Clinical course of classic Kaposi's sarcoma in HIV-negative patients treated with the HIV protease inhibitor indinavir.

HIV protease inhibitors have been shown to exert antiangiogenic and antitumor actions independently from their antiretroviral effect. Based on these studies, HIV-seronegative patients with classic Kaposi's sarcoma were treated with indinavir and followed for clinical evolution, drug pharmacokinetics and Kaposi's sarcoma biomarkers. A favorable clinical course was associated with high drug plasma levels, reduced production of basic fibroblast growth factor, lower numbers of circulating endothelial cells, and a decrease in antibody titers against human herpesvirus 8.

Pharmacokinetics of an indinavir-ritonavir-fosamprenavir regimen in patients with human immunodeficiency virus.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetic compatibility of a ritonavir-boosted indinavir-fosamprenavir combination among patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). DESIGN: Single-center, nonrandomized, prospective, multiple-dose, two-phase pharmacokinetic study. SETTING: University research center. PATIENTS: Eight adult patients with HIV infection who had been receiving and tolerating indinavir 800 mg-ritonavir 100 mg twice/day for at least 2 weeks. Intervention. After 12-hour pharmacokinetic sampling was performed on all patients (period A), fosamprenavir (a prodrug of amprenavir) 700 mg twice/day was coadministered for 5 days, with a repeat 12-hour pharmacokinetic sampling performed on the fifth day (period B). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for indinavir, ritonavir, and amprenavir: area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 12 hours after dosing (AUC(0-12)), maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), and 12-hour plasma concentration (C(12)). For each parameter, the geometric mean, as well as the geometric mean ratio (GMR) comparing period B with period A, were calculated. Indinavir C(max) was lowered by 20% (GMR 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.96), AUC(0-12) was lowered by 6% (GMR 0.94, 95% CI 0.74-1.21), and C(12) was increased by 28% (GMR 1.28, 95% CI 0.78-2.10). Ritonavir AUC(0-12) was 20% lower (GMR 0.80, 95% CI 0.54-1.19), C(max) was 15% lower (GMR 0.85, 95% CI 0.55-1.32), and C(12) was 7% lower (GMR 0.93, 95% CI 0.49-1.76). With the exception of indinavir C(max), the changes in indinavir and ritonavir pharmacokinetic parameters observed after fosamprenavir coadministration were not statistically significant. The geometric means of amprenavir AUC(0-12), C(max), and C(12) were 41,517 ng*hour/ml (95% CI 30,317-56,854 ng*hr/ml), 5572 ng/ml (95% CI 4330-7170 ng/ml), and 2421 ng/ml (95% CI 1578-3712 ng/ml), respectively. CONCLUSION: The combination of indinavir 800 mg-ritonavir 100 mg-fosamprenavir 700 mg twice/day appears to be devoid of a clinically significant drug-drug interaction and should be evaluated as an alternative regimen in salvage HIV treatment. This combination may be suitable as part of a background regimen to optimize the therapeutic benefit of newer classes of antiretroviral agents such as the integrase and coreceptor inhibitors in the treatment of multidrug-resistant viruses.

Development of a macrophage-based nanoparticle platform for antiretroviral drug delivery.

Complex dosing regimens, costs, side effects, biodistribution limitations, and variable drug pharmacokinetic patterns have affected the long-term efficacy of antiretroviral medicines. To address these problems, a nanoparticle indinavir (NP-IDV) formulation packaged into carrier bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs) was developed. Drug distribution and disease outcomes were assessed in immune-competent and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected humanized immune-deficient mice, respectively. In the former, NP-IDV formulation contained within BMMs was adoptively transferred. After a single administration, single-photon emission computed tomography, histology, and reverse-phase-high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) demonstrated robust lung, liver, and spleen BMMs and drug distribution. Tissue and sera IDV levels were greater than or equal to 50 microM for 2 weeks. NP-IDV-BMMs administered to HIV-1-challenged humanized mice revealed reduced numbers of virus-infected cells in plasma, lymph nodes, spleen, liver, and lung, as well as, CD4(+) T-cell protection. We conclude that a single dose of NP-IDV, using BMMs as a carrier, is effective and warrants consideration for human testing.

Genotypic resistance analyses in nucleoside-pretreated patients failing an indinavir containing regimen: results from a randomized comparative trial: (Novavir ANRS 073).

