Utilization of multiplex polymerase chain reaction for simultaneous and rapid detection of viral infections from different ocular structures.

The impact of viral keratitis (VK) on individuals and society is notable. Early diagnosis and treatment are crucial in managing viral keratitis effectively. Timely intervention with antiviral medications and supportive care can help mitigate the severity of the infection and improve visual outcomes. We examined the prevalence of varicella-zoster virus (VZV), herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), adenovirus (AdV) and herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) in patients suspected for ocular infections. Patients included in the study exhibited various clinical manifestations indicative of ocular pathology, such as infectious keratitis, corneal scar, endogenous endophthalmitis, panuveitis, endothelitis, stromal edema, and other relevant conditions. Four different types of tear fluid, corneal samples epithelium, aqueous humor and vitreous humor were taken. After genome extraction, multiplex real-time PCR was used for diagnosis of viruses. 48 (29.6%) out of the total of 162 (100%) eye specimen were positive. The dominant prevalence was VZV (12.3%) and HSV-1 (11.7%) followed by AdV (4.9%) and HSV-2 (0.6%). There were 4 (8.3%) coinfections within the samples (HSV-1 and VZV). Aqueous humor samples demonstrated superior virus detection ability and our only HSV-2 positive sample was from aqueous humor. The utilization of multiplex real-time PCR assays in differential diagnosis of VK holds promise for expeditious diagnoses while also preventing unwarranted antibiotic prescriptions. Moreover, the aqueous humor appears to be a more sensitive site for detecting viral keratitis.

A review on human body fluids for the diagnosis of viral infections: scope for rapid detection of COVID-19.

Introduction: The unprecedented outbreaks of corona virus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) have highlighted the necessity of readily available, reliable, precise, and faster techniques for its detection. Nasopharyngeal swab has been the gold standard for the diagnosis of COVID-19. However, it is not an ideal screening procedure for massive screening as it implicates the patient's stay in the hospital or at home until diagnosis, thus causing crowding of the specimen at the diagnostic centers. Present study deal with the exploration of potential application of different body fluids using certain highly objective techniques (Optical and e-Nose) for faster detection of molecular markers thereby diagnosing viral infections.Areas covered: This report presents an evaluation of different body fluids, and their advantages for the rapid detection of COVID-19, coupled with highly sensitive optical techniques for the detection of molecular biomarkers.Expert opinion: Tears, saliva, and breath samples can provide valuable information about viral infections. Our brief review strongly recommends the application of saliva/tears and exhaled breath as clinical samples using technics such as high-performance liquid chromatography-laser-induced fluorescence, photoacoustic spectroscopy, and e-Nose, respectively, for the fast diagnosis of viral infections.

Relations between the ocular surface and SARS-CoV-2 / Relações entre superfície ocular e SARS-CoV-2

ABSTRACT Introduction: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has been a major challenge for the international scientific community. Since its inception, studies aiming to describe pathophysiological aspects and clinical manifestations of the disease have been conducted, raising hypotheses and confirming possible associations. One aspect of this scientific medical production is the role of the ocular surface as a means of transmission and clinical presentation of viral syndrome. Objectives: To analyze the role of the ocular surface in transmission, pathophysiology, and clinical manifestations of SARS-CoV-2, by means of a systematic review. Methods: The search was carried out in three databases: Cochrane, PubMed Central Journals and MEDLINE, using the following descriptors: "COVID-19, ophthalmology". The filters last five years and studies on humans resulted in 32 studies; in that 12 were excluded for not meeting the purpose of the study. Results: There are still few published studies on the relation between SARS-CoV-2 and the ocular route. Most studies showed an association between the presence of nonspecific ocular manifestations and infection by the new coronavirus, with limitations in the number of patients analyzed and the methodology adopted. Hypotheses about the pathophysiological role are largely anchored in the association of SARS-CoV and the ocular surface evaluated in the past. Comments: The results found are still not sufficient to confirm the role of the ocular surface in the pathophysiology of the disease. Most of these preliminary studies are of considerable importance in raising hypotheses based on the medical analysis of the patients studied. However, larger studies with standardized methodology for diagnostic protocol and laboratory analysis of the individuals assessed are required.

