Incidence and risk factors of abdominal compartment syndrome in pediatric oncology patients: a prospective cohort study.

Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) has been the subject of increasing research over the past decade owing to its effects on morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. This study aimed to determine the incidence and risk factors of ACS in patients in an onco-hematological pediatric intensive care unit in a middle-income country and to analyze patient outcomes. This prospective cohort study was conducted between May 2015 and October 2017. Altogether, 253 patients were admitted to the PICU, and 54 fulfilled the inclusion criteria for intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) measurements. IAP was measured using the intra-bladder indirect technique with a closed system (AbViser AutoValve®, Wolfle Tory Medical Inc., USA) in patients with clinical indications for indwelling bladder catheterization. Definitions from the World Society for ACS were used. The data were entered into a database and analyzed. The median age was 5.79 years, and the median pediatric risk of mortality score was 7.1. The incidence of ACS was 27.7%. Fluid resuscitation was a significant risk factor for ACS in the univariate analysis. The mortality rates in the ACS and non-ACS groups were 46.6% and 17.9%, respectively (P < 0.05). This is the first study of ACS in critically ill children with cancer.   Conclusion: The incidence and mortality rates were high, justifying IAP measurement in children with ACS risk factors.

Intra-abdominal pressure during and after cardiac surgery: a single-centre prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: While intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) has been associated with adverse outcomes in multiple settings, the epidemiology and clinical implications of IAH in the context of cardiac surgery are less known. In this study, we aimed to describe the prevalence of IAH in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and determine its association with patient characteristics and postoperative outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre prospective cohort study in which intra-abdominal pressure was measured in the operating room after general anesthesia (T1), after the surgical procedure (T2), and two hours after intensive care unit (ICU) admission (T3) in a subset of patients. Intra-abdominal hypertension was defined as intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) ≥ 12 mm Hg. Postoperative outcomes included death, acute kidney injury (AKI), and length of stay in the ICU and hospital. RESULTS: A total of 513 IAP measurements were obtained from 191 participants in the operating room and 131 participants in the ICU. Intra-abdominal hypertension was present in 105/191 (55%) at T1, 115/191 (60%) at T2, and 31/131 (24%) at T3. Intra-abdominal pressure was independently associated with body mass index, central venous pressure, and mean pulmonary artery pressure but was not associated with cumulative fluid balance. Intraoperative IAH was not associated with adverse outcomes including AKI. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-abdominal hypertension is very common during cardiac surgery but its clinical implications are uncertain.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Bien que l'hypertension intra-abdominale (HIA) ait été associée à des issues indésirables dans de multiples contextes, l'épidémiologie et les implications cliniques de l'HIA dans le contexte de la chirurgie cardiaque sont moins connues. Dans cette étude, nous avons cherché à décrire la prévalence de l'HIA chez les patients bénéficiant d'une chirurgie cardiaque et à déterminer son association avec les caractéristiques des patients et les issues postopératoires. MéTHODE: Nous avons mené une étude de cohorte prospective monocentrique dans laquelle la pression intra-abdominale a été mesurée en salle d'opération après une anesthésie générale (T1), après l'intervention chirurgicale (T2) et deux heures après l'admission à l'unité de soins intensifs (USI) (T3) dans un sous-ensemble de patients. L'hypertension intra-abdominale a été définie comme une pression intra-abdominale (PIA) ≥ 12 mmHg. Les issues postopératoires comprenaient le décès, l'insuffisance rénale aiguë (IRA), et la durée du séjour à l'USI et à l'hôpital. RéSULTATS: Au total, 513 mesures de la PIA ont été obtenues auprès de 191 participants en salle d'opération et de 131 participants à l'USI. L'hypertension intra-abdominale était présente chez 105/191 patients (55 %) à T1, 115/191 (60 %) à T2 et 31/131 (24 %) à T3. La pression intra-abdominale était indépendamment associée à l'indice de masse corporelle, à la pression veineuse centrale et à la pression artérielle pulmonaire moyenne, mais n'était pas associée à un bilan hydrique cumulatif. L'HIA peropératoire n'était pas associée à des issues indésirables, y compris à l'IRA. CONCLUSION: L'hypertension intra-abdominale est très fréquente lors d'une chirurgie cardiaque, mais ses implications cliniques sont incertaines.

Prevalence of intra-abdominal hypertension and markers for associated complications among severe burn patients: a multicenter prospective cohort study (BURNIAH study).

