ART and AutoART ECAP measurements and cochlear nerve anatomy as predictors in adult cochlear implant recipients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective study is to compare the results of electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) measurements using automatic auditory response telemetry (AutoART) with those obtained by ART in adults. The study also aimed to evaluate the predictive value of intraoperative ART and AutoART ECAPs for speech intelligibility (SI) and hearing success (HS), and to determine if cochlear nerve (CN) cross-sectional area (CSA) obtained preoperatively by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans could predict ART and AutoART ECAPs and SI and HS outcome. METHODS: The study analyzed and correlated ART and AutoART ECAP thresholds at electrodes E2, E6, and E10, as well as averaged ECAP thresholds over electrodes E1-E12, using data from 32 implants. Correlations were also examined for ART and AutoART ECAP slopes. In addition, averaged ART and AutoART ECAP thresholds and slopes over all 12 electrodes for each participant were correlated with CN CSA measured from MRI sequences. SI of the monosyllabic Freiburg Speech Test at 65 dB sound pressure level was examined along with averaged ART and AutoART thresholds and slopes over all 12 electrodes. A parallel analysis was performed for HS, derived from the difference between baseline and 6-month SI. Finally, correlations between CN CSA and SI, as well as CN CSA and HS were examined. RESULTS: The results of the study showed a significant positive correlation between ART and AutoART ECAP thresholds and as well as slopes for E2, E6, E10 and averaged thresholds and slopes of E1-E12. However, no significant correlation was observed between ART and AutoART averaged ECAP thresholds and slopes and either SI and HS or CN CSA. Furthermore, no significant correlation was found between CN CSA and SI and HS. CONCLUSION: While AutoART is a reliable and safe program for measuring ECAPs in adults, the study found no preoperative prognostic information on intraoperative ECAP results using parameters extracted from current MRI sequences or pre-/intraoperative information on subsequent hearing outcome using ECAP and CN CSA.

Long-term effects of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation on speech in Parkinson's disease.

Bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is an effective treatment in advanced Parkinson's Disease (PD). However, the effects of STN-DBS on speech are still debated, particularly in the long-term follow-up. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of bilateral STN-DBS on speech in a cohort of advanced PD patients treated with bilateral STN-DBS. Each patient was assessed before surgery through a neurological evaluation and a perceptual-acoustic analysis of speech and re-assessed in the long-term in different stimulation and drug conditions. The primary outcome was the percentage change of speech intelligibility obtained by comparing the postoperative on-stimulation/off-medication condition with the preoperative off-medication condition. Twenty-five PD patients treated with bilateral STN-DBS with a 5-year follow-up were included. In the long-term, speech intelligibility stayed at the same level as preoperative values when compared with preoperative values. STN-DBS induced a significant acute improvement of speech intelligibility (p < 0.005) in the postoperative assessment when compared to the on-stimulation/off-medication and off-stimulation/off-medication conditions. These results highlight that STN-DBS may handle speech intelligibility even in the long-term.

Copresence Was Found to Be Related to Some Pupil Measures in Persons With Hearing Loss While They Performed a Speech-in-Noise Task.

OBJECTIVES: To assess if a manipulation of copresence was related to speech-in-noise task performance, arousal, and effort of persons with hearing loss. Task-related arousal and effort were measured by means of pupillometry. DESIGN: Twenty-nine participants (mean age: 64.6 years) with hearing loss (4-frequency pure-tone average [4F-PTA] of 50.2 dB HL [SD = 8.9 dB] in the right ear and 51.3 dB HL [SD = 8.7 dB] in the left ear; averaged across 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) listened to and repeated spoken Danish sentences that were masked by four streams of continuous speech. Participants were presented with blocks of 20 sentences, during which copresence was manipulated by having participants do the task either alone or accompanied by two observers who were recruited from a similar age group. The task was presented at two difficulty levels, which was accomplished by fixing the signal-to-noise ratio of the speech and masker to match the thresholds at which participants were estimated to correctly repeat 50% (difficult) or 80% (easy) of the sentences in a block. Performance was assessed based on whether or not sentences were repeated correctly. Measures of pupil size (baseline pupil size [BPS], peak pupil dilation [PPD], and mean pupil dilation [MPD]) were used to index arousal and effort. Participants also completed ratings of subjective effort and stress after each block of sentences and a self-efficacy for listening-questionnaire. RESULTS: Task performance was not associated with copresence, but was found to be related to 4F-PTA. An increase in BPS was found for copresence conditions, compared to alone conditions. Furthermore, a post-hoc exploratory analysis revealed that the copresence conditions were associated with a significantly larger pupil size in the second half of the task-evoked pupil response (TEPR). No change in PPD or MPD did was detected between copresence and alone conditions. Self-efficacy, 4F-PTA, and age were not found to be related to the pupil data. Subjective ratings were sensitive to task difficulty but not copresence. CONCLUSION: Copresence was not found to be related to speech-in-noise performance, PPD, or MPD in persons with HL but was associated with an increase in arousal (as indicated by a larger BPS). This could be related to premobilization of effort and/or discomfort in response to the observers' presence. Furthermore, an exploratory analysis of the pupil data showed that copresence was associated with greater pupil dilations in the second half of the TEPR. This may indicate that participants invested more effort during the speech-in-noise task while in the presence of the observers, but that this increase in effort may not necessarily have been related to listening itself. Instead, other speech-in-noise task-related processes, such as preparing to respond, could have been influenced by copresence.

