Efficacy and safety of hydromorphone for cancer pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cancer pain significantly impacts individuals' quality of life, with opioids being employed as the primary means for pain relief. Nevertheless, concerns persist regarding the adverse reactions and effectiveness of opioids such as morphine. Hydromorphone, recognized as a potent opioid, is a viable alternative for managing cancer-related pain. The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the effectiveness and safety characteristics of hydromorphone in comparison to other opioids, as well as different methods of administering this medication within the scope of cancer pain treatment. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched on December 25th, 2023. Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic investigation of databases was carried out, and suitable studies were chosen according to predetermined criteria (PICO framework). The meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model. RESULTS: This review included 18 RCTs with 2271 patients who compared hydromorphone with morphine, oxycodone, or fentanyl, as well as other types of hydromorphone. Hydromorphone demonstrated efficacy similar to that of morphine and oxycodone in reducing cancer pain intensity, decreasing additional analgesic consumption, and improving quality of life. However, morphine showed slight superiority over hydromorphone in reducing breakthrough pain. Adverse events were comparable between hydromorphone and morphine or oxycodone. Patient-controlled and clinician-controlled hydromorphone administration routes yielded similar outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of this study substantiate the efficacy of hydromorphone in the management of cancer-related pain, demonstrating similar levels of effectiveness and safety as morphine and oxycodone. These findings are consistent with prior comprehensive analyses, suggesting that hydromorphone is a feasible choice for alleviating cancer-associated pain. Additional investigations are warranted to determine its efficacy in distinct patient cohorts and for different modes of administration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospero registration ID: CRD42024517513. Link: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails .

Effects of hydromorphone-based patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative hypoxaemia: a randomised controlled non-inferiority clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effects of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) with and without low-basal infusion on postoperative hypoxaemia. DESIGN: A randomised parallel-group non-inferiority trial. SETTING: The trial was conducted at a grade-A tertiary hospital from December 2021 to August 2022. PARTICIPANTS: 160 adults undergoing gastrointestinal tumour surgery and receiving postoperative PCIA. INTERVENTIONS: Participants randomly received a low-basal (0.1 mg/hour of hydromorphone) or no-basal infusion PCIA for postoperative 48 hours. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was area under curve (AUC) per hour for hypoxaemia, defined as pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) <95%. Secondary outcomes included: AUC per hour at SpO2<90% and <85%, hydromorphone consumption, ambulation time and analgesic outcomes up to 48 hours after surgery. RESULTS: Among 160 randomised patients, 159 completed the trial. An intention-to-treat analysis showed that AUC per hour (SpO2<95%) was greater in the low-basal infusion group compared with the no-basal infusion group, with a median difference of 0.097 (95% CI 0.001 to 0.245). Non-inferiority (margin: ratio of means (ROM) of 1.25) was not confirmed since the ROM between the two groups was 2.146 (95% CI 2.138 to 2.155). Hydromorphone consumption was higher in the low-basal group than in the no-basal group (median: 5.2 mg versus 1.6 mg, p<0.001). Meanwhile, there were no differences in the AUC values at the other two hypoxaemia thresholds, in ambulation time, or pain scores between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among the patients receiving hydromorphone PCIA after gastrointestinal tumour resection, low-basal infusion was inferior to no-basal infusion PCIA for postoperative hypoxaemia at SpO2<95% up to 48 hours after surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2100054317.

