The importance of neurology and genetic testing in the patient with non-cleft velopharyngeal dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: A significant proportion of the referrals made to a speech investigation clinic in a cleft unit include patients with non-cleft velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD). This study aims to quantify the underlying diagnoses of these patients and describe the investigative pathway and diagnostic information subsequent to presentation in our clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The case notes of 136 consecutive patients with non-cleft VPD who attended our Velopharyngeal Investigation (VPI) clinic from July 2014-December 2019 were reviewed. RESULTS: In the paediatric group (n = 118) the most common cause was 22q11 chromosomal anomalies (n = 46), while post palatal tumour resection was the commonest cause of acquired non-cleft VPD in adults (n = 8). Fifty-nine patients were referred to the clinic with a known underlying pathology such as a syndromic diagnosis. Of those presenting without a known aetiology, fifty-eight were referred onto our genetics and/or neurology colleagues. Although a genetic or neurological cause could not be identified in some of those patients, thirty-one patients received a new diagnosis, with subsequent implications for ongoing care. CONCLUSION: There are a wide range of diagnoses resulting in non-cleft VPD, but there are very few large-scale studies focusing on investigating these patients for an underlying aetiology. This study highlights the role of genetics and neurology in the diagnosis and management plan for this cohort of patients.

Is there a correlation between skull base flexure and palatal anomalies in patients with 22q11 deletion syndrome and velopharyngeal dysfunction?

The study aimed at assessing the relationship between skull base morphology, represented by skull base and nasopharyngeal angles, and palatal anatomy among patients with 22q11DS and velopharyngeal dysfunction. Retrospective analysis of patients with 22q11DS and velopharyngeal dysfunction. Age, sex, severity of velopharyngeal dysfunction, type of cleft (overt cleft palate, submucous cleft palate, occult submucous cleft palate, or no-CP, and cephalometric skull base angles were reviewed. Correlations between type of palatal anomaly and the angles were assessed. Among 132 patients, 71 were male (53.8%) and 61 were female (46.2%), ages 3.3-40.0 years (mean 8.3 ± 6.10). No difference in the mean cranial-base angle (P = 0.353) or in the distribution of the three types of cranial base angle sizes was found among the palatal anomaly groups (P = 0.137). More men had normal cranial base angles and more women had acute angulation (P = 0.008). A positive correlation was found between the skull base and nasopharyngeal angles (P = 0.001, r = -0.590). No direct correlation was found between cranial base morphology and palatal anomalies in patients with 22q11DS, and velopharyngeal dysfunction. This is probably because skull base and palate morphology contribute independently to velopharyngeal dysfunction.

Velopharyngeal Incompetence in Children With 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: Velar and Pharyngeal Dimensions.

ABSTRACT: The surgical management of velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI) in children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2 DS) is challenging. There are numerous approaches and children often undergo more than one operation. Our aim was to develop a method using images from routine lateral videofluoroscopy to study the dimensions of the velopharynx in this cohort.We analyzed 22 pre-operative lateral videofluoroscopy recordings of children with 22q11.2 DS and VPI. Fourteen had a submucous cleft palate (SMCP) and 8 had no obvious palatal abnormality but who were subsequently labelled as having an occult submucous cleft palate (OSMCP). The control data were 10 historic records of children with cleft lip and an intact palate. The authors identified key points on radiographs of the velum at rest and when elevated to measure the total velar length, functional velar length and pharyngeal depth and compared them ratiometrically.The intra-observer reliability was > 0.9 whereas the inter-observer reliability was > 0.74. The velopharyngeal depth/total velar length was significantly greater in 22q11.2 DS than the control group P < 0.001. There was no difference between SMCP and OSMCP patients, P = 0.556. There was no difference in the functional velar length/total velar length between 22q11.2 DS and controls (P = 0.763).In this study, the authors demonstrate a reliable method to gain useful ratiometric measurements of the velopharynx. This may help with treatment planning. Children with 22q11.2 DS and VPI have a larger velopharyngeal depth/total velar length ratio that may explain some of the difficulty in management.

Occult subtotal cleft of the secondary palate with VPI associated to 8q22.2 deletion.