PURPOSE: Severely burned patients are at risk for intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and associated complications such as organ failure, abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS), and death. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of IAH among severely burned patients. The secondary aim was to determine the value of urinary intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP) as early marker for IAH-associated complications. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed in two burn centers in the Netherlands. Fifty-eight patients with burn injuries ≥ 15% of total body surface area (TBSA) were included. Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and urinary I-FABP, measured every 6 h during 72 h. Prevalence of IAH, new organ failure and ACS, and the value of urinary intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP) as early marker for IAH-associated complications were determined. RESULTS: Thirty-one (53%) patients developed IAH, 17 (29%) patients developed new organ failure, but no patients developed ACS. Patients had burns of 29% (P25-P75 19-42%) TBSA. Ln-transformed levels of urinary I-FABP and IAP were inversely correlated with an estimate of - 0.06 (95% CI - 0.10 to - 0.02; p = 0.002). Maximal urinary I-FABP levels had a fair discriminatory ability for patients with IAH with an area under the ROC curve of 74% (p = 0.001). Urinary I-FABP levels had no predictive value for IAH or new organ failure in severe burn patients. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of IAH among patients with ≥ 15% TBSA burned was 53%. None of the patients developed ACS. A relevant diagnostic or predictive value of I-FABP levels in identifying patients at risk for IAH-related complications, could not be demonstrated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, epidemiologic and diagnostic prospective observational study.

The role of Cushing's reflex and the vasopressin-mediated oligoanuric response to intracranial hypertension in patients with abdominal compartment syndrome.

BACKGROUND: We examined the link between increased intra-abdominal pressure, intracranial pressure, and vasopressin release as a potential mechanism. Intra-abdominal pressure, produced by abdominal-cavity insufflation with carbon dioxide (CO2) during laparoscopic abdominal procedures to facilitate visualization, is associated with various complications, including arterial hypertension and oliguria. METHODS: Mean arterial pressure, optic nerve sheath diameter, measured as a proxy for intracranial pressure, plasma vasopressin, serum and urine osmolarity, and urine output were measured 4 times during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in 42 patients: before insufflation with CO2 (T0); after insufflation to 15 cm water (H2O) pressure, with 5 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure (T1); after positive end-expiratory pressure was raised to 10 cm H2O (T2); and after a return to the baseline state (T3). Mean values at T0 to T3 and the directional consistency of changes (increase/decrease/ unchanged) were compared among the 4 data-collection points. RESULTS: Statistically significant elevations (all P ≤ .001) were noted from T0 to T1 and from T0 to T2 in mean arterial pressure, optic nerve sheath diameter, and vasopressin, followed by decreases at T3. For optic nerve sheath diameter and vasopressin, the increases at T1 and T2 occurred in 98% and 100% of patients, ultimately exceeding normal levels in 88 and 97%, respectively. Conversely, urine output fell from T0 to T1 and T2 by 60.9 and 73.4%, decreasing in 88.1% of patients (all P < .001). Patients with class II obesity exhibited statistically greater increases in optic nerve sheath diameter and vasopressin, but statistically less impact on urine output, than patients with class III obesity. CONCLUSION: Increased mean arterial pressure, intracranial pressure, and vasopressin release appear to be intermediary steps between increased intra-abdominal pressure and oliguria. Further research is necessary to determine any causative links between these physiological changes.

Risk Factors for Abdominal Compartment Syndrome After Endovascular Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Case Control Study.

OBJECTIVE: Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) are treated by endovascular aneurysm repair (rEVAR) increasingly often. Despite rEVAR being a minimally invasive method, abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) remains a significant post-operative threat. The aim of this study was to investigate risk factors for ACS after rEVAR, including aortic morphological features. METHODS: The Swedish vascular registry (Swedvasc) was assessed for ACS after rEVAR in the period 2008 - 2015. All patients identified were compared with controls (i.e., patients who did not develop ACS after rEVAR), matched by centre and repair date. Case records were reviewed, and radiology images analysed in a core laboratory. Comparisons were performed with respect to physiological and radiological risk factors. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 40 patients with ACS and 68 controls. Pre-operatively, patients with ACS had a lower blood pressure (BP) than controls (median 70 mmHg vs. 97 mmHg; p < .001). Intra-operatively, they had aortic balloon occlusion more often (55.0% vs. 10.3%; p < .001) and received more transfusions than controls (median nine units of packed red blood cells [pRBC] vs. two units; p < .001). Ninety-seven per cent of those who developed ACS had a pre-operative BP < 70 mmHg, aortic balloon occlusion, or received more than five pRBC unit transfusions. Treatment outside the instructions for use did not differ between patients and controls (57.5% vs. 54.4%; p = .84), and neither did the pre-operative patency of the inferior mesenteric artery (57.1% vs. 63.9%; p = .52) nor the number of visible lumbar arteries on pre-operative imaging (2 vs. 4; p = .014). In multivariable logistic regression, the number of intra-operative transfusions were predictive of ACS (p < .001), while pre-operative hypotension (p = .32) and aortic balloon occlusion (p = .018) were not. CONCLUSION: ACS after rEVAR is mainly associated with physiological factors and is unlikely to develop without the presence of a pre-operative BP < 70 mmHg, the need for an aortic occlusion balloon, or more than five intra-operative pRBC unit transfusions. Treatment outside the IFU or any other morphological factor were not associated with a risk of ACS.