Comparison of Analgesic Effects and Adverse Events of Hydromorphone PCIA Versus Sufentanil PCIA: A Retrospective Analysis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic effect and adverse events of hydromorphone patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) without background dose versus sufentanil PCIA with background dose in patients after surgery. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis. METHODS: From June 2020 to May 2021, 1,594 eligible postoperative patients who received PCIA were included in this study. According to the types of opioids, patients were divided into two groups: the sufentanil group and the hydromorphone group. The Numerical Rating Scale, Functional Activity Scale, and Level of Sedation were used to evaluate the analgesic effects between the two groups. In addition, total patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) use, effective number of PCA compressions, and adverse effects of PCIA were compared between the two groups. FINDINGS: At 24 hours (h) after surgery, the Functional Activity Scale score in the sufentanil group was higher than that in the hydromorphone group (P < .05). Compared with the sufentanil group, total PCA use, total number of PCA compressions and effective number of PCA consumptions were significantly decreased in the hydromorphone group during a 48 hours period (P < .05). There were no statistical differences in Numerical Rating Scale score, Level of Sedation score, and adverse events between two groups at 24 hours and 48 hours after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with sufentanil PCIA with a background dose, under a similar analgesic effect, hydromorphone PCIA without a background dose provided lower PCA use. Our findings may provide useful evidence for more future studies related to postoperative analgesia.

Hydromorphone combined with ropivacaine for erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Combining hydromorphone with ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane blocks enhances postoperative analgesia and reduces interleukin-6 expression in breast surgery patients. METHODS: In this study, breast cancer patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy were randomized into 3 groups for anesthesia (30 patients in each group): standard general (group C), Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) with ropivacaine (group R), and ESPB with ropivacaine plus hydromorphone (group HR). Diagnosis: Breast cancer patients. Postsurgery, pain levels, IL-6, anesthetic doses, additional analgesia needs, and recovery milestones were compared to evaluate the efficacy of the ESPB enhancements. RESULTS: The 3 groups were not significantly different in baseline characteristics, operation time, number of cases with postoperative nausea, and serum IL-6 concentrations at T1 (the time of being returned to the ward after surgery). At T2 (at 6:00 in the next morning after surgery), the serum IL-6 concentration in group HR was significantly lower than that in groups R and C (P < .05); the intraoperative doses of remifentanil, sufentanil, and propofol were significantly lower in groups HR and R than those in group C (P < .05); Groups HR and R had significantly lower visual analog scale scores at T3 (4 hours postoperatively), T4 (12 hours postoperatively), and T5 (24 hours postoperatively) than those in group C (P < .05); the proportions of patients receiving postoperative remedial analgesia were significantly lower in groups HR and R than in group C (P < .05); groups HR and R had significantly lower proportions of patients with postoperative nausea than group C (P < .05); the time to the first anal exhaust and the time to the first ambulation after surgery were significantly shorter in groups HR and R than those in group C (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Hydromorphone combined with ropivacaine for ESPB achieved a greater postoperative analgesic effect for patients receiving MRM under general anesthesia. The combined analgesia caused fewer adverse reactions and inhibited the expression level of the inflammatory factor IL-6 more effectively, thereby facilitating postoperative recovery. ESPB using hydromorphone with ropivacaine improved pain control post-MRM, reduced adverse effects, and more effectively suppressed IL-6, enhancing recovery.

Erector spinae plane block did not improve postoperative pain-related outcomes and recovery after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery : a randomised controlled double-blinded multi-center trial.

INTRODUCTION: There is a sizable niche for a minimally invasive analgesic technique that could facilitate ambulatory video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Our study aimed to determine the analgesic potential of a single-shot erector spinae plane (ESP) block for VATS. The primary objective was the total hydromorphone consumption with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) 24 h after surgery. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, controlled, double-blind study with patients scheduled for VATS in two major university-affiliated hospital centres. We randomized 52 patients into two groups: a single-shot ESP block using bupivacaine or an ESP block with normal saline (control). We administered a preoperative and postoperative (24 h) quality of recovery (QoR-15) questionnaire and assessed postoperative pain using a verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS) score. We evaluated the total standardized intraoperative fentanyl administration, total postoperative hydromorphone consumption (PCA; primary endpoint), and the incidence of adverse effects. RESULTS: There was no difference in the primary objective, hydromorphone consumption at 24 h (7.6 (4.4) mg for the Bupivacaine group versus 8.1 (4.2) mg for the Control group). Secondary objectives and incidence of adverse events were not different between the two groups at any time during the first 24 h following surgery. CONCLUSION: Our multi-centre randomized, controlled, double-blinded study found no advantage of an ESP block over placebo for VATS for opioid consumption, pain, or QoR-15 scores. Further studies are ongoing to establish the benefits of using a denser block (single-shot paravertebral with a continuous ESP block), which may provide a better quality of analgesia.

