Uptake and Discontinuation of Integrase Inhibitors (INSTIs) in a Large Cohort Setting.

BACKGROUND: Despite increased integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) use, limited large-scale, real-life data exists on INSTI uptake and discontinuation. SETTING: International multicohort collaboration. METHODS: RESPOND participants starting dolutegravir (DTG), elvitegravir (EVG), or raltegravir (RAL) after January 1, 2012 were included. Predictors of INSTI used were assessed using multinomial logistic regression. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models describe time to and factors associated with discontinuation. RESULTS: Overall, 9702 persons were included; 5051 (52.1%) starting DTG, 1933 (19.9%) EVG, and 2718 (28.0%) RAL. The likelihood of starting RAL or EVG vs DTG decreased over time and was higher in Eastern and Southern Europe compared with Western Europe. At 6 months after initiation, 8.9% (95% confidence interval: 8.3% to 9.5%) had discontinued the INSTI (6.4% DTG, 7.4% EVG, and 14.0% RAL). The main reason for discontinuation was toxicity (44.2% DTG, 42.5% EVG, 17.3% RAL). Nervous system toxicity accounted for a higher proportion of toxicity discontinuations on DTG (31.8% DTG, 23.4% EVG, 6.6% RAL). Overall, treatment simplification was highest on RAL (2.7% DTG, 1.6% EVG, and 19.8% RAL). Factors associated with a higher discontinuation risk included increasing year of INSTI initiation, female gender, hepatitis C coinfection, and previous non-AIDS-defining malignancies. Individuals in Southern and Eastern Europe were less likely to discontinue. Similar results were seen for discontinuations after 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Uptake of DTG vs EVG or RAL increased over time. Discontinuation within 6 months was mainly due to toxicity; nervous system toxicity was highest on DTG. Discontinuation was highest on RAL, mainly because of treatment simplification.

HIV treatment simplification to elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disproxil fumarate (E/C/F/TDF) plus darunavir: a pharmacokinetic study.

BACKGROUND: As a simplification strategy for treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients who have achieved virologic suppression on a multi-drug, multi-class antiretroviral regimen, the aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of once-daily elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disproxil fumarate (E/C/F/TDF) with darunavir. METHODS: A single arm, open-label 48-week study was conducted of regimen simplification to E/C/F/TDF plus darunavir 800 mg daily from stable therapy including two nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors, a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor, and an integrase inhibitor. Participants had plasma HIV viral load consistently < 200 copies/mL for ≥ 6 months, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 60 mL/min, and no genotypic resistance to major components of the study regimen. Plasma viral load was measured at weeks 2 and 4, then every 4 weeks throughout the study. Safety laboratory assessments were conducted at baseline and at weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48. Antiretroviral drug concentrations were measured at baseline and once ≥ 2 weeks after the regimen change. RESULTS: Ten HIV-infected adults (8 male and 2 female; median age 50.5 years) were enrolled. All maintained virologic suppression on the new regimen for 48 weeks. One subject experienced a decrease in eGFR from 62 mL/min at baseline to 52 mL/min at week 12; study medications were continued and his eGFR remained stable (50-59 mL/min) thereafter. No subjects discontinued study medications for renal function changes or other adverse events. Darunavir trough concentration were lower on the new regimen than on darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg (n = 5; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite low darunavir trough concentrations, treatment simplification to a two-pill, once-daily regimen of E/C/F/TDF plus darunavir was safe and effective for 48 weeks among 10 selected treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients. Trial registration The study protocol was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02199613) on July 22, 2014.

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection, Antiretroviral Therapy, and Liver Pathology.

The improvement in antiretroviral therapy has significantly impacted the lives of people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). In high-income countries, HIV deaths are predominated by liver disease consequent to viral hepatitis coinfection, alcohol, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Published liver pathology findings have shifted from being predominated by opportunistic infections to the metabolic effects of HIV and antiretroviral therapy as well as drug-induced liver injuries. Differences remain between high-income and low-income countries, where opportunistic infections and immune reconstitution syndromes, dominate findings.

Relapse of Kaposi's Sarcoma and HHV-8 viremia in an HIV-infected patient switching from protease inhibitor to integrase inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy.

Combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) reduced the incidence of Kaposi's Sarcoma (KS), mainly mediated by the suppression of HIV replication and the recovery of the immune system. The effect of specific classes of antiretrovirals on KS remains unclear. However, both in vitro and clinical studies provided evidences that protease inhibitors (PI) can inhibit Human Herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) replication and reduce KS risk and progression. Moreover, relapses of KS in HIV-infected patients switching from a PI to a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based cART have been reported. We describe here the case of a patient who experienced a relapse of KS and a rebound of HHV-8 viremia two months after switching from a PI to an integrase inhibitor-based cART.

Novel targets for antiretroviral therapy: clinical progress to date.

The advent of HIV-1 resistance to antiretroviral medications, the need for lifelong antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV-infected individuals, and the goal of minimizing ART-related adverse effects and toxicity all drive the need for new antiretroviral drugs. Two new classes of antiretroviral medications for HIV treatment, the CCR5 and integrase inhibitors, have recently been approved for use in patients in whom previous HIV treatment regimens have failed. These new agent classes are a welcome addition to other antiretroviral classes, which include nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, protease inhibitors and fusion inhibitors. Maraviroc is a CCR5 co-receptor antagonist that blocks HIV binding to the CCR5 receptor, which is a CD4 co-receptor necessary for cell entry. It is approved for use in ART-experienced patients with CCR5-tropic HIV, and was found to significantly reduce HIV viral load and increase CD4+ cell count when combined with an optimized background ART regimen (OBR). Treatment failure with maraviroc has been described and is primarily associated with the presence of CXCR4-tropic virus. Vicriviroc is another CCR5 co-receptor antagonist that is in late clinical trials. Raltegravir is the first US FDA-approved HIV-1 integrase inhibitor. It is approved for use in ART-experienced patients and was found to significantly reduce HIV viral load and increase CD4+ cell counts compared with placebo in combination with an OBR. Raltegravir has also been studied in treatment-naive patients and was found to be non-inferior to an efavirenz-based regimen. Elvitegravir is another HIV-1 integrase inhibitor in clinical development. Other new antiretroviral agents in clinical development include PRO140, a monoclonal antibody against CCR5, and bevirimat, a maturation inhibitor that prevents late-stage gag polyprotein processing. A number of other drug targets, such as CCR5 co-receptor agonists, CXCR4 co-receptor antagonists, novel fusion inhibitors, and alternative antiretroviral strategies, such as immune stimulation and gene therapy, are under investigation.

Raltegravir: new Drug. Alternative to enfuvirtide/darunavir in multidrug-resistant HIV.

(1) HIV-infected patients who have exhausted most existing antiretroviral treatment options benefit when enfuvirtide or darunavir is added to an optimised multidrug regimen based on the resistance profile; (2) Raltegravir is the first HIV integrase inhibitor to arrive on the market. It was authorised in 2007 in the European Union for patients with multiple antidrug failure; (3) A dose-finding study and two double-blind placebo-controlled trials showed that when raltegravir is added to an optimised antiretroviral regimen about two-thirds of patients achieve undetectable viral load, compared to about one-third of patients treated with an optimised regimen plus placebo. Data are currently limited to 48 weeks. In contrast, adding raltegravir barely increases the efficacy of treatments already containing enfuvirtide and darunavir. Half of patients in whom treatment failed developed viral resistance to raltegravir during these trials; (4) In previously untreated patients, a double-blind controlled trial showed no statistically significant difference in viral load at 48 weeks between raltegravir/tenofovir/lamivudine and efavirenz/tenofovir/lamivudine, but there were only about 40 patients in each group; (5) The adverse effects of raltegravir are poorly documented. In vitro findings, along with the limited clinical data available, point to a potential risk of autoimmune and lymphoproliferative disorders in the long term. (6) Raltegravir is not metabolised by the cytochrome P450 enzyme system, meaning that it should have fewer pharmacokinetic interactions than darunavir. But raltegravir is sensitive to enzyme inducers, which activate its metabolism; (7) Raltegravir is taken orally, twice a day, either during or between meals; (8) In practice, raltegravir is an option for HIV-infected patients with multiple antiretroviral drug failure and few remaining treatment options. It represents an alternative to the darunavir/enfuvirtide combination, and has the advantage of being more convenient to use. Assessment must continue, however, especially in order to identify long-term adverse effects.