Prophylactic Enoxaparin Dosing Using Anti-Factor Xa Levels in Hepatic Surgery Patients: A Pilot Study.

This study examines the safety and efficacy of using peak anti-Xa levels to achieve prophylactic enoxaparin (Lovenox, Sanofi-Aventis) levels in patients who underwent hepatic surgery. Prospectively enrolled patients undergoing major and minor hepatic procedures received postoperative enoxaparin dosing. The enoxaparin dose was adjusted to attain a peak anti-Xa level ≥ 0.20 U/ml. This group was compared to a historical cohort of patients who underwent similar procedures and received standard postoperative VTE chemoprophylaxis dosing. Inpatient postoperative VTE rates were higher in the control group when compared to the experimental group (0 patients [0.00%] vs 4 patients [8.16%]; P = .035). There was no statistically significant difference in number of postoperative blood transfusions, discharge hemoglobin, or in-hospital bleeding events. Adjusting enoxaparin dosing to achieve prophylactic peak anti-Xa levels of ≥0.20 IU/ml was associated with a reduced incidence of symptomatic inpatient postoperative VTE in patients who underwent hepatic surgery without increasing postoperative bleeding events.

Enoxaparin titrated by anti-Xa levels reduces venous thromboembolism in trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Trauma is a major risk factor for the development of a venous thromboembolism (VTE). After observing higher than expected VTE rates within our center's Trauma Quality Improvement Program data, we instituted a change in our VTE prophylaxis protocol, moving to enoxaparin dosing titrated by anti-Xa levels. We hypothesized that this intervention would lower our symptomatic VTE rates. METHODS: Adult trauma patients at a single institution meeting National Trauma Data Standard criteria from April 2015 to September 2019 were examined with regards to VTE chemoprophylaxis regimen and VTE incidence. Two groups of patients were identified based on VTE protocol-those who received enoxaparin 30 mg twice daily without routine anti-Xa levels ("pre") versus those who received enoxaparin 40 mg twice daily with dose titrated by serial anti-Xa levels ("post"). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to define statistically significant differences in VTE incidence between the two cohorts. RESULTS: There were 1698 patients within the "pre" group and 1406 patients within the "post" group. The two groups were essentially the same in terms of demographics and risk factors for bleeding or thrombosis. There was a statistically significant reduction in VTE rate (p = 0.01) and deep vein thrombosis rate (p = 0.01) but no significant reduction in pulmonary embolism rate (p = 0.21) after implementation of the anti-Xa titration protocol. Risk-adjusted Trauma Quality Improvement Program data showed an improvement in rate of symptomatic pulmonary embolism from fifth decile to first decile. CONCLUSION: A protocol titrating prophylactic enoxaparin dose based on anti-Xa levels reduced VTE rates. Implementation of this type of protocol requires diligence from the physician and pharmacist team. Further research will investigate the impact of protocol compliance and time to appropriate anti-Xa level on incidence of VTE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, Level IV.

Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulants Following Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery.

ABSTRACT: Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vary in bioavailability and sites of absorption in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). Data on DOAC use after major GIT surgery are limited. The aim of this case series was to report the impact of surgical resection or bypass of the GIT on rivaroxaban and apixaban peak plasma concentrations. This was a case series of patients who received rivaroxaban or apixaban after GIT surgery, during the period of July 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020. Peak plasma concentrations of rivaroxaban and apixaban were assessed for the expected concentrations. Of the 27 assessed patients, 18 (66.7%) received rivaroxaban, and 9 (33.3%) received apixaban. After rivaroxaban therapy, 4 of 5 patients (80%) who underwent gastrectomy, and 3 of 3 patients (100%) who underwent duodenum and proximal jejunum exclusion had peak plasma concentrations of rivaroxaban lower than the effective range, whereas 11 of 11 patients (100%) who underwent distal bowel or ileostomy had peak rivaroxaban plasma within the effective range. After apixaban therapy, 5 of 6 patients (83.3%) who underwent total or partial gastrectomy achieved effective peak concentrations. All the patients who underwent proximal and distal bowel resection or bypass had peak concentrations of apixaban within the effective range. In conclusion, surgical resection or bypass of the upper GIT could affect DOAC absorption and subsequently peak plasma concentrations. This effect was more observed among rivaroxaban recipients. An injectable anticoagulant or vitamin K antagonist may be preferred if DOAC concentrations cannot be measured after GIT surgery.

