Implementation and evaluation of a fertility preservation telehealth counseling intervention for males with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Most males with cystic fibrosis (MwCF) have congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens and require assisted reproductive technology to conceive, yet many have limited knowledge about how CF affects sexual and reproductive health (SRH). This study evaluates the feasibility, acceptability, and potential effectiveness of telehealth fertility preservation (FP) counseling for MwCF. METHODS: Pre-lung transplant MwCF ≥18 years, recruited from U.S. CF centers, social media, and via snowball sampling, received individualized telehealth counseling. Participants completed intervention feasibility/acceptability one week post-counseling and FP knowledge, care satisfaction, and self-efficacy assessments at baseline and two months post-counseling. We completed acceptability interviews one-week post-counseling and audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed results. We descriptively analyzed survey results and conducted pre/post comparisons using paired t-tests. RESULTS: Thirty MwCF (ages 22-49 years) completed counseling. Most were in a relationship (70 %) and White (86.7 %). Telehealth FP counseling was acceptable (M = 4.38/5 ± 0.60), appropriate (M = 4.37/5 ± 0.60), and feasible (M = 4.60/5 ± 0.45) to MwCF. FP knowledge (9.53 vs. 10.40/12; p = .010), care satisfaction (20.23 vs 26.67/32; p<.001), and self-efficacy (22.87 vs 25.20/30; p = .016) improved at two months post-counseling. Despite desiring provider-initiated SRH, wanting children (81 %), and perceiving the CF team as their primary care provider (97 %), 44 % report not receiving information about infertility by the CF team. CONCLUSIONS: Integrating FP counseling into CF care is feasible and acceptable to MwCF and can improve FP knowledge, self-efficacy, and care satisfaction. MwCF desire early and regular provider-initiated SRH education.

Psychological, social, and sexual challenges affecting men receiving male infertility treatment: a systematic review and implications for clinical care.

In recent years, social research surrounding the consequences of infertility has increasingly focused on the male perspective; however, a gap exists in the understanding of men's experiences of male infertility treatment. This review aims to synthesize the existing evidence concerning the psychological, social, and sexual burden of male infertility treatment on men, as well as patient needs during clinical care. A systematic search identified 12 studies that are diverse in design, setting, and methods. Psychological evaluations have found that urological surgery may have a lasting impact on infertility-specific stress, and treatment failure can lead to feelings of depression, grief, and inadequacy. Men tended to have an avoidant coping mechanism throughout fertility treatment, and their self-esteem, relationship quality, and sexual functions can be tied to outcomes of treatment. Partner bonds can be strengthened by mutual support and enhanced communication; couple separation, however, has been noted as a predominant reason for discontinuing male infertility treatment and may be associated with difficult circumstances surrounding severe male infertility. Surgical treatments can affect the sexual functioning of infertile men; however, the impact of testicular sperm extraction outcomes appears to be psychologically driven whereas the improvements after microsurgical varicocelectomy are only evident in hypogonadal men. Clinically, there is a need for better inclusion, communication, education, and resource provision, to address reported issues of marginalization and uncertainty in men. Routine psychosocial screening in cases of severe male infertility and follow-up in cases of surgical treatment failure are likely beneficial.

Study protocol for fertility preservation discussions and decisions: A family-centered psychoeducational intervention for male adolescents and emerging adults newly diagnosed with cancer and their families.

Many childhood cancer survivors desire biological children but are at risk for infertility after treatment. One option for mitigating risk is the use of fertility preservation prior to gonadotoxic therapy. Adolescents and emerging adults may rely on their parents to help them decide whether to use fertility preservation. While this is often a collaborative process, it is currently unknown how parents can optimally support adolescents and emerging adults through this decision. To address this gap, we developed a family-centered, psychoeducational intervention to prompt adolescents and emerging adults to reflect on their future parenthood goals and attitudes towards fertility preservation, as well as to prompt their parents (or other caregivers) to reflect on their own and their child's perspectives on the topic. In this randomized controlled trial, families will be randomized to either the standard of care control group (fertility consult) or the intervention group. After their fertility consult, adolescents and emerging adults and parents in the intervention group will complete a fertility preservation values clarification tool and then participate in a guided conversation about their responses and the fertility preservation decision. The primary expected outcome of this study is that participation in the intervention will increase the use of fertility preservation. The secondary expected outcome is an improvement in decision quality. Chi-square analyses and t-tests will evaluate primary and secondary outcomes. The goal of this intervention is to optimize family-centered fertility preservation decision-making in the context of a new cancer diagnosis to help male adolescents and emerging adults achieve their future parenthood goals.

