Intra-Abdominal Candidiasis in Cancer Patients: A 10-Year Experience in a Middle-Income Country.

BACKGROUND: Invasive candidiasis (IC) represents a significant threat to both mortality and morbidity, especially among vulnerable populations. Intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC) frequently occurs in critically ill and cancer patients, with these specific groups carrying a heightened risk for such invasive fungal infections. Despite this, there is a noticeable lack of attention to IAC in cancer patients within the literature, highlighting a critical gap that requires urgent consideration. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to explore the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of IAC and identify prognostic factors in a cancer centre in a middle-income country over 10 years. PATIENTS/METHODS: A retrospective cohort observational study of adults diagnosed with IAC was conducted at the Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), a tertiary hospital specialising in oncological diseases with 499 beds, including 85 intensive care unit (ICU) beds, from December 2009 through May 2021. RESULTS: A total of 128 episodes were included: 67.2% admitted to the ICU; 54.7% males; and median age 62 years. The predominant diagnosis was peritonitis (75.8%). Blood culture samples were collected from 128 patients upon admission, revealing candidemia in 17.2% (22). The most frequently isolated were C. albicans (n = 65, 50.8%) and C. glabrata (n = 42, 32.8%). Antifungal treatment was administered to 91 (71%) patients, with fluconazole (64.8%) and echinocandins (23.4%) being the most common choices. A significant proportion of these patients had a history of abdominal surgery or antibiotic use. Independent factors associated with 30-day mortality included the median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of 6 (OR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.094-1.562, p = 0.003), days of treatment (median 10.5) (OR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.870-0.993, p = 0.031) and abdominal source control (78.1%) (OR = 0.148, 95% CI 0.030-0.719, p = 0.018). The 30-day mortality rate was 41.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study underscores the critical importance of implementing effective source control as a key strategy for reducing mortality in IAC.

The Open Abdomen After Intra-Abdominal Contamination in Emergency General Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Delayed fascial closure (DFC) is an increasingly utilized technique in emergency general surgery (EGS), despite a lack of data regarding its benefits. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of DFC versus immediate fascial closure (IFC) in EGS patients with intra-abdominal contamination. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted using the 2013-2020 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Adult EGS patients who underwent an exploratory laparotomy with intra-abdominal contamination [wound classification III (contaminated) or IV (dirty)] were included. Patients with agreed upon indications for DFC were excluded. A propensity-matched analysis was performed. The primary outcome was 30-d mortality. RESULTS: We identified 36,974 eligible patients. 16.8% underwent DFC, of which 51.7% were female, and the median age was 64 y. After matching, there were 6213 pairs. DFC was associated with a higher risk of mortality (15.8% versus 14.2%, P = 0.016), pneumonia (11.7% versus 10.1%, P = 0.007), pulmonary embolism (1.9% versus 1.6%, P = 0.03), and longer hospital stay (11 versus 10 d, P < 0.001). No significant differences in postoperative sepsis and deep surgical site infection rates between the two groups were observed. Subgroup analyses by preoperative diagnosis (diverticulitis, perforation, and undifferentiated sepsis) showed that DFC was associated with longer hospital stay in all subgroups, with a higher mortality rate in patients with diverticulitis (8.1% versus 6.1%, P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of intra-abdominal contamination, DFC is associated with longer hospital stay and higher rates of mortality and morbidity. DFC was not associated with decreased risk of infectious complications. Further studies are needed to clearly define the indications of DFC.

Postoperative morbidity following Hartmann's procedure in comparison to anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer-a population-based study.

AIM: There is ongoing controversy regarding the extent to which Hartmann's procedure (HP) should be used in rectal cancer treatment. This study was designed to investigate 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality following HP, anterior resection (AR) and abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer using a national registry. METHODS: All patients operated for rectal cancer, tumour height 5-15 cm, between the years 2010 and 2017, were identified through the Swedish colorectal cancer registry. RESULTS: A total of 8476 patients were included: 1210 (14%) undergoing HP, 5406 (64%) AR and 1860 (22%) APR. HP was associated with an increased risk of intra-abdominal infection (OR 1.7, CI 1.26-2.28, P = 0.0004) compared to AR and APR, while APR was related to an increased risk of overall complications (OR 1.18, CI 1.01-1.40, P = 0.040). No significant difference was observed in the rate of reoperations and readmissions between HP, AR and APR, and type of surgical procedure was not a risk factor for 30-day mortality. Findings from a subgroup analysis of patients with a tumour 5-7 cm from the anal verge revealed that HP was not associated with increased risk for complications or 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: For patients where AR is not appropriate HP is a valid alternative with a favourable outcome. APR was associated with the highest overall 30-day complication rate.

Identification of Risk Factors for Intra-Abdominal Candidiasis.