BACKGROUND: Submucous cleft palate is a cleft of the secondary palate with low phenotypic gene expression. It can occur as an isolated malformation or associated with a syndrome that includes certain facial features and other vocal tract malformations. Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) is rare in cases of non - syndromic occult clefts of the secondary palate (OSCSP). In contrast, syndromic OCSP has a high prevalence of VPI. VPI requires surgical treatment in the vast majority of cases. OBJECTIVE: To present a case of OSCSP with VPI after partial tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy (T & A) associated with facial features and other vocal tract malformations. A chromosomal abnormality (8q22.2 deletion) was demonstrated by cytogenetic testing. CASE PRESENTATION: Eight year old female with VPI following partial T & A. OSCSP was diagnosed. Complete T & A was performed in preparation for a pharyngeal flap. Pharyngeal flap surgery was customized according to findings of videonasopharyngoscopy (VNP) and multiplanar videofluoroscopy (MPVF). VPI was corrected without intraoperative or postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: The presence of multiple vocal tract malformations should be a red flag for suspecting a syndromic OSCSP. Surgical treatment of VPI in cases of OSCSP should be performed after complete T & A, Imaging procedures for assessing neck blood vessels and it should be customized according to imaging (VNP and MPVF) findings.

Palatal evaluation and treatment in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.

Palatal involvement occurs commonly in patients with 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome (22qDS), and includes palatal clefting and velopharyngeal dysfunction in the absence of overt or submucous clefts. The reported incidence and distribution of palatal abnormalities vary in the literature. The aim of this article is to revisit the incidence and presenting features of palatal abnormalities in a large cohort of patients with 22qDS, summarize the surgical treatments performed in this cohort, and provide an overview of surgical treatment protocols and management guidelines for palatal abnormalities in this syndrome. Charts of 1,121 patients seen through the 22q and You Center at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia were reviewed for palatal status, demographic factors, deletion size, and corrective surgical procedures. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's chi-squared test to identify differences between gender, deletion size, and palatal abnormality. Of the patients with complete evaluations, 67% were found to have a palatal abnormality. The most common finding was velopharyngeal dysfunction in 55.2% of patients, and in 33.3% of patients, this occurred in the absence of palatal clefting. There was no significant difference in the incidence of palatal abnormalities by gender; however, a difference was noted among race (p < 0.01) and deletion sizes (p < 0.01). For example, Caucasian and Asian patients presented with a much higher prevalence of palatal abnormalities, and conversely those with nested deletions presented with a much lower rate of palatal defects. Overall, 26.9% of patients underwent palatal surgery, and the most common indication was velopharyngeal dysfunction. Palatal abnormalities are a hallmark feature of 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome; understanding the incidence, presenting features, and treatment protocols are essential for practitioners counseling and treating families affected with this disorder.

Retropharyngeal lipostructure in the treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency: A prospective study and update.

INTRODUCTION: Retropharyngeal lipostructure is a recent procedure in velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI), offering an effective alternative to heavier surgery. OBJECTIVES: To update and assess retropharyngeal lipostructure as a treatment for VPI in the University Hospital Center of Rouen (France). TYPE OF STUDY: Single-center prospective study, from May 2012 to May 2014. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six patients (4 girls, 2 boys) presenting with VPI were treated by retropharyngeal lipostructure. Age at surgery ranged between 6 and 12 years. Four of the patients bore a 22q11 microdeletion. Treatment was indicated in case of Borel-Maisonny type 2b (n=2) or 2m (n=4) despite well-conducted speech therapy and of≥50% velopharyngeal sphincter closure on nasal endoscopy. Patients were assessed preoperatively and at 3 months, by a multidisciplinary team. Borel-Maisonny type was assessed by a speech therapist. Nasality was measured on assisted vocal evaluation (EVA®). Sphincter closure was assessed on dynamic MRI. RESULTS: Between 6 and 8cm3autologous fat was injected. At 3months, 4 children showed 1-grade improvement in Borel-Maisonny type. Nasality decreased systematically, from a mean 14.5% preoperatively to 10.5% postoperatively. MRI showed improvement in all cases, with complete closure in occlusive vowels in 3 children. CONCLUSION: EVA® and MRI provide precise objective assessment of VPI. Retropharyngeal lipostructure is a simple, relatively non-invasive, reproducible technique, providing good results in VPI.

22q11.2 Deletion: Surgical and Speech Outcomes of Patients With Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Treated With a Superiorly Based Pharyngeal Flap as the Primary Surgery.

