Editorial Commentary: Small Labral Size on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is an Indication for Labral Reconstruction in the Setting of Revision Hip Arthroscopy.

Revision hip arthroscopy is an increasingly common procedure as rates of primary hip arthroscopy rise. Etiologies for symptom recurrence may include residual femoroacetabular impingement, cam over-resection, labral pathology, chondral wear, adhesions, and instability. This has spawned sophisticated surgical techniques in hip arthroscopy including labral reconstruction. Indications for labral reconstruction in the revision setting obviously include labral deficiency. In addition, in the absence of other obvious reasons for failure of the primary procedure, a labral reconstruction should be considered for diminutive labra. The ability to predict labral size before surgery based on magnetic resonance imaging can be invaluable.

Microfracture of Acetabular Chondral Lesions Is Not Superior to Other Cartilage Repair Techniques in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review to compare clinical outcomes of hip arthroscopy patients undergoing microfracture (MFx) versus other cartilage repair procedures for chondral lesions of the acetabulum. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify comparative studies that directly compared outcomes between MFx and other cartilage repair procedures for full-thickness chondral lesions of the acetabulum identified during hip arthroscopy. The search phrase used was: hip AND arthroscopy AND microfracture. Patients were evaluated based on reoperation rates and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: Six studies (all Level III evidence) met inclusion criteria, including a total of 202 patients undergoing microfracture (group A) and 327 patients undergoing another cartilage repair procedure (group B). Mean patient age ranged from 35.0 to 45.0 years. Mean follow-up time ranged from 12.0 to 72.0 months. Significantly better patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were found in patients undergoing treatment with bone marrow aspirate concentrate, microfragmented adipose tissue concentrate, autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis, and a combination of autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis and bone marrow aspirate concentrate compared with MFx. No studies found significantly better postoperative PROs in group A. The reoperation rate ranged from 0% to 34.6% in group A and 0% to 15.9% in group B. Three of 5 studies reporting on reoperation rate found a significantly greater reoperation rate in group A, with no difference in the other 2 studies. CONCLUSIONS: The literature on MFx of acetabular chondral lesions is limited and heterogeneous. Based on the available data, MFx alone results in a greater or equivalent reoperation rate and inferior or equivalent PROs compared with other cartilage repair procedures for acetabular chondral lesions in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, systematic review of level III studies.

Does the dGEMRIC Index Recover 3 Years After Surgical FAI Correction and an Initial dGEMRIC Decrease at 1-Year Follow-up? A Controlled Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) allows objective and noninvasive assessment of cartilage quality. An interim analysis 1 year after correction of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) previously showed that the dGEMRIC index decreased despite good clinical outcome. PURPOSE: To evaluate dGEMRIC indices longitudinally in patients who underwent FAI correction and in a control group undergoing nonoperative treatment for FAI. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: This prospective, comparative longitudinal study included 39 patients (40 hips) who received either operative (n = 20 hips) or nonoperative (n = 20 hips) treatment. Baseline demographic characteristics and presence of osseous deformities did not differ between groups. All patients received indirect magnetic resonance arthrography at 3 time points (baseline, 1 and 3 years of follow-up). The 3-dimensional cartilage models were created using a custom-developed deep learning-based software. The dGEMRIC indices were determined separately for acetabular and femoral cartilage. A mixed-effects model was used for statistical analysis in repeated measures. RESULTS: The operative group showed an initial (preoperative to 1-year follow-up) decrease of dGEMRIC indices: acetabular from 512 ± 174 to 392 ± 123 ms and femoral from 530 ± 173 to 411 ± 117 ms (both P < .001). From 1-year to 3-year follow-up, dGEMRIC indices improved again: acetabular from 392 ± 123 to 456 ± 163 ms and femoral from 411 ± 117 to 477 ± 169 ms (both P < .001). The nonoperative group showed no significant changes in dGEMRIC indices in acetabular and femoral cartilage from baseline to either follow-up point (all P > .05). CONCLUSION: This study showed that 3 years after FAI correction, the dGEMRIC indices improved compared with short-term 1-year follow-up. This may be due to normalized joint biomechanics or regressive postoperative activation of the inflammatory cascade after intra-articular surgery.