Background: Intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. Identifying high-risk populations may facilitate early and selective directed therapy in appropriate patients and avoid unwarranted treatment and any associated adverse effects in those who are low risk. Patients and Methods: This retrospective, case-control study included patients >18 years of age admitted from July 1, 2010 to July 1, 2021 who had a microbiologically confirmed intra-abdominal infection (gastrointestinal culture positive for either a Candida spp. [cases] or bacterial isolate [controls] collected intra-operatively or from a drain placed within 24 hours). Patients receiving peritoneal dialysis treatment or with a peritoneal dialysis catheter in place or treated at an outside hospital were excluded. Multivariable regression was utilized to identify independent risk factors for the development of IAC. Results: Five hundred twenty-three patients were screened, and 250 met inclusion criteria (125 per cohort). Multivariable analysis identified exposure to corticosteroids (odds ratio [OR], 5.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.52-13.32; p < 0.0001), upper gastrointestinal tract surgery (OR, 3.51; 95% CI, 1.25-9.87; p = 0.017), and mechanical ventilation (OR, 3.09; 95% CI 1.5-6.37; p = 0.002) were independently associated with IAC. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) and goodness of fit were 0.7813 and p = 0.5024, respectively. Conclusions: Exposure to corticosteroids, upper gastrointestinal tract surgery, and mechanical ventilation are independent risk factors for the development of microbiologically confirmed IAC suggesting these factors may help identify high-risk individuals requiring antifungal therapy.

Impact of postoperative intra-abdominal infectious complications on survival outcomes in patients with gastric cancer who underwent laparoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative intra-abdominal infection is known to adversely affect survival outcomes in patients with gastric cancer; however, previous reports have investigated this complication only in open surgery. This adverse effect is expected to be weakened by less invasive surgery, such as a laparoscopic approach, by way of maintaining immune function. METHODS: This study included 1223 patients with gastric cancer who underwent open (n = 439) or laparoscopic (n = 784) curative surgery between 2010 and 2015. For each approach, patients were divided into two groups based on presence or absence of postoperative intra-abdominal infection of Clavien-Dindo grade II or higher (C-group and NC-group, respectively). Survival outcomes were compared in propensity-matched cohorts to evaluate the impact of the complication. RESULTS: The incidences of Clavien-Dindo ≥ grade II postoperative intra-abdominal infectious complications were 9.7% (43/439) in open surgery and 9.8% (70/714) in laparoscopic surgery. After propensity score matching, 86 patients in open surgery and 138 in laparoscopic surgery were extracted for analysis. The 5-year overall survival rate in the open C-group (n = 43) was worse than that in the open NC-group (n = 43) but with no significant difference (70.9% vs. 82.8%, log-rank P = 0.18). The 5-year overall survival rates were equivalent between the laparoscopic C-group (n = 69) and the laparoscopic NC-group (n = 69) (90.5% vs. 90.4%, log-rank P = 0.99). CONCLUSION: In general, postoperative intra-abdominal infection adversely affects survival outcomes; however, its impact may be weakened by less invasive surgery. Further evaluation using larger datasets is necessary before reaching definitive conclusions.

Prognostic analysis of patients with intra-abdominal infectious complications after laparoscopic-assisted and open radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer - A propensity score-matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the incidence and prognosis of intra-abdominal infectious complications (IaICs) after laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) and open radical gastrectomy (OG) for gastric cancer. METHODS: The data of patients who underwent radical gastrectomy (LAG and OG) for gastric cancer at the Fujian Medical University Union Hospital from January 2000 to December 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce bias. The incidence and prognosis of postoperative IaICs in the two groups were analyzed. RESULTS: After PSM, no significant difference was found in the baseline data between OG (n = 913) and LAG (n = 913). The incidence of IaICs after OG and LAG was 4.1% and 5.1%, respectively (p = 0.264). The Cox multivariate analysis showed that IaICs were an independent risk factor for overall survival (OS) of patients undergoing gastrectomy (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.65, p < 0.001). Further, LAG was an independent protective factor for OS among the patients with IaICs (HR: 0.54, p = 0.036), while tumor diameter of ≥50 mm (p = 0.01) and pathological TNM stage III (p < 0.001) were independent risk factors. The 5-year OS rate was higher in the patients with IaICs who underwent LAG than in those who underwent OG (51.1% vs. 32.4%, p = 0.042). The prognostic nutritional index was similar in both groups before surgery (p = 0.220) but lower on the first, third, and fifth days after OG than after LAG (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to OG, LAG can improve the prognosis of patients with postoperative IaICs and is therefore recommended for patients at a high risk for IaICs.

Risk Factors for Intra-Abdominal Infections Caused by Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae in a Surgical Setting.