The most frequent palate diagnoses in patients with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome are a classic submucous cleft, occult, and velopharyngeal insufficiency without cleft, which generates alterations in speech that require surgery. Surgical protocols are controversial owing to syndrome characteristics that make their handling more complex. Pharyngeal flap pharyngoplasty is effective for this type of patient. The objective of this study is to examine the surgical management of velopharyngeal insufficiency in patients with chromosome 22 deletion, using a pharyngeal flap as the primary surgery. The clinical records of patients with chromosome 22 deletion and velopharyngeal insufficiency between 2015 and 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. Eight patients underwent pharyngeal flap pharyngoplasty as a primary surgery, including 1 with velopharyngeal insufficiency without a cleft, 1 with a classic submucous cleft, and 6 with occult submucous cleft. The pre- and postoperative protocol performed by speech therapists and surgeons included clinical evaluation of the oral cavity; perceptual, video recording, and nasometry speech evaluation; and videonasopharyngoscopy. All perceptual parameters and nasometry results significantly changed. Of the cases, 88% achieved a flap with the expected width and height and complete closure of the velopharyngeal sphincter. One patient required flap revision. Four of the 8 patients achieved normal resonance, and 2 of 8 showed mild hypernasality. Using the pharyngeal flap pharyngoplasty as a primary technique to correct velopharyngeal insufficiency in patients with chromosome 22 deletion provides satisfactory outcomes and decreases the number of surgeries. Preoperative planning must be conducted carefully and needs to be individualized to be successful.

Superiorly based pharyngeal flap for treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency in patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.

BACKGROUND: There are no previous blinded studies for comparison of preoperative versus postoperative perceptual speech assessments when using a pharyngeal flap for treating velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) in patients diagnosed with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of superiorly based pharyngeal flap surgery on speech in these patients using blinded judgments of experienced speech therapists. METHODS: A retrospective study of 12 consecutive patients who had undergone pharyngeal flap surgery for treatment of VPI between 2002 and 2009 was conducted. Seven girls and 5 boys between 4 and 15 (median, 6) years old at the time of surgery were included in the study. Six patients were born with a submucous cleft palate (including 2 occult), and 1 patient, with an overt cleft palate. The remaining 5 patients had no signs of a palatal pathology. All palatal clefts had been repaired before pharyngeal flap surgery except in 2 patients with occult submucous cleft palate. Preoperative and postoperative audio recordings were blinded for scoring independently by 3 senior speech therapists. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in hypernasality (P = 0.002), audible nasal emission (P = 0.033), weak pressure consonants (P = 0.008), and speech intelligibility (P = 0.021) after pharyngeal flap surgery. Hyponasality did not develop significantly with surgery. One patient was diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea. CONCLUSIONS: Superiorly based pharyngeal flap resulted in a significant speech improvement in 12 consecutive patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome having VPI.

Speech and hearing in adults with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.

The purpose of the study was to investigate the prevalence of velopharyngeal impairment, compensatory articulation, reduced intelligibility, and to rate the general impression of speech in adults with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. The second purpose was to study the prevalence and type of hearing impairment in these adults. A referred, consecutive series of 24 adults with confirmed 22q11.2 deletion, 16 female and 8 males, with a mean age of 25 years (19-38 years) was included in the study. A blind assessment of speech by three experienced speech-language pathologists was performed. Sixteen (66%) patients had a mild to severe velopharyngeal impairment. The most prevalent symptoms of velopharygeal impairment were hypernasality and audible nasal airflow. The mean nasalance score was 33% (6-66%). Only two patients had disordered articulation; one of these had glottal articulation. A mean of 96% (88-100%) of single words were rated to be intelligible. To achieve these results half of the patients previously had velopharyngeal flap surgery. Forty-one percent (9/22) had mild-moderate hearing impairment; three had sensorineural type, four conductive and two had a mixed type. In conclusion the majority of the patients had no articulation errors and good intelligibility; while one-third still had moderate to severe problems with velopharyngeal impairment. Around 40% still had some hearing impairment, in most cases with a mild to moderate conductive component. Thus, a high prevalence of speech and hearing problems seems to be a part of the phenotype in adults with 22q11.2DS.

