Serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors in managing neuropathic pain following spinal and non-spinal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: While serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) offer promise in managing Post-surgical neuropathic pain (PSNP), uncertainties remain. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and adverse events of SNRIs in managing PSNP. METHODS: Systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to January 1st 2023 identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SNRIs to placebo for PSNP. The primary outcome measures were pain at rest and adverse events post-surgery. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on surgical type and specific SNRIs. RESULTS: A total of 19 RCTs, encompassing 1440 participants (719 in the SNRI group vs 721 in the placebo group), met the inclusion criteria and were included. The pooled results demonstrated that pain scores were significantly lower in patients treated with SNRIs at 2 hours (MD:-0.26; 95%CI: -0.47 to -0.04; p=0.02), 6 hours (MD:-0.68; 95%CI: -1.01 to -0.34; p<0.0001), 24 hours (MD:-0.54; 95%CI: -0.99 to -0.09; p=0.02), and 48 hours (MD:-0.66; 95%CI: -1.23 to -0.10; p=0.02) post-surgery. In terms of adverse events, dizziness (OR:2.53; 95%CI: 1.34-4.78; p=0.004) and dry mouth (OR:2.21; 95%CI: 1.25-3.92; p=0.007) were significantly higher in the SNRIs group. Subgroup analysis showed that SNRI was found to significantly lower the 24-hour pain score after spinal surgery (MD:-0.45; 95%CI: -0.84 to -0.05; p=0.03). Duloxetine (MD:-0.63; 95%CI: -1.15 to -0.11; p=0.02) had a significant effect in lowering the 24-hour pain score at rest compared to placebo, whereas venlafaxine did not. CONCLUSIONS: SNRIs yielded considerable pain score reductions across multiple post-surgical intervals, although accompanied by an increased incidence of dizziness and dry mouth.

How to treat chronic pain in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) - A pharmacological review.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic pain is a common symptom of rheumatic diseases that impacts patients' quality of life. While non-pharmacological approaches are often recommended as first-line treatments, pharmacological interventions are important for pain management. However, the effectiveness and safety of different pharmacological treatments for chronic pain in rheumatic diseases are unclear. METHODS: This review critically synthesizes the current evidence base to guide clinicians in selecting appropriate pharmacological treatments for their patients, considering the expected benefits and potential risks and side effects. RESULTS: For osteoarthritis, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, opioids, and antidepressants are commonly used, with NSAIDs being the most recommended. In addition, topical agents, such as topical NSAIDs, are recommended for localized pain relief. For fibromyalgia, amitriptyline, serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), and gabapentinoids are commonly used, with SNRIs being the most recommended. For back pain, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, opioids are used only for acute of flare-up pain, whereas neuropathic pain drugs are only used for chronic radicular pain. For inflammatory rheumatic diseases, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biological agents are recommended to slow disease progression and manage symptoms. CONCLUSION: While DMARDs and biological agents are recommended for inflammatory rheumatic diseases, pharmacological treatments for other rheumatic diseases only alleviate symptoms and do not provide a cure for the underlying condition. The use of pharmacological treatments should be based on the expected benefits and evaluation of side effects, with non-pharmacological modalities also being considered, especially for fibromyalgia.

Concurrent administration of serotonergic antidepressants and ozanimod in participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis from the open-label extension DAYBREAK trial.

BACKGROUND: Monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors can interact with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)/serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). There is clinical interest surrounding use of ozanimod with SSRIs/SNRIs because the major metabolites of ozanimod are weak inhibitors of MAO-B in vitro. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) potentially related to serotonin accumulation (SA) during concomitant ozanimod and SSRI/SNRI use by performing analyses of data from an open-label, oral ozanimod 0.92 mg trial (DAYBREAK; NCT02576717). METHODS: SA narrow (serotonin syndrome, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, and hyperthermia malignant) and broad (terms potentially associated with SA) MedDRA v24.0 searches were performed using TEAE data from participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis who entered DAYBREAK from phase 3 studies (cutoff February 1, 2022). Incidences of TEAEs matching terms from each search were stratified by SSRI/SNRI use. RESULTS: Of 2257 DAYBREAK participants, 274 (12.1%) used an SSRI/SNRI. No participants had TEAEs matching the SA narrow search terms. There was no significant difference in the percentage of participants with ⩾1 TEAE matching the SA broad search for those on versus off SSRIs/SNRIs (on: 12.4%, n = 34/274; off: 15.6%, n = 310/1982, nominal p = 0.1630). CONCLUSION: MedDRA searches showed no increase in TEAEs potentially associated with SA with concomitant SSRI/SNRI and ozanimod use.