RESUMO Introdução: A pandemia da SARS-CoV-2 tem sido um grande desafio para a comunidade científica internacional. Desde seu surgimento, estudos com a intenção de descrever os aspectos fisiopatológicos e as manifestações clínicas da doença vêm sendo conduzidos, levantando hipóteses e confirmando possíveis associações. Um dos temas dessa produção médica científica é o papel da superfície ocular como meio de transmissão e apresentação clínica da síndrome viral. Objetivo: Analisar o papel da superfície ocular na transmissão, na fisiopatologia e nas manifestações clínicas de SARS-CoV-2, através de uma revisão sistemática. Realizou-se a busca em três bancos de dados Cochrane Database, PubMed® e MEDLINE®, utilizando os descritores "COVID-19 e ophthalmology". Foram definidos como filtros o artigo ter sido publicado nos últimos 5 anos e estudo realizado em humanos, tendo sido encontrados 32 artigos. Destes, foram excluídos 12 por não corresponderem ao objetivo do estudo. Resultados: Ainda são poucos os estudos publicados sobre a relação entre o coronavírus 2 da síndrome respiratória aguda grave (SARS-CoV-2) e a via ocular. A maioria dos estudos mostrou associação entre a presença de manifestações oculares inespecíficas e a infecção pelo novo coronavírus, com limitações no número de pacientes analisados e na metodologia adotada. Hipóteses sobre o papel fisiopatológico se ancoram, em grande parte, na associação estudada entre o SARS-CoV-2 e a superfície ocular no passado. Comentários: Os resultados encontrados ainda não são suficientes para confirmar o papel da superfície ocular na fisiopatologia da doença. Grande parte desses estudos preliminares têm importância considerável ao levantar hipóteses baseadas na análise clínica dos pacientes estudados. No entanto, são necessários estudos maiores e com metodologia padronizada para protocolo diagnóstico e análise laboratorial dos indivíduos avaliados.

Guidelines and Recommendations for Tonometry Use during the COVID-19 Era.

The novel coronavirus disease COVID-19 caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has resulted in a substantial change in eye care and clinical practice. There has been conflicting information and weak evidence on the virus's transmission through tears. Yet, virus detection on cornea and conjunctiva surface as a gateway for infection is not well-studied. Moreover, there have been no reported cases of SARS-CoV-2 transmission through tonometry to date. Thus, this uncertainty has urged this review on evidence-based guidelines and recommendations on tonometer use in the COVID-19 era. The aim of this article is to provide ophthalmologists with recommendations for tonometry practice based on current evidence and best practice guidelines.

[A special on epidemic prevention and control: ophthalmologic research and prevention of 2019 novel coronavirus based on ocular manifestations of viral diseases].

This article was published ahead of print on the official website of Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology on February 24, 2020. In China, the fight against the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) has been at a critical stage. It has been confirmed that the transmission of 2019-nCoV is mainly through respiratory droplets and contact. Some scholars also pointed out that the possibility of transmission through the digestive system and eyes should not be ignored. Whether infection with 2019-nCoV will develop eye symptoms and whether the virus will spread through eyes are confusing to the medical workers and the general public, and it is ophthalmologists' responsibility to carry out in-depth discussions. Based on the ocular manifestations of viral diseases, this article analyzes whether the eye secretions and tears carry the virus, and whether ophthalmologists and patients are at a high risk for 2019-nCoV infection, and then presents the current research methods and the necessary prevention and control measures in the field of ophthalmology, with an aim to contribute to the fight against 2019-nCoV. ( Chin J Ophthalmol, 2020, 56: 414-417).

