Anterior segment swept-source optical coherence tomography and ultrasound biomicroscopy in iris and ciliary body lesions.

OBJECTIVES: Differentiation of iris and ciliary body lesions as benign or malignant and cystic or solid is important. The aim of this study was to compare anterior segment swept-source optical coherence tomography (AS SS-OCT) and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) findings in iris and ciliary body tumors. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Forty-two eyes of 38 cases with iris and ciliary body tumors imaged with UBM and AS SS-OCT between September 2018 and September 2023 were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: Of 42 eyes, 14 had melanoma, 14 iris pigment epithelial (IPE) cysts, 7 nevi, 3 Lisch nodules, 2 iris stromal cysts, 1 pars plana cysts, and 1 iris mammillations. An equivalent (100%) visualization of the anterior tumor margin was obtained with both techniques. Compared to AS SS-OCT, UBM was superior for posterior margin visualization in melanocytic tumors and IPE cysts. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated good agreement between UBM and AS SS-OCT for melanocytic tumors < 2.5 mm in base diameter and < 2 mm in thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Although, UBM is the gold standard for ciliary body and iridociliary tumors. AS SS-OCT should be considered as an excellent alternative to UBM, especially in minimally elevated iris lesions.

A case report of iridoschisis and cataract: a challenging diagnosis.

PURPOSE: To report the cataract surgery of a 79-year-old female patient with iridoschisis and senile nuclear cataracts. OBSERVATIONS: Ophthalmologic examination of the 79-year-old female patient who came to our clinic with complaints of decreased vision in the right eye was observed to have a grade-3 senile nuclear cataract and iridoschisis in quadrants 2-3, 4-7, and 10-11 of the iris in the right eye and a grade-2 senile nuclear cataract and iridoschisis in quadrants 5-7 in the left eye to a lesser extent compared to the right eye. The iris fibrils were not connected to the corneal endothelium. A safe surgical area was created by administering the viscoelastic material several times during cataract surgery. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: Although iridoschisis has a low incidence rate, it is important to also consider comorbid ocular pathologies when treating iridoschisis patients. Since cataract surgery for these patients is more specialized than for uncomplicated cases, the necessary surgical planning must be paid due diligence.

Correlation of fitzpatrick skin type and iris color with tumor size in 823 patients with uveal melanoma.

PURPOSE: To determine the correlation of Fitzpatrick Skin Type (FST) and iris color with tumor size (tumor thickness and basal diameter) in patients with uveal melanoma. DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort METHODS: Retrospective cohort from a single ocular oncology center of 823 patients with uveal melanoma and documented FST, iris color, and tumor size. Patients were classified by FST (type I, II, and III-V) and iris color (blue, green, and brown) on the basis of external facial photography. There were no FST type VI patients. Tumor thickness was classified into small [< 3 millimeter (mm)], medium (3.1-8.0 mm), or large (> 8.0 mm), and basal diameter into small (< 10 mm), medium (10.1-15 mm) or large (> 15 mm). The correlation of FST and iris color with tumor thickness and basal diameter was evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis H test. RESULTS: The FST classification was type I (n = 92, 11%), type II (n = 643, 78%), or III-V (n = 88, 11%), and iris color was blue (n = 472, 57%), green (n = 102, 12%), or brown (n = 249, 30%). A comparison of FST revealed differences in mean tumor thickness (P = 0.04) and basal diameter (P = 0.006). Iris color showed no difference for mean tumor thickness (P = 0.41) or basal diameter (P = 0.48). There was a statistically significant difference with brown iris color relative to FST III-V for mean tumor thickness (P = 0.003) and basal diameter (P = 0.001) but no difference with blue or green iris color (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Iris color alone showed no difference in tumor size, but those with brown iris color and FST type III-V demonstrated larger tumor thickness and basal diameter.

An analysis of iris pattern as a risk factor for skin cancer development in immunosuppressed renal transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Renal transplant recipients are at increased risk of keratinocyte skin cancers with a tendency to have multiple, aggressive and difficult to treat tumours. The eye and the skin share the same embryological ectoderm. Iris pattern has recently been reported as a predictive risk factor for skin cancer in non-immunosuppressed Southern European (Grigore et al., J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2018, 1662) and Irish populations (Ridge et al., J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2022, e542). AIMS: To analyse if an individual's iris pattern is an independent risk factor for the development of keratinocyte skin cancers in renal transplant recipients. METHODS: Iris patterns of 110 renal transplant recipients were evaluated using the Simionescu visual three-step technique (iris periphery, colarette and iris freckling [Simionescu et al., Ann Res Rev Biol, 2014, 2525]). Established risk factors for skin cancer in transplant patients were recorded as confounding factors. RESULTS: Observational cross-sectional study including 110 renal transplant population. Thirty-one participants had skin cancer. In the skin cancer group, iris periphery was blue/grey in 74.3% (p = 0.053, OR 2.5), the colarette was light brown in 57.1% (p < 0.0043) and iris freckles were present in 55%(p = 0.044). Dark brown and blue colarettes were observed in controls. Binary Logistic Regression analysis showed light brown colarette is a significant independent risk factor for skin cancer (OR 4.54, p < 0.02, CI 1.56-10.57). CONCLUSION: Within this renal transplant population a blue iris periphery, light brown colarette and presence of freckling confers an independent risk for keratinocyte skin cancer. Iris pattern is a useful tool for identification of transplant patients at risk of keratinocyte skin cancer and an easy-to-use technique for risk evaluation in this cohort. This is the first study looking at iris pattern and keratinocyte skin cancer risk in renal transplant population.

