Ox-LDL aggravates contrast-induced injury of renal tubular epithelial cells.

Hypercholesterolemia can aggravate contrast-induced acute kidney injury, and the exacerbation of renal tubular epithelial cell (RTEC) injury is a major cause. However, the exact mechanisms remain obscure. Mitophagy, a type of autophagy, selectively eliminates damaged mitochondria and reduces mitochondrial oxidative stress, which is strongly implicated in cell homeostasis and acute kidney injury. Oxidized low-density lipoprotein (Ox-LDL) is accumulated in hypercholesterolemia and has a cytotoxic effect. This study aimed to determine whether and how ox-LDL exacerbates contrast-induced injury in RTECs and to further explore whether PINK1/Parkin-dependent mitophagy is involved in this process. Iohexol and ox-LDL were used alone or in combination to treat HK-2 cells. Rapamycin pretreatment was utilized to enhance mitophagy. Cell viability, apoptosis, mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) and mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mtROS) were detected by cell counting kit-8, TUNEL staining, JC-1 kit and MitoSOX fluorescence, respectively. The expression of mitophagy-related proteins (including PINK1, Parkin, and so on) and cleaved caspase-3 was confirmed by western blot. Colocalization of MitoTracker-labeled mitochondria and LysoTracker-labeled lysosomes was observed by fluorescence microscopy to evaluate mitophagy. The results of our study showed that ox-LDL aggravated MMP decline, mtROS release and apoptosis in iohexol-treated HK-2 cells, accompanied by a further increased autophagy level. Enhancement of PINK1/Parkin-dependent mitophagy by rapamycin alleviated apoptosis and mitochondrial injury in HK-2 cells in response to iohexol under ox-LDL condition. Therefore, our findings indicate that ox-LDL aggravates contrast-induced injury of RTECs by increasing mitochondrial damage and mitochondrial oxidative stress, which may be associated with the relative insufficiency of PINK1/Parkin-dependent mitophagy.

Rosiglitazone Alleviates Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Rats via the PPARγ/NLRP3 Signaling Pathway.

Background: This study investigated the effect and mechanism of rosiglitazone on a rat model with contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). Materials and Methods: The CI-AKI rat model was established from Sprague Dawley rats by furosemide injection (10 ml/kg) to the caudal vein followed by iohexol (11.7 ml/kg). The experimental grouping was randomly allocated into control, model, rosiglitazone, and T0070907 groups. Blood samples were collected from the abdominal aorta. Serum creatinine, urea nitrogen, MDA, and SOD contents were detected by biochemical analysis. TNF-α and IL-10 expression was detected by ELISA. Urine creatinine and urine protein were measured following 24-h urine biochemistry testing. Cell pathology and apoptosis were detected by H&E and TUNEL staining, respectively. PPARγ, NLRP3, eNOS, and caspase-3 mRNA expression were detected by qPCR. Caspase-3 and NLRP3 expression were detected by immunohistochemistry. Results: The CI-AKI rat model was successfully established because the results showed that compared with control, serum creatinine, urea nitrogen, MDA, SOD, TNF-α, and IL-10, urine creatinine and urine protein levels were significantly increased in the model group, indicating AKI, but was significantly decreased with rosiglitazone treatment, indicating recovery from injury, while opposite results were obtained with SOD. Apoptosis rate was significantly increased in the model group and significantly decreased with rosiglitazone treatment. NLRP3 and eNOS increased significantly in the model group and decreased significantly with rosiglitazone treatment, while opposite results were obtained with PPARγ. NLRP3 and caspase-3 protein expression was significantly increased in the model group and significantly decreased with rosiglitazone treatment. Conclusion: Rosiglitazone could alleviate acute renal injury in the CI-AKI rat model by regulating the PPARγ/NLRP3 signaling pathway and should be further investigated as a potential treatment in clinical studies.

Exploring the effects of edaravone in rats with contrast-induced acute kidney injury.