Secular Trends in Central Nervous System-Active Polypharmacy Among Serial Cross-Sections of US Adults, 2009-2020.

BACKGROUND: Data comprehensively examining trends in central nervous system (CNS)-active polypharmacy are limited. The objective of this cross-sectional study was to characterize the composition of and trends in CNS-active medication use in US adults. METHODS: We included all participants ≥ 18 years old in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Study (NHANES), 2009-2020. The primary outcome was the percent of adults with CNS-active polypharmacy. This was defined as ≥ 3 medications among antidepressants [tricyclic, selective and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs and SNRIs), opioids, antiepileptics, antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, and nonbenzodiazepine receptor agonists ("Z-drugs")]. Secondary outcomes included prevalence of any CNS-active medication and specific medications and classes over time, and their indications. Percentages were weighted according to NHANES's nationally representative sampling frame. log binomial regressions evaluated the relative risk (RR) for each outcome, comparing the last (2017-2020) versus the first (2010-2011) survey cycle. RESULTS: We included 34,189 adults (18.8% at least 65 years old) from five serial cross-sections (survey cycles). The prevalence of CNS-active polypharmacy was 2.1% in 2009-2010 and 2.6% in 2017-2020 [RR 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94-1.47]. The prevalence of CNS-active polypharmacy did not significantly change within any specific age group (e.g., age at least 65 years: RR 1.29, CI 0.74-2.24). The prevalence of any CNS-active medication was 21.0% in 2009 and 24.6% in 2017-2020 (RR] 1.12, 95% CI 1.02-1.25). A substantial increase occurred for antiepileptics (5.1-8.3%), specifically among participants aged 65 years and older (8.3-13.7%). This was largely driven by increasing gabapentin prevalence (1.4-3.6% overall; 3.3-7.9% age 65 years and older). Anticholinergic, SSRIs/SNRIs, antiepileptics, and benzodiazepines were elevated in most cycles for participants at least 65 years old compared with participants less than 65 years, and opioid use was increased in several cycles for older participants as well. Alprazolam was the most common benzodiazepine and third most common medication for anxiety/depression. Gabapentin was the most common CNS-active medication (3.6% of all participants in 2017-2020), followed by sertraline, citalopram, and acetaminophen-hydrocodone (each ~2%). The most common categories were antidepressants (13.7% in 2017-2020), followed by opioids (5.1% in 2017-2020). CONCLUSIONS: CNS-active medications are increasingly common, particularly gabapentin, and use of any CNS-active medication increased by 12%. Numerous CNS-active classes also increased in older adults throughout the years. Increasing suboptimal medication use highlight the need for further investigation into causes for potentially inappropriate prescribing, particularly for older adults.

Comparative safety of adding serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) versus nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to short-acting opioids for non-malignant pain in nursing homes.