Background: The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for acquisition of intra-abdominal infections (IAI) caused by carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) in surgical patients. Methods: A matched case-control study was performed. We included all cases with CPE-related IAI acquired during admission to a general surgery department from January 2013 to December 2018, and they were matched with control subjects with IAI caused by non-resistant bacteria (ratio 1:3). Independent risk factors were obtained by logistic regression. Results: Forty patients with IAI-CPE were matched with 120 control subjects. Independent risk factors for acquisition of IAI-CPE were previous hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] 2.56; 95% confidence interval [CI] l 1.01-6.49; p = 0.047), digestive endoscopy (OR 4.11; 95% CI 1.40-12.07; p = 0.010), carbapenem therapy (OR 9.54; 95% CI 3.33-27.30; p < 0.001), and aminoglycoside use (OR 45.41; 95% CI 7.90-261.06; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Four clinical factors can identify patients at high-risk of IAI-CPE.

Clinical implications of multidrug-resistant microorganisms and fungi isolated from patients with intra-abdominal infections in the Republic of Korea: a multicenter study.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of fungi and multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) isolated from patients with intra-abdominal infections (IAIs). This multicenter study included consecutive patients admitted for microbiologically proven IAIs at 6 university-affiliated hospitals in South Korea between 2016 and 2018. A total of 1571 patients were enrolled. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that the isolation of MDROs, isolation of Candida spp., underlying renal diseases, Charlson comorbidity score ≥ 3, septic shock, failure to receive a required surgery or invasive intervention, secondary bacteremia due to IAIs, and lower body mass index were found to be independent predictors for 28-day mortality. However, the isolation of Enterococcus spp. was not identified as a significant risk factor. MDROs and Candida spp. were found in 42 (2.7%) and 395 (25.1%), patients respectively. The isolation of MDROs or Candida spp. was a surrogate marker of 28-day mortality.

Intra-Abdominal Infections by Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae in a Surgical Unit: Counting Mortality, Stay, and Costs.

Background: Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE)-related infections are a problem in public health at present, including intra-abdominal infections (IAI) and surgical populations. The aim of this study was to determine mortality and related risk factors, length of stay (LOS,) and costs for CPE-IAI in surgical patients. Patients and Methods: Review of CPE-related IAI acquired during admission in a general surgery department from January 2013 to December 2018. A mortality analysis was performed specifically in patients with CPE-IAI, and a global analysis of IAI including patients with CPE-IAI (cases) and matched patients with IAI by non-resistant bacteria (controls). Results: Forty patients with CPE-IAI were included, OXA-48-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae was present in 85%. Global mortality rate at 30 days for CPE-IAI was 17.5%; mortality-related factors were: solid tumor (p = 0.009), metastatic disease (p = 0.005), immunodeficiency (p = 0.039), blood transfusion (p = 0.009), and septic shock (p = 0.011). Predictors related to mortality for IAI in the global analysis included age (p = 0.046), Charlson index (p = 0.036), CPE isolation (p = 0.003), and septic shock (p < 0.001). Median global LOS was 43 days (IQR 27-64) in patients with CPE-IAI, and 27 days (IQR 18-35) in controls (p < 0.001). Median global cost of admission was $31,671 (IQR 14,006-55,745) for patients with CPE-IAI and $20,306 (IQR 11,974-27,947) for controls (p = 0.064). The most relevant locations of underlying disease for CPE-IAI were: colorectal (32.5%) with 57-day LOS (IQR 34-65) and cost of $42,877 (IQR 18,780-92,607), and pancreas (25%) with 60-day LOS (IQR 32-99) and cost of $56,371 (IQR 32,590-113,979). Conclusion: Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae-related IAI is associated with substantial mortality, LOS, and costs. Factors related to CPE-IAI mortality are solid tumor, metastatic disease, immunodeficiency, blood transfusion, and septic shock. Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolation in IAI implies higher risk of mortality.

Procalcitonin as an Early Predictor of Intra-abdominal Infections Following Gastric Cancer Resection.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of postoperative procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) for their ability to detect Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) in patients after GC surgery. METHODS: Patients who underwent elective gastrectomy for primary GC were retrospectively enrolled between October 2018 and October 2019. The PCT and CRP levels and white blood cell (WBC) count were measured before surgery and on postoperative days (POD) 1, 3, 5, and 7. The differences in serum PCT, CRP, and WBC levels between IAIs and non-IAIs groups were compared. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified independent clinical factors that predicted postoperative IAIs. RESULTS: A total of 155 patients who underwent GC surgery were enrolled. IAIs were observed in 12 patients (7.74%). The postoperative CRP and PCT values in the IAI group were higher than those in the non-IAI group. PCT had superior diagnostic accuracy on POD 3 (area under the curve 0.769) with an optimal cutoff value of 2.03 ng/mL, yielding 75% sensitivity, 87.4% specificity, and 97.6% negative predictive value. Multivariate analysis identified a PCT level of 2.03 mg/mL or greater on POD 3 as a significant predictive factor for IAIs after gastrectomy (odds ratio: 21.447, 95% confidence interval: 5.081-91.672). CONCLUSIONS: PCT values less than 2.03 ng/mL on POD 3 is an excellent negative predictor of IAIs, which may ensure a safe early discharge after gastric cancer surgery.