AIMS: Oxidative stress and inflammatory response play a vital role in the pathogenesis of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). This study investigated the effects of edaravone in rats with CI-AKI. MAIN METHODS: Male Sprague Dawley rats were randomly assigned into four groups (n = 11-14/group): control, edaravone (30 mg/kg/day intraperitoneally (IP)), CI-AKI, and edaravone with CI-AKI. The induction of CI-AKI was performed by dehydration and the administration of contrast media (iohexol) and inhibitors of prostaglandin (indomethacin) and nitric oxide synthesis (L-NAME: N-nitro L-arginine methyl ester). Edaravone was administered for two weeks before the induction of CI-AKI. Serum creatinine and urea, renal oxidative stress and inflammatory biomarkers, and histopathological alterations were evaluated after 48 h of contrast exposure. KEY FINDINGS: Rats with CI-AKI showed a significant increase in serum creatinine and urea. The levels of antioxidant biomarkers including glutathione peroxidase, superoxide dismutase and reduced glutathione were significantly decreased in CI-AKI group versus control. Pre-treatment of rats with edaravone normalized kidney function and protected the kidney from oxidative damage as demonstrated by normalization of previous biomarkers. Furthermore, edaravone partially ameliorated renal histopathological alterations relative to the CI-AKI group, notably in the nephrons. No changes were observed in inflammatory biomarkers including tumour necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6 among all groups. SIGNIFICANCE: The current findings suggest that edaravone could be a potential strategy to ameliorate developing CI-AKI possibly by improving renal antioxidant capacity. Further studies are warranted to expand the current understanding of the use of edaravone in the various models of AKI.

Comparison of cystatin C, creatinine, and iohexol clearance in pediatric liver transplantation-a retrospective cohort study.

Impaired renal function after pediatric (LT) is a recognized problem. Accurate monitoring of (GFR) is imperative to detect declining renal function. GFR can be estimated via s-creatinine and/or p-cystatin C or measured by inulin and or/iohexol clearances. We retrospectively compared eGFRcrea and eGFRcyst, to mGFRiohex after LT. Data from 91 children with 312 concomitant measurements of s-creatinine, p-cystatin C, and iohexol clearance, obtained between 2007 and 2015, were analyzed. eGFR was calculated by using the p-cystatin C-based CAPA and CKD-EPI formulas, and the s-creatinine-based Schwartz-LYON, FAS, revised Schwartz and MDRD formulas. Also, the arithmetic means of cystatin C-based and creatinine-based equations were used. Every calculated eGFR was compared to mGFRiohex in statistical correlation, accuracy, precision, bias, and misclassifications. Among the different equations, p-cystatin C-based formulas (CAPA and CKD-EPI) as well as the s-creatinine-based Schwartz-LYON formula showed the most correct estimates regarding accuracy (84-87.5%), bias (0.19-4.0 ml/min/1.73 m2 ), and misclassification rate (24.7-25%). In patients with renal function <75 ml/min/1.73 m2 , cystatin C-based formulas were significantly more accurate and less biased than creatinine-based formulas. In conclusion, S-creatinine could be used in a clinical setting on a regular basis in liver transplanted pediatric patients, with reliable results, if eGFR is calculated by the Schwartz-LYON formula. When suspected renal dysfunction, cystatin C-based eGFR should be calculated, since it gives more accurate and less biased estimates than creatinine-based eGFR, and should be confirmed by mGFR (iohexol).

A Machine Learning Approach to Estimate the Glomerular Filtration Rate in Intensive Care Unit Patients Based on Plasma Iohexol Concentrations and Covariates.

OBJECTIVE: This work aims to evaluate whether a machine learning approach is appropriate to estimate the glomerular filtration rate in intensive care unit patients based on sparse iohexol pharmacokinetic data and a limited number of predictors. METHODS: Eighty-six unstable patients received 3250 mg of iohexol intravenously and had nine blood samples collected 5, 30, 60, 180, 360, 540, 720, 1080, and 1440 min thereafter. Data splitting was performed to obtain a training (75%) and a test set (25%). To estimate the glomerular filtration rate, 37 candidate potential predictors were considered and the best machine learning approach among multivariate-adaptive regression spline and extreme gradient boosting (Xgboost) was selected based on the root-mean-square error. The approach associated with the best results in a ten-fold cross-validation experiment was then used to select the best limited combination of predictors in the training set, which was finally evaluated in the test set. RESULTS: The Xgboost approach yielded the best performance in the training set. The best combination of covariates comprised iohexol concentrations at times 180 and 720 min; the relative deviation from these theoretical times; the difference between these two concentrations; the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II; serum creatinine; and the fluid balance. It resulted in a root-mean-square error of 6.2 mL/min and an r2 of 0.866 in the test set. Interestingly, the eight patients in the test set with a glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min were all predicted accordingly. CONCLUSIONS: Xgboost provided accurate glomerular filtration rate estimation in intensive care unit patients based on two timed blood concentrations after iohexol intravenous administration and three additional predictors.

