Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 36
Filtrar
1.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 23(8): 85411s3-85411s10, 2024 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39093665

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In the Nordic European Countries, cancer is the leading cause of death. The last decade has brought revolutionizing cancer treatments including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Patients on ICIs have a high risk of developing cutaneous immune-related adverse events. Treating these side effects is of high importance to improve patient's quality of life (QoL) and continue the anti-cancer treatment. METHODS: The Nordic European Cutaneous Oncodermatology Management (NECOM) project develops tools to prevent and treat cancer therapy-related cutaneous adverse events (cAEs). The first 2 NECOM papers presented various cAEs and skincare regimens involving hygiene, moisturization, sun protection, and camouflage products for preventing and managing cAEs. The NECOM 3 practical algorithm was on the prevention and treatment of acute radiation dermatitis. This NECOM 4 practical algorithm is intended to prevent and manage cutaneous immunotherapy-related adverse events (cirAEs), improving cancer patients' QoL and outcomes. RESULTS: The NECOM advisors discussed the results of a systematic literature review and obtained consensus on the evidence and expert opinion-based practical algorithm for cirAEs to support all healthcare providers treating cancer patients in the Nordic European Countries. The algorithm starts with a simple skincare regimen of cleansing, moisturizing, and protection, followed by the exclusion of severe cutaneous adverse reactions, and then specific interventions to treat the most common cirAEs (pruritus, maculopapular eruption, eczematous eruption, psoriasis, lichenoid eruption, and bullous eruption). CONCLUSIONS: CirAEs are the most common side effects induced by ICIs and may lead to cancer treatment interruption or even discontinuation. Patient education on the prevention of cirAEs using a skincare regimen and treatment recommendations given in the NECOM 4 algorithm may help prevent and manage cirAEs and improve the QoL and outcome of patients receiving ICIs. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23:8(Suppl 2):s4-10.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Neoplasias , Qualidade de Vida , Higiene da Pele , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/terapia , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/administração & dosagem , Higiene da Pele/métodos , Higiene da Pele/efeitos adversos , Sobreviventes de Câncer , Imunoterapia/efeitos adversos , Imunoterapia/métodos , Toxidermias/etiologia , Toxidermias/diagnóstico , Toxidermias/prevenção & controle , Toxidermias/terapia , Países Escandinavos e Nórdicos
2.
Pediatr Transplant ; 28(1): e14653, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37990976

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: New-onset allergic diseases, such as food allergy or atopic dermatitis, can develop after allogeneic transplantation. There are limited reports of new-onset atopic dermatitis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children and adolescents, and its treatment is yet to be established. The pathogenesis may differ from typical atopic dermatitis in terms of alloimmunity including graft-versus-host disease. METHODS: We present five children and adolescents with new-onset atopic dermatitis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The characteristics and clinical profiles of skin treatment after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are summarized. RESULTS: Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis included systemic tacrolimus for all patients. After hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, all patients achieved complete donor chimerism of the bone marrow and had acute graft-versus-host disease of the skin. After engraftment, all patients had skin lesions that met the international consensus diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis. None of the patients met the diagnostic criteria for chronic graft-versus-host disease. Topical therapy and skin care based on atopic dermatitis guidelines improved skin condition and atopic dermatitis severity scores in all patients. In addition, type 2 inflammatory markers improved accordingly. CONCLUSION: Topical therapy and skin care may be effective for transplant-related atopic dermatitis after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. When extensive dermatitis is observed after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, this treatment may avoid excessive immunosuppressive therapy if it meets the diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis.


Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Criança , Humanos , Adolescente , Dermatite Atópica/terapia , Dermatite Atópica/complicações , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/etiologia , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/prevenção & controle , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Transplante Homólogo/efeitos adversos , Higiene da Pele/efeitos adversos , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/efeitos adversos
3.
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) ; 12(1): 15-27, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35196892

RESUMO

Significance: Lymphedema is a common, distressing and debilitating condition with various etiologies. Effective diagnosis, assessment, and management rely on evidence-based clinical practice guidelines ("guidelines"). This study aims to describe and compare international guidelines on lymphedema diagnosis, assessment, and management. Recent Advances: The review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). Systematic searches of electronic literature databases and the web were completed in December 2020 for lymphedema guidelines published in English since 2000. Quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE)-II reporting checklist. Synthesis took a narrative approach to compare guideline recommendations and associated levels of evidence. Critical Issues: This systematic review of 1,564 articles and 159 web pages yielded 14 guidelines. All guidelines were from high-income countries. Ten focused exclusively on lymphedema, and four on cancer. Most (n = 13) guidelines recommended an integrated medical, psychological assessment, and physical examination, with a limb volume measurement of >10% in the affected limb compared, confirming a lymphedema diagnosis. Recommended management involved Complex Decongestive Therapy (CDT) followed by self-management using skincare, self-lymphatic drainage massage, exercise, and compression. Future Directions: The underlying etiology of lymphedema appeared to make little difference to guideline recommendations regarding care. High-quality guidelines are available to guide lymphedema care. However, their suitability for low-resource settings is unclear.


Assuntos
Linfedema , Humanos , Linfedema/diagnóstico , Linfedema/etiologia , Linfedema/terapia , Drenagem Linfática Manual/efeitos adversos , Massagem/efeitos adversos , Exercício Físico , Higiene da Pele/efeitos adversos
4.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 21(3): 1171-1177, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33901342

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with rosacea often complained of low tolerance to skincare. AIM: To examine if the preexisted low tolerance to skincare is associated with rosacea the occurrence of the Chinese population. METHODS: A retrospective case-control survey of 997 rosacea cases and 1012 skin-healthy controls was carried out in China. Low tolerance to skincare was evaluated based on the history of facial skin allergic reactions related to skincare in the past 5 years before the onset of rosacea. A comparative analysis was performed between the case and control groups by the chi-square test and the logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: History of facial skin allergic reaction due to skin care products (OR = 5.110, 95% CI = 3.893-6.706) and skin care in beauty salons (OR = 3.002, 95% CI = 1.506-5.981) both presented a positive correlations with the occurrence of rosacea. Facial masks and cosmetics were two of the most common products causing facial allergic reaction. The OR values increased with the increased frequency of allergic reactions related to facial mask and cosmetics. In addition, the history of facial skin allergic reaction had a significantly associated with the severity of self-reported symptoms of rosacea including dryness, burning, stinging and itching. CONCLUSIONS: The condition of low tolerance of the facial skin to skincare was closely associated with the occurrence of rosacea.


Assuntos
Rosácea , Estudos de Casos e Controles , China/epidemiologia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rosácea/diagnóstico , Rosácea/epidemiologia , Higiene da Pele/efeitos adversos
6.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 313(4): 225-234, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32594335

RESUMO

Appropriate skincare is essential in the prevention and management of rosacea. We sought to investigate whether cleansing habits, the initial step of skin care, would influence the onset and progression of rosacea and their associations with clinical features of rosacea in the Chinese population. We analyzed the daily cleansing habits data collected from 999 rosacea cases and 1010 skin-healthy controls from China. Overall, the high frequency of cleansing (more than once daily) (OR = 1.450) and the large amount of cleansers (> 5 pieces/year) (OR = 1.612) presented a positive correlation with rosacea occurring. The cleansing duration and types of cleansers appeared not to be correlated with the onset of rosacea in this study. Significant risk factors also included the deep cleansing habits, such as the overuse of cleansing tool (more than four times/week) (OR 2.179) and oil control and exfoliating behaviors via daily used products (OR 2.435), facial mask (OR 1.459) or projects in beauty salons (OR 2.688). The analysis of the clinical features of rosacea showed that patients who prefer deep cleansing were more prone to present an initial symptom of papule and pustule (OR 1.63-3.15). What is more, using daily exfoliating products presented a positive correlation with the progression of the symptoms from flushing to erythema (OR = 2.01), papule and pustule (OR = 2.28) and telangiectasis (OR = 2.14), and the affected areas from a single area to pan facial (OR = 1.650). In conclusion, excessive cleansing habits were substantial risk factors for the incidence and progression of rosacea in the Chinese population.