Editorial Commentary: In Patients With Hip-Spine Syndrome, a Single Simple Solution May Not Apply: Occam's Razor Becomes Blunt.

The importance of hip-spine syndrome in a nonarthritic population, in which patients present with coexisting symptoms in both the hip and lumbar spine, is becoming more clear. Several studies have shown inferior outcomes in patients undergoing treatment for femoral acetabular impingement syndrome with coexisting spinal symptoms. The most important factor when treating HSS patients is understanding each patient's pathology. A history and physical examination with provocative tests for spinal and hip pathology often provide the answer. Routine standing and seated lateral radiographs are required to assess spinopelvic mobility. If the cause of pain is unclear, diagnostic intra-articular hip injections with local anesthetic and further imaging of the lumbar spine are recommended. In patients with degenerative spine disease with neural impingement, these symptoms may persist after hip arthroscopy, particularly if not improved by intra-articular injections. Patients should be appropriately counseled. If hip symptoms predominate, treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome results in improved outcomes, even with coexisting neural impingement. If spine symptoms predominate, referral to an appropriate specialist may be required. In patients with HSS, Occam's razor becomes blunt; thus, a single simple solution may not apply, and we may need to consider treating each pathology separately.

Combined femoral and acetabular version and synovitis are associated with dGEMRIC scores in people with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome.

This study sought to explore, in people with symptoms, signs and imaging findings of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI syndrome): (1) whether more severe labral damage, synovitis, bone marrow lesions, or subchondral cysts assessed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were associated with poorer cartilage health, and (2) whether abnormal femoral, acetabular, and/or combined femoral and acetabular versions were associated with poorer cartilage health. This cross-sectional study used baseline data from the 50 participants with FAI syndrome in the Australian FASHIoN trial (ACTRN12615001177549) with available dGEMRIC scans. Cartilage health was measured using delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) score sampled at the chondrolabral junction on three midsagittal slices, at one acetabular and one femoral head region of interest on each slice, and MRI features were assessed using the Hip Osteoarthritis MRI Score. Analyses were adjusted for alpha angle and body mass index, which are known to affect dGEMRIC score. Linear regression assessed the relationship with the dGEMRIC score of (i) selected MRI features, and (ii) femoral, acetabular, and combined femoral and acetabular versions. Hips with more severe synovitis had worse dGEMRIC scores (partial η2 = 0.167, p = 0.020), whereas other MRI features were not associated. A lower combined femoral and acetabular version was associated with a better dGEMRIC score (partial η2 = 0.164, p = 0.021), whereas isolated measures of femoral and acetabular version were not associated. In conclusion, worse synovitis was associated with poorer cartilage health, suggesting synovium and cartilage may be linked to the pathogenesis of FAI syndrome. A lower combined femoral and acetabular version appears to be protective of cartilage health at the chondrolabral junction.

Hip Labral Morphological Changes in Patients with Femoroacetabular Impingement Speed Up the Onset of Early Osteoarthritis.

Over the last decade, evidence has mounted for a prominent etiologic role of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) in the development of early hip osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of this study was to compare the ultrastructure and tissue composition of the hip labrum in healthy and pathological conditions, as FAI and OA, to provide understanding of structural changes which might be helpful in the future to design targeted therapies and improve treatment indications. We analyzed labral tissue samples from five healthy multi-organ donors (MCDs) (median age, 38 years), five FAI patients (median age, 37 years) and five late-stage OA patients undergoing total hip replacement (median age, 56 years). We evaluated morpho-functional by histology and transmission electron microscopy. Extracellular matrix (ECM) structure changes were similar in specimens from FAI compared to those from patients with OA (more severe in the latter) showing disorganization of collagen fibers and increased proteoglycan content. In FAI and in OA nuclei the chromatin was condensed, organelle degenerated and cytoplasm vacuolized. Areas of calcification were mainly observed in FAI and OA labrum, as well as apoptotic-like features. We showed that labral tissue of patients with FAI had similar pathological alterations of tissue obtained from OA patients, suggesting that FAI patients might have high susceptibility to develop OA.