A validated UPLC-MS/MS method for the determination of CX3002 in human plasma and its application to a pharmacokinetic study.

A simple, selective, rapid, and reliable ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method was developed and validated to determine CX3002 in human plasma using CX3002-d3 as the internal standard (IS). After a rapid protein precipitation with acetonitrile (3:1, v/v), the chromatographic separation of CX3002 and IS was performed on a Thermo Hypersil GOLD C18 column (2.1 mm × 50 mm, 1.9 µm) with gradient elution at a flow rate of 0.4 ml/min. Gradient elution was achieved with mobile phase A consisting of water containing 0.1% formic acid and 5 mmol/L ammonium formate and mobile phase B consisting of methanol containing 0.1% formic acid. The detection was performed on AB SCIEX QTRAP® 5500 tandem mass spectrometry in the positive ion mode. Multiple reactions monitoring (MRM) was used for quantitative analysis at transition of m/z 460.3 â†’ 199.3 for CX3002 and m/z 463.3 â†’ 202.3 m/z for IS. The method was fully validated and displayed good linearity over a concentration range of 0.2-400 ng/mL with the correlation coefficient above 0.997. The intra-run and inter-run precision (coefficient of variation, CV) ranged from 0.60%-16.46% and the accuracy bias ranged from -7.09%-9.75%. The mean IS-normalized extraction recovery ranged from 98.30% to 104.52%. The CV(%) of IS-normalized matrix factors at the low and high QC concentration were 4.09% and 1.68%, respectively. The storage stability under different conditions was in accordance with the bioanalytical guidelines. The method was successfully applied to the pharmacokinetic study of CX3002 (30 mg) in healthy Chinese subjects.

Enoxaparin Dose Requirements to Achieve Therapeutic Low-molecular-weight Heparin Anti-factor Xa Levels in Infants and Young Children.

INTRODUCTION: Enoxaparin is commonly used to treat pediatric thrombosis. Several small retrospective studies have suggested that infants and young children require higher enoxaparin doses to achieve therapeutic anti-factor Xa levels compared with adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of hospitalized children who received enoxaparin for the treatment of thrombosis at a free-standing children's hospital. The primary objective was to ascertain the enoxaparin dose required to achieve an anti-factor Xa level of 0.5 to 1.0 U/mL among 4 age groups in a large cohort of infants and young children between 60 days and 5 years of age. RESULTS: A total of 176 infants and children were evaluated. The majority of patients were less than 1 year of age (n=104). An inverse relationship between enoxaparin dose needed to achieve therapeutic anti-factor Xa levels and patient age was noted, particularly in the first year of life. Patients who were 60 days to less than 7 months at the time of enoxaparin initiation (n=73) required the highest mean dose among the age groups at 1.73 mg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Infants and young children require higher doses of enoxaparin to achieve therapeutic anti-factor Xa levels compared with adults.

Management of Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Thromboembolism in the Context of Renal Dysfunction: Challenging Cases and Practical Algorithms.

BACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight heparin is cleared through the kidneys and is commonly used for anticoagulation in the pediatric population. OBSERVATION: We present 3 challenging cases of children requiring anticoagulation in the context of acute kidney injury, nephrotic syndrome, and hemodialysis. CONCLUSIONS: A significant change in anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) levels-used for drug monitoring-should prompt an assessment of renal function. In nephrotic syndrome, anti-Xa levels should be closely monitored when there is a change in the status of nephrotic disease activity. In hemodialysis patients, enoxaparin at once daily reduced dosing should be considered with trough and peak anti-Xa levels monitoring.

Impact of gene polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters on trough concentrations of rivaroxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Rivaroxaban is excreted from the body via multiple pathways involving glomerular filtration, drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters. In this study, we aimed to examine the impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms in P-glycoprotein, breast cancer resistance protein, cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A5 and CYP2J2 on the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban. Eighty-six patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) undergoing AF catheter ablation were enrolled in this study. In these analyses, the dose-adjusted plasma trough concentration ratio (C0h /D) of rivaroxaban was used as the pharmacokinetic index. The median (quartile range) rivaroxaban C0h /D was 3.39 (2.08-5.21) ng/mL/mg (coefficient of variation: 80.5%). The C0h /D did not differ significantly among ABCB1 c.3435C>T, c.2677G>A/T, c.1236C>T, ABCG2 c.421C>A, CYP3A5*3 and CYP2J2*7 genotypes. Stepwise selection multiple linear regression analysis showed that the estimated glomerular filtration rate was the only independent factor influencing the C0h /D of rivaroxaban (R2  = 0.152, P < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between the C0h of rivaroxaban and prothrombin time (PT) (rho = 0.357, P = 0.001). In patients with NVAF, pharmacokinetic genotype tests are unlikely to be useful for prediction of the C0h of rivaroxaban.

Impact of exogenous antithrombin on low molecular weight heparin anti-Xa activity assays in a pediatric and young adult leukemia and lymphoma cohort with variable antithrombin levels.

BACKGROUND: Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) remains the most commonly prescribed pediatric anticoagulant. There is debate whether LMWH anti-Xa assays with or without exogenous antithrombin (AT) best reflect anticoagulation effect, and how much discrepancy exists between assay types. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the effect of variable AT activity on LMWH anti-Xa levels in plasma samples from anticoagulated pediatric and young adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoma (ALL/L) patients, using two instruments and their commercial kits with and without exogenous AT (ie, four platforms). METHODS: We analyzed LMWH anti-Xa levels on 60 plasma samples with known AT activity from 12 enoxaparin-treated ALL/L patients, using four commercial kits from Siemens and Stago containing AT or not, on Siemens BCS and Stago STA R Max, respectively. RESULTS: Of 236/240 samples with interpretable results, mean AT activity was 80% (46-138%). Correlation was acceptable for published kit ranges of LMWH anti-Xa levels when comparing kits containing AT (r = 0.82, P < .0001), or not (r = 0.93, P < .0001), and within a manufacturer (Berichrom to Innovance, r = 0.92, P < .0001; Stachrom to STA-Liquid Anti-Xa r = 0.98, P < .0001). LMWH anti-Xa levels were lower in platforms without added AT (P < .0001). For Stago kits, this effect increased when AT < 70% (P = .001, n = 19, mean 56%). Assay variability, measured as mean percent difference, was less pronounced with Stago kits (14.7%, n = 49) than Siemens (41.9%, n = 50). CONCLUSIONS: Although LMWH levels from anti-Xa assays with added AT trend higher than in those without, correlation was fairly good between platforms in pediatric ALL/L plasmas, even when AT activity was <70%.

In-Vitro Sorbent-Mediated Removal of Edoxaban from Human Plasma and Albumin Solution.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Based on previous experience of sorbent-mediated ticagrelor, dabigatran, and radiocontrast agent removal, we set out in this study to test the effect of two sorbents on the removal of edoxaban, a factor Xa antagonist direct oral anticoagulant. METHODS: We circulated 100 mL of edoxaban solution during six first-pass cycles through 40-mL sorbent columns (containing either CytoSorb in three passes or Porapak Q 50-80 mesh in the remaining three passes) during experiments using human plasma and 4% bovine serum albumin solution as drug vehicles. Drug concentration was measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Edoxaban concentration in two experiments performed with human plasma dropped from 276.8 to 2.7 ng/mL and undetectable concentrations, respectively, with CytoSorb or Porapak Q 50-80 mesh (p = 0.0031). The average edoxaban concentration decreased from 407 ng/mL ± 216 ng/mL to 3.3 ng/mL ± 7 ng/mL (p = 0.017), for a removal rate of 99% across all six samples of human plasma (two samples) and bovine serum albumin solution (four samples). In four out of the six adsorbed samples, the drug concentrations were undetectable. CONCLUSION: Sorbent-mediated technology may represent a viable pathway for edoxaban removal from human plasma or albumin solution.

Early Anti-Xa Assay-Guided Low Molecular Weight Heparin Chemoprophylaxis Is Safe in Adult Patients with Acute Traumatic Brain Injury.

This study evaluated the safety of early anti-factor Xa assay-guided enoxaparin dosing for chemoprophylaxis in patients with TBI. We hypothesized that assay-guided chemoprophylaxis would be comparable in the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) progression to fixed dosing. An observational analysis of adult patients with blunt traumatic brain injury (TBI) was performed at a Level I trauma center from August 2016 to September 2017. Patients in the assay-guided group were treated with an initial enoxaparin dose of 0.5 mg/kg, with peak anti-factor Xa activity measured four hours after the third dose. Prophylactic range was defined as 0.2 to 0.5 IU/mL with a dose adjustment of ± 10 mg based on the assay result. The assay-guided group was compared with historical fixed-dose controls and to a TBI cohort from the most recent Trauma Quality Improvement Project dataset. Of 179 patients included in the study, 85 were in the assay-guided group and 94 were in the fixed-dose group. Compared with the fixed-dose group, the assay-guided group had a lower Glasgow Coma Score and higher Injury Severity Score. The proportion of severe (Abbreviated Injury Score, head ≥3) TBI, ICH progression, and venous thromboembolism rates were similar between all groups. The assay-guided and fixed-dose groups had chemoprophylaxis initiated earlier than the Trauma Quality Improvement Project group. The assay-guided group had the highest percentage of low molecular weight heparin use. Early initiation of enoxaparin anti-factor Xa assay-guided venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis has a comparable risk of ICH progression to fixed dosing in patients with TBI. These findings should be validated prospectively in a multicenter study.

Can an anti-Xa assay for unfractionated heparin be used to assess the presence of rivaroxaban in critical situations?

OBJECTIVE: Although rivaroxaban has recently become widely used for thrombosis treatment, it is difficult for clinicians to make clinical decisions in critical situations, such as emergent surgery or interventions, because a specific anti-Xa assay is not available in many laboratories. This study assessed the relationships between rivaroxaban-specific anti-factor Xa activity (AXA) and unfractionated heparin (UFH)-specific AXA and determined the cutoff level for UFH-specific AXA in critical situations for patients undergoing rivaroxaban therapy. METHODS: Thirty-eight blood samples were collected from patients with cancer-associated thrombosis receiving rivaroxaban therapy. All samples were assessed using both rivaroxaban-specific and UFH-specific anti-Xa assays. Routine coagulation studies, including prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time, were also conducted on the samples. RESULTS: A positive dose-dependent correlation between rivaroxaban-specific and UFH-specific AXA was evident (R = 0.97; P < .0001). Rivaroxaban-specific AXA was also positively correlated with PT (R = 0.95; P < .0001) but only weakly with activated partial thromboplastin time (R = 0.67; P < .0001). Patients with plasma rivaroxaban concentrations <100 ng/mL were found to have UFH-specific AXA <1.41 IU/mL and PT <17.3 seconds, with sensitivities of 100% and 93.3% and specificities of 87.0% and 95.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that UFH-calibrated AXA correlates strongly with plasma rivaroxaban concentration. This assay appears to be sensitive to the presence of rivaroxaban, which may be advantageous in the setting of assessing drug levels for critical events. These findings suggest that if a rivaroxaban-specific anti-Xa assay is unavailable, the chromogenic anti-Xa assay for UFH may be useful to assess the anticoagulant effects of rivaroxaban.

[Theophylline adenosine dipyridamole (CTAD) and citrate evaluation to survey unfractionated heparin treatment: a delayed centrifugation validation for anti-Xa measurement?]. / Évaluation du citrate théophylline adénosine dipyridamole (CTAD) et du citrate comme anticoagulant dans la surveillance du traitement par héparine non fractionnée : validation d'une centrifugation différée pour le dosage de l'anti-Xa.

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is the main anticoagulante used in intensive care unit. The anticoagulant effect is monitored by activated partial thrombin time (aPTT) and anti-Xa activity (anti-Xa) measurement. However, delayed centrifugation induces platelet factor 4 (PF4) release and anti-Xa decrease. Several studies have concluded that aPTT and anti-Xa measurement should be performed within 2 hours in citrated anticoagulant but may be delayed longer in citrate theophylline adenosine and dypiridamol (CTAD) anticoagulant. The objective of this study was to compare the stability of both aPTT and anti-Xa in citrate and CTAD samples, and to determine the effect of delayed centrifugation on both aPTT, anti-Xa results, and PF4 release in citrate samples only. METHODS: aPTT and anti-Xa were measured in citrate and CTAD anticoagulant samples from 93 patients. Delayed centrifugation was performed in citrate samples from 31 additional patients, with hourly aPTT and anti-Xa measurement from 1 to 6 hours. In 14 of these last patients, PF4 release was also evaluated with Human CXCL4/PF4 Quantikine ELISA Kit. RESULTS: We observed a significant correlation between citrate and CTAD anticoagulant for aPTT (r2=0.94) and anti-Xa (r2=0.95). With Bland-Altman correlation, a minor bias was observed for anti-Xa (-0.025±0.041). Delayed centrifugation in citrated anticoagulant showed an excellent concordance from 1 to 4 hours for aPTT (-4.0±5.3 s) and anti-Xa (1.10-9±0.058 UI/mL) measurements. Moreover, PF4 release was not different between 1 hour (31.5±14.7 ng/mL) and 4 hours (33.8±11.8 ng/mL). CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that anti-Xa measurement for unfractionated heparin should be done 4 hours in citrated plasma and that CTAD was not better than citrate. However, these initial findings require confirmation using other aPTT and calibrated anti-Xa assays.

Correlation of Thromboelastography with Apparent Rivaroxaban Concentration: Has Point-of-Care Testing Improved?

BACKGROUND: Concern remains over reliable point-of-care testing to guide reversal of rivaroxaban, a commonly used factor Xa inhibitor, in high-acuity settings. Thromboelastography (TEG), a point-of-care viscoelastic assay, may have the ability to detect the anticoagulant effect of rivaroxaban. The authors ascertained the association of apparent rivaroxaban concentration with thromboelastography reaction time, i.e., time elapsed from blood sample placement in analyzer until beginning of clot formation, as measured using TEG and TEG6S instruments (Haemonetics Corporation, USA), hypothesizing that reaction time would correlate to degree of functional factor Xa impairment. METHODS: The authors prospectively performed a diagnostic accuracy study comparing coagulation assays to apparent (i.e., indirectly assessed) rivaroxaban concentration in trauma patients with and without preinjury rivaroxaban presenting to a single center between April 2016 and July 2018. Blood samples at admission and after reversal or 24 h postadmission underwent TEG, TEG6S, thrombin generation assay, anti-factor Xa chromogenic assay, prothrombin time (PT), and ecarin chromogenic assay testing. The authors determined correlation of kaolin TEG, TEG6S, and prothrombin time to apparent rivaroxaban concentration. Receiver operating characteristic curve compared capacity to distinguish therapeutic rivaroxaban concentration (i.e., greater than or equal to 50 ng/ml) from nontherapeutic concentrations. RESULTS: Eighty rivaroxaban patients were compared to 20 controls. Significant strong correlations existed between rivaroxaban concentration and TEG reaction time (ρ = 0.67; P < 0.001), TEG6S reaction time (ρ = 0.68; P < 0.001), and prothrombin time (ρ = 0.73; P < 0.001), however reaction time remained within the defined normal range for the assay. Rivaroxaban concentration demonstrated strong but not significant association with coagulation assays postreversal (n = 9; TEG reaction time ρ = 0.62; P = 0.101; TEG6S reaction time ρ = 0.57; P = 0.112) and small nonsignificant association for controls (TEG reaction time: ρ = -0.04; P = 0.845; TEG6S reaction time: ρ = -0.09; P = 0.667; PT-neoplastine: ρ = 0.19; P = 0.301). Rivaroxaban concentration (area under the curve, 0.91) and TEG6S reaction time (area under the curve, 0.84) best predicted therapeutic rivaroxaban concentration and exhibited similar receiver operating characteristic curves (P = 0.180). CONCLUSIONS: Although TEG6S demonstrates significant strong correlation with rivaroxaban concentration, values within normal range limit clinical utility rendering rivaroxaban concentration the gold standard in measuring anticoagulant effect.

Drug interactions and pharmacogenetic factors contribute to variation in apixaban concentration in atrial fibrillation patients in routine care.

Factor Xa-inhibitor apixaban is an oral anticoagulant prescribed in atrial fibrillation (AF) for stroke prevention. Its pharmacokinetic profile is known to be affected by cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A metabolism, while it is also a substrate of the efflux transporters ATP-binding cassette (ABC)B1 (P-glycoprotein) and ABCG2 (breast cancer resistance protein, BCRP). In this study, we assessed the impact of interacting medication and pharmacogenetic variation to better explain apixaban concentration differences among 358 Caucasian AF patients. Genotyping (ABCG2, ABCB1, CYP3A4*22, CYP3A5*3) was performed by TaqMan assays, and apixaban quantified by mass spectrometry. The typical patient was on average 77.2 years old, 85.5 kg, and had a serum creatinine of 103.1 µmol/L. Concomitant amiodarone, an antiarrhythmic agent and moderate CYP3A/ABCB1 inhibitor, the impaired-function variant ABCG2 c.421C > A, and sex predicted higher apixaban concentrations when controlling for age, weight and serum creatinine (multivariate regression; R2 = 0.34). Our findings suggest that amiodarone and ABCG2 genotype contribute to interpatient apixaban variability beyond known clinical factors.

Simple Laboratory Test Utilization Interventions to Reduce Inappropriate Specialty Coagulation Testing.

OBJECTIVES: The naming convention in coagulation may cause confusion in electronic ordering systems, leading to inappropriate test orders. We implemented test utilization efforts and studied utilization before and after interventions for two specialty coagulation assays. METHODS: Two interventions were implemented: test names were changed from factor assay to activity, and residents reviewed all factor V and X requests. A retrospective review of factor V and X activity orders was performed for the period 1 year before and after interventions. RESULTS: After interventions, factor V and X activity orders decreased by approximately 40%. Resulted tests decreased by 53.8% and 47.8%, corresponding to reductions of $2,493.05 and $1,867.80 per year in laboratory charges for factor V and factor X activity, respectively. Abnormal factor V activity results increased from 45% to 59%. Factor V activity orders from outpatient clinics decreased by 21.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Simple interventions can reduce inappropriate specialty coagulation test orders and unnecessary costs.

Monitoring anti-Xa levels in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism treated with bemiparin.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the relationship between therapeutic (weight-adjusted) dose of bemiparin and anti-Xa activity in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and cancer in comparison with a cohort of patients with VTE without cancer, and its relationship with outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study that comprised a cohort of patients with cancer-associated VTE and a cohort of non-cancer patients with VTE, all of them treated with bemiparin. The ethics committee approved the study and informed consent was obtained from the patients. RESULTS: One hundred patients were included (52 with cancer and 48 without cancer), with a median follow-up of 9.8 months. Mean anti-Xa activity was 0.89 (± 0.33) UI/mL in oncological patients and 0.83 (± 0.30) UI/mL in non-cancer patients (mean difference - 0.05 95% CI - 0.18; 0.06). A multiple linear regression model showed that anti-Xa peak was associated with the dose/kg independently of possible confounding variables (presence of cancer, age, sex and eGFR-estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate), in a way that for every 1 UI of dose/kg increase, the anti-Xa peak activity increased 0.006 UI/mL (95% CI 0.003; 0.009) (p < 0.001). The predictive capacity of anti-Xa peak in the oncology cohort showed an area under the ROC curve of 0.46 (95% CI 0.24-0.68), 0.70 (95% CI 0.49-0.91) and 0.74 (95% CI 0.44-0.94) for death, first bleeding and recurrence of VTE, respectively, and none was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: In patients with venous thromboembolism treated with bemiparin, anti-Xa levels were not influenced by the presence of cancer.

Description of anti-Xa monitoring practices during low molecular weight heparin use.

Certain patient populations (pregnancy, cancer, renal impairment, and obesity) may be at higher risk of adverse events during low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) therapy and may benefit from anti-Xa monitoring. Yet, evidence supporting a standardized approach to anti-Xa monitoring correlated to clinical outcomes is lacking. Patients with at least one documented anti-Xa level and receiving LMWH within a 6-month period were identified. In a 6-month period, 224 adult LMWH patients with 359 anti-Xa levels were identified. Anti-Xa monitoring was most commonly performed in patients with active cancer receiving venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment doses (57.4%) or obese patients receiving VTE prophylaxis (48.1%). Anti-Xa monitoring during renal impairment and pregnancy were infrequent (0.9% and 1.8%, respectively). Most (71.9%) anti-Xa levels were therapeutic, but only 45% were drawn correctly in relation to LMWH administration time. Compared to those with therapeutic anti-Xa levels, patients with out-of-range levels were four times as likely to receive a LMWH therapy change (odds ratio, 4.16; 95% confidence interval, 2.53-6.84). However, when levels were supratherapeutic or subtherapeutic, the LMWH doses remained unchanged in one-third to one-half of patients, respectively. Anti-Xa monitoring was most commonly performed in patients with cancer or obesity and was more common with VTE prophylaxis dosing. The majority of levels were therapeutic, indicating that anti-Xa monitoring may be unnecessary even in high-risk patient populations. Many out-of-range anti-Xa levels did not prompt a change in LMWH therapy. Further research is still needed to determine if anti-Xa- guided LMWH dosing improves clinical outcomes.

Assessment of Anti-Factor Xa Levels of Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery Given Once-Daily Enoxaparin Prophylaxis: A Clinical Study Examining Enoxaparin Pharmacokinetics.

Importance: Between 4% and 12% of patients undergoing colorectal surgery and receiving enoxaparin, 40 mg per day, have a postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) event. An improved understanding of why "breakthrough" VTE events occur despite guideline-compliant prophylaxis is an important patient safety question. Objective: To determine the proportion of patients undergoing colorectal surgery who received adequate anticoagulation based on peak anti-factor Xa (aFXa) levels while receiving enoxaparin at 40 mg per day. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial was conducted between February 2017 and July 2018 with 90-day follow-up at a quaternary academic medical center in the Intermountain West and included patients undergoing colorectal surgery who had surgery after receiving general anesthesia, were admitted for at least 3 days, and received enoxaparin, 40 mg once daily. Interventions: All patients had aFXa levels measured after receiving enoxaparin 40 mg per day. Patients whose aFXa level was out of range entered the trial's interventional arm where real-time enoxaparin dose adjustment and repeated aFXa measurement were performed. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome: in-range peak aFXa levels (goal range, 0.3-0.5 IU/mL) with enoxaparin, 40 mg per day. Secondary outcomes: (1) in-range trough aFXa levels (goal range, 0.1-0.2 IU/mL) and (2) the proportion of patients with in-range peak aFXa levels from enoxaparin, 40 mg once daily, vs the real-time enoxaparin dose adjustment protocol. Results: Over 16 months, 116 patients undergoing colorectal surgery (65 women [56.0%]; 99 white individuals [85.3%], 13 Hispanic or Latino individuals [11.2%], and 4 Pacific Islander individuals [3.5%]; mean [range] age, 52.1 [18-85] years) were enrolled. Among 106 patients (91.4%) whose peak aFXa level was appropriately drawn, 72 (67.9%) received inadequate anticoagulation (aFXa < 0.3 IU/mL) with enoxaparin, 40 mg per day. Weight and peak aFXa levels were inversely correlated (r2 = 0.38). Forty-seven patients (77%) had a trough aFXa level that was not detectable (ie, most patients had no detectable level of anticoagulation for at least 12 hours per day). Real-time enoxaparin dose adjustment was effective. Patients were significantly more likely to achieve an in-range peak aFXa with real-time dose adjustment as opposed to fixed dosing alone (85.4% vs 29.2%, P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: This study supports the finding that most patients undergoing colorectal surgery receive inadequate prophylaxis from enoxaparin, 40 mg once daily. These findings may explain the high rate of "breakthrough" VTE observed in many clinical trials. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02704052.