Complications and outcomes of cochlear implantation in children younger than 12 months: A multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES: Evidence suggests that Cochlear Implantation (CI) is a beneficial approach for auditory and speech skills improvement in children with severe to profound hearing loss. However, it remains controversial if implantation in children <12 months is safe and effective compared to older children. The present study aimed to determine whether children's ages affect surgical complications and auditory and speech development. METHODS: The current multicenter study enrolled 86 children who underwent CI surgery at <12 months of age (group A) and 362 children who underwent implantation between 12 and 24 months of age (group B). The Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scores were determined pre-impanation, and "one-year" and "two-year" post-implantation. RESULTS: All children had full insertions of the electrode array. Four complications (overall rate: 4.65%; three minor) occurred in group A and 12 complications (overall rate: 4.41%; nine minor) occurred in group B. We found no statistically significant difference in the complication rates between the groups (p > 0.05). The mean SIR and CAP scores improved over time following CI activation in both groups. However, we did not find significant differences in CAP and SIR scores between the groups across different time points. CONCLUSION: Cochlear implantation in children younger than 12 months is a safe and efficient procedure, providing substantial auditory and speech benefits. Furthermore, rates and nature of minor and major complications in infants are similar to those of children undergoing the CI at an older age.

Long-Term Auditory and Speech Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Children With Cochlear Nerve Aplasia.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to (1) review the long-term outcomes of cochlear implantation in children with cochlear nerve aplasia and (2) compare the development of their auditory and speech abilities to children with normal-sized cochlear nerves. DESIGN: This is a retrospective case-control study. Patients who underwent unilateral cochlear implant (CI) surgery in a tertiary referral center from September 2012 to December 2018 were reviewed. The study group included 55 children with cochlear nerve aplasia diagnosed using preoperative images. The control group included 35 children with normal-sized cochlear nerves. The control group did not differ from the study group in terms of age at implantation, pre-implantation auditory and speech abilities, or the electrode array type. Cochlear implantation outcomes were assessed using a test battery, including the Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) score, the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) score, behavioral audiometry, and closed- or open-set speech recognition tests. The development of auditory and speech abilities was compared between the two groups using Generalized Linear Mixed-effect Models. RESULTS: The mean duration of CI usage was 4.5 years (SD = 1.5, range = 2.0 to 9.5) in the study group. The CAP scores, SIR scores, and aided hearing thresholds improved significantly post-implantation in the study group, but were significantly poorer than those in the control group. Generalized Linear Mixed-effect Models showed that the development of CAP and SIR scores was significantly slower in the study group than in the control group. Overall, 27 (49%) children with cochlear nerve aplasia had some degree of open-set speech perception skills, but the monosyllabic and bisyllabic word recognition rates were significantly lower than those in the control group. CONCLUSION: For children with cochlear nerve aplasia, auditory perception and speech intelligibility continued to improve in the long-term follow-up, but this progress was significantly slower than in children with normal-sized cochlear nerves. Most children with cochlear nerve aplasia could obtain the ability of common phrase perception and understanding simple spoken language with consistent CI usage and auditory rehabilitation.