BACKGROUND: The comparative safety of serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) as adjuvants to short-acting opioids in older adults is unknown even though SNRIs are commonly used. We compared the effects of SNRIs versus nonsteroidal anti-Inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on delirium among nursing home residents when SNRIs or NSAIDs were added to stable regimens of short-acting opioids. METHODS: Using 2011-2016 national Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 and Medicare claims data to implement a new-user design, we identified a cohort of nursing home residents receiving short-acting opioids who initiated either an SNRI or an NSAID. Delirium was defined from the Confusion Assessment Method in MDS 3.0 assessments and ICD9/10 codes using Medicare hospitalization claims. Propensity score matching balanced underlying differences for initiating treatments on 39 demographic and clinical characteristics (nSNRIs = 5350; nNSAIDs = 5350). Fine and Gray models provided hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) adjusting for the competing risk of death. RESULTS: Hydrocodone was the most commonly used short-acting opioid (48%). Residents received ~23 mg daily oral morphine equivalent at the time of SNRIs/NSAIDs initiation. The majority were women, non-Hispanic White, and aged ≥75 years. There were no differences in any of the confounders after propensity matching. Over 1 year, 10.8% of SNRIs initiators and 8.9% of NSAIDs initiators developed delirium. The rate of delirium onset was similar in SNRIs and NSAID initiators (HR(delirium in nursing home or hospitalization for delirium):1.10; 95% CI: 0.97-1.24; HR(hospitalization for delirium): 1.06; 95% CI: 0.89-1.25), and were similar regardless of baseline opioid daily dosage. CONCLUSIONS: Among nursing home residents, adding SNRIs to short-acting opioids does not appear to increase risk of delirium relative to initiating NSAIDs. Understanding the comparative safety of pain regimens is needed to inform clinical decisions in a medically complex population often excluded from clinical research.

NITROSOGENESIS OF SKIN CANCER: THE NITROSAMINE CONTAMINATION IN THE CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS (AMLODIPINE), BETA BLOCKERS (BISOPROLOL), SARTANS (VALSARTAN/LOSARTAN), ACE INHIBITORS (PERINDOPRIL/ENALAPRIL), TRICYCLIC ANTIDEPRESSANTS (MELITRACEN), SSRIS (PAROXETINE), SNRIS (VENLAFAXINE) AND METFORMIN: THE MOST PROBABLE EXPLANATION FOR THE RISING SKIN CANCER INCIDENCE.

The Nitrosogenesis of skin cancer is a newly introduced concept in medical science, the significance of which is yet to be the subject of detailed analyses and discussions. Contamination of the most commonly used drugs for systemic treatment worldwide (such as Angiotensin receptor II blockers/ARBs, ACE inhibitors, Beta blockers, Thiazide diuretics, Metformin, Ranitidine, Nizatidine, tricyclic antidepressants, anticoagulants/dabigatran, Rifampicin, calcium channel blockers, SSRIs/ selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, Varenicline) is already a fact and is more than worrying but also indicative. It is "this relationship" that has been repeatedly described in the medical literature (initially) as an association, and subsequently now increasingly as a causal relationship, a pathogenetic relationship. Observational data from clinicians over the past year increasingly speak in favour of a pathogenetic link and associate every single drug declared as contaminated with the development of heterogeneous forms of skin cancer gradually and surely. New drugs are added monthly that have not yet been declared as actually/potentially contaminated but are probably known to regulatory authorities or are in the process of being clarified. In parallel, the number of nitrosamines identified as contaminants in medicines is growing. This should not be surprising to anyone: ˝You take 3 drugs contaminated with mutagens- you subsequently develop skin cancer˝. Polymorbidity and multimedication against the background of polycontamination with nitrosamines appears to be the most serious problem at present. While until recently polymorbidity was considered to be a key factor in carcinogenesis (generator, trigger, inducer), today this dogma should be re-examined or looked at from another, radically different angle: from the angle of polycontamination to multimedication within polymorbidity. It is this that could provide a good explanation for the pandemic concerning skin cancer, for example. The development of relatively identical patterns of manifestation of skin tumors after concomitant intake of drugs declared as contaminated (drugs from the classes already mentioned above/ with radically different mechanism of action) supports unequivocally the thesis that: the nitrosogenesis of skin cancer is an undeniable fact that should be studied in detail. Studied because it could be eliminated. The analysis presented within this scientific thesis concerns 4 polymorbid patients who developed skin tumors within the framework of the multimedication they were assigned. The concomitant intake of medications declared as contaminated (in the presented patients) led to the manifestation of single or multiple skin neoplasms that were successfully treated surgically. Once again, the importance of potential/actual contamination of beta blockers, ACE inhibitors, oral antidiabetic drugs, and sartans in the generation of 1) non-melanocytic forms of skin cancer, and 2) melanoma precursor lesions or so-called dysplastic moles is established and validated. The possible contamination with nitrosamines of 1) other types of tricyclic antidepressant- Melitracen; 2) antidepressant of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) class: Paroxetine; 3) antidepressant of the serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRIs) class: Venlafaxine, as well as of the systemic anticoagulant: apixaban is highlighted for the first time in the world literature.