COVID-19 pandemic from an ophthalmology point of view.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by a highly contagious RNA virus termed as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Ophthalmologists are at high-risk due to their proximity and short working distance at the time of slit-lamp examination. Eye care professionals can be caught unaware because conjunctivitis may be one of the first signs of COVID-19 at presentation, even precluding the emergence of additional symptoms such as dry cough and anosmia. Breath and eye shields as well as N95 masks, should be worn while examining patients with fever, breathlessness, or any history of international travel or travel from any hotspot besides maintaining hand hygiene. All elective surgeries need to be deferred. Adults or children with sudden-onset painful or painless visual loss, or sudden-onset squint, or sudden-onset floaters or severe lid oedema need a referral for urgent care. Patients should be told to discontinue contact lens wear if they have any symptoms of COVID-19. Cornea retrieval should be avoided in confirmed cases and suspects, and long-term preservation medium for storage of corneas should be encouraged. Retinal screening is unnecessary for coronavirus patients taking chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine as the probability of toxic damage to the retina is less due to short-duration of drug therapy. Tele-ophthalmology and artificial intelligence should be preferred for increasing doctor-patient interaction.

COVID-19 and the eye: how much do we really know? A best evidence review.

To identify and classify available information regarding COVID-19 and eye care according to the level of evidence, within four main topics of interest: evidence of the virus in tears and the ocular surface, infection via the conjunctival route, ocular manifestations, and best practice recommendations. A structured review was conducted in PubMed, ScienceDirect, LILACS, SciELO, the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar on COVID-19 and ophthalmology. The Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence worksheet was used for quality assessments. 1018 items were identified in the search; 26 records were included in the qualitative synthesis, which encompassed 6 literature reviews, 10 case series or cross-sectional studies, 4 case reports, and 6 intervention descriptions. Seventeen out of 26 records (65%) were categorized as level 5 within the Oxford CBME methodology grading system, the rest were level 4. The evidence generated on COVID-19 and ophthalmology to date is limited, although this is understandable given the circumstances. Both the possible presence of viral particles in tears and conjunctiva, and the potential for conjunctival transmission remain controversial. Ocular manifestations are not frequent and could resemble viral infection of the ocular surface. Most recommendations are based on the strategies implemented by Asian countries during previous coronavirus outbreaks. There is a need for substantive studies evaluating these strategies in the setting of SARS-CoV-2. In the meantime, plans for applying these measures must be implemented with caution, taking into account the context of each individual country, and undergo regular evaluation.

COVID-19 and the eye: how much do we really know? A best evidence review / COVID-19 e o olho: quanto sabemos realmente? Uma revisão das melhores evidências

ABSTRACT To identify and classify available information regarding COVID-19 and eye care according to the level of evidence, within four main topics of interest: evidence of the virus in tears and the ocular surface, infection via the conjunctival route, ocular manifestations, and best practice recommendations. A structured review was conducted in PubMed, ScienceDirect, LILACS, SciELO, the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar on COVID-19 and ophthalmology. The Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence worksheet was used for quality assessments. 1018 items were identified in the search; 26 records were included in the qualitative synthesis, which encompassed 6 literature reviews, 10 case series or cross-sectional studies, 4 case reports, and 6 intervention descriptions. Seventeen out of 26 records (65%) were categorized as level 5 within the Oxford CBME methodology grading system, the rest were level 4. The evidence generated on COVID-19 and ophthalmology to date is limited, although this is understandable given the circumstances. Both the possible presence of viral particles in tears and conjunctiva, and the potential for conjunctival transmission remain controversial. Ocular manifestations are not frequent and could resemble viral infection of the ocular surface. Most recommendations are based on the strategies implemented by Asian countries during previous coronavirus outbreaks. There is a need for substantive studies evaluating these strategies in the setting of SARS-CoV-2. In the meantime, plans for applying these measures must be implemented with caution, taking into account the context of each individual country, and undergo regular evaluation.