Efficacy of bilateral catheter superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks using programmed intermittent bolus for opioid-sparing postoperative analgesia in cardiac surgery with sternotomy: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study investigated whether catheter superficial parasternal intercostal plane (SPIP) blocks, using a programmed intermittent bolus (PIB) with ropivacaine, could reduce opioid consumption while delivering enhanced analgesia for a period exceeding 48 h following cardiac surgery involving sternotomy. DESIGN: A double-blind, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: University-affiliated tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: 60 patients aged 18 or older, scheduled for cardiac surgery via sternotomy. INTERVENTIONS: The patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the ropivacaine or saline group. After surgery, patients received bilateral SPIP blocks for 48 h with 0.4% ropivacaine (20 mL per side) for induction, followed by bilateral SPIP catheters using PIB with 0.2% ropivacaine (8 mL/side, interspersed with a 2-h interval) or 0.9% normal saline following the same administration schedule. All patients were administered patient-controlled analgesia with hydromorphone. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the cumulative morphine equivalent consumption during the initial 48 h after the surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain assessment using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at rest and during coughing at designated intervals for three days post-extubation. Furthermore, recovery indicators and ropivacaine plasma levels were diligently documented. MAIN RESULTS: Cumulative morphine consumption within 48 h in ropivacaine group decreased significantly compared to saline group (25.34 ± 31.1 mg vs 76.28 ± 77.2 mg, respectively; 95% CI, -81.9 to -20.0, P = 0.002). The ropivacaine group also reported lower NRS scores at all recorded time points (P < 0.05) and a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting than the saline group (3/29 vs 12/29, respectively; P = 0.007). Additionally, the ropivacaine group showed significant improvements in ambulation (P = 0.018), respiratory exercises (P = 0.006), and self-reported analgesia satisfaction compared to the saline group (P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral catheter SPIP blocks using PIB with ropivacaine reduced opioid consumption over 48 h, concurrently delivering superior postoperative analgesia in adult cardiac surgery with sternotomy.

Gastrointestinal adverse effects associated with the use of intravenous oliceridine compared with intravenous hydromorphone or fentanyl in acute pain management utilizing adjusted indirect treatment comparison methods.

Background: In the absence of head-to-head comparative data from randomized controlled trials, indirect treatment comparisons (ITCs) may be used to compare the relative effects of treatments versus a common comparator (either placebo or active treatment). For acute pain management, the effects of oliceridine have been compared in clinical trials to morphine but not to fentanyl or hydromorphone. Aim: To assess the comparative safety (specifically differences in the incidence of nausea, vomiting and opioid-induced respiratory depression [OIRD]) between oliceridine and relevant comparators (fentanyl and hydromorphone) through ITC analysis. Methods: A systematic literature review identified randomized clinical trials with oliceridine versus morphine and morphine versus fentanyl or hydromorphone. The ITC utilized the common active comparator, morphine, for the analysis. Results: A total of six randomized controlled trials (oliceridine - 2; hydromorphone - 3; fentanyl - 1) were identified for data to be used in the ITC analyses. The oliceridine data were reported in two studies (plastic surgery and orthopedic surgery) and were also reported in a pooled analysis. The ITC focused on nausea and vomiting due to limited data for OIRD. When oliceridine was compared with hydromorphone in the ITC analysis, oliceridine significantly reduced the incidence of nausea and/or vomiting requiring antiemetics compared with hydromorphone (both orthopedic surgery and pooled data), while results in plastic surgery were not statistically significant. When oliceridine was compared with hydromorphone utilizing data from Hong, the ITC only showed a trend toward reduced risk of nausea and vomiting with oliceridine that was not statistically significant across all three comparisons (orthopedic surgery, plastic surgery and combined). An ITC comparing oliceridine with a study of fentanyl utilizing the oliceridine orthopedic surgery data and combined orthopedic and plastic surgery data showed a trend toward reduced risk that was not statistically significant. Conclusion: In ITC analyses, oliceridine significantly reduced the incidence of nausea and/or vomiting or the need for antiemetics in orthopedic surgery compared with hydromorphone and a non-significant trend toward reduced risk versus fentanyl.