Assuntos
Técnicas Cosméticas/efeitos adversos , Cosméticos/efeitos adversos , Rosácea/epidemiologia , Higiene da Pele/efeitos adversos , Adulto , China/epidemiologia , Técnicas Cosméticas/instrumentação , Técnicas Cosméticas/estatística & dados numéricos , Cosméticos/administração & dosagem , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Rosácea/diagnóstico , Rosácea/etiologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Higiene da Pele/instrumentação , Higiene da Pele/métodos , Higiene da Pele/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
7.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 19(12): 1181-1183, 2020 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33346506

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with sensitive skin find topical retinoid use for anti-aging purposes challenging due to irritation. Bakuchiol, a meroterpene from the Psoralea corylifolia seed, has retinol functionality through retinol-like regulation of gene expression. OBJECTIVE: This research examined the tolerability, efficacy, and barrier effects of a nature-based bakuchiol-containing cleanser and moisturizer in subjects with sensitive skin. METHODS: 60 female subjects Fitzpatrick skin types I–V age 40–65 years with sensitive mild to moderate photodamaged skin were enrolled in this 4 week study. A sensitive skin panel was constructed: 1/3 eczema/atopic dermatitis, 1/3 rosacea, 1/3 cosmetic intolerance syndrome. Subjects used a nature-based cleanser and moisturizer twice daily and underwent transepidermal water loss (TEWL), corneometry, tolerability assessments, and efficacy assessments at baseline, 5–10 minutes post-application, and week 4. RESULTS: The skin care products were well tolerated and efficacious (P<0.001) in terms of investigator assessed improvement in visual smoothness, tactile smoothness, clarity, radiance, overall appearance, and global anti-aging. Cheek corneometry measurements demonstrated a statistically significant 16% increase in skin moisture content (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: A bakuchiol nature-based anti-aging moisturizer is well tolerated and effective in individuals with sensitive skin.J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(12): doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.5522.


Assuntos
Cosmecêuticos/administração & dosagem , Emolientes/administração & dosagem , Fenóis/administração & dosagem , Envelhecimento da Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Pele/imunologia , Administração Tópica , Adulto , Idoso , Bochecha , Cosmecêuticos/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Atópica/complicações , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Dermatite Atópica/imunologia , Emolientes/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fenóis/efeitos adversos , Rosácea/complicações , Rosácea/tratamento farmacológico , Rosácea/imunologia , Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Pele/efeitos da radiação , Envelhecimento da Pele/efeitos da radiação , Higiene da Pele/efeitos adversos , Higiene da Pele/métodos , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos , Perda Insensível de Água/efeitos dos fármacos , Perda Insensível de Água/imunologia
8.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 19(12): 1209-1214, 2020 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33346522

RESUMO

Skin activities follow endogenous circadian rhythms resulting in differences between daytime and nighttime properties. To address the variations in skin needs, a novel circadian-based dual serum system (LVS) was developed. A 12-week, double-blind, randomized, regimen-controlled, multi-center study was conducted to assess the efficacy and tolerability of LVS on subjects presenting with moderate-severe photodamage. 61 Female subjects (36–65 years; Fitzpatrick skin types I–VI) completed the study. The active group received LVS (daytime serum and nighttime serum) and basic skin care regimen (moisturizer and SPF 35 sunscreen), while the control group received the basic skin care regimen only. In addition to clinical grading, subject self-assessment questionnaires, and standardized photography, punch biopsies were taken in a subset of subjects for immunohistochemistry. Additionally, swab samples were taken for skin surface oxidation analysis. Significant improvements over control were observed in the active group in Radiance (weeks 4, 8, and 12), Overall Photodamage, Tactile Toughness, and Global Fine Lines/Wrinkles (week 12). Biopsy results, skin swab analysis and standardized photographs support the clinical grading findings. At all follow-up visits, LVS was consistently highly rated over control by subjects, with a significant proportion of subjects agreeing at week 12 that LVS “improved the radiance of my skin,” and “improved the overall health and look of my skin”. Results from this study suggest that LVS may provide essential protective and reparative effects to skin exposed to the damaging effects of environmental factors, and also demonstrates the value of including skin circadian rhythm-based concepts in a topical skincare regimen. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(12): doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.5355.