Outcomes of cochlear implantation in children with Usher syndrome: a long-term observation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate auditory performance and speech intelligibility of children with Usher syndrome up to 10 years after cochlear implantation. METHODS: Thirty-five children with USH were compared to 46 non-syndromic patients regarding age at implantation. Auditory performance and speech intelligibility was assessed with standard tools. Genetic counseling, vestibular tests, imaging studies, and ophthalmological findings were evaluated, depending on the availability. RESULTS: The mean age of implantation in USH children was 6.3 years (SD 4.6, range 0.3-17.6 years). Post-implantation values of the studied parameters were compared between USH and NS children and presented as follows: PTA = 25.0 dB HL vs. 28.4, CAP = 5.3 vs. 5.1, SIR = 4.1 vs. 3.9, MAIS = 82.3% vs. 80.5%, MUSS = 81.8% vs. 76.6%. There were no statistically significant differences between the USH and NS groups (p > 0.005). USH patients reached a higher score ceiling earlier compared to NS patients. Children implanted before 3 years of age achieved significantly higher results than older children in USH and NS groups (p < 0.005). In all patients with USH, the electroretinogram was abnormal. Vestibular examination was abnormal in 29 of 31 patients with USH1. Imaging studies revealed no inner ear or auditory nerve anomalies in patients with USH. CONCLUSION: Cochlear implantation successfully improves auditory performance and speech intelligibility in patients with USH, especially those implanted under 3 years of age. The electroretinogram is the only reliable test to establish a diagnosis of USH. Logopedic outcomes are associated with early implantation, and early diagnosis of USH contributes to optimizing speech therapy.

The Outcome of Cochlear Implantations in Deaf-Blind Patients: A Multicenter Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: This multicenter study aimed to evaluate the auditory and speech outcomes of cochlear implantation (CI) in deaf-blind patients compared with deaf-only patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Multiple cochlear implant centers. PATIENTS: The current study was conducted on 17 prelingual deaf-blind children and 12 postlingual deaf-blind adults who underwent CI surgery. As a control group, 17 prelingual deaf children and 12 postlingual deaf adults were selected. INTERVENTION: Cochlear implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Auditory and linguistic performances in children were assessed using the categories of auditory performance (CAP) and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scales, respectively. The word recognition score (WRS) was also used to measure speech perception ability in adults. The mean CAP, SIR, and WRS cores were compared between the deaf-only and deaf-blind groups before CI surgery and at "12 months" and "24 months" after device activation. Cohen's d was used for effect size estimation. RESULTS: We found no significant differences in the mean CAP and SIR scores between the deaf-blind and deaf-only children before the CI surgery. For both groups, SIR and CAP scores improved with increasing time after the device activation. The mean CAP scores in the deaf-only children were either equivalent or slightly higher than those of the deaf-blind children at "12 months post-CI" (3.94 ± 0.74 vs 3.24 ± 1.25; mean difference score, 0.706) and "24 months post-CI" (6.01 ± 0.79 vs 5.47 ± 1.06; mean difference score, 0.529) time intervals, but these differences were not statistically significant. The SIR scores in deaf-only implanted children were, on average, 0.870 scores greater than the deaf-blind children at "12 months post-CI" (2.94 ± 0.55 vs 2.07 ± 1.4; p = 0.01, d = 0.97) and, on average, 1.067 scores greater than deaf-blind children at "24 months post-CI" (4.35 ± 0.49 vs 3.29 ± 1.20; p = 0.002; d = 1.15) time intervals. We also found an improvement in WRS scores from the "preimplantation" to the "12-month post-CI" and "24-month post-CI" time intervals in both groups. Pairwise comparisons indicated that the mean WRS in the deaf-only adults was, on average, 10.61% better than deaf-blind implanted adults at "12 months post-CI" (62.33 ± 9.09% vs 51.71 ± 10.73%, p = 0.034, d = 1.06) and, on average, 15.81% better than deaf-blind adults at "24-months post-CI" (72.67 ± 8.66% vs 56.8 ± 9.78%, p = 0.002, d = 1.61) follow-ups. CONCLUSION: Cochlear implantation is a beneficial method for the rehabilitation of deaf-blind patients. Both deaf-blind and deaf-only implanted children revealed similar auditory performances. However, speech perception ability in deaf-blind patients was slightly lower than the deaf-only patients in both children and adults.

Perceptual Voice and Speech Analysis after Supraglottic Laryngeal Closure for Chronic Aspiration in Head and Neck Cancer.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate the voice and speech outcomes after tubed supraglottic laryngeal closure (TSLC) surgery to treat chronic aspiration after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective case-control study. METHODS: The data of patients who underwent radiotherapy for head and neck cancer and who later required total laryngectomy or TSLC for chronic aspiration between 2004 and 2017 were retrieved from a dysphagia clinic. Preoperative and postoperative voice and speech were assessed by the GRBAS and INFVo rating scales. Control subjects who underwent radiotherapy alone or total laryngectomy with a tracheoesophageal prosthesis for other indications were recruited for comparison. RESULTS: Of 15 patients who underwent a TSLC with a mean age of 57.3 years (45-75 years), 13 were male and 2 female. All patients had a history of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The success rate of speech production using their own larynx following an intact TSLC was 64%. There was no statistically significant difference in voice and speech ratings between preoperative and TSLC subjects on the GRBAS (P = .32) and INFVo scales (P = .57), although the quality of voice appeared to deteriorate after TSLC. However, the INFVo scale for impression, intelligibility and unsteadiness of the voice after TSLC was statistically significantly better than for laryngectomy with tracheoesophageal speech. CONCLUSIONS: A tubed supraglottic laryngeal closure controls chronic aspiration while preserving the larynx for phonation, and results in a better voice and speech quality than a laryngectomy with a voice prosthesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:E1616-E1623, 2021.