Comparability of Plasma Iohexol Clearance Across Population-Based Cohorts.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation based on creatinine or cystatin C level is currently the standard method for assessing GFR in epidemiologic research and clinical trials despite several important and well-known limitations. Plasma iohexol clearance has been proposed as an inexpensive method for measuring GFR that could replace estimated GFR in many research projects. However, lack of standardization for iohexol assays and the use of different protocols such as single- and multiple-sample methods could potentially hamper comparisons across studies. We compared iohexol assays and GFR measurement protocols in 3 population-based European cohorts. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional investigation. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Participants in the Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Kidney Study (AGES-Kidney; n=805), the Berlin Initiative Study (BIS, n=570), and the Renal Iohexol Clearance Survey Follow-up Study (RENIS-FU; n=1,324). TESTS COMPARED: High-performance liquid chromatography analyses of iohexol. Plasma iohexol clearance calculated using single- versus multiple-sample protocols. OUTCOMES: Measures of agreement between methods. RESULTS: Frozen samples from the 3 studies were obtained and iohexol concentrations were remeasured in the laboratory at the University Hospital of North Norway. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient ρ was>0.96 and Cb (accuracy) was>0.99 for remeasured versus original serum iohexol concentrations in all 3 cohorts, and Passing-Bablok regression did not find differences between measurements, except for a slope of 1.025 (95% CI, 1.006-1.046) for the log-transformed AGES-Kidney measurements. The multiple-sample iohexol clearance measurements in AGES-Kidney and BIS were compared with single-sample GFRs derived from the same iohexol measurements. Mean bias for multiple-sample relative to single-sample GFRs in AGES-Kidney and BIS were-0.25 and-0.15mL/min, and 99% and 97% of absolute differences were within 10% of the multiple-sample result, respectively. LIMITATIONS: Lack of comparison with an independent gold-standard method. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement between the iohexol assays and clearance protocols in the 3 investigated cohorts was substantial. Our findings indicate that plasma iohexol clearance measurements can be compared across these studies.

Estimating glomerular filtration rate in children: evaluation of creatinine- and cystatin C-based equations.

BACKGROUND: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimated by creatinine- and/or cystatin C-based equations (eGFR) is widely used in daily practice. The purpose of our study was to compare new and old eGFR equations with measured GFR (mGFR) by iohexol clearance in a cohort of children with chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: We examined 96 children (median age 9.2 years (range 0.25-17.5)) with CKD stages 1-5. A 7-point iohexol clearance (GFR7p) was defined as the reference method (median mGFR 66 mL/min/1.73 m2, range 6-153). Ten different eGFR equations, with or without body height, were evaluated: Schwartzbedside, SchwartzCKiD, SchwartzcysC, CAPA, LMREV, (LMREV + CAPA) / 2, FAScrea, FAScysC, FAScombi, FASheight. The accuracy was evaluated with percentage within 10 and 30% of GFR7p (P10 and P30). RESULTS: In the group with mGFR below 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, the SchwartzcysC equation had the lowest median bias (interquartile range; IQR) 3.27 (4.80) mL/min/1.73 m2 and the highest accuracy with P10 of 44% and P30 of 85%. In the group with mGFR above 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, the SchwartzCKiD presented with the lowest bias 3.41 (13.1) mL/min/1.73 m2 and P10 of 62% and P30 of 98%. Overall, the SchwartzcysC had the lowest bias - 1.49 (13.5) mL/min/1.73 m2 and both SchwartzcysC and SchwartzCKiD showed P30 of 90%. P10 was 44 and 48%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The SchwartzcysC and the combined SchwartzCKiD present with lower bias and higher accuracy as compared to the other equations. The SchwartzcysC equation is a good height-independent alternative to the SchwartzCKiD equation in children and can be reported directly by the laboratory information system. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , Identifier NCT01092260, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01092260?term=tondel&rank=2.

Iohexol-measured glomerular filtration rate in children and adolescents with chronic kidney disease: a pilot study comparing venous and finger stick methods.