Editorial Commentary: Treatment of Concomitant Intra-Articular Pathology in Patients With Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome Is Indicated by Provocative Impingement or Instability Physical Examination and Ultrasound-Guided Analgesic Injection Testing.

Endoscopic surgery can be used to address peritrochanteric pathology in patients with greater trochanteric pain syndrome. During management of these patients, surgeons must decide whether adjunctive hip arthroscopy to treat concomitant intra-articular pathology (such as labral tears or chondral lesions) is required, because the prevalence of intra-articular findings may be greater than the clinical significance. A thorough history and physical examination can help distinguish whether the symptoms are arising from a peritrochanteric issue (e.g., gluteal tendinopathy, trochanteric bursitis, external coxa saltans) versus an intra-articular pain generator. Increased symptoms with provocative impingement or instability testing indicate adjunctive hip arthroscopy to address intra-articular abnormalities. In addition, an ultrasound-guided analgesic injection into the hip joint or peritrochanteric region may aid in diagnosis. A patient with partial symptomatic relief from separate injections into both areas is a classic presentation and consistent with a mixed-picture of peritrochanteric and intra-articular pathology, which may be addressed with a combined endoscopic and arthroscopic approach.

Two Novel Clinical Tests for the Diagnosis of Hip Labral Tears.

BACKGROUND: There are few well-studied clinical tests for the diagnosis of hip labral tears. As the differential diagnosis for hip pain is broad, accurate clinical examination is important in guiding advanced imaging and identifying patients who may benefit from surgical management. PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of 2 novel clinical tests for the diagnosis of hip labral tears. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Clinical examination findings including the Arlington, twist, and flexion-adduction-internal rotation (FADIR)/impingement tests as performed by a fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeon specializing in hip arthroscopy were obtained from retrospective chart review. The Arlington test ranges the hip from flexion-abduction-external rotation to FADIR while applying subtle internal rotation and external rotation motion. The twist test involves internal rotation and external rotation of the hip while weightbearing. Diagnostic accuracy statistics for each of the tests were calculated using magnetic resonance arthrography as the reference standard. RESULTS: A total of 283 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 40.7 years (range, 13-77 years) and 66.4% were women. The Arlington test was found to have a sensitivity of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90-0.96), specificity of 0.33 (95% CI, 0.16-0.56), positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.97), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.26 (95% CI, 0.13-0.46). The twist test was found to have a sensitivity of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.62-0.73), specificity of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.49-0.88), PPV of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94-0.99), and NPV of 0.13 (95% CI, 0.08-0.21). The FADIR/impingement test was found to have a sensitivity of 0.43 (95% CI, 0.37-0.49), specificity of 0.56 (95% CI, 0.34-0.75), PPV of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.87-0.97), and NPV of 0.06 (95% CI, 0.03-0.11). The Arlington test was significantly more sensitive than both the twist and FADIR/impingement tests (P < .05), while the twist test was significantly more specific than the Arlington test (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The Arlington test is more sensitive than the traditional FADIR/impingement test, while the twist test is more specific than the FADIR/impingement test in diagnosing hip labral tears in the hands of an experienced orthopaedic surgeon.

Editorial Commentary: Excessive Femoral Retroversion and Increased Femoral Anteversion Has a Negative Effect on Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes: Symptomatic Extremes of Version Require an Osteotomy.

With the rise in the prevalence of hip arthroscopy, patient selection and proper surgical execution are key to achieving excellent outcomes. As our understanding of femoral acetabular impingement grows, so does our surgical indications to achieve excellent surgical outcomes. Some impingement pathologies are amenable to arthroscopy alone and those with excessive version, dysplasia, Perthese, protrusio, and coxa-vara, or valga require an isolated or combined osteotomy. The version of the femur is known to be a significant source of impingement, and its impact on arthroscopic surgical outcomes has long been assumed to be inconsequential. Those that perform open and arthroscopic hip surgery understand this to be untrue, and arthroscopy alone cannot solve all of our impingement problems.