Assuntos
Antioxidantes/administração & dosagem , Cronofarmacoterapia , Envelhecimento da Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Higiene da Pele/métodos , Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Administração Cutânea , Adulto , Idoso , Antioxidantes/efeitos adversos , Biópsia , Autoavaliação Diagnóstica , Método Duplo-Cego , Face/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fotografação , Fotoperíodo , Pele/diagnóstico por imagem , Pele/patologia , Higiene da Pele/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
PLoS One ; 15(4): e0231078, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32339170

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Certain cosmetic habits may trigger or aggravate rosacea, while there is little published epidemiologic evidence to support this point. PURPOSE: To examine if daily skin care habits have an effect on the development of rosacea in Chinese population. METHODS: A multi-center retrospective case-control survey of 1,245 rosacea cases and 1,538 skin-healthy controls was conducted in China. Participants completed the questionnaire comprised of demographic characteristics, socioeconomic data and daily skin care habits. Data were collected retrospectively and analyzed using the chi-square test and t-test. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to predict rosacea. RESULTS: The multivariate logistic regression analysis highlighted some results: Dry, oily or mixed skin (OR = 6.3-6.9, P< .001), the usage of foaming cleanser (OR = 1.45, 95%CI 1.115-1.886, P = .01), make up more than 6 times a week (OR = 2.839, 95%CI 1.962-4.108, P< .001), using facial mask more than 4 times a week (OR = 2.56-3.069, P< .001), facial treatments at beauty salon more than once a week (OR = 4.946, 95%CI 2.005-12.198, P = .0018) and using beauty salon products (OR = 2.334, 95%CI 1.435-3.976, P = .0018) are positively correlated with the development of rosacea. Using of moisturizing products (OR = 0.602, 95%CI 0.386-0.983, P = .035) and sunscreen cream (OR = 0.303-0.507, P< .001 or P = .0167 for different frequency) presented significantly negative correlations with rosacea. Frequency of cleansing showed a nonlinear association with rosacea: using facial cleansers 1~3 times per week (OR = 0.647, 95%CI 0.429-0.975, P = .038) showed beneficial effects while using facial cleanser excessively (twice or more daily) (OR = 2.131, 95%CI 1.394-3.256, P< .001) positively correlated to rosacea strongly. CONCLUSIONS: Excessive use of facial cleanser (twice or more a day) and facial mask (more than 4 times a week), frequent makeup (more than 6 times a week), regular skin care in beauty salon (more than once a week), and using beauty salon products were closely correlated to the development of rosacea in Chinese population.


Assuntos
Cosméticos/efeitos adversos , Face/patologia , Rosácea/epidemiologia , Dermatopatias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , China/epidemiologia , Feminino , Hábitos , Humanos , Masculino , Análise de Regressão , Rosácea/etiologia , Rosácea/patologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Pele/patologia , Higiene da Pele/efeitos adversos , Dermatopatias/etiologia , Dermatopatias/patologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
10.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 18(6): 1686-1692, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30803131

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Consensus guidelines advocate general skincare for rosacea patients. OBJECTIVES: Two independent studies were performed to assess whether a tinted daily SPF-30 facial moisturizer (DFM30) improves barrier function of dry skin and the efficacy and tolerability of DFM30 on rosacea-prone skin. METHODS: In study 1, electrical capacitance (EC) and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) were measured at baseline, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours after a single application of DFM30 and on a control site in 21 healthy females with dry skin. Study 2 evaluated 33 females with mild to moderate rosacea and nontransient erythema. Efficacy and tolerability after once-daily DFM30 were assessed using a chromameter, image analysis of photographs, and trained rater and patient evaluations up to day 22. RESULTS: In study 1, EC showed statistically significant increases at 2, 4, and 8 hours, and TEWL showed statistically significant decreases 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours after DFM30 application to healthy females compared to baseline. In study 2, covering skin redness improved significantly after DFM30 application on day 1; 33.3% showed improved covering skin redness compared to baseline. Patients reported significantly less redness on day 8 than day 3. Feelings of dryness and tightness/tension were lower 30 minutes after first application. Feeling of dryness was lower than baseline after 3 days, 1 and 3 weeks. Image analysis suggested redness was significantly lower on day 22 compared to baseline. Chromameter readings showed significantly lower erythema on the cheek compared to baseline. All patients stated that DFM30 relieves and neutralizes visible redness who also indicated that they would purchase DFM30, and the product was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: These studies show that DFM30 is suitable as part of the skincare regimens advocated by ROSacea COnsensus (ROSCO) for rosacea patients. DFM30 is an effective moisturizer that improves cutaneous barrier function and the appearance of rosacea-prone skin.