Intra-abdominal hypertension and increased acute kidney injury risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The present meta-analysis aimed to determine the relationship between intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and an increased prevalence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and identify the associated risk factors in various patient populations, regardless of whether they were admitted to an intensive care unit. METHODS: We used three databases for the following search terms: "IAH," "abdominal compartment syndrome," "AKI," "acute kidney failure," and others. The articles retrieved were compared to identify appropriate studies published until 7 May 2020. The main outcome was AKI. RESULTS: Six studies with 344 individuals were included. The patients were divided into two main groups: the IAH and non-IAH groups. Compared with patients without IAH, patients with IAH had a higher risk of AKI (odds ratio = 2.57, 95% confidence interval: 1.55-4.26). In the subgroup and meta-regression analyses, body mass index, age, the presence or absence of burns, and cardiac surgery did not affect the risk of AKI. CONCLUSION: IAH was associated with AKI risk, and this association was not influenced by age, body mass index, the presence or absence of burns, or cardiac surgery.

Intra-abdominal hypertension, fluid balance, and adverse outcomes after orthotopic liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) is frequently encountered in critically ill surgical patients. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of IAH after orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) and its impact on organ function, hospital length-of-stay (LOS), and death. METHODS: This prospective, observational, cohort study evaluated consecutive adult patients admitted in the ICU after undergoing OLT. Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) was measured every 4-6 h for 3 days. Worsening IAP was defined as a gradual increase in IAP over a period of time. Daily fluid balance was the daily sum of all intakes minus the output. RESULTS: IAH was observed in 48% of the patients within the first 3 days after ICU admission, while ACS was diagnosed in 15%. Patients with IAH had a higher positive fluid balance at day 1 (1764 mL [812-2733 mL] vs. 1301 mL [241-1904 mL], p = 0.025). Worsening IAH was associated with fewer days free of organ dysfunction. IAH within 72 h after ICU admission was independently associated with a composite outcome of death or a longer ICU LOS (odds ratio 2.9; CI 95% 1.02-8.25, p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: After OLT, nearly half of the patients presented IAH, that was associated with unfavorable outcomes.

Predictive risk factors for intra-abdominal hypertension after cardiac surgery.

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was is it possible to identify predictive risk factors for the development of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) or abdominal compartment syndrome after cardiac surgery. Altogether 131 papers were found using the reported search, of which 7 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. A total of 755 patients were included, with the incidence of IAH between 26.9% and 83.3%. The limited evidence on IAH after cardiac surgery should be interpreted with caution. Obesity is a strong predictor of postoperative IAH, although not confined to a central pattern and body mass index is correlated with intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). Prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp time predisposed to IAH in 4 cohorts. IAH in cardiac surgery patients is associated with hepatic and renal impairment, and corresponding biochemical markers may be helpful in screening, although lacking specificity. In contrast to the development of IAH in other settings, the evidence for the role of fluid balance is poor. Accurate prediction of IAH remains elusive. Based on the available evidence, routine IAP measurement should be considered postoperatively in patients with obesity, particularly those with renal or hepatic impairment, prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass or operative time, requiring vasopressor support, to prevent the deleterious effects of IAH.

Intestinal fatty acid binding protein as a predictor for intra-abdominal pressure-related complications in patients admitted to the intensive care unit; a prospective cohort study (I-Fabulous study).