BACKGROUND: Different studies have shown that most patients failing a first-line treatment containing a protease-inhibitor (PI) had low PI plasma levels and no PI-related resistance mutations. NOVAVIR was a randomized trial comparing stavudine/lamivudine/indinavir (d4T/3TC/IDV) and zidovudine/lamivudine/indinavir (AZT/3TC/IDV) in patients pretreated with AZT, didanosine (ddI) and/or zalcitabine (ddC) but naive for PIs. OBJECTIVE: To study the mechanisms of virological failure in NOVAVIR trial through analyses of genotypic resistance profiles of reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease (PR), and plasma IDV concentrations at time to failure. METHODS: Plasma HIV-RNA PR and RT sequences were determined in 27 failing patients (d4T/3TC/IDV n=11; AZT/3TC/IDV n=16) at baseline and at time to failure. IDV plasma measurements were performed in both samples. RESULTS: At baseline, 20 out of the 27 patients had at least two thymidine analogs associated mutations. At time to failure, mutation M184V in the RT gene was present in 22 out of the 27 failing patients. Thirteen out of the 27 (48%) patients had acquisition of PI mutations compared to baseline sequence. Of the 26 patients with adherence data, 13 (50%) subjects were classified as having difficulty in adherence. The proportion of patients with low adherence was higher in the subgroup of patients failing without acquisition of new PI mutations. CONCLUSIONS: In patients experienced with NRTIs, failure to PI-containing regimen may occur in spite of appropriate adherence to therapy and is associated with emergence of PI mutations in half of the cases. These results suggest that, although PIs have a high genetic barrier, sub-optimal activity of associated drugs may favor the selection of PI resistance mutations.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and protease inhibitors in HIV-1-infected patients.

OBJECTIVES: We have investigated whether chemotherapy for HIV-related systemic non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) affects the pharmacokinetics of protease inhibitors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, open-label, non-randomized, two-way crossover trial in HIV-1-infected patients treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy and chemotherapy for NHL. Seven patients received indinavir at a dosage of 800 mg three times daily and three patients received nelfinavir at a dosage of 750 mg three times daily. Chemotherapy consisted of adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisolone (CHOP). Each patient had blood samples for protease inhibitor pharmacokinetics drawn concomitantly with or independently of the CHOP cycle. RESULTS: When indinavir was given concomitantly with CHOP, the AUC(0-8) increased by 38% (20.5 +/- 9.0 versus 14.9 +/- 9.5 mg.h/L; P=0.03), and was comparable to historical controls. By contrast, the AUC(0-8) of indinavir administered without CHOP was lower than expected. A similar trend was observed with nelfinavir. Likewise, we observed a significant number of patients with C(0) and C(8) below the IC(50) for the wild-type virus (0.1 mg/L) when the drug was administered without CHOP. CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic drug monitoring of protease inhibitors should be part of the work-up in HIV-infected patients receiving chemotherapy for NHL.

Plasma levels of indinavir and nelfinavir at time of virologic response may have a different impact on the risk of further virologic failure in HIV-infected patients.

Indinavir and nelfinavir plasma levels were studied in 407 patients having plasma HIV RNA <500 copies/mL after 4 months of treatment with these drugs. For each drug, an observed/predicted (O/P) ratio was calculated between individual and mean time-adjusted population plasma drug levels. The relationship between the O/P ratio and the risk of rebound of plasma HIV RNA >500 copies/mL beyond month 4 was studied using Cox proportional hazard models. Median follow-up was 20 months. There was no association between indinavir plasma levels and risk of virologic rebound, whereas low nelfinavir + M8 (active nelfinavir metabolite) plasma levels were associated with a higher risk of virologic rebound. In multivariate analysis, the adjusted relative hazard of virologic rebound for patients with an O/P ratio of nelfinavir + M8 metabolite <0.8 compared with others was 2.2 (P = 0.01). In some patients, plasma levels of nelfinavir sufficient to achieve early viral response may not be sufficient to maintain it in the long term. This may be related to insufficient compliance with dietary recommendations. Monitoring of nelfinavir plasma levels thus seems useful, even in patients having early virologic response.

Overcoming resistance: virologic response to a salvage regimen with the combination of ritonavir plus indinavir.

PURPOSE: To explore the possibility of overcoming resistance to protease inhibitors (PIs) and to determine the resistance cutoff values that continue to predict treatment failure with a dual PI regimen. METHOD: We performed a prospective study of 53 patients who had failed in several PIs and who were included in a ritonavir (RTV) plus indinavir (IDV) salvage regimen. Median HIV RNA level decrease was evaluated according to resistance assays and indinavir trough levels. RESULTS: Eighty-seven percent of patients had previously failed on an IDV-containing regimen. Overall, median HIV RNA decrease was -1.25 log(10) copies/mL after 3 months on therapy. A significant blunted virologic response was observed only in isolates with more than 12 substitutions including the V82A (-0.75 vs. -1.3 log(10) copies/mL; p =.04), or in isolates with more than 30 fold-increase in the IC(50) (-0.43 vs. -1.2 log(10) copies/mL). Higher drug levels were observed in patients with resistant isolates who achieved an HIV RNA decrease greater than 1 log (1742 vs. 1100 ng/mL). CONCLUSION: Our preliminary data suggest the possibility of overcoming resistance with the combination of RTV plus IDV. They also suggest the need for establishing new resistance cutoff values when using PIs in combination.