Amorphous calcium deposits of the hip joint: current observations and state of the scientific discussion.

INTRODUCTION: As a result of increasing hip arthroscopies, rare pathologies as intra-articular amorphous calcium deposits in the capsule-labral (perilabral) recess can be recognized. There is a lack of publications on this pathology. The largest case series included 18 patients. An association between femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and female sex was observed. Furthermore, a correlation between the size of the calcific deposit and the preoperative hip function score was reported. Our hypothesis was that the data of our patient collective with intraoperative amorphous calcium deposits of the hip joint are comparable to the existing data to confirm previous observations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 01/2018 to 08/2020, a total of 714 hip arthroscopies were performed. 12 (1.7%) patients who presented intra-articular amorphous calcium deposits during arthroscopy were included. On radiographs, signs of impingement and osteoarthritis were determined. Characteristics and size of the calcific deposits were examined. Preoperative and at the time of follow-up (23 months), patient-reported outcome scores (PROS) were evaluated. Duration of symptoms, pain medication, comorbidities, and return-to-work were evaluated too. RESULTS: The PROS of the four female and eight male patients improved significantly. The average size of the calcific deposit was 6.9 mm in the anteroposterior radiographs. Separation of the calcific deposit from the acetabular rim was seen in nine cases. No correlation between deposit sizes and PROS was found. Cam morphology was treated in ten cases. All patients returned to work after a median of 7 weeks (2.5-13 weeks). CONCLUSION: Amorphous calcium deposits were found in approximately 1% of all hip joints with indication for hip arthroscopy. They are not consistently associated with gender, intra-articular hip pathologies or comorbidities. The clustered occurrence in cam FAI can be justified solely by the fact that impingement is by far the most common indication for hip arthroscopy.

Automated measurement of alpha angle on 3D-magnetic resonance imaging in femoroacetabular impingement hips: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome is an established pre-osteoarthritic condition. Diagnosis is based on both clinical and radiographic parameters. An abnormal manually calculated alpha angle in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is traditionally utilized to diagnose abnormal femoral head-neck offset. This pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility of automated alpha angle measurements in patients with FAI syndrome, and to compare automated with manual measurements data with regard to the time and effort needed in each method. METHODS: Alpha angles were measured with manual and automated techniques, using postprocessing software in nineteen hip MRIs of FAI syndrome patients. Two observers conducted manual measurements. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility and correlation of manual and automated alpha angle measurements were calculated using intra-class correlation (ICC) analysis. Both techniques were compared regarding the time taken (in minutes) and effort required, measured as the amount of mouse button presses performed. RESULTS: The first observer's intra-observer reproducibility was good (ICC 0.77; p < 0.001) while the second observer's was good-to-excellent (ICC 0.93; p < 0.001). Inter-observer reproducibility between both observers in the first (ICC 0.45; p < 0.001) and second (ICC 0.56; p < 0.001) manual alpha angle assessment was moderate. The intra-class correlation coefficients between manual and automated alpha angle measurements were ICC = 0.24 (p = 0.052; observer 1, 1st measurement), ICC = 0.32 (p = 0.015; observer 1, 2nd measurement), ICC = 0.50 (p < 0.001; observer 2, 1st measurement), and ICC = 0.45 (p < 0.001; observer 2, 2nd measurement). Average runtime for automatic processing of the image data for the automated assessment was 16.6 ± 1.9 min. Automatic alpha angle measurements took longer (time difference: 14.6 ± 3.9 min; p < 0.001) but required less effort (difference in button presses: 231 ± 23; p < 0.001). While the automatic processing is running, the user can perform other tasks. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrates that objective and reliable automated alpha angle measurement of MRIs in FAI syndrome hips is feasible. Trial registration The Ethics Committee of the University of Düsseldorf approved our study (Registry-ID: 2017084398).

Editorial Commentary: The Measurement of the Alpha Angle in Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome With a 45° Dunn-View Radiograph Predicts the Cartilage Damage on the Acetabular Side of the Hip Joint-Is It as Simple as That?