Comparison of Intra-Abdominal Infection Risk Between Intracorporeal and Extracorporeal Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy for Colon Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: No previous study has compared the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) between intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) and extracorporeal anastomosis (EA) related to intra-abdominal infection in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the risk of SSI in IA and EA in this context. METHODS: From July 2014 to March 2018, 101 consecutive (median age, 73 years; male, 54) patients underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer. The IA and EA groups consisted of 51 and 50 cases, respectively. After either IA or EA, lavage was performed with 100 mL of saline in the area surrounding the anastomosis, and a sample was collected for bacterial culture. The product of the virulence score and dose of bacterial contamination score called the risk of SSI score was evaluated in both groups, and short-term outcomes in both groups were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in patient characteristics between the 2 groups. The frequency of organ/space SSI in the IA group was significantly higher than that in the EA group (7.8% vs 0%, P = .04). The risk of SSI score was significantly higher in the IA group than in the EA group (median, 9 vs 1, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with EA, IA in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy increased organ/space SSI rates, signifying intra-abdominal infection. We strongly recommend prevention of intra-abdominal infection when performing an IA.

Rates, predictors, and mortality of sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Due to the high incidence and mortality of sepsis-associated acute kidney injury, a significant number of studies have explored the causes of sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (AKI). However, the opinions on relevant predictive risk factors remain inconclusive. This study aimed to provide a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the predisposing factors for sepsis-associated AKI. METHOD: A systematic literature search was performed in the Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science, databases, with an end-date of 25th May 2019. Valid data were retrieved in compliance with specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULT: Forty-seven observational studies were included for analysis, achieving a cumulative patient number of 55,911. The highest incidence of AKI was caused by septic shock. Thirty-one potential risk factors were included in the meta-analysis. Analysis showed that 20 factors were statistically significant. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI), as well as the prevalence of the most frequently-seen predisposing factors for sepsis-associated AKI, were as follows: septic shock [2.88 (2.36-3.52), 60.47%], hypertension [1.43 (1.20-1.70), 38.39%], diabetes mellitus [1.59 (1.47-1.71), 27.57%], abdominal infection [1.44 (1.32-1.58), 30.87%], the administration of vasopressors [2.95 (1.67-5.22), 64.61%], the administration of vasoactive drugs [3.85 (1.89-7.87), 63.22%], mechanical ventilation [1.64 (1.24-2.16), 68.00%], positive results from blood culture [1.60 (1.35-1.89), 41.19%], and a history of smoking [1.60 (1.09-2.36), 43.09%]. Other risk factors included cardiovascular diseases, coronary artery diseases, liver diseases, unknown infections, the administration of diuretics and ACEI/ARB, the infection caused by gram-negative bacteria, and organ transplantation. CONCLUSION: Risk factors of S-AKI arise from a wide range of sources, making it difficult to predict and prevent this condition. Comorbidities, and certain drugs, are the main risk factors for S-AKI. Our review can provide guidance on the application of interventions to reduce the risks associated with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury and can also be used to tailor patient-specific treatment plans and management strategies in clinical practice.

Global Perspectives in Controversies Related to the Management of Intra-Abdominal Infections.

Background: Intra-abdominal infections (IAI) remain a substantial cause of worldwide morbidity, mortality, and healthcare cost burden. The World Surgical Infection Society (WSIS) was organized to help improve global outcomes from surgical infections. An initial project for the WSIS was to assess how surgeons treat common IAI in their regions. Methods: A 10-item questionnaire was distributed to members of four surgical societies dedicated to the study of surgical infections. Questions were related to common treatment decisions in the management of IAI, with the intention of identifying differences and potential controversies in patient care. Responses were analyzed by comparing percentages with 95% confidence intervals. Results: Globally, management was relatively similar for peritoneal irrigation (most commonly with saline or other crystalloid: China, 83.2% ± 5.8%; North America, 93.2% ± 6.4%; Europe, 85.7% ± 25.9%; and Latin America, 71.8% ± 6.9%). More varied responses were seen for the management of specific disease states; for instance, for cholangitis, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatic interventions were more common in North America (83.1% ± 9.6%) and less common in China (28.1% ± 7.0%). For appendiceal abscesses, percutaneous drainage and antibiotic treatment was most common in North America (93.2% ± 6.4%) and least common in Latin America (19.6% ± 6.1%). Additionally, the management of fascial and wound closures were different by region. Vacuum-assisted wound closure after fascial closure was utilized commonly in North America (32.2% ± 11.9%), Europe (28.6% ± 33.5%), and Latin America (27.6% ± 6.9%), however, was less commonly utilized in China (9.9% ± 4.4%), where there was higher rate of primary skin closure (85.7% ± 5.4%). Conclusion: Through its partnership with other surgical infection societies, the WSIS aims to develop evidence-based guidelines for more consistent pattern of IAI management globally. Delving further into why their practices differ may help improve worldwide outcomes.