Antidepressant Use and Lung Cancer Risk and Survival: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies.

Recent preclinical studies have linked antidepressants (AD) to their potential anticancer effects in multiple cancers, but the impact on lung cancer remains unclear. This meta-analysis examined the associations between ADs and lung cancer incidence and survival. The Web of Science, Medline, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases were searched to identify eligible studies published by June 2022. We conducted a meta-analysis using a random-effects model to compare the pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) in those treated with or without ADs. Heterogeneity was examined using Cochran Q test and inconsistency I2 statistics. The methodologic quality of the selected studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. Our analysis, including 11 publications involving 1,200,885 participants, showed that AD use increased lung cancer risk by 11% (RR = 1.11; 95% CI = 1.02-1.20; I2 = 65.03%; n = 6) but was not associated with overall survival (RR = 1.04; 95% CI = 0.75-1.45; I2 = 83.40%; n = 4). One study examined cancer-specific survival. Subgroup analysis showed that serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) were associated with an increased lung cancer risk by 38% (RR = 1.38; 95% CI = 1.07-1.78; n = 2). The quality of selected studies was good (n = 5) to fair (n = 6). Our data analysis suggests that SNRIs were associated with an elevated risk of lung cancer, raising concerns regarding the use of AD treatment in patients vulnerable to lung cancer. The effects of ADs-particularly SNRIs-and their interplay with cigarette use and lung cancer risk in vulnerable patients merits further study. Significance: In this meta-analysis of 11 observational studies, we found evidence of a statistically significant association between the use of certain ADs and lung cancer risk. This effect merits further study, particularly as it relates to known environmental and behavioral drivers of lung cancer risk, such as air pollution and cigarette smoke.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of antidepressants for pain in adults: overview of systematic reviews.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a comprehensive overview of the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of antidepressants for pain according to condition. DESIGN: Overview of systematic reviews. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to 20 June 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Systematic reviews comparing any antidepressant with placebo for any pain condition in adults. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data. The main outcome measure was pain; for headache disorders it was frequency of headaches. Continuous pain outcomes were converted into a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain) and were presented as mean differences (95% confidence intervals). Dichotomous outcomes were presented as risk ratios (95% confidence intervals). Data were extracted from the time point closest to the end of treatment. When end of treatment was too variable across trials in a review, data were extracted from the outcome or time point with the largest number of trials and participants. Secondary outcomes were safety and tolerability (withdrawals because of adverse events). Findings were classified from each comparison as efficacious, not efficacious, or inconclusive. Certainty of evidence was assessed with the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation framework. RESULTS: 26 reviews (156 unique trials and >25 000 participants) were included. These reviews reported on the efficacy of eight antidepressant classes covering 22 pain conditions (42 distinct comparisons). No review provided high certainty evidence on the efficacy of antidepressants for pain for any condition. 11 comparisons (nine conditions) were found where antidepressants were efficacious, four with moderate certainty evidence: serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) for back pain (mean difference -5.3, 95% confidence interval -7.3 to -3.3), postoperative pain (-7.3, -12.9 to -1.7), neuropathic pain (-6.8, -8.7 to -4.8), and fibromyalgia (risk ratio 1.4, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 1.6). For the other 31 comparisons, antidepressants were either not efficacious (five comparisons) or the evidence was inconclusive (26 comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of efficacy of antidepressants was found in 11 of the 42 comparisons included in this overview of systematic reviews-seven of the 11 comparisons investigated the efficacy of SNRIs. For the other 31 comparisons, antidepressants were either inefficacious or evidence on efficacy was inconclusive. The findings suggest that a more nuanced approach is needed when prescribing antidepressants for pain conditions. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022311073.

