RICTOR amplification is associated with Rictor membrane staining and does not correlate with PD-L1 expression in lung squamous cell carcinoma.

RICTOR gene, which encodes the scaffold protein of mTORC2, can be amplified in various tumor types, including squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the lung. RICTOR amplification can lead to hyperactivation of mTORC2 and may serve as a targetable genetic alteration, including in lung SCC patients with no PD-L1 expression who are not expected to benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. This study aimed to compare RICTOR amplification detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with Rictor and PD-L1 protein expression detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in SCC of the lung. The study was complemented by analysis of the publicly available Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma (TCGA, Firehose legacy) dataset. RICTOR amplification was observed in 20% of our cases and 16% of the lung SCC cases of the TCGA dataset. Rictor and PD-L1 expression was seen in 74% and 44% of the cases, respectively. Rictor IHC showed two staining patterns: membrane staining (16% of the cases) and cytoplasmic staining (58% of the cases). Rictor membrane staining predicted RICTOR amplification as detected by FISH with high specificity (95%) and sensitivity (70%). We did not find any correlation between RICTOR amplification and PD-L1 expression; RICTOR amplification was detected in 18% and 26% of PD-L1 positive and negative cases, respectively. The TCGA dataset analysis showed similar results; RICTOR copy number correlated with Rictor mRNA and protein expression but showed no association with PD-L1 mRNA and protein expression. In conclusion, the correlation between RICTOR amplification and Rictor membrane staining suggests that the latter can potentially be used as a surrogate marker to identify lung SCC cases with RICTOR amplification. Since a significant proportion of PD-L1 negative SCC cases harbor RICTOR amplification, analyzing PD-L1 negative tumors by RICTOR FISH or Rictor IHC can help select patients who may benefit from mTORC2 inhibitor therapy.

[Detection of EWSR1 gene rearrangement by fluorescence in situ hybridization in bone and soft tissue tumors: clinical application evaluation and atypical signal analysis].

Objective: To investigate the clinical application of EWSR1 gene rearrangement by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in bone and soft tissue tumors and to analyze the cases with atypical signal pattern. Methods: The cases detected for EWSR1 gene rearrangement by FISH in Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University from 2014 to 2021 were collected, and the value of detecting EWSR1 gene rearrangement for diagnosing bone and soft tissue tumors was analyzed. The cases with atypical positive signals were further analyzed by next generation sequencing (NGS). Results: FISH using EWSR1 break-apart probe kit was successfully performed in 97% (205/211) of cases, 6 cases failed. Four of the 6 failures were due to improper decalcification, 1 case due to signal overlap caused by thick slices, and 1 case due to signal amplification and disorder. EWSR1 gene rearrangements were positive in 122 cases (122/205, 59%), atypical positive signal in 8 cases (8/205, 4%), and negative in 75 cases (75/205, 37%). In cases testing positive, the percentage of positive cells ranged from 34% to 98%, with 120 cases (120/122, 98%) showing a positive cell percentage greater than 50%. Among the 205 successfully tested cases, 156 cases were histologically diagnosed as Ewing's sarcoma, of which 110 were positive (110/156, 71%), 7 were atypical positive (7/156, 4%), and 39 were negative (39/156, 25%). Nine cases were histologically diagnosed as clear cell sarcoma of soft tissue, of which 6 were positive (6/9), 1 was atypical positive (1/9), and 2 were negative (2/9). Five cases were histologically diagnosed as extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma, of which 2 were positive (2/5) and 3 were negative (3/5). Three cases were histologically diagnosed as angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma, of which 2 were positive (2/3) and 1 was negative (1/3). Two cases were histologically diagnosed as myoepithelioma of soft tissue, of which 1 was positive (1/2) and 1 was negative (1/2). One case was histologically diagnosed as olfactory neuroblastoma with a positive result. The 29 other tumor cases including osteosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, and malignant melanoma and others were all negative. Basing on histology as the standard for diagnosis and considering atypical positive cases as negative, comparing with the 29 cases of other tumors as control group, the sensitivity for diagnosing Ewing's sarcoma through the detection of EWSR1 gene rearrangement was 71%, and the specificity was 100%; the sensitivity for diagnosing clear cell sarcoma of soft tissue was 67%, and the specificity was 100%; the sensitivity for diagnosing extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma was 40%, and the specificity was 100%; the sensitivity for diagnosing angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma was 67%, and the specificity was 100%; the sensitivity for diagnosing myoepithelioma of soft tissue was 50%, and the specificity was 100%; the sensitivity for diagnosing olfactory neuroblastoma was 100%, and the specificity was 100%. Four of 8 cases with atypical positive signals analyzed by NGS showed EWSR1 rearrangement, including EWSR1::FLI1 in one case of Ewing sarcoma, EWSR1::NFATC2 in one case of EWSR1::NFATC2-rearranged sarcoma, EWSR1::ATF1 in one case of clear cell sarcoma of soft tissue and EWSR1::NR4A3 in one case of extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma. Conclusions: Detection of EWSR1 rearrangement by FISH is of utmost significance in the diagnosis of bone and soft tissue tumors. Cases with atypical positive signals should be further scrutinized, correlating with their histomorphology and verifying by NGS if necessary.