Parent recommendation to bank sperm among at-risk adolescent and young adult males with cancer.

BACKGROUND: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) males newly diagnosed with cancer are often faced with making quick decisions about whether to cryopreserve ("bank") sperm prior to treatment initiation. Given that parental influence is crucial among young patients, the present study examines the prevalence of and factors associated with parent recommendation to bank sperm. PROCEDURE: Parents of 13- to 21-year-old males newly diagnosed with cancer and at risk for infertility secondary to impending gonadotoxic treatment completed questionnaires typically within one week of treatment initiation. Medical and sociodemographic data, communication factors, and psychological factors were considered in a logistic regression model of parent report of parental recommendation to bank sperm (yes/no). RESULTS: Surveys from 138 parents (70.3% female) of 117 AYA males (mean age = 16.1 years, SD = 2.0) were analyzed. Over half of parents recommended banking to their sons (N = 82; 59.4%). Parents who received a provider recommendation to bank sperm (odds ratio [OR] = 18.44, 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.20-81.01, P < 0.001) or who believed in the benefits of banking (OR = 1.22, 95% CI, 1.02-1.47, P = 0.03) were significantly more likely to recommend sperm banking. CONCLUSIONS: Given parents' role in influencing sperm banking outcomes, provider recommendation and promotion of banking benefits may influence parents and empower initiation of these sensitive discussions with their sons. Utilization of this approach should yield beneficial outcomes regardless of the banking decision.

Chronic unpredictable stress-induced reproductive deficits were prevented by probiotics.

Stress can induce reproductive deficits by activating the HPA and causing oxidative stress. Some studies have indicated that the neurologic diseases or disorders induced by stress could be relieved by probiotics. Whether chronic unpredictable stress (CUS)-induced reproductive deficits could be prevented by probiotics is unclear. The present experiment was designed to evaluate the effects of L. rhamnosus Gorbach-Goldin (LGG) on CUS-induced reproductive deficits. Kunming mice were divided into control, stress, and LGG groups randomly. The mice in stress and LGG groups were exposed to CUS for 40days, in the meantime, the mice in LGG group were orally administered with LGG suspension at a dose of 0.3 mL/mouse (1×1010 cells/mL), and the mice in control and stress groups were orally administered with volume-equivalent sterile saline once a day. The results showed that the CUS-induced the sperm deficits including the count, motility, morphology, ultrastructure, DNA integrity, and chromatin condensation were protected by oral administration of LGG. In addition, the change of testosterone level induced by CUS was prevented by up-regulating the expressions of StAR and P450scc in the testes. Moreover, LGG could increase the activities of catalase, glutathione peroxidase, and superoxide dismutase significantly, and decrease the levels of oxidative products malondialdehyde and protein carbonyls significantly, as well as the levels of cyclooxygenase 2, interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α, to block the CUS-induced inflammatory response and the oxidative stress. The results indicated that the CUS-induced male reproductive deficits could be prevented by oral administration of LGG.