Burden of Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections in Children in Nigeria: Recent Experience and Systematic Review.

Background: Intra-abdominal infections encompass a wide range of conditions from uncomplicated appendicitis to fecal peritonitis. Little is known about the burden of complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAIs) in children in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Method: This a report of recent experience and a systematic review of the burden in Nigeria. Results: Of 85 children with cIAIs, the most common primary cause was typhoid intestinal perforation (54; 63.5%) and complicated appendicitis (20; 23.5%). The complication rate after surgery was high, including surgical site infection (SSI) in 49 (57.6%), post-operative intra-abdominal abscess in 14 (16.5%), and complete abdominal wound dehiscence in 13 (15.3%). The rate of re-operation was 19 (22.4%) and 12 (14.1%) patients required re-admission for adhesion intestinal obstruction and unresolved SSI. Eight (9.4%) died from overwhelming infection. Systematic review revealed only a few publications, but these were mostly on specific causes of cIAIs and publications providing comprehensive data are lacking. Conclusion: Investment in research into cIAIs in children in LMICs is needed. Efforts need to be focused on the role of source control in reducing the high complication rate and mortality.

Global Health and Surgical Infection: From Neglect to Emerging Frontier.

Background: In past decades, surgical site infections (SSIs) were neglected and not given much global attention in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The risk and incidence of SSIs in LMICs continue to increase. Methods: We reviewed the limited quality data on SSIs and complicated intra-abdominal infections in these settings that have hampered advocacy and infection prevention and control efforts. Results: This review identifies the rising profile of global surgery that has resulted in efforts to scale up access to surgical care as well as increase surgical volumes to address unmet needs. The fallout of these efforts would be increasing SSI rates and a rising volume of laparotomies for intra-abdominal infections. Conclusion: Surgical infections are an emerging frontier in global health and surgery. There is an urgent need for global advocacy and investments in their prevention and control.

A Retrospective Review: Patient-Reported Preoperative Prescription Opioid, Sedative, or Antidepressant Use Is Associated with Worse Outcomes in Colorectal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Prescription opioid, sedative, and antidepressant use has been on the rise. The effect of these medications on outcomes in colorectal surgery has not been established. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of preoperative prescription opioid, sedative, and antidepressant use on postoperative outcomes following colorectal surgery. DESIGN: This study was a retrospective database and medical record review. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at University of Kentucky utilizing the local American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database. PATIENTS: All patients ≥18 years of age who underwent colorectal resection for all indications, excluding trauma, between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016, were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were the rates of 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Of 1201 patients, 30.2% used opioids, 18.4% used sedatives, and 28.3% used antidepressants preoperatively. Users of any medication class had higher ASA classification, rates of dyspnea, and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease than nonusers. Opioid users also had higher rates of ostomy creation, contaminated wound classification, prolonged operation time, and postoperative transfusion. Postoperatively, patients had higher rates of intra-abdominal infection (opioids: 21.5% vs 15.2%, p = 0.009; sedatives: 23.1% vs 15.7%, p = 0.01; antidepressants: 22.4% vs 15.0%, p = 0.003) and respiratory failure (opioids: 11.0% vs 6.3%, p = 0.007; sedatives: 12.2% vs 6.7%, p = 0.008; antidepressants: 10.9% vs 6.5%, p = 0.02). Reported opioid or sedative users had a prolonged hospital length of stay of 2 days (p < 0.001) compared with nonusers. After adjustment for all predictors of poor outcome, opioid and sedative use was associated with increased 30-day morbidity and mortality following colorectal procedures (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.07-1.91 and OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.05-2.08). LIMITATIONS: This study was a retrospective review and a single-institution study, and it had unmeasured confounders. CONCLUSIONS: We identified that patient-reported prescription opioid and sedative use is associated with higher 30-day composite adverse outcomes in colorectal resections, highlighting the need for the evaluation of opioid and sedative use as a component of the preoperative risk stratification. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B226. REVISIÓN RETROSPECTIVA: EL USO DE OPIOIDES, SEDANTES O ANTIDEPRESORES EN EL PREOPERATORIO SE ASOCIAN CON MALOS RESULTADOS EN CIRUGÍA COLORECTAL: El uso de opioides, sedantes y antidepresores esta en aumento. No se ha establecido el efecto de estos medicamentos en los resultados de la cirugía colorrectal.Evaluar el impacto del uso preoperatorio de opioides, sedantes y antidepresores en los resultados después de una cirugía colorrectal.Base de datos retrospectiva y revisión de registros médicos.Este estudio se realizó en la Universidad de Kentucky utilizando la base de datos del Proyecto de Mejora de Calidad Quirúrgica Nacional del Colegio Estadounidense de Cirujanos.Todos los pacientes ≥ 18 años que se sometieron a una resección colorrectal por diversas indicaciones, excluyendo los traumas, entre el 1 de Enero de 2013 y el 31 de Diciembre de 2016.Tasas de morbilidad y mortalidad postoperatorias a los 30 días.De 1201 pacientes, 30.2% usaron opioides, 18.4% usaron sedantes y 28.3% usaron antidepresores antes de la cirugía. Los pacientes tratados con cualquiera de los medicamentos mencionados, presentaban un ASA mas elevado, tasas de disnea y EPOC mas graves en comparación con pacientes sin tratamiento previo. Los consumidores de opioides también tuvieron tasas más altas de creación de ostomías, clasificación mas alta de heridas contaminadas, un tiempo de operación prolongado y transfusión postoperatoria mayor. Después de la cirugía los pacientes que tuvieron tasas más altas de infección intraabdominal (opioides: 21.5% vs 15.2%, p = 0.009, sedantes: 23.1% vs 15.7%, p = 0.01, antidepresivos: 22.4% vs 15.0%, p = 0.003) e insuficiencia respiratoria (opioides: 11.0% vs 6.3%, p = 0.007, sedantes: 12.2% vs 6.7%, p = 0.008, antidepresivos: 10.9% vs 6.5%, p = 0.02). Los consumidores de opioides o sedantes tuvieron una estadía hospitalaria prolongada de más de 2 días (p <0.001) en comparación con los consumidores. Después de haber realizado el ajuste de todos los predictores de mal pronóstico, el uso de opioides y sedantes se asoció con una mayor morbilidad y mortalidad a los 30 días después de cirugía colorrectal (OR 1.43 [IC 95% 1.07-1.91] y OR 1.48 [IC 95% 1.05-2.08], respectivamente)Revisión retrospectiva, estudio de una sola institución, factores de confusión no evaluados.Identificamos que el consumo de opiáceos y sedantes recetados a los pacientes se asocian con resultados adversos complejos más allá de 30 días en casos de resección colorrectal, destacando la necesidad de su respectiva evaluación como componentes de la estratificación de riesgo preoperatorio. Consulte Video Resumen http://links.lww.com/DCR/B226. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo).