Impact of Replacing Fentanyl With Hydromorphone as the First-Line Postoperative Opioid Among Patients Undergoing Outpatient Cancer Surgery.

PURPOSE: In response to a nationwide fentanyl shortage, our institution assessed whether changing our first-line postoperative intravenous opioid from fentanyl to hydromorphone impacted patient outcomes. The primary research aim was to evaluate the association between first-line opioid and rapidity of recovery. DESIGN: The study team retrospectively obtained data on all consecutive patients extracted from the electronic medical record. The rapidity of recovery was defined as the time from entry into the postanesthesia care unit to the transition to Phase 2 for ambulatory extended recovery patients and as the length of total postanesthesia care unit stay for outpatients. METHODS: Following intent-to-treat-principles, we tested the association between study period and rapidity of recovery (a priori clinically meaningful difference: 20 minutes) using multivariable linear regression, adjusting for anesthesia type (general vs monitored anesthesia care), American Society of Anesthesiologst physical status (ASA) score (1-2 vs 3-4), age, service, robotic procedure, and surgery start time. FINDINGS: Ambulatory extended recovery patients treated in the hydromorphone period had, on average, a 0.25 minute (95% confidence interval [CI] -6.5, 7.0), nonstatistically significant (P > .9) longer time to transition. For outpatient procedures, those who received hydromorphone had, on average, 8.5-minute longer stays (95% CI 3.7-13, P < .001). Although we saw statistical evidence of an increased risk of resurgery associated with receiving hydromorphone (0.5%; 95% CI -0.1%, 1.0%; P = .039 on univariate analysis), the size of the estimate is clinically and biologically implausible and is most likely a chance finding related either to multiple testing or confounding. CONCLUSIONS: The multidisciplinary team concluded that the increase in postoperative length of stay associated with hydromorphone was not clinically significant and the decrease waste of prefilled syringes outweighed the small potential increased risk of resurgery compared to the shorter-acting fentanyl. We will therefore use hydromorphone moving forward.

Relationship between opioid cross-tolerance during buprenorphine stabilization and return to opioid use during buprenorphine dose tapering.

RATIONALE: Opioid injection drug use (IDU) has been linked to a more severe pattern of use (e.g. tolerance, overdose risk) and shorter retention in treatment, which may undermine abstinence attempts. OBJECTIVES: This secondary data analysis of four human laboratory studies investigated whether current opioid IDU modulates subjective abuse liability responses to high-dose hydromorphone during intermediate-dose buprenorphine stabilization (designed to suppress withdrawal but allow surmountable agonist effects), and whether hydromorphone response magnitude predicts latency of return to opioid use during buprenorphine dose-tapering. METHODS: Regular heroin users not currently seeking treatment (n = 54; 29 current injectors, 25 non-injectors) were stabilized on 8-mg/day sublingual buprenorphine and assessed for subjective responses (e.g. 'liking', craving) to hydromorphone 24-mg intramuscular challenge (administered 16-hr post-buprenorphine) under randomized, double-blinded, controlled conditions. A subgroup (n = 35) subsequently completed a standardized 3-week outpatient buprenorphine dose-taper, paired with opioid-abstinent contingent reinforcement, and were assessed for return to opioid use based on thrice-weekly urinalysis and self-report. RESULTS: During buprenorphine stabilization, IDU reported lower 'liking' of buprenorphine and post-hydromorphone peak 'liking', 'good effect' and 'high' compared to non-IDU. Less hydromorphone peak increase-from-baseline in 'liking' (which correlated with less hydromorphone-induced craving suppression) predicted significantly faster return to opioid use during buprenorphine dose-tapering. CONCLUSIONS: In these buprenorphine-stabilized regular heroin users, IDU is associated with attenuated 'liking' response (more cross-tolerance) to buprenorphine and to high-dose hydromorphone challenge and, in turn, this cross-tolerance (but not IDU) predicts faster return to opioid use. Further research should examine mechanisms that link cross-tolerance to treatment response.

