CIC rearranged sarcomas: A single institution experience of the potential pitfalls in interpreting CIC FISH results.

AIM: The aim of this study was to establish how reliable FISH CIC analysis using an IVD (in vitro diagnostic) commercial probe is. METHODS AND RESULTS: A series of 19 CIC-DUX4 sarcomas were evaluated. The samples presenting CIC-DUX4 fusion transcript detected by Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) and Sanger sequencing and/or Next Generation Sequencing were selected for Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization (FISH) CIC analysis with CIC break-apart IVD probe and compared to molecular analysis. CIC FISH analysis showed 26% of false negatives. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that, in the setting of CIC-DUX4 fusion positive small round cell sarcomas, CIC FISH using IVD commercial probe may lead to false-negative results. This novel study evaluates the diagnostic use of a commercial IVD CIC probe for FISH.

The success rate of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization in plasma cell disorders can be improved using unconventional sources of plasma cells.

BACKGROUND: Immunomagnetic cell sorting (IMCS) is a preferred technique for the enrichment of plasma cells (PC) before fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Here, we share our real-world experience regarding the success rate of IMCS, its limitations, and the utility of alternate sources to obtain a successful FISH in various PC disorders. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed in patients with a PC neoplasm, who underwent bone marrow (BM) examination, and FISH testing over 30 months. In all cases with an unsuccessful IMCS, an attempt was made to identify the cause of failure. RESULTS: Immunomagnetic cell sorting of PCs was successful in 395/450 cases (87.8%; 77/98 cases (78.6%) with <10% PCs and 318/352 (90.3%) with ≥10% PCs in BM aspirate; P = .003). Among cases with unsuccessful IMCS (<10% PCs; n = 21 and ≥10% PCs; n = 34), an alternate source could be used successfully in 34 (62%) patients and includes air-dried trephine biopsy imprint smears (n = 28) with aggregates or sheets of PCs, fine-needle aspiration smears/biopsy from plasmacytoma (n = 5), and ascitic fluid (n = 1). 284/395 (71.9%) patients with successful IMCS and all 34 cases with an alternate source of PCs showed at least one cytogenetic abnormality on four-probe FISH. CONCLUSION: Variations in the sample quality together with significant variation in the number of PCs between BM aspirate and the trephine biopsy imprint smears/biopsy reduce the success rate of IMCS in a real-world scenario and necessitate utilization of patient-specific alternate sources of PCs like a trephine biopsy imprint or cytology smears from extramedullary sources for successful FISH testing in PC neoplasms.

Pitfalls in RET Fusion Detection Using Break-Apart FISH Probes in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: A standardized procedure of fused REarranged during Transfection (RET) gene detection using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) remains to be established in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Our purpose was to investigate false-negative and false-positive events and their FISH signal characteristics. METHODS: A total of 111 PTC cases were analyzed using break-apart FISH probes for RET status evaluation. All FISH results were validated using fusion-induced asymmetric transcription assay (FIATA)-based reverse transcription droplet digital PCR (RT-ddPCR). Then, suspected RET-positive cases were tested using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-qPCR), followed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) for recognizing fusion variants. RESULTS: Thirty RET+ cases were revealed, including 20 CCDC6 (exon 1)-RET (exon 12), 6 NCOA4 (exon 8)-RET (exon 12), 1 NCOA4 (exon 7)-RET (exon 12), 1 CCDC186 (exon 7)-RET (exon 12), 1 ERC1 (exon 12)-RET (exon 12) and 1 SPECC1L (exon 9)-RET (exon 12) tumors. All RET fusion cases occurred in the BRAF- population, with a prevalence of 41.7% (30/72). Four cases of 8% to 13% (cutoff was 7.6%) dominant isolated 3' green (IG) FISH signals were RET-. One FISH- case with isolated 5' red (IR) signals with 94% abnormal tumor cells was demonstrated to be positive, harboring the NCOA4 (exon 7)-RET (exon 12) variant. Compared with RET fusions characterized by dominant break-apart signals with 29% to 100% aberrant cells, RET + with dominant IG-signal patterns all showed more frequent FISH+ cells (84%-92%). RET+ PTC with a break-apart signal pattern was more frequently found in unifocal lesions than in multifocal/bilateral tumors (P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: A false-positive or false-negative event may exist for RET status detection in PTCs using the traditional FISH scoring method with break-apart probes.

Analysis of Cellular EMT States Using Molecular Biology and High Resolution FISH Labeling.