Frequency, risk factors, and impacts on quality of life of the restless legs syndrome and side effects among antidepressant users in a tertiary hospital: an observational cross-sectional study.

Restless leg syndrome (RLS) is a common but underestimated sensorimotor disorder that significantly affects the quality of life (QoL) which can be induced by antidepressants. This study aims to investigate the frequency and potential risk factors of RLS and side effects in selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors/serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SSRI/SNRI) users. This cross-sectional study included 198 outpatients who received SSRI/SNRI for 4-8 weeks. Clinical evaluation was performed using the International Restless Leg Syndrome Study Group rating scale for RLS, Udvalg for Kliniske Undersøgelser side effects rating scale, and a short form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire for QoL. The frequency of RLS was 25%. RLS significantly increased with smoking and habituality. Also, habituality increased neurologic side effects reporting. The use of antipsychotics and calcium channel blockers decreased reporting of autonomic side effects. QoL decreased with RLS, psychiatric, neurologic, autonomic, and other side effects in different domains of SF-36. These findings suggested that SSRI/SNRI use could be associated with a higher risk of RLS, especially in smokers. QoL could be influenced negatively by RLS and all side effects. However, further prospective studies are needed to confirm these associations in large samples.

Predictors of treatment response to serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors in fibromyalgia.

INTRODUCTION: Fibromyalgia (FM) is often comorbid with anxiety and depression. Serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are used in the treatment of FM, depression, and anxiety, but they are ineffective in a substantial number of patients. Recently, it has been reported that FM is associated with impaired glucose metabolism. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to explore the associations between insulin resistance, psychiatric comorbidities, and treatment response to SNRIs in patients with FM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 59 patients with FM and 30 healthy controls (HCs) were recruited. The study patients were classified as treatment­nonresponsive if the SNRI treatment resulted in a reduction in reported pain by less than 30%. All participants were examined by a physician and completed self­report questionnaires. Blood samples were drawn to assess fasting glucose and insulin levels and to calculate the Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA­IR) values. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to analyze the associations between insulin resistance, psychiatric comorbidies, and the lack of response to treatment with SNRIs. RESULTS: The SNRI nonresponders (FM [T-]) had higher body mass index (BMI), fasting insulin level, and HOMA­IR values than the responders (FM [T+]) and HCs. The FM [T+] patients did not significantly differ from HCs in terms of BMI, levels of fasting glucose and fasting insulin, and HOMA­IR values. Depression, anxiety, and personality disorders were significantly more prevalent in the FM [T-] than in the FM [T+] group. Insulin resistance, depression, anxiety, and personality disorders were identified as the predictors of nonresponse to SNRI treatment. The effect of BMI on the lack of response to SNRIs was fully mediated by insulin resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Increased values of certain clinical and metabolic parameters (BMI, fasting glucose, fasting insulin, HOMA­IR) as well as the presence of psychiatric comorbidities could affect the response to treatment with SNRIs in the patients with FM.

Can selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors/serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor antidepressants decrease the "cytokine storm" in the course of COVID-19 pneumonia?

BACKGROUND: Lots of research has been conducted to fight COVID-19 since the outbreak of the pandemic in 2020. The role of "cytokine storm" in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 pneumonia is well known. Relationship between interleukins and depression is still subject matter of the research, but a correlation between interleukin-6 and depressive disorders is proven by now. The aim of this study is to verify differences among interleukin-6 blood levels of inpatients treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and/or serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor before and during hospitalization and of inpatients not treated with these drugs. METHODS: This is an observational study performed during the first wave of SARS Cov-2 pandemic in Italy for three months. The hospitalized patients of Internal Medicine wards and Infectious and Tropical Diseases ward of Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi of Florence for COVID-19 pneumonia have been divided into two subgroups (treated / not treated with antidepressants). Patients admitted to Intensive Care Unit previously have been excluded. Each patient has been evaluated concerning demographic, clinical and therapeutic features. The first dosage of interleukin-6 detected during hospitalization has been noticed. RESULTS: The entire sample included 402 patients and 8.5% (N.=34) had been treated with an antidepressant of the two considered categories before admission until discharge from hospital. Significant lower levels of interleukin-6 of recovered patients of the treated subgroup have been highlighted as compared to recovered patients of not-treated subgroup (12.1 vs. 25.4 P<0.001). These results have been pointed out in spite of higher mean age and more serious comorbidities of the treated subgroup. Nevertheless, the incidence of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome is significantly lower in the subgroup of patients with antidepressant treatment (20.6% vs. 43.2% P<0.02) as well as endotracheal intubation employment (0.0% vs. 11.7% P<0.04). The rate of deceased patients of treated-subgroup is not significantly lower than the rate of not-treated subgroup (23.5% vs. 26.4% P=0.13). CONCLUSIONS: During COVID-19 pneumonia, the production of interleukin-6 seems to be modulated in presence of antidepressant therapy. Further proofs and broader surveys are necessary.