Tapentadol in Cancer Patients with Neuropathic Pain: A Comparison of Methadone, Oxycodone, Fentanyl, and Hydromorphone.

Tapentadol has µ-opioid receptor stimulating and noradrenaline reuptake inhibiting properties, and should be effective for neuropathic pain (NP). However, the efficacy of tapentadol for NP in cancer patients is unclear. Ashiya Municipal Hospital (Hyogo, Japan) enrolled five groups of Japanese cancer patients between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2019. Patients with NP were administered tapentadol (n = 29), methadone (n = 32), oxycodone (n = 20), fentanyl (n = 26), or hydromorphone (n = 20). The primary endpoint was the difference in the verbal rating scale (VRS) scores between days 0 and 7. The secondary endpoint was the tolerability of each opioid. Before administering opioids among the five groups, there was no significant difference in the VRS score (p = 0.99). The mean reduction in the VRS score on day 7 was significantly greater in the tapentadol group than in the oxycodone group (p = 0.0024) and was larger than that of the methadone, fentanyl, and hydromorphone groups. Regarding safety, the discontinuation rate in the tapentadol group was the lowest of all groups (tapentadol vs. methadone vs. oxycodone vs. fentanyl vs. hydromorphone, 0.0% vs. 6.3% vs. 5.0% vs. 3.8% vs. 10.0%, respectively). This study suggests that tapentadol could be efficacious for cancer patients with NP, and a preferred option in cases that require immediate dose adjustment or for those at high risk for adverse effects. However, the pain intensity was evaluated without pain assessment scales specific to NP. Thus, we think that it is desirable to validate our findings using assessment scales, such as the painDETECT questionnaire in future.

Effectiveness of analgesia with hydromorphone hydrochloride for postoperative pain following surgical repair of structural congenital malformations in children: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Effective postoperative analgesia is needed to prevent the negative effects of postoperative pain on patient outcomes. To compare the effectiveness of hydromorphone hydrochloride and sufentanil, combined with flurbiprofen axetil, for postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients. METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled trial included 222 pediatric patients scheduled for repair of a structural congenital malformation under general anesthesia. Patients were randomized into 3 groups: hydromorphone hydrochloride 0.1 mg/kg (H1), hydromorphone hydrochloride 0.2 mg/kg; (H2) or sufentanil 1.5 µg/kg (S). Analgesics were diluted in 0.9% saline to 100 ml and infused continuously at a basic flow rate of 2 mL per h. The primary outcome measure was the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) pain score. Secondary outcomes included heart rate (HR), respiration rate (RR), SpO2, Ramsay sedation scores, scores on the Paediatric Anaesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale, adverse reactions, parent satisfaction with analgesia. RESULTS: The FLACC score was significantly lower in H1 and H2 groups compared to S. The Ramsay sedation score was significantly higher in H1 and H2 groups compared to S. Recovery time was shorter in H1 group compared to patients H2 group or S group. There were no significant differences in the PAED scale, HR, RR, SpO2, adverse reactions, satisfaction of parents with analgesia, or length and cost of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Hydromorphone hydrochloride is a more effective analgesic than sufentanil for postoperative pain in pediatric patients following surgical repair of a structural congenital malformation, however, hydromorphone hydrochloride and sufentanil had similar safety profiles in this patient population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Register ChiCTR-INR-17013935). Clinical trial registry URL: Date of registration: December 14, 2017.