In recent years, femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) has developed itself into a well-known pathology throughout the orthopaedic community worldwide. The more we learned, the more sophisticated it became: In the beginning, we measured the femoral head-neck offset; then, the alpha angle was found to be a useful measurement in detecting FAIS. We learned to perform these measurements with, for example, the 45° Dunn view. The alpha angle, but not the femoral head-neck offset, measured as described, predicts not only the acetabular cartilage damage resulting from FAIS but also the correlation between the degree of the alpha angle and the severity of the cartilage damage within the acetabular labrum articular disruption and Outerbridge classifications. The femoral head-neck offset cannot provide us with this information, but it is the first sign we all look at before taking any measurements on radiographs or magnetic resonance imaging scans if a cam morphology could be present. It is paramount to understand the underlying problems of the individual hip and distinguish instability (dysplasia) from FAIS and also to evaluate femoral torsional abnormalities to perform the appropriate treatment using magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scans if necessary. The alpha angle quantifies the severity of the pathology and predicts the possible cartilage damage in FAIS patients, but in our opinion, we cannot neglect the femoral head-neck offset, because it is often the first radiologic sign of FAIS that most of us realize on a radiograph. Therefore, both signs have their place in detecting and treating FAIS.

Editorial Commentary: Low-Radiation Dose 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Scan Reconstruction Is the Best Way to Visualize the Anterior Inferior Iliac Spine-For Now.

Femoroacetabular impingement comes in several anatomic variations that may coexist, and subspine impingement is a commonly discussed cause of indirect extra-articular hip pathology. Although a classification system to identify and understand anterior inferior iliac spine morphology has been in place for some time, attempts have been made to visualize and understand the anatomy based on other imaging modalities. Standard radiographs are a common part of the initial patient evaluation pathway, along with thorough history taking and physical examination findings. Magnetic resonance imaging scans are obtained typically to evaluate the soft tissue, muscle, ligaments, articular cartilage, and labrum for pathology. For many hip preservation surgeons, a computed tomography scan with 3-dimensional reconstruction is standard protocol for patients who progress along the treatment pathway toward a surgical procedure because understanding the complex hip anatomy is key to successful surgical treatment. Many hip arthroscopy patients are in their young adult years, and we always attempt to reduce the amount of radiation exposure. Eliminating this computed tomography scan and using standard-of-care magnetic resonance imaging to simplify patient care, reduce radiation, and reduce health care costs would certainly be beneficial to our hip preservation patients.

Three-Dimensional Morphometric Characterization of Femoral Cam Lesions: Quantifying the Radial and Lateral Extents.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the radial and lateral extents of femoral cam lesions in FAI patients relative to the alpha angle and correlate with clinical data. METHODS: Retrospective study of 81 hips with femoral cam morphology that underwent arthroscopic surgery between 2017 and 2019. At each hour over the clockface, the alpha angle (α) (abnormal defined as > 55°), radial extent, and lateral extent of cam lesions were measured on CT. These measurements were correlated with clinical and arthroscopic data. Statistics included independent samples t-test and chi-squared test with Bonferroni correction and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Larger α at 12:00-4:00 in males vs females (56.6-63.4° vs 44.3-58.5°, P < 0.001) and at 2:00-4:00 with elite sports participation vs without (56.7-70.9° vs 49.6-61.1°, P ≤ 0.004). Independent risk factors for radial extent beyond 12:00-3:00 were: male sex (OR 4.82, 95% CI [1.46, 15.85], P = 0.010), BMI > 25 (OR 4.74, 95% CI [1.61, 14.00], P = 0.005), and elite sports participation (OR 3.28, 95% CI [1.09, 9.82], P = 0.034). Lateral extent increased at 1:00-4:00 in males vs females (7.8-18.6 mm vs 1.6-9.1 mm, P < 0.0001). A 16% prevalence of distal cam lesions was found at locations with normal α, resulting in underestimation of radial extent by an average of 1.7 hours. CONCLUSION: There is a positive correlation between the alpha angle, lateral extent, and radial extent of cam lesions. FAI patients who were male, participated in elite level sports, and had a BMI > 25 had larger cam lesions. A larger alpha angle is a risk factor for cartilage damage. Patients may have distal cam lesions at locations with normal alpha angles, though their significance is unknown.