Assuntos
Fármacos Dermatológicos/administração & dosagem , Eritema/tratamento farmacológico , Rosácea/tratamento farmacológico , Higiene da Pele/métodos , Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efeitos adversos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/química , Eritema/diagnóstico , Eritema/etiologia , Face , Feminino , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Rosácea/complicações , Rosácea/diagnóstico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Pele/diagnóstico por imagem , Pele/metabolismo , Higiene da Pele/efeitos adversos , Creme para a Pele/administração & dosagem , Creme para a Pele/efeitos adversos , Creme para a Pele/química , Fator de Proteção Solar , Resultado do Tratamento , Perda Insensível de Água/efeitos dos fármacos , Adulto Jovem
11.
Support Care Cancer ; 27(4): 1471-1480, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30343411

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To assess the effectiveness and safety of a product containing diosmin, coumarin, and arbutin (Linfadren®) in addition to complex decongestive therapy (CDT) on the management of patients with a breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). METHODS: Fifty outpatients (average age of 56.2 ± 2.7 years, range 28-71) with a BCRL were enrolled for this study. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive either CDT consisting of skin care, manual lymphatic drainage, remedial exercises, and elastic compression garment (control group, n = 25) or CDT plus Linfadren® (study group, n = 25). Patients were evaluated before and after treatment and 3 months after the end of treatment. Primary outcomes were reduction of upper limb excess volume (EV) and percentage reduction of excess volume (%REV). Secondary outcomes were improvement in Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire, and patient's perception of treatment effectiveness (PPTE). RESULTS: Addition of Linfadren® to CDT yielded an additional reduction of primary outcomes both after treatment (EV, - 521 ml vs. - 256 ml, P < 0.0001; %REV, - 66.4% vs. - 34%, P = 0.02) and at 3-month follow-up (EV, - 59 ml vs. + 24 ml, P < 0.0001; %REV, - 73.6% vs. - 31.4%, P = 0.004). Moreover, statistically significant differences were found between the two groups for the secondary outcomes after treatment (QuickDASH, P = 0.006; PPTE, P = 0.03) and at 3-month follow-up (QuickDASH, P = 0.006; PPTE, P = 0.02). No patient showed adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Linfadren® in addition to CDT was a safe and effective therapy for reducing BCRL and was better than CDT alone.


Assuntos
Arbutina/administração & dosagem , Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama/terapia , Cumarínicos/administração & dosagem , Diosmina/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Idoso , Arbutina/efeitos adversos , Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama/epidemiologia , Terapia Combinada/efeitos adversos , Bandagens Compressivas/efeitos adversos , Cumarínicos/efeitos adversos , Diosmina/efeitos adversos , Drenagem/efeitos adversos , Drenagem/métodos , Terapia por Exercício/efeitos adversos , Terapia por Exercício/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Massagem/efeitos adversos , Massagem/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Higiene da Pele/efeitos adversos , Higiene da Pele/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Extremidade Superior
12.
Nutrients ; 10(4)2018 Mar 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29587342

RESUMO

The skin is the body's largest organ, it participates in sensitivity and offers protection against microorganisms, chemicals and ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Consequently, the skin may suffer alterations such as photo-ageing, immune dysfunction and inflammation which may significantly affect human health. Nutraceuticals represent a promising strategy for preventing, delaying, or minimising premature ageing of the skin and also to alleviate certain skin disorders. Among them, bioactive peptides and oligosaccharides, plant polyphenols, carotenoids, vitamins and polyunsaturated fatty acids are the most widely used ingredients. Supplementation with these products has shown evidence of having an effect on the signs of ageing and protection against UV radiation ageing in several human trials. In this review, the most relevant human studies on skin nutraceuticals are evaluated and the statistical resolution, biological relevance of their results, and, the trial protocols are discussed. In conclusion, quality and rigorousness of the trials must be improved to build credible scientific evidence for skin nutraceuticals and to establish a cause-effect relationship between the ingredients the beneficial effects for the skin.