BACKGROUND: Measurement of glomerular filtration rate by iohexol disappearance (iGFR) has become a gold standard in the pediatric chronic kidney disease (CKD) population. The need for serial phlebotomy can be difficult and minimizing venipunctures would be beneficial. Furthermore, finger stick collection for dried blood spot (DBS) may be more tolerable in the pediatric population, and equivalence between these two methods may further simplify the process. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study in children and adolescents 1 to 21 years with stages I-IV CKD. Iohexol was infused and blood drawn 10, 30, 120, and 300 min later. Blood spots on filter paper were collected by finger stick after each of the latter two blood draws. The rate of iohexol plasma disappearance was used to calculate GFR. Pearson's correlation coefficient and bias, Students t test, and Bland-Altman graphical representations were used to compare methods. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were recruited. The mean creatinine was 1.13 mg/dL (SD 0.45), the mean 4-point iGFR was 73.2 ml/min/1.73m2 (SD 27.5) and the mean 2-point iGFR was 75.6 ml/min/1.73m2 (SD 27.3). Correlation between 2-point and 4-point venous GFR was r = 0.97; p < 0.001. The correlation between the DBS and the 2-point venous GFR was r = 0.95; p < 0.001, with no significant bias. Ninety-four percent of the 2-point GFR's were within 10% of the 4-point GFR's and 80% of DBS-GFRs were within 10% of the 2-point GFR's. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-point iGFR was highly correlated and agreed well with the 4-point iGFR. The same was true for the DBS method and the 2-point venous method. DBS sampling by finger stick sampling at 2 time points after iohexol infusion gave an acceptably accurate measurement of GFR.

Accuracy of iohexol plasma clearance for GFR-determination: a comparison between single and dual sampling.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines regarding plasma-sampling techniques for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) determination are inconsistent. Single-sample methods are commonly believed not to be precise enough to meet clinical demands. The present study compared the agreement between single- and dual- plasma sampling methods with a three-point plasma clearance of iohexol. METHODS: A total of 46 healthy volunteers and 124 chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with varying degrees of renal dysfunction received 5 ml iohexol (300 mgI/ml) i.v. and plasma samples were drawn at 2-, 3- and 4-h post-injection. Plasma-iodine concentrations were detected by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). RESULTS: Bias was similar among single-plasma sampling methods (SPSM) and dual-plasma sampling methods (DPSM). The best correlation was obtained from the 2- and 4-h DPSM (concordance correlation coefficient [CCC]: 0.9988) with none of the estimates differed by more than 30% from the reference GFR and only one (0.06%) estimate differed by more than 10% (P30, 100%; P10, 99.4%). SPSM using samples around 3- or 4-h demonstrated acceptable accuracy at a GFR level of ≥60 ml/min/1.73m2 (P30 = 100% and P10 > 75% for both measurements). CONCLUSION: 4-h SPSM is advantageous in clinical practice in subjects with GFR ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73m2. For patients with an expected GFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m2, a prolonged sampling time is more reliable.

Combination of pediatric and adult formulas yield valid glomerular filtration rate estimates in young adults with a history of pediatric chronic kidney disease.

As patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) transition from pediatric nephrology care to adult care, their kidney function is clinically assessed by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using both pediatric and adult equations, which may not be congruent. Here we evaluated commonly used eGFR equations and directly measured iohexol GFR (iGFR) among participants between ages 18 and 26 with a diagnosis of pediatric CKD in the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children (CKiD) cohort. The bedside serum creatinine (SCr)-only equation (CKiDSCr), the SCr-only CKD-EPI (CKD-EPISCr), the cystatin C (Cys)-only CKD-EPI (CKD-EPICys) and the combined SCr and Cys CKD-EPI (CKD-EPISCr-Cys) were compared with a) 279 measured iGFRs obtained from 187 participants and b) 548 eGFRs from the SCr and Cys-based CKiD equation (CKiDSCr-Cys) obtained from 219 participants. Among emerging adults with a median iGFR of 49 ml/min/1.73m2, the CKiDSCr-Cys equation had low bias (+1.5 ml/min/1.73m2) and high correlation (0.94), while CKiDSCr underestimated iGFR and CKiDSCr-Cys (-5.6 and -7.4 ml/min/1.73m2, respectively) and CKD-EPISCr had an overestimation bias (+8.2 and +6.1 ml/min/1.73m2, respectively). However, the CKD-EPICys and CKD-EPISCr-Cys exhibited strong agreement with both iGFR and CKiDSCr-Cys. GFR may also be validly estimated in this population by taking the simple average of CKiDSCr and CKD-EPISCr (average bias +1.3 compared to iGFR and -0.6 compared to CKiDSCr-Cys). Clinicians should be aware that individually the pediatric and adult SCr-based estimates of GFR had large discrepancies among emerging adults with pediatric CKD. Thus, when cystatin C is not available, we recommend the average of pediatric and adult SCr-based eGFR as a valid tool for clinical use.