Opioid rotation from transdermal fentanyl to continuous subcutaneous hydromorphone in a cachectic patient: A case report and review of the literature.

Opioid rotation from transdermal fentanyl to an alternate opioid is often necessitated in advanced disease, but is fraught with uncertainty due to variable absorption from the patch in end-stage illness and the lack of a clearly established opioid rotation ratio. The manufacturer of transdermal fentanyl provides opioid rotation recommendations only for rotation from the oral morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) of opioid to the patch, not in the opposite direction. This is a case report of a single patient with cancer and cachexia admitted to the palliative care unit of a large academic medical centre in Canada. The patient is a 50-year-old female with widely metastatic breast cancer who developed opioid toxicity when maintenance transdermal fentanyl patch therapy (100 µg patch applied every 72 h) was rotated to subcutaneous hydromorphone infusion to improve pain control. Hydromorphone was initiated at a rate of 1 mg/h by continuous infusion based on an opioid rotation ratio for transdermal fentanyl (µg/h):MEDD (mg/day) of 1:2.4. Opioid toxicity eventually resolved with downward titration of hydromorphone to only 30% of the initially estimated equianalgesic dose. This case highlights the need for close follow-up of all patients undergoing opioid rotation from transdermal fentanyl and reinforces the need to reduce the initial dose of the new opioid by 30%-50% of the calculated MEDD, especially when rotating from a high dose of transdermal fentanyl, or if there are factors potentially impairing absorption from the patch such as age, cachexia and weight loss, or if rotation is performed for reasons other than uncontrolled pain.

Use of Microfluidics to Fabricate Bioerodable Lipid Hybrid Nanoparticles Containing Hydromorphone or Ketamine for the Relief of Intractable Pain.

PURPOSE: For patients with intractable cancer-related pain, administration of strong opioid analgesics and adjuvant agents by the intrathecal (i.t.) route in close proximity to the target receptors/ion channels, may restore pain relief. Hence, the aim of this study was to use bioerodable polymers to encapsulate an opioid analgesic (hydromorphone) and an adjuvant drug (ketamine) to produce prolonged-release formulations for i.t. injection. METHODS: A two-stage microfluidic method was used to fabricate nanoparticles (NPs). The physical properties were characterised using dynamic light scattering and transmission electron microscopy. A pilot in vivo study was conducted in a rat model of peripheral neuropathic pain. RESULTS: The in vitro release of encapsulated payload from NPs produced with a polymer mixture (CPP-SA/PLGA 50:50) was sustained for 28 days. In a pilot in vivo study, analgesia was maintained over a three day period following i.t. injection of hydromorphone-loaded NPs at 50 µg. Co-administration of ketamine-loaded NPs at 340 µg did not increase the duration of analgesia significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The two-stage microfluidic method allowed efficient production of analgesic/adjuvant drug-loaded NPs. Our proof-of-principle in vivo study shows prolonged hydromorphone analgesic for 78 h after single i.t. injection. At the i.t. dose administered, ketamine released from NPs was insufficient to augment hydromorphone analgesia.

Total injectable anesthesia of dogs and cats for remote location veterinary sterilization clinic.