Assuntos
Suplementos Nutricionais , Envelhecimento da Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Higiene da Pele/métodos , Dermatopatias/tratamento farmacológico , Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Suplementos Nutricionais/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Fatores de Risco , Pele/patologia , Pele/efeitos da radiação , Higiene da Pele/efeitos adversos , Dermatopatias/etiologia , Dermatopatias/patologia , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Raios Ultravioleta/efeitos adversos
13.
Environ Health Perspect ; 126(2): 027011, 2018 02 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29467107

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Many personal care products include chemicals that might act as endocrine disruptors and thus increase the risk of breast cancer. OBJECTIVE: We examined the association between usage patterns of beauty, hair, and skin-related personal care products and breast cancer incidence in the Sister Study, a national prospective cohort study (enrollment 2003-2009). METHODS: Non-Hispanic black (4,452) and white women (n=42,453) were examined separately using latent class analysis (LCA) to identify groups of individuals with similar patterns of self-reported product use in three categories (beauty, skin, hair). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between product use and breast cancer incidence. RESULTS: A total of 2,326 women developed breast cancer during follow-up (average follow-up=5.4y). Among black women, none of the latent class hazard ratios was elevated, but there were <100 cases in any category, limiting power. Among white women, those classified as "moderate" and "frequent" users of beauty products had increased risk of breast cancer relative to "infrequent" users [HR=1.13 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.27) and HR=1.15 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.30), respectively]. Frequent users of skincare products also had increased risk of breast cancer relative to infrequent users [HR=1.13 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.29)]. None of the hair product classes was associated with increased breast cancer risk. The associations with beauty and skin products were stronger in postmenopausal women than in premenopausal women, but not significantly so. CONCLUSIONS: This work generates novel hypotheses about personal care product use and breast cancer risk. Whether these results are due to specific chemicals or to other correlated behaviors needs to be evaluated. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP1480.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Cosméticos/administração & dosagem , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/etnologia , Neoplasias da Mama/etiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Cosméticos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Preparações para Cabelo/administração & dosagem , Preparações para Cabelo/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Incidência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pós-Menopausa , Pré-Menopausa , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Higiene da Pele/efeitos adversos
14.
Dermatol Surg ; 42(3): 277-85, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26918966

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Enlarged skin pores refer to conditions that present with visible topographic changes of skin surfaces. Although not a medical concern, enlarged pores are a cosmetic concern for a large number of individuals. Moreover, clear definition and possible causes of enlarged pores have not been elucidated. OBJECTIVE: To review the possible causes and treatment options for skin pores. METHODS: This article is based on a review of the medical literature and the authors' clinical experience in investigating and treating skin pores. RESULTS: There are 3 major clinical causes of enlarged facial pores, namely high sebum excretion, decreased elasticity around pores, and increased hair follicle volume. In addition, chronic recurrent acne, sex hormones, and skin care regimen can affect pore size. Given the different possible causes for enlarged pores, therapeutic modalities must be individualized for each patient. CONCLUSION: Potential factors that contribute to enlarged skin pores include excessive sebum, decreased elasticity around pores, and increased hair follicle volume. Because various factors cause enlarged facial pores, it might be useful to identify the underlying causes to be able to select the appropriate treatment.