DBD-FISH Using Specific Chromosomal Region Probes for the Study of Cervical Carcinoma Progression.

Genomic instability is an important biomarker in the progression of cervical carcinoma. DBD-FISH (DNA breakage detection-fluorescence in situ hybridization) is a sensitive method that detects strand breaks, alkali-labile sites, and incomplete DNA excision repair in cells of the cervical epithelium. This technique integrates the microgel immersion of cells from a vaginal lesion scraping and the DNA unwinding treatment with the capacity of FISH integrated into digital image analysis. Cells captured within an agarose matrix are lysed and submerged in an alkaline unwinding solution that generates single-stranded DNA motifs at the ends of internal DNA strand breaks. After neutralization, the microgel is dehydrated and the cells are incubated with DNA-labeled probes. The quantity of a hybridized probe at a target sequence corresponds to the measure of the single-stranded DNA produced during the unwinding step, which is equivalent to the degree of local DNA breakage. DNA damage does not show uniformly throughout the entire DNA of a cell; rather, it is confined to specific chromosomal sites. In this chapter, an overview of the technique is supplied, focusing on its ability for assessing the association between DNA damage in specific sequences and in the progressive stages of cervical carcinoma.

3D Super-Resolution Nuclear Q-FISH Imaging Reveals Cell-Cycle-Related Telomere Changes.

We present novel workflows for Q-FISH nanoscopy with the potential for prognostic applications and resolving novel chromatin compaction changes. DNA-fluorescence in situ hybridization (DNA-FISH) is a routine application to visualize telomeres, repetitive terminal DNA sequences, in cells and tissues. Telomere attrition is associated with inherited and acquired diseases, including cancer and cardiomyopathies, and is frequently analyzed by quantitative (Q)-FISH microscopy. Recently, nanoscopic imaging techniques have resolved individual telomere dimensions and their compaction as a prognostic marker, in part leading to conflicting conclusions still unresolved to date. Here, we developed a comprehensive Q-FISH nanoscopy workflow to assess telomeres with PNA telomere probes and 3D-Stimulated Emission Depletion (STED) microscopy combined with Dynamic Intensity Minimum (DyMIN) scanning. We achieved single-telomere resolution at high, unprecedented telomere coverage. Importantly, our approach revealed a decrease in telomere signal density during mitotic cell division compared to interphase. Innovatively expanding FISH-STED applications, we conducted double FISH targeting of both telomere- and chromosome-specific sub-telomeric regions and accomplished FISH-STED in human cardiac biopsies. In summary, this work further advanced Q-FISH nanoscopy, detected a new aspect of telomere compaction related to the cell cycle, and laid the groundwork for future applications in complex cell types such as post-mitotic neurons and muscle cells.

HER2-low and Overexpression in Mucinous Ovarian Cancer: Analysis of ASCO/CAP and ToGA Immunohistochemical Scoring.