RESUMO Identificar e classificar as informações disponíveis sobre o COVID-19 e o tratamento oftalmológico de acordo com o nível de evidência, dentro de quatro tópicos principais de interesse: evidência do vírus nas lágrimas e na superfície ocular, infecção pela via conjuntival, manifestações oculares e recomendações de melhores práticas. Foi realizada uma revisão estruturada no PubMed, ScienceDirect, LILACS, SciELO, Biblioteca Cochrane e Google Scholar no COVID-19 e oftalmologia. A planilha de Níveis de Evidência 2011 do Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine 2011 foi usada para avaliações de qualidade. Mil e dezoito itens foram identificados na busca; Foram incluídos 26 registros na síntese qualitativa, que incluiu 6 revisões de literatura, 10 séries de casos ou estudos transversais, 4 relatos de casos e 6 descrições de intervenções. Dezessete dos 26 registros (65%) foram classificados como nível 5 no sistema de classificação da metodologia Oxford CBME, o restante foi no nível 4. As evidências geradas no COVID-19 e na oftalmologia até o momento são limitadas, embora isso seja compreensível dadas as circunstâncias. Tanto a possível presença de partículas virais em lágrimas e conjuntiva quanto o potencial de transmissão conjuntival permanecem controversos. As manifestações oculares não são frequentes e podem se assemelhar a infecção viral da superfície ocular. A maioria das recomendações baseia-se nas estratégias implementadas pelos países asiáticos durante surtos anteriores de coronavírus. Há necessidade de estudos aprofundados avaliando essas estratégias no cenário da SARS-CoV-2. Enquanto isso, os planos para a aplicação dessas medidas devem ser implementados com cautela, levando em consideração o contexto de cada país e submetidos a auditorias periódicas.

COVID-19: Ophthalmological Aspects of the SARS-CoV 2 Global Pandemic. / COVID-19: ophthalmologische Aspekte der globalen SARS-CoV-2-Pandemie.

PURPOSE: To perform a systematic analysis of articles on the ophthalmological implications of the global COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: PubMed.gov was searched for relevant articles using the keywords "COVID-19", "coronavirus", and "SARS-CoV-2" in conjunction with "ophthalmology" and "eye". Moreover, official recommendations of ophthalmological societies were systematically reviewed, with a focus on the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) and the Royal College of Ophthalmologists (RCOphth). RESULTS: As of April 16, 2020, in total, 21 peer-reviewed articles on the ophthalmological aspects of COVID-19 were identified. Of these, 12 (57.1%) were from Asia, 6 (28.6%) from the United States of America, and 3 (14.3%) from Europe. There were 5 (23.8%) original studies, 10 (47.6%) letters, 3 (14.2%) case reports, and 3 (14.2%) reviews. These articles could be classified into the topics "Modes and prevention of (ocular) transmission", "Ophthalmological manifestations of COVID-19", "Clinical guidance concerning ophthalmological practice during the COVID-19 pandemic", and "Practical recommendations for clinical infrastructure". Practical recommendations could be extracted from official statements of the AAO and the RCOphth. CONCLUSION: Within a short period, a growing body of articles has started to elucidate the ophthalmological implications of COVID-19. As the eye can represent a route of infection (actively via tears and passively via the nasoacrimal duct), ophthalmological care has to undergo substantial modifications during this pandemic. In the eye, COVID-19 can manifest as keratoconjunctivitis.

COVID-19: Limiting the Risks for Eye Care Professionals.

After the outbreak of the disease COVID-19, it has reached pandemic proportions within a very short time. It is mainly transmitted human-to-human through direct contact with secretions from an infected person or through inhalation of droplets containing SARS-CoV-2. It is controversial whether the virus may be transmitted via tears. Exposed ocular surface can serve as a gateway in transmission and acquiring respiratory diseases. Considering the reported cases on healthcare workers indicating nosocomial transmission and the anatomical and physiological aspects it is perceived that ophthalmic healthcare professionals are at higher risk of contracting the virus by virtue of their job. In this narrative review we discuss current evidence around detection of SARS-CoV-2 in human tears and forms of transmissions reported to date. We also provide a comprehensive approach that may be implemented in an ophthalmic care facility to protect healthcare personnel, as well as patients, from contracting the virus.