BACKGROUND: Sterilization clinics often occur in remote places where anesthesia machines and compressed oxygen are unavailable. This study describes the use of total injectable anesthesia in dogs and cats presented for sterilization in a remote location. RESULTS: A total of 100 animals were sterilized; 26 female cats (CF), 22 male cats (CM), 28 female dogs (DF), and 24 male dogs (DM). CF were anesthetized with dexmedetomidine (20 mcg/kg), ketamine (8 mg/kg) and hydromorphone (0.1 mg/kg) IM. CM were anesthetized with dexmedetomidine (15 mcg/kg), ketamine (5 mg/kg) and hydromorphone (0.1 mg/kg) IM. Insufficient anesthesia in cats was treated with alfaxalone (1 mg/kg) IM. All cats were administered meloxicam at 0.3 mg/kg SQ. DF were anesthetized with dexmedetomidine (15 mcg/kg), ketamine (7-10 mg/kg) and hydromorphone (0.1 mg/kg) IM. DM were anesthetized with dexmedetomidine (15 mcg/kg), ketamine (5 mg/kg) and hydromorphone (0.1 mg/kg) IM. All dogs had IV catheter and endotracheal tube placed. If SpO2 < 91%, ventilation was assisted with an Ambu bag. Insufficient anesthesia in dogs was treated with alfaxalone (1 mg/kg) IV. All dogs were administered meloxicam at 0.2 mg/kg SQ. Following surgery, atipamezole (0.05-0.1 mg/kg) IM was administered to any patient that did not have voluntary movement. All patients survived and were discharged. Less than 25% of cats and male dogs required supplemental anesthesia. Fifty seven percent of female dogs required supplemental anesthesia. More than 89% of patients (in any group) required atipamezole administration. One cat recovered with agitation and hyperthermia (41.1C/ 106F). Some dogs required ventilatory assistance to remain normoxemic while anesthetized. CONCLUSION: Total injectable anesthesia can be accomplished for remote location sterilization clinics with minimal morbidity.

Intrathecal hydromorphone as an analgesia option for gynecology patients.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal perioperative strategy originally developed to attenuate the postsurgical stress response in patients after colorectal surgery. Patients undergoing gynecologic surgery who had ERAS had significantly shorter hospital length of stay, reduced hospital-related costs, and acceptable pain management with reduced opioid use, without compromising patient satisfaction. Intrathecal hydromorphone is an effective alternative ERAS protocol analgesia for these patients and will not compromise patient outcomes or healthcare costs.

Successful utilisation of epidural analgesia for perioperative pain management in a child with sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit (SCN1A) gene mutation.

Sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit (SCN1A) gene mutation is a rare disorder with a large spectrum of clinical presentations. Little is known regarding anaesthetic and analgesic management of these patients. We present a case of a child with SCN1A gene mutation that was successfully managed with an epidural for perioperative analgesia for an abdominal surgery.

Examination of laryngeal function of healthy dogs by using sedation protocols with dexmedetomidine.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the ability to evaluate laryngeal function under sedation with dexmedetomidine alone or in combination with opioids. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, crossover, blinded study. ANIMALS: Eight adult research hounds weighing 8 to 22.5 kg. METHODS: Dogs were sedated with propofol, dexmedetomidine, dexmedetomidine and butorphanol, or dexmedetomidine and hydromorphone. Digital images were collected with video laryngoscopy before and after doxapram administration. Maximal inspiratory normalized glottal gap (GGAn ) and laryngeal motion were compared between and within protocols before and after doxapram by using a difference of least squares mean. RESULTS: Normal laryngeal function was confirmed in all dogs with all protocols except propofol, which resulted in two false positive results. No difference between protocols was detected for predoxapram GGAn . Postdoxapram GGAn was greater than predoxapram GGAn for all four sedation protocols (P ≤ .0030). Compared with propofol, postdoxapram GGAn was greater for all three dexmedetomidine protocols (P ≤ .0420). CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine alone or in combination with opioids was an effective sedation protocol for laryngeal examination, producing sufficient immobilization to prevent jaw motion and without affecting arytenoid abduction. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Dexmedetomidine sedation does not inhibit normal laryngeal motion. Laryngeal examination with propofol alone can produce false positive results.