Mucinous ovarian carcinoma is an uncommon malignancy characterized by resistance to chemotherapy and poor survival in the metastatic setting. HER2 amplification is a frequent late event in carcinogenesis, yet the incidence of HER2-low in mucinous ovarian carcinoma is unknown. Further, the optimal method for determining overexpression in these tumors is not established. We sought to assess the ASCO/CAP and ToGA trial scoring methods for HER2 IHC with correlation to FISH, p53, and mismatch repair protein status and to determine the incidence of HER2-low in mucinous ovarian carcinoma. A total of 29 tumors from 23 patients were included. Immunohistochemistry for HER2, p53, MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6 was performed. Scoring was performed according to the ASCO/CAP and ToGA trial criteria. HER2 FISH was performed and scored according to the ASCO/CAP criteria. The proportion of HER2-low, defined as 1+ or 2+ staining with negative FISH, was determined. Using ASCO/CAP, 26% demonstrated 3+ while 35% demonstrated 2+ staining. Using ToGA, 30% demonstrated 3+ while 57% demonstrated 2+ staining. By FISH, 26% were positive for HER2 amplification. Both systems captured all FISH-positive cases; the use of ASCO/CAP resulted in fewer equivocal and false-positive cases. Among HER2-negative cases, 88% were HER2-low. Aberrant p53 expression was detected in 55% of cases; mismatch repair deficiency was not identified in any cases. ASCO/CAP guidelines are accurate and resource-effective in determining HER2 overexpression in mucinous ovarian carcinoma. HER2-low is common in these tumors; further studies to determine the role of HER2-targeted therapy including antibody-drug conjugates are indicated.

Multicenter evaluation of an automated, multiplex, RNA-based molecular assay for detection of ALK, ROS1, RET fusions and MET exon 14 skipping in NSCLC.

The current study assessed the performance of the fully automated RT-PCR-based Idylla™ GeneFusion Assay, which simultaneously covers the advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (aNSCLC) actionable ALK, ROS1, RET, and MET exon 14 rearrangements, in a routine clinical setting involving 12 European clinical centers. The Idylla™ GeneFusion Assay detects fusions using fusion-specific as well as expression imbalance detection, the latter enabling detection of uncommon fusions not covered by fusion-specific assays. In total, 326 archival aNSCLC formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples were included of which 44% were resected specimen, 46% tissue biopsies, and 9% cytological specimen. With a total of 179 biomarker-positive cases (i.e., 85 ALK, 33 ROS1, 20 RET fusions and 41 MET exon 14 skipping), this is one of the largest fusion-positive datasets ever tested. The results of the Idylla™ GeneFusion Assay were compared with earlier results of routine reference technologies including fluorescence in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, and next-generation sequencing, establishing a high sensitivity/specificity of 96.1%/99.6% for ALK, 96.7%/99.0% for ROS1, 100%/99.3% for RET fusion, and 92.5%/99.6% for MET exon 14 skipping, and a low failure rate (0.9%). The Idylla™ GeneFusion Assay was found to be a reliable, sensitive, and specific tool for routine detection of ALK, ROS1, RET fusions and MET exon 14 skipping. Given its short turnaround time of about 3 h, it is a time-efficient upfront screening tool in FFPE samples, supporting rapid clinical decision making. Moreover, expression-imbalance-based detection of potentially novel fusions may be easily verified with other routine technologies without delaying treatment initiation.

Reliably making the primary diagnosis of mesothelioma utilizing serous fluid cytology specimens: an institutional experience.

INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis of mesothelioma has historically been challenging, especially on serous fluid cytology (SFC). Distinguishing between reactive and neoplastic mesothelial cells can be difficult on cytomorphology alone. However, additional ancillary tests, such as BRCA1 associated protein-1 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization for cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A deletion, can provide a sensitive and highly specific method of proving malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: SFC specimens diagnosed as mesothelioma, suspicious for mesothelioma (SM), and atypical mesothelial cells (AMCs) since 2012 were identified by querying the laboratory information system. Clinical data and pathologic parameters were gathered. RESULTS: One hundred ten cases of mesothelioma, SM, and AMC were identified. Of these, 61 cases had a definitive diagnosis of mesothelioma on SFC. Average age at SFC diagnosis was 67 years (26-87 years), with most patients being male (67%). Out of the 61 cases, 11 cases (18%) had an initial diagnosis of mesothelioma made on SFC specimens, with 5 of these 11 cases being in patients that never received a histologic diagnosis of mesothelioma. Ancillary studies were utilized in all 11 cases. An initial diagnosis of metastatic mesothelioma was made on SFC in 9 cases (15%). For 6 of these 9 cases, the SFC diagnosis was the sole diagnosis of metastatic mesothelioma without a companion histologic diagnosis. In addition, 15 cases were diagnosed as SM, with 11 of these cases following a definitive mesothelioma diagnosis. Thirty-four cases were diagnosed as AMC, with 27 cases following a definitive mesothelioma diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of mesothelioma can be reliably made on SFC with the appropriate cytomorphology criteria and/or confirmatory ancillary testing.