Evaluation of adenovirus amplified detection of immunochromatographic test using tears including conjunctival exudate in patients with adenoviral keratoconjunctivitis.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated a novel silver amplification immunochromatography test for rapid detection of adenovirus (AdV) antigen equipped with an automated reader system using tears including conjunctival exudate in patients with adenoviral keratoconjunctivitis. METHODS: Two kinds of immunochromatographic (IC) kits, a conventional IC kit for conjunctival scrapings (control kit) and an IC kit using tears including conjunctival exudate collected by pressing a filter paper strip on the conjunctiva (test kit), were tested on 90 patients who attended Migita Eye Clinic with suspected adenoviral conjunctivitis. The results of the test kits were automatically obtained by a specific reader, which was based on silver amplification immunochromatography system, in 15 min. The detection of AdV was confirmed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method, and typing was performed by direct sequencing. Comparative dilution assay was carried out with the two kits, using AdV type 3 and type 54 strains. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the control kit and test kit was 89.8% and 98.3%, respectively. The specificity of both kits was 100%. A significant difference in the sensitivities of the two IC kits against PCR positivity was observed (P < 0.01). A significant correlation was found between AdV DNA copy numbers on a logarithmic scale obtained with the two tests (P < 0.01). The sensitivity of the test kit was 32-64-fold higher than that of the control kit without silver amplification for both AdV types. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that this novel amplified AdV detection kit using tears including conjunctival exudate is useful, because it decreases patients' discomfort from specimen collection and its sensitivity is significantly higher than that of the conventional IC kit.

Diagnostic tests for human rabies. / Tests diagnostiques de la rage chez l'homme.

The lack of reliable data concerning the number of human deaths from rabies presents one of the principal difficulties in a realistic assessment of the importance of this disease, and this lack of an accurate assessment has led to its underestimation and neglect. Priority should therefore be given to establishing a diagnostic test that can confirm human rabies on the basis of biological results. Indeed, only a laboratory diagnosis can properly identify infection, because clinical diagnosis remains difficult to interpret and is insufficiently specific. Historically, diagnosis has been based solely on post-mortem analysis of a cerebral biopsy using immunofluorescence techniques. Although this remains the standard method, considerable progress has been made with the advent of new molecular techniques and the evaluation of new, less-invasive sampling methods that are more easily accepted by the patient's family. Intra-vitam diagnosis of human rabies is now possible using reliable, robust, validated techniques that can be used everywhere, including in regions with limited resources, using minimally invasive or non-invasive sampling (such as saliva or skin biopsies). In practice, one of the major challenges with the diagnosis of human rabies is still the transfer and accessibility of such validated techniques in centralised reference laboratories located in low-income enzootic countries, in order to achieve the biological confirmation of each suspected case of rabies. At the same time, it is necessary to develop easy, fast and low-cost diagnostic methods that can be used in rural and remote areas in peripheral laboratories, or ideally at the patient's bedside.

L'absence de données fiables concernant le nombre de décès humains dus à la rage représente l'une des limitations majeures à l'évaluation réelle du poids mondial de cette maladie, contribuant ainsi à sa sous-estimation et à son caractère négligé. Devant ce constat, l'établissement d'un diagnostic de confirmation de la rage chez l'homme basé sur des résultats biologiques doit être favorisé. En effet, seul le diagnostic de laboratoire permet de valider l'infection, le diagnostic clinique restant difficile d'interprétation et insuffisamment spécifique. Historiquement, ce diagnostic était réalisé exclusivement au stade post-mortem via l'analyse d'une biopsie cérébrale par technique d'immunofluorescence. Bien qu'il s'agisse encore de la méthode de référence, des progrès considérables ont été faits, avec l'avènement de nouvelles techniques moléculaires et l'évaluation de nouveaux types de prélèvements moins invasifs et facilement acceptés par les proches du patient. Ces progrès autorisent maintenant la mise en oeuvre d'un diagnostic intra-vitam de la rage chez l'homme basé sur des techniques fiables, robustes et validées et pouvant être utilisées à tout niveau y compris dans les zones à ressources limitées à partir de prélèvements peu ou non invasifs (tels la salive ou les biopsies de peau). En effet, l'un des enjeux majeurs du diagnostic de la rage chez l'homme réside aussi dans le transfert et l'accessibilité de ces techniques validées, au niveau des laboratoires de référence situés dans les pays enzootiques à faible revenu, afin de réaliser une confirmation biologique de chaque cas suspect de rage. En parallèle, il est nécessaire de poursuivre les recherches sur le développement de méthodes de diagnostic simplifiées, rapides et de faible coût pouvant être utilisées de façon délocalisée, dans les laboratoires périphériques en zone rurale, voire au lit du patient.