PURPOSE: Critically ill patients are at risk for intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and related complications such as organ failure, abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS), and death. This study aimed to determine the value of urinary and serum intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP) levels as early marker for IAH-associated complications. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted in two academic institutional mixed medical-surgical ICUs in the Netherlands. Adult patients admitted to the ICU with two or more risk factors for IAH (198) were included. Urinary and serum I-FABP and intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) were measured every six hours during 72 h. RESULTS: Fifteen (8%) patients developed ACS and 74 (37%) developed new organ failure. I-FABP and IAP were positively correlated. Patients who developed ACS had higher median baseline levels of urinary I-FABP (235(P25-P75 85-1747)µg/g creat) than patients with IAH who did not develop ACS (87(P25-P75 33-246)µg/g, p = 0.037). With an odds ratio of 1.00, neither urinary nor serum I-FABP indicated increased risk for developing new organ failure or ACS. CONCLUSIONS: A relevant diagnostic value of I-FABP levels for identifying individual patients at risk for intra-abdominal pressure related complications could not be demonstrated.

Hipertensão intra-abdominal e síndrome compartimental abdominal: repercussões e tratamento clínico no paciente crítico / Intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome: repercussions and clinical treatment in critically ill patients

A hipertensão intra-abdominal e a síndrome compartimental abdominal foram durante muitas décadas mal compreendidas e dissociadas de suas repercussões clínicas. Trata-se de um distúrbio que pode levar à disfunção de múltiplos órgãos devido ao desequilíbrio circulatório desencadeado pelo aumento de pressão no compartimento abdominal. As manifestações envolvem os sistemas cardiovascular, respiratório, renal, nervoso e gastrintestinal e estão largamente relacionadas com o fator de morbimortalidade no paciente crítico. A despeito da importância clínica, a hipertensão intra-abdominal e à síndrome compartimental abdominal ainda são temas pouco dominados pelos médicos, e fazem-se necessários o reconhecimento precoce e o estabelecimento de estratégias clínicas objetivas no contexto de uma síndrome com desfecho tão desfavorável. Portanto, foi realizada uma revisão da literatura não sistematizada com objetivo de compreender os principais pontos sobre definições, prevalência, fatores de risco, fisiopatologia, diagnóstico e tratamento acerca da hipertensão intra-abdominal e a síndrome compartimental abdominal.

Intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome have been, for many decades, poorly understood and dissociated from their clinical repercussions. It is a disorder that can lead to organ dysfunction due to circulatory impairment triggered by increased pressure in the abdominal compartment. The manifestations involve cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, nervous, and gastrointestinal systems, and are widely associated with significant morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Despite their clinical importance, intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome are still not sufficiently known by physicians and, early recognition and the establishment of objective clinical strategies for managing these highly morbid syndromes are required. Therefore, a non-systematized review was carried out to understand the main points about definitions, prevalence, risk factors, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome.

Caracterización del síndrome compartimental abdominal en pacientes críticos / Characterization of abdominal compartment syndrome in critical patients

RESUMEN Introducción: el síndrome compartimental abdominal es una entidad clínica sistémica desencadenada por incremento en la presión intraabdominal, caracterizada clínicamente por distensión abdominal y alteraciones de las funciones respiratoria, cardiovascular, neurológica y renal. Objetivo: caracterizar el comportamiento del síndrome compartimental abdominal en los pacientes críticos que ingresaron en la unidad de cuidados intensivos del Hospital Provincial "José Ramón López Tabrane". Materiales y método: se realizó un estudio prospectivo, descriptivo, y longitudinal que tuvo como universo los pacientes adultos con factores de riesgo conocidos para síndrome compartimental abdominal, tratados entre enero de 2014 a diciembre de 2015. Se le realizó medición sistemática de la presión intraabdominal transvesical y fueron sometidos a descompresión quirúrgica en caso de hipertensión intraabdominal grados III y IV. Resultados: los valores de presión intraabdominal sostenidamente elevados, son directamente proporcionales al desarrollo del síndrome compartimental abdominal y trae aparejado disfunciones en los diferentes sistemas de órganos; en estos casos apareció complicaciones, las cuales se presentaron combinadas para todos los pacientes, y fueron mayoritarias para el grupo con presión intraabdominal grado IV. La mortalidad se comportó en un número bastante elevado lo cual estuvo relacionado con los niveles de presión intraabdominal, así como la posibilidad de que fueran reintervenidos quirúrgicamente estos pacientes. Conclusiones: se debe protocolizar en todo paciente con sospecha de desarrollar un síndrome compartimental abdominal la medición periódica de la presión intraabdominal (AU).