Assessment of acetabular chondral damage and labral pathologies via direct MR arthrography: specialization matters.

AIMS: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of investigators from different specialities (radiologists and orthopaedic surgeons) with varying levels of experience of 1.5 T direct magnetic resonance arthrography (dMRA) against intraoperative findings in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). METHODS: A total of 272 patients were evaluated with dMRA and subsequent hip arthroscopy. The dMRA images were evaluated independently by two non-hip-arthroscopy-trained orthopaedic surgeons, two fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists, and two hip-arthroscopy-trained orthopaedic surgeons. The radiological diagnoses were compared with the intraoperative findings. RESULTS: Hip arthroscopy revealed labral pathologies in 218 (79%) and acetabular chondral lesions in 190 (69%) hips. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy for evaluating the acetabular labral pathologies were 79%, 18%, 79%, 18%, and 66% (non-hip-arthroscopy trained orthopaedic surgeons), 83%, 36%, 83%, 36%, and 74% (fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists), and 88%, 53%, 88%, 54% and 81% (hip-arthroscopy trained orthopaedic surgeons). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of dMRA for assessing the acetabular chondral damage were 81%, 36%, 71%, 50%, and 66% (non-hip-arthroscopy trained orthopaedic surgeons), 84%, 38%, 75%, 52%, and 70% (fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists), and 91%, 51%, 81%, 73%, and 79% (hip-arthroscopy trained orthopaedic surgeons). The hip-arthroscopy trained orthopaedic surgeons displayed the highest percentage of correctly diagnosed labral pathologies and acetabular chondral lesions, which is significantly higher than the other two investigator groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The accuracy of dMRA on detecting labral pathologies or acetabular chondral lesions depends on the examiner and its level of experience in hip arthroscopy. The highest values are found for the hip-arthroscopy-trained orthopaedic surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study; III.

The natural history of alpha angle in the last seventeen centuries.

INTRODUCTION: Hip osteoarthritis is one of the most important and debilitating diseases affecting thousands of people all over the world. On the other hand, femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is one of the known important causes of hip osteoarthritis. Cam deformity frequently presents in FAI showing an increased alpha angle. Increased alpha angle has been observed among young patients involved in demanding physical activities such as in sports (40-60%), whereas among the non-athletic population, increased alpha angle was observed in 15-20%. Although femoroacetabular pathology has been described over the recent years, it is not possible to determine when the angle increase actually begins prior to diagnosis. The aim of our study is to evaluate the femoral alpha angle in different human femurs in different civilization eras in West Mediterranean area. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Available ancient femurs were selected from the Collection Center belonging to the archeological archives (ancient necropolis) from the fourth, fourteenth and eighteenth centuries. A comparison of the alpha angle was made of the measurements from the different groups accompanied by a sample of present-day femurs from the radiology database of CT scans. Data from 243 femoral bones were collected, 50 of which from the fourth century, 26 from the fourteenth century, 68 from the eighteenth century, and 99 femurs from the 20/twenty-first century. RESULTS: Alpha angles in all historical samples showed pathological values (> 55º) up to a maximum of 11.5% of the cases. Meanwhile, the actual series showed pathological alpha angle in 60.1% of the cases with statistical significant differences. CONCLUSION: The studied femurs of the western Mediterranean region from the fourth, fourteenth and eighteenth centuries showed pathological alpha angles in a smaller proportion than the actual sample. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective studies.

The New Bern Chondrolabral Classification Is Reliable and Reproducible.