Metastasis results from the ability of cancer cells to grow and to spread beyond the primary tumor to distant organs. Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT), a fundamental developmental process, is reactivated in cancer cells, and causes epithelial properties to evolve into mesenchymal and invasive ones. EMT changes cellular characteristics between two distinct states, yet, the process is not binary but rather reflects a broad spectrum of partial EMT states in which cells exhibit various degrees of intermediate epithelial and mesenchymal phenotypes. EMT is a complex multistep process that involves cellular reprogramming through numerous signaling pathways, alterations in gene expression, and changes in chromatin morphology. Therefore, expression of key proteins, including cadherins, occludin, or vimentin must be precisely regulated. A comprehensive understanding of how changes in nuclear organization, at the level of single genes clusters, correlates with these processes during formation of metastatic cells is still missing and yet may help personalized prognosis and treatment in the clinic. Here, we describe methods to correlate physiological and molecular states of cells undergoing an EMT process with chromatin rearrangements observed via FISH labeling of specific domains.

Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) Detection of Chromosomal 12p Anomalies in Testicular Germ Cell Tumors.

Gains of genetic material or internal rearrangements of chromosome 12p, including 12p overrepresentation or isochromosome 12p [i(12p)], are observed in virtually all germ cell tumors (GCT), in all histologic subtypes, and from various body locations. The chromosomal region involved in these alterations contains the growth and survival promoting oncogene KRAS (12p12.1). Gains or rearrangements of 12p characterize GCT from in situ to chemoresistant stages. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) detection of chromosome 12p anomalies is a sensitive and specific test for the diagnosis of germ cell tumors. Here we provide a detailed protocol for FISH detection of isochromosome 12p and chromosome 12p overrepresentation. The method is helpful for diagnosis of germ cell origin, and for selection of patients who may benefit from cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Causes behind error rates for predictive biomarker testing: the utility of sending post-EQA surveys.

External quality assessment (EQA) schemes assess the performance of predictive biomarker testing in lung and colorectal cancer and have previously demonstrated variable error rates. No information is currently available on the underlying causes of incorrect EQA results in the laboratories. Participants in EQA schemes by the European Society of Pathology between 2014 and 2018 for lung and colorectal cancer were contacted to complete a survey if they had at least one analysis error or test failure in the provided cases. Of the 791 surveys that were sent, 325 were completed including data from 185 unique laboratories on 514 incorrectly analyzed or failed cases. For the digital cases and immunohistochemistry, the majority of errors were interpretation-related. For fluorescence in situ hybridization, problems with the EQA materials were reported frequently. For variant analysis, the causes were mainly methodological for lung cancer but variable for colorectal cancer. Post-analytical (clerical and interpretation) errors were more likely detected after release of the EQA results compared to pre-analytical and analytical issues. Accredited laboratories encountered fewer reagent problems and more often responded to the survey. A recent change in test methodology resulted in method-related problems. Testing more samples annually introduced personnel errors and lead to a lower performance in future schemes. Participation to quality improvement projects is important to reduce deviating test results in laboratories, as the different error causes differently affect the test performance. EQA providers could benefit from requesting root cause analyses behind errors to offer even more tailored feedback, subschemes, and cases.

Quantitative Impact of the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) Practice Guideline Update on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Analysis.

CONTEXT.­: The global impact of the new 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) practice guideline update on the overall HER2 status designation, compared with the prior 2013 iteration, is unknown. OBJECTIVES.­: To report the quantitative impact of the new guideline on HER2 status distribution. DESIGN.­: The analysis comprised a retrospective cohort of patients from the authors' institution, combined with other peer-reviewed publications that assessed the impact of the 2018 guideline in relation to the 2013 guideline. RESULTS.­: Our study revealed that the new guideline led to an average 9% reclassification rate for the overall HER2 status, with a net gain in overall HER2 negative designation. This is largely due to reclassification of the equivocal (Group 4) groups. Unexpectedly, infrequent but consistent discordance between Group 1/5 and fluorescence in situ hybridization results are observed across studies (1.8%; 73 of 3965 cases where fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry are both reported). CONCLUSIONS.­: Early clinical recognition of these resultant changes, including emerging issues of tumor heterogeneity, and potential discordance between immunohistochemistry to fluorescence in situ hybridization, is important for accurate clinical assessment of individual HER2 test results.

HER2 Testing for Breast Cancer in the Genomics Laboratory: A Sea Change for Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization.