In search of the optimal surgical treatment for velopharyngeal dysfunction in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Patients with the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22qDS) and velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) tend to have residual VPD following surgery. This systematic review seeks to determine whether a particular surgical procedure results in superior speech outcome or less morbidity. METHODOLOGY/ PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A combined computerized and hand-search yielded 70 studies, of which 27 were deemed relevant for this review, reporting on a total of 525 patients with 22qDS and VPD undergoing surgery for VPD. All studies were levels 2c or 4 evidence. The methodological quality of these studies was assessed using criteria based on the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias. Heterogeneous groups of patients were reported on in the studies. The surgical procedure was often tailored to findings on preoperative imaging. Overall, 50% of patients attained normal resonance, 48% attained normal nasal emissions scores, and 83% had understandable speech postoperatively. However, 5% became hyponasal, 1% had obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and 17% required further surgery. There were no significant differences in speech outcome between patients who underwent a fat injection, Furlow or intravelar veloplasty, pharyngeal flap pharyngoplasty, Honig pharyngoplasty, or sphincter pharyngoplasty or Hynes procedures. There was a trend that a lower percentage of patients attained normal resonance after a fat injection or palatoplasty than after the more obstructive pharyngoplasties (11-18% versus 44-62%, p = 0.08). Only patients who underwent pharyngeal flaps or sphincter pharyngoplasties incurred OSA, yet this was not statistically significantly more often than after other procedures (p = 0.25). More patients who underwent a palatoplasty needed further surgery than those who underwent a pharyngoplasty (50% versus 7-13%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS/ SIGNIFICANCE: In the heterogeneous group of patients with 22qDS and VPD, a grade C recommendation can be made to minimize the morbidity of further surgery by choosing to perform a pharyngoplasty directly instead of only a palatoplasty.

Impact of 22q deletion syndrome on speech outcomes following primary surgery for submucous cleft palate.

BACKGROUND: Patients with 22q deletion syndrome are at increased risk of submucous cleft palate and velopharyngeal insufficiency. The authors' aim is to evaluate speech outcomes following primary Furlow palatoplasty or pharyngeal flap for correction of velopharyngeal insufficiency in submucous cleft palate patients with and without 22q deletion syndrome. METHODS: Records of submucous cleft palate patients who underwent primary surgery between 2001 and 2010 were reviewed. Data included 22q deletion syndrome diagnosis, age at surgery, procedure, preoperative nasopharyngoscopy and nasometry, speech outcomes, complications, and secondary surgery rates. RESULTS: Seventy-eight submucous cleft palate patients were identified. Twenty-three patients had 22q deletion syndrome. Fewer 22q deletion syndrome patients obtained normal resonance on perceptual assessment compared with nonsyndromic patients (74 percent versus 88 percent). A similar difference existed based on postoperative nasometric scores. Among 22q deletion syndrome patients, similar success rates were achieved with Furlow palatoplasty and pharyngeal flap. No difference in the proportion improved postoperatively was noted between 22q deletion syndrome and nonsyndromic groups. One complication was experienced per group. More revision operations were indicated in the 22q deletion syndrome group (17 percent) compared with the nonsyndromic group (4 percent). Median times to normal resonance for 22q deletion syndrome and nonsyndromic patients were 150 weeks and 34 weeks, respectively. Adjusting for multiple variables, 22q deletion syndrome patients were 3.6 times less likely to develop normal resonance. CONCLUSION: Careful selection of Furlow palatoplasty or pharyngeal flap for primary repair of submucous cleft palate is highly effective in 22q deletion syndrome patients and yields results approaching those of nonsyndromic patients. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Velopharyngeal dysfunction and 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: a longitudinal study of functional outcome and preoperative prognostic factors.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the effect of time after velopharyngoplasty on outcome and to search for preoperative prognostic factors for residual hypernasality in patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary hospital. PATIENTS: Patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome and velopharyngeal dysfunction who underwent a primary (modified) Honig velopharyngoplasty between 1989 and 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinically obtained perceptual and instrumental measurements of resonance, nasalance, and understandability before and after velopharyngoplasty. RESULTS: Data were available for 44 of 54 patients (81% follow-up), with a mean follow-up time of 7.0 years (range, 1.0 to 19.4 years). During follow-up, 24 (55%) patients attained normal resonance and 20 (45%) had residual hypernasality or underwent revision surgery. Mean postoperative nasalance and understandability scores were closer to the norm than mean preoperative scores were (2.0 versus 5.5 standard deviations for the normal passage, 1.3 versus 8.1 standard deviations for the nonnasal passage, and score 2.3 versus 4.1 understandability). Serial measurements revealed that hypernasality only resolved an average of 5 years after surgery, and three patients whose resonance initially normalized later relapsed to hypernasality. Gender, age at surgery, lateral pharyngeal wall adduction, velar elevation, presence of a palatal defect, previous intravelar veloplasty, nasalance, understandability, adenoidectomy, hearing loss, and IQ were not able to predict poor outcome following primary velopharyngoplasty (all p > .05). CONCLUSIONS: In this chart review of patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome and velopharyngeal dysfunction, residual hypernasality persisted in many patients after velopharyngoplasty. None of the preoperative factors that were studied had prognostic value for the outcome.