BACKGROUND: Several classification systems have been used to describe early lesions of hip cartilage and the acetabular labrum in young adults with hip pain. Some of them were introduced before the concept of femoroacetabular impingement was proposed. Others were developed for other joints (such as the patellofemoral joint). However, these often demonstrate inadequate reliability, and they do not characterize all possible lesions. Therefore, we developed a novel classification system. QUESTION/PURPOSE: We asked: What is the (1) intraobserver reliability, (2) interobserver reproducibility, and (3) percentage of nonclassifiable lesions of the new classification system for damage to the hip cartilage and labrum compared with six established classification systems for chondral lesions (Beck et al. [4], Konan et al. [10], Outerbridge et al. [14]) and labral lesions (Beck et al. [3], Lage et al. [12], Peters and Erickson [15])? METHODS: We performed a validation study of a new classification system of early chondrolabral degeneration lesions based on intraoperative video documentation taken during surgical hip dislocations for joint-preserving surgery in 57 hips (56 patients) performed by one surgeon with standard video documentation of intraarticular lesions. The exclusion criteria were low-quality videos, inadequate exposure angles, traumatic lesions, and incomplete radiographic documentation. This left 42 hips (41 patients) for the blinded and randomized analysis of six raters, including those with cam-pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) (19 hips in 18 patients), isolated cam-type FAI (10 hips), extraarticular FAI due to femoral anteversion (seven hips), isolated pincer-type FAI (two hips), focal avascular necrosis (two hips), localized pigmented villonodular synovitis (one hip), and acetabular dysplasia as a sequelae of Perthes disease (one hip). The raters had various degrees of experience in hip surgery: Three were board-certified orthopaedic fellows and three were orthopaedic residents, in whom we chose to prove the general usability of the classification systems in less experienced readers. Every rater was given the original publication of all existing classification systems and a visual guide of the new Bern classification system. Every rater classified the lesions according the existing classifications (cartilage: Beck et al. [4], Konan et al. [10], and Outerbridge et al. [14]; labrum: Beck et al. [3], Peters and Erickson [15], and Lage et al. [12]) and our new Bern chondrolabral classification system. The intraclass correlation coefficient with 95% confidence interval was used to assess the intraobserver reliability and interobserver reproducibility. The percentage of nonclassifiable lesions was calculated as an absolute number and percentage. RESULTS: The intraobserver intercorrelation coefficients (ICCs) for cartilage lesions were as follows: the Bern classification system (0.68 [95% CI 0.61 to 0.70]), Beck (0.44 [95% CI 0.34 to 0.54]), Konan (0.39 [95% CI 0.29 to 0.49]), and the Outerbridge classification (0.57 [95% CI 0.48 to 0.65]). For labral lesions, the ICCs were as follows: the Bern classification (0.70 [95% CI 0.63 to 0.76]), Peters (0.42 [95% CI 0.31 to 0.51]), Lage (0.26 [95% CI 0.15 to 0.38]), and Beck (0.59 [95% CI 0.51 to 0.67]). The interobserver ICCs for cartilage were as follows: the Bern classification system (0.63 [95% CI 0.51 to 0.75), the Outerbridge (0.14 [95% CI 0.04 to 0.28]), Konan (0.58 [95% CI 0.40 to 0.76]), and Beck (0.52 [95% CI 0.39 to 0.66]). For labral lesions, the ICCs were as follows: the Bern classification (0.61 [95% CI 0.49 to 0.74]), Beck (0.31 [95% CI 0.19 to 0.46]), Peters (0.28 [95% CI 0.16 to 0.44]), and Lage (0.20 [95% CI 0.09 to 0.35]). The percentage of nonclassifiable cartilage lesions was 0% for the Bern, 0.04% for Beck, 17% for Konan, and 25% for the Outerbridge classification. The percentage of nonclassifiable labral lesions was 0% for Bern and Beck, 4% for Peters, and 25% for Lage. CONCLUSION: We have observed some shortcomings with currently used classification systems for hip pathology, and the new classification system we developed seems to have improved the intraobserver reliability compared with the Beck and Konan classifications in cartilage lesions and with the Peters and Lage classifications in labral lesions. The interrater reproducibility of the Bern classification seems to have improved in cartilage lesions compared with the Outerbridge classification and in labral lesions compared with the Beck, Peters, and Lage classifications. The Bern classification identified all present cartilage and labral lesions. It provides a solid clinical basis for accurate descriptions of early degenerative hip lesions independent of etiology, and it is reproducible enough to use in the reporting of clinical research. Further studies need to replicate our findings in the hands of nondevelopers and should focus on the prognostic value of this classification and its utility in guiding surgical indications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, diagnostic study.