Testes de fala no ruído na clínica audiológica - Uma Revisão Integrativa / Noise speech tests in the audiological clinic - An Integrative Review

Introdução: A audiometria convencional não é suficientemente confiável para prever a compreensão de uma pessoa num ambiente ruidoso e, desta forma, inserir testes de fala no ruído na rotina clínica audiológica pode ser uma ferramenta útil para detectar possíveis problemas da função auditiva central. Objetivo: Realizar uma revisão integrativa da literatura sobre testes de fala no ruído disponíveis para uso na clínica audiológica. Método: Busca de publicações sem delimitação temporal nos bancos de dados Lilacs, PubMed, Medline, IBCS e SciELO, utilizando-se como descritores: teste de fala no ruído, percepção auditiva, testes de discriminação auditiva, distúrbios auditivos, padronização, desenvolvimento, validação, testes do limiar de recepção da fala, percepção auditiva e perda auditiva. Não houve exclusão por período de publicação. Os artigos foram pesquisados nos meses de junho e julho de 2017. Resultados: Foram localizados um total de 1200 artigos e 39 foram inseridos nesta revisão integrativa por satisfazerem os critérios de inclusão. Nos artigos selecionados, foram localizados 25 materiais diferentes que utilizaram para avaliação de fala no ruído: sílabas, palavras, sentenças, dígitos e associação de palavras e tonalidade e palavras e sentenças. Os tipos de ruídos empregados foram: espectro de fala, ruído tipo babble, ruído branco e ruído estacionário e tais materiais foram desenvolvidos para uso em adultos e/ou crianças e sujeitos com e/ou sem perda auditiva. Conclusão: Todos os autores relataram a importância de inserir testes de fala no ruído na rotina clínica, já que só a audiometria convencional não prevê a compreensão de fala em ambiente ruidoso.

Introduction: Conventional audiometry is not reliable enough to predict a person's understanding in a noisy environment, so inserting speech noise tests into the audiological clinical routine can be a useful tool for detecting possible central auditory function problems. Objective: To conduct an integrative literature review on noise speech tests available for use in the audiological clinic. Method: Search for publications without temporal delimitation in the Lilacs, PubMed, Medline, IBCS and SciELO databases, using the following keywords: Noise speech test, auditory perception, auditory discrimination tests, hearing disorders, standardization, development, validation, speech reception threshold tests, hearing perception and hearing loss. There was no exclusion by publication period. The articles were searched in June and July 2017. Results: A total of 1200 articles were found and 39 were included in this integrative review because they met the inclusion criteria. In the selected articles, 25 different materials were used to evaluate speech in noise: syllables, words, sentences, digits and association of words and tone and words and sentences. The types of noise used were: speech spectrum, babble noise, white noise and stationary noise and these materials were developed for use in adults and / or children and subjects with and / or without hearing loss. Conclusion: All authors reported the importance of inserting speech tests in noise into the clinical routine, since only conventional audiometry does not predict speech comprehension in noisy environment.

Introducción: La audiometría convencional no es confiable para predecir la comprensión de una persona en entorno ruidoso, por lo que insertar pruebas de ruido del habla en la rutina audiológica puede ser una herramienta útil para detectar posibles problemas de la función auditiva central. Objetivo: realizar una revisión integral de literatura sobre las pruebas de ruido en el habla disponibles para su uso en la clínica audiológica. Método: Búsqueda de publicaciones sin delimitación temporal en las bases de datos Lilacs, PubMed, Medline, IBCS y SciELO, utilizando las palabras clave: prueba de ruido, percepción auditiva, pruebas de discriminación auditiva, trastornos auditivos, estandarización, desarrollo, validación , pruebas de umbral de recepción del habla, percepción auditiva y pérdida auditiva. No hubo exclusión por período de publicación. Se buscaron los artículos en junio y julio de 2017. Resultados: se encontraron un total de 1200 artículos y se incluyeron 39 en esta revisión porque cumplían con los criterios de inclusión. En los artículos seleccionados, se utilizaron 25 materiales diferentes para evaluar el habla en ruido: sílabas, palabras, oraciones, dígitos y asociación de palabras y tonos y oraciones. Tipos de ruido utilizados: espectro del habla, ruido de balbuceo, ruido blanco y ruido estacionario, y estos materiales se desarrollaron para su uso en adultos y/o niños y sujetos con y/o sin pérdida auditiva. Conclusión: Todos los autores informaron la importancia de insertar pruebas de habla en ruido en la rutina clínica, ya que solo la audiometría convencional no predice la comprensión del habla en entornos ruidosos.