Bipolar Spectrum Symptoms in Patients with Fibromyalgia: A Dimensional Psychometric Evaluation of 120 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS) is characterized by chronic widespread pain, fatigue, unrefreshing sleep and cognitive dysfunction. Depressive and manic symptoms are often reported in FMS patients' history. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of bipolar spectrum symptoms (BSS) and to correlate these with quality of life (QoL) scores and antidepressant treatment. METHODS: From October 2017 to July 2018, a battery of QoL questionnaires (FIQ, PSQI and SF-12) was administered to 120 FMS patients after a clinical examination. The MOODS-SR lifetime questionnaire was then remotely administered to the patients included in the study. RESULTS: The presence of depressive and manic lifetime symptoms was found, in line with the results of the available literature. A correlation was found between the history of depressive symptoms and the severity of FIQ and SF-12 scores. Despite a low statistical strength, a trend toward a correlation between a history of manic symptoms and SNRI treatment was detected. CONCLUSIONS: The correlation between the MOOD-depressive domains and poor QoL is in line with the available literature. Further studies are needed to corroborate these findings and to elucidate the relationship between manic symptoms and SNRI treatment.

Antidepressant exposures associated with exploratory behavior among young children reported to United States poison control centers, 2000-2020.

PURPOSE: This study investigates characteristics and trends of antidepressant exposures among children <6 years old related to exploratory behavior reported to US poison control centers. METHODS: Using data from the National Poison Data System for 2000-2020, population-based annual exposure rates by sex, antidepressant category, serious medical outcome, and health care facility admission were analyzed and odds ratios to assess associations of exposure type and antidepressant category with medical outcome and admission were calculated. RESULTS: There were 215 909 first-ranked unintentional exploratory exposures involving antidepressants among children <6 years old during the study period, averaging 10 281 annually. Most cases were <3 years old (77.8%), involved a single substance (86.9%), and did not receive treatment at a health care facility (57.6%); however, 7.9% were admitted and 3.4% had serious medical outcomes, including 13 deaths. SSRIs were involved in 56.9% of all cases. Compared with SSRIs, bupropion (OR: 5.22, 95% CI: 4.68-5.82), TCAs (OR: 3.74, 95% CI: 3.44-4.07), SNRIs (OR: 2.39, 95% CI: 2.11-2.71), and lithium salts (OR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.63-2.46) were more likely to be associated with a serious medical outcome. TCAs were the first-ranked substance in 7 of the 13 deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Although most unintentional antidepressant exposures related to pediatric exploratory behavior were inconsequential, an important minority of cases required admission to a HCF or had a serious medical outcome, including 13 deaths. Therefore, increased efforts to prevent these exposures among young children are needed, including public education and improved medication packaging.

Duloxetine ameliorates lipopolysaccharide-induced microglial activation by suppressing iNOS expression in BV-2 microglial cells.