Effect of zidovudine resistance mutations on virologic response to treatment with zidovudine or stavudine, each in combination with lamivudine and indinavir.

The authors studied the effect of zidovudine (ZDV) resistance mutation on virologic response to treatment with ZDV or stavudine (d4T) each in combination with lamivudine and indinavir. Viral genotyping was performed on plasma HIV-1 RNA at study entry and concerned 155 patients previously treated with ZDV, didanosine, or zalcitabine and enrolled in the NOVAVIR (Agence National de Recherche sur le SIDA [ANRS] 073) trial. Three virologic responses were investigated: early response (<50 copies/mL at week 24), late response (<500 copies/mL at week 80), and virologic failure (two HIV-1 RNA >5000 copies/mL). Patients were classified as resistant or susceptible to ZDV according to the ANRS algorithm. Plasma viral RNA from 123 of 155 patients had two or more ZDV resistance mutations. The number of ZDV resistance mutations was positively correlated with the duration of prior antiviral therapy (p <.001). At week 24, 74% and 77% of patients with virus classified as resistant were responders in the d4T and ZDV arm, respectively. Similar results were found at week 80. Virologic failure was reached in 7 of 24 patients with virus classified as susceptible and in 26 of 131 patients with resistant virus (p =.29). In the ZDV arm, patients classified as resistant had longer times to virologic failure than those classified as susceptible (p =.003). In conclusion, sustained virologic response despite presence of ZDV resistance mutations implies that these mutations do not preclude an early and durable response to treatment with a potent three-drug regimen in these patients. Patients susceptible to ZDV had lower median mean corpuscular volumes and lower random indinavir levels, suggesting that adherence was the main reason for failure.

CD4 response is correlated with peak plasma concentrations of indinavir in adults with undetectable human immunodeficiency virus ribonucleic acid.

We retrospectively evaluated correlates of increases in CD4 cell count in antiretroviral agent-naive subjects with fewer than 50 copies per milliliter of plasma human immunodeficiency virus ribonucleic acid who were participating in a study of indinavir, lamivudine, and zidovudine therapy. Pharmacologic data from intensive pharmacokinetic studies and baseline patient characteristics were evaluated as predictors of the increase in CD4 count from baseline to weeks 24, 56, and 80. Relations were investigated with regression analysis. Of all covariates, maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) of indinavir was significantly and uniquely associated with increases in CD4 count from baseline to all end points (P =.002 at week 80; n = 20). At week 80, subjects with a C(max) greater than the overall group median value of 7 microg/ml had an increase in CD4 count of 358 cells/microl versus 197 cells/microl for those with a C(max) less than 7 microg/ml (P =.006). These data suggest distinct pharmacodynamic relations exist for immune reconstitution and suppression of plasma human immunodeficiency virus ribonucleic acid. We hypothesize this new finding may be associated with expression of P-glycoprotein.

Differences in the detection of three HIV-1 protease inhibitors in non-blood compartments: clinical correlations.

PURPOSE: To study the presence of three HIV-1 protease inhibitors (PIs) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), semen, and lymph nodes and to assess the correlations with residual viral replication in these compartments. METHOD: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of sanctuary samples from 41 HIV-infected patients on stable highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens containing indinavir, nelfinavir, or lopinavir combined with ritonavir (lopinavir/r) and a longitudinal analysis of PI levels and HIV-1 RNA in plasma and CSF of 6 additional patients on nelfinavir or lopinavir/r monotherapy (3 cases each). Plasma, CSF, semen, and a lymph node (LN) biopsy were taken on the same day. Samples were assayed for PI concentrations, HIV-1 RNA levels, and, when detectable, sequencing of the reverse transcriptase and protease genes on seminal viral RNA. RESULTS: In the cross-sectional analysis, the CSF/plasma ratio was 0.14 for indinavir. Nelfinavir and lopinavir/r were consistently undetectable in CSF. The semen/plasma ratio was 1.9 for indinavir, 0.07 for nelfinavir, and 0.07 for lopinavir. The LN/plasma ratio was 2.07 for indinavir, 0.58 for nelfinavir, 0.21 for lopinavir, and 0.64 for ritonavir. Plasma HIV-1 RNA was <50 copies/mL in 28 patients and was detectable in 13 patients. HIV-1 RNA was <50 copies/mL in CSF samples when plasma RNA was undetectable. Three semen samples taken from patients with viremia <50 copies/mL showed detectable HIV-1 RNA with resistance mutations. HIV-1 RNA was detectable in all LNs, with no differences in patients on indinavir compared with those on nelfinavir or lopinavir/r. In the longitudinal analysis, HIV-1 RNA decreased in the plasma of the 6 patients on nelfinavir or lopinavir/r monotherapy, although CSF HIV-1 RNA decreased only in patients on lopinavir/r. CONCLUSION: Major differences exist between PIs in terms of detection in non-blood compartments. An undetectable PI level in CSF does not rule out drug activity in the brain for lopinavir/r, although this is not the case for nelfinavir. Poor penetration of PIs in semen in some patients can lead to double nucleoside therapy in this compartment. The persistence of HIV-1 RNA in LNs does not seem to be related to PI levels in this tissue.