Enhancing Specific Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization with Quantum Dots for Single-Molecule RNA Imaging in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tumor Tissues.

Single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization (smFISH) represents a promising approach for the quantitative analysis of nucleic acid biomarkers in clinical tissue samples. However, low signal intensity and high background noise are complications that arise from diagnostic pathology when performed with smFISH-based RNA imaging in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue specimens. Moreover, the associated complex procedures can produce uncertain results and poor image quality. Herein, by combining the high specificity of split DNA probes with the high signal readout of ZnCdSe/ZnS quantum dot (QD) labeling, we introduce QD split-FISH, a high-brightness smFISH technology, to quantify the expression of mRNA in both cell lines and clinical FFPE tissue samples of breast cancer and lung squamous carcinoma. Owing to its high signal-to-noise ratio, QD split-FISH is a fast, inexpensive, and sensitive method for quantifying mRNA expression in FFPE tumor tissues, making it suitable for biomarker imaging and diagnostic pathology.

Lanthanide Complex for Single-Molecule Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization and Background-Free Imaging.

Traditional single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization (smFISH) methods for RNA detection often face sensitivity challenges due to the low fluorescence intensity of the probe. Also, short-lived autofluorescence complicates obtaining clear signals from tissue sections. In response, we have developed an smFISH probe using highly grafted lanthanide complexes to address both concentration quenching and autofluorescence background. Our approach involves an oligo PCR incorporating azide-dUTP, enabling conjugation with lanthanide complexes. This method has proven to be stable, convenient, and cost-effective. Notably, for the mRNA detection in SKBR3 cells, the lanthanide probe group exhibited 2.5 times higher luminescence intensity and detected 3 times more signal points in cells compared with the Cy3 group. Furthermore, we successfully applied the probe to image HER2 mRNA molecules in breast cancer FFPE tissue sections, achieving a 2.7-fold improvement in sensitivity compared to Cy3-based probes. These results emphasize the potential of time-resolved smFISH as a highly sensitive method for nucleic acid detection, free of background fluorescence interference.

Highly sensitive spatial transcriptomics using FISHnCHIPs of multiple co-expressed genes.

High-dimensional, spatially resolved analysis of intact tissue samples promises to transform biomedical research and diagnostics, but existing spatial omics technologies are costly and labor-intensive. We present Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization of Cellular HeterogeneIty and gene expression Programs (FISHnCHIPs) for highly sensitive in situ profiling of cell types and gene expression programs. FISHnCHIPs achieves this by simultaneously imaging ~2-35 co-expressed genes (clustered into modules) that are spatially co-localized in tissues, resulting in similar spatial information as single-gene Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH), but with ~2-20-fold higher sensitivity. Using FISHnCHIPs, we image up to 53 modules from the mouse kidney and mouse brain, and demonstrate high-speed, large field-of-view profiling of a whole tissue section. FISHnCHIPs also reveals spatially restricted localizations of cancer-associated fibroblasts in a human colorectal cancer biopsy. Overall, FISHnCHIPs enables fast, robust, and scalable cell typing of tissues with normal physiology or undergoing pathogenesis.

A nomogram based on TFE3 IHC results and clinical factors as a preliminary screening scheme for TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: TFE3 immunohistochemistry (TFE3-IHC) is controversial in the diagnosis of TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma (TFE3-rearranged RCC). This study is to investigate the accuracy and sensitivity of IHC and establish a predictive model to diagnose TFE3-rearranged RCC. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed by collecting IHC and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results from 228 patients. IHC results were evaluated using three scoring systems. Scoring system 1 is graded based on nuclear staining intensity, scoring system 2 is graded based on the percentage of stained tumor cell nuclei, and scoring system 3 is graded based on both the nuclear staining intensity and the percentage. We collected patients' IHC results and clinical information. Important variables were screened based on univariate logistic regression analysis. Then, independent risk factors were established through multivariate logistic regression, and a nomogram model was constructed. The model was validated in internal test set and external validation set. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were generated to assess discriminative ability of the model. RESULTS: The accuracy of IHC based on three scoring systems were 0.829, 0.772, and 0.807, respectively. The model included four factors including age, gender, lymph node metastasis and IHC results. Area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.935 for the training set, 0.934 for the internal test set, 0.933 for all 228 patients, and 0.916 for the external validation set. CONCLUSIONS: TFE3 IHC has high accuracy in the diagnosis of TFE3-rearranged RCC. Clinical information such as age and lymph node metastasis are independent risk factors, which can be used as a supplement to the results of TFE3 IHC. This study confirms the value of IHC in the diagnosis of TFE3-rearranged RCC. The accuracy of the diagnosis can be improved by incorporating IHC with other clinical risk factors.

Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Low Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: An Opportunity for Targeted Systemic Therapies in a High-Need Patient Population.

PURPOSE: Trastuzumab deruxtecan is a new treatment option for patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer (BC). Although HER2-low status has been characterized in early and advanced BC, it has yet to be fully characterized in brain metastases (BrM). METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for BC BrM at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and for whom HER2 status was available on resected BrM were studied. Estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 status were assessed on the basis of ASCO/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines. HER2-zero was defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) 0; HER2-low was defined as IHC 1+ or IHC 2+ with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-negative status. HER2-positive (HER2+) was defined as IHC 3+ or IHC 2+ with positive FISH. Clinicopathologic features were recorded. We also assessed the prognostic association between extent of HER2 expression and (1) brain-specific progression-free survival (bsPFS), as well as (2) overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In this retrospective cohort of 102 patients with resected BC BrM, 53% (n = 54) were HER2+, 29.4% (n = 30) were HER2-low, and 17.6% (n = 18) had HER2-zero status. Among BrM that were triple-negative on the basis of ASCO/CAP guidelines, 63.6% (n = 14/22) were reclassified as being HER2-low. Sixty percent (n = 15/25) of BrM that were hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) were reclassified as being HER2-low. In total, 51 patients had matched primary breast and BrM tissue available; results of HER2 status when categorized as HER2-zero, HER2-low, and HER2+ were concordant in 82.3% (n = 42/51) of cases (Cohen's kappa, 0.58; P = .07). There was no significant association between HER2-zero, HER2-low, and HER2+ status in BrM and either bsPFS or OS. CONCLUSION: Among patients with surgically resected BrM, a high proportion of those with metastatic triple-negative BC and HR+/HER2- disease have HER2-low BrM with potential to benefit from HER2-targeted therapy.

Section E6.7-6.12 of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) Technical Laboratory Standards: Cytogenomic studies of acquired chromosomal abnormalities in solid tumors.

Clinical cytogenomic studies of solid tumor samples are critical to the diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment selection for cancer patients. An overview of current cytogenomic techniques for solid tumor analysis is provided, including standards for sample preparation, clinical and technical considerations, and documentation of results. With the evolving technologies and their application in solid tumor analysis, these standards now include sequencing technology and optical genome mapping, in addition to the conventional cytogenomic methods, such as G-banded chromosome analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and chromosomal microarray analysis. This updated Section E6.7-6.12 supersedes the previous Section E6.5-6.8 in Section E: Clinical Cytogenetics of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Standards for Clinical Genetics Laboratories.

A custom next-generation sequencing panel for 1p/19q codeletion and mutational analysis in gliomas.

The World Health Organization has updated their classification system for the diagnosis of gliomas, combining histological features with molecular data including isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q. 1p/19q codeletion analysis is commonly performed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). In this study, we developed a 57-gene targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel including 1p/19q codeletion detection mainly to assess diagnosis and potential treatment response in melanoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, and glioma patients. Loss of heterozygosity analysis was performed using the NGS method on 37 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded glioma tissues that showed 1p and/or 19q loss determined by FISH. Conventional methods were applied for the validation of some glioma-related gene mutations. In 81.1% (30 of 37) and 94.6% (35 of 37) of cases, 1p and 19q were found to be in agreement whereas concordance for 1p/19q codeletion and no 1p/19q codeletion was found in 94.7% (18 of 19) and 94.4% (17 of 18) of cases, respectively. Overall, comparing NGS results with those of conventional methods showed high concordance. In conclusion, the NGS panel allows reliable analysis of 1p/19q codeletion and mutation at the same time.