SUMMARY Introduction: the abdominal compartment syndrome is a systemic clinical entity triggered by an increase of the intra abdominal pressure, clinically characterized by abdominal distension and the alteration of the renal, neurological, cardiovascular and respiratory functions. Objective: to characterize the behavior of the abdominal compartment syndrome in critical patients from the intensive care unit of the provincial hospital "Jose Ramon Lopez Tabrane". Materials and methods: a longitudinal, descriptive and prospective study was carried out in a universe of adult patients with risk factors known as abdominal compartment syndrome, treated in the period of time from January 2014 to December 2015. Their transvesical intraabdominal pressure was systematically measured and they underwent surgical decompression in cases of intraabdominal hypertension grades iii and iv. Results: the values of intraabdominal pressure steadily increased are directly proportional to the development of the abdominal compartment syndrome and entails dysfunctions in the different systems of organs; in these cases complications were found, that were combined for all patients and mainly in the group with intraabdominal pressure grade iv. Mortality was present in a certainly increased group, and was related to the levels of intraabdominal pressure, and also to the possibility these patients undergoing surgical treatments again. Conclusions: it should be standardized the periodical measure of the intraabdominal pressure in any patient suspected of developing an abdominal compartment syndrome (AU).

Abdominal compartment syndrome: Current concepts and management. / Síndrome compartimental abdominal: conceptos actuales y manejo.

Abdominal compartment syndrome occurs when 2 or more anatomic compartments have a sustained intra-abdominal pressure >20mmHg, associated with organ failure. Incidence is 2% and prevalence varies from 0% to 36.4%. A literature search was conducted utilizing different databases. Articles published from 1970 to 2018 were included, in English or Spanish, to provide the concepts, classifications, and comprehensive management in the approach to abdominal compartment syndrome, for its treatment and the prevention of severe complications associated with the entity. Intravesical pressure measurement is the standard diagnostic method. Treatment is based on evacuation of the intraluminal content, identification and treatment of intra-abdominal lesions, improvement of abdominal wall compliance, and optimum administration of fluids and tissue perfusion. Laparotomy is generally followed by temporary abdominal wall closure 5 to 7 days after surgery. Reconstruction is performed 6 to 12 months after the last operation. Abdominal compartment syndrome should be diagnosed and operated on before organic damage from the illness occurs. Kidney injury can frequently progress and is a parameter for considering abdominal decompression. Having a biomarker for early damage would be ideal. Surgical treatment is successful in the majority of cases. A multidisciplinary focus is necessary for the intensive care and reconstructive needs of the patient. Thus, efforts must be made to define and implement strategies for patient quality of life optimization.

Abdominal compartment syndrome and decompressive laparotomy in children: a 9-year single-center experience.

PURPOSE: Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in children results in 100% mortality if left untreated. Decompressive laparotomy (DL) is the only effective treatment if conservative medical therapies have failed. This study aims to determine the incidence of ACS among pediatric patients who underwent an emergency laparotomy (EL), to describe the effect of DL on clinical and laboratory parameters and, to make a better prediction on fatal outcome, to analyze variables and their association with mortality. METHODS: This retrospective study includes 418 children up to the age of 16 years who underwent EL between January 2010 and December 2018 at our tertiary pediatric referral center. ACS was defined according to the latest guidelines of the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. RESULTS: Fourteen patients had emergency DL for ACS. 6 h preoperatively; median intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and abdominal perfusion pressure (APP) were 22.5 mmHg and 29 mmHg, respectively. After DL, IAP decreased and APP increased, both by an average of 60%. Six patients survived, eight patients had a fatal outcome, resulting in a mortality of 57%. An age under 1 year, weight under the 3rd percentile, an open abdomen treatment, an intestinal resection and an elevated serum lactate > 1.8 mmol/L were associated with an increased relative risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: Improving the outcome in pediatric patients with ACS by removing or attenuating risk factors is difficult. This emphasizes the need for early diagnosis and prompt DL once the diagnosis of ACS is made.