Patients With Symptomatic Sequelae of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Have Advanced Cartilage Wear at the Time of Surgical Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a common hip problem in children. The resulting deformity can cause impingement similar to cam-type idiopathic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Although there are similarities between FAI and SCFE, deformity patterns, severity, and time of onset of symptoms varies, which may impact management. The purpose of this study was to describe patterns of articular cartilage damage in patients undergoing surgical hip dislocation for sequelae of SCFE in comparison to patients undergoing arthroscopic surgery for primary FAI. METHODS: Patients were identified who underwent surgical treatment for hip pain due to primary FAI (cam type) or sequelae of SCFE. Clinical data and radiographic measurements were recorded. Cartilage was assessed intraoperatively. Severity was classified using the modified Beck classification, while location was classified into 6 sectors. Statistical analysis was performed to test for differences in demographic and radiographic characteristics between the SCFE and FAI patients. χ2 or Fisher exact tests were used to evaluate trends in patterns of acetabular and femoral cartilage wear between SCFE and FAI groups. RESULTS: The SCFE group had 28 hips compared with 304 in the FAI group. SCFE patients were younger (19 vs. 32, P<0.001), had higher body mass index (30±5.9 vs. 24±4.8, P<0.001), and were more often male (61% vs. 27%, P<0.001). Deformity severity based on α-angle was higher in the SCFE group [AP 74 vs. 55 (P=0.001) and Dunn 72 vs. 58 (P<0.001)]. There were no significant differences with regards to lateral center edge angle, anterior center edge angle, or Tonnis angle. In both groups the most common locations for cartilage lesions in both groups were the anterior peripheral and superolateral peripheral regions with fewer but more widely distributed femoral head lesions. The SCFE group had higher rates of femoral head and superolateral central cartilage lesions compared with the FAI group. There was no statistical difference between high-grade femoral or acetabular cartilage lesions between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SCFE were younger at the time of surgery and presented with more severe deformity based on radiographic α-angle compared to patients with FAI. Our results suggest higher prevalence of femoral head lesions and more diffuse cartilage injury in patients with SCFE. This study can be used to support early surgical intervention in patients with symptomatic sequelae of SCFE due to risk of premature joint damage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-prognostic study.

Why Does Hip Arthroscopy Fail? Indications and PEARLS for Revision Success.

The surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement has been shown to have successful early and mid-term clinical outcomes. Despite these favorable clinical outcomes that have been published in the literature, there is a subgroup of patients that present with continued or recurrent symptoms after surgical treatment. Not only has there been an increase in the number of hip arthroscopy procedures, but also there has been a corresponding increase in the number of revision hip arthroscopy and hip preservation surgeries. Previous studies have reported residual deformity to be the most common reason for revision hip arthroscopy. However, chondral, labral, and capsular considerations also are important when addressing patients not only in the primary but also, the revision setting. In this review, we outline the evaluation and treatment of the patient that presents with continued hip and groin pain after undergoing a hip.

Acetabular Rim Disorders/Pincer-type Femoroacetabular Impingement and Hip Arthroscopy.

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) can lead to acetabular impaction, chondral injury, and labral pathology secondary to deformities of the proximal femur (CAM-type FAI), acetabulum (pincer-type FAI), or with combined FAI. While the majority of cases are of the combined type, this paper focuses on acetabular overcoverage/pincer-type deformities. Various pincer subtypes include focal anterior overcoverage, global retroversion, global overcoverage/profunda, protrusio, subspine impingement, and os acetabuli/rim fracture variants. A thorough history and physical examination, plain radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, 3-dimensional computerized tomography, and diagnostic injections can lead to an accurate assessment of pincer-type variants. Appropriately indicated arthroscopic management techniques and pearls for the various pincer subtypes can lead to improved patient-related outcome measures and a high rate of return to athletic activity for the majority of these patients.