Use of array comparative genome hybridization in orofacial clefting.

Orofacial clefting is a common condition found in 1 per 700 to 1 per 1000 births. Although most cases are isolated, a subset is caused by a specific genetic mutation. Specific gene tests have been used for recognizable syndromes such as velocardiofacial syndrome or van der Woude syndrome, where the cleft is associated with other anomalies. However, many cleft lip and palate patients have other anomalies but do not fit in to a recognizable syndrome. For these patients, chromosome analysis has been a first-line genetic test; however, in the past few years, a new form of genetic testing has become available for these patients: array comparative genome hybridization (aCGH). We present a 7-month-old male infant with cleft palate, developmental delay, and a family history of velopharyngeal insufficiency in whom aCGH array was used to identify a small deletion on the short (p) arm of chromosome 7. This defect, which was also found in the mother, was undetected by chromosome analysis. In summary, this case demonstrates that aCGH is a new diagnostic tool that is useful in the evaluation of select cases of orofacial clefting. Array comparative genome hybridization should be considered when the suspicion for a genetic etiology of the clefting remains strong despite a normal cytogenetic analysis.

Utilization of three-dimensional computed tomography for craniofacial phenotypic analysis in children with velocardiofacial syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze variants of the craniofacial phenotypes in children with velocardiofacial syndrome (VCFS) and children with cleft palates with a new protocol of landmarks using a three-dimensional computed tomography (CT)-reconstructed model in a cross-sectional group experimental design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present a retrospectively reviewed case series of 21 patients with VCFS, verified by short-tandem repeat techniques, and 20 children with cleft palate with age- and sex-matched controls from the Craniofacial Cleft Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the 9th Shanghai People's Hospital. The records during the period between January 2005 and December 2008 were analyzed. The sample population of 41 children in this study was scanned with spiral CT. These images were reconstructed into three-dimensional models by SimPlant 11.2 and were analyzed with a new protocol of landmarks to test the variants of craniofacial phenotypes. RESULTS: All of the children with VCFS demonstrated velopharyngeal incompetence and craniofacial deformities. Measurements in the standard coordinate system demonstrated significant shorter cranial base, cervical vertebrae, longer maxilla height, and palatal angle. For the velopharyngeal variants, greater depth but lesser width of the pharyngeal cavity was shown in the VCFS group. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional CT can provide precise data on craniofacial variants in children with distinctive morphologic features of VCFS.

Velopharyngoplasty for noncleft velopharyngeal insufficiency: results in relation to 22q11 microdeletion.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of velopharyngoplasty for velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) in relation to 22q11 deletion or nonsyndromic VPI. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: Eleven of 45 patients with 22q11 microdeletion (group 1) and 9 patients without 22q11 microdeletion (group 2) with noncleft VPI (hypoplastic velum or hypodynamic velopharynx and deep pharynx) underwent velopharyngoplasty (midline pharyngeal flap with superior pedicle). Exclusion criteria included cleft palate, submucous cleft palate, all syndromic cases, and all associated malformations (except those related to 22q11 microdeletion in patients with DiGeorge syndrome). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech assessment before surgery using the Borel-Maisonny scale and at 9 months and 24 months after surgery. Velopharyngeal insufficiency was classified as normal, inconsistent, mild, moderate, and severe. RESULTS: Before surgery, in group 1, 3 patients had mild and 8 had severe VPI, and in group 2, 1 had mild and 8 had severe VPI. Postoperative outcomes at 9 months showed that in group 1, 2 patients had excellent results (normal and inconsistent) and 9 had mild VPI, while in group 2, 6 patients had excellent results and 3 had mild VPI (P = .03). Postoperative outcomes at 24 months showed that in group 1, 10 patients had excellent results and 1 had mild VPI, while in group 2, 8 patients had excellent results and 1 had mild VPI. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment of noncleft VPI by pharyngoplasty was efficient in 10 of the 11 patients (91%) in the 22q11 group and in 8 of the 9 patients (89%) in the nonsyndromic group. Postoperative remission took longer for patients with the 22q11 microdeletion than for the control group. However, long-term results following surgical treatment were equally good in the 2 groups.