Intra-abdominal hypertension in obese patients undergoing coronary surgery: A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass grafting surgery has an increased risk of adverse events in obese patients. This increased risk might be explained in part by an increased intra-abdominal pressure and the development of intra-abdominal hypertension. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the correlation between obesity and intra-abdominal hypertension and to evaluate its possible impact after coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: A total of 50 consecutive patients scheduled to undergo coronary artery bypass grafting at a single center were selected prospectively before undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting. Based on the body mass index, 25 obese (body mass index ≥ 30) patients were matched with 25 control patients. Each patient had intra-abdominal pressure taken at baseline followed by one measurment every 4 hours until 24 hours after coronary artery bypass grafting. The serum markers for liver and kidney functions were collected once a day for 7 days after coronary artery bypass grafting. RESULTS: Obese patients had a greater (mean ± SD) peak intra-abdominal pressure (15.4 ± 1.6 mm Hg versus 10.6 ± 1.6 mm Hg; P = .011) and mean change of intra-abdominal pressure from baseline (5.1 ± 3.3 mm Hg versus 2.2 ± 2.4 mm Hg; P = .001). The mean abdominal perfusion pressure was less in the obese group (63.0 ± 8.0 mm Hg versus 70.1 ± 11 mm Hg; P = .017). The liver dysfunction, as determined by the Schindl liver function scoring system between the obese and control groups, was not statistically significant (28% vs 8%; P = .066). More patients in the obese group developed renal injury based on the calculated glomerular filtration rate (32% vs 8%; P = .034). Obesity was highly associated with developing intra-abdominal hypertension (odds ratio: 2.99; 95% confidence interval: 1.92-3.53; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Obesity is associated with the development of intra-abdominal hypertension after coronary artery bypass grafting. This effect might indirectly impair the renal and liver functions through a decrease in the abdominal perfusion pressure.

Intra-Abdominal Hypertension Is More Common Than Previously Thought: A Prospective Study in a Mixed Medical-Surgical ICU.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of intra-abdominal hypertension in mixed medical-surgical critically ill patients using modern definitions and measurement techniques. Secondarily to determine variables associated with intra-abdominal hypertension and ICU mortality. DESIGN: A prospective observational study. SETTING: Single institution trauma, medical and surgical ICU in Canada. PATIENTS: Consecutive adult patients admitted to the ICU (n = 285). INTERVENTION: Intra-abdominal pressure measurements twice a day during admission to the ICU. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In 285 patients who met inclusion criteria, 30% were diagnosed with intra-abdominal hypertension at admission and a further 15% developed intra-abdominal hypertension during admission. The prevalence of abdominal compartment syndrome was 3%. Obesity, sepsis, mechanical ventilation, and 24-hour fluid balance (> 3 L) were all independent predictors for intra-abdominal hypertension. Intra-abdominal hypertension occurred in 28% of nonventilated patients. Admission type (medical vs surgical vs trauma) was not a significant predictor of intra-abdominal hypertension. Overall ICU mortality was 20% and was significantly higher for patients with intra-abdominal hypertension (30%) compared with patients without intra-abdominal hypertension (11%). Intra-abdominal hypertension of any grade was an independent predictor of mortality (odds ratio, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.46-7.57). CONCLUSIONS: Intra-abdominal hypertension is common in both surgical and nonsurgical patients in the intensive care setting and was found to be independently associated with mortality. Despite prior reports to the contrary, intra-abdominal hypertension develops in nonventilated patients and in patients who do not have intra-abdominal hypertension at admission. Intra-abdominal pressure monitoring is inexpensive, provides valuable clinical information, and there may be a role for its routine measurement in the ICU. Future work should evaluate the impact of early interventions for patients with intra-abdominal hypertension.

Injúria renal aguda e hipertensão intra-abdominal em paciente queimado em terapia intensiva / Acute kidney injury and intra-abdominal hypertension in burn patients in intensive care

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar a frequência de hipertensão intra-abdominal no paciente grande queimado e sua associação com a ocorrência de injúria renal aguda. Métodos: Estudo de coorte prospectivo, com população de pacientes queimados internados nos leitos de unidade de terapia intensiva especializada. Realizada amostragem de conveniência de pacientes adultos internados no período de 1º de agosto de 2015 a 31 de outubro de 2016. Foram coletados dados clínicos e da queimadura, além de medidas seriadas da pressão intra-abdominal. O nível de significância utilizado foi de 5%. Resultados: Foram analisados 46 pacientes. Evoluíram com hipertensão intra-abdominal 38 pacientes (82,6%). A mediana da maior pressão intra-abdominal foi 15,0mmHg (intervalo interquartílico: 12,0 - 19,0). Desenvolveram injúria renal aguda 32 (69,9%) pacientes. A mediana do tempo para desenvolvimento de injúria renal aguda foi de 3 dias (intervalo interquartílico: 1 - 7). A análise individual de fatores de risco para injúria renal aguda apontou associação com hipertensão intra-abdominal (p = 0,041), uso de glicopeptídeos (p = 0,001), uso de vasopressor (p = 0,001) e uso de ventilação mecânica (p = 0,006). Foi evidenciada associação de injúria renal aguda com maior mortalidade em 30 dias (log-rank, p = 0,009). Conclusão: Ocorreu hipertensão intra-abdominal em grande parte dos pacientes estudados, predominantemente nos graus I e II. Os fatores de risco identificados para ocorrência de injúria renal aguda foram hipertensão intra-abdominal, uso de glicopeptídeos, vasopressor e ventilação mecânica. Injúria renal aguda esteve associada à maior mortalidade em 30 dias.