Non-robotic minimally invasive gastrectomy as an independent risk factor for postoperative intra-abdominal infectious complications: A single-center, retrospective and propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer (GC) has gained widespread use as a safe curative procedure especially for early GC. AIM: To determine risk factors for postoperative complications after minimally invasive gastrectomy for GC. METHODS: Between January 2009 and June 2019, 1716 consecutive patients were referred to our division for primary GC. Among them, 1401 patients who were diagnosed with both clinical and pathological Stage III or lower GC and underwent robotic gastrectomy (RG) or laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) were enrolled. Retrospective chart review and multivariate analysis were performed for identifying risk factors for postoperative morbidity. RESULTS: Morbidity following minimally invasive gastrectomy was observed in 7.5% of the patients. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that non-robotic minimally invasive surgery, male gender, and an operative time of ≥ 360 min were significant independent risk factors for morbidity. Therefore, morbidity was compared between RG and LG. Accordingly, propensity-matched cohort analysis revealed that the RG group had significantly fewer intra-abdominal infectious complications than the LG group (2.5% vs 5.9%, respectively; P = 0.038), while no significant differences were noted for other local or systemic complications. Multivariate analyses of the propensity-matched cohort revealed that non-robotic minimally invasive surgery [odds ratio = 2.463 (1.070-5.682); P = 0.034] was a significant independent risk factor for intra-abdominal infectious complications. CONCLUSION: The findings showed that robotic surgery might improve short-term outcomes following minimally invasive radical gastrectomy by reducing intra-abdominal infectious complications.

Are Biologics Safe in the Immediate Postoperative Period? A Single-Center Evaluation of Consecutive Crohn's Surgical Patients.