CONTEXT.­: Guidelines for HER2 testing in breast cancer have changed over time, from the US Food and Drug Administration guideline to the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines published in 2007, 2013, and 2018. OBJECTIVE.­: To investigate the change in assignment of HER2 status in breast cancers with equivocal (2+) immunohistochemistry (IHC) results by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) following implementation of the ASCO/CAP 2018 guideline. DESIGN.­: The study included 3556 invasive breast cancers that were HER2 equivocal (2+) by IHC and were submitted to our FISH laboratory after July 2018. Reflex testing (with repeat IHC staining) was performed on certain categories of FISH results known as groups 2, 3, and 4. Concomitant review of IHC and FISH was performed on these reflex cases per 2018 guideline recommendations. The FISH data were analyzed to compare US Food and Drug Administration and ASCO/CAP 2007, 2013, and 2018 interpretations. RESULTS.­: Of 3548 invasive breast cancers with complete data available, the percentage agreement for FISH according to different guidelines was highest for ASCO/CAP 2018 versus US Food and Drug Administration (96.5%), followed by ASCO/CAP 2018 versus 2007 (93.8%), and lowest with ASCO/CAP 2018 versus 2013 (83.7%). Per the 2018 guideline, reflex IHC testing was performed on 633 breast cancers (17.8%); the majority of reflex testing results were negative (541 of 633; 85.5%). The overall distribution of HER2 FISH results (per the 2018 guideline) was 88.5% negative and 11.5% positive. CONCLUSIONS.­: By eliminating the equivocal FISH category, the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline significantly reduced the HER2 FISH-positive rate in tumors with equivocal (2+) IHC results.

Prenatal diagnosis of BACs-on-Beads assay in 1520 cases from Fujian Province, China.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the application of BACs-on-Beads (BoBs™) assay for rapid detection of chromosomal abnormalities for prenatal diagnosis (PND). METHODS: A total of 1520 samples, including seven chorionic villi biopsy samples, 1328 amniotic fluid samples, and 185 umbilical cord samples from pregnant women were collected to detect the chromosomal abnormalities using BoBs™ assay and karyotyping. Furthermore, abnormal specimens were verified by chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). RESULTS: The results demonstrated that the success rate of karyotyping and BoBs™ assay in PND was 98.09% and 100%, respectively. BoBs™ assay was concordant with karyotyping for Trisomy 21, Trisomy 18, and Trisomy 13, sex chromosomal aneuploidy, Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome, and mosaicism. BoBs™ assay also detected Smith-Magenis syndrome, Williams-Beuren syndrome, DiGeorge syndrome, Miller-Dieker syndrome, Prader-Willi syndrome, Xp22.31 microdeletions, 22q11.2, and 17p11.2 microduplications. However, karyotyping failed to show these chromosomal abnormalities. A case of 8q21.2q23.3 duplication which was found by karyotyping was not detected by BoBs™ assay. Furthermore, all these chromosomal abnormalities were consistent with CMA and FISH verifications. According to the reports, we estimated that the detection rates of karyotyping, BoBs™, and CMA in the present study were 4.28%, 4.93%, and 5%, respectively, which is consistent with the results of a previous study. The respective costs for the three methods were about $135-145, $270-290, and $540-580. CONCLUSION: BoBs™ assay is considered a reliable, rapid test for use in PND. A variety of comprehensive technological applications can complement each other in PND, in order to maximize the diagnosis rate and reduce the occurrence of birth defects.

Simultaneous Detection of RNAs and Proteins with Subcellular Resolution.

We describe the detailed methods of "immunoFISH" to analyze the expression level and the spatial localization of RNA transcripts and proteins on cultured cells and formal-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections. On cultured cells, we detect specific transcripts using the Stellaris fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes labeled with fluorophores that target multiple regions along the desired transcripts and proteins combining the immunofluorescent staining. On FFPE tissue sections, we use the RNAscope FISH probes, modified branched DNA (bDNA) probes to amplify the RNA signals, followed by immunofluorescent staining for protein detection. The abundance, composition, and spatial distribution are determined by signals from fluorescently labeled proteins and individual transcripts of images acquired using high-resolution fluorescence microscopy.

High-risk cytogenetics in multiple myeloma: Further scrutiny of deletions within the IGH gene region enhances risk stratification.