Perceptions of participating in family-centered fertility research among adolescent and young adult males newly diagnosed with cancer: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Over half of male childhood cancer survivors experience infertility after treatment, which is known to cause distress and impact future quality of life. Sperm banking rates remain low, and little is known about how adolescent and young adult (AYA) males and their families make fertility preservation (FP) decisions. This study examined AYA and parent perceptions of participating in a research study focused on testing a new FP decision tool at the time of cancer diagnosis. METHODS: Forty-four participants (19 mothers, 11 fathers, 14 male AYAs 12-25 years old) from 20 families completed brief assessments at diagnosis and approximately one month later, including a qualitative interview exploring the impact of study participation. Verbatim transcripts were coded through thematic content analysis using the constant comparison method. RESULTS: Two major themes emerged: (1) a positive effect of participating in the study and (2) a neutral effect (no positive/negative effect of participation). Subthemes that emerged for participants who noted a positive effect included (a) participation prompted deeper thinking, (b) participation influenced family conversations, and (c) participation resulted in altruism/helping others. No participant reported a negative effect. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that participation in family-centered research focused on FP among AYA males, before treatment begins, is perceived as beneficial or neutral at the time of a new cancer diagnosis. These findings provide support for future family-centered FP interventions for this population.

Psychological Impacts of Male Sexual Dysfunction in Pelvic Cancer Survivorship.

INTRODUCTION: A common negative sequela of cancer treatment in men is sexual dysfunction, which can have a significant psychological impact and can contribute to feelings of depression, anxiety, and other mental health issues. Management of cancer survivors' psychological and mental well-being plays an important role in the treatment and recovery process. AIM: To identify how sexual dysfunction impacts the lives of male cancer survivors and to provide clinicians with treatment recommendations specific to this patient population. METHODS: A total of 51 peer-reviewed publications related to sexual dysfunction in male cancer survivors were selected for analysis. Sources were chosen based on relevance to current cancer therapies, causes and psychological impacts of sexual dysfunction, and treatment recommendations for clinicians caring for cancer survivors. PubMed search terms included "sexual dysfunction," "cancer survivorship," and "male cancer survivors." MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Measures of sexual dysfunction were based on cancer survivors reporting inadequate erectile capacity for penetrative sexual intercourse, decreased sensitivity of the genitalia, or inability to enjoy sex. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Sexual dysfunction was present in male cancer survivors from diverse ages, cancer diagnoses, and treatments of cancer. Many of the men surveyed presented with psychological distress resulting from their posttreatment sexual dysfunction. This had a significant negative impact on their sexual self-esteem, body image, and mental health. Sexual and social development was delayed in survivors of childhood cancer. Healthcare practitioners should initiate conversations with patients regarding the potential for sexual dysfunction at the time of cancer diagnosis and throughout treatment and follow-up. Physical symptoms of sexual dysfunction should be treated, whenever possible, using phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors or other interventions, and all cancer survivors presenting with psychological distress related to sexual dysfunction should be offered professional counseling. Twitchell DK, Wittmann DA, Hotaling JM, et al. Psychological Impacts of Male Sexual Dysfunction in Pelvic Cancer Survivorship. Sex Med Rev 2019;7:614-626.

Infertility-related distress following cancer for women and men: A mixed method study.

OBJECTIVE: Infertility-related distress is recognised to be a long-term effect of cancer. There have been attempts to examine predictors of such distress, but there is inconsistency in the findings. This study examined the psychological impact of infertility-related distress in women and men cancer survivors, across age group, parity, cancer type, time since diagnosis, and relationship context; and the association of distress with acceptance of illness and relationship satisfaction. METHODS: 693 women and 185 men completed a self-report survey examining infertility-related distress (fertility problem inventory [FPI], acceptance of cancer (acceptance of illness scale [AIS]), psychological distress (Kessler psychological distress scale [K10]), quality of life (QoL) (ladder of life), and relationship satisfaction relationship assessment scale [RAS]); 61 women and 17 men took part in one-to-one interviews to examine subjective experiences of infertility distress. RESULTS: Infertility distress was positively correlated with psychological distress and negatively correlated with QoL, relationship satisfaction, and acceptance of cancer across gender, cancer type and stage, relationship status, and age. Women reported significantly higher infertility distress than men. In multiple regression analysis, unique statistical predictors of infertility distress for women were childlessness, cancer acceptance, and QoL. Childlessness and relationship satisfaction were unique predictors for men. Thematic analysis of interviews identified loss and grief, identity threat, relationship concerns or support, and acceptance of cancer and infertility as key themes. CONCLUSIONS: Concern about cancer-related infertility is associated with decrements in psychological well-being and QoL, particularly for those without children. Psychological support to address cancer-related infertility distress should acknowledge the different meanings of infertility across gender, and the impact of acceptance of cancer and relationship satisfaction.