Longitudinal Speech Change After Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease Patients: A 2-Year Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Speech disorders are among the most common adverse effects after subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. However, longitudinal speech changes after STN-DBS are not fully understood. OBJECTIVE: We performed a two-year prospective study on PD patients who underwent STN-DBS and analyzed changes in speech function to clarify factors predicting for speech deterioration. METHODS: Twenty-five PD patients were assessed before and up to two years after STN implantation. Speech function was evaluated in the on-stimulation condition and 30 min after stimulation cessation using auditory-perceptual assessment. Patients who experienced overall worsening in speech intelligibility or naturalness ≥1 point during follow-up were classified into a deteriorated group (n = 16), with the remaining subjects being classified into a stable group (n = 9). Cognitive and motor functions were also assessed. RESULTS: The stable group had significantly better values of low volume, monoloudness, and asthenic voice subscores of the auditory-perceptual assessment in the on-stimulation condition compared with the off-stimulation condition. Imprecise consonants, excess loudness variation, and strained voice subscores were improved via cessation of stimulation in both groups. Before surgery, the deteriorated group had significantly lower scores in the Stroop Color-Word Test and Digit Span compared to the stable group. CONCLUSIONS: During follow-up, some subscores showed significant worsening in the on-stimulation condition in both groups. However, beneficial effects of STN-DBS on speech appeared to counterbalance negative effects of STN-DBS on speech function only in the stable group. Worse cognitive function may be a potential predictor for speech deterioration after STN-DBS in PD patients.

Speech intelligibility in patients with oral cancer: An objective baseline evaluation of pretreatment function and impairment.

BACKGROUND: This study seeks to identify those factors that influence the pre-therapeutic speech intelligibility in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). METHOD: A group of 172 patients (125 males, 47 females, mean age = 61 ± 11 a) with different OSCC stages ranging from T1 to T4 and N0 to N2 was examined for their speech intelligibility using a computerized measuring tool, and compared to a healthy reference group (30 males, 10 females, mean age = 59 ± 12 a). RESULTS: It was found that the pre-therapeutic speech intelligibility in patients with OSCC is decreased when compared to a healthy collective. Two demographic factors that influence speech intelligibility could be identified: sex and age. It was determined that the only disease-related factor that influences speech intelligibility before therapy is the location of the tumor. CONCLUSION: The results of this study reveal that a preoperative speech intelligibility impairment in patients suffering from OSCC occurs independent of tumor stage, size of the tumor and infiltration status.

Speech development in young children with Mondini dysplasia who had undergone cochlear implantation.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the development of speech skills in young children with Mondini dysplasia and age-matched deaf children with radiologically normal inner ears over a period of 5 years after cochlear implantation (CI). METHODS: In total, 700 congenitally severely to profoundly deaf children (281 girls and 419 boys) participated in this study. All of the participants had undergone unilateral CI surgery before 36 months of age. The participants were categorized into two groups based on the absence or presence of Mondini dysplasia in the implanted ear, as assessed via high-resolution, thin-slice computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging: group A comprised 592 children with radiologically normal inner ears and group B comprised 108 children with Mondini dysplasia. The Meaningful Use of Speech Scale (MUSS) and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) were used to evaluate the speech performance of all young children at various time points: pre-surgery and at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months after switch-on programming. RESULTS: The mean scores of SIR and MUSS in children from both group A and group B showed significant improvements over time. No significant differences were found in the mean scores of SIR between the two groups at any time interval during the 5-year follow-up. The mean score of MUSS was significantly different between group A and group B at 12, 24, and 36 months after implantation, whereas no obvious differences were noted pre-surgery, and at 1, 3, 6, 48, and 60 months post-operation. CONCLUSIONS: Young children with Mondini dysplasia develop their speech skills at a fast rate and achieve similar speech acquisition compared to age-matched children with radiologically normal inner ears 5 years post-operation. Therefore, CI is an effective intervention method for young children with Mondini dysplasia.