Performance of glomerular filtration rate estimation equations in Congolese healthy adults: The inopportunity of the ethnic correction.

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: In the estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR), ethnicity is an important determinant. However, all existing equations have been built solely from Caucasian and Afro-American populations and they are potentially inaccurate for estimating GFR in African populations. We therefore evaluated the performance of different estimated GFR (eGFR) equations in predicting measured GFR (mGFR). METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 93 healthy adults were randomly selected in the general population of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo, between June 2015 and April 2016. We compared mGFR by plasma clearance of iohexol with eGFR obtained with the Modified Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation with and without ethnic factor, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology (CKD-EPI) serum creatinine (SCr)-based equation, with and without ethnic factor, the cystatin C-based CKD-EPI equation (CKD-EPI SCys) and with the combined equation (CKD-EPI SCrCys) with and without ethnic factor. The performance of the equations was studied by calculating bias, precision and accuracy within 30% (P30) of mGFR. RESULTS: There were 48 women and 45 men. Their mean age was 45.0±15.7 years and the average body surface area was 1.68±0.16m2. Mean mGFR was 92.0±17.2 mL/min/1.73m2 (range of 57 to 141 mL/min/1.73m2). Mean eGFRs with the different equations were 105.5±30.1 and 87.2±24.8 mL/min/1.73m2 for MDRD with and without ethnic factor, respectively; 108.8±24.1 and 94.3x20.9 mL/min/1.73m2 for CKD-EPI SCr with and without ethnic factor, respectively, 93.5±18.6 mL/min/1.73m2 for CKD-EPI SCys; 93.5±18.0 and 101±19.6 mL/min/ 1.73m2 for CKD-EPI SCrCys with and without ethnic factor, respectively. All equations slightly overestimated mGFR except MDRD without ethnic factor which underestimated by -3.8±23.0 mL/min /1.73m2. Both CKD-EPI SCr and MDRD with ethnic factors highly overestimated mGFR with a bias of 17.9±19.2 and 14.5±27.1 mL/min/1.73m2, respectively. There was a trend for better P30 for MDRD and CKD-EPI SCr without than with the ethnic factor [86.0% versus 79.6% for MDRD (p = 0.21) and 81.7% versus 73.1% for the CKD-EPI SCr equations (p = 0.057)]. CKD-EPI SCrCys and CKD-EPI SCys were more effective than creatinine-based equations. CONCLUSION: In the Congolese healthy population, MDRD and CKD-EPI equations without ethnic factors had better performance than the same equations with ethnic factor. The equations using Cys C (alone or combined with SCr) performed better than the creatinine-based equations.

Association between glomerular filtration rate (measured by high-performance liquid chromatography with iohexol) and plasma oxalate / Associação entre taxa de filtração glomerular (medida por cromatografia liquida de alto desempenho com iohexol) e oxalato plasmático

ABSTRACT Introduction: Secondary hyperoxalemia is a multifactorial disease that affects several organs and tissues in patients with native or transplanted kidneys. Plasma oxalate may increase during renal failure because it is cleared from the body by the kidneys. However, there is scarce evidence about the association between glomerular filtration rate and plasma oxalate, especially in the early stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods: A case series focuses on the description of variations in clinical presentation. A pilot study was conducted using a cross-sectional analysis with 72 subjects. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and plasma oxalate levels were measured for all patients. Results: Median (IQR) GFR was 70.50 [39.0; 91.0] mL/min/1.73 m2. Plasma oxalate was < 5.0 µmol/L in all patients with a GFR > 30 mL/min/1.73m2. Among the 14 patients with severe CKD (GFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) only 4 patients showed a slightly increased plasma oxalate level (between 6 and 12 µmol/L). Conclusion: In non-primary hyperoxaluria, plasma oxalate concentration increases when GFR < 30mL/min/1.73 m2 and, in our opinion, values greater than 5 µmol/L with a GFR > 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 are suggestive of primary hyperoxaluria. Further studies are necessary to confirm plasma oxalate increase in patients with low GFR levels (< 30mL/min/1.73 m2).