La ausencia de datos fidedignos sobre el número de personas fallecidas a causa de la rabia constituye una de las principales limitaciones a la hora de evaluar con exactitud la carga mundial que impone la enfermedad, lo que contribuye al hecho de que esté subestimada y, por consiguiente, desatendida. De semejante constatación se desprende la necesidad de favorecer la instauración de un diagnóstico de confirmación de la rabia humana basado en resultados biológicos, en la medida en que el diagnóstico de laboratorio es el único modo de validar la presencia de la infección, pues el diagnóstico clínico presenta dificultades de interpretación y no es lo bastante específico. Históricamente este diagnóstico se realizaba únicamente tras la muerte del individuo, mediante el análisis por inmunofluorescencia de una muestra encefálica. Aunque este sigue siendo el método de referencia, el advenimiento de nuevas técnicas moleculares y el estudio de nuevos tipos de muestras, obtenidas por métodos menos invasivos y fácilmente aceptados por los allegados del paciente, han deparado progresos considerables, que permiten hoy realizar un diagnóstico intra-vitam de la rabia humana utilizando técnicas fiables, robustas y validadas que se pueden aplicar en todos los niveles, incluso en zonas con escasos recursos, a partir de muestras obtenidas por procedimientos poco o nada invasivos (muestras de saliva o biopsias de piel). Uno de los principales envites del diagnóstico de la rabia en el ser humano reside, en efecto, en la accesibilidad y la transferencia de estas técnicas validadas a laboratorios de referencia situados en los países enzoóticos de renta baja para poder realizar en ellos una confirmación biológica de todo caso sospechoso de rabia. Paralelamente, es necesario seguir investigando para instituir métodos de diagnóstico simplificados, rápidos y poco costosos que se puedan aplicar de forma descentralizada, esto es, en los laboratorios periféricos de zonas rurales e incluso junto al lecho del paciente.

Zika Virus Infection in Mice Causes Panuveitis with Shedding of Virus in Tears.

Zika virus (ZIKV) is an emerging flavivirus that causes congenital abnormalities and Guillain-Barré syndrome. ZIKV infection also results in severe eye disease characterized by optic neuritis, chorioretinal atrophy, and blindness in newborns and conjunctivitis and uveitis in adults. We evaluated ZIKV infection of the eye by using recently developed mouse models of pathogenesis. ZIKV-inoculated mice developed conjunctivitis, panuveitis, and infection of the cornea, iris, optic nerve, and ganglion and bipolar cells in the retina. This phenotype was independent of the entry receptors Axl or Mertk, given that Axl(-/-), Mertk(-/-), and Axl(-/-)Mertk(-/-) double knockout mice sustained levels of infection similar to those of control animals. We also detected abundant viral RNA in tears, suggesting that virus might be secreted from lacrimal glands or shed from the cornea. This model provides a foundation for studying ZIKV-induced ocular disease, defining mechanisms of viral persistence, and developing therapeutic approaches for viral infections of the eye.

The Investigation of HCV RNA in Tear Fluid and Aqueous Humor in Patients with Anti-HCV Antibody Positive Who Underwent Cataract Surgery.

PURPOSE: To obtain aqueous humor and tear fluid samples during cataract surgery of the hepatitis C virus (HCV)-antibody-positive patients in order to analyze them for HCV RNA and compare these measurements with serum HCV RNA levels. METHODS: Twenty-nine anti-HCV-positive patients were included this study. HCV RNA viral load levels were determined by commercial real-time polymerase chain reaction system. Antibodies to HCV were screened with the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using anti-HCV test kit. RESULTS: Log10 HCV RNA levels were found to be 6.00 ± 1.06 IU/mL in serum, 2.76 ± 0.36 IU/mL in the aqueous humor, and 1.91 ± 0.93 IU/mL in tear fluid. No correlation was detected between samples for HCV RNA positivity (p = .390, κ = .102). We have observed that, viral RNA was detected in the aqueous humor, while not in serum in one case, whereas viral RNA was detected in tear fluid but not in serum in another case. CONCLUSIONS: Although viral load detected in aqueous humor and tear fluid samples was considerably lower compared to the serum samples, it can still be important in terms of infectivity.