Masculinity, Mental Health, and Desire for Social Support Among Male Cancer and Infertility Patients.

By surveying men who are currently infertile ( N = 251) and men who are potentially infertile (i.e., men with cancer; N = 195), the mental health consequences of reproductive masculinity, or the cultural assumption that men are virile and should be fathers, were investigated. There was no difference in depression levels between these two groups when controlling for demographic variables, suggesting that both groups of men have similar mental health needs. Since gendered notions of masculinity also suggest that men do not want to discuss their fertility health, their desire for online fertility-related social support was assessed. These findings suggest that most men do want to talk to others about fertility, which indicates that there is a need for more fertility-related social support. This research challenges some conceptions regarding masculinity, as men revealed an interest in accessing online social support related to fertility.

[Impact of infertility-related psychological stress on the quality of life of azoospermia patients].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of infertility-related psychological stress (IRPS) on the quality of life (QOL) of azoospermia patients and the correlation between IRPS and QOL. METHODS: Using the Fertility Problem Inventory and Fertility-Related QOL (FertiQOL) questionnaire, we carried out a cross-sectional study among 503 azoospermia patients treated in our center from January to July 2017, all subjected to testicular biopsy for identification of the causes. We analyzed the IRPS and QOL of the patients and explored their correlation. RESULTS: The total score of the azoospermia patients for IRPS was 153.60 ± 27.21 and that for QOL was 64.22 ± 14.68. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that the main factors influencing the patients' QOL included IRPS ( ß = －0.298, P< 0.05), education ( ß = －0.093, P< 0.05), and age ( ß = 0.099, P< 0.05). Pearson correlation analysis revealed a negative correlation of the total QOL score with all the factors for IRPS (P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: IRPS is an important factor affecting azoospermia patients' QOL, the higher the IRPS, the worse the QOL. Therefore, sufficient attention and effective intervention measures are needed for the improvement of their QOL.

Patient factors associated with sperm cryopreservation among at-risk adolescents newly diagnosed with cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although survivors of adolescent-onset cancers are at risk of infertility, the majority desire children. Fertility preservation options are available for adolescents, but sperm banking remains underused. To the authors' knowledge, patient factors that influence decisions to bank sperm are poorly understood. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 146 adolescent males who were newly diagnosed with cancer and who completed surveys within 1 week of treatment initiation was performed. Participants, 65% of whom were white, were aged 13 to 21 years (mean, 16.49 years; standard deviation, 2.02 years) and were at risk of infertility secondary to impending gonadotoxic treatment. Participating institutions included 8 leading pediatric oncology centers across the United States and Canada. RESULTS: Of the patients approached, approximately 80.6% participated. Parent recommendation to bank (odds ratio [OR], 4.88; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.15-20.71 [P = .03]), higher Tanner stage (OR, 4.25; 95% CI, 1.60-11.27 [P < .01]), greater perceived benefits (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.12-1.77 [P < .01]), and lower social barriers to banking (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.81-0.96 [P < .01]) were found to be associated with adolescent collection attempts, whereas meeting with a fertility specialist (OR, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.00-11.83 [P = .05]), parent (OR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.12-8.10 [P = .03]) or provider (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.05-6.77 [P = .04]) recommendation to bank, and greater adolescent self-efficacy to bank (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.33 [P = .03]) were found to be associated with successful sperm banking. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents' perceived benefits of sperm banking, higher Tanner stage, and parent recommendation were associated with collection attempts, whereas perceived social barriers decreased this likelihood. Successful banking was associated with greater adolescent self-efficacy, parent and provider recommendation to bank, and consultation with a fertility specialist. Providers should consult with both adolescents and parents regarding fertility preservation, and interventions should be tailored to address barriers to sperm banking while promoting its benefits.

Major depression, antidepressant use, and male and female fertility.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if maternal major depression (MD), antidepressant use, or paternal MD are associated with pregnancy outcomes after non-IVF fertility treatments. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Clinics. PATIENT(S): Participants in two randomized trials: PPCOS II (clomiphene citrate versus letrozole for polycystic ovary syndrome), and AMIGOS (gonadotropins versus clomiphene citrate versus letrozole for unexplained infertility). INTERVENTION(S): Female and male partners completed the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Female medication use was collected. PHQ-9 score ≥10 was used to define currently active MD. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary outcome: live birth. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: pregnancy, first-trimester miscarriage. Poisson regression models were used to determine relative risks after adjusting for age, race, income, months trying to conceive, smoking, and study (PPCOS II versus AMIGOS). RESULT(S): Data for 1,650 women and 1,608 men were included. Among women not using an antidepressant, the presence of currently active MD was not associated with poorer fertility outcomes (live birth, miscarriage), but rather was associated with a slightly increased likelihood of pregnancy. Maternal antidepressant use (n = 90) was associated with increased risk of miscarriage, and male partners with currently active MD were less likely to achieve conception. CONCLUSION(S): Currently active MD in the female partner does not negatively affect non-IVF treatment outcomes; however, currently active MD in the male partner may lower the likelihood of pregnancy. Maternal antidepressant use is associated with first-trimester pregnancy loss, which may depend upon the type of antidepressant. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT00719186 and NCT01044862.

GnRH Neurons on LSD: A Year of Rejecting Hypotheses That May Have Made Karl Popper Proud.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neurons are critical to many aspects of fertility regulation, from producing episodic release critical to both sexes, to providing a central signal to induce the ovulatory cascade in females. This year saw progress through the rejection, and occasional support, of hypotheses in understanding how GnRH neurons contribute to these processes. This brief review provides one laboratory's view of new insights into possible roles for these cells in development, adult reproductive function, and what may go wrong with GnRH neurons in some cases of infertility.

Homens que vivenciam a infertilidade: clientes da "cegonha tecnológica" / Men who experiences infertility: clients of "stork technological" / Hombres que experimentan la infertilidad: clientes de la "cigueña tecnologica"

A presente pesquisa teve como objetivo compreender a experiência de homens inférteis, os quais participam de um serviço de Reprodução Assistida. De natureza qualitativa, esta investigação está afinada à perspectiva fenomenológica hermenêutica, privilegiando a compreensão interpretativa fundada na Hermenêutica Filosófica, proposta elaborada por Gadamer. Para acesso à experiência utilizaram-se a entrevista narrativa e os registros feitos no "diário de bordo" das pesquisadoras, a partir da sua inserção no lócus da pesquisa. Os relatos dos colaboradores apontaram para dificuldades vividas durante a tentativa de métodos de Reprodução Assistida, as quais levaram a experiências de desconforto, estranheza, bem como de desesperança frente à burocracia e morosidade dos serviços prestados no hospital. Os interlocutores narraram sua vivência frente aos procedimentos técnicos/médicos, desvelando de um lado a utilidade da técnica no projeto parental e, de outro, o seu domínio na hegemonia do discurso científico e na compreensão do corpo masculino como matéria-prima a ser explorada e aperfeiçoada.

This research aimed to understand the experience of infertile men, who participate in a Assisted Reproduction Service. Qualitative, this research is in tune to the hermeneutic phenomenological perspective, focusing on interpretive understanding founded in Philosophical Hermeneutics, proposal made by Gadamer. For access to the experience we used the narrative interviews and the records made in the "logbook" of the researchers, from its insertion into the locus of research. The accounts of the employees pointed to difficulties experienced while trying to assisted reproduction methods, which led to discomfort experiences, strangeness, and of hopelessness against the bureaucracy and slowness of services in the hospital. The interlocutors narrated his experience forward to the technical /medical procedures, unveiling the one hand the technical usefulness of the parental project and on the other, its dominance in the hegemony of scientific discourse and understanding of the male body as a raw material to be exploited and improved.