Cochlear implantation in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder: A multicenter study on auditory performance and speech production outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the auditory performance and speech production outcome in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD). The effect of age on the outcomes of the surgery at the time of implantation was also evaluated. METHODS: Cochlear implantation was performed in 136 children with bilateral severe-to- profound hearing loss due to ANSD, at four tertiary academic centers. The patients were divided into two groups based on the age at the time of implantation; Group I: Children ≤24 months, and Group II: subjects >24 months. The categories of auditory performance (CAP) and speech intelligibility rating (SIR) scores were evaluated after the first and second years of implantation. The differences between the CAP and SIR scores in the two groups were assessed. RESULTS: The median CAP scores improved significantly after the cochlear implantation in all the patients (p value < 0.001). The improvement in the CAP scores during the first year in Group II was greater than Group I (p value: 0.007), but the improvement in CAP scores tended to be significantly higher in patients who were implanted at ≤24 months (p value < 0.001). There was no significant difference between two groups in SIR scores at first-year and second-year follow-ups. The evaluation of the SIR improvement revealed significantly higher values for Group I during the second-year follow-up (p value: 0.003). CONCLUSION: The auditory performance and speech production skills of the children with ANSD improved significantly after cochlear implantation, and this improvement was affected by age at the time of implantation.

Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus Parameter Optimization for Vowel Acoustics and Speech Intelligibility in Parkinson's Disease.

Purpose: The settings of 3 electrical stimulation parameters were adjusted in 12 speakers with Parkinson's disease (PD) with deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) to examine their effects on vowel acoustics and speech intelligibility. Method: Participants were tested under permutations of low, mid, and high STN-DBS frequency, voltage, and pulse width settings. At each session, participants recited a sentence. Acoustic characteristics of vowel production were extracted, and naive listeners provided estimates of speech intelligibility. Results: Overall, lower-frequency STN-DBS stimulation (60 Hz) was found to lead to improvements in intelligibility and acoustic vowel expansion. An interaction between speaker sex and STN-DBS stimulation was found for vowel measures. The combination of low frequency, mid to high voltage, and low to mid pulse width led to optimal speech outcomes; however, these settings did not demonstrate significant speech outcome differences compared with the standard clinical STN-DBS settings, likely due to substantial individual variability. Conclusions: Although lower-frequency STN-DBS stimulation was found to yield consistent improvements in speech outcomes, it was not found to necessarily lead to the best speech outcomes for all participants. Nevertheless, frequency may serve as a starting point to explore settings that will optimize an individual's speech outcomes following STN-DBS surgery. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.5899228.

Speech outcomes at 5 and 10 years of age after one-stage palatal repair with muscle reconstruction in children born with isolated cleft palate.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate speech outcomes in children with clefts in the hard and/or soft palate only (CPH/CPS), in order to determine the prevalence of cleft speech characteristics, the change between 5 and 10 years of age, and the difference in occurrence between CPH and CPS. METHODS: A consecutive series of 88 children born with CPH or CPS were included in a retrospective cohort. All participants were treated with one-stage palatal repair using a minimal incision technique with muscle reconstruction (mean age 13 months). Twelve children (14%) received a velopharyngeal flap. Cleft speech variables were rated at 5 and 10 years of age independently by three experienced external speech-language pathologists. Inter- and intra-rater agreements were determined, and the prevalence of cleft speech characteristics was calculated. RESULTS: Moderate-to-severe hypernasality and weak pressure consonants were present in 5%-10% of the children at 5 years, with marginal but statistically significant improvement at 10 years of age. Frequently or always occurring audible nasal air leakage was detected in 20% of children at age 5, and increased to ∼35% of the children at 10 years. Ten per cent had compensatory articulation at age 5, and 25% demonstrated s-distortions, whereas few had these problems at age 10. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate low occurrence of compensatory articulation problems in this cohort, even by 5 years of age. The high presence of symptoms of velopharyngeal insufficiency at 10 years of age suggests a need for additional secondary velopharyngeal surgery.

Digitised evaluation of speech intelligibility using vowels in maxillectomy patients.