Velopharyngeal insufficiency clinic: the first 18 months.

OBJECTIVES: To profile the presentation and management of patients seen at a velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) clinic and to explore the role of commonly used investigations in the workup of VPI. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Tertiary care VPI clinic. METHODS: A computerized database created at the time of patient assessment was accessed to review 75 patients seen over an 18-month span. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptive analysis of patient demographics, presenting complaints, pathophysiology, and treatment. The incidence of chromosome 22q microdeletion in patients presenting to such a clinic was also determined. RESULTS: The most common etiology was persistent VPI following prior cleft palate surgery. Eleven percent of presenting patients were identified with 22q microdeletion by fluorescent in situ hybridization testing. CONCLUSIONS: VPI is the result of a wide number of etiologies, with a high incidence of 22q microdeletion identified. Routine genetic testing in VPI clinics is advocated.

Evaluation of potential modifiers of the palatal phenotype in the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate potential modifiers of the palatal phenotype in individuals with the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. DESIGN: Data from 356 subjects enrolled in a study of the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome were used to evaluate potential modifiers of the palatal phenotype. Specifically, subjects with and without velopharyngeal inadequacy and/or structural malformations of the palate were compared with respect to gender, race, and genotype for variants of seven genes that may influence palatal development. METHODS: The chi-square test or Fisher exact test was used to evaluate the association between palatal phenotype and each potential modifier. Odds ratios and their associated 95% confidence intervals were used to measure the magnitude of the association between palatal phenotype, subject gender and race, and each of the bi-allelic variants. RESULTS: The palatal phenotype observed in individuals with the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome was significantly associated with both gender and race. In addition, there was tentative evidence that the palatal phenotype may be influenced by variation within the gene that encodes methionine synthase. CONCLUSIONS: Variation in the palatal phenotype observed between individuals with the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome may be related to personal characteristics such as gender and race as well as variation within genes that reside outside of the 22q11.2 region.

The Pittsburgh Oral-Facial Cleft study: expanding the cleft phenotype. Background and justification.

The Pittsburgh Oral-Facial Cleft study was begun in 1993 with the primary goal of identifying genes involved in nonsyndromic orofacial clefts in a variety of populations worldwide. Based on the results from a number of pilot studies and preliminary genetic analyses, a new research focus was added to the Pittsburgh Oral-Facial Cleft study in 1999: to elucidate the role that associated phenotypic features play in the familial transmission patterns of orofacial clefts in order to expand the definition of the nonsyndromic cleft phenotype. The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review of phenotypic features associated with nonsyndromic orofacial clefts. These features include fluctuating and directional asymmetry, non-right-handedness, dermatoglyphic patterns, craniofacial morphology, orbicularis oris muscle defects, dental anomalies, structural brain and vertebral anomalies, minor physical anomalies, and velopharyngeal incompetence.

Velopharyngeal insufficiency following adenoidectomy.

Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) is a well recognized but rare complication of adenoidectomy. Twenty children with this condition were seen and assessed at Great Ormond Street Hospital between 1993 and 2000. The commonest aetiology was occult submucous cleft palate (n = 5) but there was a wide range of other causes. Two children with severe behavioural disorders and normal palates developed mild symptoms, an aetiology not previously reported. Only two children had a classical submucous cleft palate. Nine children required surgical intervention and three revision procedures. Of the 15 treated children for whom follow-up data was available, 13 regained normal or near-normal speech. Many cases of postadenoidectomy VPI was not foreseeable. Following referral to a specialist cleft unit, normal or near-normal speech can be achieved in the majority with a combination of surgery and speech therapy.