Bilateral acute iris transillumination (BAIT) syndrome: Differential diagnosis based on clinical, OCT and UBM findings.

INTRODUCTION: Bilateral acute iris transillumination (BAIT) is a relatively new syndrome whose etiopathogenesis is still not fully understood. It is characterized by acute bilateral onset of intense pigment dispersion in the anterior chamber, iris depigmentation with severe transillumination defects, accentuated pigment deposition in the angle, and elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). In literature, the first case was of bilateral acute iris depigmentation (BADI) reported in 2004 in a 77-year-old woman. In 2019, Perone et al. published a review about BAIT syndrome. They reported a total of 79 cases have been published up that date, mainly in Europe and especially in Turkey and Belgium. The majority of reported cases were of bilateral acute iris depigmentation (BADI). BAIT syndrome might be mainly confused with acute iridocyclitis, acute primary angle-closure (APAC) and pigment dispersion syndrome (PDS). In relation to BAIT, controversies still exist regarding the etiology being the differential diagnosis of paramount importance for adequate treatment. PURPOSE: To report a case of BAIT syndrome associated to refractory glaucoma and to discuss the differential diagnosis based on clinical, OCT and UBM findings. METHODS: We present a case of BAIT syndrome in which clinical, OCT and UBM findings have pointed out the similarities and, mainly the diagnosis differences with other ocular diseases. CONCLUSIONS: BAIT syndrome with accentuated IOP rise must be differentiated of other ocular diseases. It requires urgent clinical therapy and/or surgical management as occurred in the present case for avoiding structural damage in OCT and visual field loss. OCT and UBM are critical for early recognition, differential diagnosis and management.

Clinical and pathological findings in five dogs with nodular histiocytic iritis in the United Kingdom: A case series.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe the clinical presentation, histopathology, management, and outcome of nodular histiocytic iritis, an intraocular variant of nodular granulomatous episcleritis (NGE). METHODS: A retrospective review of the medical records of five dogs with intraocular NGE-type inflammation as diagnosed by histopathology. RESULTS: Four Border Collies and one crossbreed dog, aged 1.5-3.4 years (mean age 2.38 years). The clinical presentation was an extensive, raised, pale iris lesion of variable location. All cases were unilateral. The physical examination was normal. Complete blood count/serum biochemistry (n = 1) and thoracic radiography (n = 1) were normal. Ocular ultrasound (n = 2) was normal apart from increased iris thickness. Enucleation (n = 4) or excisional biopsy (iridectomy, n = 1) was performed because of suspected neoplasia. Following enucleation, the remaining, contralateral eye did not develop additional lesions (9 days-3.7 years follow-up). There was no recurrence following sector iridectomy with 5 months topical 1% prednisolone acetate (3.9 years follow-up). The histopathologic findings in all five cases indicated a focal histiocytic and lymphoplasmacytic anterior uveitis (iritis), similar to that seen in cases of NGE. CONCLUSION: Nodular histiocytic iritis presents as unilateral iris thickening in isolation and young Collies appear to be predisposed. The histopathological findings are similar to NGE. Although the clinical presentation resembles intraocular neoplasia, an inflammatory process should be considered, which may be amenable to medical management. Definitive diagnosis may be obtained by iris sampling.

Iris melanoma: Review of clinical features, risks, management, and outcomes.