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the frequency of intra-abdominal hypertension in major burn patients and its association with the occurrence of acute kidney injury. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of a population of burn patients hospitalized in a specialized intensive care unit. A convenience sample was taken of adult patients hospitalized in the period from 1 August 2015 to 31 October 2016. Clinical and burn data were collected, and serial intra-abdominal pressure measurements taken. The significance level used was 5%. Results: A total of 46 patients were analyzed. Of these, 38 patients developed intra-abdominal hypertension (82.6%). The median increase in intra-abdominal pressure was 15.0mmHg (interquartile range: 12.0 to 19.0). Thirty-two patients (69.9%) developed acute kidney injury. The median time to development of acute kidney injury was 3 days (interquartile range: 1 - 7). The individual analysis of risk factors for acute kidney injury indicated an association with intra-abdominal hypertension (p = 0.041), use of glycopeptides (p = 0.001), use of vasopressors (p = 0.001) and use of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.006). Acute kidney injury was demonstrated to have an association with increased 30-day mortality (log-rank, p = 0.009). Conclusion: Intra-abdominal hypertension occurred in most patients, predominantly in grades I and II. The identified risk factors for the occurrence of acute kidney injury were intra-abdominal hypertension and use of glycopeptides, vasopressors and mechanical ventilation. Acute kidney injury was associated with increased 30-day mortality.

Postoperative Development of Abdominal Compartment Syndrome among Patients Undergoing Endovascular Aortic Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) has a reported incidence of 9%-14% among trauma patients. However, in patients with similar hemodynamic changes, the incidence of ACS remains unclear. Our aim was to determine the incidence of ACS among patients undergoing endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs) and to identify associated risk factors. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for consecutive patients who underwent EVAR for rAAA from March 2010 to November 2016 at our institution. The development of ACS was diagnosed based on a variety of factors, including bladder pressure, laboratory abnormalities, hemodynamic monitoring, and clinical evaluation. Previously validated risk factors for ACS development in trauma and EVAR patients (preoperative hypotension, aggressive fluid resuscitation, postoperative anemia, use of an aorto-uniiliac graft, and placement of an aortic occlusive balloon) were analyzed. Association between patient characteristics and ACS development was analyzed using the Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: During the study period, 25 patients had image-confirmed rAAA and underwent emergent EVAR. Mortality rate was 28% (n = 7), and ACS incidence was 12% (n = 3). Of the analyzed risk factors, hypotension on arrival (P = 0.037), transfusion of 3 or more units of packed red blood cells (P = 0.037), and postoperative anemia (P = 0.02) were all significantly associated with postoperative ACS development. In addition, having greater than 3 of the studied risk factors was associated with increased odds of developing ACS (P = 0.015), and having greater than 4 of the studied risk factors showed the strongest association with ACS development (P = 0.0017). CONCLUSIONS: Overresuscitation should be avoided in patients with rAAA. In addition, patients who present with multiple risk factors for ACS should be monitored very closely with serial bladder pressures and may require decompression laparotomy immediately after EVAR.