Among the functional disabilities that patients face following maxillectomy, speech impairment is a major factor influencing quality of life. Proper rehabilitation of speech, which may include prosthodontic and surgical treatments and speech therapy, requires accurate evaluation of speech intelligibility (SI). A simple, less time-consuming yet accurate evaluation is desirable both for maxillectomy patients and the various clinicians providing maxillofacial treatment. This study sought to determine the utility of digital acoustic analysis of vowels for the prediction of SI in maxillectomy patients, based on a comprehensive understanding of speech production in the vocal tract of maxillectomy patients and its perception. Speech samples were collected from 33 male maxillectomy patients (mean age 57.4 years) in two conditions, without and with a maxillofacial prosthesis, and formant data for the vowels /a/,/e/,/i/,/o/, and /u/ were calculated based on linear predictive coding. The frequency range of formant 2 (F2) was determined by differences between the minimum and maximum frequency. An SI test was also conducted to reveal the relationship between SI score and F2 range. Statistical analyses were applied. F2 range and SI score were significantly different between the two conditions without and with a prosthesis (both P < .0001). F2 range was significantly correlated with SI score in both the conditions (Spearman's r = .843, P < .0001; r = .832, P < .0001, respectively). These findings indicate that calculating the F2 range from 5 vowels has clinical utility for the prediction of SI after maxillectomy.

Desempenho de crianças com distúrbios dos sons da fala no instrumento "Avaliação dinâmica das habilidades motoras da fala" / Performance of children with speech sound disorders in the dynamic evaluation of motor speech skills

RESUMO Objetivo Comparar o desempenho das crianças com aquisição de fala típica, desvio fonológico e com apraxia de fala na infância nas variáveis precisão de produção e consistência do instrumento "Avaliação dinâmica das habilidades motoras da fala" (DEMSS-BR). Método A amostra foi constituída por 18 crianças com idades entre 4 anos e 6 meses a 5 anos e 8 meses, de ambos os gêneros, divididas em três grupos: seis com aquisição típica de fala, seis com desvio fonológico e seis com apraxia de fala na infância. Todas foram avaliadas por meio do instrumento DEMSS-BR, e o desempenho foi observado a partir da análise das variáveis de precisão da produção e consistência da fala. Para comparação do desempenho entre grupos utilizou-se o teste U de Mann-Whitney. Resultados O grupo com apraxia de fala na infância apresentou desempenho inferior nas variáveis de precisão da produção e consistência da fala quando comparado aos demais grupos. Conclusão O grupo com apraxia de fala na infância apresentou pior desempenho no DEMSS-BR quando comparado aos de crianças típicas e com desvio fonológico. Desta forma, foi possível constatar que o DEMSS-BR auxilia no diagnóstico diferencial de crianças com distúrbios dos sons da fala.

ABSTRACT Purpose To compare performance between children with typical speech acquisition, phonological disorders, and childhood apraxia of speech for the variables overall articulatory accuracy and consistency of the Dynamic Evaluation of Motor Speech Skill - Brazilian Portuguese version (DEMSS-BR). Methods Study participants were 18 children of both genders aged 4 years and 6 months to 5 years and 8 months. The sample was divided into three groups: six children with typical speech acquisition (TSA), six children with phonological disorder (PD), and six individuals with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). All participants were submitted to the DEMSS-BR and had their subscores of speech accuracy and consistency measured. Performance comparison between the groups was statistically evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U Test. Results Participants in the group with CAS presented poorer performance for the variables overall articulatory accuracy and consistency compared with those of participants in the other two groups. Conclusion The group of children with childhood apraxia of speech presented poorer performance on the DEMSS-BR compared with those of the groups with typical speech acquisition and phonological disorders. The study demonstrated that the DEMSS-BR assists with differential diagnosis of children with speech sound disorders.

Sequential pediatric bilateral cochlear implantation: The effect of time interval between implants.

OBJECTIVE: To examine speech intelligibility in children subjected to sequential bilateral cochlear implants (CI) surgery and to assess the influence of the inter-stage interval duration. INTRODUCTION: Binaural hearing recovery can have additional benefits, especially in speech and language development in patients with congenital profound sensorineural hearing loss; so recently there has been an increase in the number of children receiving bilateral CI. METHODS: Twenty-seven children who underwent sequential bilateral cochlear implant (SBCI) with a short (1-3 yrs), medium (4-6 yrs) and long (7-12 yrs) range interval between both implantations, respectively, were evaluated. All patients underwent periodic speech perception test in quiet and noise after second implant activation in three conditions: with the first or second implant alone and with both implants. Results were examined according to the inter-stage interval. RESULTS: Speech intelligibility in noise was significantly better under bilateral conditions than either ear alone, in all three groups. Small improvements were seen in quiet, especially in the third group (6-12 yrs). CONCLUSION: Benefits of second implant in the early-implanted children and after a short inter-implant delay are more evident. However our study support that, even after a long period of deafness and despite a prolonged inter-stage interval, sequential bilateral cochlear implantation should be considered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.