BACKGROUND: There is no study to date examining the safety of initiating or restarting biologic therapy after major abdominal surgery for Crohn's disease. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine differences in the rates of 90-day superficial surgical site infections, intra-abdominal sepsis, and overall postoperative infectious complications among patients who were initiated on or restarted a biologic within 90 days postoperatively compared with those who were not. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at an IBD referral center. PATIENTS: Adult patients with Crohn's disease who received a biologic therapy within 90 days of a major abdominal operation between May 20, 2014, and December 31, 2018, were included. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Ninety-day superficial surgical site infection, intra-abdominal sepsis, and overall postoperative infectious complications were measured. RESULTS: A total of 680 patients with Crohn's disease were included: 351 were initiated on biologic therapy within 90 days after surgery and 329 were not. Patients exposed to biologic therapy postoperatively were younger (p < 0.001), had a lower BMI (p = 0.0014), were less often diabetic (p = 0.0011), and were more often exposed preoperatively to biologics (p < 0.0001) and immunomodulators (p < 0.0001) but not corticosteroids (p = 0.8399). Of those exposed postoperatively, nearly all (93.7%) had been on a biologics preoperatively, and most resumed the same biologic (68.0%). The median time to starting biologic therapy postoperatively was 31 days (range, 7-89 d). Postoperative biologic exposure was not associated with an increased risk of superficial surgical site infection (HR = 1.02 (95% CI, 0.95-1.09) per week; p = 0.59), intra-abdominal sepsis (HR = 1.07 (95% CI, 0.99-1.16); p = 0.73), or overall postoperative infectious complications (HR = 1.02 (95% CI, 0.98-1.07); p = 0.338); the overall rates of each at 90 days was 13%, 8%, and 28%. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its retrospective design and single-center data. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative initiation or resumption of biologic therapy did not increase 90-day rates of superficial surgical site infection, intra-abdominal sepsis, or total infectious complications after major abdominal surgery for Crohn's disease. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B207. ¿SON SEGUROS LOS FÁRMACOS BIOLÓGICOS EN EL POSTOPERATORIO INMEDIATO? UNA EVALUACIÓN DE UN SOLO CENTRO DE PACIENTES QUIRÚRGICOS CONSECUTIVOS CON ENFERMEDAD DE CROHN: No hay ningún estudio hasta la fecha que examine la seguridad de iniciar o reiniciar la terapia biológica después de una cirugía abdominal mayor en enfermedad de Crohn.Determinar las diferencias en las tasas a 90 días de infecciones del sitio quirúrgico superficial, sepsis intraabdominal y complicaciones infecciosas postoperatorias generales entre los pacientes en que se inició o reinició un biológico dentro de los 90 días después de la operación en comparación con aquellos que no lo recibieron.Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.Centro de referencia de enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal.Pacientes adultos con enfermedad de Crohn que recibieron una terapia biológica dentro de los 90 días de una operación abdominal mayor entre el 20 de mayo de 2014 y el 31 de diciembre de 2018.Infección superficial del sitio quirúrgico, sepsis intraabdominal y complicaciones infecciosas postoperatorias generales a 90 días.Se incluyeron un total de 680 pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn: 351 se iniciaron en terapia biológica dentro de los 90 días posteriores a la cirugía y 329 no. Los pacientes expuestos a terapia biológica después de la operación eran más jóvenes (p <0.001), tenían un índice de masa corporal más bajo (p = 0.0014), eran con menos frecuencia diabéticos (p = 0.0011) y estaban expuestos con mayor frecuencia preoperatoriamente a fármacos biológicos (p <0.0001) e inmunomoduladores (p <0.0001) pero no a corticosteroides (p = 0.8399). De los expuestos postoperatoriamente, casi todos (93.7%) habían estado en terapia biológica en el preoperatorio, y la mayoría reanudó la misma terapia biológica (68%). La mediana de tiempo para comenzar la terapia biológica después de la operación fue de 31 días (rango, 7-89 días). La exposición biológica postoperatoria no se asoció con un mayor riesgo de infección superficial del sitio quirúrgico (HR 1.02 (0.95-1.09) por semana, p = 0.59), sepsis intraabdominal. (HR: 1.07 (0.99-1.16), p = 0.73), o complicaciones infecciosas postoperatorias generales (HR: 1.02, intervalo de confianza del 95% 0.98-1.07, p = 0.338); las tasas generales de cada uno a los 90 días fue del 13%, 8% y 28%.Diseño retrospectivo, y datos de un centro único.El inicio o la reanudación en el postoperatorio de la terapia biológica no aumentaron las tasas a 90 días de infección superficial de sitio quirúrgico, sepsis intraabdominal o complicaciones infecciosas totales después de una cirugía abdominal mayor por enfermedad de Crohn. Consulte el Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B207. (Traducción-Dr Jorge Silva Velazco).

Biologics and 30-Day Postoperative Complications After Abdominal Operations for Crohn's Disease: Are There Differences in the Safety Profiles?