Assuntos
Dermatoses Faciais/etiologia , Dermatoses Faciais/terapia , Folículo Piloso/patologia , Acne Vulgar/complicações , Técnicas Cosméticas , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Dieta , Elasticidade , Dermatoses Faciais/fisiopatologia , Hormônios Esteroides Gonadais/metabolismo , Remoção de Cabelo , Humanos , Terapia a Laser , Tamanho do Órgão , Sebo/metabolismo , Higiene da Pele/efeitos adversos , Terminologia como Assunto
15.
Br J Dermatol ; 174(2): 371-9, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26480304

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Formaldehyde is a well-known contact sensitizer. Formaldehyde releasers are widely used preservatives in skincare products. It has been found that formaldehyde at concentrations allowed by the European Cosmetics Directive can cause allergic contact dermatitis. However, we still lack information on whether formaldehyde at low concentrations affects dermatitis in formaldehyde-allergic individuals. OBJECTIVES: To study the effects of low concentrations of formaldehyde on irritant contact dermatitis in formaldehyde-allergic individuals. METHODS: Fifteen formaldehyde-allergic individuals and a control group of 12 individuals without contact allergy to formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers were included in the study. The individuals performed the repeated open application test (ROAT) during 4 weeks with four different moisturizers releasing formaldehyde in concentrations that had been determined as > 40, 20-40, 2·5-10 and 0 p.p.m. by the chromotropic acid (CA) spot test. Dimethyloldimethylhydantoin was used as a formaldehyde releaser in the moisturizers. The ROAT was performed on areas of experimentally induced sodium lauryl sulfate dermatitis. The study was double blind, controlled and randomized. RESULTS: Nine of the 15 formaldehyde-allergic individuals had reappearance or worsening of dermatitis on the areas that were treated with moisturizers containing formaldehyde. No such reactions were observed in the control group (P < 0·001) or for the moisturizers without formaldehyde in the formaldehyde-allergic individuals (P < 0·001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that the low concentrations of formaldehyde often found in skincare products by the CA method are sufficient to worsen an existing dermatitis in formaldehyde-allergic individuals.


Assuntos
Dermatite Irritante/etiologia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/etiologia , Formaldeído/efeitos adversos , Conservantes Farmacêuticos/efeitos adversos , Higiene da Pele/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Colorimetria/métodos , Cosméticos/efeitos adversos , Cosméticos/química , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Formaldeído/análise , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Naftalenossulfonatos/metabolismo , Testes do Emplastro , Conservantes Farmacêuticos/análise
16.
Int J Toxicol ; 31(5 Suppl): 245S-60S, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23064775

RESUMO

Propylene glycol is an aliphatic alcohol that functions as a skin conditioning agent, viscosity decreasing agent, solvent, and fragrance ingredient in cosmetics. Tripropylene glycol functions as a humectant, antioxidant, and emulsion stabilizer. Polypropylene glycols (PPGs), including PPG-3, PPG-7, PPG-9, PPG-12, PPG-13, PPG-15, PPG-16, PPG-17, PPG-20, PPG-26, PPG-30, PPG-33, PPG-34, PPG-51, PPG-52, and PPG-69, function primarily as skin conditioning agents, with some solvent use. The majority of the safety and toxicity information presented is for propylene glycol (PG). Propylene glycol is generally nontoxic and is noncarcinogenic. Clinical studies demonstrated an absence of dermal sensitization at use concentrations, although concerns about irritation remained. The CIR Expert Panel determined that the available information support the safety of tripropylene glycol as well as all the PPGs. The Expert Panel concluded that PG, tripropylene glycol, and PPGs ≥3 are safe as used in cosmetic formulations when formulated to be nonirritating.


Assuntos
Qualidade de Produtos para o Consumidor , Cosméticos/química , Fármacos Dermatológicos/toxicidade , Polímeros/toxicidade , Propilenoglicol/toxicidade , Propilenoglicóis/toxicidade , Administração Cutânea , Animais , Antioxidantes/administração & dosagem , Antioxidantes/química , Antioxidantes/farmacocinética , Antioxidantes/toxicidade , Cosméticos/toxicidade , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administração & dosagem , Fármacos Dermatológicos/química , Fármacos Dermatológicos/farmacocinética , Humanos , Polímeros/administração & dosagem , Polímeros/química , Polímeros/farmacocinética , Propilenoglicol/administração & dosagem , Propilenoglicol/química , Propilenoglicol/farmacocinética , Propilenoglicóis/administração & dosagem , Propilenoglicóis/química , Propilenoglicóis/farmacocinética , Higiene da Pele/efeitos adversos , Testes de Toxicidade , Viscosidade
19.
Support Care Cancer ; 19(4): 545-54, 2011 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20336328

