B viral load < 2000 IU/mL (53.6%) and were negative for hepatitis B e antigen (93.6%). A significantly greater proportion of hepatitis D positive patients than hepatitis D negative patients were infected with hepatitis C virus (P < 0.001), and had liver cirrhosis (P < 0.001) and hepatocellular carcinoma (P = 0.006). Conclusions: Hepatitis D virus infection is associated with lower hepatitis B virus viraemia and more advanced liver disease in the study population.

Bulevirtide monotherapy for 48 weeks in patients with HDV-related compensated cirrhosis and clinically significant portal hypertension.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Bulevirtide (BLV) has recently been conditionally approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis delta (CHD) in Europe, but its effectiveness and safety in patients with compensated cirrhosis and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) are unknown. METHODS: Consecutive patients with HDV-related compensated cirrhosis and CSPH who started BLV 2 mg/day were enrolled in this single-center study. Clinical/virological characteristics were collected at baseline, weeks 4, 8 and every 8 weeks thereafter. HDV RNA was quantified by Robogene 2.0 (lower limit of detection 6 IU/ml). RESULTS: Eighteen Caucasian patients with compensated cirrhosis and CSPH under nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment were enrolled: median (IQR) age was 48 (29-77) years, and 67% were male. Median (IQR) platelet count was 70 (37-227) x103/µl, liver stiffness measurement (LSM) 16.4 (7.8-57.8) kPa, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 106 (32-222) U/L, HBsAg 3.7 (2.5-4.3) log IU/ml, HDV RNA 4.9 (3.3-6.6) log IU/ml. During 48 weeks of BLV monotherapy, HDV RNA declined by 3.1 (0.2-4.3) log IU/ml (p <0.001 vs. baseline), becoming undetectable in 5 patients (23%). A virological response was observed in 14 (78%) patients while a non-response was observed in 2 (11%). ALT decreased to 35 (15-86) U/L (p <0.001 vs. baseline), normalizing in 83% of patients. A combined response was observed in 67% of patients. Aspartate aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyltransferase levels significantly improved. Concerning liver function parameters, albumin values significantly increased and bilirubin remained stable. LSM significantly improved in patients with virological response, while platelet count was unchanged. None of the patients developed decompensating events or hepatocellular carcinoma. BLV was well tolerated, no patient discontinued treatment and the increase in bile acids was fully asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: A 48-week course of BLV 2 mg/day monotherapy is safe and effective even for difficult-to treat patients with HDV-related compensated cirrhosis and CSPH. LAY SUMMARY: Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) is associated with the most severe form of viral hepatitis. A new treatment for HDV called bulevirtide has recently received conditional approval for patients with chronic HDV infection. However, its safety and effectiveness in patients with more advanced liver disease is not known. Herein, we show that it is safe and effective in patients with HDV-related cirrhosis and clinically significant portal hypertension.

Entry Inhibitors of Hepatitis B and D Viruses.

Human hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis D virus (HDV) cause acute and chronic infections. The latter poses a serious public health threat as it is the major cause of chronic hepatitis, liver failure, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In nature, HBV and HDV have a narrow host range and highly hepatotropic, only infecting the hepatocytes of humans and a few primates. The elucidation of cell entry mechanism by HBV has made great progress in recent years, which strongly promotes the establishment of new HBV infection models and the development of viral entry inhibitors. The study of HBV entry inhibitors has culminated in the first direct antiviral treatment for HDV. This review provides a concise introduction on the progress of HBV/HDV entry inhibitors in the recent years.

The power of kindness: curative treatment with metronomic combination in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

The administration of approved systemic treatments for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is limited to patients with preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A/B7) and performance status. Conversely, metronomic chemotherapy can be safely administered to patients with poor clinical conditions and severe liver impairment. The metronomic schedule demonstrated to exert different anticancer mechanisms compared to that of the same agent administered at its standard schedule, including immune stimulation and the inhibition of angiogenesis and vasculogenesis. Nevertheless, metronomic chemotherapy is a nearly neglected option for the treatment of advanced HCC patients, even among those who cannot afford standard treatments. Herein, we report the case of a 40-year-old patient affected by HBV-HDV-related cirrhosis who was diagnosed with advanced HCC. The severe liver impairment (Child-Pugh B9) did not allow to administer first-line treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors so that the patient received metronomic capecitabine as upfront therapy. Due to the suspect of progressive disease at the first radiologic assessment, metronomic cyclophosphamide was added to capecitabine aiming to enhance its efficacy. After 4 months of treatment, complete tumor response, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) normalization and the recovery of a Child-Pugh A were achieved. The patient was then able to undergo liver transplantation, and, after 18 months from the diagnosis, he is still free of disease recurrence. This experience emphasizes the reliability of metronomic capecitabine as a well-tolerated and effective treatment when patient's conditions prevent the administration of standard first-line treatments. In fact, metronomic capecitabine demonstrated its effectiveness in advanced HCC in retrospective and prospective analyses, leading to median progression-free survival and overall survival of, respectively, 6.03 and 14.47 months in phase II single-arm trial. Moreover, in consideration of the raising interest in immune-checkpoint inhibition in HCC, we believe that the immunomodulating effects of metronomic chemotherapy, either capecitabine or cyclophosphamide, warrant future trials exploring its combination with immunotherapy.