RESUMO Introdução: A hiperoxalemia secundária é uma doença multifatorial que afeta vários órgãos e tecidos em pacientes com rins nativos ou transplantados. O oxalato plasmático pode aumentar durante a insuficiência renal porque é eliminado do corpo pelos rins. No entanto, há evidências escassas sobre a associação entre taxa de filtração glomerular e oxalato plasmático, especialmente nos estágios iniciais da doença renal crônica (DRC). Métodos: uma casuística centrada na descrição das variações na apresentação clínica. Foi realizado um estudo piloto a partir da análise transversal com 72 indivíduos. As taxas de filtração glomerular (TFG) e os níveis plasmáticos de oxalato foram medidos para todos os pacientes. Resultados: A TFG mediana (IIQ) foi de 70,50 [39,0; 91,0] mL/min/1,73 m2. O nível plasmático de oxalato foi < 5,0 µmol/L em todos os pacientes com TFG > 30 mL/min/1,73 m2. Entre os 14 pacientes com DRC grave (TFG < 30 mL/min/1,73 m2), apenas quatro apresentaram ligeiro aumento do nível plasmático de oxalato (entre 6 e 12 µmol/L). Conclusão: Na hiperoxalúria não primária, a concentração plasmática de oxalato aumenta quando TFG < 30 mL/min/1,73 m2 e, em nossa opinião, valores superiores a 5 µmol/L com TFG > 30 mL/min/1,73 m2 sugerem presença de hiperoxalúria primária. Estudos adicionais são necessários para confirmar o aumento do oxalato plasmático em pacientes com níveis baixos de TFG (< 30 mL/min/1,73 m2).

Elevated blood pressure is not associated with accelerated glomerular filtration rate decline in the general non-diabetic middle-aged population.

Although hypertension is a risk factor for end-stage renal disease, this complication develops in only a minority of hypertensive patients. Whether non-malignant hypertension itself is sufficient to cause reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is unclear. Therefore, we investigated whether elevated blood pressure (BP) was associated with accelerated GFR decline in the general population. The study was based on the Renal Iohexol Clearance Survey in Tromsø 6 (RENIS-T6), which included a representative sample of 1594 individuals aged 50 to 62 years from the general population without baseline diabetes or kidney or cardiovascular disease. GFR was measured as iohexol clearance at baseline and follow-up after a median observation time of 5.6 years. BP was measured according to a standardized procedure. The mean (SD) GFR decline rate was 0.95 (2.23) ml/min/yr. In multivariable adjusted linear mixed regressions with either baseline systolic or diastolic BP as the independent variable, there were no statistically significant associations with GFR decline. Thus, elevated BP is not associated with accelerated mean GFR decline in the general middle-aged population. Hence, additional genetic and environmental factors are probably necessary for elevated BP to develop manifest chronic kidney disease in some individuals.

Which equations should and which should not be employed in calculating eGFR in children?

PURPOSE: We assessed the reliability of calculating eGFR in children as compared to the iohexol disappearance test (GFR-I), which was performed 417 times in 353 children aged 2 and more. MATERIAL/METHODS: eGFR was estimated with equations based on serum creatinine: Schwartz (1: eGFR-Scr), Cockroft-Gault (2: eGFR-CG) and MDRD (3: eGFR-MDRD), and on creatinine clearance (4: eGFR-U), or relying on serum cystatin C: Hoeck (5: eGFR-H), Bokenkamp (6: eGFR-B) and Filler (7: eGFR-F), and on the three Schwartz markers (8: eGFR-S3M). Mean relative error (RE), correlation (R), Bland-Altman analysis and accuracy of GFR-I were studied in all patients and in subgroups: at GFR<60ml/min/1.73m(2); in children aged ≤12 and >12. RESULTS: The results by eGFR-Scr, eGFR-S3M demonstrated no statistical difference to GFR-I at GFR<60ml/min/1.73m(2), but underestimated eGFR at higher filtration values by 11.6±15.1% and 19.1±16.4, respectively (p<0.0000). The eGFR-B, eGFR-F and eGFR-MDRD equations illustrated important overestimation of reference GFR results (RE: 84±44.2%; 29.5±27.9%, 35.6±62%; p<0.0000 for all). The MDRD and C-G formulas showed statistically better consistency in children aged >12. A good agreement was achieved by the eGFR-H equation (5.1±21.9%; p<0.0000; R=0.78). CONCLUSIONS: (1) Schwartz equations show a good conformity at GFR<60ml/min/1.73m(2), but underestimate the results at higher GFR values. (2) The Bokenkamp equation with original coefficient should not be employed in children. (3) The use of the Hoeck formula in all children and C-G and MDRD formula in children aged >12 is possible. (4) The error of eGFR calculations increases at higher GFR values.