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to evaluate quality of life (QoL) and tolerability of three articles specifically developed for cancer skin care management (skin moisturizer, face moisturizer, and face wash). METHODS: Participants were cancer patients (n = 99) receiving systemic anticancer therapies and/or radiotherapy at Northwestern University. Subjects were assessed at the initial visit for adverse skin reactions based on the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 and completed the Skindex-16 questionnaire, a self-reported dermatology-specific QoL instrument. All subjects were provided with three test articles and were instructed to use each test article once daily for 4 weeks. At the 4-week follow-up (n = 77), the Skindex-16 was readministered, adverse skin reactions were assessed, and tolerability questionnaires were administered for each article used. RESULTS: Dry skin, hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR), and skin rash (dermatitis) decreased significantly from baseline to follow-up. Presence of nail changes, skin rash (desquamation), and acne/acneiform eruptions did not significantly change from baseline. Subjects had a significantly lower mean overall Skindex-16 score at 4-week follow-up when compared to baseline. Most patients rated their overall experience with each test article as good or very good (highest rating). CONCLUSION: Skin care in cancer patients is suboptimal in part due to a lack of products and knowledge specific for this population. Our findings suggest that QoL improves with test article use, all of which were rated as good/very good for tolerability. Moreover, skin toxicity as manifested by dry skin, hand-foot skin reaction, and skin rash (dermatitis) were decreased with use of test articles within 4 weeks.


Assuntos
Neoplasias/terapia , Qualidade de Vida , Higiene da Pele/métodos , Dermatopatias/etiologia , Emolientes/administração & dosagem , Emolientes/efeitos adversos , Face , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Satisfação do Paciente , Higiene da Pele/efeitos adversos , Dermatopatias/patologia , Sabões/efeitos adversos , Inquéritos e Questionários
20.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 9(12): 1480-7, 2010 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21120255

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This 12-week, double-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical usage study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of a novel topical, multi-ingredient, polyphenol, high antioxidant skin care system (facial wash, day lotion, night crème and eye serum) to reduce the appearance of photoaging. METHODS: A total of 40 Caucasian female participants were randomly assigned to apply the test regimen or control regimen for 12 weeks. One group washed with the test antioxidant facial wash twice daily, applied the test antioxidant day lotion each morning and the test antioxidant night creme and eye serum each evening. The second group washed with a control facial wash twice daily and applied a control moisturizer each morning and evening. Clinical evaluations for efficacy were made by a board-certified dermatologist at baseline and after six and 12 weeks of product use. Efficacy was also measured by subjects' self-assessments and via photography and instrumentation. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Overall, the results of the study showed that the test regimen produced statistically significant improvements in the appearance of photodamaged skin. Most impressive was the significantly greater improvements produced by the test regimen over the control regimen for nearly every grading parameter. The results from this study demonstrate that this high Total ORACsc scoring antioxidant skin care system was well tolerated, with no adverse events reported by the participants during the course of the study, and improved, significantly greater than a control regimen, the appearance of wrinkles, firmness, hyperpigmentation, blotchy redness, tactile roughness and clarity in photodamaged skin. Post-baseline clinical grading scores, silicone replica parameters, cutometer and corneometer scores were statistically compared to baseline using a paired t test at the P?0.05 significance level.


Assuntos
Antioxidantes/uso terapêutico , Flavonoides/uso terapêutico , Hiperpigmentação/tratamento farmacológico , Fenóis/uso terapêutico , Extratos Vegetais/uso terapêutico , Envelhecimento da Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Higiene da Pele/métodos , Administração Tópica , Antioxidantes/efeitos adversos , Coffea , Método Duplo-Cego , Emolientes , Face , Feminino , Flavonoides/efeitos adversos , Frutas , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fenóis/efeitos adversos , Fitoterapia , Extratos Vegetais/efeitos adversos , Polifenóis , Pele , Higiene da Pele/efeitos adversos , Verduras
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA