Subcutaneous administration of drugs and hydration in acute palliative care units: Physician attitudes and beliefs in the United States and Canada.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the attitudes and beliefs of PCU physicians leaders in the United States versus Canada regarding the subcutaneous method in the administration of medications and hydration in order to gain a better understanding as to why variations in practice exist. METHODS: This survey trial took place from November 2022 to May 2023. The MD Anderson Cancer Center institutional review board in Houston, Texas, approved this study. The participants were the physician leaders of the acute palliative care units (PCUs) in the United States and Canada. The survey comprised questions formulated by the study investigators regarding the perceived comfort, efficiency, and preference of using the subcutaneous versus the intravenous method. The consent form and survey links were emailed to the participants. RESULTS: Sixteen PCUs were identified in the United States and 15 PCUs in Canada. Nine US and 8 Canadian physicians completed the survey. Physicians in Canada were more likely to use the subcutaneous route for administering opioids, antiemetics, neuroleptics, and hydration. They preferred subcutaneous over intravenous or intramuscular routes (p = 0.017). Canadian physicians felt their nursing staff was more comfortable with subcutaneous administration (p = 0.022) and that it was easier to administer (p = 0.02). US physicians felt the intravenous route was more efficient (p = 0.013). SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: The study results suggest that exposure to the subcutaneous route influences a physician's perception. Further research is needed to explore ways to incorporate its use to a greater degree in the US healthcare system.

Preference for the fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer (PHranceSCa): A randomised, open-label phase II study.

AIM: The aim of the study was to assess patient preference for the fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection (PH FDC SC) in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer in PHranceSCa (NCT03674112). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who completed neoadjuvant P + H + chemotherapy + surgery were randomised 1:1 to three intravenous (IV) P + H cycles followed by three cycles of PH FDC SC or vice versa (crossover) and then chose subcutaneous (SC) injection or IV infusion to continue up to 18 cycles (continuation). Assessments were via patient and healthcare professional (HCP) questionnaires. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty patients were randomised (cut-off: 24 February 2020); 136 (85.0%, 95% confidence interval: 78.5-90.2%) preferred SC; 22 (13.8%) preferred IV; 2 (1.3%) had no preference. The main reasons for SC preference were reduced clinic time (n = 119) and comfort during administration (n = 73). One hundred and forty-one patients (88.1%) were very satisfied/satisfied with SC injection versus 108 (67.5%) with IV infusion; 86.9% chose PH FDC SC continuation. HCP perceptions of median patient treatment room time ranged from 33.0-50.0 min with SC and 130.0-300.0 min with IV. Most adverse events (AEs) were grade 1/2 (no 4/5s); serious AE rates were low. AE rates before and after switching were similar (cycles 1-3 IV → cycles 4-6 SC: 77.5% → 72.5%; cycles 1-3 SC → cycles 4-6 IV: 77.5% → 63.8%). CONCLUSION: Most patients strongly preferred PH FDC SC over P + H IV. PH FDC SC was generally well tolerated, with no new safety signals (even when switching), and offers a quicker alternative to IV infusion.

Pain-less injection: principles and pearls.

There has been an exponential growth in the number of dermatologic procedures performed over the past two decades. This surge in procedural volumes is accompanied by increasing utilization of local anesthetics. A proper technique in administering local anesthesia is necessary to minimize pain and promote comfort, as it is often regarded as the most painful part of cutaneous procedures. Pain is a psychophysiological phenomenon that involves attention, cognitive appraisal, and emotion. Sensory feedback and anxiety are two important aspects of pain perception. This article aims to introduce a novel way that minimizes pain and discomfort associated with local anesthetics. It is the authors' experience that painless injection is achievable by keeping syringes/needles out of sight, proceeding with injection without pre-procedure warning, and engaging patients in a conversation or simple tasks.

Factors influencing patient's perception of long-term treatment with low-molecular-weight heparins for cancer-associated thrombosis: an updated analysis of TROPIQUE, a prospective observational study.

PURPOSE: Our objective was to compare patient's expectations to their experience and to identify factors predictive of patient's perception of long-term LMWH for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). METHODS: Results from the validated Perception Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaires (PACTQ) completed before inclusion (PACTQ1 for expectations) and at the end (PACTQ2 for convenience and satisfaction) of the 6-month TROPIQUE study were studied with principal component analysis. Possible predictive factors of improved perception of LMWH treatment were analyzed with the Kruskall-Wallis test. RESULTS: Among 409 included patients treated with LMWH, 269 PACT-Q1 and 139 PACT-Q2 were evaluable for treatment perception. Patients had high expectations (A1-A7 score of 26.7 ± 3.5, max = 35). Treatment cost (A7 = 1.90 ± 1.31) and concern about a mistake in anticoagulation (A5 = 1.93 ± 1.12) had little importance while LMWH treatment was considered easy to use (A4 = 4.20 ± 0.93). Six-month treatment with LMWH was associated with a high rate of convenience (B1-B11, C1-C2 = 55.1 ± 8.38, max = 65) and a high satisfaction score (D1-D7 = 25.1 ± 4.32, max = 35). Patients' confidence in treatment and perception of possible LMWH side effects were moderate while perception of autonomy and independence significantly improved at the end of the study compared to inclusion. PACT-Q2 satisfaction score was low in patients who experienced bleeding (PACT-Q2 24.1 ± 3.3 vs. 25.1 ± 4.3). LMWH twice daily tended to be found less convenient compared than once daily (53.3 ± 7.2 vs. 55.0 ± 8.3). CONCLUSION: CAT patients had a good perception of the 6-month LMWH treatment when comparing expectations and experience. Using a quantitative scale validated in the general population for VTE and subcutaneous injection and including a large number of patients, bleeding complications and LMWH twice daily were associated with a nonsignificant trend towards a worsen perception.

Implications of subcutaneous or intravenous delivery of trastuzumab; further insight from patient interviews in the PrefHer study.

BACKGROUND: The 2 Cohort randomised PrefHer trial examined the preferences of HER2+ve primary breast cancer patients for intravenous (IV) or subcutaneous (SC) delivery of trastuzumab via a Single Injectable Device (SID) or hand-held syringe (HHS). The novel approach and design of the study permitted an in-depth exploration of patients' experiences, the impact that different modes of delivery had on patients' well-being and implications for future management. METHODS: The preferences, experiences and general comments of patients in the PrefHer study were collected via specific semi-structured interview schedules. Exploratory analyses of data were conducted using standard methodology. The final question invited patients to make further comments, which were divided into 9 thematic categories - future delivery, compliments, time/convenience, practical considerations, pain/discomfort, study design, side-effects, psychological impact, and perceived efficacy. RESULTS: 267/467 (57%) patients made 396 additional comments, 7 were neutral, 305 positive and 86 negative. The three top categories generating the largest number of comments were compliments and gratitude about staff and being part of PrefHer (75/396; 19%), the potential future delivery of SC trastuzumab (73/396; 18%), and practical considerations about SC administration (60/396; 15%). CONCLUSIONS: Eliciting patient preferences about routes of administration of drugs via comprehensive interviews within a randomised cross-over trial yielded rich and important information. The few negative comments made demonstrated a need for proper staff training in SC administration Patients were grateful to have been part of the trial, and would have liked to continue with SC delivery. The possibility of home administration in the future also seemed acceptable. EUDRACT NUMBER: 2010-024099-25.

Lay caregivers' perspectives on injecting subcutaneous medications at home.

BACKGROUND: Most palliative care patients prefer to be cared for at home. While promoting quality of life for patients, this preference impacts on their caregivers. Lay caregivers in Australia can be required to deliver and adjust complex medication regimens.This study aimed to investigate caregivers' perceptions concerning the injection of subcutaneous medications. METHODS: Fourteen caregivers were interviewed on two occasions, once during the caregiving phase and two months after bereavement. RESULTS: In the first interview, caregivers expressed anxieties associated with their ability to undertake the task of administering injections, including fears of overdosing their family member. In the bereavement interview caregivers reflected they were pleased they had contributed to the symptom relief of a family member and that although they would not necessarily volunteer to inject family members again, they were generally empowered by the experience. It is important for health professionals to support lay caregivers to successfully achieve their extended caregiving role.

Randomized comparison of the single-injection volar subcutaneous block and the two-injection dorsal block for digital anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Two commonly used methods of digital nerve block with local anesthetic are the two-injection dorsal technique and the single-injection volar subcutaneous technique. The authors compared these two digital block techniques with respect to local anesthetic injection pain and recipient preference of anesthetic technique. METHODS: Twenty-seven volunteers had the long finger of each hand injected with 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. The two-injection dorsal method was used on one long finger and the other long finger received the volar single-injection technique. Volunteers completed a pain scale for each block and were then asked which technique they would prefer. The area of anesthetic skin was assessed in each finger by pinprick testing, and photographs were taken. RESULTS: Although there was a lower pain score for the volar single-injection block, the difference in pain scores between the two techniques was not statistically significant. However, 22 of the 27 subjects indicated that they would select the volar over the dorsal block if a future block was required, and this preference for the volar block was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Although the difference in pain scores between the two techniques was not statistically significant, volunteers who received both blocks would prefer the volar single-injection subcutaneous block if given a choice. Therefore, the single-injection volar subcutaneous block is recommended as the technique of choice for anesthesia of the digit, except in patients for whom anesthesia over the dorsum of the proximal phalanx is required. These patients may prefer a supplementary dorsal nerve block or a traditional two-injection block.

Patients' and relatives' perceptions about intravenous and subcutaneous hydration.

Hydration during palliative care is a controversial topic. Most of the arguments are based on anedoctal reports that have not been substantiated with scientific data. Given that the choice is problematic from a clinical perspective, preferences of patients and family should dictate whether intravenous fluids are administered. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient and family perceptions about hydration and two modes of providing hydration. Fifty-four consecutive patients admitted to an acute pain relief and palliative care unit who required hydration completed a questionnaire regarding their perceptions on hydration and modes of hydration. Similarly, the principal family carer was chosen and similar questions were posed. For most items, patients and relatives agreed, considering hydration as a useful medical treatment that is able to provide some nutrition. The intravenous route was considered able to improve the clinical condition and to have a positive psychological meaning, representing an acceptable burden. The subcutaneous route was considered less effective, and not less bothersome than the intravenous route. Most patients and relatives agreed with continuing hydration at home, if necessary, preferring the intravenous route. Other than technical considerations, which can be variable according to the clinical setting, the perceived benefits of artificial hydration by the caregivers and patients are central to the ethical, emotional, and cultural considerations involved in their decision making. Most patients and relatives surveyed accepted and were in favor of intravenous hydration.