Primary uveal melanoma is rare and affects approximately 8,000 persons per year worldwide. This malignancy can involve the iris, ciliary body, and choroid. Of these three structures, the iris is the least commonly affected site, representing only 4% of all uveal melanomas. Iris melanoma can arise from iris melanocytic nevus, iris melanocytosis, or de novo. In a longitudinal study of 1,611 patients with iris nevus, transformation into melanoma, using Kaplan-Meier estimates, was found in 2.6% by five years and in 4.1% by 10 years. The factors that predicted growth of iris melanocytic nevus into melanoma are denoted by a letter (ABCDEF) guide: A for age ≤40 years old at presentation (hazard ratio [HR] = 3, P = .01), B for blood (hyphema) (HR = 9, P < .0004), C for clock hour of tumor inferiorly (tumor location) (HR = 9, P = .03), D for diffuse flat tumor configuration (HR = 14, P = .02), E for ectropion uveae (HR = 4, P = .002), and F for feathery ill-defined margins (HR = 3, P = .02). At diagnosis, iris melanoma has a mean cross-sectional diameter of 5.5 mm and thickness of 2.1 mm, often with tumor seeding (28%) and secondary glaucoma (35%). We provide a comprehensive review of iris nevus and melanoma to explore relevant demographic and clinical data, risk factors for tumor growth, management, and prognosis, with the hope that clinicians will be more comfortable in understanding this rare malignant condition.

Iris Neovascularization After Vitreous Metastasis of a Cutaneous Melanoma.

This case report describes iris neovascularization secondary to vitreous metastasis of a cutaneous melanoma in a man aged 75 years who presented with elevated intraocular pressure.

Iridial melanocytoma in a ferruginous hawk (Buteo regalis): A case report and review of avian melanocytic neoplasia.

A 21-year-old, suspected female captive ferruginous hawk (Buteo regalis) was followed for 3 years due to an iridial mass of the left eye (OS) that progressively increased in size. Enucleation of OS was eventually recommended due to the iridial mass taking up approximately 75% of the anterior chamber, and the bird seemed less active. A complete physical examination, complete blood cell count, biochemistry, and survey radiographs were performed pre-surgery with no findings indicating metastasis. A subconjunctival enucleation was performed and the globe was submitted for histopathology through the Comparative Ocular Pathology Lab of Wisconsin. The histopathologic evaluation determined the mass to be consistent with an iris melanocytoma, which has not been previously reported in this species. The patient recovered well from surgery and has remained comfortable and active for 117 days post-surgery. This case report aimed to review the current available information on avian ocular neoplasms as well as describe the clinical presentation, medical management and surgical procedure, and long-term follow-up for this patient to enhance clinical understanding of the behavior of iris melanocytic tumors in avian species.

Traboulsi syndrome without features of Marfan syndrome caused by a novel homozygous ASPH variant associated with a heterozygous FBN1 variant.

BACKGROUND: Traboulsi syndrome is a rare disease clinically characterized by facial dysmorphism, abnormal spontaneous filtering blebs, ectopia lentis (EL) and multiple anterior segment abnormalities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An 18-year-old female was referred to the Emergency Service of Hospital São Geraldo (HSG) claiming decreased right eye (RE) visual acuity associated with ocular pain that was noticed approximately 2 months earlier. She underwent a complete ophthalmic and physical examination including hands, ankle, wrist and chest X-ray, abdominal ultrasound, echocardiogram and genetic analysis (whole-exome sequencing). RESULTS: The ophthalmic examination revealed a high myopia with spherical equivalent of - 9.50 D and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/60 in RE and - 9.25 D with BCVA of 20/30 in the left eye (LE). Slit-lamp examination showed normal conjunctiva in both eyes (BE) and a superior-temporal cystic lesion in RE and nasal in LE; the flat anterior chamber in BE with the transparent crystalline lens touches the central corneal endothelium in the RE. Fundoscopy suggested glaucoma as the cup/disc ratio was 0.7, although the intraocular pressure (IOP) was 10 mmHg in BE without medication. Validation of data from whole exome demonstrated a novel splicing homozygous pathogenic variant (PV) (c.1765-1G>A) of the ASPH gene as well as a heterozygous variant of unknown significance (VUS) of the FBN1 gene (c.6832C>T). CONCLUSION: We here report a novel splice-affecting homozygous pathogenic variant in the ASPH gene that was detected in a Brazilian patient with clinical features of Traboulsi syndrome.