Clinical application of the HM-1000 image processing for HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization signal quantification in breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Accurate quantification of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene amplification is important for predicting treatment response and prognosis in patients with breast cancer. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of HER2 status, particularly in cases with equivocal status on immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining, but has some limitations of non-classical amplifications and such cases are diagnosed basing on additional IHC and FISH. This study investigated the clinical utility of a novel super-resolution fluorescence microscopy technique for the better FISH signal visualization and HER2 FISH classification. METHODS: Fourteen breast cancer tissue samples were retrospectively collected between September 2018 and February 2022, and FISH HER2 signal quantification was evaluated by determining the HER2/chromosome 17 centromere (CEP17) ratio and the number of HER2 signals per nucleus in super- versus conventional-resolution images. RESULTS: Super-resolution images maintained the same overall HER2 diagnosis from routine, but HER2 FISH amplification changed negative to monosomy in two cases. Two Letrozole non-response relapses coincided to monosomy samples. The median number of HER2 signals per nucleus was 7.5 in super-resolution images and 4.0 in conventional-resolution images in HER2-positive samples and 2.8 and 2.1 signals per nucleus, respectively, in HER2-negative samples. CONCLUSIONS: Super-resolution images improved signal visualization, including a significant difference in the number of countable HER2 and CEP17 signals in a single nucleus compared with conventional-resolution images. Increased accuracy of signal quantification by super-resolution microscopy may provide clinicians with more detailed information regarding HER2 FISH status that allows to better FISH classification such as HER2-low samples.

Fluorescent in situ hybridization has limitations in screening NRG1 gene rearrangements.

BACKGROUND: NRG1 fusion is a promising therapeutic target for various tumors but its prevalence is extremely low, and there are no standardized testing algorithms for genetic assessment. MOTHODS: In this study, we analyzed 3008 tumors using Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) to screen for NRG1 translocation and p-HER3 expression. RESULTS: Our results demonstrated no cases with p-HER3 positivity through IHC. Nonetheless, 29 cases (0.96%) were identified positive for NRG1 translocation through FISH, with three different signal types. FISH-positive cases were subsequently subjected to next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing. However, only eight of these cases were confirmed with NRG1 fusion through NGS. Notably, we divided FISH into three types and FISH type C group was consistent with NGS results. All NGS NRG1 fusion tumors were adenocarcinomas, with a higher prevalence in females. Our findings indicate that although FISH has limitations in screening NRG1 gene rearrangements, NRG1 fusions can be reliably detected with signals exhibiting low copy numbers of the 5'-end of the gene and no fusion signals. CONCLUSION: Considering the high cost of NGS, FISH remains a useful method for screening NRG1 fusions in various types of tumors. This study provides valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms of NRG1 fusion and identifies potential treatment targets for patients suffering from this disease.

Chromosomal defects in multiple myeloma.

Multiple myeloma is a plasma cell neoplasm driven by primary (e.g. hyperdiploidy; IGH translocations) and secondary (e.g. 1q21 gains/amplifications; del(17p); MYC translocations) chromosomal events. These are important to detect as they influence prognosis, therapeutic response and disease survival. Currently, cytogenetic testing is most commonly performed by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) on aspirated bone marrow samples. A number of variations to FISH methodology are available, including prior plasma cell enrichment and incorporation of immunophenotypic plasma cell identification. Other molecular methods are increasingly being utilised to provide a genome-wide view at high resolution (e.g. single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarray analysis) and these can detect abnormalities in most cases. Despite their wide application at diagnostic assessment, both FISH and SNP-array have relatively low sensitivity, limiting their use for identification of prognostically significant low-level sub-clones or for disease monitoring. Next-generation sequencing is increasingly being used to detect mutations and new FISH techniques such as by flow cytometry are in development and may address some of the current test limitations. Here we review the primary and secondary cytogenetic aberrations in myeloma and discuss the range of techniques available for their assessment.