[Delta hepatitis: Epidemiology, diagnostic, natural history and treatment]. / Hépatite Delta : épidémiologie, diagnostic, histoire naturelle et traitements.

Hepatitis B virus is a small enveloped RNA virus, which replicates independently but requires the hepatitis B virus (HBV) to provide the envelope proteins necessary for the assembly of its own viral particles. Approximately 5% of chronic hepatitis B virus carriers are infected with HDV. HBV vaccination remains the best preventive treatment for HDV. All HBV patients should be screened for HDV (anti-HDV serology). In case of positive HDV serology, HDV replication (HDV RNA) should be investigated using a sensitive and specific technique. Hepatitis Delta is often complicated by cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). For this reason, every patient with Delta cirrhosis should be screened for HCC by abdominal ultrasound every 6 months. The historical treatment was based on PEG-IFN with many side effects. A new treatment has been approved, Bulevirtide (Hepcludex®) an HDV/HBV entry inhibitor, for any patient with chronic hepatitis Delta infection (CHD) with active replication (except in decompensated cirrhosis), at a dose of 2mg/day by subcutaneous injection. The exact duration on-treatment is unknown, thus treatment should be continued if clinical benefit is observed.

Hepatitis B/D-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma. A Clinical Literature Review.

AIM: Given the current literature data, this article aims to shed light on the epidemiological and clinical effects of HBV, as well as its impact on the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: A review of the English language literature based on a MEDLINE (PubMed) database was searched. The keywords were cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, epidemiology, hepatitis delta virus, hepatitis B virus, and co-infection. All references from retrieved papers were reviewed systematically to find additional collection of reports. RESULTS: The study has broadly confirmed the contribution of HDV viremia to liver disease and cirrhosis. However, uncertainty over the mechanism of action on HCC development remains. As the recent data has demonstrated, the HCC-HDV has a unique molecular profile which is distinct from that of HBV-HCC. CONCLUSION: Owing to the dependence of HDV on HBV, it is not clear whether HCC is a consequence of the cumulative effect of both HBV and HDV, an effect of the underlying cirrhosis, or a direct oncogenic effect of HDV. Many questions concerning the oncogenic role of HDV remain unanswered. To better understand the role of HDV in carcinogenesis, studies at the molecular level that consider genotype differences should be increased. Multicenter, high-volume, and prospective studies that compare HBV/HDV co-infected and HBV-infected individuals will be pivotal in determining the oncogenic role of HDV.

Cell Culture Models for the Study of Hepatitis D Virus Entry and Infection.

Chronic hepatitis D is one of the most severe and aggressive forms of chronic viral hepatitis with a high risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It results from the co-infection of the liver with the hepatitis B virus (HBV) and its satellite, the hepatitis D virus (HDV). Although current therapies can control HBV infection, no treatment that efficiently eliminates HDV is available and novel therapeutic strategies are needed. Although the HDV cycle is well described, the lack of simple experimental models has restricted the study of host-virus interactions, even if they represent relevant therapeutic targets. In the last few years, the discovery of the sodium taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide (NTCP) as a key cellular entry factor for HBV and HDV has allowed the development of new cell culture models susceptible to HBV and HDV infection. In this review, we summarize the main in vitro model systems used for the study of HDV entry and infection, discuss their benefits and limitations and highlight perspectives for future developments.

Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatitis B and D virus co-infected patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.

Hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection causes a severe chronic viral hepatitis with accelerated development of liver cirrhosis and decompensation, but whether it further increases the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unclear. We performed a comprehensive systematic review of the published literature and meta-analysis to assess the risk of HCC in HDV and hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infected, compared to HBV mono-infected patients. The study was conducted per a priori defined protocol, including only longitudinal studies, thus excluding cross-sectional studies. Random-effects models were used to determine aggregate effect sizes (ES) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Meta-regression was used to examine the associations among study level characteristics. Twelve cohort studies comprising a total of 6099 HBV/HDV co-infected and 57,620 chronic HBV mono-infected patients were analysed. The overall pooled ES showed that HBV/HDV co-infected patients were at 2-fold increased risk of HCC compared to HBV mono-infected patients (ES = 2.12, 95% CI 1.14-3.95, I2  = 72%, N = 12). A six-fold significant increased risk of HCC was noted among HIV/HBV/HDV triple-infected, compared to HIV/HBV co-infected patients. The magnitude of ES did not differ significantly after adjustment for study design and quality, publication year and follow-up duration in univariable meta-regression analysis. This systematic review and meta-analysis shows that infection with HDV is associated with a 2-fold higher risk of HCC development compared to HBV mono-infection. HCC surveillance strategies taking this increased risk into account, and new treatment options against HDV, are warranted.