A new equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate in cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equation, the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation and the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation in cancer patients was tested. An equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was created that was adapted to cancer patients. METHODS: Data from 641 oncology patients referred for (51)Cr-EDTA measurements were included. Factors that may affect GFR, i.e. gender, hypertension, diabetes, non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), exposure to chemotherapy, age, weight, height, BMI, body surface area and creatinine value were correlated to (51)Cr-EDTA-measured GFR. The significant factors were then included in a multiple regression analysis correlated to the measured GFR (mGFR). RESULTS: The equation of log10 (GFR; ml/min/1.73 m2) = 2.36-0.33*log10 (age) - 0.78*log10 (creatinine) + 0.87*log10 (weight) - 0.03*NSAID*log10 (creatinine) + gender (1 = female, 0 = male)*(0.05*NSAID - 0.003*BMI) was generated. Expressed as a mean (standard deviation) of mGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2, this equation, the 'New Equation', overestimated GFR by 26 (33)%, while CG, MDRD and CKD-EPI overestimated GFR by 26 (40)%, 32 (42)% and 48 (47)%, respectively. For mGFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2, the New Equation underestimated GFR by only 3 (16)%, while CG, MDRD and CKD-EPI overestimated GFR by 12 (25)%, 10 (26)% and 5 (23)%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study describes a novel equation with a higher accuracy than other commonly used GFR equations for estimating GFR in cancer patients.

Accuracy of the MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) study and CKD-EPI (CKD Epidemiology Collaboration) equations for estimation of GFR in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function, commonly estimated using equations that adjust serum creatinine concentration for age, race, and sex. The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation is widely used, but underestimates GFR at higher levels. The serum creatinine-based Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI(cr)) equation generally provides more accurate estimation at GFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Newer equations have been reported using cystatin C concentration either alone (CKD-EPI(cys)) or in combination with creatinine concentration (CKD-EPI(cr-cys)). None of these equations has been well validated in older people. We tested the accuracy of these equations in people 74 years or older compared with GFR measured by a reference method. STUDY DESIGN: Diagnostic test evaluation in a prospective cohort. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Participants (n = 394; median age, 80 [range, 74-97] years) recruited from nephrology clinics and the community. INDEX TEST: GFR estimated using the MDRD Study, CKD-EPI(cr), CKD-EPI(cys) and CKD-EPI(cr-cys) equations. REFERENCE TEST: GFR measured using an iohexol clearance method. RESULTS: Median measured GFR was 53.4 (range, 7.2-100.9) mL/min/1.73 m(2). MDRD Study-, CKD-EPI(cr)-, and CKD-EPI(cr-cys)-estimated GFRs overestimated GFR (median differences of 3.5 [P< 0.001], 1.7 [P < 0.001], and 0.8 [P = 0.02] mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively); the CKD-EPI(cys) equation was unbiased. Accuracy (percentage of estimates within 30% of measured GFR [P(30)]) was 81%, 83%, 86%, and 86% for the MDRD Study, CKD-EPI(cr), CKD-EPI(cys), and CKD-EPI(cr-cys) equations, respectively. Accuracy of the MDRD Study equation was inferior (P = 0.004) to the CKD-EPI(cr) equation at GFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). LIMITATIONS: Those of non-European ancestry were not included. For practical reasons, only a 4-hour sampling protocol was used for iohexol clearance. CONCLUSIONS: The CKD-EPI(cr) equation appeared less biased and was more accurate than the MDRD Study equation. No equation achieved an ideal P(30) in the overall population. Our data suggest that GFR estimation is as satisfactory in older people of European ancestry as it has been reported to be in younger individuals.

Two novel equations to estimate kidney function in persons aged 70 years or older.