Multiple myeloma is a clonal malignancy of plasma cells in the bone marrow. Risk stratification is partly based on cytogenetic findings that include abnormalities of the IGH locus as determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), such as rearrangements that result in either standard-risk or high-risk gene fusions. IGH deletions have been evaluated as a group in multiple myeloma patients with respect to cumulative outcomes but have provided limited guidance. Whether these deletions have the potential to result in gene fusions and thus further stratify patients is unknown. We identified 229 IGH deletions in patients referred for plasma cell dyscrasia genetic testing over 5.5 years. Follow-up was conducted on 208 of the deletions with dual fusion FISH probes for standard-risk (IGH-CCND1) and high-risk IGH gene fusions (IGH-FGFR3, IGH-MAF, IGH-MAFB). Of all deletions identified with follow-up, 44 (21%) resulted in a gene fusion as detected by FISH, 15 (7%) of which were fusion partners associated with high-risk multiple myeloma. All fusion-positive 3'-IGH deletions (6 fusions) resulted in high-risk IGH-FGFR3 fusions. Of the 15 high-risk fusion-positive cases, eight were without other high-risk cytogenetic findings. This study is the first to evaluate the presence of IGH gene fusions upon identification of IGH deletions and to characterize the deletion locus. Importantly, these findings indicate that follow-up FISH studies with dual fusion probes should be standard of care when IGH deletions are identified in multiple myeloma.

Design of a Comprehensive Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization Assay for Genetic Classification of T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) results from deregulation of a number of genes via multiple genomic mechanisms. We designed a comprehensive fluorescence in situ hybridization (CI-FISH) assay that consists of genomic probes to simultaneously investigate oncogenes and oncosuppressors recurrently involved in chromosome rearrangements in T-ALL, which was applied to 338 T-ALL cases. CI-FISH provided genetic classification into one of the well-defined genetic subgroups (ie, TAL/LMO, HOXA, TLX3, TLX1, NKX2-1/2-2, or MEF2C) in 80% of cases. Two patients with translocations of the LMO3 transcription factor were identified, suggesting that LMO3 activation may serve as an alternative to LMO1/LMO2 activation in the pathogenesis of this disease. Moreover, intrachromosomal rearrangements that involved the 10q24 locus were found as a new mechanism of TLX1 activation. An unequal distribution of cooperating genetic defects was found among the six genetic subgroups. Interestingly, deletions that targeted TCF7 or TP53 were exclusively found in HOXA T-ALL, LEF1 defects were prevalent in NKX2-1 rearranged patients, CASP8AP2 and PTEN alterations were significantly enriched in TAL/LMO leukemias, and PTPN2 and NUP214-ABL1 abnormalities occurred in TLX1/TLX3. This work convincingly shows that CI-FISH is a powerful tool to define genetic heterogeneity of T-ALL, which may be applied as a rapid and accurate diagnostic test.

The updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 interpretation in breast cancer: comparison with previous guidelines and clinical significance of the proposed in situ hybridization groups.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of the updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guideline on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) interpretation in breast cancer compared with that of the previous guidelines and also the significance of in situ hybridization (ISH) groups proposed by the updated guideline. HER2 ISH reports and immunohistochemistry (IHC) data from 1,348 invasive breast cancers diagnosed at a single institution were included in this study. HER2 IHC was reassessed using the 2018 guideline, and HER2 ISH status was determined by the 2007, 2013, and 2018 guidelines. When applying the updated guideline, most of the HER2 ISH-equivocal cases as per the previous guidelines were reclassified as ISH negative, and 0.8% of HER2 ISH-positive tumors as per the 2007 guideline and 2.5% of those as per the 2013 guideline were changed to ISH negative. Accordingly, the negative HER2 ISH results significantly increased in the 2018 guideline compared with the 2013 guideline. HER2 ISH-positive tumors in ISH group 3 (HER2/chromosome enumeration probe 17 [CEP17] ratio <2.0 and average HER2 copy number ≥6.0 per cell) were characterized by equivocal HER2 protein expression, CEP17 copy number gain, and low HER2 copy numbers compared with classic HER2 ISH-positive tumors in ISH group 1 (HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥2.0 and average HER2 copy number ≥4.0 per cell). HER2 ISH-negative tumors in ISH group 4 (HER2/CEP17 ratio <2.0 with average HER2 copy number ≥4.0 and < 6.0 per cell) revealed more aggressive clinicopathologic features and poorer clinical outcomes than those in ISH group 5 (HER2/CEP17 ratio <2.0 and average HER2 copy number <4.0 per cell), especially in the hormone receptor-positive subgroup. In conclusion, implementation of the updated 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline leads to a significant increase in HER2 ISH-negative results compared with the 2013 guideline, mainly via reclassification of the ISH-equivocal cases to ISH-negative ones. ISH groups proposed by the updated guideline provide additional information on the clinicopathologic characteristics of the tumors.

Validation of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) for Chromosome 5 Monosomy and Deletion.