RATIONALE: It is known that both selective serotonin and serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SSRI, SNRI) are first-line drugs for the treatment of major depressive disorder. It has also been considered that both SSRI and SNRI can improve the symptoms of major depressive disorder by increasing the concentration of monoamine in the synaptic cleft based on the monoamine hypothesis. However, accumulating evidence has indicated that inflammation in the brain may be a key factor in the pathophysiological mechanisms that underlie the development of major depressive disorder. OBJECTIVES: It has been advocated that microglial cells may regulate the inflammatory response under pathological conditions such as major depressive disorder. In this study, we focused on whether duloxetine can ameliorate the inflammatory response induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in BV-2 microglial cells. RESULTS: Our results indicated that duloxetine significantly decreased the NO production induced by LPS. The increase in the protein expression level of iNOS induced by LPS was significantly decreased by treatment with duloxetine. Moreover, the increases in the protein expression levels of phosphorylated-IκBα, phosphorylated-Akt and Akt induced by LPS were also significantly decreased. Unexpectedly, the protein expression levels of other pro-inflammatory factors such as COX-2 and the phosphorylation ratios for various molecules including IκBα and Akt were not changed by treatment with duloxetine. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that duloxetine may have an anti-inflammatory effect, which could contribute to its therapeutic effectiveness for major depressive disorder.

Pharmacotherapy for Spine-Related Pain in Older Adults.

As the population ages, spine-related pain is increasingly common in older adults. While medications play an important role in pain management, their use has limitations in geriatric patients due to reduced liver and renal function, comorbid medical problems, and polypharmacy. This review will assess the evidence basis for medications used for spine-related pain in older adults, with a focus on drug metabolism and adverse drug reactions. A PubMed/OVID search crossing common spine, neck, and back pain terms with key words for older adults and geriatrics was combined with common drug classes and common drug names and limited to clinical trials and age over 65 years. The results were then reviewed with identification of commonly used drugs and drug categories: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, corticosteroids, gabapentin and pregabalin, antispastic and antispasmodic muscle relaxants, tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), tramadol, and opioids. Collectively, 138 double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were the focus of the review. The review found a variable contribution of high-quality studies examining the efficacy of medications for spine pain primarily in the geriatric population. There was strong evidence for NSAID use with adjustments for gastrointestinal and renal risk factors. Gabapentin and pregabalin had mixed evidence for neuropathic pain. SNRIs had good evidence for neuropathic pain and a more favorable safety profile than TCAs. Tramadol had some evidence in older patients, but more so in persons aged < 65 years. Rational therapeutic choices based on geriatric spine pain diagnosis are helpful, such as NSAIDs and acetaminophen for arthritic and myofascial-based pain, gabapentinoids or duloxetine for neuropathic and radicular pain, antispastic agents for myofascial-based pain, and combination therapy for mixed etiologies. Tramadol can be well tolerated in older patients, but has risks of cognitive and classic opioid side effects. Otherwise, opioids are typically avoided in the treatment of spine-related pain in older adults due to their morbidity and mortality risk and are reserved for refractory severe pain. Whenever possible, beneficial geriatric spine pain pharmacotherapy should employ the lowest therapeutic doses with consideration of polypharmacy, potentially decreased renal and hepatic metabolism, and co-morbid medical disorders.

Acetaminophen (paracetamol) is safe in older adults, but non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (e.g. ibuprofen) may be more effective for spine-related pain. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatories should be used in short-term lower dose courses with gastrointestinal precaution. Corticosteroids have the least evidence for treating nonspecific back pain. Gabapentin and pregabalin may cause dizziness or difficulty walking, but may have some benefit for neck and back nerve pain (e.g. sciatica) in older adults. They should be used in lower doses with smaller dose adjustments. Some muscle relaxants (carisoprodol, chlorzoxazone, cyclobenzaprine, metaxalone, methocarbamol, and orphenadrine) are avoided in older adults due to risk for sedation and falls. Others (tizanidine, baclofen, dantrolene) may be helpful for neck and back pain, with the most evidence for tizanidine and baclofen. These should be used in reduced doses, avoiding tizanidine with liver disease and reducing baclofen dosing with kidney disease. Older antidepressants are typically avoided in older adults due to their side effects, but nortriptyline and desipramine may be better tolerated for neck and back nerve pain at lower doses. Overall, newer antidepressants (namely duloxetine) have a better safety profile and good efficacy for spine-related nerve pain. Tramadol may be tolerated in older adults, but has risk for sedation, upset stomach, and constipation. It may be used in lower doses after alternative medications have failed, and works well with co-administered acetaminophen. Opioids are avoided due to their side effects and mortality risk, but low-dose opioid therapy may be helpful for severe refractory pain with close monitoring of patients clinically.