Sensitivity and specificity of the AdenoPlus test for diagnosing adenoviral conjunctivitis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical sensitivity and specificity of the AdenoPlus test with those of both viral cell culture (CC) with confirmatory immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) at detecting the presence of adenovirus in tear fluid. METHODS: A prospective, sequential, masked, multicenter clinical trial enrolled 128 patients presenting with a clinical diagnosis of acute viral conjunctivitis from a combination of 8 private ophthalmology practices and academic centers. Patients were tested with AdenoPlus, CC-IFA, and PCR to detect the presence of adenovirus. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The sensitivity and specificity of AdenoPlus were assessed for identifying cases of adenoviral conjunctivitis. RESULTS: Of the 128 patients enrolled, 36 patients' results were found to be positive by either CC-IFA or PCR and 29 patients' results were found to be positive by both CC-IFA and PCR. When compared only with CC-IFA, AdenoPlus showed a sensitivity of 90% (28/31) and specificity of 96% (93/97). When compared only with PCR, AdenoPlus showed a sensitivity of 85% (29/34) and specificity of 98% (89/91). When compared with both CC-IFA and PCR, AdenoPlus showed a sensitivity of 93% (27/29) and specificity of 98% (88/90). When compared with PCR, CC-IFA showed a sensitivity of 85% (29/34) and specificity of 99% (90/91). CONCLUSION: AdenoPlus is sensitive and specific at detecting adenoviral conjunctivitis. APPLICATION TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: An accurate and rapid in-office test can prevent the misdiagnosis of adenoviral conjunctivitis that leads to the spread of disease, unnecessary antibiotic use, and increased health care costs. Additionally, AdenoPlus may help a clinician make a more informed treatment decision regarding the use of novel therapeutics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00921895.

The proportion of specific viral subpopulations in attenuated Arkansas Delmarva poultry industry infectious bronchitis vaccines influences vaccination outcome.

We investigated the significance of differing proportions of specific subpopulations among commercial Arkansas (Ark) Delmarva poultry industry (DPI) vaccines with regard to vaccination outcome. Two ArkDPI-derived vaccines that contain a higher proportion of viruses with S1 genes that become selected during replication in chickens exhibited more rapid establishment of those selected subpopulations in chickens, produced significantly higher viral loads in tears, and induced higher antibody responses compared with two other ArkDPI vaccines with lower proportions of viruses that become selected in chickens. The presence of higher proportions of selected subpopulations was also associated with a significantly higher incidence of respiratory signs early after vaccination and in some cases more severe tracheal lesions. However, one of the ArkDPI-derived vaccines with a lower proportion of selected subpopulations, despite producing a lower viral load in tears, also induced a higher incidence of respiratory signs later after vaccination and more severe tracheal lesions. Furthermore, one of the ArkDPI-derived vaccines with a higher proportion of selected subpopulations, despite producing a higher viral loads in tears, resulted in less severe tracheal damage. These discrepancies suggest that infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) load in tears may not always predict degree of tracheal damage and that phenotypic characteristics other than S1 may also be involved in severity of vaccine reactions following ArkDPI vaccine administration. We observed lower antibody responses to the vaccines that produced lower viral loads, which might contribute to the persistence of Ark serotype IBV vaccines observed in commercial flocks.

The kinetics of herpes virus on the ocular surface and suppression of its reactivation.

Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) establishes a latent infection in sensory neurons that can sometimes be reactivated. HSV-1 keratitis often recurs and can be vision threatening. Reactivation of the latent virus can be stimulated by stress, immunosuppression, trauma, adrenergic iontophoresis, and UV radiation. Healthy and asymptomatic individuals are known to shed HSV-1, and this is a major factor in the spread of the virus. We investigated the frequency of shedding of HSV-1 DNA in tears of dry eye patients and individuals with conjunctivitis. Subjects were divided into 3 groups: normal (12 eyes), dry eye (11 eyes), and conjunctivitis (15 eyes). Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was used for HSV DNA detection. The incidences of HSV positivity in the normal, dry eye, and conjunctivitis groups were 1 of 12 (8.3%), 3 of 11 (27.3%), and 4 of 15 (26.7%), respectively. We have previously shown that bromfenac sodium eye drops, intramuscular adenosine monophosphate, and geldanamycin effectively lower HSV-1 recurrence rates in a mouse model. Recently, we also found that nuclear factor κ-B, an IκB kinase-ß inhibitor, could be a candidate for reducing HSV-1 reactivation. We sampled recipients' corneal buttons during keratoplasty and performed polymerase chain reaction. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA was detected in corneas obtained from some patients, and the copy number of the detected CMV DNA was quantified. CMV DNA-positive samples were taken from 2 of the 3 patients with ocular pemphigoid; thus, in future work, the relationship between CMV in the cornea and the incidence/onset of ocular diseases of the anterior segment needs to be evaluated.