Prospective Association of Serum Opioid Levels and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Cancer Pain Treated With Intrathecal Opioid Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Opioids remain the mainstay of cancer pain management but are associated with systemic toxicity. In refractory cancer pain, intrathecal therapy (ITT) is associated with improved pain control, reduced systemic side effects, and improved survival. It has been assumed that ITT decreases systemic serum opioid levels and their associated toxicity, but there are limited data to support this assumption. This study hypothesizes that serum opioid levels decrease with ITT. Secondary objectives include comparative measures of pain, bowel function, and other cancer-related symptoms. METHODS: Fifty-one cancer patients undergoing ITT for cancer pain were recruited in a prospective observational study. Daily oral morphine equivalency (OME) dose, serum opioid levels, Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI), and a constipation questionnaire were obtained at the time of implant, and 4 and 8 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: Average baseline daily OME was 375 mg (median, 240; interquartile range, 150-405; range, 0-3160), mean serum morphine concentration was 53.7 ng/mL (n = 17), and mean oxycodone concentration was 73.7 ng/mL (n = 20). At 4 weeks, 87.5% of patients had discontinued non-IT opioids, and 53% had undetectable (<2 ng/mL) serum opioid concentrations. At 8 weeks, 92% remained off all non-IT opioids and 59% had undetectable serum opioid levels. IT morphine doses >4.2 mg/d were invariably associated with detectable serum levels; with doses <4.2 mg, morphine was undetectable in 80% of subjects. IT hydromorphone doses >6.8 mg/d were detectable in the serum. Using linear mixed model analyses, there were statistically significant decreases in the mean "worst pain," "average pain," and MD Anderson symptom severity and interference scores at 4 and 8 weeks. This change was independent of serum opioid levels; when analyzed separately, there was no difference in the pain scores of subjects with detectable serum opioid levels compared to those with undetectable levels at 4 and 8 weeks. Constipation ranked as "quite a bit" or "very much" decreased from 58.7% to 19.2% of subjects at week 4 (P < .001) and to 37.5% at 8 weeks (P = .23). A very low complication rate was observed. CONCLUSIONS: ITT for cancer pain was associated with a marked reduction in serum opioid concentrations, with the majority of patients having undetectable serum levels. Reducing serum opioid concentrations in cancer patients may have implications with respect to restoring bowel function, improving fatigue, and promoting the integrity of antitumor immune function and warrants further study.

Comparison of postoperative pain between patients who underwent primary and repeated cesarean section: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The differences in post-operative pain are unclear between the primiparas who underwent a primary cesarean section and multiparas who underwent their first repeat cesarean section. The study aimed to explore the possible differences in postoperative pain between primiparas and multiparas. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed only including women who underwent cesarean deliveries under spinal anesthesia. Postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was administered to all subjects with 0.2 mg/kg hydromorphone and 4 mg/kg flurbiprofen; the pump was programmed as 2.0 mL/h background infusion with a loading dose of 1 mL and a lockout period of 15 min. Postoperative incision and visceral pain intensity were evaluated using the visual analogue scale, and inadequate analgesia was defined as a visual analogue scale score ≥ 40 during 48 h post-operation. Additionally, the patients' pain statuses in postoperative week 1 and week 4 were also assessed during follow-up via telephone. RESULTS: From January to May 2017, a total of 168 patients (67 primiparas and 101 multiparas) were included. The relative risk for multiparas to experience inadequate analgesia on incision pain was 0.42 (95% CI: 0.25 to 0.74) compared to primiparas. In patients aged < 30 years, inadequate analgesia on visceral pain was higher in multiparas than in primiparas (RR, 3.56 [1.05 to 12.04], P = 0.025). There was no significant difference in the combined incidence of inadequate analgesia in both types of pain between the multiparas and primiparas (33.7% vs. 40.2%, P = 0.381). No difference was found in PCIA use between the two groups (111.1 ± 36.0 mL vs. 110.9 ± 37.3 mL, P = 0.979). In addition, a significantly higher incidence of pain was noted 4 weeks post-surgery in primiparas than that in multiparas (62.2% vs. 37.7%, P = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Multiparas who underwent their first repeat cesarean section have a lower for inadequate analgesia on incision pain during the first 48 h after surgery than primiparas. Multiparas aged under 30 years may be more prone to experiencing postoperative inadequate analgesia on visceral pain. TRAIL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT03009955 , Date registered: December 30, 2016.