The Effect of Deep Versus Moderate Neuromuscular Block on Surgical Conditions and Postoperative Respiratory Function in Bariatric Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized, Double Blind Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: In recent literature, it has been suggested that deep neuromuscular block (NMB) improves surgical conditions during laparoscopy; however, the evidence supporting this statement is limited, and this was not investigated in laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Moreover, residual NMB could impair postoperative respiratory function. We tested the hypotheses that deep NMB could improve the quality of surgical conditions for laparoscopic bariatric surgery compared with moderate NMB and investigated whether deep NMB puts patients at risk for postoperative respiratory impairment compared with moderate NMB. METHODS: Sixty patients were evenly randomized over a deep NMB group (rocuronium bolus and infusion maintaining a posttetanic count of 1-2) and a moderate NMB group (rocuronium bolus and top-ups maintaining a train-of-four count of 1-2). Anesthesia was induced and maintained with propofol and remifentanil. The primary outcome measures were the quality of surgical conditions assessed by a single surgeon using a 5-point rating scale (1 = extremely poor, 5 = optimal), the number of intra-abdominal pressure increases >18 cmH2O and the duration of surgery. Secondary outcome measure was the postoperative pulmonary function assessed by peak expiratory flow, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and forced vital capacity, and by the need for postoperative respiratory support. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation with estimated treatment effect (ETE: mean difference [95% confidence interval]) for group comparisons. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the surgeon's rating regarding the quality of the surgical field between the deep and moderate NMB group (4.2 ± 1.0 vs 3.9 ± 1.1; P = .16, respectively; ETE: 0.4 [-0.1, 0.9]). There was no difference in the proportional rating of surgical conditions over the 5-point rating scale between both groups (P = .91). The number of intra-abdominal pressure increases >18 cmH2O and the duration of surgery were not statistically different between the deep and moderate NMB group (0.2 ± 0.9 vs 0.3 ± 1.0; P = .69; ETE: -0.1 [-0.5, 0.4] and 61.3 ± 15.1 minutes vs 70.6 ± 20.8 minutes; P = .07, ETE: -9.3 [-18.8, 0.1], respectively). All the pulmonary function tests were considerably impaired in both groups when compared with baseline (P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in the decrease in peak expiratory flow, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and forced vital capacity (expressed as % change from baseline) between the deep and the moderate NMB group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a moderate NMB, there was insufficient evidence to conclude that deep NMB improves surgical conditions during laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Postoperative pulmonary function was substantially decreased after laparoscopic bariatric surgery independently of the NMB regime that was used. The study is limited by a small sample size.

Intra-abdominal Hypertension and Postoperative Kidney Dysfunction in Cardiac Surgery Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) in adult cardiac surgery patients and its association with postoperative kidney dysfunction. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Single tertiary-care university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-two adult patients having cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. INTERVENTIONS: Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) was measured preoperatively, immediately after surgery, and at the following time points after surgery: 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours. Urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) levels were measured as a marker of kidney dysfunction at the following time points: prior to surgery, immediately after surgery, 4 to 6 hours after surgery, and 16-to-18 hours after surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-two IAPs were measured, and 90 (35.7%) showed IAH. Thirty-five of 42 patients (83.3%) had IAH at 1 time point or more. Peak urine NGAL levels were lower in patients with normal IAP (mean difference = -130.6 ng/mL [95% CI = -211.2 to -50.1], p = 0.002). There was no difference in postoperative kidney dysfunction by risk, injury, failure, loss of kidney function, and end-stage kidney disease (RIFLE) criteria in patients with normal IAP (mean difference = -31.4% [95% CI = -48.0 to 6.3], p = 0.09). IAH was 100% sensitive for predicting postoperative kidney dysfunction by RIFLE criteria, but had poor specificity (54.8%). CONCLUSIONS: IAH occurs frequently during the perioperative period in cardiac surgery patients and may be associated with postoperative kidney dysfunction.

Prevalence and mortality of abdominal compartment syndrome in severely injured patients: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in severely injured patients is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Many efforts have been made to improve outcome of patients with ACS. A treatment algorithm for ACS patients was introduced on January 1, 2005 by the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and mortality rate of ACS among severely injured patients before and after January 1, 2005 using a systematic literature review. METHOD: Databases of Embase, Medline (OvidSP), Web of Science, CINAHL, CENTRAL, PubMed publisher, and Google Scholar were searched for terms related to severely injured patients and ACS. Original studies reporting ACS in trauma patients were considered eligible. Data on study design, population, definitions, prevalence, and mortality rates were extracted. Pooled prevalence and mortality of ACS among severely injured patients were calculated for both time periods using inversed variance weighting assuming a random effects model. Tests for heterogeneity were applied. RESULTS: A total of 80 publications were included. Prevalence of studies that finished enrolling patients before January 1, 2005 ranged from 0.5% to 36.4% and 0.0% to 28.0% in studies after that date. For severely injured patients admitted to the ICU, this range was 0.5% to 1.3% before 2005 and 0% in one publication in the second time period. For patients with visceral injuries, ACS prevalence ranged 1.0% to 20.0%; one study in the second time period reported 11.1%. The prevalence among severely injured patients who underwent trauma laparotomy ranged from 0.9% to 36.4% in the first time period. Two studies after January 1, 2005 reported ACS prevalence of 2.3% and 13.2%, respectively. The mortality rate in both time periods ranged between 0.0% and 100.0%. CONCLUSION: The overall prevalence of ACS ranged from 0.0% to 36.4%. Future studies are needed to measure the effect of improved trauma care and effectiveness of the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome Consensus Statements. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review/meta-analysis, level III.