Esta investigación tuvo como objetivo comprender la experiencia de los hombres infértiles, que participan en un Servicio de Reproducción Asistida. Cualitativa, esta investigación está en sintonía con la perspectiva fenomenológica hermenéutica, centrándose en la comprensión interpretativa fundada en la hermenéutica filosófica, propuesta hecha por Gadamer. Para el acceso a la experiencia se utilizaron las entrevistas narrativas y los registros realizados en el "cuaderno de bitácora" de los investigadores, a partir de su inserción en el locus de la investigación. Las cuentas de los empleados señalaron las dificultades experimentadas al tratar de los métodos de reproducción asistida, lo que llevó a la incomodidad experiencias, extrañeza, y de desesperanza contra la burocracia y la lentitud de los servicios en el hospital. Los interlocutores narran su experiencia con interés los procedimientos técnicos /medicina, revelando un lado la utilidad técnica del proyecto de los padres y por el otro, su dominio en la hegemonía del discurso científico y la comprensión del cuerpo masculino como materia prima para ser explotados y mejorado.

Ethical Barriers in Adolescent Oncofertility Counseling.

Adult survivors of pediatric cancers are at substantial risk for infertility. Oncofertility is an emerging field in medicine that has focused on the fertility preservation of these patients. As the field continues to develop, there are several areas in which our practice has improved. However, several ethical concerns still exist involving beneficence, nonmaleficence, informed consent, adolescent assent, and posthumous use of reproductive tissues. Because the field is still developing, great disparities exist in available options depending on age, ability to pay, and geographic location. Such discrepancies in access may lead to health disparities in the adolescent patient population. As the science continues to make future fertility more feasible, the ethical questions will continue to be more complex. The purpose of this article is to review some of the developments regarding oncoferility and address future directions for research and inquiry in specific areas.

Effects of medical causes, role concepts and treatment stages on quality of life in involuntary childless men.

Goal of this study was to investigate differences in quality of life in men contingent upon various fertility treatment stages, infertility causes and adoption of roles. A quantitative study with n = 115 men in three German fertility centres was devised. Participants completed a standardised, fertility-specific questionnaire devised for men (TLMK), sociodemographic and role items. Men having experienced severe medical conditions, for example cancer, reported significant higher quality of life compared to men with other infertility reasons [F(1,56) = 12.77, P = 0.001]. Furthermore, allocating participants into distinctive groups by means of kind and duration of treatment revealed significant group differences [F(2,111) = 4.94, P = 0.009], with quality of life decreasing with the use of more invasive fertility methods. A higher satisfaction with life was also stated by men adopting many tasks in the treatment process. The high quality of life displayed by men having experienced severe medical conditions contains valuable and far-reaching information about possible resilience factors that need to be researched more in detail. The finding of decreasing quality of life in men with the use of more invasive methods in treatment applies for increased psychosocial services in fertility clinics.

Gender and Sexual Health: Infertility.

Infertility is common in the United States, with up to 15% of heterosexual couples experiencing difficulty in achieving conception. Family physicians often are the first physicians to evaluate couples attempting to conceive. Evaluation begins with assessment of ovulation, evaluation of anatomic abnormalities, and semen analysis. Many etiologies of anovulation can be managed by family physicians, and clinicians can offer counseling on timing of intercourse and assist patients with lifestyle changes to promote fertility. Ovulation induction for women with polycystic ovary syndrome and treatment of hypothyroidism also can be managed in the family physician's office. For couples who are referred to a reproductive endocrinology subspecialist, clinicians can provide emotional support, screen for depression and anxiety, and provide education about procedures and behaviors that can affect success rates.

Limitations and barriers in access to care for male factor infertility.

The primary challenge to identifying and addressing barriers in access to care for male factor infertility is accurate measurement of the prevalence of male infertility. Current estimates are based on couples pursuing assisted reproduction, and likely underestimate the problem. These estimates also fail to account for the number of patients facing infertility due to cancer or cancer treatment. Lack of health insurance coverage for the diagnosis and treatment of infertility presents a major barrier for couples struggling with infertility. However, it is not the only barrier. Education level, household income, cultural norms, religious beliefs, geographic location, and the availability of specialty-trained reproductive urologists are all important factors in determining the ease with which patients access and obtain infertility care. Addressing each of these obstacles directly is imperative to improving reproductive care and outcomes for infertile couples in the United States.