Role of human herpes virus 6 in corneal inflammation alone or with human herpesviruses.

PURPOSE: : The purpose of this study was to determine the association of human herpes virus 6 (HHV-6) and/or other human herpesviruses in corneal inflammation using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). METHODS: : We collected tear films, conjunctival smears, and a corneal button of inflamed cornea, and the presence of HHV-6 and other herpesviruses in these samples were assessed by a nested PCR. RESULTS: : In tear films collected from 3 of 9 patients with dendritic keratitis, HHV-6 DNA was positive twice, together with herpes simplex virus (HSV) or varicella zoster virus DNA most often, during the acute phase of the disease. Two other patients in this group were either positive for HSV-1 and varicella zoster virus or for HSV-1 and Epstein-Barr virus DNA but negative for HHV-6. When another 12 patients' smear samples from corneal ulcer or keratouveitis were examined, 9 were positive for HHV-6 DNA. Of these, 4 were positive for HSV-1 simultaneously, whereas the remaining 5 patients were negative for HSV-1. One patient's smear was positive for HSV-1 but not for HHV-6. In the corneal button, both HSV and HHV-6 DNAs were positive by nested PCR. HHV-6 was also positive by nested PCR in the conjunctival swab obtained from the contralateral inflamed eye of the patient. CONCLUSIONS: : In 22 patients with corneal inflammation, HHV-6 was positive in 14 of 22 patients and HSV-1 was found in 9 of those patients. These data indicated that the association of HHV-6 with disease was more frequent than with other herpesviruses and that HHV-6 may be another sole causative agent for corneal inflammation.

[Detection of adenovirus and herpes simplex virus in the tears of chronic conjunctivitis].

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the tears of outpatients who had chronic conjunctivitis infected adenovirus (AdV) and (or) herpes simplex virus (HSV). METHODS: It was an experimental study. 81 patients with chronic conjunctivitis (adult 66 cases, children 15 cases), 9 cases with acute viral conjunctivitis and 30 healthy control cases. To collect their tears, use polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect herpes simplex virus and adenovirus, and analyze the results of PCR, clinical symptoms and signs. RESULTS: In patients with chronic conjunctivitis, adenovirus-positive rate was 32.1% (26/81) and herpes simplex virus-positive rate was 30.9% (25/81). In children patients with chronic conjunctivitis, the adenovirus-positive rate was 33.3% (5/15) and herpes simplex virus-positive rate was 13.3% (2/15). In adult group, the adenovirus-positive rate was 31.8% (21/66) and herpes simplex virus-positive rate was 34.8% (23/66). In patients who underwent acute conjunctivitis, the adenovirus-positive rate was 61.5% (16/26). It has statistical differences (chi2=16.884, P<0.01) with no acute conjunctivitis patients. The herpes simplex virus-positive rate was 42.3% (11/26). It has statistical differences (chi2=5.351, P=0.021) with no acute conjunctivitis patients. The positive rate of virus detection was 0% (0/30) in the normal negative control group. The adenovirus-positive rate was 100.0% (9/9) in the positive control group-patients with acute viral conjunctivitis. 37 patients were adenovirus-positive and (or) herpes simplex virus-positive. The rate of redness with itching was 32.4% (12/37) in virus positive patient. The rate of redness was 64.9% (24/37). The rate of itching was 56.8% (21/37). The rate of lower eyelid follicles was 73.0% (27/37) in virus positive patients. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of adenovirus and herpes simplex virus positive expression is considerable in the patients with chronic conjunctivitis. The positive rate of patients with the history of virus infection is rather higher than no infection history.