Depression and Long-Term Prescription Opioid Use and Opioid Use Disorder: Implications for Pain Management in Cancer.

OPINION STATEMENT: Preventing depression in cancer patients on long-term opioid therapy should begin with depression screening before opioid initiation and repeated screening during treatment. In weighing the high morbidity of depression and opioid use disorder in patients with chronic cancer pain against a dearth of evidence-based therapies studied in this population, patients and clinicians are left to choose among imperfect but necessary treatment options. When possible, we advise engaging psychiatric and pain/palliative specialists through collaborative care models and recommending mindfulness and psychotherapy to all patients with significant depression alongside cancer pain. Medications for depression should be reserved for moderate to severe symptoms. We recommend escitalopram/citalopram or sertraline among selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), or the serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) duloxetine, venlafaxine, or desvenlafaxine if patients have a significant component of neuropathic pain or fibromyalgia. Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) (consider nortriptyline or desipramine, which have better anticholinergic profiles) should be considered for patients who do not respond to or tolerate SSRI/SNRIs. Existing evidence is inadequate to definitively recommend methylphenidate or novel agents, such as ketamine or psilocybin, as adjunctive treatments for cancer-related depression and pain. Physicians who treat patients with cancer pain should utilize universal precautions to limit the risk of non-medical opioid use (non-medical opioid use). Patients should be screened for non-medical opioid use behaviors at initial consultation and at regular intervals during treatment using a non-judgmental approach that reduces stigma. Co-management with an addiction specialist may be indicated for patients at high risk of non-medical opioid use and opioid use disorder. Buprenorphine and methadone are indicated for the treatment of opioid use disorder, and while they have not been systematically studied for treatment of opioid use disorder in patients with cancer pain, they do provide analgesia for cancer pain. While an interdisciplinary team approach to manage psychological stress may be beneficial, this may not be possible for patients treated outside of comprehensive cancer centers.

Treatment and diagnosis of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: An update.

When peripheral neuropathy occurs due to chemotherapy treatment, it is referred to as chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). Typically, symptoms are sensory rather than motor and include reduced feeling and heightened sensitivity to pressure, pain, temperature, and touch. The pathophysiology of CIPN is very complex, and it involves multiple mechanisms leading to its development which will be described specifically for each chemotherapeutic class. There are currently no approved or effective agents for CIPN prevention, and Duloxetine is the only medication that is an effective treatment against CIPN. There is an unavoidable necessity to develop preventative and treatment approaches for CIPN due to its detrimental impact on patients' lives. The purpose of this review is to examine CIPN, innovative pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapy and preventive strategies for this illness, and future perspectives for this condition and its therapies.

Drug-induced tremor, clinical features, diagnostic approach and management.

Tremor is the most common movement disorder and there are numerous causes of tremor. In many individuals, tremor can be due to drugs. The most common drugs associated with tremor include amiodarone, selective serotonin (and norepinephrine) reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs/SNRIs), amitriptyline, lithium, valproate, ß-adrenoceptor agonists, dopamine receptor antagonists, VMAT2 inhibitors, or drugs of abuse: ethanol, cocaine, etc. Drug-induced tremor usually resembles essential or parkinsonian tremor, depending on the offending drug; however, features such as unilateral, task-specific, position-dependent tremor or sudden onset, distractibility, entrainment and arrest with contralateral movements suggest etiologies such as dystonic or functional (psychogenic) tremor. Risk factors for drug-induced tremor include polypharmacy, male gender, older age, high doses and immediate-release preparations or reaching toxic levels of the offending drugs. Drug-induced tremor usually resolves once the offending medication is discontinued, however, persistent tremor may be observed in some cases (tardive tremor). In this manuscript, we discuss the most common causes of drug-induced tremor. This article is part of the Special Issue "Tremor" edited by Daniel D. Truong, Mark Hallett, and Aasef Shaikh.