BACKGROUND: The evidence regarding the association of preoperative biologic exposure and postoperative outcomes remains controversial for both antitumor necrosis factor agents and vedolizumab and largely unknown for ustekinumab. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine differences in the rates of 30-day postoperative overall infectious complications and intra-abdominal septic complications among the 3 classes of biologic therapies as compared with no biologic therapy. DESIGN: This was a retrospective review. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at an IBD referral center. PATIENTS: Adult patients with Crohn's disease who received an antitumor necrosis factor, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, or no biologic therapy within 12 weeks of a major abdominal operation between May 20, 2014, and December 31, 2017, were included. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Thirty-day overall postoperative infectious complications and intra-abdominal septic complications were measured. RESULTS: A total of 712 patients with Crohn's disease were included; 272 patients were exposed to an antitumor necrosis factor agents, 127 to vedolizumab, 38 to ustekinumab, and 275 to no biologic therapy within the 12 weeks before an abdominal operation. Patients exposed to a biologic were more likely to be taking a concurrent immunomodulator, but there was no difference in concurrent corticosteroid usage. The particular class of biologic was not independently associated with total overall infectious complications. Vedolizumab was associated with an increased rate of intra-abdominal sepsis on univariate analysis but not on multivariable analysis. Combination immunosuppression was associated with both an increased rate of overall postoperative infectious complications and intra-abdominal sepsis. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its retrospective design and single-center data. CONCLUSIONS: The overall rate of total infectious complications or intra-abdominal septic complications was not increased based on preoperative exposure to a particular class of biologic. Rates increased with combination immunosuppression of biologic therapy with corticosteroids and previous abdominal resection. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B24. BIOLÓGICOS Y COMPLICACIONES POSTOPERATORIAS DE 30 DÍAS DESPUÉS DE LAS OPERACIONES ABDOMINALES PARA LA ENFERMEDAD DE CROHN: ¿EXISTEN DIFERENCIAS EN LOS PERFILES DE SEGURIDAD?:: La evidencia sobre la asociación de la exposición biológica preoperatoria y los resultados postoperatorios sigue siendo controvertida controversial tanto para los agentes del factor de necrosis tumoral (anti-TNF) como para el vedolizumab, y en gran parte desconocida para el ustekinumab.Determinar las diferencias en las tasas de complicaciones infecciosas generales postoperatorias de 30 días y complicaciones sépticas intraabdominales entre las tres clases de terapias biológicas en comparación con ninguna terapia biológica.Revisión retrospectiva.centro de referencia de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal.Pacientes adultos con enfermedad de Crohn que recibieron un factor de necrosis antitumoral, vedolizumab, ustekinumab o ningún tratamiento biológico dentro de las 12 semanas de una operación abdominal mayor entre el 5/20/2014 y el 12/31/2017.Complicaciones infecciosas postoperatorias generales de 30 días, complicaciones sépticas intraabdominales.Se incluyeron setecientos doce pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn; 272 pacientes fueron expuestos a un anti-TNF, 127 a vedolizumab, 38 a ustekinumab y 275 a ninguna terapia biológica dentro de las 12 semanas previas a una operación abdominal. Los pacientes expuestos a un producto biológico tenían más probabilidades de tomar un inmunomodulador concurrente, pero no hubo diferencias en el uso simultáneo de corticosteroides. La clase particular de productos biológicos no se asoció de forma independiente con las complicaciones infecciosas totales. Vedolizumab se asoció con una mayor tasa de sepsis intraabdominal en el análisis univariable, pero no en el análisis multivariable. La inmunosupresión combinada se asoció tanto con una mayor tasa de complicaciones infecciosas postoperatorias generales como con sepsis intraabdominal.Diseño retrospectivo, datos de centro único.La tasa general de complicaciones infecciosas totales o complicaciones sépticas intraabdominales no aumentó en función de la exposición preoperatoria a una clase particular de productos biológicos. Las tasas aumentaron con la combinación de inmunosupresión de la terapia biológica con corticosteroides y resección abdominal previa. Vea el Resumen del Video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B24.

Does C-reactive Protein Have a Predictive Role in the Early Diagnosis of Postoperative Complications After Bariatric Surgery? Systematic Review and Bayesian Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative leak and intra-abdominal infections are common after bariatric surgery with a significant impact on perioperative outcomes, hospital length of stay, and readmission rates. In the era of enhanced recovery programs, with patients being discharged from the hospital 24-36 h after surgery and potentially before developing any complications, an early indicator of postoperative complications may be decisive. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive role of the C-reactive protein (CRP) in the early diagnosis of complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were consulted. A systematic review and a fully Bayesian meta-analysis were conducted. RESULTS: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria for a total of 1401 patients. Overall, 57.7% underwent LSG while 42.3% underwent LRYGB. The pooled prevalence of postoperative complications was 9.8% (95% CI = 5-16%). The estimated pooled CRP cut-off value on postoperative day 1 (POD1) was 6.1 mg/dl with a significant diagnostic accuracy and a pooled area under the curve of 0.92 (95% credible interval (CrI) 0.73-0.98). The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 13.6 (95% CrI 8.40-15.9) and 0.16 (95% CrI 0.04-0.31), respectively. CONCLUSION: A CRP value lower than the derived cut-off of 6.1 mg/dl on POD1, combined with reassuring clinical signs, could be useful to rule out early postoperative leak and complications after LSG and LRYGB. In the context of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols, the integration of a CRP-based diagnostic algorithm as an additional complementary instrument may be valuable to reduce cost and improve outcomes and patient care.