Practical Considerations for Oncogenic Fusion Detection and Reporting in Solid Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Chromosomal rearrangements that result in oncogenic fusions can hold tremendous clinical significance in solid tumors, often with diagnostic or treatment implications. CONTENT: Traditionally, low-throughput methods such as fluorescence in situ hybridization were used to identify fusions in the clinical laboratory. With the rise of next-generation sequencing techniques and the broad adoption of comprehensive genomic profiling, the practice of screening for fusions as part of an oncologic workup has evolved. RNA sequencing methods are increasingly used, as these comprehensive high-throughput assays have many advantages over traditional techniques. Several RNA sequencing platforms are available, each with benefits and drawbacks. Regardless of the approach, systematic evaluation of the RNA sequencing results and the fusions identified by the assay should be performed. Assessment of fusion events relies upon evaluation of quality evidence, structural evidence, and functional evidence to ensure accurate fusion reporting and interpretation. SUMMARY: Given the clinical significance of gene fusions in oncology, understanding the variety of assays available for fusion detection, their benefits and drawbacks, and how they are used in the identification and interpretation of gene fusions is important for the modern precision oncology practice.

Intra-Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Benign Lipomatous Tumors-An Extremely Rare Mimic of Liposarcoma and its Diagnostic Challenge.

Background. Lipomas are common superficial soft tissue tumors of mature adipocytes. In contrast, well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma typically presents in the retroperitoneum as large masses. We provide clinicopathologic and follow-up details of 9 retroperitoneal/intra-abdominal benign lipomatous tumors (BLT) and discuss the utility of ancillary fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in distinguishing from their malignant counterparts. Design. Clinicopathologic details and histology of 9 intra-abdominal and retroperitoneal lipomas were studied along with ancillary CD10 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and FISH for MDM2 and CDK4 amplification. Results. There were 6 females and 3 males. Median age at diagnosis was 52 years (range 36-81 years). Seven were identified incidentally and 2 presented with primary complaints. On imaging, 7 were considered suspicious for liposarcoma. Grossly, the tumors ranged from 3.4 to 41.2 cm (median 16.5 cm). Histologically, all cases showed well-differentiated BLT, further classified as lipoma (n = 7; 1 with metaplastic ossification, 2 with prominent vessels, and 4 ordinary lipomas) and lipoma-like hibernoma (n = 2)-the latter 2 showed intramuscular lesions with interspersed brown fat. CD10 IHC showed strong staining in the 2 hibernomas, whereas the staining was weak in the remaining. MDM2 and CDK4 amplification were negative by FISH in all. Follow-up (median 18 months) did not show recurrence on clinical or imaging evaluation. Conclusion. Retroperitoneal/intra-abdominal BLT are extremely rare and are indistinguishable clinically and radiographically from liposarcoma. This necessitates molecular confirmation even when the histology is convincingly benign, for a confident diagnosis. Our cohort shows that conservative excision without removal of abutted organs is sufficient in most cases.

Fish: A Promising Screening Tool for Malignancy After Augmentation Cystoplasty?

INTRODUCTION: Malignancy after augmentation cystoplasty (AC) is reported up to 5.5 %. We assessed the use of urine fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) screening for bladder malignancy after AC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study, 36/98 patients under follow-up who have completed tenth year after ileal AC were included prospectively. Twenty-four (66.7 %) patients were tested with FISH initially and overall 28 (77.8 %) patients with conventional cytology (CC). Twenty-four (66.7 %) patients with FISH analysis also had cytology analysis. Blinded from the cytology results, 32 (88.9 %) patients who were consented underwent cystoscopy with random biopsy (native bladder, ileal segment, ileovesical junction). Two patients those were tested with FISH did not consented cystoscopy. This study was registred to the government registry (No: 71146310). RESULTS: Mean follow-up time after AC was 15.4 ± 4.8 years. 2/32 (5.6 %) patients were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma in cyctoscopic biopsy. FISH analysis of 3/24 (12.5 %) patients demonstrated abnormal findings consistent with malignancy. Two FISH malignant patients were patients who had adenocarcinoma. The third patient's biopsy was benign and the third year control cystoscopy was normal. 2/4 patients with malignant CC had adenocarcinoma and 2/4 patients had benign biopsy. The sensitivity and specificity of FISH in our series were 100 % and 95 % respectively. Whereas the sensitivity and specificity of CC was 100 % and 91.6 % respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite limited number of patients in this study, FISH showed higher specificity than CC in this series. FISH is a promising tool for malignancy screening after AC. TYPE OF STUDY: Diagnostic Studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.