Side Effects of Proton Beam Radiotherapy Treatment on Iris Melanoma.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the functional outcome and ocular side effects of patients receiving proton beam radiotherapy (PBR) for the treatment of iris melanoma (IM). DESIGN: This retrospective study analyzed prospectively collected data. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with IM who underwent PBR as a primary treatment. METHODS: Treatment was given in the form of whole PBR (wPBR: n = 51) or segmental PBR (sPBR: n = 98). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity (VA) and side effects were divided into ocular surface disease (OSD), secondary glaucoma, or cataract development. RESULTS: A total of 149 eyes of 149 patients with a mean age of 53.9 ± 16.0 years were included. Tumor recurrence developed in 3 patients (wPBR: 1/51; sPBR: 2/98). Ocular surface disease was observed in 78.4% of the wPBR group (40/51) and 25.5% of the sPBR group (25/98) (P < 0.001) after 0.7 ± 1.2 years and 1.1 ± 0.9 years, respectively. The main side effect was dry eye syndrome in both groups, but severe side effects such as limbal stem cell failure were found only in the wPBR group (4/51; 7.8%). Secondary glaucoma developed in 31.4% of the wPBR group (16/51) compared with 1.0% in the sPBR group (1/98; P < 0.001). Glaucoma control was generally achieved with eye drops, whereas surgery was necessary in 5 patients (wPBR: 4/51, 7.8%; sPBR: 1/98, 1%). Cataract surgery was performed in 47.9% of the wPBR group (23/48) and 19.8% of the sPBR group (19/96) (P < 0.001). Before treatment, VA was 0.14 ± 0.27 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in the wPBR group and 0.04 ± 0.19 logMAR in the sPBR group. A worsening was seen in the wPBR group (0.55 ± 0.16 logMAR; P < 0.001) 6 months after radiotherapy, which normalized after 12 months (0.15 ± 0.30 logMAR; P = 0.17). In the sPBR group, no such decrease in VA was observed (6 months: 0.03 ± 0.22 logMAR, P = 0.54; 12 months: 0.04 ± 0.21 logMAR, P = 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that PBR is a very successful treatment option for patients with IM, showing a high tumor control rate and relatively low complication profile. Tumor recurrence was a rare event, and secondary enucleation was not necessary in any patient. Side effects are commonly seen, but severe side effects such as limbal stem cell failure or secondary glaucoma mainly developed after wPBR. These results are important for clinical decision making and discussion with the patient regarding this form of radiotherapy. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

[A Case of Rectal Neuroendocrine Carcinoma with Iris Metastasis].

A 62-year-old man with anal pain was diagnosed with rectal neuroendocrine carcinoma. There were multiple metastases in the liver, lung, paraaortic lymph node, and bone of the patient. After performing a diverting colostomy, irinotecan and cisplatin were administered. Partial response was obtained after 2 courses, and anal pain improved. However, after 8 courses, multiple skin metastases were found on his back. At the same time, the patient also complained of redness, pain, and impaired vision in the right eye. Iris metastasis was diagnosed clinically by ophthalmologic examination and with contrast- enhanced MRI. Iris metastasis was treated with 5 doses of 4 Gy irradiation, ameliorating the eye symptoms. The patient died of the original disease 13 months after the initial diagnosis; however, multidisciplinary treatment appeared effective for palliating cancer symptoms.

Neovascular glaucoma caused by small-cell lung cancer iris metastasis: A case presentation.

Small-cell lung cancer may directly affect the eye by metastatic proliferation or indirectly by paraneoplastic syndromes. The choroid is the most common site for uveal metastasis (90%); however, the iris can be involved in a smaller proportion of cases (incidence <10%). Blurred vision, pain, redness, photophobia, glaucoma, hyphema and visual field defects can arise from this metastatic involvement. The median survival time for patients with iris metastasis is reported to be 4 months. Secondary glaucoma can be managed with topical and oral treatment, transscleral cyclophotocoagulation, laser trabeculoplasty, anti-VEGF, Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS), filtering surgery, shunting surgery or enucleation. A case of primary small-cell lung cancer with iris metastasis is presented. The metastases produced an angle-closure glaucoma, which was refractory to topical treatment. Local radiotherapy was administered, obtaining a good local response.

A distorted pupil could be caused by an iris melanoma.

Melanoma isolated to the iris is rare and can present with a distorted pupil. This is a case report of an 81-year-old asymptomatic man, who had a large pigmented element in his left iris through 30 years. Because of involvement of the angle the tumour was excised with the ciliary body, and histopathologic examination revealed an iris melanoma. The aim of this report is to underscore the clinical signs of an iris melanoma and when surgery is needed.

Iris metastasis as resistance mechanism to atezolizumab, carboplatin, and etoposide but responds to additional irinotecan and anlotinib in a small cell lung cancer patient.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy associated with poor prognosis. Metastasis to sites outside the chest at the time of initial diagnosis, such as bone, brain, and liver metastasis have been found in most SCLC patients. Iris metastases from SCLC have rarely been previously reported, and often cause eye pain and blindness in patients. Here, we report a patient with SCLC who presented with iris metastasis in the right eye and metastasis in the left adrenal gland due to disease progression on first-line therapy, which subsequently caused pain and blindness in the right eye. The patient was treated with second-line irinotecan combined with anlotinib and atezolizumab and did not receive any local treatment in the right eye. After only one cycle of treatment, the iris metastases in the right eye were smaller than before, and the visual acuity in the right eye recovered. At the same time, her left adrenal metastases were also significantly smaller than before. Our case suggests that systemic therapy with effective treatment options can similarly improve iris metastases in patients.