In order to comply with regulations set by established local, state, and federal agencies and other regulatory organizations, such as the College of American Pathologists and the International Organization for Standardization, a clinical laboratory needs to develop procedures for the processes of validating laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) and establishing performance specifications for these assays prior to use in clinical testing. This is applicable to all fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays. Even Food and Drug Administration-approved FISH assays must undergo some form of verification before implementation in the clinical laboratory. The process of validating an assay as an LDT must include a plan, a procedure, and a report. The validation studies described here include metaphase and interphase FISH methodology for identification of the LSI EGR1/D5S23, D5S721 dual-color probe, which labels distinct biomarkers consistent with myeloid hematologic disorders, including myelodysplasias and acute myeloid leukemia. © 2020 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Basic Protocol 1: Validation plan for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes for chromosome 5 monosomy and deletion Support Protocol: Normal cut-off calculation Basic Protocol 2: Validation procedure for FISH probes for chromosome 5 monosomy and deletion Basic Protocol 3: Validation report for FISH probes for chromosome 5 monosomy and deletion.

Mate pair sequencing outperforms fluorescence in situ hybridization in the genomic characterization of multiple myeloma.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is currently the gold-standard assay to detect recurrent genomic abnormalities of prognostic significance in multiple myeloma (MM). Since most translocations in MM involve a position effect with heterogeneous breakpoints, we hypothesize that FISH has the potential to miss translocations involving these regions. We evaluated 70 bone marrow samples from patients with plasma cell dyscrasia by FISH and whole-genome mate-pair sequencing (MPseq). Thirty cases (42.9%) displayed at least one instance of discordance between FISH and MPseq for each primary and secondary abnormality evaluated. Nine cases had abnormalities detected by FISH that went undetected by MPseq including 6 tetraploid clones and three cases with missed copy number abnormalities. In contrast, 19 cases had abnormalities detected by MPseq that went undetected by FISH. Seventeen were MYC rearrangements and two were 17p deletions. MPseq identified 36 MYC abnormalities and 17 (50.0% of MYC abnormal group with FISH results) displayed a false negative FISH result. MPseq identified 10 cases (14.3%) with IgL rearrangements, a recent marker of poor outcome, and 10% with abnormalities in genes associated with lenalidomide response or resistance. In summary, MPseq was superior in the characterization of rearrangement complexity and identification of secondary abnormalities demonstrating increased clinical value compared to FISH.

Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization interpretation in invasive breast cancers with immunohistochemically equivocal results.

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) recently issued updated guidelines on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in invasive breast cancers. In this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of the new recommendations on HER2 FISH interpretation in invasive breast cancers with immunohistochemically (IHC) equivocal results. 1810 breast cancer cases with IHC equivocal results were enrolled in this study between January 2012 and May 2019. Concomitant IHC was performed on the same tissue blocks detected by FISH testing. According to the 2018 guidelines, all the cases in ISH group 2 were categorized as HER2 negative; three of four cases in ISH group 3 were considered as HER2 positive, while the one scored IHC 1+ was reclassified as HER2 negative; Fifty-three previously ISH equivocal cases were redistributed into ten HER2-positive cases and forty-three HER2-negative cases. In conclusion, the utility of 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines resulted in a slight decrease in HER2 positive rate, due to the reclassification of cases in ISH group 2 and group 4. The implementation of the new guidelines can reduce reflex FISH test and make the diagnosis of HER2 gene status more definitive.

Interlaboratory concordance in HER2 testing: Results of a Serbian ring-study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the immunohistochemistry and chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) inter-laboratory consensus between national pathology laboratories in Serbia. METHODS: This study was conducted between 2013 and 2016. In 2013, HER2 results were evaluated using two sets of four different breast cancer specimens in five laboratories. A total of 20 immunohistochemistry and 20 CISH cases were tested. In 2014, there were 6 testing rounds, and a total of 24 specimens were analyzed, whereas in 2015 and 2016, seven testing rounds were conducted, with four additional cases (i.e. a total of 28 specimens). In 2014, 2015 and 2016, all institutions performed immunohistochemical analysis only. RESULTS: We found discrepan¬cies in HER2 immunohistochemical (IHC) results in all four surveys. IHC testing resulted in diagnostic discordance between participating centers in two (2/17) cases in 2013, two (2/24) in 2014, four (4/27) cases in 2015 and three cases (3/27) in 2016. The overall agreement among the centers was 79%, 85.5%, 83.5% and 89.4%, respectively. For CISH analyses, the results for 16 (84.2%) of 19 samples were consistent for all participants. Three results were found to be discordant, indicating a misdiagnosis rate of 15.8%. In all the discrepant cases, interinstitutional discordances were related to technical and evaluation issues. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the difficulty encountered during HER2 testing using immunohistochemistry and CISH. This also emphasizes the need for rigorous quality control procedures for specimen preparation and analysis.