La inteligibilidad vocal en las personas con laringectomía que se comunican con erigmofonía / The vocal intelligibilityin people withlaryngectomythat communicate with erygmophony

Las personas a las que se le ha realizado una laringectomía total y extirpado completamente su laringe ven alteradas en grado variable las funciones propias de ese órgano: esfinteriana, respiratoria y vocal. Respecto a esta última y su producto final: la voz, la pérdida es completa, por lo que es necesario rehabilitar dicha función para que la persona pueda comunicarse. El objetivo de este trabajo es valorar la inteligibilidad vocal de las personas laringectomizadas que hayan sido rehabilitadas con erigmofonía. Material y métodos: diseño prospectivo en 17 personas laringectomizadas que utilizan la voz erigmofónica para comunicarse. Se estudiaron con el VHI-30, espectrograma de banda estrecha, evaluación perceptual (GRABS y CAPE-V) y, de forma novedosa, valorando la inteligibilidad vocal a través de la lectura y reconocimiento de palabras bisílabas. Resultados: el VHI-30 muestra que las personas laringectomizadas perciben su voz como una limitación leve y moderada. El espectrograma presenta diferencias sustanciales entre la voz erigmofónica y la voz laríngea fisiológica. La evaluación perceptual indica una afectación moderada/severa en GRABS y media/grave en CAPE-V. En la inteligibilidad verbal predominan los valores medios-bajos (88 por ciento), pero hay pacientes con valores altos (12 por ciento). No se han encontrado relaciones estadísticamente significativas entre el VHI-30, la evaluación perceptual y la inteligibilidad verbal. Conclusiones: la valoración de la inteligibilidad de la voz erigmofónica proporciona al rehabilitador datos útiles y de fácil adquisición sobre la capacidad comunicativa de las personas con laringectomía total, que permiten complementar otros procedimientos de valoración objetiva (espectrograma) y subjetiva (VHI-30, GRABS y CAPE-V)

People who have had a total laryngectomy and have completely extirpated their larynx have, in a variable degree, altered the functions of this organ: sphincter, respiratory, and vocal. Regarding the latter and its final product: the voice, the loss is complete, so it is necessary to rehabilitate this function so that the person can communicate. The aim of this work is to evaluate the vocal intelligibility of laryngectomized individuals who have been rehabilitated with erygmophony. Material and method: prospective design in 17 laryngectomized individuals that use the erygmophonic voice to communicate. They were studied with VHI-30, narrow band spectrogram, perceptual evaluation (GRABS and CAPE-V) and, in a novel way, assessing the vocal intelligibility through the reading and recognition of bisyllabic words. Results: VHI-30 shows that laryngectomized individuals perceive their voice as a mild and moderate limitation. The spectrogram shows substantial differences between the erygmophonic voice and the laryngeal physiological voice. Perceptual evaluation indicates moderate/severe affectation in GRABS and medium/severe involvement in CAPE-V. In the verbal intelligibility, the medium-low values (88 percent) are predominant, but there are patients with high values (12 percent). No statistically significant relationships were found between VHI-30, perceptual evaluation, and verbal intelligibility. Conclusions: the evaluation of the intelligibility of the erygmophonic voice provides the rehabilitator with useful and easy-to-read data on the communicative capacity of persons with total laryngectomy, complementing other objective (spectrogram) and subjective assessment procedures (VHI-30, GRABS and CAPE-V)

Does cerebellar flocculus size affect subjective outcomes in pediatric auditory brainstem implantation.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of study was to 1) Describe relevant surgical anatomy in defining and accessing the lateral recess for placement of electrode, 2) Propose a working classification for grades of Flocculus; 3) To determine if different grades of cerebellar flocculus effects placement of ABI electrode and subjective outcomes in implantees. METHODS: Our study was a prospective study, and comprised of cohort of 12 patients who underwent ABI surgery via retrosigmoid approach between 1 Jan 2012 to 31 Dec 2014. All children with congenital profound sensorineural hearing loss with either absent cochlea or cochlear nerve were included in the study. Relevant anatomy was noted. We also noted down the difficulty encountered during the placement of ABI electrode. Auditory perception and speech intelligibility was scored post operatively for 1 year. RESULTS: Cerebellar flocculus was divided into 4 grades depending on the morphology of cerebellar flocculus. It was noted that Grade 3 & 4 flocculus (Group B) had difficult ABI electrode placement in comparison to Grade 1 & 2 flocculus (Group A). The subjective outcomes of Group A was better than Group B. However the p value was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Cerebellar flocculus can be graded depending on morphology and size. Flocculus of higher grades can make the placement of ABI electrodes difficult and adversely effects the postoperative subjective outcomes.