BACKGROUND: In older adults, current equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) are not validated and may misclassify elderly persons in terms of their stage of chronic kidney disease. OBJECTIVE: To derive the Berlin Initiative Study (BIS) equation, a novel estimator of GFR in elderly participants. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. Data were split for analysis into 2 sets for equation development and internal validation. SETTING: Random community-based population of a large insurance company. PARTICIPANTS: 610 participants aged 70 years or older (mean age, 78.5 years). INTERVENTION: Iohexol plasma clearance measurement as gold standard. MEASUREMENTS: GFR, measured as the plasma clearance of the endogenous marker iohexol, to compare performance of existing equations of estimated GFR with measured GFR of the gold standard; estimation of measured GFR from standardized creatinine and cystatin C levels, sex, and age in the learning sample; and comparison of the BIS equations (BIS1: creatinine-based; BIS2: creatinine- and cystatin C-based) with other estimating equations and determination of bias, precision, and accuracy in the validation sample. RESULTS: The new BIS2 equation yielded the smallest bias followed by the creatinine-based BIS1 and Cockcroft-Gault equations. All other equations considerably overestimated GFR. The BIS equations confirmed a high prevalence of persons older than 70 years with a GFR less than 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (BIS1, 50.4%; BIS2, 47.4%; measured GFR, 47.9%). The total misclassification rate for this criterion was smallest for the BIS2 equation (11.6%), followed by the cystatin C equation 2 (15.1%) proposed by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration. Among the creatinine-based equations, BIS1 had the smallest misclassification rate (17.2%), followed by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (20.4%). LIMITATION: There was no validation by an external data set. CONCLUSION: The BIS2 equation should be used to estimate GFR in persons aged 70 years or older with normal or mild to moderately reduced kidney function. If cystatin C is not available, the BIS1 equation is an acceptable alternative. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplatation (KfH) Foundation of Preventive Medicine.

Estimated GFR associates with cardiovascular risk factors independently of measured GFR.

Estimation of the GFR (eGFR) using creatinine- or cystatin C-based equations is imperfect, especially when the true GFR is normal or near-normal. Modest reductions in eGFR from the normal range variably predict cardiovascular morbidity. If eGFR associates not only with measured GFR (mGFR) but also with cardiovascular risk factors, the effects of these non-GFR-related factors might bias the association between eGFR and outcome. To investigate these potential non-GFR-related associations between eGFR and cardiovascular risk factors, we measured GFR by iohexol clearance in a sample from the general population (age 50 to 62 years) without known cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or kidney disease. Even after adjustment for mGFR, eGFR associated with traditional cardiovascular risk factors in multiple regression analyses. More risk factors influenced cystatin C-based eGFR than creatinine-based eGFR, adjusted for mGFR, and some of the risk factors exhibited nonlinear effects in generalized additive models (P<0.05). These results suggest that eGFR, calculated using standard creatinine- or cystatin C-based equations, partially depends on factors other than the true GFR. Thus, estimates of cardiovascular risk associated with small changes in eGFR must be interpreted with caution.

Different equations to combine creatinine and cystatin C to predict GFR. Arithmetic mean of existing equations performs as well as complex combinations.

PURPOSE: To test various ways of combining creatinine and cystatin C in equations to predict glomerular filtration rate (GFR). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Performance of the following expressions to predict GFR was compared with measured GFR (iohexol clearance, mL/min/1.73 m(2)) in 857 patients: (i) Lund-Malmö creatinine equation, (ii) Grubb cystatin C equation, (iii) arithmetic mean of (1) and (2), (iv) geometric mean of (1) and (2), (v) linear regression on (1) and (2), (vi) regression on (1) and cystatin C, and (vii) regression on creatinine, cystatin C, age and gender. RESULTS: For the entire cohort median percent error (bias) was <5% for all expressions, though all expressions tended to underestimate (-8.3 to 15.8%) GFR at levels > or =90 mL/min/1.73 m(2). The five expressions combining creatinine and cystatin C significantly improved correlation and accuracy (p<0.001) within 15 and 30% of measured GFR compared with the equations based on the separate analytes and with no significant difference between the five expressions. In a subgroup of patients with neurological disease and muscle atrophy the cystatin C equation performed better than the expressions combining creatinine and cystatin C. CONCLUSION: Simply calculating the arithmetic mean of predicted GFR based on separate creatinine and cystatin C equations performs equally well as more complex equations. Reporting GFR based on separate creatinine and cystatin C equations, and their arithmetic mean also has the definite advantage that the physician can choose the estimated GFR, most appropriate depending on the clinical setting and patient characteristics.