Carbamazepine--indinavir interaction causes antiretroviral therapy failure.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of antiretroviral therapy failure caused by an interaction between carbamazepine and indinavir. CASE SUMMARY: A 48-year-old HIV-positive white man was treated with antiretroviral triple therapy, consisting of indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine. His HIV-RNA (viral load) became undetectable (<400 copies/mL) less than two months after this therapy was started; this was confirmed one month later. Shortly after the start of antiretroviral therapy, the patient developed herpes zoster, which was treated with famciclovir. Tramadol was initially prescribed for postherpetic neuralgia; however, this was substituted with carbamazepine due to insufficient analgesic effect. Indinavir plasma concentrations decreased substantially during carbamazepine therapy. Carbamazepine was stopped after 2.5 months and, two weeks later, the HIV-RNA was detectable (6 x 103 copies/mL). Resistance for lamivudine was observed in that blood sample; resistance for zidovudine might have been present, and resistance to indinavir was not detected. A few months later, a further increase of the HIV-RNA occurred (300 x 103 copies/mL), after which the therapy was switched to a new antiretroviral regimen containing nevirapine, didanosine, and stavudine. DISCUSSION: Physicians may prescribe carbamazepine for HIV-infected patients to treat seizures or postherpetic neuralgia, which are complications of opportunistic infections such as herpes zoster or toxoplasmosis. Carbamazepine is a potent enzyme inducer, predominantly of the CYP3A enzyme system, while HIV-protease inhibitors such as indinavir are substrates for and inhibitors of CYP3A. Therefore, an interaction between these drugs could be expected. A low dose of carbamazepine (200 mg/d) and the usual dose of indinavir (800 mg q8h) in our patient resulted in carbamazepine concentrations within the therapeutic range for epilepsy treatment; indinavir concentrations dropped substantially. The virologic, resistance, and plasma drug concentration data, as well as the chronology of events, are highly indicative of antiretroviral treatment failure due to the interaction between carbamazepine and indinavir. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant use of carbamazepine and indinavir may cause failure of antiretroviral therapy due to insufficient indinavir plasma concentrations. Drugs other than carbamazepine should be considered to prevent this interaction. Amitriptyline or gabapentin are alternatives for postherpetic neuralgia; valproic acid or lamotrigine are alternatives for seizures. When alternate drug therapy is not possible, dosage adjustments, therapeutic drug monitoring, and careful clinical observation may help reduce adverse clinical consequences.

Alteration in indinavir clearance during interleukin-2 infusions in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of interleukin-2 (IL-2) infusions on the pharmacokinetics of indinavir in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. DESIGN: Observational, noncontrolled trial and prospective, open-label, nonrandomized, pharmacokinetic study. SETTING: Government research hospital. PATIENTS: Seventeen patients receiving indinavir 800 mg every 8 hours and a 5-day continuous infusion of recombinant IL-2. INTERVENTIONS: Observational study: trough indinavir concentrations were measured on day 1 and day 5 of IL-2 as part of a clinical trial. Prospective study: serial plasma samples were collected on days 1 and 5 of IL-2 to determine indinavir concentrations. Samples were also collected over the study period to determine IL-6 concentrations. The data were fit by a one-compartment model that allowed clearance to change based on IL-6 production and by standard noncompartmental equations. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The area under the curve of indinavir increased in eight of nine patients by a mean of 88% (range -29-215%) between days 1 and 5 of IL-2 infusion. Over this period, IL-6 concentrations also increased in all patients and indinavir clearance significantly decreased. Observational data in eight patients from the clinical trial showed significantly increased indinavir trough concentrations from 264+/-493 to 670+/-677 ng/ml in the presence of IL-2. CONCLUSION: Indinavir concentrations were altered during IL-2 infusions, possibly by induction of IL-6. Investigation into the effects of other proinflammatory cytokines is warranted.

Selected highlights on women and HIV from the 5th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections.

AIDS: Many sessions at the 5th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections dealt specifically with HIV infection and treatment in women. Highlights are presented from several sessions, including indinavir blood levels at various points in the menstrual cycle, abnormal kidney function associated with women taking indinavir, abnormal pap smears in women with high viral load, the relationship between viral load and the increased risk of death in women, and the impact of ddI crossing the placenta in pregnant women. Information is given on each presentation, including clinical trial results, side effects, and impacts on disease progression.^ieng